By Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert
Al Gore Calls For ‘AMERICAN SPRING’ – We Can Afford Our Destiny
This speech given by Al Gore speaks to the importance of having a political movement in this country, inspired and driven by big ideas, chasing major change (not incremental shifts), and going after the issues that are important to this world and the people who live on it. Climate change. Education. Political fairness.
The youth of this country are the driving force for major change and we should respect the movements that these forces bring to the betterment of the country and our people. When Al Gore calls for an AMERICAN SPRING, much like the Arab Spring, he is calling out to the voices in America who want to bring positive change to this nation and encourage that change to make its presence known in big ways.
Bernie Sanders is aiming for big, positive change. Hillary Clinton is circling the status-quo like a marble circling the drain. Incremental change is nothing to be excited about, nor is it worth voting for… and Hillary Clinton, as the harbinger of ‘inches’ instead of ‘miles’ of future change only shows that the youth of this country, ages 60 and lower, are the ones who will be driving the change this country truly needs.
Stew Webb Editors Note: The articles original links had to be removed due to a massive attacks on websites who published these papers.
Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
Op-Ed by Jake Anderson April 6, 2016
With Senator Bernie Sanders winning seven of the last eight delegate battles — the most recent was Tuesday night’s Wisconsin victory — there’s a feeling in the air that most progressives haven’t felt since the Iowa caucus. It speaks to a hard truth Hillary Clinton and her choleric campaign staffers will encounter when they wake up in the morning: Bernie really could still beat Clinton and become the Democratic nominee for president.
No way, some of you are saying. The television faces said the delegate math was too hard. The superdelegates make it impossible. Hillary wins the primaries, Bernie only wins caucuses;America won’t elect a socialist; the nation won’t rally behind free healthcare and college tuition.
Despite the supposedly ineluctable logic of Sanders’ unelectability, many pundits now believe there has been a seismic shift in the 2016 presidential race. It is becoming increasingly obvious that Americans are sick to death of the two corporatist political establishments and will do anything to send them a message. The evidence of this is that the two most popular candidates in the 2016 election are a Jewish democratic socialist and a reality TV star who referred to his penis during a nationally televised debate.
Then there’s the matter of the Panama Papers. In case you haven’t heard about them over the roar of mainstream media’s ‘round-the-clock anti-Trump coverage, it’s being referred to as the biggest data leak in history. For the last year, 400 journalists have been secretly decoding 11.5 million documents leaked from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. The 2.6 terabytes of data show billions of dollars worth of transactions dating back 40 years.
Acquired from an anonymous source by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and then shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the documents present a jaw-dropping paper trail of how the upper echelon of the 1 percent has used shell companies and offshore tax havens to avoid paying billions of dollars in taxes. In less than a week of exposure, the Panama Papers have already implicated 140 world leaders from 50 different countries. Top executives and celebrities who appear in the leaked emails, PDFs, and other documents may also be indicted in money laundering, tax evasion, and sanctions-busting activities.
Though the source of the leak opted not to do a Wikileaks style data dump and is instead allowing media outlets to curate the information, international tax reform could be imminent.
The revelations are relevant to the 2016 presidential election because they once again illustrate the stark contrast in judgement between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. The transgressions documented in the Panama Papers were directly facilitated by the Panama-United States Trade Promotion Agreement, which Congress ratified in 2012. In 2011, Sanders took to the floor of the senate to strongly denounce the trade deal:
“Panama is a world leader when it comes to allowing wealthy Americans and large corporations to evade US taxes by stashing their cash in offshore tax havens. The Panama free trade agreement will make this bad situation much worse. Each and every year, the wealthiest people in this country and the largest corporations evade about $100 billion in taxes through abusive and illegal offshore tax havens in Panama and in other countries.”
Clinton, on the other hand, completely ignored the tax haven issue, and instead, regurgitated the same job-creation platitude she used to peddle NAFTA, which has decimated American manufacturing jobs and led to an economic refugee crisis in Mexico.
Beyond just exposing her unwillingness to understand how modern free trade agreements benefit the rich and punish impoverished countries, Clinton may have a more nefarious connection to the Panama Papers.
In lobbying for the Panama-United States Trade Promotion Agreement, Clinton paved the way for major banks and corporations, most notably the Deutsche Bank, to skirt national laws and regulations. After she resigned as Secretary of State, the Deutsche Bank paid her $485,000.00 for a speech. While criminality can’t yet be definitively established, this may change when the “Süddeutsche Zeitung” publishes its comprehensive list at the end of the month. In addition to the aforementioned connection, Clinton’s name has already surfaced in connection to billionaire and a Russian controlled bank named in the files.
The fallout from the Panama Papers is being felt around the world. On Tuesday, Iceland’s Prime Minister resigned after it was revealed his family had used a shell company to hold millions of dollars worth of bonds in a collapsed bank. After an interview in which Prime Minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson had a meltdown when asked about the company’s assets, over 20,000 citizens of Iceland protested.
How does this lead to Bernie Sanders defeating Hillary Clinton? The Sanders campaign has been run on the premise that Clinton is inextricably linked to political corruption, disastrous military interventions, and collusion with Wall Street. If it can be shown that Clinton was involved in criminal improprieties exposed by the Panama Papers, this will constitute yet another major line of attack for Sanders headed into theApril 14th debate in New York. If Sanders wins the New York primary a few days later and scoops up a proportion of its 247 delegates, the narrative of the election will dramatically shift.
When added to the myriad other Clinton scandals and political vulnerabilities, the Democratic party’s gatekeeper super delegates could decide that Clinton is too big of a liability going into the general election. It all comes down to New York, though — Sanders must win New York. If he does, you will see historic chaos unleashed upon the American electorate. And if the Panama Papers leak sets off an unstoppable domino effect, the DNC may soon find its fractured party looking just as ghoulish as the clown’s autopsy being conducted on the Republican Party.
Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton;s Campaign
Spot Dog Loves to eat Illuminati – Zionist – Satanists.
By Stew Webb
Click on the link below to view the details of their full investigations.
On the morning of September 11, 2001 a Jersey City, N.J. housewife named Maria was making coffee in her kitchen when she received a phone call from a neighbor who excitedly told her to look out the window. When Maria looked she was shocked to see a plume of smoke rising from the World Trade Center about a mile away across the Hudson River. Quickly Maria grabbed some binoculars and stepped out onto the balcony of her high-rise apartment, known as the Doric Towers, which afforded an excellent view of lower Manhattan. Maria did not yet know that a commercial airliner had plowed into the north tower of the World Trade Center, but it was obvious that an ugly tragedy was in progress.
As she watched, she noticed three men in the parking lot below who were behaving strangely. They were sitting or kneeling on the roof of a white panel truck and, like her, were watching the stricken World Trade Center. Oddly, however, the three men were celebrating. They were smiling and laughing, giving high-fives, taking photos, and one looked to be filming the World Trade Center as it burned. Their inappropriate behavior made Maria suspicious and, a few minutes later, when the men drove off in the van, she copied down their license plate number. When her husband returned home from jury duty, she discussed the matter with him, then, called the police and reported what she had seen.
At 3:31 p.m., the FBI put out a “be on the lookout” (BOLO) all points bulletin and, about an hour later, East Rutherford police officers Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli identified the white van, then stopped it on Rt. 3, near Giants stadium. The cops approached and instructed the occupants to exit the vehicle, but the driver refused and the officers, now with guns drawn, had to physically remove the occupants (there were now five of them). The men were hand-cuffed, read their rights, and taken into custody.
All of them were between 22-27 years of age. Their names were Sivan Kurzburg, his brother Paul Kurzburg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. The driver [Sivan Kurzburg] reportedly told officer DeCarlo, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”i Another occupant falsely said, “We were on the West Side highway in New York City during the incident.”
A search of the vehicle turned up several passports, cameras, rolls of film, a sock stuffed with $4700 in cash, backpacks, notebooks and, according to the Bergen Record, “maps of the city with certain places highlighted….It looked like they were hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.”ii This story in the local newspaper was prescient, because the issue of foreknowledge would preoccupy the subsequent FBI investigation. The question was eventually answered, though as we will learn, not by the FBI.
The five Israelis claimed to be tourists temporarily employed by a local moving company, Urban Moving Systems (UMS), based in Weehawken, N.J. The owner of the business was also an Israeli, 31-year old Dominik Suter whom FBI agents briefly questioned, before Suter fled to Israel with his family. At that point, the FBI obtained a warrant and searched the UMS premises. They found evidence of Suter’s hasty departure, uneaten sandwiches, cell phones and half-full coffee cups, as well as stored furniture and the belongings of numerous customers who had been left hanging. FBI agents seized documents and at least fifteen computers.
The FBI placed the five Israelis in a federal detention center, isolated them from one other, and began to interrogate them closely. The investigation was driven by numerous discrepancies in their accounts, and by the men’s strange behavior in the period before the second plane impact when everyone still assumed that the first crash was simply a tragic accident. Some of the Israelis were given as many as seven lie-detector tests in an effort to determine if they had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. One, Paul Kurzburg, refused for weeks to take a lie-detection test, then agreed to take it, and promptly failed it.iii
During interrogation, the Israelis reportedly explained why they were happy that morning. They said it was because “the United States would now have to commit itself to fighting [Middle East] terrorism, that Americans would have an understanding and empathy for Israel’s circumstances, and that the attacks were ultimately a good thing for Israel.”iv As we know, Likud-leader Benjamin Netanyahu made a similar comment when asked about 9/11. “It’s very good,” Netanyahu told the press, then back-tracked, “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel.”v
The FBI investigation took a serious turn when two of the men turned up in a US national intelligence database, indicating they were known Mossad agents. Mossad is the Israeli equivalent of the CIA. Also, two of the men (it is not clear if these were the same two) were found to be in possession of round-trip airline tickets. The two had arrived in the US from Tel Aviv via Athens on June 15, 2001, and were scheduled to return to Israel on September 12, 2001, the day after the attacks.vi Was the suspicious timing of their planned departure just a coincidence?
In March 2002, an un-named high-ranking US intelligence official told The Forward, a venerable New York Jewish newspaper, that the FBI concluded at the end of its investigation that the Israelis arrested in New Jersey had been conducting a Mossad surveillance mission on September 11, and that their employer, Urban Moving Systems, served as a front.vii
ABC News conducted its own probe and reported a similar view on the network’s prime-time show 20/20.viii During a taped interview with co-hosts Barbara Walter and John Miller, the Israeli detainees’ attorney, Steve Gordon, made a belated attempt at damage-control. Gordon said his clients denied the news reports that that they had been celebrating, or rejoicing, or even horsing around, that morning. But Gordon’s attempt to spin the story in a more favorable light remained at odds with the evidence found in the white van, namely, rolls of film plus the film pulled from three cameras, which when developed by the FBI appeared to confirm exactly what Maria first told police. The Israelis had taken portrait shots of one another with the burning World Trade Center in the background, and plainly were in a festive mood. The FBI never found the alleged videocamera, however.ix
ABC consultant Vince Cannistraro, who formerly had served as CIA chief of counter-terrorism operations, later told journalist Christopher Ketcham that “the question that most troubled FBI agents in the weeks and months after 9/11 was whether the Israelis had arrived at the site of their ‘celebration’ with foreknowledge of the attack to come.” According to Cannistraro, “From the beginning, the FBI investigation operated on the premise that the Israelis had foreknowledge.”x
The FBI report
Such a conclusion is consistent with the FBI report on the case, or rather, with the small part of it that was made public in 2011. Most of the FBI report, some 1280 pages or more in length, remains classified and will not be released until 2035. But even from the lesser part that has been declassified, it is evident that the FBI uncovered some disturbing material linking the Israelis to 9/11, material that was never reported by the US news media.xi
For instance, the report mentions that the FBI received information from its Miami office that one of the 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers had utilized another Israeli-run moving company, Classic International Movers (CIM), also based in New Jersey. It seems that a number of Israeli-owned moving companies were operating in the New York area. Curiously, CMI’s telephone number turned up in one of the notebooks found in the white van, all of which prompted the FBI to detain and interview four CIM employees. The four were Israelis and had served in the Israeli military; and all four had entered the US from various locations in South America.xii Although the outcome of the expanded investigation cannot be determined from the heavily censored FBI report, the connection to the 19 hijackers must have alarmed US intelligence experts. If Mossad agents were shadowing Arab terrorists in the US, it possibly meant the Israelis had prior actionable intelligence about the 9/11 attacks which they did not share with US officials.
In another case, the FBI interviewed a former Urban Moving Systems employee who said he had quit Urban “due to a high amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban’s employees.” The former worker stated that, in addition to Israelis, UMS also employed Russians, Hungarians, and other foreign nationals. But the Israelis always spoke Hebrew among themselves and held frequent meetings in the company office, to which “he and the other non-Jewish employees were never invited.” The man said that “an Israeli employee of Urban had once remarked, ‘Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your country’.” I hasten to add, this is straight out of the FBI report. I am not making this up, nor embellishing.xiii
The same individual also offered a glimpse into the moving operation that could explain why UMS owner Dominik Suter fled the country. The former employee called Suter a “crook” and described how he “would have the delivery teams fill up the trucks with empty boxes, because he [Suter] would charge the customers by cubic feet. He [Suter] would also have some employees stay on the trucks when they were weighed so that he could charge more.”xiv If this is true, and Suter was engaging in shady business practices, it might explain why he fled. Suter might have feared exposure and possible prosecution.
The testimony of the plainly disgruntled individual must be treated with skepticism, yet, one of the Israeli detainees (I will refer to him as the “5th Israeli”) corroborated some of what he said. The fifth Israeli told the FBI that most of the foreign nationals employed at UMS lacked the necessary work-visas, which means that Dominik Suter made a practice of hiring illegals, and based on the testimony of his own workers, it’s clear he exploited their illegal status, paying sub-standard wages under the table, while avoiding payroll taxes. Suter definitely had cause for concern. Yet, as the reader is about to learn, his flight was also undoubtedly motivated by a much more serious matter.
In the end, despite considerable evidence to the contrary, the FBI concluded “that the five Israelis most likely did not possess prior knowledge of the WTC events.”xv On November 20, 2001, the detainees were served a deportation order for visa violations, then escorted from a US immigration and naturalization center in Brooklyn to JFK international airport where they were put on a flight to Tel Aviv. Once safely back in Israel, three of the men went on a national television show, and during the interview one, Oded Ellner, told his audience that “Our purpose was to document the event,”xvi which of course implies foreknowledge. Ellner’s public admission reduced the FBI investigation to absurdity. Unfortunately, from there it gets worse, because the rest of the story is almost too terrible to contemplate. Yet, face it we must.
The fifth Israeli
It seems that one of the five Israeli detainees did not know enough to keep his mouth shut, probably because he was not a member of the core Mossad group, hence, was not in the loop. This fifth Israeli was apparently just a guy, a poor shmuck who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. According to the FBI report, the man broke down and sobbed repeatedly under interrogation, not what you would expect of a Mossad operative. The man told the FBI he barely knew the four other Israelis who were in the van with him at the time of the arrest, and did not even know their last names. Evidently, this fifth man was one of two Johnny-come-late-lies who joined the group after the high-fivers left the parking lot below Maria’s apartment.xvii
This odd man out gave the FBI the fullest account of any of the detainees. He described in considerable detail the events of that morning; how he first noticed smoke pouring from the World Trade Center while en route to work; and how he arrived at UMS late, between 9:15 – 9:20 a.m., whereupon, he reported to the box packaging area in the UMS warehouse for some scheduled training. Apparently, the man was still a novice mover. He further explained that around 11 a.m. one of the other Israelis came in and announced that “they are taking down the second building,” at which point everyone in the warehouse hurried up to the roof to watch the mind-boggling spectacle. The fifth Israeli told the FBI that (and I quote) “at the time [he, the fifth man] believed that the authorities had purposely collapsed the building to prevent the additional damage that would be caused by the building tumbling to its side. It was not until later that night when he saw a TV news report in jail that he realized that the planes had caused the buildings’ collapse.” This is verbatim from the FBI report.
Looking back with unblinkered hindsight, it’s clear that the naive fifth Israeli heard it right the first time from the other Israeli who knew the truth: that the World Trade Center was being systematically demolished in plain view of the whole world.
Today, fifteen years after the fact, we know it was a demolition thanks to the independent research of some highly motivated scientists, engineers and truth-tellers, who over the years have gathered an overwhelming amount of evidence, proving beyond a reasonable doubt that explosives were used.xviii The basics have been known since at least 2007, when the physicist Steven E. Jones found explosive residues in samples of World Trade Center dust.xix
Some of the evidence for explosives was actually compiled on the morning of “the attacks.” Indeed, it was being gathered at Hoboken, N.J., on the shore of the Hudson, even as the Israelis celebrated on the roof of the UMS warehouse a mile or more upriver at Weehawken. When Rick Siegel heard about the tragedy unfolding in lower Manhattan, he hustled to the Hoboken waterfront, set up his videocamera on a tripod, and began shooting. Over the next two hours, Siegel diligently filmed both collapses, but even more importantly, he captured an audio record of the enormous rumbling explosions that ripped through the towers in the moments before they fell.xx
Thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of shocked local residents who were also watching from the Jersey shore that morning must have heard the same enormous explosions, as did many more in lower Manhattan. Yet, not one of these Americans was ever asked to appear before the official 9/11 investigations and describe what he or she saw and heard, that morning.
Siegel’s audio-video tape is almost as shocking on replay as the events of that day. The slightly muffled but nonetheless unmistakable sounds of huge multiple blasts carried quite well for more than two miles across the open water of the Hudson River. Siegel’s audio record is yet more corroborating evidence refuting the fiction that has pervaded the US media ever since: that plane impacts and fires brought down the twin towers. No way, we were deceived. The official story about 9/11 is probably the most monstrous lie ever perpetrated upon the American people.
The Mossad team based in Weehawken not only had, by its own admission, foreknowledge of the “attacks,” the testimony in the FBI’s own report, as I have attempted to show, suggests that the Israelis also knew, that very morning, that the World Trade Center was being demolished with explosives.
Standing truth on its ear
Oded Ellner’s brazen admission that “our purpose was to document the incident” may have played well in Israel, but it raised a number of urgent questions for Americans, questions that still need answers. First and foremost: how did the FBI come to embarrass itself so badly? Indeed, how could the FBI have reached a conclusion 180 degrees from the truth? Especially since its investigation, judging from the portion of the FBI report that is available, appears to have been on track, at least initially.
I suspect the answer is rather simple. Although the FBI had all of the necessary resources to do its work, it was hamstrung by the official story and thus, was unable to pursue leads that would have led to the truth. The idea of a demolition was so far out of bounds as to be unthinkable. This no doubt also explains why the FBI declassified the fifth Israeli’s eyewitness account. The FBI censor evidently failed to comprehend the significance of the man’s testimony, pointing to the use of explosives.
But the FBI was also shut down from above. A source at ABC News told journalist Chris Ketcham that “there is a lot of frustration inside the bureau about this case. They feel the higher echelons torpedoed the investigation….Leads were not fully investigated.”xxi
ABC reported that a settlement was finally reached in the case after “high level negotiations between Israeli and US government officials.”xxii According to former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vince Cannistraro, “there is no question but that [the order to close down the investigation] came from the White House. It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11. Bear in mind, this was a political issue, not a law enforcement or intelligence issue.”xxiii
The travesty I have just described incriminates then-president G.W. Bush and VP Dick Cheney. We are left to ponder their obvious treachery, and the following incendiary question: how did the Mossad team in New Jersey know in real time that the Twin Towers were being demolished with explosives?
The second updated and expanded edition of Mark H. Gaffney’s 2012 book Black 9/11 will be released later this year. Reach Mark for comment at firstname.lastname@example.org
i This was widely reported by many different sources.
ii Paulo Lima, “Five men detained as suspected conspirators,” Bergen Record, September 12, 2001.
iii ABC News, 20/20 with Barbara Walters and John Miller, June 21, 2002.
iv Christopher Ketcham, “What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?”, Counterpunch, March 7, 2007.
vii Marc Perelman, “Discussion of the Dancing Israelis,” Forward, March 15, 2001.
viii ABC News, 20/20 with Barbara Walters and John Miller, June 21, 2002.
ix The matter of the videocamera was never resolved. The FBI never found the video-cam, but neither did it find reason to question the reliability of the witness Maria, who in repeated interviews never changed her story. In fact, Maria gave a very detailed description of what she saw. She described the video-cam as a small handheld unit with a liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. She also recalled that one of the men was holding it up to his face, moving the camera slowly from side to side, or, as she put it, “panning the area.” FBI Report, section one.
x Christopher Ketcham, “What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?”, Counterpunch, March 7, 2007.
Illuminati Zionist Satanic Baby Killing Punk Larry A. Mizel of Denver, Colorado
By Stew Webb
Larry Mizel is one of the most Notorious Jewish Gangsters ever to live, following in the footsteps of Meyer Lansky and Leonard Millman, Larry Mizel has escaped Justice through pay offs and Bribes of Public Officials, Justice Department Employees, Congressman and Senators, FBI, DEA, and others agents and agency Chiefs and what is even more off the charts those Bribed got to keep their Bribes.
Larry Mizel paid a hefty fine in 1997 in a special Grand Jury and walked with out Jail.
Larry Mizel has been at the top and involved in every Major Financial Crime since 1968 and he is still walking and breathing at at the Helm of HSBC Bank a subsidiary of Great West Life Insurance Company of Englewood, Colorado. Larry Mizel also runs over 5,000 other companies including M.D.C. Holding, Inc. of Denver aka Richmond American Homes NYSE: MDC.
Larry Mizel is a Director of the American Israel Political Action Committee “AIPAC” which is nothing more than Israeli Espionage against the United States of America and has bought most of the US Congress and Senate with Political Campaign Contributions.
Illuminati Human Sacrifices June 21 and December 20-22 every year in Denver, Colorado George HW Bush, Larry Mizel, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Rabbi Answar Bin Shari of Israel, Meyer Rothchild, and the other 12 Diciples of Satan are there Killing an Infant and drinking its blood as a Ritual to Satan. http://www.stewwebb.com/?s=Illuminati+Human+Sacrifice&submit=Go
HSBC comes up short in Money Laundering Vigilance, U.S. says
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, April 1 (Reuters) – HSBC Holdings Plc has not done enough to thwart money laundering, despite making significant progress since reaching a landmark 2012 anti-money-laundering settlement with U.S. prosecutors, a federal monitor has found.
The monitor “remains unable to certify that the bank’s compliance program is reasonably designed and implemented to detect and prevent violations of AML and sanctions laws,” U.S. Attorney Robert Capers in Brooklyn, New York said in a letter filed on Friday with the federal court there.
“Although HSBC made significant progress last year, the monitor believes that the bank continues to face significant challenges,” Capers added.
The London-based bank has spent three years upgrading its oversight of customer transactions, after reaching a $1.92 billion settlement of U.S. Department of Justice charges tied to money laundering.
Prosecutors said HSBC failed to spot suspicious activity related to Mexican and Colombian drug cartels, and handled transactions for customers in countries subject to U.S. sanctions, such as Myanmar, Cuba and Iran.
As part of the settlement, HSBC entered a five-year deferred prosecution agreement and agreed to monitoring by Michael Cherkasky, the executive chairman of compliance firm Exiger and a former prosecutor.
The Justice Department could prosecute HSBC or extend the monitoring if the bank fails to live up to its commitments.
“HSBC remains focused on fulfilling its obligations under the DPA and implementing the most effective standards globally to combat financial crime,” bank spokesman Rob Sherman said.
According to Capers, Cherkasky found that HSBC in 2015 made “commendable progress” toward improving oversight, spending more than $680 million and adding 2,584 compliance personnel, and was “especially complimentary of HSBC’s ‘tone at the top.'”
But Cherkasky also found that HSBC’s monitoring and testing capabilities suffer from “immaturity,” and affiliates in some countries have struggled to obtain information about customers when opening accounts or updating account profiles, Capers said.
The monitor also believes “a great deal of work remains to be done” in improving technology, Capers said, and flagged instances where computer deficiencies left HSBC short of data needed to help detect high-risk transactions.
Cherkasky declined to comment.
His reports have been filed under seal with the Brooklyn court. HSBC and the Justice Department have appealed an order by U.S. District Judge John Gleeson to make his work public.
Gleeson left the bench last month for private practice. U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly now oversees the HSBC case.
The case is U.S. v. HSBC Bank USA NA et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 12-cr-00763. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
Here is the latest on Bill Clinton, Scott Walker, Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney and George HW Bush.
Skull and Bones man Bill Clinton Scott Walker Jeb Bush Ted Cruz Revealed
We can report that George HW Bush Stooge CIA Bill Clinton as well as the Clinton Foundation are nowa target of the FBI Criminal investigation into the use of an illegal private server located at Bill Clinton and Lesbian Hillary Clinton private residence in New York State.
Note: its pay for play involving the Nations of Saudi Arabia, UAE, and the Nation of Switzerland.
We can also divulge that Republican Governor of Wisconsin Skull and Bonesman Scott Walker and his third cousin Jeb Bush are planning to steal the Republican nomination from Donald Trump and create a all Skull and Bones Republican ticket aka Scott Walker and Jeb Bush at a rigged Republican National Convention.
Note: Scott Walker along with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney are Bag Men along with Micheal Contrell in the continued Money Laundering of Stolen U.S. Treasury Funds Re; The Wanta Reagan Mitterand Protocalls tied to HSBC Bank of Englewood, Colorado a subsidiary of Great West Life Assurance Company of Englewood and a Major Financial Foreign Currency Clearing Houses.
Note: The CME Group in Chicago, ILL.
At this hour the Legendary Michigan and Tennessee Flag Officers remain enraged Objective the destruction of the Bush Clinton Mizel totally compromised CIA and NSA.
Stay tuned for Emergency Updates at any moment we are currently working on a story involving a Jamaican Child Whore house attended by both Bill Clinton and Ted Cruz, in which Bill Clinton engaged in Sex with underage Black Hookers.
At Skull and Bones, Bush’s Secret Club Initiates Ream Gore
It’s the primal scene of American power, of Bush family values. For two centuries, the initiation rite of Skull and Bones has shaped the character of the men who have shaped the American character, including two Presidents named Bush.
And last Saturday, April 14–for the first time ever–that long-secret rite was witnessed by a team of outsiders, including this writer.
Using high-tech night-vision video equipment able to peer through the gloom into the inner courtyard of the Skull and Bones “Tomb” in New Haven, The Observer team witnessed:
The George W. effect: intoxicated by renewed proximity to Presidential power, a robed Bonesman posing as George W. harangued initiates in an eerily accurate Texas drawl: “I’m gonna ream you like I reamed Al Gore” and “I’m gonna kill you like I killed Al Gore.”
Privileged Skull and Bones members mocked the assault on Abner Louima by crying out repeatedly, “Take that plunger out of my ass!”
Skull and Bones members hurled obscene sexual insults (“lick my bumhole”) at initiates as they were forced to kneel and kiss a skull at the feet of the initiators.
Other members acted out the tableau of a throat-cutting ritual murder. http://observer.com/index.php?s=At+Skull+and+Bones%2C+Bush%27s+Secret+Club+Initiates+Ream+Gore+&x=12&y=12 http://observer.com
The secret society that ties Bush and Kerry
Revelations that leading candidates for the US presidency were “Skull and Bones” members have provoked claims of elitism. Charles Laurence reports from New York.
The “tomb” stands dark and hulking at the heart of the Yale University campus, almost windowless, and shuttered and padlocked in the thick snow of winter storms.
Yale’s candidates for the White House pictured in their student days and the ‘Skull and Bones’ mascot Built to mimic a Greco-Egyptian temple, it is the headquarters of the Order of the Skull and Bones, America’s most elite and elusive secret society and it has become the unlikely focus of this year’s presidential election. It turns out that four leading contestants for the White House in November’s election were 1960s undergraduates at Yale: President Bush and Democratic rivals Governor Howard Dean, Sen John Kerry and Sen Joseph Lieberman.
What is more, two are “Bonesmen”. Both Sen Kerry, now the Democrat front runner, and President Bush belong to the 172-year-old society, which aims to get its members into positions of power. This presidential election seems destined to become the first in history to pit one Skull and Bones member against another.
The phenomenon of the “Yalies”, as Yale alumni are known, has provoked an intense debate over apparent elitism among Americans amazed that – in a democracy of almost 300 million people – the battle for power should be waged among candidates drawn from the 4,000 who graduated from Yale in four different years of the 1960s.
“To today’s Yale undergraduates it seems quite extraordinary,” said Jacob Leibenluft, a student and a reporter on the Yale Daily News, the campus newspaper. “For some it’s a source of pride, to others it’s a source of shame.”
In fact Yale, with annual tuition fees of $28,400 (£16,000), has long sent graduates to the top of all professions from the campus in New Haven, Connecticut, where it was founded in 1731.
The Skull and Bones is the most exclusive organisation on campus. Members have ranged from President William Taft to Henry Luce, the founder of the Time-Life magazine empire, and from Averill Harriman, the businessman and diplomat, to the first President George Bush.
Alexandra Robbins, a Yale graduate and author of a book on the Skull and Bones, Secrets of the Tomb, said: “It is staggering that so many of the candidates are from Yale, and even more so that we are looking at a presidential face-off between two members of the Skull and Bones. It is a tiny club with only 800 living members and 15 new members a year.
“But there has always been a sentiment at Yale to push students into public service, an ethos of the elite making their way through the corridors of power – and the sole purpose of the Bones is power.”
We at StewWebb.com are beginning to sound like a typical Washington Soap Opera.
Put your seat belts on a lot more to come and we hope to wake up the younger Generation 18-40.
Ted Cruz Prostitution Secrets Reveled March 29, 2016
Ted Cruz thought Donald Trump was the biggest roadblock on his journey to the White House, but RadarOnline.com has learned he’s now facing an even more terrifying threat: This afternoon, an individual purporting to be a representative of the hacker group Anonymous posted a disturbing Twitter video that threatens to expose ‘very dirty secrets’ including information about Cruz ‘visiting prostitutes!’
“Your lying during this presidential campaign has gotten out of control,” the chilling video begins.
A voice alleges, “You have committed voter fraud to steal votes that do not belong to you … The fraud you have committed against Mr. [Ben] Carson will not be tolerated.”
“Anonymous will not let this go without repercussions or consequences,” the video states. “We will not sit and watch the citizens of America fall for it any longer.”
“Almost every word that comes out of your mouth is a complete lie … and you, Mr. Cruz, have been hiding behind some very dirty secrets that lie beneath the surface … secrets that you believed would never haunt you.”
“It’s time that we tell America what’s hiding behind the curtain,” the voice states, taunting, “… Do you recall visiting prostitutes?” (The clip offers no suggestion or proof that Cruz actually did consort with hookers, however.)
Finally, the video ends with an ultimatum: “Mr. Cruz, we are now demanding that you exit this race within 24 hours, or Anonymous will release all of the information we have found … Your so-called underground hacks that you think were done in the dark will be brought out for all the public to see …Your disgusting behavior … will go viral on every social media platform.”
Anonymous has not officially claimed authorship of the video.
The Website below triggered my virus protection it is wise to read below and not go there…
Interview with a
Candy Wrapper, the
Posted by AVENGERSOCIAL on MARCH 26, 2016
t’s not often, I do a story myself. I have a team writers so I
don’t have to. This leaves me the freedom to investigate and
track leads. But this story is so hot, I felt I should do this one.
If you have been on twitter #cruzsexscandal has been over
the top and widely circulated but let’s not forget the
anonymous video released that promised if Cruz did not drop
out his dirty secrets would come out. I can say this day has
come, given the release from the National Enquirer. But
Avenger has a leg up on everyone. Our anonymous source
found one of the alleged escorts who Ted Cruz frequented.
Her picture released in our previous story is not how she looks
today. Let’s call her Jane Doe.
We were given the exclusive interview done by the detective
that found her. We will not disclose her real identity nor her
location, since the initial leak she has gone off the radar. She
was found in a West Texas trailer park after a former escort
feared that she would too become part of this drama and gave
up her location. As promised, both identities are strictly
confidential and shall remain anonymous. For now, we are
just releasing some parts of this explosive transcript. An
excerpt of his interview with our Jane Doe is transcribed
below. Be forewarned it’s explosive. While we believe 100%
that is true, we’re are advised to refer to the statements below
as allegations. I do have the video of this conversation. Our
job is to shed light and not to master.
Detective: As agreed during our interview, your identity and
location will be kept secret, as sworn and recorded. When,
did you first meet Ted Cruz?
Jane Doe: 2004, I was 18 and my regular client in Dallas
gave him the contact. It is not unusual for this to happen,
many clients for the service I worked with are lobbyist,
donors, attorneys and politicians. That is why, I am scared
for my life that you found me.
Detective: I will not disclose any location or your true
identity, I found you because one of your former clients
gave me the information. That led me to one of your
associates that brought me here. I did this because if I can
find you, others can as well. This interview is only to
assure you are who they say you are. Your face will be not
shown, nothing will be asked to directly identify you.
Detective: Did Ted Cruz ever tell you he was married?
Jane Doe: Some clients do and some do not, he never
said anything about being married. He seemed to need
mothering of some sort, before we engaged in some of his
Detective: Requested acts?
Jane Doe: sometimes I would dress as a catholic school
girl for role play, that is popular with many clients though.
Other times he would request for me to dress like a judge.
Detective: I see, so would you say he is odd than other
Jane Doe: Who am I to judge my clients? I just do what, I
am paid for and go on my way.
Detective: What locations would you meet him?
Jane Doe: Houston/Dallas and I have been to Alexandria
Jane Doe: Yes
Detective: How many times would he visit you within a
Jane Doe: In the beginning, it was every time he had
business in either of the locations. He would even pay for
my flights to Baltimore then rent a car for me to drive to
Detective: Have you ever seen his wife?
Jane Doe: Yes, many times were close calls. I guess that
is why I am terrified how I was found.
Detective: I only found you because of your
friend/associate. I think she is about to leave as well.
Jane Doe: After this, I will have to move again. I am
leaving Texas and I wished I had never met him. I never
experienced this kind of problem as an escort. I knew,
when he said he was going to run for president that I would
be at risk. As a senator, I was not worried. I have met
many politicians doing this service but never had my life
been at risk.
Detective: You have my contact so you can reach me if
you need help. Let’s get back to talking about Ted more.
Did anyone give you a specific phone at any time for
Jane Doe: yes, until recently. I was getting weird calls with
no way to call it back. The number would be local and I
would answer to silence. None of the calls were of the
same number, so I threw away the phone.
Detective: So, you are saying this is why you feel
Has he ever called you recently?
Jane Doe: Yes, it is why I feel threatened and No, he has
not called since January. This is when all the strange calls
At this time, we are deciding to either pass this on to
syndicated publication or what are our legal options. We will
update once a decision is made.
Posted by JAYBYRDTOLDTWEETY on MARCH 16, 2016
With all of the massive buzz of #OPCruz video from the
hacktivist group anonymous warning Ted Cruz to drop out or
will be exposed for indulging with prostitutes. Out of the blue,
we were given the exclusive. Here is the actual tweet from
Avenger was given this complete story by submission and we
are the first to break this story. First we must break down how
this was found. An attorney from Texas, Mr. Hail relinquished
a phone to Ted Cruz which has direct contact with a prostitute
known as Felicia. As we were given this information, the story
is developing as this story is being published. We visited the
anonymous account that posted the video to compare
information if any released. We found only an image of Felicia
and where it was indicated she wore a locket with Cruz’s
image on it. Image is below.
We do have the actual image of Felicia below. By comparison
images are identical except for the locket.
We believe the Ted Cruz camp is well aware the allegations
caught fire on twitter over 24 hours ago. For those in the
media claiming Trump spokesperson Katrina Pierson is having
an affair with Ted Cruz should know, we do have all the
evidence that Katrina is free and clear of those allegations.
While we sort through this information, we will release the full
number that is tied between Cruz and Felicia. We have
intentionally redacted the number for now (5**) 23*-***8 given
this was handed late tonight. It will take sometime to
completely process this enormous amount of recorded
information given to Avenger. More to come!
Ted Cruz Mother Eleanor Darragh Birth Certificate in Question.
CNN interview with Candy Crowley, Ted Cruz himself says “My mother was born in Wilmington Delaware”.
We at Codefore were amused with the birth certificate posted by the Breibart Blog.
Breibart claims that the mother of Ted Cruz, Eleanor Darragh, was born in Wilmington Delaware and therefore Ted Cruz is a US Citizen.
Breibart says, (Darragh Ted Cruz’s mother) “ was born in Delaware on Nov. 23, 1934, establishing her citizenship by birth–and, according to U.S. law, that of her son, even though he was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on Dec. 22, 1970.”
Not so Fast Breibart.
CNN interview with Candy Crowley, Cruz himself says “ My mother was born in Wilmington Delaware.”
The National news media is assuming that since his mother was born in Delaware and that makes her a US Citizen therefore Ted Cruz is a US Citizen. . No one that we could find has checked out his mother, Mrs. Eleanor Darragh’s birth certificate in the State of Delaware. The claim is that on the Cruz birth certificate Eleanor Wilson is named as his mother and that she received the name Wilson due to a previous marriage. Cruz claims that his mother’s maiden name is Darragh. For now we will assume that this is correct. But is the Darragh birth certificate credible? The birth certificate posted by Breibart is the same as the one that Codefore received from the State of Delaware archives.
We decided to take a look at the birth certificate. Briebart claims that Cruz’s birth certificate lists a woman named Eleanore Elizabeth Wilson (Cruz.s mother). As you can see from the birth document, the name of Cruz;s mother is Elizabeth Cekine and the father is Edward J Darragh. They named their child Eleanor Darragh. For now Codefore will not take issue with the names on the Document. For PDF click HERE
As a disclaimer we remind the readers that the document we looked at was taken from the Breibart web site. Breibart claims that it is a copy of an original document. Codefore verified Breibart’s claim and obtained this document from the State of Delaware. We at Codefore are not professional document examiners and our opinions are based on visual computer inspection. However JD Benish of Codeforeblog is a retired police investigator and has had the opportunity to have seen many forged documents during his career. Additionally we at Codefore have access to people that know their way around Adobe Photo shop and other similar photo editing software. These people were invited to take a look at the document also.
We began by enhancing the photograph with filters to make the official looking stamps easier to read and to expose possible color difference.
There are several items on this document that indicate that the document has been created after the advent of photograph editing capabilities. There are also items on this document that indicate that one of the date stamps has been altered, and that both date stamps existed on the document before the document form was created and the hand written information was added.
These items are as follows:
a.We will begin by assuming that the document form was pre-printed on or prior to November 23rd, 1934. We will also assume that some time after that the form was filled out and signed and the date stamps were put there to authenticate the date of birth. Based on these assumptions we assume that the vertical page border on the left side of the document was a part of the original pre-printed form. A visual inspection indicates that there are several portions of the form wherein the form itself appears to overlap the date authentication stamps.
b.The words “PLACE OF BIRTH” slightly overlaps the stamp that says “Delaware, Jan 11 1935 Department” In particular the word “Department” is overlapped. We assume that the words “Place of Birth” were a part of the original printed document and if so, the date stamp should over lap the word “Department” not the opposite.
c.The same situation exists as indicated in the above “a”. The date stamp on the upper right corner of the document is clearly overlapped by the document heading word “BIRTH”.
d.On the upper left corner of the document you will see a stamp that says “STATE BOARD OF HEALTH”. The page border on the left side of the document clearly overlaps the word “STATE” and is visible to the naked eye.
e.About one third down the left side of the document you will see the hand written word “female in the box labeled “sex”. The “f” over laps the vertical page border. Ordinarily you would expect to see this type of overlapping on a pre-printed form, but it has already been established that this page border was added after the date stamps were applied to the document because the date stamp is overlapped by the page border. If this is accurate, the hand written word “female” was added after the Page border and therefore sometime after the date stamp.
There are other suspicious inconsistencies that we see on this document.
On the box labeled “VERIFICATION OF NAME BY PARENT” the number 31 is inconsistent with all other numerical texts. The number 31 font is several sizes larger than all of the other numbers. It is highly unlikely that in 1934, the font size for this box would have been changed to a larger font than the others The number 31 is the same font size as the words “Verification of name etc:” and it is noted that this font size is the only place it is found on this document. Remember that in 1934 typewriters font size and type were all unique to the typewriter and that is assuming that this document was created using a typewriter. If the document was created by a printer the change in font sizes, in particular the number would be highly unlikely. If the document was created later on a computer, the number font size consistency with the words Verification….;would be an easy error to make.
As previously stated, filters were used to enhance the coloring of the document in particular the red date stamps. This filtering also revealed another inconsistency. You can see what, appears to be, words that are on the back side of this form. This is not uncommon on birth certificates. On box 22. “Birth place.” The color of the document has changed and is lighter and the visible wording on the back side of the document is not visible in this particular box. In fact the wording on the back side of the document is only not visible in two boxes on this document. Box number 22 and box number 13, Both these boxes indicate place of birth of the parents. The non existence of the visible wording on only these two boxes is highly suspicious and may be an indication that these boxes have been changed. When altering a document such as this, it is very difficult to match exactly the background color and if the background color is to be identical it necessitates changing the background color of the whole document to make all portions appear identical.
On the bottom right corner we noted that the signature of the physician is missing the top of the “J” and is not similar as the “J” on Jr. . This may be the result of improper stamp application but this signature does not appear to have the characteristics of a “signature stamp” however it does have the characteristics of an actual signature. If this opinion is accurate, the signature on this document may have been “cut and pasted” on the document and the top of the “J” in the name James was not properly cut.You can also see a possible cut error at the top of the letter “B” in the Doctors signature.. PDF HERE.
In the opinion of Codefore, this copy of a birth certificate is not a copy of an original unchanged 1934 document. It is a copy of a document that has been changed using modern photograph editing software. Additionally it appears that the changes were not made by a professional photograph software editor.
There is more. When it became probable that the document was fraudulent, we made further inquiries into the information contained in the document. We accessed the 1940 US Census to see if the Darragh’s actually lived at the address they reported on the birth Certificate. PDF HERE
We specifically made an effort to validate the hand written addresses on the document indicated in boxes 10 and 19. The addresses are different. Box 10 says 222 West 17th St. and Box 22 says 222 W. 7th St. There are currently two such streets in Wilmington but 222 7th St. did not exist when the 1940 US Census was conducted. This would be a possible assumption if and when the original document was edited because today there is a 222 7th St. according to Google Maps. Codefore suggests that whoever made the changes to the document didn’t do enough 1934 research. An address that exists in 2015, didn’t necessarily exist in 1934.
The problem in verifying the residents in 1934 is that there was no verification of residence for the particular year of 1934. However in 1940 when the US Census was conducted the verification survey asks the question of residence for the 5 previous years in the box labeled “Residence April 1st 1935. This would be 97 days after Ted Cruz’s mother was born. It’s the closest date verification of the Darragh family we could get at this time to the exact birth date. (we are still working on this)
At 222 W. 17th St. Wilmington, the 1940 census indicates that Mr. Edgar Welch, a fireman lived there. Welch told the census taker he had lived in this house on April 1st 1935 until present . The Census question as to the total length time Mr. Welch lived there was not asked or required. He could have possibly lived there for 10 years or more. Mr. Welch reported the he, his wife, two children and a lodger who was a barbershop owner named “John” age 32 lived there at the time the census was taken.
A 1940 name search on Darragh produced a Census document for the residence located at 1311 Loll or Toll Rd. unincorporated New Castle county known as Gordon Heights. The address could not be confirmed but the residents were Edward J. Darragh, his wife Elizabeth and children Eleanor and Caroline. Mr. Darragh claimed that all were US Citizens. This research seems to validate, somewhat, the Eleanor birth certificate but does not explain the alterations. At this time the only way to authenticate, or verify the birth certificate of Eleanor Darragh is the St. Francis Hospital Archives or the Catholic Church birth records.
With all of this information taken into consideration, the question of birth certificates should be expanded to include Ted Cruz.s mother. If his mother’s birth certificate is fraudulent then she may not have been a US Citizen. If that is the case, Ted Cruz himself is not a US Citizen naturalized or not and cannot posses a passport nor can he hold a seat in the Senate. We at Codefore are concerned that if Ted Cruz used the above Certificate of Birth to prove citizenship and or obtain a passport, who performed Cruz’s background investigation?? Based on our opinion its apparent that whoever changed this document had co-operation from someone within the Delaware Government. Their Document We also noted that included with the Birth Certificate obtained from the Delaware Archives was a transmittal sheet that indicated that it was for Eleanor E. Darragh. Nowhere in any of the documents we researched was the middle initial “E.” used to support the birth of Eleanor. This birth certificate states that Eleanor Darragh was born 1934. Was one of the changes made to the Birth Certificate erroneous?
Hillary ‘had several abortions’, kept Chelsea for political appearances: Bill’s former lover
PART II of III — Even having a child was a political calculation for Hillary Clinton, one of Bill Clinton’s former lovers says — and it’s those types of actions that she believes should give every woman pause before making Hillary the first female president.
Miller, who had a three-month affair with then Gov. Bill Clinton in 1983, recently shared with The American Mirror some of the intimate secrets Bill told her, including that even having a child was a political calculation for the current Democratic front runner for president.
“She had several abortions before she had Chelsea and it was only because Bill convinced her that if they were ever going to move up in politics that they had to have a child because that is what the political analysts had said,” Miller says.
“They’ve gotta see her as a human. They have to see her — I think in society they always say, ‘If you were a mother, you can’t be half bad. There has to be some love or gentleness or compassion within in you birth a child,’ but that’s not true.
“There’s some pretty bad mothers. I had one,” Miller says. She said her mother had abused her for years.
Referring to Clinton again, Miller tells The American Mirror, “She is a Gloria Steinem kind of feminist. If you’ve ever seen picture or heard Gloria Steinem, just a cold, conniving bitch. That’s just it.
“And they don’t care about anyone but themselves. That’s what most feminists are all about. It’s about themselves,” according to Miller.
“And most of them don’t link men, incidentally. They only use men for income (and) appearance.
“Hillary could never had made it to Washington, DC without Bill. He was the song and dance routine. He’s the one that played the sax and he could laugh and joke and talk and Hillary can’t do that.
“She can’t put on her black nightie and run around and she can’t play the sax,” Miller says, referring to her previous claim that, during their trysts, Bill Clinton would wear Miller’s nightie and play his instrument.
“I’m sure if she is a lesbian it’s not fun,” Miller says frankly.
When she was asked about where she heard Hillary Clinton was a lesbian, she responded, “Bill told me!
“Because I said why do you think she is so cold?” recalling her conversation with Bill. “Why do you think she is so uninterested in kissing and holding and just being close physically?
“He said that when she was in college that she and some girls experimented and she liked it. And that’s when the big feminist movement was moving forward and lesbianism was hot.
“It was more vogue for a woman to have a female partner than to have a male partner,” Miller says.
“She’s been an imposter all these years and yet even my own daughter said, ‘But mother, she deserves it. She’s worked for it.’
“I’ve worked for a lot of things in my life that I didn’t get. I worked to be Miss America,” the former Miss Arkansas says. “I wasn’t awarded Miss America. But did I want to go out and end other people’s lives and mistreat them because of it? No, you can’t do that.”
(RT News) – WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has spoken out against US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, calling her a “war hawk with bad judgment” who gets an “emotional rush out of killing people.”
“A vote today for Hillary Clinton is a vote for endless, stupid war,” Assange wrote via the @wikileaks Twitter account on Tuesday.
He added that he has “years of experience in dealing with Hillary Clinton and have read thousands of her cables.Hillary lacks judgment and will push the United States into endless wars which spread terrorism.”
Assange also highlighted Clinton’s “poor policy decisions,” which he said have “directly contributed”to the rise of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).
Stating that Clinton went above the heads of Pentagon generals when it came to Libya, he wrote: “Libya has been destroyed. It became a haven for ISIS. The Libyan national armory was looted and hundreds of tons of weapons were transferred to jihadists in Syria.”
He went on to state that Clinton did not learn from her mistakes, and set out to repeat history in Syria.
“Having learned nothing from the Libyan disaster Hillary then set about trying do the same in Syria. Hillary’s war has increased terrorism, killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians and has set back women’s rights in the Middle East by hundreds of years,” he wrote.
Referring to a CBS interview with Clinton in 2011, Assange expressed his disgust with her after she became “wild-eyed” and “publicly took credit for the destruction of the Libyan state,” gloating that“We came, we saw, he (Muammar Gaddafi) died!”
“In the momentary thrill of the kill, she had aped, of all people, Julius Caesar,” Assange wrote.
He concluded by saying that Clinton “shouldn’t be let near a gun shop, let alone an army. And she certainly should not become president of the United States.”
Hillary Clinton on Gaddafi: We came, we saw, he died.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has spoken out against US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, calling her a “war hawk with bad judgment” who gets an “emotional rush out of killing people.”
“A vote today for Hillary Clinton is a vote for endless, stupid war,” Assange wrote via the @wikileaks Twitter account on Tuesday.
He added that he has “years of experience in dealing with Hillary Clinton and have read thousands of her cables. Hillary lacks judgment and will push the United States into endless wars which spread terrorism.”
Assange also highlighted Clinton’s “poor policy decisions,” which he said have “directly contributed” to the rise of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).
Stating that Clinton went above the heads of Pentagon generals when it came to Libya, he wrote: “Libya has been destroyed. It became a haven for ISIS. The Libyan national armory was looted and hundreds of tons of weapons were transferred to jihadists in Syria.”
He went on to state that Clinton did not learn from her mistakes, and set out to repeat history in Syria.
“Having learned nothing from the Libyan disaster Hillary then set about trying do the same in Syria. Hillary’s war has increased terrorism, killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians and has set back women’s rights in the Middle East by hundreds of years,” he wrote.
Referring to a CBS interview with Clinton in 2011, Assange expressed his disgust with her after she became “wild-eyed” and “publicly took credit for the destruction of the Libyan state,” gloating that “We came, we saw, he (Muammar Gaddafi) died!”
“In the momentary thrill of the kill, she had aped, of all people, Julius Caesar,” Assange wrote.
He concluded by saying that Clinton “shouldn’t be let near a gun shop, let alone an army. And she certainly should not become president of the United States.”
But despite Assange’s loathing for Clinton, she is still in contention to win the Democratic nomination for the presidential election in November.
Assange wrote the memo from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been holed up for over three years after being granted asylum in order to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he faces sexual assault allegations. From Sweden, the WikiLeaks founder fears he would be extradited to the US for publishing classified US military and diplomat documents in 2010 – a move which amounted to the largest information leak in United States history.
Last week, a United Nations panel ruled that Assange has been “arbitrarily detained” in the embassy in London, and called on the UK and Sweden to end the deprivation of his liberty. Assange called the ruling “a victory that cannot be denied,”stating that the UK and Sweden had “lost at the highest level.”
However, both the UK and Sweden rejected the UN panel’s ruling. A British government spokesman said it “changed nothing,” while Sweden questioned the UN’s legal competence when it comes to “issues related to fugitives’ self-confinement, such as asylum and extradition.”
Corrupt cop Bernie Kerik and village idiot George W.
Two news stories caught my eye yesterday in the media coverage of Tuesday’s attacks in Brussels. The first was a Newsmax TV report featuring former NYC Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik giving his proposed strategy to defeat Daesh and stop future terrorist attacks. If the name Kerik rings a bell, it’s because he commanded New York’s police during 9/11. But more on that below; here’s what wisdom he had to impart:
“They [Belgian intelligence] didn’t have enough intel to figure out who they [the ‘terrorists’] were, where they were, what they were doing — and this is in the aftermath of taking down the mastermind of the Paris attacks. … The key is intelligence. Our state, local and federal authorities have to be communicating. We have to be working with those abroad.”
Thanks, Bernie, for that remarkable insight. (Hey, at least it’s better than Killary’s plan to defeat ISIS bydefeating ISIS.)
The second story was the report that one of the suspects in the attack at Brussels’ Zaventem Airport, Ibrahim El Bakraoui, left a ‘suicide letter’ or rudimentary ‘will’ on a computer that was subsequently found in a trash can during a raid by Brussels police in the Schaerbeek neighborhood. The note allegedly said: “I don’t know what to do, hunted everywhere, no longer safe” and “I don’t want to end up in a cell next to him [i.e. Salah Abdeslam, presumably].” The street in which they found the laptop allegedly was also where police found an unexploded bomb, an ISIS flag and bomb-making materials.
The story doesn’t make very much sense to me. Suicide notes or wills are written to be discovered and read. They are usually left in a conspicuous location, not thrown in the trash on some street. It’s suspicious, to say the least, and I think any responsible investigator would hold such evidence in doubt by considering all possibilities: is it legitimate? Was it planted? The fact that such possibilities are not even raised is suspicious in itself. Police worth their salt should be circumspect, not certain, in their public statements about an ongoing investigation. If they were sincere, they would let the public know any doubts they have. The fact that they do not do so suggests they have an agenda: to paint these suspects as guilty in the minds of the public without a shadow of a doubt. The same goes for their motivations: there is no doubt raised as to their premeditated intent to engage in terroristic ‘suicide bombings’, no possibility raised that their intentions may have been something else – that they were perhaps coerced, or even outright framed.
This so-called methodology has been used by law enforcement in response to ‘terror attacks’ at least since 9/11. Which brings me back to Bernie Kerik.
Bernie Kerik: Toeing the Terror Line, Covering for Mossad
On Sunday, September 16, 2001, Kerik announced the discovery of one of the alleged hijackers’ passports on the streets of New York. According to him a “passerby” came across the passport “several blocks” from the crash site. This was the passport of Satam al-Suqami. The “passerby” who allegedly discovered and turned in the passport was never identified. Here’s an image of the pristine passport in question:
The passport was obviously planted: it could not have survived the impact and explosion (in this condition, no less). Nor is it plausible for it to have been found where it was alleged to have been found. Even the Guardian‘s Anne Karpf noted how this miracle “would have tested the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI’s crackdown on terrorism.” And the lead counsel for the 9/11 Commission, Susan Ginsburg, noted that the passport had been “manipulated in a fraudulent manner in ways that have been associated with al Qaeda.”
The motive is clear. Four of the hijackers of Flight 11, which crashed into the first tower on 9/11, were initially identified as Abdul Al-Omari, Amer Kamfar, Ameer Bukhari and Adnan Bukhari (they weren’t brothers) – their names were even on the flight manifest. Adnan was a flight instructor at FlightSafety in Vero Beach, where several of the hijackers had trained. But then it turned out that Adnan was alive and well on September 12th in Florida; Ameer had died exactly one year before, on 9/11/2000; Al-Omari and Kamfar were alive and well in Saudi Arabia (they’d left the U.S. just two weeks before the attacks). Obviously, some new names were needed. Enter al-Suqami’s miraculous passport.
Was the alleged passerby even real? Or were they a figment of Kerik’s imagination? We know what Kerik would say to all this. According to him, conspiracy theorists are “retarded“. But Kerik is one to talk. He’s been called a “hero” of 9/11 and he was Bush’s top pick for head of Homeland Security. In 2003 he received a multi-million-dollar contract to train Iraqi police. But military officials later said: “His whole contribution was a waste of time and effort.” Kerik wasn’t just incompetent; he was also a criminal, engaged in corruption and conspiracies of his own.
In 2006, he pleaded guilty to two ethics violations, and in 2009 pleaded guilty to eight federal charges. By doing so, investigators were willing to overlook his other alleged wrongdoings: mortgage fraud, tax fraud, conspiracy to eavesdrop, lying on his Homeland Security application. But there’s more to the story of his tax fraud. According to the New York Times, he received a ‘loan’ for $250,000 to renovate his Bronx apartment from a New Jersey company, Interstate Industrial Corporation, which has been accused of ties to organized crime. In return for their work, they allegedly wanted a little ‘help’ obtaining a city license. After coming under scrutiny for the ‘loan’ in 2005, Kerik apparently repaid the money.
But that doesn’t give the whole story. Another NYT piece gives more detail:
In filing the charges, prosecutors with United States attorney’s office declined to identify a “wealthy Israeli industrialist” said to have financed the loan or to name the “Brooklyn businessman” said to have served as an intermediary in the transaction, referring to them only as John Doe No. 7 and John Doe No. 8.
But interviews with people who have been briefed on the transaction indicate that the industrialist was an Israeli billionaire and philanthropist, Eitan Wertheimer, whose family’s vast holdings include companies with United States Defense Department contracts. The Brooklyn businessman was Shimon Cohen, a marble and stone merchant who has been a friend of Mr. Kerik’s for several years. Mr. Wertheimer and Mr. Cohen … declined to speak about the loan or the reasons it was made to Mr. Kerik.
Two years ago, though, Mr. Cohen was interviewed by city investigators and described the 2003 loan as an informal transaction. He said that in handing the money over, he had not discussed any interest with Mr. Kerik nor set any timetable for repayment … The $250,000 loan to Mr. Kerik was provided in a personal check written by Mr. Cohen to Mr. Kerik’s wife …there was no written agreement that outlined the terms of the loan.
The indictment says that the money actually came from the wealthy industrialist, from whom Mr. Cohen had borrowed the funds. Prosecutors have not offered any explanation as to what might have brought about the transaction, or why Mr. Wertheimer did not provide the funds directly.
Mr. Wertheimer met Mr. Kerik through Mr. Cohen, a longtime friend, according to associates, and the two spent time together during Mr. Kerik’s trip to Israel in August 2001. Later that year, as he left his New York City police post, Mr. Kerik handed out 19 gold and blue enamel badges that declared the recipients “Honorary Police Commissioners,” and Mr. Wertheimer received one, as did Mr. Berman and Judith Regan, then Mr. Kerik’s lover and publisher. [HK: Kerik allegedly used an apartment near Ground Zero for his trysts with Regan – the apartment was supposed to be used by exhausted 9/11 rescue workers.] The real estate developer Steven C. Witkoff, who is listed in the indictment as John Doe No. 5, who paid more than $236,000 in rent for Mr. Kerik from 2001 to 2003, also received one of the badges.
In Israel, Mr. Wertheimer serves as chairman of Iscar Ltd., a privately held metal cutting tool business that is one of Israel’s largest companies and one that sold 80 percent of its stock last year to Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. The indictment referred to him as an industrialist whose companies “did business with the federal government.”
Wertheimer was chairman for metal-cutting tool business Iscar, Ltd., one of Israel’s largest companies. His father, Stef, former Knesset member and notorious ‘free-enterpriser’, also happens to be the second richest man in Israel. But did you catch that bit about a trip to Israel in August 2001, where he met with his money-man Wertheimer? He traveled there for four days at the end of August (video footage here). And you’ll never guess why:
Shalom, Bernie. Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik leaves tonight for a four-day trip to Israel, where he will meet with government officials to discuss anti-terror tactics and Israeli traffickers of Ecstasy pills. Kerik was invited to the violence-wracked region by Israel’s minister of public safety. Mayor Giuliani approved the trip. The visit is considered official business, so New York City taxpayers are picking up the tab. … Kerik is not bringing any NYPD terrorist or narcotics experts with him. … Referring to the Ecstasy issue, Kerik said, “I think I’ll be giving them information with regard to seizures we’ve had and intelligence we’ve had on narcotics trafficking and see if we can coordinate better or work better together to address some of these issues. There have been several federal and state prosecutions of drug dealers who are Israeli nationals, but authorities believe Israel is a transshipment point rather than a producer of the pills. Kerik himself is no stranger to the Middle East and traveled to Israel before becoming commissioner. Before joining the NYPD,he coordinated security for the Saudi royal family.
Kerik was in Jerusalem yesterday to discuss common concerns, including terrorism and narcotics trafficking, with Israeli Police Commissioner Shlomo Aharonishki. “I thought that if I’m going to come, this is the time to come and send a clear message – you can’t be intimidated by terrorism,” he said after the meeting. “People shouldn’t be afraid to come to Israel.” Kerik also assured Israeli leaders that the NYPD will remain on alert for attacks on Jewish institutions in New York as long as Israeli-Palestinian fighting continues. The department is working with the FBI and the New York State Police on an anti-terrorism task force and is on top of all potential threats, Kerik said. “We’ve been on what we call ‘enhanced alert’ for the past several months, since the violence broke out here several months ago, and we’ve been doing just fine,” he said. “That alert status will remain as is until further notice.”
Israelis arrested in the U.S. for trafficking ecstasy? In July of 2001, police in Queens busted Israeli citizens David Roash and Israel Ashkenazi with one million ecstasy pills and $187,000 in cash. Kerik and Rudy Giuliani gave the press conference. Presumably Kerik needed to talk to the Israelis regarding some ‘coordination and cooperation’ on the subject. There isn’t enough room here to get into it, but for now let me just say that the infamous cases of Israeli art students spying on DEA agents probably have something to do with Israeli organized crime/Mossad’s involvement in drug trafficking in Florida, California, Texas and New York. Some of these same art students were in very close proximity to the individuals later identified as 9/11 hijackers. It looks like the “art students” were spying on DEA agents in order to keep one step ahead of their investigations into the Israeli drug trafficking operations, not to mention shadowing the 9/11 hijackers.
In a related story, on 9/11 five Israelis (two of whom were on a counterintelligence list as potential Mossad agents, and all of whom were associated with Urban Moving Systems (a Mossad-front moving company) were arrested after being observed filming, photographing, and celebrating the burning towers. That’s also a tale too long to tell here (Ryan Dawson’s documentary The Empire Unmasked goes into detail – see also Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Joe Quinn’s9/11: The Ultimate Truth). One of the five arrested was Paul Kurzberg, who served in an “anti-terrorist unit” in the Israeli Army. In the FBI report on the investigation of these men and their actions on 9/11, it states:
Specifically, [blank=thirteen characters=Paul Kurzberg] admitted to being employed by the [blank] [blank] and further admitted attending a [blank for entire line] [blank. Blank] advised during an additional interview he was selected by the [blank, fifteen characters, confirmed below as “Jewish Agency” including quotation marks] to attend a [blank] for employees working outside the country of Israel. He advised his [blank] for the [blank] [blank] was in [blank]. Statements by [blank’s] associates corroborated this fact but also revealed that [blank, four characters, e.g. Paul] may have also been stationed in other countries as well.
Coincidentally, Eitan Wertheimer, whom Kerik visited two weeks before 9/11, and who later ‘loaned’ him $250,000, has been on the board of governors for the Jewish Agency since 2004.
In addition to the arrest of the five dancing Israelis (pulled over because of the ‘be on the lookout’ for their van), numerousreports on 9/11 said police also arrested two or three men (Israelis) in a van near the George Washington bridge that was full of explosives. The men in the van were arrested. At a press conference on 9/11, Giuliani passed off all questions relating to the Israelis and the other moving vans associated with them to Kerik, who did his best to evade and obfuscate, denying the presence of explosives and avoiding any mention of the fact that the men arrested were all Israelis:
An operation like 9/11 can’t succeed without immoral and conscienceless people like Kerik on the ground to make sure the proper narrative gets advanced, and that any contradictory facts are conveniently hushed up or covered over. So much for Kerik and 9/11. Back to Brussels.
Patsies and Laptops
Contrary to Kerik, conspiracy theories are not ‘retarded’. Conspiracies happen all the time. Western intel agencies (CIA, FBI, MI6, MI5, Mossad, etc.) have been conspiring with “Muslim extremists” for decades. That’s conspiracy fact. And it has only gotten worse in recent years. The attacks in Brussels fit the pattern: trial by media, suspects previously known to law enforcement and intelligence agencies, non-sensical targets. The only people to benefit from these attacks are the governments of the citizens who have been murdered.
Within a day, Belgian officials had released the identities of three suspects: Ibrahim and Khalid El Bakraoui and Najim Laachraoui. Early reports said that the Bakraouis were known to police for links toorganized crime, but not terrorism. While suggestive, it wasn’t exactly true, as we’ll see. Khalid reportedly entered Belgium using a false ID and rented the house that Belgian police raided (where Mohamed Belkaid was killed, and from where Abdeslam reportedly fled before being captured elsewhere). TheTelegraph provides the latest updates:
Clear links have emerged between the cells responsible for the Paris and Brussels attacks. One Brussels bomber, Khalid El Bakraoui, is believed to have rented a safe house for the Paris attackers while another, Najim Laachraoui, made the bombs used in that attack, authorities say.
Two Belgian cabinet ministers offered their resignations over security failuressurrounding one of the bombers, Ibrahim El Bakraoui. He was deported from Turkey over terrorism concerns but was not being monitored by Belgian intelligence.
An overweight middle-aged man named Khalid Zerkani and known as Papa Noel has been unmasked as a major Isil recruiter in Belgium. He has been linked to at least one of the Brussels attackers.
Ibrahim and Khalid El Bakraoui had allegedly been spying on a top Belgian nuclear official, with experts speculating that they wanted to construct a dirty bomb and one report claiming Isil was originally targeting a nuclear facility but changed course.
This information may or may not be true: I doubt we’ll see any real evidence presented one way or the other. But one thing needs to be kept in mind: any way you look at it, these guys are patsies. Whether they knew it or not, they were playing their part in a Western intelligence operation – that’s primarily what Daesh is. Let’s look at the possibilities:
Some or all of these men are innocent of the crimes in question.
Some or all of these men were coerced into carrying out the attacks.
Some or all of these men willingly and knowingly carried out the attacks.
In a state governed by the rule of law, it would take an in-depth investigation and trial to determine which of the above possibilities applies. Officials would avoid any definitive statements before the investigation had taken place. Such a thing will never happen, of course. But that doesn’t mean we should rule out the possibilities. If #1, it is possible these men were directed to the place of the attacks, unaware that explosives would be detonated and that they were the fall guys. (And that’s assuming the names of the suspects are all accurate!) If #2, the question of who planned the attacks and handled the men involved is still an open question.
The links between Khalid, Najim and the Paris attackers look flimsy at this point (if he used a false name to rent the apartment, what evidence do they have that it was actually Khalid who rented the place?). But one thing looks relatively certain: Turkish intelligence did tell Belgian authorities about Ibrahim, who was arrested in Turkey on June 14, 2015, three days after his arrival, and deported to the Netherlands on July 14. (Not only that, Khalid “was the subject of an Interpol ‘red notice,’ an alert to police forces around the world saying that he was wanted in Belgium, evidently for having violated conditions of his parole.”) According to Turkish officials (including Erdogan), the Turkish government then notified the governments of both Belgium and the Netherlands. According to Turkey’s Daily Sabah:
Turkish authorities detained El Bakraoui for using a similar route that is used by foreign militants attempting to join Daesh and being in contact with suspected terrorists, sources said.
Turkish police apprehended El Bakraoui during a routine police check to catch possible terror suspects in Turkey’s Gaziantep province and deported him from Istanbul Atatürk Airport. The Turkish official said, “We notified Belgium’s and the Netherlands’s authorities about his travel route and put an exclusion order on him.”
They even provided a scan of his passport:
Dutch officials confirmed that they had been informed about him. This prompted Belgium’s interior minister Jan Jambon and justice minister Koen Geens to offer their resignations (which were refused):
They both blame a Belgian official working in Turkey for failing to pass on intelligence that Ibrahim El Bakraoui was a potential terrorist.
“There were errors at Justice and with the (Belgian) liaison officer in Turkey,” Jambon said.
Geens said: “There is perhaps no sufficiently rapid transmission of information from Turkey, but also at a Belgian level.” … He added: “There were obviously problems with the transmission of information with the Belgian liaison officers on July 14, 2015, when El Bakraoui was deported by Turkey to the Netherlands.”
Shades of 9/11. According to Haaretz, “security services in Belgium had precise warnings about the attack on the airport and, likely, the subway as well.” The article doesn’t say who exactly provided such intel. The Israelis, perhaps? And now the Americans are jumping on the bandwagon, saying they know the identity of the third man from the CCTV footage; he was reportedly on a terror watch list, along with both El Bakraoui brothers.
While it’s unclear why Ibrahim was in Turkey, I don’t think it’s a stretch to suppose he wanted to join up with Daesh. We can’t say for certain, but it seems possible, even likely – thousands of other young Europeans have done just that. However, why was he arrested? Turkey regularly funnels militants across the border to join up with Daesh in Syria – even Daesh militants themselves describe the border as essentially open to them, since Turkey supports them. In Ibrahim’s case (like that of Brahim Abdeslam, the Paris attacker who was also arrested in Turkey), it looks like they wanted a paper trail. People like Ibrahim are disposable tools used by intelligence services. Like Lee Harvey Oswald, there is just enough evidence on record to craft a narrative that will suit the agencies’ purpose and provide some much-needed plausible deniability. The CIA has used confidential informants, agents, and low-life criminals for decades to do their dirty work, or simply as convenient tools on which to place the blame.
Unless everyone involved in the “anti-terror” raids and investigations is in on the big game, which I doubt, I don’t have a problem accepting that some or even a lot of the ‘evidence’ provided by the authorities is true. It’s entirely possible that authorities really did discover the laptop in the trash, and that it did contain a ‘suicide note’. It’s entirely possible that the named suspects really were where the authorities say they were, and even that they were involved in the attacks. But it’s important to keep in mind what that doesnot necessarily imply. Even if all these things are true (and it hasn’t been definitively shown to be true, nor do I think it will), it is still just as possible that the laptop was planted, the note was forged, and the ‘suicide bombers’ were either duped, coerced, or otherwise manipulated to participate in these attacks to whatever degree they did participate. How else are we to explain the fact that they avoided any target of strategic interest, like NATO and EU buildings in the vicinity? If targeting civilians and avoiding military/political targets really is Daesh’s strategy, isn’t it funny how that strategy happens to align perfectly with Western geopolitical interests?
Harrison Koehli hails from Edmonton, Alberta. A graduate of studies in music performance, Harrison is also an editor for Red Pill Press and has been interviewed on several North American radio shows in recognition of his contributions to advancing the study of ponerology. In addition to music and books, Harrison enjoys tobacco and bacon (often at the same time) and dislikes cell phones, vegetables, and fascists.
Bernard Kerik Visits Israel YouTube
ISIS, oil & Turkey: RT films trove of jihadist docs detailing illegal trade with Ankara (EXCLUSIVE)
Debkafile, an Israeli intelligence-linked online journal, published an article on March 24 headlined “Israeli security firm’s advice on Brussels airport security unheeded” claiming that explosives were pre-planted within the Zaventem airport in Brussels “by an advance team of terrorist operatives masquerading as airport personnel, or a staff employee.” Debkafile claims that three identical kits of explosives, AK-47s, ammunition, and hand grenades were placed throughout the airport in advance to provide the terrorists an opportunity to “strike the emergency teams, the medics, the security forces and the other first responders when they arrived to tend the victims of the first attack.”
The article claims that Belgian police found and detonated these unexploded “kits” afterwards, writing:
Despite the spreading shock effect of the airport attack, it is also becoming clear that the terrorists only accomplished the first part of their jihadist mission. The Islamic State, which approved the operation, had envisaged a much bigger atrocity. This is attested to by the discovery of three bags containing identical kits of firearms and ammunition, a bomb belt, two AK-47 automatic rifles, magazines and hand grenades – all intact and unused. The police detonated them by controlled explosion.
CNN briefly mentioned that a third bomb was found in the airport and was indeed detonated in a “controlled explosion.” But so far no major media has mentioned the three identical bags packed with explosives and other weapons being found.
While seemingly casting doubt on the official narrative, the Israeli journal attributes this sly craftsmanship to the alleged ISIS network blamed for the attacks, arguing that the Belgian authorities were simply skewing the facts to cover up incompetence and security failures. Not explained by the authors ishow the ostensible ISIS terror cell could have penetrated security personnel at the airport to secretly hide three bags of weapons and explosives within the facility without anyone noticing.
Earlier in the article it was mentioned that weeks prior to the blasts in Brussels, an Israeli security firm was hired to provide a “security assessment” of the Zaventem airport, and reported major shortcomings.
The Belgian government some weeks ago hired an Israeli security firm to inspect security arrangements at the Zaventem airport of Brussels. The security experts, who were asked for advice on improvements, submitted initial recommendations for urgent upgrades. However those improvements had not been installed by Tuesday, March 22, when Islamist terrorists hit the airport’s departure hall with exploding suitcases, claiming more than 30 deaths and injuring scores of victims.
So if anyone knew the ins and outs of the security system at Zaventem airport, it was Israel. This is reminiscent to when an Israeli security team inspected the garage area of the World Trade Centre two years before the bombing in 1993, “warning” of the vulnerability of a truck bomb. Time Magazinereported:
ISRAELI SECURITY OFFICIALS CONCLUDED TWO YEARS AGO THAT the World Trade Center garage was vulnerable to a car bomb, according to Israeli sources. These security officials checked out the garage for Zim American Israeli Shipping Co., which is located in the Twin Towers and is a subsidiary of a partly state-owned Israeli company. Zim representatives publicly admit no knowledge of the security team’s inspection.
Al-Monitor reported on this patronizing Israeli attitude, which underscores Zionist revenge fantasies against Europeans:
Using Facebook as his platform, Katz’s Likud colleague Minister of Science Ofir Akunis released an especially reproachful and condescending post about the Europeans. “Let me repeat myself,” the minister wrote. “Many in Europe preferred to focus on the vile condemnation of Israel, on marking Israeli products and on boycotts. At the same time, thousands of terrorist cells affiliated with radical Islam sprung up, right under the noses of the people living on the Continent. Some mocked those who warned them about this. Others ridiculed them. Unfortunately, reality struck full force, cutting short the lives of dozens of innocent people.” According to Akunis, Europeans were so obsessed with the Israeli occupation that they failed to notice the monster that is Islamist terror growing right under their noses.
Whatever the truth is, Israel stood most to gain from the bloodshed in Brussels.
From: Sidney Blumenthal To: Hillary Clinton Date: 2012-07-23. Quoting an Israeli security source Sidney Blumenthal wrote:
[I]f the Assad regime topples, Iran would lose its only ally in the Middle East and would be isolated. At the same time, the fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies. (https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12171)
In 1982, Oded Yinon an Israeli journalist, formerly attached to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, published a document titled ‘A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties.’ The strategic plan later named ‘The Yinon Plan’ suggested that for Israel to maintain its regional superiority, it must break its neighboring Arab states into smaller sectarian units engaged in endless tribal wars. The Yinon Plan implied that Arabs and Muslims killing each other was an insurance policy for Israel.
Most commentators on the Middle East and American foreign affairs now realise that the chaos in the Middle East has a lot to do with Israel and its supportive Jewish lobbies around the world. However, thanks to the newly leaked Clinton email archive we may have a document that provides confirmation that the Yinon Plan was, de facto, an Israeli strategy to create sectarian chaos in the Middle East.
According to the Wikileaks archive of former US Secretary of State Clinton, it appears that in 2012 the Israeli intelligence service considered a potential Sunni-Shiite war in Syria a favorable development for the Jewish State and the West.
In an email sent by Sidney Blumenthal to Hilary Clinton, an Israeli source is quoted suggesting that Iran would lose “its only ally” in the Middle East if the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad collapses. Such a development in the view of Israeli commanders “would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies,” Blumenthal wrote.
It is crucial to point out that in his email to Clinton, Blumenthal also quotes an alternative view that is more reasonable and is far less enthusiastic about the escalation in Syria. “Israeli security officials believe that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is convinced that these developments (expanding Arab civil war) will leave them [Israelis] vulnerable, with only enemies on their borders.”
This email allows us to look at a vivid Israeli political debate that occurred back in 2012. The Jewish State had to decide whether to destroy the Syrian people just to weaken Iran or alternatively to destroy Iran dor the sake of destroying Iran. History suggests that a decision was taken to destroy the Syrians first. And the outcome must be disappointing for Israel —Iran is now stronger than ever.
Shockingly, in late 2015, after three years of disastrous Syrian civil war with hundreds of thousands of fatalities and millions of displaced people, Clinton, so it seems. still clung to the formula that Israel’s concerns with Iran should be fought on the expense of the Syrian people. In an email that US presidential candidate Hillary Clintonsent to an unknown account on 11/30/2015 Clinton wrote:
The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.
Israel is not the only one to blame for the Syrian shoah; Hilary Clinton shares some of the responsibility. I suggest that Ms. Clinton consider inviting at least a few Syrian refugees to settle in Clinton’s suburban home. Such a move would prove that she can be empathic, merciful and hopefully regretful.
Prior to September 11, 2001 the political fortunes of President George W. Bush were not near as bright as the 73% approval rating that he enjoyed in the following year. As the nation dipped deeper into economic recession increasing numbers of people were starting to place the blame at the feet of Mr. Bush’s 2001 economic program, which included large tax cuts for the wealthiest citizens. His vision of huge increases in defense spending, the resurrection of that right wing sacred cow, the “Star Wars” missile defense system, as well as radical “reform” inside the nations public schools, were going nowhere fast.
Even worse for the new administration, damaging information was starting to surface that caused even further doubt as to the validity of his very election. Media recounts of Florida’s election ballots, new books written by respected authors, and legal scholars, clearly revealed that George W. Bush did not win the state of Florida and should not have assumed the Presidency on January 20th, 2001!
Nineteen knife wielding terrorist provided Mr. Bush something that more than fifty million American voters refused to do in November of 2000, they provided him a mandate to govern.
TWO VIEWS OF THE ELECTION
When you talk to people it seems that their opinion of what really occurred in the 2000 presidential election falls along the lines of whom they voted for. Republicans will tell you that Bush clearly won, “every recount” proved this, and that the Democrats were simply “sore losers.” If you ask supporters of former Vice President, Al Gore, it’s an established fact that George W. Bush stole the election, or in the best case scenario is an “accidental” president.
WHICH IS IT?
The purpose of this article is to provide a convincing argument that backers of George W. Bush indeed stole the Presidency. We believe there is more than enough evidence that America inaugurated the wrong man on January 20th, 2001. Keep in mind; the theft of an election is a crime that borders on treason. This is why we dispute the claim of one prominent Republican political handler when he said gleefully, “We stole this election fair and square!”
There was a concerted effort among people in high places to make sure that George W. Bush would be our next President. When things didn’t work out as planned on Election Day it became a conspiracy after the fact. These people had no regard for the truth, the U.S. Constitution, or anything else. In effect, it was an illegal coup and it reached into the highest levels of the United States Government, including top brass inside the nations military.
Prior to election night experts following the race between Bush, and Gore, knew that to win the presidency the eventual winner would have to win the State of Florida. There was simply no other way for either man to obtain the 270 electoral votes needed without the 25 at stake in Florida. Early on Florida appeared to be easy pickings for the Republican Bush. His brother John Ellis “Jeb” Bush was the sitting Governor, of Florida, with a lofty approval rating. However, the Gore-Lieberman ticket had far greater appeal especially to Florida’s elderly and retired population, than political pundits realized. By the weekend before the election, Republican’s everywhere seemed in a panic because according to almost every poll Al Gore was ahead in Florida.
On the day of any election, major media outlets conduct something called “exit polls.” Based on these, they almost always know who is going to carry a state even before the polls close. Extensive interviews with Florida voters after they cast their ballots indicated that Vice President Gore would take the state, and it’s electoral votes by a margin of around 30,000.
All major news networks declared Florida for Gore within minutes of each other. The Bush campaign was devastated, everyone other than the candidate and his powerful brother, the sitting Governor, of Florida! Did they know something that we didn’t? Within an hour all of the networks took back the projection for Gore and moved Florida into the undecided column. Hours later FOX News, and John Ellis, the first cousin of G.W. Bush, who was employed by FOX News in its election coverage, declared that George W. Bush was the winner of Florida, and the presidency. Not wanting to be outdone the other networks quickly followed suit.
There was one major problem with the call for Bush. It was not based on solid data and it was premature. Soon the vote margin between the two candidates sunk to within a few hundred out of millions cast. Once again the call had to be taken back! The premature call for Bush should have aroused grave suspicion upon the motives of Mr. John Ellis. There is plenty of information out at this point to conclude that Ellis’ call was made with his heart and not the data at hand. Ellis’ bad call of the election had a far-reaching effect upon the eventual outcome. Most Americans went to bed thinking that George W. Bush had been elected President. In spite of the events to follow, Bush being declared “President Elect” gave him the appearance of inevitability, and made the election his to lose in the eyes of the public at large.
Was it only a coincidence that John Ellis, the first cousin of John Ellis “Jeb” Bush, and candidate, George W. Bush, had such a key role in declaring the outcome of the election? Was he just being the good relative by staying in constant telephone contact with the Bush brothers all through Election Day and night?
Was it pure coincidence that Mrs. Katherine Harris, the Secretary of State, in Florida, (the person in charge of the states elections) also happened to be the co-chair of G.W. Bush’s Florida election efforts?
IT’S NOT UNPATRIOTIC TO QUESTION BUSH’S ELECTION
Our patriotic sentiments after September 11th should not blind us to injustices done before that dreadful day. If George W. Bush was an illegitimate President before September 11th, he is still illegitimate. The right to vote and fair elections are the most sacred freedoms that we have in America. The travesty of the 2000 Presidential election has ramifications far greater than Bush, or Gore. It begs the question, are we really free?
THE UNDISPUTED FACTS
Vice President Gore won the nationwide popular vote by more than 540,000.
Right wing journalist Pat Buchanan received 3407 votes in Palm Beach County, five times more than he received in any other Florida county.
Pat Buchanan admitted on national television two days after the election, that at least 95% of his Palm Beach vote belonged to Al Gore.
Palm Beach officials began to receive complaints about the butterfly ballot by 8:30 AM election day.
Many Palm Beach voters asked for new ballots after realizing their mistake but were refused.
The design of the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach, county was illegal under Florida law.
Socialist Party candidate David McReynolds recieved 332 votes in Palm Beach County, and 602 State wide.
On Election Night in Volousia County, a computer glitch showed a Socialist Party candidate had more than 9,000 votes, while Vice President Al Gore had minus 16,000. Those numbers were sent out over the Internet, picked up by local newspapers and subsequently reported by themajor networks on Election Night. The socialist eventually ended up with 9 votes in the county.
680 overseas military ballots were allowed to be counted even though there was NO evidence that they were mailed prior to election day. This was a clear violation of Florida law.
The Bush campaign worked to disqualify military ballots in counties that might favor Gore.
Several thousand absentee ballots that could not be read by machine were “re-created” by Republican precinct workers, based on the “intent” of the voter.
Hundreds of absentee ballot applications in Seminole County, Florida, were corrected by Republican Party activists, in violation of Florida election law.
According to the New York Times, hundreds of ballots disappeared between election night and the media recounts. They have never been accounted for. (page 279 of “Too Close to Call” by Jeffery Toobin)
The “protesters” that stormed the Dade County elections offices causing the manual recount to be shut down, were in truth Republican activists from Washington. They were in Florida on an all expenses paid trip thanks to an organization controled by right wing Congressman, Tom Delay, of Texas.
In spite of Republican denials there were police road blocks set up near polling places in Democratic, Leon County, Florida, on election day.
“A thorough review of the ballots would, in my view threaten irreparable harm to petitioner George W. Bush, and to the country, by casting a cloud upon what he claims to be the legitimacy of this election.” (Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia)
“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.”—Benito Mussolini
THE BUSH MONARCHY
Members of the nations corporate elite, and political king makers, decided soon after the 1996 Presidential election that Texas Governor, George W. Bush, was going to be the next President of the United States. The Governor’s Mansion in Austin, Texas, became a revolving door for Republican politicians, captains of industry, and others, to pay homage to the next king. Millions of dollars were raised on his behalf even before Mr. Bush expressed his intention to seek the highest office in the land. For those wielding the power, G.W. Bush was a dream come true! In the words of Ralph Nader, Bush is ” a corporation dressed up as a man!”
Bush represented everything that right-wingers longed for since the end of the Reagan era. Someone with an agenda far to the right, but with the ability to appear moderate to America’s great political middle. Bush promised to fight for large tax cuts benefiting the wealthy, and the elimination of income taxes for large corporations. In addition, he would place numerous corporate puppets in key positions of power. In Texas “Dubya” had become the darling of the religious right because of his supposed “Pro life” stance on abortion. The suit fit Mr. Bush, and the ruling class of America was going to see to it that he got to wear it!
For decades the Bush family has rubbed elbows with America’s elite class. They have been at the heart of numerous profitable, but questionable business transactions since the start of WW II. There is clear evidence that at least some of the Bush fortune came from dealing with Hitler’s Germany in the late 1930’s and early 40’s.
Other than the Senate seat held by Prescot Bush until the late 1950’s, the Bush family had wielded it’s power from behind the scenes. That all changed with the emergence of George Herbert Walker Bush, who would become the 41st President of the United States. Since that time, the Bush family has viewed the U.S. Presidency as their own personal right of passage. When candidate George W. Bush, selected Richard Cheney, as his running mate, there were more sinister reasons for this choice, which didn’t make a lot of strategic sense at the time.
Selecting Cheney as his Vice President was done out of selfish family interests. Cheney’s health is fragile after several heart attacks. Even if he stays around for eight years it is very unlikely that he would seek the Presidency in his own right. It is a virtual given that John Ellis “Jeb” Bush is next in line to be the Republican nominee for President. Not even a defeat in his re-election bid during the 2002 Florida Governor’s race would have changed this.
The Bush family has powerful friends inside of every crucial area of American life. In spite of Republican claims of a dominant “Liberal” bias inside of America’s news media, it is clear that the Bush family enjoys a free ride when it comes to press coverage. Compare the lack of media investigation into the background of George W. Bush, to the witch-hunt that the press went on during both Bill Clinton’s candidacy, and time as President. The DUI arrest of Mr. Bush back in the 1970’s was only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to scandal involving the current President. Bill, and Hillary Clinton’s “Whitewater” land deal in which everyone agrees that they lost money on, is a tempest in a teapot compared to many of G.W. Bush’s business dealings. The collapse of the Enron Corporation has the fingerprints of Bush, and his adminstration’s officials, all over it. President Bush has a history of failed business dealings in which he walked away with huge windfalls. How many of you know about his involvement in probable insider stock trading of the defunct Harken Energy Corporation? Is the mainstream media drawing attention to the fact that Mr. Bush appears to have lied under oath while Governor of Texas, regarding his relationship with the SCI Corporation, a funeral home empire, and it’s CEO?
There is more than enough evidence for the news media to run with the claim that Mr. Bush was party to an ILLEGAL abortion in 1971. The name of the woman, the medical facility where it took place, and quotes from people who knew Mr. Bush, and his girlfriend can be found on a number of web sites. Does anyone believe that they would sit on this story if it involved former President Bill Clinton?
During the election of 2000, and the post November 7th controversy the dominant news media constantly beat the drum for G.W. Bush. The theme of almost every political pundit show was “When is Gore going to give up?” Right wing political pundits such as Tony Snow, Bill O’Reily, and Ann Coulter spent hours spinning the re-count story in Bush’s favor. Gore was being a “sore loser” and making a mockery of the political process. During the election 2000 dispute GOP think tanks faxed daily spin to their mouthpieces on talk radio. Rush Limbaugh said that “the question is not rather or not Al Gore was trying to steal the election, it is rather or not he will get away with it.” Limbaugh wannabe’s such as Michael Reagan, Ken Hamblin, and countless others kept the spin coming day after day. While these “journalist” and talk show hosts had every right to express their views, it’s clear that they served as key players in this illegal coup.
Still, the greatest asset that the Bush campaign had during the election controversy was the fact that G.W. Bush had been declared the “President Elect” by the major news networks before most American’s went to bed on election night. As mentioned earlier in this article this was orchestrated by Bush cousin, John Ellis Bush, and the right wing FOX News network, headed by former Republican strategist Roger Ailes.
MEANS MOTIVE AND OPPORTUNITY
For there to be a crime the key suspects always have the means, motive, and opportunity, to accomplish what they set out to do. Do we not have all of these things concerning the major Republican players in the 2000 election? There is no possible chance that any of these crimes will be honestly investigated. Vice President Al Gore put the matter behind him more than a year ago now. What can we do considering that the Bush Administration controls the Federal Justice Department, and Bush appointee John Ashcroft, further to the right than Bush, now calls the shots?
It’s important to note that the author of this page did NOT vote for Al Gore, and is in not affiliated with the Democratic Party. Still, the 2000 election was the theft of our democracy. When we sat back and allowed George W. Bush to steal the Presidency we turned our backs on the very principles that we were founded upon. Vice President Al Gore was the rightful winner of the 2000 election and it was a crime against the American people when he was not allowed to take office. The actions of G.W. Bush and his supporters were no different than an illegitimate coup in a banana republic! They forcefully took power that Mr. Bush did not win. I thought this type of thing could not happen in the United States of America? How wrong I was.
SOLUTIONS THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN
It is obvious that most American’s fail to realize, we do NOT live in a democratic nation. Right-wingers will boastfully remind us that America is a “Representative Republic.” Here in lies the problem with our political system. As a result of the wealthy few being able to buy access to America’s political leaders, the real people, the majority, average American’s are shut out of the process.
Before election reform or any other political solution is dealt with, the American people must take back their influence over those that are supposed to serve them. The first priority is real honest to goodness campaign finance reform. All private contributions to individual political candidates must be outlawed. We the people should insist upon PUBLIC financing of campaigns. The cost of such a system would be a drop in the bucket considering the benefit such a system would provide. With total public financing the elected officials would only be beholding to us. No longer would their decisions be influenced by wealthy corporate executives, special interest political PACS, or overseas billionaires. Every dime spent in election campaigns should be OUR money. Television and radio networks do not own the very airwaves that they broadcast over, (they are licensed by the federal government) US to use them. As a condition of their licenses they should be required by law to grant FREE airtime to ALL credible office seekers.
ELIMINATE THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
According to those advocating this constitutional dinosaur the electoral college was designed by the founding fathers to insure that smaller states like Vermont, and New Hampshire, have proportional say in Presidential elections. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Electoral College was a compromise between those who wanted the direct election of our President, and those who wanted elected representatives to make this decision. It had nothing to do with concern over the smaller less populated states.
Furthermore, would not the votes of the people in Vermont, and New Hampshire, count more without the Electoral College? Direct election of the President would require candidates to consider the needs of the smaller state voters. It would also encourage voter turn out. Consider the 2000 election. George W. Bush was a virtual shoe in in his home state of Texas. As a result there was no reason for supporters of Al Gore to go out and vote in the Presidential election. Since Mr. Bush was going to receive the states electoral votes (the only votes that matter) Gore voters had no reason to turn out. After all, their votes would not even count! The same can be said for states in which Gore was a shoe in. What incentive was there for Bush voters to turn out in New York, or California? Direct election would make everyone’s vote matter in the race for the highest office in the world.
We elect every other public official through a system of direct popular election. Why not do the same for the most important office all? Al Gore received 543,000+ more votes for President than did G.W. Bush. What kind of democracy is this?
SET UP A NATIONAL PRIMARY SYSTEM
Why do we as a free people allow two exclusive clubs to decide who our next President will be? What God given right allows the Democratic, and Republican Party’s, to make this decision on behalf of the rest of us? It was once said “The Soviet Union has but one party. In the United States we have two!”
There needs to be a national primary in the weeks before the general election. Have all candidates for President run in the primary. The top two vote getters would be the finalist in the general election. If one candidate garners more than fifty percent in the primary, they would become President of the United States. Most cities elect their city councils in this manner, why not the President?
Have you ever wondered why we hold elections on Tuesday? Is this not one of the worst days of the week if you want a high voter turn out? Election polls should open at 6 PM on Friday’s and close at 6 PM on Sunday’s. People should be allowed to vote at any number of locations. Polling places could be set up in malls, grocery stores, and even sporting events. We have the technology to insure integrity to the system if it became a national priority.
Recent events have proven that those in the Republican Party like the concept of low voter turnouts. Over the years Republican’s have fought any new laws designed to increase voter turn out. History has shown that Republicans do better in low vote turnouts. Democrats do better when the turn out is high.
You can rest assured that none of these common sense solutions will ever be implemented. Those who wield the real power (the corporate elite) do not want the people to have this much say in America’s political decisions. Instead they wish to sell us our President like they sell us their products!
By Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert
UNITED States of America – It can now be reported that the Joint U.S.-French Intelligence Task Force, operating on American soil for over 200 years, is in possession of the notes of the now dead former U.S. Supreme Court Justice neo-NAZI Antonin Scalia proving fraud upon the Supreme Court involving the coup d’ ‘etat aka the theft of the year 2000 presidential election from then Vice President, now year 2000 DULY ELECTED President Albert Gore Jr.
The Scalia notes include conversations with co-conspirators U.S. Senator Alan Simpson, Republican of Wyoming, and Bush Crime Family stooge James Baker, along with former BushFRAUD speech writer, NAZI Jew neocon Canadian born David Frum.
The notes include discussions of bribery with various Florida law firms including former PFG ceo German NAZI (now incarcerated) Russell Wasendorf.
P.S. Direct message to NAZI Jew Frum: Your appearance today on MSNBC is going to be dealt with immediately. So, let’s get it on, you little NAZI Jew Canadian bitch.
DULY ELECTED President Albert Gore Jr. on 25 occasions has challenged the HIGH TREASON TRAITOR against the American People and their Constitution, little NAZI faggot George W. Bush FRAUD to a duel to the death in Andrew Jackson style either a fist fit or a duel to the death involving the use of Tennessee squirrel guns.
AWOL coward Bush FRAUD has hung up the phone on 25 occasions and called the Secret Service to protect him from our DULY ELECTED President exercising justice.
P.S.S. U.S. Naval Intelligence (ONI), as well as the Michigan and Tennessee Flag Officers, have videos of George W. Bush FRAUD engaging in hot homosexual sex inside the White House with former Yale classmate Victor Ashe and body builder Jeff Gannon.
Note: Victor Ashe, who was then Congressman Al Gore’s opponent in the 1984 Tennessee Senatorial race, still engages in hot homosexual sex with BushFRAUD on a monthly basis.
We can also report that Naval Intelligence has photographs of NAZI Jew lesbian Hillary Rodenhurst Clinton engaging in hot lesbian sex in the White House during the 1990s with then White House prostitute Susan (call Lindlay at 301-565-0477).
In closing, ONI and the Joint U.S-French Intelligence Task Force also have proof that neocon NAZI Jew Hillary Rodenhurst Clinton conspired with NAZI Jew, former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg to cover up financial transactions tied to both the New York and Chicago financial exchanges involving put options aka short positions on major U.S. insurance companies and major financial firms 48 hours before the 9/11 Black Op aka NAZI German George W. BushFRAUD’s Hitler-style “Reichstag Fire”.
Finally, direct message to little homosexual bitch U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina: DULY ELECTED President Albert Gore Jr. is going to deal with you too and stick you in a homosexual outhouse.
DULY ELECTED President Albert Gore Jr.
the Supreme Law of the United States,
our U.S. Constitution, demands it!
Politico – by Josh Gerstein
The National Archives is fighting a lawsuit trying to force disclosure of several draft indictments of Hillary Clinton prepared by a Whitewater prosecutor in the 1990s.
In a brief filed late Tuesday, Justice Department lawyers and the Archives argue that disclosure of the draft indictments would lead to an unwarranted invasion of Clinton’s privacy and violate a court rule protecting grand jury secrecy.
“Despite the role that Mrs. Clinton occupied as the First Lady during President Clinton’s administration, Mrs. Clinton maintains a strong privacy interest in not having information about her from the files of the Independent Counsel disclosed,” wrote Martha Wagner Murphy, chief of the Archives “special access” branch that stores records of former independent counsels. “As an uncharged person, Hillary Rodham Clinton retains a significant interest in her personal privacy despite any status as a public figure.”
The conservative group Judicial Watch, which filed suit for the records in October under the Freedom of Information Act, is arguing that Clinton’s ongoing bid for the presidency reinforces the public interest in records about her alleged misconduct.
“She’s one of the most well-known women in the world, seeking the office of the presidency and her privacy interests outweigh the public interest in knowing what’s in that indictment? It’s absurd and it’s shameful that the administration is proposing this,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in an interview. “This is a political decision to protect her candidacy—because it is laughable, legally.”
The Archives and Justice Department were dismissive about the impact of Clinton’s presidential bid on public access to the records.
“While there may be a scintilla of public interest in these documents since Mrs. Clinton is presently a Democratic presidential candidate, that fact alone is not a cognizable public interest alone under FOIA, as disclosure of the draft indictments would not shed light on what the government is up to,” Murphy wrote.
“Her interest in avoiding disclosure of the drafts is not diminished by the fact that she is a former public official who is running for President,” Justice Department lawyers added in their brief.
Law enforcement records about living people who did not face charges in criminal investigations normally are not released under FOIA, or the names are sanitized from the records before they’re published. However, sometimes judges have ordered the release of such records in cases involving public officials.
Despite the usual practice, though, the Archives has released fairly detailed information about the independent counsel’s focus on Hillary Clinton. Just last week, Judicial Watch announced it had received 246 pages of records describing the crimes some prosecutors believed were committed in connection with the Whitewater land deal and related matters. Some of the memos are from the “HRC Team” in the counsel’s office—apparently a team focused on Clinton. One discusses the jury appeal or lack thereof of a case based solely on circumstantial evidence. One prosecutor put the chance of a conviction for Clinton at 10 percent.
It’s not clear from the government’s court filings why the draft indictments would be more sensitive than that kind of analysis, but the new submissions do argue that the drafts are covered by grand jury secrecy. In its initial response to Judicial Watch, the Archives relied solely on Clinton’s privacy (and that of others) and did not mention the grand jury secrecy issue. But the brief filed Tuesday contends the drafts would provide insight into the grand jury’s activities by revealing the identities of witnesses and that they quote from grand jury testimony.
Fitton said that “if Mrs. Clinton was being truly transparent,” she would provide a privacy waiver that could ease release of the records.
Spokesmen for the Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment on the legal filings.
Josh Gerstein is a senior reporter for POLITICO.
Donald Trump’s speech Monday night in Iowa after his surprising loss in the caucuses was perhaps most noteworthy for its graciousness.
“I want to congratulate Ted, and I want to congratulate all of the incredible candidates,” Trump told supporters in West Des Moines, saying he was “honored” to finish second.
Was this the beginning of a kinder, gentler Trump? Well…..
“Ted Cruz didn’t win Iowa, he stole it,” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning in the opening salvo of a series of tweets eviscerating Cruz.
The impetus for Trump’s fraud accusation appeared to be an erroneous claim disseminated from Cruz’s campaign Monday night during the caucuses that Ben Carson was poised to drop out of the race. Cruz later apologized for the incident, saying his team should have distributed a “follow-up statement from the Carson campaign clarifying that he was indeed staying in the race when that came out.”
Coin-Toss Fact Check: No, Coin Flips Did Not Win Iowa For Hillary Clinton
Reported by NPR–National Public Radio .org
Hillary Clinton got lucky Monday night. Very lucky.
But not for the reasons some are alleging.
Some have attributed her squeaker of a victory over Bernie Sanders in the Iowa Democratic presidential caucuses to an improbable lucky streak of tie breaking coin tosses.
It’s been reported that there were as many as six sites where ties were decided by the flip of a coin — and Clinton won every single one. The odds of that happening are 1 in 64, or less than 2 percent. What’s more, that gave her just slightly more than her margin of victory over Sanders — four delegates.
Things that make you go hmm. Indeed.
Here’s proof: Watch one of these coin-toss tiebreakers in this video, taken by Univision reporter Fernando Peinado at a caucus precinct:
Except that doesn’t tell the whole story. In fact, there were at least a dozen tiebreakers — and “Sen. Sanders won at least a handful,” an Iowa Democratic Party official told NPR.
Gone unmentioned so far is that even if Clinton won that Miracle Six — and there were no other coin tosses — it would make little difference in the outcome. That is, in part, because of the complicated way Iowa Democrats allocate their delegates — and what was being reported on election night and what wasn’t.
Let’s step back and explain that for a second; and this is tricky, so stay with us.
First, understand that the state party reported a grand total of 171,508 caucusgoers, the second-highest turnout in Iowa caucus history behind 2008. And no raw vote was — or is ever — broken out by candidate and recorded at the Democratic caucuses.
That’s because in Iowa, it’s a delegate game.
Iowa has a multistep process for picking delegates. Monday night was just Step 1. Here’s how it works:
1. There were 1,683 precinct caucuses on Iowa caucus night.
2. Those precinct caucuses elected 11,065 delegates to the county conventions, which take place March 12.
3. That universe of 11,065 delegates is whittled down to 1,406 who will attend congressional district (April 30) and state conventions (June 18).
4. And here’s the root of what’s causing all the confusion: The breakdown of those 11,065 is not reported on caucus night.
5. What IS reported, what Clinton’s 49.9 to 49.6 percent tracing-paper-thin lead is based on, is “state delegate equivalents.”
6. Those are ESTIMATES of how many of those 11,065 will attend the congressional district and state conventions.
So … when those coin tosses are happening, they are elected delegates in that larger universe.
That means, for Clinton to have picked up the four delegates, she would have had to have won not six in a row, but more like 47.
A coin flip? Really?
Yes, Iowa — and it’s not alone — uses coin tosses to break ties in precincts that award an odd number of delegates.
For example: Let’s say five delegates are set to be awarded in Precinct 1. There are 30 people for Clinton and 30 people for Sanders — and no one on either side can be swayed.
The result: Clinton and Sanders get two delegates apiece. What happens to the final delegate? The caucuses revert to, you guessed, it, a coin toss.
Does this happen often?
It’s pretty rare in a normal race, but this was no normal race. Clinton and Sanders were separated by a razor-thin 0.3 percentage point, or four “state delegate equivalents” — 701 for Clinton, 697 for Sanders and eight for Martin O’Malley. It was the closest result in 40 years of the Iowa Democratic caucus.
What was that about 60 missing caucusgoers and a coin flip?
As NPR’s Jessica Taylor reports, the Des Moines Register explained how a tie happened at one precinct: After 60 registered caucusgoers were missing since the initial tally, and O’Malley’s supporters had been redistributed, Clinton was assigned four delegates and Sanders got three. But one remained unassigned based on the initial count:
“Unable to account for that numerical discrepancy and the orphan delegate it produced, the Sanders campaign challenged the results and precinct leaders called a Democratic Party hot line set up to advise on such situations.
“Party officials recommended they settle the dispute with a coin toss. A Clinton supporter correctly called ‘heads’ on a quarter flipped in the air, and Clinton received a fifth delegate.”
Could this happen again this year?
It’s pretty unlikely, but not impossible. Again, as Taylor reports, seemingly unusual tiebreak methods are not new in politics. According to the National Council of State Legislatures, Wyoming uses coin tosses to break ties. Last year in Mississippi, the winner of a seat in the state Legislature was determined by drawing straws.
From the January 24, 2015 broadcast of the 2016 X Files premiere.
FAIR USE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Indictment Looms As FBI Declares 22 Clinton Home-Server Emails “Top Secret”
By Tom Heneghan
Submitted by Tyler Durden
Just as we warned, and she must have known, it appears at least 22 of the emails found on Hillary Clinton’s private email server have been declared “top secret” by The FBI (but will not be releasing the contents) according to AP.
Clinton has insisted she never sent or received information on her personal email account that was classified at the time. No emails released so far were stamped “CLASSIFIED” or “TOP SECRET,” but reviewers previously had designated more than 1,000 messages at lower classification levels for public release. Friday’s will be the first at the top secret level.
And because the administration believes strongly in transparency and accountability, you won’t get any information about just what kind of state secrets were passed on a non-secure server:
STATE DEPT WON’T SPEAK ON CONTENT OF TOP SECRET E-MAILS: KIRBY
KIRBY: SOME CLINTON-OBAMA E-MAIL EXCHANGES ARE BEING WITHHELD
As AP reports,
The Obama administration is confirming for the first time that Hillary Clinton’s unsecured home server contained some closely guarded secrets, including material requiring one of the highest levels of classification.
The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.
The State Department will release more emails from Clinton’s time as secretary of state later Friday.
But The Associated Press has learned that 7 email chains are being withheld in full for containing “top secret” material.
The 37 pages include messages recently described by a key intelligence official as concerning so-called “special access programs” — a highly restricted subset of classified material that could point to confidential sources or clandestine programs like drone strikes or government eavesdropping.
Department officials wouldn’t describe the substance of the emails, or say if Clinton had sent any herself.
Spokesman John Kirby tells the AP that no judgment on past classification was made. But the department is looking into that, too.
For those that Clinton only read, and didn’t write or forward, she still would have been required to report classification slippages that she recognized.
Possible responses for classification infractions include counseling, warnings or other action, State Department officials said, though they declined to say if these applied to Clinton or senior aides who’ve since left the department. The officials weren’t authorized to speak on the matter and spoke on condition of anonymity.
However, as we previously noted, the implications are tough for The DoJ – if they indict they crush their own candidate’s chances of the Presidency, if they do not – someone will leak the details and the FBI will revolt… The leaking of the Clinton emails has been compared to as the next “Watergate” by former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova this week, if current FBI investigations don’t proceed in an appropriate manner. The revelation comes after more emails from Hilary Clinton’s personal email have come to light.
“[The investigation has reached] a critical mass,” DiGenova told radio host Laura Ingraham when discussing the FBI’s still pending investigation. Though Clinton is still yet to be charged with any crime, DiGenova advised on Tuesday that changes may be on the horizon. The mishandling over the classified intelligence may lead to an imminent indictment, with DiGenova suggesting it may come to a head within 60 days.
“I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general,” he said.
“The intelligence community will not stand for that. They will fight for indictment and they are already in the process of gearing themselves to basically revolt if she refuses to bring charges.”
The FBI also is looking into Clinton’s email setup, but has said nothing about the nature of its probe. Independent experts say it is highly unlikely that Clinton will be charged with wrongdoing, based on the limited details that have surfaced up to now and the lack of indications that she intended to break any laws.
“What I would hope comes out of all of this is a bit of humility” and an acknowledgement from Clinton that “I made some serious mistakes,” said Bradley Moss, a Washington lawyer who regularly handles security clearance matters.
Legal questions aside, it’s the potential political costs that are probably of more immediate concern for Clinton. She has struggled in surveys measuring her perceived trustworthiness and an active federal investigation, especially one buoyed by evidence that top secret material coursed through her account, could negate one of her main selling points for becoming commander in chief: Her national security resume.
—– Forwarded message from “Mary”
Aidar Battalion is a Territorial Defense Battalion of Ukraine, a volunteer military detachment of Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense. The battalion is currently fighting in the war in Eastern Ukraine, and has roughly 400 members. The unit is known for links to the far-right and soldiers associated with the unit have been documented brandishing Neo-Nazi symbols.
Crimes of Ukrainian Aidar battalion confirmed in Amnesty Int’l report …
Ukrainian Nationalist Volunteers Committing ‘ISIS-Style’ War Crimes
Sep 10, 2014 … Armed volunteers who refer to themselves as the Aidar battalion … of the Azov battalion flying flags with the symbols of Ukraine’s neo-Nazi party …
US Army to Train Ukrainian Fascist Militias | Global Research …
Apr 1, 2015 … “The Azov battalion originated from Biletsky’s paramilitary national socialist … openly praises Nazi ideology, while quoting a spokesman for the battalion … members of the Aidar battalion engaging in “ISIS-style” war crimes, …
“Beyond Top Secret” Hillary Clinton Emails Used In Russian Court Against Ukraine Pilot
By Tom Heneghan
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A very intriguing Federal Security Services (FSB) report prepared for The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (SLEDKOM) relating to the trial of Ukrainian “spy/terrorist” Nadiya (Nadezhda) Savchenko states that “beyond top secret” emails obtained from a “private computer storage device” belonging to former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “should/must” be allowed into the sentencing phase of this case due not only to their “critical relevance”, but, also, because the “apprehension” of them falls outside the purview of the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).
According to this report, Nadiya Savchenko is a former Ukraine Air Force pilot who in 2014 joined the neo-Nazi Aidar Battalion, which is a volunteer military detachment of Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense currently fighting against Russian separatist factions in their eastern regions and has been the target of many war crimes investigations.
On 6 June 2014, this report continues, Nadiya Savchenko entered into the Federation from Ukraine and presented herself before Federal Migration Service (FMS) officials stating that she was a refugee and requesting she be granted Russian identity documents—which were approved.
On 17 June 2014, this report notes, while on Federation soil and in the possession of (legal) Russian identity documents, Nadiya Savchenko used her cellular phone to secretly adjust mortar fire from her Aidar Battalion terrorist allies in Ukraine onto a militia roadblock in the vicinity of Metallist village in the self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) killing Russian television reporter Vladimirovich Kornelyuk and his sound engineer Anton Voloshin.
Neo-Nazi Terrorist Nadiya Savchenko On Trial
With the facts relating to Nadiya Savchenko’s terrorist crimes and neo-Nazi affiliations having been fully documented during her trial, FSB legal analysts in this report state, the “beyond top secret” emails belonging to former Secretary Hillary Clinton are critical for the court’s “understanding/consideration” in sentencing as they “directly relate” to the causes as to why this murderer has become the West’s latestcause célèbre against Russia.
According to these FSB analysts, the specific emails obtained from former Secretary Hillary Clinton involving Nadiya Savchenko were written by US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland who masterminded what the private American intelligence firm Stratfor (known as the Shadow CIA) called the “most blatant coup in history” in toppling Ukraine’s legitimate government.
And with these emails having a US government classification of SAP (an acronym for ‘special access programs,’ a level of classification above top secret), this report further notes, the “black project” nature of the American’s attempting to subvert justice in the case of Nadiya Savchenko has not only been confirmed, but also explained.
For what these emails show, this report explains, was that upon the FSB’s arrest and detention of Nadiya Savchenko for her crimes in 2014, Assistant Secretary Nuland began a “counter campaign” of Western propaganda depicting this neo-Nazi terrorist as a heroic female pilot unjustly being persecuted by Russia—and while at the same time not a single report of Foreign Minister Lavrov’s extensive report to the international media has yet appeared on any major online American, French, British and German newspaper portals or television channels, the coverage of this Nazi terrorist has been non-stop.
Most intriguing, however, about this FSB report is its advising the Investigative Committee that it is legal to use these Secretary Hillary Clinton’s emails against Nadiya Savchenko as the method(s) in which they were obtained were outside of the jurisdiction of the SVR.
This is an important distinction to note due to if these were emails obtained from a foreign government (in this case the US), the SVR would have “sole and exclusive” domain over them and would never allow their admittance in court due to the high security level they would be held under.
Having been obtained from Secretary Hillary Clinton’s “private computer email server” though, FSB legal analysts state in this report, these emails are to be considered as outside of US government jurisdiction and thus legal, under Russian law, to be used in any matter before the court.
As to how exactly the FSB obtained these “beyond top secret” Secretary Hillary Clinton emails this report doesn’t say, but it is important to note that the former US Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, did recently acknowledge that they were in the possession of Russia and, just yesterday, the US State Department was forced to admit that 22 “top secret” emails were found on her private email server she had previously told the American weren’t there because she deleted them.
Aidar Battalion is a Territorial Defense Battalion of Ukraine, a volunteer military detachment ofUkraine’s Ministry of Defense. The battalion is currently fighting in the war in Eastern Ukraine, and has roughly 400 members. The unit is known for links to the far-right and soldiers associated with the unit have been documented brandishing Neo-Nazi symbols.
Crimes of Ukrainian Aidar battalion confirmed in Amnesty Int’l report …
Ukrainian Nationalist Volunteers Committing ‘ISIS-Style’ War Crimes
Sep 10, 2014 … Armed volunteers who refer to themselves as the Aidar battalion … of the Azov battalion flying flags with the symbols of Ukraine’s neo-Nazi party …
Oregon Militia Asked to Sign Talent Release – Running to Shut Off Feed! – PRICELESS
Published on Jan 27, 2016
Full credit for this BUST of “militia” in Oregon getting asked to sign Talent Release. One of them runs to shut off the live feed but too late, they are busted! Full credit for this bust goes to patriot James Farganne
So how much of the action in Oregon is staged by Feds?
This lifestream came from Youtube Channel
DefendYourBase so all these guys need to be investigated.
James Farganne reported he witnessed these “militia” guys on this channel being very nasty and bashing Christian patriots. They also talked about shooting Feds which is usually a telltale sign of a Fed run operation! Spread this video EVERYWHERE!
The below picture of the attempted murder of Stew Webb October 25, 2010 by two of Hillary Clinton's Assassins. There were two more crashed and attempts one year later.
Contributions are much appreciated Thank You.-- Stew Webb
U.S. President Donald Trump
Donald J. Trump's Website
Donald Trump Full Speeches
Donald Trump Presidential Announcement Full Speech 6/16/15
TEXT TRUMP TO 88022 TO GET EXCLUSIVE UPDATES
***By participating, you consent to receiving automated text messages from the campaign. Standard messaging rates apply.***
To donate, go here: https://secure.donaldjtrump.com/donate/
Contributions are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.
P.S. If you would like to purchase official campaign gear, click here.
Spot Dog is on the loose he loves to eat Illuminati, Zionist, Satanists and Lying Media Political Whores.
Stew Webb Whistle blower Grand Jury Demand Still Active against Hillary Clinton aka "HildaBeast". Where is the Justice Department having Lesbo Demonic Sex with Hillary Clinton?
Hillary Clinton aka "HildaBeast"
Hillary Clinton above Barking Like A Female Dog now Spot Dog wants to have hot sex with Hildabeast and HikdaDikes Lesbo Lover Huma Abedine we told the Spot dog his private part will fall off because HildaBeast is a Walking STD
Hillary Clinton Child Rapist
Hillary's America The Movie
Buggles - Video killed the radio star
Fair Use Notice
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.