A retired Army general, Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, is demanding Congress and all branches of our government to do their “Constitutional duties” demanding the “forced resignations” of Obama and other administration officials.
Washington DC, Operation American Spring, May 16, 2014.
For more information contact:
Dr. Jim Garrow , Col Harry M. Riley, Maj Gen Paul Vallely
He said there needs to be a grass-roots campaign that includes protests and social media.
FOX News the AIPAC Zionist Espionage News Network
Vallely, who has also served as a Fox News military analyst
US Military Intel Source to Stew Webb:
Vallely is a corrupt ass kissing shithead, know him well, article is entirely crap.
Further note that all those being fired from the U.S. Military Generals and Col.
Are corrupt and answer to AIPAC and the Bush Organized Crime Syndicate who have destroyed America.
Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
The match is HOT and NOW is the time to strike!
Stew Webb Founder
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
Stew Webb Youtube
Bruce Campbell Solutions for America Get involved
Americans are finally starting to wake up to the stark reality. The Israeli regime must be erased from the sands of time.
If the US really wants peace and security it is time to throw away what is left of the NecCon’s mini-World War they had engaged in after 911 and concentrate on one threat…Israel.
But this will not be easy. Like cancer can start in one place and then spread itself throughout the body to overwhelm its defenses, Israeli espionage has used a similar tact.
Poisonous spider bites work similarly. I know, as two years ago I got a brown recluse spider bite, and a year later another by a black widow.
The brown recluse bite, at the beginning of the third day when I finally realized it was worse than a red ant bite I thought it was, my heavily swollen right hand was beginning to go into paralysis.
When I picked up my car keys they slipped out of my hand onto the floor. And when I picked them up they slipped out again. The light came on that I was in a serious situation with a major poison spider bite.
Fortunately my Afghanistani doctor down the street was very experienced in these bites. They told me that if I had waited one more day I would have been hospitalized and kissing away a lot of money.
A brown recluse bite – left untreated for too long – Drs. are shocked that people do not come in until gangrene sets in.
He explained that after the poison formed a red spot and a pimple at the bite, it spreads throughout the whole body so your white blood cells were running all over trying to fight it.
The bite area was then left undefended and the flesh there would just begin to die and rot with gangrene.
Americans live under an analogous attack with Israeli espionage and terrorism here. Sure, they have certain key targets that they strike, like with military and nuclear espionage.
But their political espionage spreads far and wide so they are everywhere. I can give you one shocking example of how bad it has been.
The peak of Israeli espionage was in the 1980′s when they began their big push to build their own military industrial complex to be able to export high value items, and actually compete with America. Israel has no real port and is unsuited for any kind of regular major industry. So one of it’s major exports is death and mayhem.
At the peak of their offensive in the ’80′s, 50% of the FBI’s counter intelligence resources are occupied in ‘blocking’ Israeli military espionage as they were stealing everything here they could get their hands on. This even projects in early development which they then tried to bring to market sooner, or with a better version. Think miniaturization of nuclear weapons to get my drift here.
Mind you, this was still right in the middle of the Cold War days where the FBI had their hands full with traditional counter espionage concerns.
Part of the disaster here, like the brown recluse spider bite, was while the FBI’s resources were overstretched Jonathan Pollard was able to destroy a whole generation of American Intelligence effort and expenditures.
Pollard – Then and now
Pollard was tasked by the Israelis with getting first strike capability for the Russians by compromising our nuclear force, along with as much damage to our overseas spy networks.
He turned in a stellar performance. He was able to penetrate the navy’s nuclear submarine codes, and defeat the ground based missiles.
That left only the B-52′s as a deterrent, something much easier for the Soviets to contend with it they could concentrate all of their resources against them.
Pollard also killed off our Eastern European spy networks. Over a 1000 CIA agents and assets were arrested and many executed. Why did Israel do this? They were playing a double game on us with the Russians.
They want a million Soviet pretend-a-Jews allowed to immigrate to Israel so the Zios could kick a corresponding number of Palestinian low level workers out of those job slots, and also help stem the changing birth demographics.
Now you know why the Pollard file is still classified and why the Intel community has fought his release so hard whenever it came up.
But you also saw how deep the political espionage has run when you look as the Who’s Who of the American political establishment who have signed on to the Free Pollard movement, including Hillary Clinton and even ex-CIA director James Woolsey, who knows what the Israelis really did to us.
Treason in support of Israel, to date. does not hurt your political career at all.
The Zios gave the Soviets the best first strike opportunity they had ever had. And such Intel is never sought to put up on the shelf to use for a rainy day.
They knew that codes would eventually be changed and new security measures put in place. They had to use it, or loose it…so we must assume they were planning a first strike, and Israel was cut in on the deal.
To defeat Israeli espionage in America, all of their dual citizen and political assets have to be rooted out and destroyed.
The problem there is they are so substantial that the country would be shocked beyond belief at the depth of the betrayal. For quite a while now the main justification (other than shame) for keeping the lid on all this is that the shock to public trust in government would be so deep as to actually be deemed a major national security threat. Imagine that!
That is the wall of silence this has all been hidden behind, and why our government as never warned the American people about the constant attack we have always been under by the Israeli’s and their traitor helpers here. This lack of warning, and concern by even the mainline veterans orgs, has kept Americans dumb and happy (or unhappy) about this national security disaster.
But fortunately the tide is turning. When AIPAC deployed its 250 man A-team in its much publicized raid on Congress to make them tow the line on supporting Obama’s Syria strike, they found that Americans had gotten there ahead of them with their huge outpouring of contempt at what they felt was another staged intervention event. AIPAC got crushed, but their media buddies kept the extent of the rebuff off the front page news.
AIPAC’s Michael Kassan with Netanyahu
Reeling from that defeat, and in a panic to put something on the table to show that AIPAC was still feared on Mid East issues, we saw their expected pivot away from Syria and shift to bring Iran back onto the bogeyman threat table.
But there was only one problem. The ‘bomb, bomb Iran’ hoax had already been beaten to death with a long history of crying wolf about their ‘having a bomb in six months’.
American Intel was watching their initial moves, a push to have a strike option put into a UN resolution, and even getting Obama to say so stupidly on a Sunday night that he was still willing to use military force to ‘succeed’ with Iran, only to announce on the following Wednesday that he was open to a diplomatic solution. Mr. Nobel Peace prize was ‘open to it’ only after he had been forced to be.
In a last ditch effort the Zios bet the farm on a big UN move, and they picked last year’s cartoon character, Bibi the Bungler, to put on another comic attack as he took four flat tires off the Zio-Con mobile and replaced them with four more flat tires. The Intel community was shocked at the stupidity and even Israelis were publicly condemning the dead end strategy of the Likud gang.
The plan to rekindle the Iranians as holocaust deniers and nuclear extortionists went down in flames, but with a different after effect than we have seen in the past. There is a different tone in the air, where a light has come on and people are now asking,
“Why do we ALLOW the Zios to do this to us? Rather than being reactive to their moves, why shouldn’t we start getting proactive and begin shutting them down.” This is a huge shift in thinking, but one many of us have been pushing for a long time.
AIPAC’s army – what is called in the Intel trade…”front door espionage”.
The only part of America’s regime change foreign policy that we really need, the biggest threat we must eliminate, is the militant Zionist regime in Israel and the army they have forward deployed in the US. It should be our number one national security priority but that will not be easy.
We already see some smoke and mirrors attempts in Congress to play good guys on issues like the NSA massive domestic data gathering. This week they played two cards, a bill to stop the NSA from collecting such data, and an ‘independent investigation’ of all NSA’s spying activities.
Richard Clarke – when he was on the inside
Right at the top of their ‘independent’ list was suspected Israeli spy Richard Clarke of Bush (43) fame. While at the Pentagon, and involved in 911 and regime change planning he was under investigation by the FBI for spying for Israel.
In a typical move, the Bush regime quickly transferred him over to the White House where FBI agents could no longer interview him without the President’s permission. How is that for a little quick obstruction of justice, and all perfectly legal?
This really angered the loyal FBI people so they turned to what they have had to do in the past to stay on top of spies who have very high political protection.
Although that could never use the information they gathered in court because it would be inadmissible, they put a ‘watch’ on Clarke through communications surveillance and even had some White House people wear wires to get the good stuff.
Loyal Secret Service people have helped out in the god awful situations when there are protected traitors at the top.
By the way, Jonathan Pollard’s real handler was not in the Israeli embassy as reported for cover. He was in the White House, guiding him as to what documents to get, what their names were and how they were filed. Pollard never would have known what existed and where it was without someone steering him.
These things could come in handy – you might want to pick up a half dozen or so. I use a rubber mallet.
The key person to run such an operation would have been someone like a high National Security Council official. We have never heard an actual name mentioned, yet.
Such infiltrator people are groomed for years to maneuver into such a position. Our sources are solid on this, including one of the people who wore a wire.
I share this with you today as it has already been revealed at Veterans Today past articles, but I ask you to sharpen your wooden stakes because we now have the momentum to take the fight to the Zionists…and terminate it.
And as I have covered above they have a significant political human shield protecting them up to now which has really been impenetrable.
But the past fears of the Zionist Lobby here are now crumbling before our eyes, and it is the duty of all loyal Americans and institutions to support those who had stuck their necks out to get us to this point.
The final nail is in the coffin. We now learn that the NSA “routinely shares raw intelligence data with Israel without first sifting it to remove information about US citizens…
“Details of the intelligence-sharing agreement are laid out in a memorandum of understanding between the NSA and its Israeli counterpart that shows the US government handed over intercepted communications likely to contain phone calls and emails of American citizens. The agreement places no legally binding limits on the use of the data by the Israelis.”1
Israel is allowed to keep “any files containing the identities of US persons” for up to one year.
This is just a tip of the iceberg. The Guardian continues to say that in 2009, “the New York Times reported on ‘the agency’s attempt to wiretap a member of Congress, without court approval, on an overseas trip.’”2
Israel’s aggressive and wicked activities against the U.S. have been going on for years, and the National Intelligence Estimate itself “ranked them as the third most aggressive intelligence against the U.S.”3 One official admitted, “One of NSA’s biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence services, like Israel.”4
The Israeli regime has denied any of this. But the logic is pretty simple: the NSA virtually controls U.S. citizens through technologies such as Google, iPhone, Yahoo, etc., and the NSA reports to the Israelis. Since the NSA is acting illegally here, it “violated rules on surveillance of telephone records for almost three years and misled a secret court…”5
More recently, Google’s manager of information Heather Adkins has made it clear that “Passwords are dead.” If you think you were relying on passwords to secure some of your precious documents online, Adkins has news for you: the “game is over…our relationship with passwords are done.”6 We also learned that the NSA had access to Google documents as well.7
In a nutshell, the West is really outnumbered. In the previous article, I ended with the question, “Where are the men of the West?” A commentator responded,
“Off in their isolated world, asleep, on drugs, booze, wallowing in their own ignorance, hung up on TV watching, mainly professional sports, clinging to the delusions that so far given them a comfortable life. Watch them in the grocery checkout line. Well dressed, incommunicative, booze buyers. No sense of humour, a few items ‘the little woman’ told them to buy, aka mentally, detached whimps.”
Putin is a beacon of political light
While many of our fellow Americans are politically sleeping, Vladimir Putin once again has been giving us something that is far more rational than what the Zionist regime has been propounded for years. Putin declared,
“We [the Russian government] are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law. We need to use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos.
“The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether we like it or not. Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defense or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of aggression.
“No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists.”8
Putin is right in line with rational thought here. Even neoconservative shills such as Robert Spencer declare that Putin “talked a lot of sense,” though Spencer scolds Putin on other issues. Spencer continues to document quite rightly,
“Two Europeans who were allegedly abducted and held hostage for several months in Syria claim they overheard a conversation between their captors suggesting the Syrian rebels were behind the deadly chemical attack in Damascus…”
We agree with Spencer here. What he needs to do next is to tell neoconservatives such as Kristol, Tobin, McCain, Graham, to stop pushing Obama to invade Syria. Spencer keeps propounding that Obama wants to invade Syria, but Spencer cannot not tell us that the driving force behind this movement is the neoconservative mafia.
The Washington Times itself declares, “U.S. Intelligence has yet to uncover evidence that Syrian President Bashar Assad directly ordered the chemical attacks last month on civilians in a suburb of Damascus, though the consensus inside U.S. agencies and Congress is that members of Mr. Assad’s inner circle likely gave the command.”9
Bruce Riedel, a former CIA and heads of the Intelligence Project at the Brookings Institution, admitted, “As far as I know, there’s no intelligence that links [Mr. Assad] directly to the operation, so that does raise the question of command and control.”10
It has convincingly been pointed out that the Sarin gas that was used in Syria was made in the United States.11 Gordon Duff has an excellent article on this as well. The LA Timesconnects the dots by reporting that “Prosecutors in southern Turkey have alleged that Syrian rebel groups were seeking to buy materials that could be used to produce highly toxic sarin gas…”
The plot thickens. The Zionist regime seems to deliver Sarin gas to the Syrian rebels; the rebels then used it, and then blamed Assad for it. Once Assad is blamed, then the same Zionist regime asks for a regime change.
We are currently seeing the same thing with the NSA. The NSA recently admitted that it wrongly placed “16,000 phone numbers on an ‘alert list’ so their incoming calls could be monitored, a mistake that a judge from the secret surveillance court called a ‘flagrant violation’ of the law.”12 This has happen “frequently and systematically.”13
Being placed on an “alert list” can mean that you are a potential terrorist, and being a potential terrorist means that you are being watched, and being watched means that the Zionist regime has their eyes on you.
If you think this is far-fetched, the New York Police Department has already “labeled entire mosques as terrorist organizations,” according to the Associated Press. It is a vicious cycle: the Zionist regime invents terrorism and kills people and destroys nations in the name of fighting terrorism! No serious politician in the West has actually challenged that bloody Zionist matrix except Putin.
People may not like Putin for various reasons, but the Zionist political power is too strong to alienate people of good will. Moreover, Putin has made enough substantive arguments against the Zionist regime, such as the following:
“It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan ‘you’re either with us or against us.’
“But force has proved ineffective and pointless. Afghanistan is reeling, and no one can say what will happen after international forces withdraw. Libya is divided into tribes and clans. In Iraq the civil war continues, with dozens killed each day. In the United States, many draw an analogy between Iraq and Syria, and ask why their government would want to repeat recent mistakes.
“No matter how targeted the strikes or how sophisticated the weapons, civilian casualties are inevitable, including the elderly and children, whom the strikes are meant to protect…We must stop using the language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement.”14
Putin, who has been called all sorts of bad names, concludes, “We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”15
I personally would prefer Putin as president of the United States over Obama because Putin seems to have some political backbone and seems to understand what the Zionist power is doing to the West. Look at Greece, for example. Business Insider has recently declared that “Greece’s unemployment nightmare has gotten worse.”16
Who in his right mind would want another war in the Middle East, except enemies of the West and mankind? What country would want to send soldiers in another country to fight and die for a proxy war and does not want to send its own soldiers to fight for the same war?17
And if you do not think that the Zionist regime, most particularly the neoconservatives, has a hand in which political hermeneutic is loused up, think again. Jonathan S. Tobin of Commentary calls the Putin administration a “regime.”18
Joseph Klein of FrontPage declares that Putin is playing games with the United States and “his international monitoring proposal makes Machiavellian sense.”19
Not only that, Russia, according to Tobin, offers “a faux-diplomatic solution” that is very “fraudulent.”20
Tobin continues elsewhere, “president [Obama] displayed weakness by not going ahead and ordering an attack on his own authority against the Assad regime following its use of chemical weapons to murder a thousand people last month.”21
Pro-Israel and Jewish groups indirectly ended up saying almost the same thing by asking for a military strike against Syria.22 The Washington Post declares:
“The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a leading Jewish human rights organization, explicitly invoked the Holocaust in a letter to lawmakers Tuesday, noting that U.S. and British officials did not respond when they were alerted in 1942 that the Nazis planned to use gas to kill Jews.”23
What, then, does that say about the Simon Wiesenthal Center? It is an organization that is based on colossal hoaxes and fabrications.24
Zionism and the West
The questions that must seriously be answered by virtually any serious person are these:
How is it that Western countries in general universally fall into this double standard by pressing more sanctions on Iran and no sanctions on Israel, when the latter is an enemy of America and much of the West?25 How is it that countries like Spain are planning to make “Holocaust studies obligatory,”26 leaving the impression that the Nazi “Holocaust” is unique?
How is it that the neo-Bolsheviks/Zionists keep living in contradiction by saying that the Holocaust is unique but in the same breath invoke the same Holocaust story to invade other nations? How can Hitler be “unique” when Saddam and Assad are also Hitlers in the Zionist reading of things? How is it that even Taylor Swift “sounds a lot like Hitler,” according to one writer of the Jewish Journal?
How is it that the Zionist regime keeps violating the privacy of U.S. citizens and the majority of Western countries by snooping on them but the same regime produces a lava-like flow of media outrage when Edward Snowden snoops on them?
How is it that Jewish groups never cease to make ridiculous excuses in order to destroy other countries like Syria?27 How is it that neo-Bolshevik cells such as the Weekly Standard and Commentary never cease to lambaste Obama as a failure for not bombing Syria?
How is it that the Zionist regime will go to war with a sovereign country such as Syria in spite of the fact that the vast majority of Americans and even those who have served in Iraq do not want a Syria invasion?28
How is it that the Zionist regime continues to support a large section of Al-Qaeda when an Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri declared that he aspired to attack America in order to “bleed America economically”?
How is it that neoconservative shills such as Thomas Sowell cannot see the illogical leaps of their own worldview? I personally do not know how a smart person like Sowell cannot detect the contradictory nature of his conclusions.
At one point, Sowell argues that Obama is weak because he does not invade Syria, but then the same Sowell declares that “The Obama administration added more to the national debt in his first term than President Bush had in both his terms put together.”
Of course! Why did William Kristol call Obama “a born-again neocon”? It is because Obama has aggressively pursued the same neoconservative policy in the Middle East, which has contributed to the national debt.
Sowell cannot see this because he has been a neoconservative protégé and certainly has received great accolades from the Jewish World Review. How can all these happen in America and much of the West without a universal outrage?
The answer is simple: Rabbinic Judaism—the religion that has become “the synagogue of Satan” at the foot of the Cross—has never died out over the centuries and its theological and political implications are still waging war against all mankind, including decent Jews, Muslims, Christians, and even atheists and skeptics.
Lord Sacks, former Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew congregations of the Commonwealth, has even called Richard Dawkins an anti-Semite for criticizing the Old Testament! Dawkins is partly rational but he is certainly not an anti-Semite. Things didn’t get better for Dawkins when he said that Jews in America are “monopolizing American foreign policy.” Dawkins continues:
“When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told – religious Jews anyway – than atheists and (yet they) more or less monopolize American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place.”
Abe Foxman calls this “classic anti-Semitism.” Why is everyone an anti-Semite for criticizing the Jewish stronghold?
It is because the theological substratum of Rabbinic Judaism dominates the Zionist regime in Israel and America, particularly among dispensational premillennialists, or Christian Zionism. (We will look at a brief history of this movement in the next article.)
Israel: the mother of harlots
In the book of Revelation, Israel is called Babylon, “The Mother of Harlots and Abomination of the earth” (Revelation 17:5). Previously, the Apostle John declared that “the kings of the earth have committed fornication” with this Babylon “and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication” (Revelation 17:2).
Babylon was a name in the Old Testament which signified an enemy of God’s people. After the resurrection of Christ, Jerusalem theologically came to be identified as Babylon in the book of Revelation. In the words of one scholar, Jerusalem has become ‘the implacable enemy of God” and joined other nations “in the attempted overthrow of the King.”29 The “King” here is of course Christ.
According to New Testament scholar G. K. Beale, Babylon clearly “refers to apostate Israel.”30 Gary DeMar likewise declares that “there is little doubt that the Babylon of Revelation is the first-century city of Jerusalem.”31
The hostility has changed shapes and forms over the ages, but it has always come back in the form of a deep-seated hatred toward the Logos and virtually anyone or any country associated with Logos. This hostility has jumped from one revolutionary movement to another, and every society that has left the Logos and embraced Jewish subversive activity has suffered deeply. Civilta Cattolica had it right in the 1890s by making these points very clear.
“[I]f New York was outsourced to the Mossad and if the Twin Towers were nuked, then the nukes that were used must have been Israeli….[N]o alternative explanation is reasonable.”–Jim Fetzer
How many wars is the US supposed to fight for Israel? How many of our sons and daughters must die? How much of our national treasury and moral standing must be squandered to insure Israeli domination of the Middle East?
Does any serious analyst actually believe that the Syrian government–which has been routing the rebels for the past several months–would jeopardize its standing in the eyes of the world by launching a gas attack when he has no reason to do so?
Does anyone believe that doing so on the eve of the arrival of a UN inspection team would be rational? Are the American people so stupid and gullible that we are going to fall for the same “song and dance” from the nation’s leaders who so completely misled us about the massive surveillance being conducted by the NSA?
The lied to us about Iraq. They lied to us about Libya. They lied to us about Iran. And what could be more obvious than that they are lying to us again about Syria? The US is wreaking havoc in the Middle East for Israel. We have become Israeli liars, enforcers, stooges and dupes!
The absurdity of the American position by claiming that it needs to punish Bashar Assad for the violation of international law was apparent today when Charles Heyman, a former British officer who edits The Armed Forces of the UK, observed that attacking Syria without a mandate from the UN Security Council would itself be a gross violation of international law, rather like the claims made during the Vietnam war that “they had to destroy the village in order to save it”! Under Barack Obama, the US has become an international joke.
The most powerful proof, ironically, comes from dust samples collected by the USGS, which substantiate the presence of elements that would not be present in this form had the destruction of the Twin Towers not been a nuclear event. Those include:
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
But the proof also includes the dramatic incidence of cancers associated with nuclear events, where, as Jeff Prager has observed, (a) Multiple Myeloma in the general population at a rate of 3-9 incidents per 100,000 people, but the rate was 18 per 100,000 among first responders; (b) that other cancers relatively unusual cancers have appeared among the responders, including non-Hodgkins lymphoma, leukemia, thyroid, pancreatic, brain, prostate, esophageal and blood and plasma cancers; and (c) that, as of March 2011 no less than 1,003 first responders died from various cancers. Those familiar with the available evidence who continue to deny that 9/11 was a nuclear event would appear to be either cognitively impaired or deliberately deceptive.
How it was done
Unlike WTC-7, which was destroyed by a classic controlled demolition, where all the floors fell at the same time, none of its floors were blown apart, and there was a stack of debris equal to 12% of the original height of the 47-story building (about 5.5 floors of debris). The Twin Towers were blow apart sequentially from the top down, they were converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust, each floor remained stationary until its turn came and, when it was over, the buildings had been destroyed below ground level: there was no stack debris (which should have been around 12 floors high). They did not collapse. They were blown apart using mini or micro nukes, which too many have continued to deny for too long.
Click on link to watch video and read full report:
Pity the American People for They Live in a Jewish Run Democracy
“A shocking crime was committed on the unscrupulous initiative of few individuals, with the blessing of more, and amid the passive acquiescence of all”.
This quote has been repeated in many forms by many American Presidents since George Washington, by patriotic American politicians, diplomats, militiary officers, academicians, few journalists, and a few courageous American citizens of all faiths especially Christians, and Jewish Americans who stand firm despite the hate, death threats, and alienation from the Jewish community.
They repeatedly warned America of a “passionate attachment” to a foreign nation due to the power of a minority in America with true allegiance to that foreign nation and not to the interests of the United states. They warned us that this “faction”, i.e. special interest, will ensure that the U.S.will be forced to take on the enemies of that nation, be involved in its wars, and have the uninformed American taxpayer fund the economic and military budget of that foreign nation. They warned that Americans will die in service to that nation.
President George Washington warned that the U.S. will become a “Slave” to that foreign nations if such a powerful “special interest” is allowed to corrupt the political system of the country thereby giving it the power to formulate domestic and foreign policies and not the citizens of this nation.
The warning was never heeded due to greedy ambitious politicians willing to spend the treasury and blood of this nation as “slaves” to a foreign nation: ISRAEL via AIPAC. — i.e. JEWISH POWER.
One of America’s most courageous and patriotic men, Michael Scheuer, who for 20 years was a CIA Analyst and headed the Osama Bin Laden Counter Terrorism Task Force has spoken and written repeatedly about the powerful but dangerous control and influence of the Israel Lobby on U.S. Foreign Policy. Despite his enormous experience and the honesty with which he speaks he’s hardly ever invited on TV as an “expert” on terrorism or U.S. Foreign Policy given that his truth contradicts the manufactured lies and myths of the U.S. government and its co-sonspirators in the media and the military-industrial complex which reaps billions from the holocaust against civilians around the world.
Please watch this video to hear Mr. Michael Scheuer.
America, do read the quote below over, and over, and over, until it sinks in as to whom is running Americans’ foreign policy in the Middle East and notice this was said in 1957,
“I am aware how almost impossible it is in this country to carry out a foreign policy [in the Middle East] not approved by the Jews. Marshall (referring to Secretary of State George Marshall) and Forrestal (referring to Secretary of Defense) learned that…. terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the barrage the Jews have built up on congressmen …. I am very much concerned over the fact that the Jewish influence here is completely dominating the scene and making it almost impossible to get congress to do anything they don’t approve of. The Israeli embassy is practically dictating to the congress through influential Jewish people in the country” – Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in February 1957 (Donald Neff’s book: “Fallen Pillars” page 99)
Since President Wilson Jews have played the dominant role in U.S. Foreign Policy forcing Wilson’s hand to enter World War I. Israel has used America as a “weapon of mass destruction” against the Palestinians and Arabs whose land they have stolen, annexed, and occupy. These peoples simply seek their legitimate right to reclaim their stolen lands and be free from Israel’s illegal occupation.e and to recover their legitimate right to their lands live free from Israel’s murderous illegal occupation. But in Israel’s America, Israel is the victim and the Arabs are the aggressors.
The theft of Palestine and America’s entry into World War 1:was due to the wealth and power of Zionist Jews in Britain and the U.S. To the British “gifting” Palestine to the Zionists was simply a quid pro quo: Get America into the war and we’ll issue a proclamation that Palestine can be your Zionist homeland, hence the Balfour Declaration.
“On April 5, 1917 the British government announced that it was sending Rt. Hon. Arthur James Balfour, the Foreign Secretary, to the United States, to notify the American bankers that the British government was prepared to officially endorse their plans for political Zionism provided they would bring America into the war (WWI) on the side of the Allies. America came into the war”. —William Guy Carr; in his book “Pawns in the Game”, 1958
After the sudden resignation of Senator George Mitchell as Obama’s envoy to the Israeli Palestinian conflict (the only Gentile to hold that position), Obama needed to appoint another envoy, but that position is automatically reserved for Jews so that they serve Israel’s interests and not the interest of the U.S. or peace. Unfortunately American Gentiles are not qulaified for this position.
Martin Indyk, a Pro Israel Zionist, and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
So Obama appoints a Jew, Martin Indyk, as MidEast envoy. Indyk a devout Zionist, a man who worked in AIPAC and founded the Zionist think tank the “Washington Institute for Near East Policy”, a think tank that serves as Israel’s mouthpiece, providing Congressmen with background material, opinions to share and write in the media, and easy talking points that if repeated often enough become mainstream opinion in the country. The staff, members, and board of directors reads like a who’s who in foreign policy circles who constantly write oped pieces that are automatically published.
While serving as Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk was suspended by the State Department and stripped of his security clearance without any explanation to the public. The only public statement issued said he was suspended due to his violation of security standards. The suspension occurred while he was involved in the Israeli Palestinian talks at that time. The suspension meant Indyk will be denied access to classified information and will be prevented from attending meetings where classified information is discussed. Naturally the suspension was lifted, he returned to work, and the American public was never told the truth of the matter. One can only suspect he shared classified information with Israel; although such incidents are a daily occurrence in Washington D.C. and Israel is never held accountable.
Yet, regardless, our Presidents prefer a disgraced Jew as an envoy to an honorable respectable Gentile.
Aaron Miller, a former Jewish diplomat in the State Department and another envoy to the Israeli Palestinian talks courageously revealed in a Washington Post article titled “Israel’s Lawyer” published May 23, 2005, that in such peace talks the U.S. acts like “Israel’s Lawyer” and not as an honest broker.
“I’m not a lawyer by training, but I know one when I see one. For far too long, many American officials involved in Arab-Israeli peacemaking, myself included, have acted as Israel’s attorney, catering and coordinating with the Israelis at the expense of successful peace negotiations. If the United States wants to be an honest and effective broker on the Arab-Israeli issue, than surely it can have only one client: the pursuit of a solution that meets the needs and requirements of both sides”.
Being Pro Israel is the only ‘LITMUS TEST” for Senatorial Confirmation of appointees:
Any candidate or appointee who must be confirmed by the Senate needs only one qualification: Does he/she support Israel and do they renounce and apologize for any past comments against Israel. To the Senate, nothing else matters.
We all recall the outrageous humiliation Senator Chuck Hagel endured in his confirmation hearings where he was repeatedly attacked by both political parties for comments perceived as Anti-Israel such as “I’m an American Senator, not an Israeli Senator”. After his humiliation and repentance he was confirmed.
Similarly Samantha Power, Obama’s nominee as U.N. Ambassador, underwent the same Pro Israel Senatorial “Litmus Test” attack during her confirmation hearings. Her sin was that in 2002 she suggested an international intervention may be necessary in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Realizing that she must kowtow to the Israel Lobby’s Senate she disavowed that statement and said she will work tirelessly as U.N. Ambassador to “defend Israel”, saying she would “go on offense and defense” to stop UN criticism of Israel.
Incredulously she also said that she would work to secure a seat on the UN Security Council for Israel as a non-member. She also accused the U.N. of an “unacceptable bias”.against Israel, not withstanding the U.S. has an inherent bias at the U.N. for Israel given its automatic Vetoes against any resolution critical of Israel.
Apparently the primary purpose of our elected officials from the White House to Congress, is to serve, spend, fight for, and defend Israel at all costs even if it harms the national interests.
Israel’s foray into the African scene began in an unforgettable fashion; it was 1973 and the Yom Kippur war was raging across much of the Sinai Desert, the Golan Heights and on the Suez Canal itself. The Egyptians had just achieved an element of surprise, crossed the no-mans land and overran fortified Israeli positions that were built in the peninsular following its seizure by the IDF in the Suez Crisis of 1956.
From the brink of defeat, thanks to the strategic military blunders of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and the massive air-lift of new equipment by the United States, Israel was able to beat back the Egyptian assault and launch a counter-strike spearheaded by units under the command of Ariel Sharon who identified a gap in the Egyptian defensive line and consequently executed a pincer which saw Israeli forces crossing to the African side of the canal to cut-off and completely encircle the Egyptian 3rd Army.
This action borne out of war time necessity created a diplomatic uproar in African capitals which resulted in an unanimous decision by the members of the Organization for African Unity (O.A.U)- a predecessor of today’s African Union, to sever all ties with the Zionist regime.
Further incidents such as the Israeli Commando Raid in Entebbe and its close collaboration with the Apartheid regime of South Africa also played a crucial role in shaping Israel’s image as an aggressive and unfriendly imperialist colonial entity in the African psyche, a foreign policy disaster Israel may never recover from.
Despite its direct bearing on its legitimacy and the long-term consequences, for much of the 70s and 80s, Israel continued to take an antagonistic posture in its relationship with Africa, the extent of which can never be underestimated.
“Israel provided expertise and technology that was central to South Africa’s development of its nuclear bombs” and according to Dieter Gerhardt, a Soviet spy and former commander in the South African Navy, Israel agreed in 1974 to arm eight Jericho II missiles with “special warheads” for South Africa.
This recent revelations of Israel’s nascent activities in Africa made it impossible to look at the writings of Theodore Herzl, the father of political Zionism with anything but surprise and contempt, for it is he who once said “once I have witnessed the redemption of the Jews, my people, I wish also to assist in the redemption of the Africans.”
Herzl should be turning in his grave, his words are as empty as the racist ideological misconceptions that inspire it. A classic illustration of such unwarranted insults that are a vivid reminder of the now outdated and discredited idea of the “White Man’s Burden” was glaringly visible in the recent movie Django Unchained, directed by Tarantino- a known champion of Theodore Herzl’s legacy.
Of Mist & Shadow, The Case of South Sudan
In April 2012, Sudan’s al-Intiba newspaper reported that “Israeli jets have been landing at a Sudan airport at 3 am every day unloading missiles, military equipment and African mercenaries”, only five months after “The IAF allegedly bombed two land cruiser vehicles, killing four passengers.
A second attack was reportedly carried out on December 18 in which a car had been bombed and all its passengers killed. It was also reported that an Israeli Apache helicopter landed in an area where South Sudanese army radar stations are located.”
This is merely a glimpse into the reality of a conflict that has been going on for decades, with every possible mention of the huge trail of Israeli presence and participation in the theater completely obliterated from the script of the international mainstream media.
It is yet early to write a conclusive account of the role Israel played in the destabilization and Balkanization of the Sudan, but subsequent developments which followed South Sudan’s secession such as the dependence of the ruling former S.P.L.A guerrillas on Israeli Military support and the immediate signing of oil deals with several Israeli companies which effectively gave Israel a big slice of South Sudan’s huge oil wealth points to a more sinister past.
Of manufactured rebellions and bloody insurgencies, of conflicts artificially designed to drain African nations of valuable resources, of spreading chaos and arming brutal criminal groups that are known for their genocidal atrocities and the strong support they receive from a shadow entity.
The arrest and conviction of Yair Klein, a former lieutenant colonel in the Israeli Army who spent 16 months in a Sierra Leonean prison on charges that he was smuggling arms to rebels from the Revolutionary United Front (RUF)- the terrorist gang of bloodthirsty thugs who gave the phrase “Blood Diamonds” its horrific connotation, is not just a story of a cold-hearted mercenary but an indictment of the forces he represents.
The UN Security Council’s panel of experts on Liberia established in 2000 revealed that Israel was at the heart of a shadowy international network of support for the RUF, involving Liberian, South African, Kenyan, and Ukrainian arms suppliers and diamond mining interests.
Counting the Cost
LOONY-TUNES: Nigeria & The False-Flag Fiasco
Recently, the Nigerian Newspaper Daily Trust reported the discovery of a huge arms cache in Bompai Kano by the men of the Nigerian Army. The underground depot was found at the residence of a Lebanese expatriate. What is most significant about this find is the volume and quantity of sophisticated weaponry and munitions.
The inventory which includes a variety of sub-machine guns, Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPG), Anti-Tank Missiles, 700 Standard Issue Grenades, Military Grade Explosives and Anti-Aircraft Surface to Air Missiles. In short, enough firepower to start a serious debacle and cause significant damage to the fragile peace in Nigeria.
This incident is just another in a series of unexplained mysteries that demand a careful appraisal if the trend of instability and criminal violence is to be contained.
The facts on the ground are pointing ever closer to the possibility that the country is indeed a new theatre in the phony ‘war on terror’ and as such we may be witnessing a new incarnation of the age-old strategy for destabilization in the guise of False-Flag Terrorism.
Connecting the Dots
In late 2006, Eliav Hommossany– an Israeli with ties to Mossad and Shin Bet was arrested and charged with espionage in Nigeria. The Israeli Newspaper Haaretz reported that Eliav was suspected of infiltrating Nigeria’s Defense Ministry and with the assistance of some corrupt Nigerian officials; he succeeded in obtaining classified documents. No Nigerian Media printed the story, and neither did they do so in 2009 when a similar incident re-occurred.
Among the troves of U.S Diplomatic Cables released by the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks, one particular document (C O N F I D E N T I A L ABUJA 001292 ) entitled “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” makes for a fascinating reading.
Its revelation of the widespread activities of Israeli Defense Contractors operating in Nigeria and Conducting Operations ranging from VIP-protection to running Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) with the tacit and informal approval of Nigeria’s security establishment is if anything, timely.
Since 2010, The Israeli Ambassador Mr Moshe Ram has been interfering in Nigeria’s internal politics by taking sides on sensitive issues which foments disunity and incites inter-tribal tensions.
It is on public record that in the past year alone, the Ambassador has confused defending the policies of his right-wing Likud government with spreading black propaganda, encouraging Islamophobia and capitalizing on the unique nature of Nigeria’s political situation by jumping on topics which antagonizes the South against the Muslim-majority Northern Nigeria. Is this not Divide & Conquer?
Israeli Companies make huge profits in defense contracts awarded as a result of the growing insurgency. They supply the Nigerian Government with everything from arms, surveillance equipment to Unmanned Drones deployed in the fight against Boko Haram.
They were recently selected as one of the two countries to train battalions of Nigeria’s Counter-Insurgency and Counter-Terrorism personnel. These are just a few of the economic gains which Israel reaps from the ongoing crisis, for without the suicide bombs and terror attacks; there would be no demand for such deadly wares.
In a new scandal, the Nigerian President is currently facing widespread public outrage over a $40 Million contract awarded to Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems which would reportedly enable the Nigerian government to surveil all Internet activity, an eerily familiar attack on civil liberties reminiscent of the larger NSA PRISM program exposed by Snowden which also bears the involvement of Israeli Companies.
This unconstitutional arrangement has created “a lot of apprehension among Nigerians, now concerned that their country might be sliding back to dictatorship,” wrote Premium Times, an Abuja based daily newspaper.
The final nail in the coffin of the massive Israeli espionage program was further exposed as a result of a cyber-operation against Mossad carried out by the Hacker Collective Anonymous which uncovered “a hidden network of 30,000 covert operatives, some openly labeled hitmen.”
The Perverse and Dark Side of Christian Zionism (Part I)
“I don’t believe that the Jewish State and Modern Zionism would have been possible without Christian Zionism. I think that the many Christian supporters of the rebirth of the Jewish State and the ingathering of the Jewish people in the 19th century made possible the rise of…modern Jewish Zionism.”—Benjamin Netanyahu
Benjamin Netanyahu, the man who has been a pathological liar with respect to Iran’s nuclear program, was telling the truth here.
By the middle of the 19th century, the birth of Dispensational Premillennialism made Zionism ideologically possible and acceptable among mainline Protestants.
Tim LaHaye, Jerry Jenkins and Hal Lindsey did not invent that system. As we shall see in the series, it has been around for at least one hundred years, and date-setters with their failed predictions have always found fresh audiences to propagate the system as well.
There is also a lot of money to be made. Historian Paul Boyer has noted that by 1979, apocalyptic books had become a lucrative industry.
Tim LaHaye has been known to trade his Christian value for the almighty dollar. He sued a Canadian Christian film company, but the federal judge threw the case out of court.
LaHaye also hired people like Michael Ovitz, who worked for celebrities like Michael Douglas, Tom Cruise, Kevin Cosner, Madonna, Barbra Streisand, Sylvester Stallone, and Steven Seagal, in order to get a forty-five million dollar deal with one of New York’s major publishing houses, Bantam Books. Born into a Jewish family, Ovitz was former president of Walt Disney from 1995 until 1997.
LaHaye got into trouble in the 1980s because it was reported that he received $10,000 from Bo Hi Pak, a sort of protégé of the late Korean-born religious leader Sun Myung Moon. Moon was widely known in the Protestant evangelical world to be a cult leader.
LaHaye disappointed mainline Protestant evangelicals by getting funds from Moon’s organization. Later, LaHaye accepted the invitation of being on the board of directors of Moon’s group, Christian Voice. Moon also had other branches, and LaHaye was happy to join in. Beverly, LaHaye’s wife, “spoke at a Moon event in Washington, D.C., as recently as 1996.”
By 2002, the marriage between the secular and the sacred for the almighty dollar was two sides of the same coin with respect to Jewish ideology. Many big secular companies tried for years to get their hands on big-time Christian booksellers, and sometimes those secular publishers refuse to publish the big ones only when it comes to the conversion of the Jews.
Jewish spokesman for Random House, Stuart Applebaum, recalled that as a publicist for Bantam Books in the 1970’s,
“I did not want to work on a book that was advocating conversion of Jews to Christianity. I just personally didn’t want to work on a book like that.”
Applebaum’s brother, Irwyn, took a different view in 2002. He paid Tim LaHaye $45 million for a series of new novels. It was obvious, then, that LaHaye would return the favor in a positive light.
LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins have a rabbi declaring in Glorious Appearing, “Jesus will judge you Gentiles on how you have treated His chosen people. Those who honored the Jews are the sheep, and those who did not are the goats.”
This sheep-and-goats illustration is taken from Matthew 25 in the New Testament, and the passage does not even mention Jews. It is talking about those who obeyed Christ’s commandments and those who do not. For ideological and lucrative purposes, LaHaye and Jenkins have turned the passage into something that it is not and in the process have desperately and foolishly made it compatible with Christian Zionism.
What we are progressively seeing here is that people like LaHaye and Jenkins have been bought with a price in order to say these kinds of things. Even the New York Times noticed that a large section of evangelical books were aiming at big bucks and in the process were not dealing with serious issues, but with “vernacular psychotherapy.”
By 1988, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns big-time publishers such as HarperCollins and HarperOne, bought Zondervan, the Christian publisher. By 2011, the same company had also bought Thomas Nelson “for an undisclosed sum.” In 2006, Thomas Nelson’s music business was also bought for $473 million, and now has Jane Friedman as its CEO.
Rupert Murdoch worked closely with Israelis to destroy rival competitors, and we know that Murdoch’s company has been involved in hacking as well, although the Murdoch family denied they were aware of the illegal activity.
Just two days after Murdoch’s son James resigned as chairman of Sky News, the company admitted that they were involved in hacking into emails. The company admitted that the hacking was illegal, but said it was authorized by its executives, which leads one to conclude that the executives—including Murdoch’s son, James—knew what they were doing.
This was not just one incident, but involved “phone hacking, e-mail hacking and paying bribes to public officials at two Murdoch-owned tabloids, The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World.” Right after the public was made aware of these activities, protesters outside a London court put out signs which said “End the Murdoch Mafia.”
It was later discovered that Rebekah Brooks, former head of the Murdoch newspaper and a close friend of Prime Minister David Cameron, was charged “with perverting the course of justice in the phone hacking scandal.” It was said that Brooks, who has been arrested twice for the same charges, “tried to hide or destroy files and equipment” in order to absolve herself and the company from illegal activities.
The political vectors, then, seem to be quite obvious: although David Cameron has criticized Israel and called the Gaza strip a “prison camp,” his Jewish associates seem to have convinced him to take a different view. The Economist reported:
“The other Mr Cameron is Israel’s loyal friend. That version was on display on March 2nd, when the prime minister spoke to the Community Security Trust, a British Jewish group. He said his ‘belief in Israel’ was ‘indestructible’; discussing Israel’s security needs, Mr Cameron veered away from the European consensus towards the sort of robust view more typically heard in Washington, DC. He said Israel was ‘within its rights to search vessels bringing cargo into Gaza.’”
Brooks, along with another Murdoch associate named Andy Coulson, was to be charged with paying $160,000 in bribes to public officials. Yet even after all this, Brooks was found “not guilty.” Right after she resigned from her hacking job, Brooks got a whopping $17.5 million exit package.
In other words, it is very hard for some Zionists to spend some time in jail. And if they did actually go to jail, the neo-Bolsheviks will try very hard to get them out. Hosni Mubarak for example has already been released from his jail cell.
Mubarak was a Zionist shill as soon as he ascended to the dictatorial throne and even liquidated opposing parties.During his reign, people were held captive without trials, torture places were built, and opposing views simply had no chance. During the 2011 Egyptian uprising, the Mubarak regime tortured multiplied hundreds of people across the country.
In addition, “More than 1,000 people, including many prisoners, are said to have gone missing during the 18 days of the revolt. Scores turned up in Egypt’s morgues, shot or bearing signs of torture. Many have simply disappeared, leaving behind desperate families who hope, at best, that their loved ones are serving prison sentences that the government does not acknowledge” 
The Associated Press reported last year:
“Under Mubarak, tens of thousands of political prisoners were detained under emergency laws that expired last week after 31 years in force.” An Egyptian rights group declared,
“Torture is the official state policy and not only the responsibility of an officer here or there. The same torture practices were repeatedly used in detention centres… including ‘beatings, flogging, burning with lit cigarette butts, rape threats, covering eyes, stripping the detainees naked… Sexual abuse and rape were common, particularly in fighting Islamists such as the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood,’”
During those dark times, Susan Fayyad, director for the Nadim Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence, declared,
“Torture in Egyptian police station is regular, systematic, and widespread. Every person who walks into a police station risks falling victim of torture.”
And Both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch admitted that torture was rampant under Mubarak.
The Neo-Bolsheviks financially supported torture in Egypt
Yet Newsweek reported that the Obama administration gave Egypt $1.5 billion in 2010. The New York Times reported the same thing. Why? Because the Mubarak regime “supports America’s pro-Israel policies, especially by helping Israel maintain its stranglehold on Gaza.”
In other words, Mubarak was paid by the neo-Bolsheviks in America to do Zionism’s dirty work.
Mubarak himself was reported to have amassed somewhere between 40 to 70 billion dollars over a period of thirty years. Amaney Jamal of Princeton notes that “There was a lot of corruption in this regime and stifling of public resources for personal gain.”
Mubarak also “had close relations” with Israeli Prime ministers “Yitzhak Rabin and Benjamin Netanyahu.” After Mubarak eventually left his political dictatorship, Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government even offered him political asylum.
When the Egyptian people finally rose up to challenge the Mubarak regime in January 2111, an incident which led to a public demonstration, Jewish historian David Cesarani declares:
“The outcome of a Tiananmen Square-style crackdown is desirable and is predictable.”
Just in case you don’t remember what a Tiananmen crackdown actually is, it is a military crackdown where civilians and peaceful demonstrators can be brutally and severally beaten and clubbed to death. This was what happened in China in 1989 when the government massacred protestors.
This actually shocked Brendan O’Neil of The Telegraph, England. “And there has been no outrage. No Twitter-storm, no blog-based apoplexy, no heated radio phone-ins,” wrote O’Neil. Not only that, Matthew Taylor, a former advisor to Tony Blair, declares that Cesarani was “incredibly brave” and “in a way, I can see his argument.”
Imagine a David Irving making such a remark on Jews or any other people, what would have happened to that person? Certainly O’Neil got a point when he said that those who are crying out for democracy in the Middle East, particularly the neoconservatives who pushed the war in Iraq, are not indeed looking for democracy but are trying to implement their own ideology.
The Definition of Chutzpah
Going back to Murdoch, who was one of his trusted advisors? It was none other than Joel Klein, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, which also happens to be the largest public school system in the United States. Klein worked hand in hand with Murdoch’s company to incorporate a new system called Wireless Generation.
This “Wireless Generation” was supposedly seeking to implement education software into the system, which the majority of school teachers opposed. In 2011, New York State was going to strike a deal with Murdoch’s company, but it was rejected because the company was still under investigation. It is said that Murdoch and Klein “became close friends,” and as such they understood each other with respect to public schools in New York in particular.
When the news broke that Murdoch’s company was charged with hacking, it was Klein who “advised on handling the scandal, sitting behind Mr. Murdoch during his first testimony before a parliamentary panel in summer 2011 and spending hours in London helping Mr. Murdoch prepare for a second round of questions last month.”
In return, Klein amassed $4.5 million in 2011 alone from Murdoch’s company. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, who has been watching these events very closely, declared that the scandal was “the definition of chutzpah.” Perhaps rightly so. But this “definition of chutzpah” has crept in the Christian Zionist movement as well.
LaHaye is hardly the only person to have been duped by this definition of chutzpah. Many big Christian publishers found out in the early 1980s that talking about Dispensational eschatology means big business, and a number of them were ready to cash in on the trend.
For example, “In 1977, ABC acquired Word Books, a Waco evangelical house with a thriving prophecy list; in 1988, Harper and Row paid some $57 million for Zondervan, a major prophecy publisher.”
Hal Lindsey’s Late Great Planet Earth (1970) sold more than 28 million copies, while movies of the same genre were sweeping the land. Apocalyptic books such as Destined for the Throne sold 650,000 copies.
John F. Walvoord’s Armageddon, Oil, and the Middle East Crises sold 750,000 copies. Major Christian publishers rarely published non-Dispensational books largely because the market only accepts books that will sell well.
Although many of the predictions in Walvoord’s book turned out to be false, the book still had a great impact on many evangelicals. In the book, Walvoord argued that before the Armageddon countdown, “the Middle East must become the number one crisis in the world.”
In a nutshell, the Christian Zionist movement would be happy if the Middle is in crisis, and some would be sad if the Middle East does not have crisis. What the Christian Zionist ends up saying indirectly is that it is a good when children are being blown up by drones, when civilians are being killed by the thousands, when heads are being chopped off by the Syrian rebels/terrorists. This is what happened to one Dispensationalist when he finally woke up and realized that what he was taught by Dispensationalists simply was wrong.
“I can remember coming down the mountain from L’Abri [Francis Schaeffer’s school] and expecting the stock market to cave in, a priestly elite to take over American government, and enemies to poison the drinking water. I was almost disappointed when these things did not happen.”
As we shall see in the following articles, Christian Zionism or Dispensatioal Premillenialism cannot be understood without a thorough historical understanding of the Judaizing movement which got its jumpstart in the fifteenth century, culminating in the formation of the nation of Israel, and then dominating mainline evangelicals.
In the process, many mainline evangelicals literally have no clue of what is really taking place here. Others deliberately have signed pacts with the “Synagogue of Satan” for political and monetary purposes. John Hagee and Jerry Falwell are classic examples.
Christian Persecutions in Israel
Serious Christians have never been treated well in Israel. I have pointed out in an article that once a Jew in America becomes a non-Zionist Christian, he will be denied Israeli citizenship in Israel—even if his ancestors died in the Holocaust—yet any other Jew can get citizenship with no problem. Most evangelicals who have been duped by the Zionist ideology are not aware of this.
Ideologue Michael Oren, an Israeli ambassador to the United States, portrays Israel in a different light. He said:
“Christians are prominent in all aspects of Israeli life, serving in the Knesset, the Foreign Ministry and on the Supreme Court…Israeli Arab Christians are on average more affluent than Israeli Jews and better-educated, even scoreing higher on their SATs.”
This has not been the experience of Fida Jirvis, a Palestinian Christian, nor has it been the experience of many non-Zionist Christian groups. For example, Roy Tov used to serve at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and wrote a book about the ideology of the Zionist regime. For that, “the Mossad targeted him for assassination.”
Tov declares that it is hard for an outsider to believe that “even the lives of secular Jews in Israel are regulated by Pharisaic rabbis. Israel lacks a constitution or proper secular legislation.” One of Tov’s biggest mistakes was that he converted to Christianity, which to him “poses a singular threat to Jewish leadership.”
Judaism, Tov continues, is about “an ethnic salvation” of the Jews, while Christianity is universal, which is another way of saying that it deals with the “salvation or redemption of the human soul” everywhere. It is no coincidence, Tov says, that “Jesus was considered an enemy from the beginning. His teachings and New Testament were banned.” During his school days,
“Jesus and His period were scarcely mentioned in Israeli history classes. Instead, greater emphasis was placed on deviant Christians who moved away from His teachings and committed atrocities. The Spanish Inquisition was a central topic; the tortures were studied in excruciating detail. In that way, few of us would feel inclined to learn more about Christianity and the priests would keep their positions and the huge material and political benefits accompanying them. We were encouraged to fear Christianity.”
This is the true story of serious Christians in Israel. Both the neocons and Israeli officials have deliberately failed to tell the American people that they use deceptions to seduce mainline evangelicals. The official motto of the Mossad is, “Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Make War,” and this official motto “is deeply related to the modern word for ‘terrorism.’”
Yet when 60 Minutes tried to broadcast the story of Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinian Christians, Michael Oren told the network to kill the story before it aired, something that actually shocked the network! When they ran it anyway, Ilan Troen of Brandeis University faulted Bob Simon of 60 Minutes for being “malicious” for presenting the broadcast.
Mark Tooley of the Weekly Standard also faulted the network for portraying Israel as an anti-Christian nation and argued that the presentation was unfair. Jonathan S. Tobin of Commentary called the broadcast “preposterous.”
Why the outcry? Because Israeli officials and the neoconservative hawks do not want to give evangelical Christians the impression that Israel does not really support Christians. Evangelical Christians have been duped by Israel’s deception for decades, and those officials want to keep it that way. One official declared,
“The relationship between Israel and the Christian world is our strategic interest, and when we received several months ago information about this report and that it was planned for broadcast without any reaction by Israeli officials, Ambassador Oren did what a diplomat is supposed to do to prevent serious damage.”
Bob Simon rightly pointed out,
“For Israel, there could be serious economic consequences. According to Israeli government figures, tourism is a multi-billion dollar business there. Most tourists are Christian. Many of them are American. That’s one reason why Israelis are very sensitive about their image in the United States.”
It is not just economic consequences that Israeli officials fear, but that someday Christian Zionists will discover that they have been lied to for decades.
Within days, Christians United for Israel, spearheaded by John Hagee, sent letters to 60 Minutes asking for an apology for the broadcast. At least 22,000 supporters joined in.
When Christians are being persecuted by the Israelis, this should be ignored and should not be mentioned in not one of many neoconservative propaganda magazines such as the Weekly Standard, Commentary, FrontPage, National Review, etc. Recently, the Daily Star in Lebanon reported,
“Unknown assailants threw a Molotov cocktail at a Roman Catholic monastery in Israel and scrawled racist graffiti on its walls, a police spokeswoman said Wednesday, in a suspected hate crime. Hebrew graffiti was also scrawled on the monastery walls, reading ‘Gentiles perish’ and ‘revenge.’
“In past years, Christian sites in Israel have been targets of hate crimes by suspected Jewish extremists. These incidents come in addition to attacks against mosques, which have been linked to the ‘price tag’ campaign of Israeli extremists opposed to state moves to dismantle unauthorized settler outposts.”
Neoconservative authors such as Robert Spencer and Raymond Ibrahim would not mention this any time soon.
In a nutshell, Israel, “the problem child,” will never be satisfied until the entire Western world (including Christian Zionism) is reduced to abject servitude. You give “the problem child” $3 billion this year, the “problem child” will ask for more. In the process, America, as one Russian television has put it, has become “The United States of Israel.”
William Kristol and Winston Churchill Face Off
Willim Kristol, one of the political and intellectual clowns of the neoconservative movement, has recently quoted Winston Churchill to this effect:
“Force, or perhaps force and bribery, are the only things that will be respected. It is very sad, but we had all better recognize it. At present our friendship is not valued, and our enmity is not feared.”
The simple fact is that Kristol could not quote Churchill fully and extensively because Churchill would literally destroy his Jewish/neo-Bolshevik interpretation of the Middle East and history.
Kristol will never tell his readers that it was Churchill who wrote the devastating essay “Zionism versus Bolshevism,” in which he unequivocally declared that Jewish revolutionaries will “shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible.”
Christianity has rendered possible the foundation of the West, logos in all its manifestations, and the brotherhood for all peoples and salvation for all mankind. Jewish revolutionaries have and will attempt to overthrow all this and replace it with a Jewish bloodbath in the Middle East and in much of the West.
When the Jewish bloodbath was over in the Soviet Union, it moved to Asia, where it literally exterminated 45 million people in just one country in less than six years. And then we are recently witnessing almost the same phenomena in the Middle East, though on a gradual scale. Churchill put it best:
By Christopher Bollyn and Edited and updated by Stew Webb Whistleblower
Christopher Bollyn, I want to thank you for the kind and generous words and the great work you have and are doing wish you the best.–Stew Webb
The Mizel brothers are devoted high-level Zionist agents who are national real estate moguls. They own a real estate company called Richmond American Homes. The Mizel brothers are deeply connected to the Silverado Savings and Loan scam and other Zionist financial crimes of our time. Federal whistle blower Stewart Webb, who was married to Kerre Millman, a family member of the Mizel gang, has done a great deal in researching and exposing this criminal network.
The Zionist Gang Behind New York’s 9-11 Conference
Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. – Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832)
History is not history unless it is the truth. – Abraham Lincoln
History, facts and truth are all Divine Products, and must prevail. – Charles A. Briggs
By Christopher Bollyn
Lenny Charles Labanco is the executive producer of the conference “How the World Changed After 9/11” that was held in New York City on September 11-12. Labanco is the owner of the tax exempt “charitable” organization doing business as INN World Report Inc. Lenny, who is married to a Brazilian Jew, was unwilling to discuss the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the terrorism of 9/11 during his two-day conference at Tribeca’s Walker Stage. To understand why the evidence of Israeli/Zionist involvement was not on the agenda, one need only look behind the scenes to see the super-Zionists and Orthodox Jews who own and control the Walker Stage — and Leonard Charles Labanco’sI.N.N. World News, a tax exempt non-profit television station.
The World Trade Center was pulverized using an extremely powerful explosive known as super-thermite, a nanocomposite that was applied as a coating on the interior surfaces of the Twin Towers. Who put the super-thermite in the Twin Towers? It certainly was not Muslim terrorists — but the terror atrocity was designed to be blamed on Muslims by the Zionist-controlled media and government in order to kick-start a pre-planned U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq in order to steal the region’s immense mineral wealth.
The Enron financial fraud and the plundering of Iraqi oil wealth are just two of the mega-crimes related to 9-11. The false-flag terror of 9-11 is just one manifestation of the Zionist criminal network that controls and corrupts the U.S. government.
The Zionist criminal agenda to occupy and plunder Afghanistan and the Middle East is well known to the more politically astute 9-11 relatives, as can be seen from this relative’s sign at the U.S. Capitol in June 2002. This is the real reason why Alvin K. Hellerstein, the Zionist judge controlling the 9-11 tort litigation, has blocked a trial for the relatives for 9 years by forcing all of them to settle out of court. This is a most appalling travesty of justice but exactly how the Zionist-controlled judicial system works against the victims of 9-11 – and protects the Zionist terrorists behind the crime. [Photo – Christopher Bollyn]
When a supporter of Bollyn.com wrote to me recently about a 9-11 conference in Manhattan, I was interested in finding out more about the people behind the event. The reader wrote:
My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together. http://www.howtheworldchanged.org/
I was initially intrigued by the fact that Lenny Charles, the “executive producer” of “How the World Changed After 9/11” seemed to share the same last name as Dan Charles, the young Jew from Colorado who took over the erstwhile Reform Party shortly after Pat Buchanan’s presidential campaign in 2000. As a former delegate from Illinois for the Reform Party, I remember how Dan Charles ran desperately to obtain any position possible during the party’s national conference in Nashville. He was rejected for the top three positions and finally managed to be elected Treasurer of the party. From that position, Dan Charles soon took over control of America’s leading third party and renamed it the America First Party (AFP). Since Charles took control the party has been completely ineffective. To derail the movement appears to have been Charles’ mission.
Dan Charles of Colorado took over the Reform Party in 2001
WHO IS LEONARD CHARLES LABANCO?
Lenny Charles (who is really Leonard Charles Labanco) was a jazz guitarist living in Boulder, Colorado, in the 1980s whose name was Leonard Charles Labanco, Jr, originally from Westfield, New Jersey. Lenny Charles is Labanco’s stage name in which he uses his first and middle names, so Dan Charles and Lenny Charles are probably not related. In any case, my real interest was on the 9-11 conference, a two-day “symposium of critical thinkers” called “How the World Changed After 9/11” held on September 11-12, 2010, at the Walker Stage located at 56 Walker Street in the Tribeca area of Manhattan.
I called Lenny Charles to ask him about the 9-11 conference and his relationship with the WexTrust criminal scam, which evidently was connected to the building at 56 Walker Street where Lenny Charles’ I.N.N. World News network is based. In response to the reader’s original question, I posted the following comments in my Question and Answer section a few days ago:
I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News. Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist “War on Terror” and the invasion of Afghanistan. Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of “Who did it?” will not be delved into. The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph “Yossi” Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN’s 56 Walker St. building. Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media? Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda. That’s what controlled media means. Even the alternative media is controlled. Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)
Lenny Charles (right) of INN World Report being interviewed in 2009
Lenny Charles of INN is the front man for the mystery owner of 56 Walker Street. Who might that be and why is his identity kept secret? Given the fact that Lenny Charles Labanco is married to a Brazilian Jewish woman, it is probably Lenny Labanco using the name “LenBrazil” who is the real author of “The Lies of the Truth Movement”, the website where he posted an article entitled “Can William Rodriguez be believed?” Lenbrazil is also a 9/11 “debunker” who tries to say that the chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the World Trade Center are actually paint. Perhaps we are seeing a pattern of deception in Lenny Labanco’s 9-11 efforts? But why would he be doing this?
MY FIRST COMMENTS
I don’t know much about Lenny Charles. He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey. Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood. How does Lenny manage it? Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan. SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN? Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be. A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa. How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud?
Joseph Shereshevsky (left, son of the rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky of Brooklyn) a Norfolk resident and former COO of WexTrust Capital and Steven Byers, the company’s founder and CEO, were each hit with fraud and conspiracy charges. When he was arrested for his part in the $100 million pyramid scheme in August 2008, Shereshevsky held a one-way plane ticket to Israel. After they were busted, Byers made a $500 donation to Barack Obama on August 23, 2008. (Courtesy of www.vosizneias.com)
In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community. The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint. The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here. An interactive time line of the case is here.
THE ZIONIST CRIMINAL NETWORK BEHIND THE SCENES AT THE WALKER STAGE
As a nine-year veteran of 9-11 research, I have participated in many conferences and organized several by myself. I know that it takes a great deal of time and money to put on a conference. The events that I put on were free symposia held at the Schaumburg public library, where the conference hall was free of charge. Lenny’s conference, on the other hand, is not free and will be held in the Walker Stage, a nightclub in the high-rent Tribeca district of Manhattan. Lenny is the contact person/manager of Walker Stage at 56 Walker Street, but the property is owned by an outfit called Walker Street Associates, which is listed as a partnership in court papers with only one name given – Guy Morris.
I asked Lenny if Guy Morris was the owner of the building, and he confirmed that he was. But Morris is not the real owner. Lenny then wrote a nasty and threatening email to me, saying:
“The building is owned by 56 walker llc period, which is Mr. Morris alone.”
But that is clearly not what the records show, and the data doesn’t lie. The records indicate that 56 Walker LLC is a partnership and that Walker Street Associates is owner of the property. I wondered why court documents never named the other partner(s) of Walker Street Associates, whose identities were kept secret and listed as John Doe (1-10). Why has the real ownership of 56 Walker Street been kept such a secret? Why does the owner of Walker Street Associates hide his identity?
Job data from 2004 shows 56 Walker Street owned by Walker Street Associates
New York City “Job Work Record” documents for 2004 clearly indicate that Guy Morris is a listed owner of 56 Walker Street as a partner in Walker Street Associates (See Row 25, Especially Cells BK-BO in this spreadsheet). The SKG Music and Media company of Lenny Charles is also listed as SG, which probably stands for “Smiling Goat, Inc.” a television sound stage that records jazz acts at 56 Walker Street. Smiling Goat, whatever that might mean, is listed with the same phone number as Lenny’s nightclub, the Walker Sound Stage. Lenny wrote to me saying that 56 Walker Street is owned by Walker Street, LLC. Both Walker Street, LLC and Walker Street Associates have the same phone number and both have used Greenberg Traurig to lobby on behalf of the company. Walker Street LLC and Associates share the same phone number, (212) 925-4023, and address at 47 Walker Street as Menashe Grossman and Elihu Lipkis and his son Mordy, owners of the Shushana Company, a legally-challenged real estate company. Greenberg Traurig, it should be noted, is the high-power law firm behind getting George W. Bush into the White House after the fraudulent election of 2000.
When I asked Lenny who he thought was behind 9-11 he said that he would not speculate to provide an answer. I understood from his answer that his 9-11 conference will not address the key question, “Who did it?” Lenny’s response and the general lack of focus of his conference made complete sense when I found the mystery owner of Walker Street Associates.
THE ZIONIST MIZEL BROTHERS
As it turns out, the real owner, president, and general partner of Walker Street Associates is Steven M. Mizel of the Zionist Mizel family of Tulsa and Denver, Colorado. Business reports in the New York Times and court documents reveal that Mizel is the sole owner of the core business of Walker Street Associates. A SEC document from 1996 says: “Walker Street Investors, Inc. (the “Walker Street”), [is] a company wholly-owned by Steven M. Mizel.
The New York Times reported on November 29, 1988:
WASHINGTON, Nov. 28— Walker Street Associates L.P., an investment partnership, has acquired a 7.4 percent stake in National Intergroup Inc. and said it might propose a leveraged buyout of the Pittsburgh-based holding company, which has interests in steel, oil and pharmaceuticals.
In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Walker Street said it ”believes that the value of Intergroup’s assets exceeds the market value of the company’s common stock.” Walker Street is owned by Steven M. Mizel, executive vice president of MDC Holding Inc., a Denver-based real estate company. It bought its 1.6 million Intergroup common shares for an average price of $16.10. Intergroup has almost 21.7 million shares outstanding. Based on today’s closing price of $18 a share on the New York Stock Exchange, the company is worth about $390 million.
MDC HOLDINGS INC.
MDC stands for Mizel Development Corporation, which is headed by Steven’s brother Larry, who is founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Larry has also served on the national board of the Israeli lobby, AIPAC. Mizel has also founded a Jewish museum and a rather bizarre propaganda institute on terrorism in Denver.
Larry A. Mizel (right) is a devoted Zionist agent.
The Mizel brothers are devoted high-level Zionist agents who are national real estate moguls. They own a real estate company called Richmond American Homes. The Mizel brothers are deeply connected to the Silverado Savings and Loan scam and other Zionist financial crimes of our time. Federal whistle blower Stewart Webb, who was married to Kerre Millman, a family member of the Mizel gang, has done a great deal in researching and exposing this criminal network.
Larry’s daughter, Courtney Mizel Green, is the Founding Director and Chairman of The CELL, i.e. the Counterterrorism Education Learning Lab or the Center for Empowered Living and Learning, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization set up by her father Larry to propagandize the Denver public about terrorism through its permanent exhibit titled “Anyone, Anytime, Anywhere: Understanding the Threat of Terrorism”. As the daughter of an ardent Zionist, she should know all about terrorism – it was the primary tactic used by Zionists to establish the Rothschild’s “Jewish state” in Palestine. Is the 1946 bombing of the King David Hotel part of the Mizel exhibit on terrorism? How about the Zionist false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11?
The Mizel family’s Denver-based terror CELL uses televised images to spread its Zionist propaganda, very much like the controlled media in the United States.
The key point is that the devoted Zionist agent Steven M. Mizel is the owner and power behind the scenes at I.N.N. and the Walker Stage. Lenny Charles’ 9-11 conference is just another Zionist effort to hijack the memory of 9-11 by misinterpreting the false-flag terror atrocity that changed the world without asking who really did it or discussing the evidence of Israeli/Zionist involvement. By organizing a high-profile conference in Manhattan on the ninth anniversary of 9-11, Lenny and his Zionist criminal backers seek to hijack and control the discussion of 9-11, but all they have succeeded in doing is to expose the Zionist criminal network behind 9-11 in even greater relief and detail.
to be continued…
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Courtney Mizel Green at Michael Milken Institute, April 26, 2010
Note by Stew Webb: Spencer Brown died in Florida after resigning from MDC as the President of the Company. Brown testified in the Silverado Savings and Loan hearing with Neil Bush Director, MDC was the Parent Company of Silverado Savings and Loan. Brown represented MDC Holdings, Inc. (MDC-NYSE) as the President after Larry Mizel suddenly came down with a Brain Tumor so he did not have to testify in the Congressional Silverado Hearing this Federal Whistleblower helped make happen. After the hearings Larry Mizel’s Brian Tumor went away and he resumed his position as President of MDC Controlled by Denver Illuminati Zionist KingPin Leonard Millman, George HW Bush’s Organized Crime partner.
Neo-Bolshevik Think Tanks, Revolutionaries, and Organizations (Part I)
“Both the Bush and Obama administrations have given Israel everything it has wanted (except a green light to attack Iran), and U.S. politicians continue to bend over backward to express their deep devotion to the Jewish state.”—Professor Stephen M. Walt of Harvard
A working definition of “neo-Bolshevik think tanks and organizations” is any institute or organization that seeks to pursue perpetual wars in the Middle East either covertly or explicitly in the name of “counter-terrorism.” Moreover, this particular think tank or organization will implicitly elevate Israel above any other nation and sometimes above the law. This was quite clear when George W. Bush asked his father to define neoconservatism.
“‘What’s a neocon?’” he said. “‘Do you want names, or a description?’” answered the elder Bush. “‘Description.’ ‘Well,’ said the former president of the United States, ‘I’ll give it to you in one word: Israel.’”
In other words, every president of the United States has to answer to Israel with respect to the Middle East, even though no president seems to like being dictated by a foreign country.
Both former president Nicolas Sarkozy and president Obama for example knew very well that Netanyahu cannot be trusted. At one point, Sarkozy said to Obama, “I can’t stand him [Netanyahu]. He’s a liar.”
Obama responded, “You’re tired of him; what about me? I have to deal with him every day.” The media and both presidents, even though they got caught with their pants down denouncing Netanyahu as a liar, denied that they ever uttered those words.
Scholars such as Halper and Clarke note the same thing, arguing that for the neocons, there is “a keen interest in the affairs of Israel” and Benjamin Ginsberg confirms that a central focus of the neoconservatives is “their attachment to Israel.”
In other words, the capital of the United States is Washington, but Washington has to respond to a higher power with respect to the Middle East, and that higher power is Israel.
Here terms such as “republican” and “democrat” are made meaningless because both are used equally to further the neo-Bolshevik/neoconservative agenda.
For example, Jewish mogul George Soros used his money to campaign against George W. Bush’s run for president. Yet Soros later paid at least $150,000 “for lobbying work” to Randy Scheunemann, a Jewish neocon who was John Mc-Cain’s foreign policy adviser and later Sarah Palin’s aide. (And Scheunemann did not disappoint, because he did major underground based on Jewish interests rather than American interests.).
One common denominator between Bolshevism, Zionism and neoconservatism is that they all seek massive death in order to bring about their own version of heaven on earth. Millions upon millions of people had to die after the Bolshevik Revolution was over. Millions upon millions of people—including children—have to die in the Middle East in order to bring about this tikkum olam.
This became very clear way back in 1996 when Leslie Stahl of 60 Minutes asked Madeleine Albright the question, “We have heard that half a million children have died [from the sanction]. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?”
Without batting an eye, the neo-Bolshevik responded, “We think the price is worth it.” Later, Albright accused Stahl of propounding “Iraqi propaganda” and moved on to say that “I had fallen into a trap and said something I did not mean.”
Fallen into a trap? This was a serious question that demanded serious answers, and Albright thought it was a set up! Moreover, if Albright did not mean it, why didn’t she write an apology to the thousands upon thousands of Iraqi parents who have lost their children because of the sanction?
What is so sickening and disgusting is that Albright was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Barack Obama.
While the neo-Bolsheviks are still carrying their crimes all across the Middle East without a challenge, the Associated Press is worrying that 10 alleged Nazi war criminals are living in the U.S.!
In a nutshell, in the Jewish Century, torture and crimes against humanity have to be reinterpreted—and the best way to do so is to redefine those terms away. In a later interview, Albright contradicted herself by upholding two opposite and radical ideas. She declared that the war in Iraq was the greatest disaster in the history of America.
But when the interviewer asked, “Experience of the recent years have made people starting to describe the United States as an empire as opposed to the Republic its Founding Fathers intended it to be,” Albright unapologetically declared America “America is not an empire…It is not a country that wants to go out and dominate others.”
As Stephen Walt of Harvard wrote a few days ago,
“The United States invaded two Muslim countries — Afghanistan and then Iraq — even though the latter had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Each war then led to long and incompetently run occupations in which many local inhabitants died. The United States was not directly responsible for all these deaths, of course, and some of its acts in both countries were obviously intended to help local citizens.
“But overall, these actions merely reinforced the idea that the United States has an irresistible propensity to interfere in these societies, and often with military force. The war on terror also led to drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan, the abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, and an outpouring of Islamophobic rhetoric by certain U.S. pundits and politicians.
“And oh yes: The United States has also imposed increasingly stringent sanctions on Iran, which makes both Israel and the Saudi royal family happy but reinforces perceptions of a powerful but hypocritical America. In short, the past 12 years provide plenty of ammunition for anyone trying to argue that the United States remains intrinsically hostile to the Muslim world…
“The United States gave Israel diplomatic cover during the 2006 Lebanon War and the 2008-2009 Gaza War, and also following the attack on the Mavi Marmara in 2010. Obama caved completely on the issue of a settlement freeze, and the U.S. Congress continues to vote a generous aid package every year and demean itself with various AIPAC-drafted resolutions.”
How, then, can Albright maintain both contradictory statements at the same time and in the same respect while her head does not explode? The U.S. is not an empire but the U.S., through Israel’s orders, is policing virtually every country in the Middle East.
Neo-Bolshevik Think Tanks and Organizations
So what are some of those neo-Bolshevik think tanks and organizations?
Middle East Forum (MEF), headed by Daniel Pipes, is a quintessential example of neo-Bolshevism in action. We have already seen how Pipes has implicitly declared that the U.S. should support both Assad and the Syrian terrorists so that both entities would end up destroying themselves.
The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is another version of neo-Bolshevism. They were very vocal in promulgating the lie that Iraq had WMDs without a shred of evidence. Even after the war was a disaster, the AEI came up with a brilliant strategy of how to win the war.
In a 47-page paper entitled “Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq,” it is said that America had to send “25,000 additional troops to clear Baghdad house by house.” When people were a little skeptical about the strategy, Joe Lieberman declared, “The fact is that we are engaged against an axis of Islamist extremists and terrorists. It is an axis of evil.”
Previously, in 2003, George W. Bush gave a speech at the same institution declaring, “A liberated Ira can show the power of freedom to transform that vital region” precisely because Iraq would serve “as a dramatic and inspiring example…for other nations in the region.” A decade later, decent Jewish writers and scholars such as Fred Kaplan of Slate were talking about “the coming collapse of the Middle East.” A proper title could have been: “The Coming Collapse of the Middle East by the Neo-Bolsheviks.”
More neo-Bolshevik organizations: JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs); AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee); PNAC (Project for the New American Century); WINEP (Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy); ZOA (Zionist Organization of America).
One of the most vocal representatives for the idea of bombing Iran is Michael Ledeen, known for his book The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots’ Quest for Destruction. Ledeen is a former scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, where he worked with Richard Perle, known as the “Prince of Darkness.” For over twenty-five years Ledeen was actively involved in “the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs (JINSA), an activist group that promotes a strategic alliance between the United States and Israel.”
Central to Ledeen’s thesis in The Iranian Time Bomb is that Iran was responsible for September 11th. Not only that, Iran has always sought “to destroy or dominate” the United States! Moreover, for Ledeen, Iran is “the mother of modern terrorism.”
Ledeen believes the best way to destroy “the mother of modern terrorism” is through war. In fact, Ledeen has been a proponent of the idea that peace can come through violent war. He said,
“I don’t know of a case in history where peace has been accomplished in any way other than one side winning a war [and] imposing terms on the other side.”
Ledeen also maintains that Iran was the chief mine of terrorism, proven, says Ledeen, by court documents (even though he never tells where to find the court documents or what they actually said); in the same article, Ledeen even implied that the quicker the U.S. invaded Iran, the better.
By invading Iran, Ledeen argued, the U.S. would eventually bring down “the mullahcracy, for they will keep killing our people and our friends.” It is not surprising that Ledeen has been described as “one of the most dishonest and ludicrous jokes on the political scene.”
As the United States moved toward war against Iraq, Ledeen claimed that countries that did not fully support the United States were allying themselves with terrorism.
“The Franco-German strategy was based on using Arab and Islamic extremism and terrorism as the weapon of choice, and the United Nations as the straitjacket for blocking a decisive response from the United States,” Ledeen wrote, claiming that both France and Germany should be treated as “strategic enemies.”
Not only that, he further stated that both France and Germany had “struck a deal with radical Islam and with radical Arabs.” Although Ledeen admits that the theory “sounds fanciful, to be sure,” he was clear that if it happens to be correct,
“we will have to pursue the war against terror far beyond the boundaries of the Middle East, into the heart of Western Europe. And there, as in the Middle East, our greatest weapons are political: the demonstrated desire for freedom of the peoples of the countries that oppose us.”
In response to this, Jonah Goldberg proposed the “Leeden doctrine,” which simply is that “every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”
Once again we are back to perpetual wars, not only in the Middle East, but wherever neo-Bolsheviks like Ledeen want them. As Ledeen himself declared, the levels of casualties in the Iraq War are “secondary. It may sound like an odd thing to say. But all the great scholars who have studied American character have come to the conclusion that we are a warlike people and that we love war.”
Levels of casualties are “secondary” precisely because in the Jewish Century, casualties are some of the disasters that Gentiles have to endure. We are seeing the same results in other places. During the last six months, it has been reported that 1,319 civilian deaths have taken place in Afghanistan. Some 2,533 people have been injured. This has been growing at an astronomical rate. Torture has also been considered an essential fabric in Afghanistan.
Moreover, it has been reported that millions upon millions of Syrian refugees are without food and shelter due to the war in Syria. The UN was not even able to reach all of those people. But again this is a small price to pay. According to the neo-Bolshevik reading of things, Israel is worth that price.
This is not the first time Ledeen had turned to blatant fabrication in order to promote an ideology—he was one of the people who promoted the falsehood that Saddam Hussein had bought uranium in Niger. Ledeen later denied any involvement in the matter.
Neoconservatives such as Mark R. Levin have stood up for Ledeen, saying things like the “Left’s narrative” has produced a libelous accusation against Ledeen when he had nothing to do with the forgery.
Who’s paying the bill?
As I write, Detroit is virtually economically ruined. “Crimes have become so bad there,” one reported declared, that “police are telling people to enter at their own risks.” Recently, the San Francisco Chronicle declares, “Four out of 5 U.S. adults struggle with joblessness, near-poverty or reliance on welfare for at least parts of their lives, a sign of deteriorating economic security and an elusive American dream.”
As I write, Los Angeles, as president of California’s Reform Daniel Pellissler puts it, “is probably two to three years away from being in the same position that Detroit is where there is not enough money to pay the bills. [LA] can’t project, going forward, a stable budget because they face the same pension problems that everyone else in the country does.”
Some have predicted that other cities such as Newark, Oakland, Cleveland, will more than likely follow the disastrous fate of Detroit, unless a radical change takes place.
How can we change this disaster? Pellissler declares, “The only way that you can really deal with this is to change the promises that you’ve made to employees. We’re at the place in California where many of the cities in distress could ease their pension burden if they could just change the benefits that current employees earn in the future.”
In other words, precious Americans work their entire life to get a decent retirement, but they will be shocked to know that the money isn’t there—it has fallen on the blessed hands of the neo-Bolsheviks, who use it for perpetual wars.
There is more bad news on the horizon. A three-panel judge ordered Governor Jerry Brown of California to release nearly 10,000 inmates “because of a huge overcrowding problem in the California prison system.”
In nearly every country, if an alien commits a crime, he is out of that country. (This writer currently resides in South Korea and the immigration law is quite strict.) But in America, if aliens commit crimes, we put them to jail and now we are in the process of letting them go because “of a huge overcrowding problem.” Listen to this:
“When the United States incarcerates criminal aliens—noncitizens convicted of crimes while in this country legally or illegally–in federal and state prisons and local jails, the federal government bears much of the costs.
“It pays to incarcerate criminal aliens in federal prisons and reimburses state and local governments for a portion of their costs of incarcerating some, but not all, criminal aliens illegally in the country through the Department of Justice’s State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) managed by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).
“Some state and local governments have expressed concerns about the impact that criminal aliens have on already overcrowded prisons and jails and that the federal government reimburses them for only a portion of their costs of incarcerating criminal aliens.
“At the federal level, the number of criminal aliens incarcerated increased from about 42,000 at the end of calendar year 2001 to about 49,000 at the end of calendar year 2004–a 15 percent increase. The percentage of all federal prisoners who are criminal aliens has remained the same over the last 3 years–about 27 percent.
“The majority of criminal aliens incarcerated at the end of calendar year 2004 were identified as citizens of Mexico. We estimate the federal cost of incarcerating criminal aliens–Bureau of Prisons (BOP)’s cost to incarcerate criminals and reimbursements to state and local governments under SCAAP—totaled approximately $5.8 billion for calendar years 2001 through 2004.”
A spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation declared a few years ago that “These are foreign-born inmates. Or unlawfully present.” Some of the inmates are from various places around the world: Congo, Egypt, Afghanistan, Finland, El Salvador, and primarily Mexico.
How much does it cost the taxpayers? Almost a billion dollars a year! Senator Michael Rubio declared, “It’s too much money. It’s very difficult for people to conceive the size of the problem. We have a revolving door with respect to sending violent criminals to their countries, and then they just end up coming back to the U.S. and specifically California.”
The NSA Cannot Help Curb Drug Trafficking and Money Laundering
Once again, the NSA can spy on your girlfriend, your wife, your close friends, and can even detect whether you have a huge underwear, but they cannot protect the American people when it comes to criminal activity sneaking in the country! More recently, the New York Times itself blew everything out of proportion when it reported:
“Agencies working to curb drug trafficking, cyberattacks, money laundering, counterfeiting and even copyright infringement complain that their attempts to exploit the [NSA’s] vast resources have often been turned down because their own investigations are not considered a high enough priority, current and former government officials say….
“Privately, intelligence officials at the drug agency and elsewhere have complained that they feel shut out of the process by the N.S.A. and the F.B.I. from start to finish, with little input on what groups are targeted with surveillance and only sporadic access to the classified material that is ultimately collected.”
What the authors of the article implicitly are implicitly saying is that the NSA only exists to protect Israel, not Americans or America. The NSA’s job is to spy on you and others for the state of Israel. The only way that nearly all precious Americans have not yet revolted against the NSA is largely because we have already been bombarded by the idea that spying on Americans is good. Hollywood has already done a good job on this. The Dark Knight, the top grossing film in 2008, made this point very clear.
How do NSA officials respond?
“Intelligence officials say they have been careful to limit the use of the security agency’s troves of data and eavesdropping spyware for fear they could be misused in ways that violate Americans’ privacy rights.”
They spent more than a decade spying on Americans (and yes, they are still doing it), but they cannot help curb drug trafficking? Nonsense! But there is more to the picture than meets the eye and ear here:
“Sometimes, security agency and bureau officials accuse the smaller agencies of exaggerating links to national security threats in their own cases when pushing for access to the security agency’s surveillance capabilities. Officials from the other agencies say that if a link to national security is considered legitimate, the F.B.I. will at times simply take over the case itself and work it with the N.S.A.
“In one such case, the bureau took control of a Secret Service investigation after a hacker was linked to a foreign government, one law enforcement official said. Similarly, the bureau became more interested in investigating smuggled cigarettes as a means of financing terrorist groups AFTER the case was developed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.”
Who is really benefiting from this drug business? As we shall see in a moment, it is largely the neo-Bolsheviks.
The bigger picture here is that whether the issues revolve around drug trafficking or protecting our borders, decent Americans are paying the price. Rubio lamented, “We have to urge the Federal government to do a better job of protecting our borders.” Congressman Kevin McCarthy said something similar:
“There’s no question illegal immigration continues to be a large and costly problem in California and around the nation. The first and most important step to addressing this problem is securing our border. The federal government can and should do more to ensure our border is secure, including more physical barriers, border patrol and electronic surveillance.”
My response to Rubio and McCarthy is that the Federal government does not have money to protect our borders, since much of the money has already gone to perpetual wars, the NSA, and other Israeli-run businesses.
Even Chuck Norris, a Hollywood Zionist shill, had an ounce of common sense to say that we need to “deport California’s illegal immigrant prisoners.” What Norris does not know or does not want to tell his readers is that this was a largely Jewish movement, an issue that will come up in another article.
While every fabric of the social and economic pillars seem to be crumbling, neo-Bolsheviks like Evelyn Gordon of Commentary keeps telling us that “There’s no more time to waste on Iran”! Gordon, who has been living in Israel since 1987, concludes her article by saying, “either military action is taken in the coming months, or a nuclear Iran will be inevitable. There is no more time to waste.”
Joshua Muravchik of the American Enterprise Institute wrote in the LA Times way back in 2006 that “Diplomacy is doing nothing to stop the Iranian nuclear threat; a show of force is the only answer.” The first sentence that muravchik wrote in his article can hardly be missed: “WE MUST bomb Iran.” Just a few days ago, Graham Allison of the Atlantic reported:
“That Iran’s nuclear challenge poses the most urgent threat to peace and security today is widely agreed across the national security community, and many argue that 2013 will be the decisive year for this issue. As former Mossad head Ephraim Halevy notes, Israel ‘has long believed that mid-2013 would be an hour of decision in its dealings with Iran.’”
Allison continued to say, “I am prepared to bet $51 of my money against $49 of those who want to bet that by December 31, 2013, Iran will either have a nuclear weapon or have been the target of a major bombing attack.”
I will propose a better offer. Based on Israel’s history of lying to the West about Iran and based on the U.S. intelligence community, I will bet five thousand dollars that Iran will not get the bomb in 2013.
Neo-Bolsheviks are getting paid from drug trafficking
Richard Perle, known as the “Prince of Darkness”
The bigger picture again is this: who in his right mind would want to pursue perpetual wars except neo-Trotskyites and neo-Bolsheviks who work for Israel and other foreign countries? Former CIA official Philip Giraldi writes,
“Richard Perle and Doug Feith in particular benefited financially from their ties to defense industries in Israel while also serving as richly rewarded ‘consultants’ for Turkish interests. Feith’s International Advisors Inc., a registered agent for Turkey in 1989-1994, was paid $600,000 a year by Turkish sources, while Richard Perle received $48,000 annually as a consultant.
“Feith has also long been associated with Northrop Grumman sales in the Middle East. While at the Pentagon in 1983, Perle was criticized for endorsing the U.S. Army’s purchase of an armaments system from an Israeli company that had paid him $50,000 in consulting fees one year before…
“In Sibel Edmonds’s day, the Turks and Israelis were under investigation by the FBI because U.S.-made weapons incorporating restricted technologies were appearing in a number of countries not authorized to receive them, many of which were located in Central and South Asia as well as in Latin America. The weapons have also wound up in the hands of criminal cartels and narcotics traffickers, mingling arms sales with large-scale fraud, extortion, and drugs.
“While Turkish interests are largely confined to the Near East and adjacent areas in Europe, the Israelis operate worldwide. Israeli arms dealers, security services, and consultants span the globe. They dominate the airport security industry and have also been linked to training, equipping, and intelligence-gathering for corrupt and dictatorial regimes in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Security companies sometimes work as stringers for Israeli intelligence and may have ties to criminal groups including burgeoning Russian-Israeli organized crime in the United States.”
Moreover, what country would attack another country without even paying attention to international law? Israel has attacked Syria at least four times over the past few months. Israel, according to the New York Times, plans further attack on Syria!
It becomes quite obvious that Israel, “the problem child,” to use Harry Truman’s own words, needs to be sanctioned. That “problem child” gives us problems in the Middle East, which indirectly gave us Guantanamo, where it costs the American people “a whopping $2.7 million per prisoner.” Keep in mind that Guantanamo has been in operation since 2002.
“Do the math: 166 prisoners, $454 million. We are spending $2.7 million per year for each detainee held at Guantánamo Bay. What does it cost to put a prisoner and keep them in the safest and most secure prison in America in Florence, Colo.? $78,000 a year against $2.7 million that we’re spending in Guantánamo.”
Neo-Bolshevism will suck the West and much of the world dry
E. Michael Jones recently likens New York City to “a huge vacuum cleaner, sucking labor from every part of the United States and every part of the world. New York City is also a huge juicing machine. Like a juicing machine, it sucks the labor out of those who go there looking for work and then spits out the human pulp that is left over when the labor has been extracted…In a capitalist economy, the man with the most money gets the most fruit. Human labor lines up at the portals of New York City to be juiced.”
One of the victims of this juicy factory was a woman who happened to be a lawyer. She has been “unhappy for 10 years now,” she told her friend.
Stew Webb Radio Network Store
President Donald Trump, Drain the Swamp and Lock them Up Sir.
Stew Webb Whistle blower Grand Jury Demand Still Active against Hillary Clinton aka “HildaBeast”.
Bush, Obama, Clinton Founders of ISIS, ISIL, See Obama Video July 2015
George W. Bush Faces War Crimes December 12 2016 In U.S. Federal Court
(C) Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) Organized Crime Boss Hog Larry Mizel
911 World Trade Center Bush Guilty
Spot Dog is on the loose he loves to eat Illuminati, Zionist, Satanists and Lying Media Political Whores.
Stew Webb 32 Years a Federal Whistle blower
Stew Webb served in the United States Marine Corps and was Honorable Discharge. Stew was a General Contractor-Home Builder until 3 car crashes in one year and is now disabled. Stew turned Federal Whistle blower-Activist of 31 years and has been a guest on over 3,000 Radio and TV Programs since September 18, 1991 and now has his own Radio and TV Network http://www.stewwebbradionetwork.com Stew was responsible for the Congressional Investigations and hearings that lead to the Appointment of Independent Prosecutor Arlin Adams in the 1989 HUD Hearings, the Silverado Savings and Loan Hearings, the Denver International Airport Frauds hearings, the MDC Holdings, Inc. (MDC-NYSE) Illegal Political Campaign Money Laundering Colorado’s biggest case aka Keating 5 hearings and the information provided that lead to the 2008 Illegal Bank Bailout.
Stew was held as a Political Prisoner from 1992-1993 to silence his exposure by Leonard Millman his former in law with illegal charges of threatening harassing telephone calls charges which were dismissed with prejudice. Leonard Millman, George HW Bush, George W Bush, Jeb Bush, Neil Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Larry Mizel, Phil Winn, Norman Brownstein, John McCain and Mitt Romney to name a few are all partners in what is known as the Bush-Millman-Clinton Organized Crime Syndicate. Leonard Millman (Deceased 2004) was member of the "Illuminati Council of 13".
The below picture of the attempted murder of Stew Webb October 25, 2010 by two of Hillary Clinton’s Assassins. There were two more crashed and attempts one year later.
Contributions are much appreciated Thank You.– Stew Webb
Fair Use Notice
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.