Motion for Criminal Referral to the U.S. Attorney Kansas
City, Kansas 10th District January 7, 2010 ref Civil Case No:
09-2603-cv-02603-FJG
Motion for Criminal Referral to the U.S. Attorney Kansas
City, Missouri 8th District January 7, 2010 ref Civil Case No:
09-2603-cv-02603-FJG
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
STEWART A. WEBB
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Case No:
09-2603-cv-02603-FJG
HON. JUDGE KATHRYN H. VRATIL, in her
Official capacity as Chief Judge
for the United
States District Court
the District of
Kansas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Defendant,
Official Notice
18 U.S.C. 4 Federal Reporting Crimes Act
Motion for
Criminal Referral to the United States Attorneys
Comes now the plaintiff Stewart A. Webb appearing pro
se and makes the following Motion for Criminal Referral based on
undisputable facts and controlling law.
Plaintiff Stewart Webb wishes to notice the Court, Court
Clerks and the United States Attorneys for Kansas City, Kansas Lanny D. Welch United States Attorney for The District of
Kansas. 500 State Ave. Suite 360. Kansas City, KS 66101 and Kansas City, Missouri
Beth Phillips U.S. Attorney For The Western District of Missouri Office Room
5510 400 East 9th Street Kansas City, Missouri 64106 and the Kansas City FBI
Office kansas.city@ic.fbi.gov that it would be
a MISPRISION OF FELONY under 18 USC 4 to fail to disclose felonious acts that
have been witnessed by or that have come to the attention of the Plaintiff.
Plaintiff and others are also aware that Numerous
Felonies have been committed by some of the named and unnamed defendants and
Co-Conspirators.
The plaintiff submits the following with evidence useful
for determining that this action is not frivolous and that admissible evidence
is available to assert the Plaintiff Stewart A. Webb Motion for Criminal Referral
to The U.S. Attorneys in both Kansas City, Kansas and Kansas City, Missouri,
and the Kansas City Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
There would be no fee required for a Criminal Referral to
the U.S. Attorney’s Office and this Criminal Referral is not frivolous because
there is evidence of Felonies Committed as the proof of these Felonies are in
the Plaintiff’s Corrected Memorandum for Summary Judgment and Motion for
Summary Judgment with attachments.
http://www.stewwebb.com/webb_petition_112409.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/AFFIDAVIT_IN_SUPPORT_OF_STEWART_WEBB_11242009.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/chamber_copy_for_judge_marten.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/chambers_copy_for_magistrate_waxse.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/service_of_motion_for_summary_judgment_on_lanny_welch_11292009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/service_of_motion_for_summary_judgment_on_eric_holder_11292009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/Plaintiffs_Corrected_Memorandum_in_Support_of_Summary_Judgment_11302009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/plaintiffs_motion_for_summary_judgment_11302009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/Stew_Webb_Motion_for_Reconsideration_12142009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/stew_webb_vs_judge_kathryn_vratil_notice_of_appeal_12232009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/the_case_is_not_under-seal_12122009.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/civil_docket_stew_webb_vs_case_sealed_12082009_case_209_cv_02603_fjg.pdf
See Exhibits: on google
below
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/3-plaintiff-s-motion-for-summary-judgment
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/motion-for-summary-judgment-upload
STATEMENT OF
FACTS
The continuing violations and the over arching goal of
the RICO conspiracy have been researched and recorded as they occurred up to
and including November 25, 2009 the date the plaintiff filed in this court for
relief in equity to obtain legal counsel in the course of the plaintiffs
business in preparation to present evidence and testimony of numerous witnesses
to a US District Court for the District of Colorado Grand Jury in
Webb v. Millman, et al. Cr. Div. Case No. 95Y107. Assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Richard P. Matsch.
The Hon. Judge Fernando J. Gaitan
Jr.‟s determination of mootness
of the plaintiff‟s Motion for Summary Judgment
and memorandum of controlling law supported by over 80 factual exhibits which
cannot be frivolous and entitles the plaintiff to the relief he seeks and was
unopposed by the defendants.
The memorandum in support of the plaintiff‟s
motion for summary judgment specifically
gave Hon. Judge Fernando J. Gaitan Jr. evidence of
federal felony crimes being committed by State of Kansas officials to violate
Civil Rights and injury to similarly situated individuals who were retaliated
against through extrinsic fraud over federal court proceedings to meet the
burden of proving the 1st and 2nd criteria for injunctive relief under Kansas
Hospital Association v. Whiteman, 835 F. Supp. 1548,
1551-2 (D.Kan. 1993).
The plaintiff will show infra under the competency
of the evidence used to disbar Bret D. Landrith that
the State of Kansas disbarment was procured through extrinsic fraud.
The plaintiff will show infra under the competency
of the evidence used to disbar Bret D. Landrith that
the present defendants the defendants the Hon. Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil,
and the Kansas District Court participated and in some instances caused the
procurement of the state disbarment through extrinsic fraud on the Kansas
Supreme Court.
The plaintiff will show infra under the competency
of the evidence used to disbar Bret D. Landrith that
the present defendants the defendants the Hon. Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil, and the Kansas District Court through extrinsic
fraud caused an ethics panel of the Kansas District Court including the Hon.
Judge J. Thomas Marten to reciprocally disbar Bret D. Landrith
in the absence of a hearing and contrary to controlling law.
The public interest in other jurisdictions including the
State of Kansas, the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri,
the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, The US Court of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
and the US Supreme Court have been injured by the defendants the Hon. Chief
Judge Kathryn H. Vratil, and the Kansas District
Court (“KDC”).
All resulting inconveniences that may be suffered by the
Hon. Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil, and the Kansas District Court as a result of granting the
proposed injunctive relief arise solely from the upholding of federal law and
the US Constitution against trespass on the rights of the plaintiff and the
plaintiff’s right to access to the courts.
The plaintiff will show infra that upholding the
public interest in undoing extrinsic fraud injuring the enforcement of federal
laws can result in no legally recognizable counter interest or estate of Hon.
Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil, and the Kansas
District Court in the benefits of obtained from the fraud.
The plaintiff will provide legal authority in his
memorandum of law that the legislated public policy interest was injured by the
disbarment of Bret D. Landrith.
The plaintiff will provide legal authority in his
memorandum of law that the unlawful disbarment of Bret D. Landrith
has resulted in a State of Kansas policy that is being used to unlawfully
injure more Kansas attorneys in a way that creates a grave danger that the
plaintiff and the Citizens of the States including Kansas will be injured in
their federally protected rights by racketeering schemes violating 18 U. S. C.
§ 1961, et seq. and the Bush Millman Linder Crime
Syndicate specifically.
The plaintiff will provide legal authority in his
memorandum of law that the violation of a criminal statute is at law a
violation of the legislated public policy interest.
The presentation of evidence of criminal wrongdoing to
the US Government via a grand jury or as a False Claims Act relator
furthers the public interest. (See below request to transfer Grand Jury to
Kansas City, Kansas)
The presentation of evidence of criminal wrongdoing
meeting the elements of enumerated racketeering violations under 18 U. S. C. §
1961 Congress has created a private right of action to redress as claims under
18 U. S. C. § 1961 furthers the public interest.
The public interest has been injured in Bolden v. City of
Topeka, KDC Case No. 02-2635-KHV when the Hon. Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil was the trier of fact but
did not reveal to Bolden or his replacement counsel that she had procured the
disbarment of his replacement counsel through extrinsic fraud.
See exhibit. 2 Procedural History of Lipari v
US Bank.
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The gravamen of the defendant Hon. Chief Judge Kathryn H.
Vratil against Bolden is the fact he had such great
difficulty obtaining representation until Landrith
took his appeal. See Bolden KDC case management hearing before Magistrate James
O’Hara:
http://www.medicalsupplychain.com/pdf/Bolden%20Hearing.wav
The public interest in having impartial federal and state
courts resolve issues regarding the law has been injured by the defendants’ failure to uphold federal
statutes on behalf of pro se parties and is now causing the exercise of
popular sovereignty in the form of a petition to the State of Kansas
Legislature that could have the effect of requiring the removal from office of
Kansas State Representatives and Senators that fail to act to free David Martin
Price under Kansas State Statutes applying to public officials.
See exhibit 3
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The Chief Justice of the Missouri Supreme Court addressed
hundreds of attorneys, judges and court employees and demanded an end to
predetermined court cases after Bret Landrith’s
former client and successor in interest Samuel K. Lipari’s
repeated appeal efforts in Jackson County 16th Circuit Court of Missouri and
the fate of Lipari’s claims serving the interest of
Missouri State Law removed to the US District Court for the District of Kansas.
See exhibit 4 Speech of Missouri Chief Justice.
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The US Senator of Missouri Claire McCaskill
responded to a constituent request by Landrith
seeking to obtain information about being able to practice in federal courts
after unlawfully being disbarred for successfully representing an African
American in a Civil Rights Case.
See exhibit 5 Letter of Landrith
to McCaskill.
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The US Senator of Missouri Claire McCaskill
instructed Landrith to file ethics complaints against
the judges ordering the disbarment.
See exhibit 6 Letter of Senator Claire McCaskill to Landrith.
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The US Senator of Missouri Claire McCaskill
was subsequently chosen to chair a Senate Committee to prosecute the removal
from office of the Impeached Judge Samuel B. Kent.
See exhibit 7 St. Louis Times Article on Senator
Claire McCaskill’s appointment to impeachment
committee.
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The aid to public
interest that would result in granting the injunction
The plaintiff can write charging documents to the very
low standard a government prosecuting attorney such as a US Attorney is held to
in a criminal information.
The plaintiff cannot write a Civil RICO complaint,
anticipating the sham Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to the
standard even a pro se litigant will be held to in a federal court.
This court ruled that Landrith’s amended petition against a Bush Millman Lindner RICO Enterprise pattern Ponzi
was sufficient to be served on the defendants.
See exhibit 8 Cremeen
v,, Bank of America et al. KDC No.
04-02519-GTC-DJW
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
Key evidence of Numerous Felonies Committed by Kansas State Officials and
Gale Larkin
Key evidence of Numerous Felonies lie in the Illegal
Disbarment of Attorney Bret Landrith using Gale Larkin, The Kansas Displinary Office. Gale Larkin got Three Attorney’s to lie to Disbar Bret Landrith
and Keep Donna Huffman from Obtaining her Law License
as evidence in Plaintiff Stewart A. Webb’s Corrected Memoradum
in Support of Summary Judgment and Plaintiff Motion for Summary Judgment.
Exhibit
Plaintiff Memorandum for Summary Judgment:
120. On November 13, 2009 The Kansas Supreme Court ruled
that Donna Huffman had
the character and fitness to take the bar exam reversing the
majority determination of the
Kansas Attorney Discipline Office and the Arguments of
Kansas Attorney Discipline
Prosecutor Gail Larkin that had kept Donna Huffman from
taking over six attorney Bar
Entrance Exams.
See exhibit: Motion for Summary Judgment and Corrected
Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment.
http://www.stewwebb.com/Plaintiffs_Corrected_Memorandum_in_Support_of_Summary_Judgment_11302009.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/plaintiffs_motion_for_summary_judgment_11302009.pdf
See Exhibits: on google
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
The Below Links are
additional Evidence for Criminal Referral 18 U.S.C. 4 Federal Reporting Crime
Act
http://www.medicalsupplychain.com/pdf/Lipari
Petition 08-09.pdf
http://www.stewwebb.com/samuel_lipari_vs_GE_Jeb_bush_Novation_US_Bank_etal_12142009.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/stew_webb_vs_bush_millman_lindner_clinton_crime_syndicate_122009.htm
http://www.medicalsupplychain.com/news.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/obama_bush_heath_care_frauds_continue_2_dead_us_attorneys_12272009.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/the_chicago_board_of_trades_role_in_corrupting_courts_12202009.htm
The most recent outline and summary of the 18 U. S. C. §
1961enumerated predicate criminal acts committed by identified members of the
Bush Millman Lindner RICO Enterprise and its RICO
Co-Conspirators is viewable as a criminal information or charging document to
be submitted to the District of Colorado Grand Jury at
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
September 14, 2009 Case No: 95-Y-107 Grand Jury Demand
Assigned to Honorable Judge Richard P. Matsch
http://www.stewwebb.com/stew_webb_grand_jury_demand_vs_bush_millman_clinton_etal_09142009.htm
The reason the Plaintiff
Stewart Webb asked for a transfer of his Federal Grand Jury Demand to Kansas
City, Kansas are twofold.
1.
For Witness Convenience and the constant Obstruction of Justice in the Clerk
and US Attorney’s offices in Denver Colorado to keep from having this open
Grand Jury Case from being heard, which the Plaintiff Stewart Webb has proof to
these allegations including Bribes paid to Judges and Prosecutors in that
District by the Bush-Millman RICO Enterprise.
See Exhibit:
http://www.stewwebb.com/M&L%20Business%20Machines%20USAttorney%20Mike%20Norton%20Partial%20Bribe.htm
2.
That the Plaintiff has learned that United States District Court Judge
Richard P. Matsch is probable intimidated, scared for his life to uphold the
Law since Judge Matsch’s Daughter was Murdered by the same named in Plaintiff’s
Grand Jury Filing and Demand to present evidence and witnesses of Treason ,
Sedition, Narcotics Importation into the United States, False Claims against
The United States Treasury, Murders committed by said Defendants, Narcotics
Money Laundering, Weapons Sales in Violation of The Barkley Cole Indenture Act,
including False Claims against the United States Treasury in the recent Bank
Bail Out Scam, Frauds Upon The Courts and Interfering in Federal Investigations
to Obstruct Justice among many other Federal Law Violations as stated in Plaintiff
Stewart A. Webb’s Grand Jury Demand.
See link below:
http://www.stewwebb.com/From%20Cradle%20to%20Cabal%20The%20Secret%20Life%20of%20Gale%20Norton.html
http://www.stewwebb.com/stew_webb_grand_jury_demand_vs_bush_millman_clinton_etal_09142009.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/kerre_millman_attempted_murder_fugitive_022109.htm
Congressional Investigators Letter to Stew Webb Federal
Whistleblower
http://www.stewwebb.com/House%20of%20Rep%20HUD%20Stew%20Webb.jpg
Stew Webb Savings and Loan Whistleblower Faces False
Charges and Dismissed with Prejudice
http://www.stewwebb.com/Inside%20The%20Bush%20Crime%20Family%20Part2.htm
Mr. Timothy M. O’Brien
Clerk Of Court
Robert J. Dole Courthouse
500 State Ave.
259 U.S. Courthouse
Kansas City, Kansas 66101
ksd_clerks_kansascity@ksd.uscourts.gov
September 14, 2009
RE: US Grand Jury Proceeding Webb v. Millman, et al. Cr. Div. Case No. 95Y107
Dear Mr. O’Brien,
I am writing to inform you that I am seeking to change a
Grand Jury situs from the US District Court for the
District of Colorado to the Kansas District Court building at 500 State Avenue.
This request is being made of Senior Colorado District Judge, Hon. Richard P. Matsch
I understand the Robert J. Dole Courthouse has a US Court
of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit courtroom, which would facilitate the presentation
of witnesses and evidence in the above captioned matter.
I am planning to finish preparing the initial evidence by
September 22nd and I anticipate that a little over three weeks will
be required. I understand that some days might be blocked out as your courtroom
is used for Tenth Circuit and Kansas State Appeals functions and I believe we
will be able to accommodate the interruptions.
Please let me know of any changes in the courtrooms
schedule or demands of your staff handling jury matters and I will attempt to
adjust my plans accordingly. I will keep you informed so that you might know at
the earliest moment when to empanel prospective grand jurors.
Respectfully submitted,
S/Stewart Anthony Webb
Stewart Anthony Webb
Pro se Federal Whistleblower
Prosecuting Witness
Respectfully submitted,
S/Stewart Anthony Webb
Respectfully submitted to The United States Attorneys for
Criminal Referral,
S/Stewart Anthony Webb
25 Years a Federal Whistleblower
Mail: P.O. Box 3061
Independence, MO. 64055
913-952-0846
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certified I have served the above motion on opposing
parties by filing the Motion for Criminal Referral January 7th, 2010 on the
courts electronic filing system and by email filings to
ksd_clerks_kansascity@ksd.uscourts.gov
I further certified I have served the Motion for Criminal
Referral by US Mail
containing a link to an
html or pdf
version of the same available online at
http://sites.google.com/site/stewwebbvjudgevratil/
stew_webb_vs_bush_millman_lindner_clinton_crime_syndicate_122009.htm
to the following by
depositing it in the US Mail with First Class postage affixed:
Beth Phillips
U.S. Attorney's Office
Room 5510
400 East 9th Street
Kansas City, MO 64106
U.S. President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20530
Eric Holder
Attorney General,
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Lanny D. Welch
United States Attorney
For The District of Kansas.
Kansas City 500 State Ave. Suite 360.
Kansas City, KS 66101
Phone (913) 551-6730
Thomas E. Perez
Assistant Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main
Washington, D.C. 20530
Phone (202) 514-4609
Fax (202) 514-0293
(202) 307-2572
(202) 307-2839
James C. Duff
Director of the Administrative Office
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
One Columbus Circle NE
Washington, D.C. 20544
Phone (202) 502-2600
S/ Stewart A. Webb
Stewart A. Webb
Pro se Federal Whistleblower
913-952-0846
