Duly Elected President Trump’s Supreme Court Date and Evidence
Presidents Day Monday February 15, 2021
By Stew Webb
The below website links are Sidney Powell Attorney and Lin Wood Attorney representing President Trump.
The evidence presented by Mike Lindell of “My Pillow”
Sidney Powell
https://www.sidneypowell.com
Lin Wood
Bio
Mike Lindell
SCOTUS Adds Lin Wood And Sidney Powell Election Fraud Lawsuits To List Of Cases To Be Considered
thefederalistpapers.org/us/scotus-adds-lin-wood-sidney-powell-election-fraud-lawsuits-list-cases-considered
By Ryan Ledendecker
The U.S. Supreme Court made headlines on Friday after it was revealed that they added a number of election fraud-related cases to a list of cases they’re considering taking during their mid-February conference.
According to the Washington Examiner, cases brought to the High Court by pro-Trump lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood have been added to the list for consideration, along with a lawsuit filed by Rep. Mike Kelly in Pennsylvania for similar election fraud claims.
Reportedly, the one common theme of the lawsuits added for consideration is that they all concern the last-minute expansion of mail-in ballots in a number of battleground states.
Now, before anyone gets too excited, it’s important to temper expectations greatly, as SCOTUS adds quite a few cases to their list for consideration and only very few of them get selected for a proper hearing. Should any of the election-related lawsuits be selected, they likely wouldn’t be heard until October at the earliest.
Previously, the High Court denied requests for expediting the cases, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. While hearing one of the election-related cases wouldn’t overturn the results of the 2020 election, it could be a significant step to clamping down on the states’ ability to move the proverbial goalpost at the last minute, which many seemed to have done in the 2020 election.
John Eastman, one of Donald Trump’s attorneys, said it’s important that SCOTUS hear at least one of these cases in order to preserve election integrity for future elections. That would be especially helpful for the 2022 midterm elections when Republicans will have a real chance at taking back both the House and the Senate.
“Our legal issue,” Eastman said, referencing Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot rules, “remains important and in need of the court’s review.”
Supreme Court to consider election lawsuits in February
February 05, 2021
newspunch.com/its-happening-us-supreme-court-schedules-pennsylvania-election-case-sidney-powells-case-lin-woods-case-for-feb-19/
The Supreme Court on Friday listed several high-profile election lawsuits for consideration at its mid-February conference.
The cases include challenges to the 2020 election from Trump-aligned lawyers Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, as well as Republican Rep. Mike Kelly’s Pennsylvania lawsuit. Nearly every lawsuit takes issue with the expanded use of mail-in ballots by many states.
The decision came after the court declined to fast-track all election-related litigation in early January.
In nearly every plea for expedition, lawyers backing former President Donald Trump told the court that if the cases were not heard before President Biden’s inauguration, their success would be unlikely.
But after the court pushed them off, many lawyers said that the challenges were still important and could have long-term implications for election fairness. Trump lawyer John Eastman told the Washington Examiner that even with Trump out of office, it was important to settle the issues raised by expanded mail-in voting.
“Our legal issue,” he said, referring to the way in which Pennsylvania conducted the 2020 election, “remains important and in need of the court’s review.”
Similarly, Kelly’s lawyer Greg Teufel, told the Washington Examiner after the court refused to hear his case before the inauguration that the 10-year congressman and major Trump ally had no intention of dropping the suit.
As election litigation continues to play out in the courts, many Republican state legislators have begun introducing bills to curb mail-in voting through law.
If the Supreme Court accepts any of the election lawsuits, it is likely that they won’t be heard until October.
