Anti-Israel Sites Threatened by BlueStar College Fellows Program.
Sites lash out to shame and defame pro-Israel student leaders.
[ Editors Note: A righteous Jew forwarded this along because they knew we just love little gems like this, a peek behind the Jewish Wizard of Oz to see how they do their Voodoo. This is a classic. Catch the not too shy attitude about asking for money. And yes, I disabled the links just in case the Mossad has a subliminal message here that our senors missed. These folks just love the victim routine, that is playing victim while they are manufacturing real ones…Jim W. Dean ]
The BlueStar College Fellows leadership program has caught the attention of the Israel haters.
Their aggressive, abusive and assertion-laden coverage shows the kind of diatribes our students are facing on campuses and beyond.
BlueStar created our college program to help train student leaders to counter exactly this kind of bullying and bias from here and here.
The other side is clearly threatened by what we are accomplishing in our program. Now, it is up to you to help us continue our efforts to educate the next generation of Israel leaders and advocates. New student leaders are waiting for us to secure the funding to admit them to our leadership program.
The Mondoweiss author, who recently graduated from UC Santa Cruz where she was a leader in the Students for Justice in Palestine campus movement, was NOT on our trip, did NOT interview anyone on our trip, took participant blog quotes out of context, made broad, unsupported generalizations, and even made up “facts” about funders, program philosophy and trip activities to support her biased allegations against BlueStar’s program.
Students and board agree: Our student participants, who are puzzled by the inaccurate accounts of their trip, agree with BlueStar’s board of directors: official responses to close-minded sites like these are a waste of time. Time and energy are better spent telling the true story of Israel to the far more numerous people who can become our friends.
So, while we will use these articles as educational lessons to strengthen our students’ skills and knowledge on how to respond to bullying and media bias both on campus and beyond, BlueStar does NOT encourage you to respond to these sites.
What you should know about BlueStar College Fellows:
During the trip, participants see evidence of Israel’s diversity and values, the Jewish people’s right to self-determination and historical attachment to the land and just dealings with its neighbors despite legitimate security concerns. Our goal is to use the frame of journalism to help students develop the knowledge they need to have a more nuanced understanding of Israel, at a minimum.
Participants examine Israel’s affirmative case in its conflict with its neighbors. We reject black-and-white points of view, especially on difficult issues on land and security about which Israelis continue to debate.
Our program goal is not to dehumanize Palestinians, but rather to let participants examine the evidence against specious Palestinian claims that “Israel is an apartheid, illegal state built on land stolen from indigenous Palestinians and given to European Jews as a payoff for the Holocaust.”
[ Editors Note: Dear Folks, I did not edit the above as a practical joke. This is what really was in the email. I just wanted to make clear that I have only done the layout editing, but not changed any text! ]
Our struggle against anti-Israel forces is not over.
BlueStar is working full force to grow our college program this academic year. We need your help to reach even more Jewish and non-Jewish campus leaders in our struggle against anti-Israel actions on campus and beyond.
Premillennialist George Eldon Ladd says, “The basic watershed between a dispensational and a nondispensational theology” is that dispensationalism “forms its eschatology by a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and then fits the New Testament into it. A nondispensational eschatology forms its theology from the explicit teaching of the New Testament.”
For a dispensationalist or a Judaizer, many of the teachings in the Old Testament must take precedence over the teachings in New Testament—and sometimes even the teachings of Christ.
Moreover, Judaizers tend to invoke passages in the Old Testament in order to further their political and ideological ends. This has been one of the central issues among evangelical politicians.
In 2010, former presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, who has long been a supporter of Israel, made the pronouncement on the eve of her political stardom that America would cease to exist if it stops supporting Israel. She said:
“I am convinced in my heart and in my mind that if the United States fails to stand with Israel, that is the end of the United States. We have to show that we are inextricably entwined, that as a nation we have been blessed because of our relationship with Israel, and if we reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play.
“And my husband and I are both Christians, and we believe very strongly the verse from Genesis [Genesis 12:3], we believe very strongly that nations also receive blessings as they bless Israel. It is a strong and beautiful principle.”
We will not go into extensive theological exegesis here. We shall do so later in subsequent articles. But for Bachmann and others, this issue discussed in Genesis still applies to modern Israel, even though many Protestant writers have shown that God fulfilled those promises during the time of Joshua. Scripture also makes it plain that all the nations have been blessed because of Jesus Christ, who is the seed of Abraham.
“For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
“Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, and in thy seed shall all the kindred of the earth be blessed. Unto you first, God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities” (Acts 3:22-26).
This is completely antithetical to the Christian Zionist movement, which to a large extent elevates geopolitical Israel above anything else, including the church. One of the leading dispensationalists to espouse such a view is Herman Hoyt, who declared that in the dispensationalist millennium, the living Israel “will be the head over all the nations of the earth” and “on the lowest level there are the saved, living, Gentile nations.”
This view has been stated in many ways by other leading dispensationalist writers, including Charles C. Ryrie, J. Dwight Pentecost, H. Wayne House, Thomas D. Ice, John F. Walvoord, Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, Hal Lindsey, and even the late Dave Hunt.
Hunt goes so far as to say that “national Israel [will be] restored to its place of supremacy over the nations.” For dispensationalists, geopolitical Israel is one of the keys to the millennium. Pentecost states, “The Gentiles will be Israel’s servants” during that era. For Fruchtenbaum, “In the millennium Israel as a nation will rule over the Gentiles.”
The only way dispensational premillennialists are able to solve this theological numbo-jumbo is to propose that God has two distinct plans: one for the church and one for the nation of Israel. Charles C. Ryrie put it this way:
“A dispensationalist keeps Israel and the church distinct.”
Quoting another authority, Ryrie declares that “the basic premise of Dispensationalism is two purposes God expressed in the formation of two peoples who maintain their distinction throughout eternity.”
This view was articulated by other leading dispensationalists such as Lewis Sperry Chafer, and this thesis has played a major role in the writings of people like John Nelson Darby and C. I. Scofield.
By the time we reach the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, Dispensational Premillennialism had already been politicized, with presidents such as Ronald Reagan and beyond politically endorsing the movement. Charles Colson, a former Nixon advisor, had a cohort of friends in the White House who would lecture U.S. officials about prophecies in the book of Ezekiel and who would telephone “premillennialist faculty members at ‘Mid-South Seminary.”
Ronald Reagan was also a product of Hal Lindsey’s The Late Great Planet Earth and other apocalyptic frenzies. Reagan told Christian Life magazine back in 1968, “Apparently never in history have so many of the prophecies come true in such a relatively short time.”
Historian Paul Boyer declared that “The Late Great Planet Earth strengthened Reagan’s prophecy belief, and at a 1971 political dinner in Sacramento shortly after leftist coup in Libya, Reagan observer soberly:
‘That’s the sign that the day of Armageddon isn’t far off…Everything is falling into place. It can’t be too long. Ezekiel says that fire and brimstone will be rained upon the enemies of God’s people. That must mean that they’ll be destroyed by nuclear weapons.’”
Reagan also said, “You know, I turn back to your ancient prophets in the Old Testament and the signs foretelling Armageddon, and I find myself wondering if we’re the generation that’s going to see that come about. I don’t know if you’ve noted any of those prophecies lately, but believe me, they certainly describe the times we’re going through.”
Former president George W. Bush tried to convince France’s then president Jacques Chirac that “biblical prophecies were being fulfilled” and specifically that “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East,” but Chirac decided that “France was not going to fight a war based on an American president’s interpretation of the Bible.”
Like the dispensationalist camps, when the Gog and Magog apocalypse failed Bush, he turned to Baghdad as the forces of evil. As we shall see, all of this is completely compatible with the Judaizing movement which got its inception in the fifteenth century.
John Milton Was a Judaizer
A somewhat classic example of invoking the Old Testament to further ideological purposes is found in the life of John Milton, famed seventeenth-century English poet known for writing Paradise Lost.
Milton wanted to divorce his wife, but there was clear teaching about divorce in the New Testament. Christ taught that one ought not to divorce unless one partner has committed fornication (Matthew 5:32). Milton solved that problem by appealing to Moses and rejecting Christ’s teachings! To Milton,
“Our savior’s words touching divorce are, as it were, congealed into a stony rigour, inconsistent both with his doctrine and his office.”
As we shall see in subsequent articles, this form of eisegesis is consistent with many Protestant writers long before Milton came on the scene. Martin Luther for example wanted to burn the book of James because James did line up with Luther’s sola fide. And John Calvin was exegetically shown to be a Judaizer on many aspects.
Milton later said,
“Yea, God himself commands in his law more than once, and by his prophet Malachi, as Calvin and the best translations read that ‘he who hates, let him divorce—that is, he who hates cannot love. Hence it is that the rabbins, and Maimonides…tells us that ‘divorce was permitted by Moses to preserve peace in marriage and quiet in the family.’”
Milton’s reliance on rabbis such as Maimonides had nothing to do with the teachings of Christ, but rather with his own desire for divorce. He later published his own tract entitled The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, in which he essentially pleaded with England to allow divorce in society based on the teachings of the Old Testament and “some of the best among reformed writers.”
Yet Milton completely missed Moses’ point for sanctioning divorce in the Old Testament. As E. Michael Jones puts it,
“Milton again needs to contradict Christ and scripture, because Christ said ‘in the beginning it was not so,’ meaning that divorce was something added after the fall because Moses had to deal with the hardness of his people’s hearts.”
The temptation to reject the plain teachings of Christ—and the message of things like love, truth, dignity, love for one’s neighbor, and protection the innocent—and to embrace some of the Old Testament laws that were fulfilled or nullified by the coming of Jesus Christ did not start or die out in the seventeenth century. In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries many heretical movements drew their conclusions from the Old Testament.
Our time is no exception. For example, Sarah Palin frequently invoked passages in the Old Testament to pursue her political ends. Michelle Bachmann did the same thing in 2011. When Bachmann was obviously outmatched and losing support in Iowa, she didn’t invoke Christ or figures in the New Testament, but turned to Old Testament figures.
The simple fact is that many politicians—most specifically Christian Judaizers—have over the centuries appealed to the Old Testament in order to marshal their ideological purposes.
Take for example the Hussite revolution (which began in 1419), which used Moses and the nullified laws of the Old Testament, with respect to killing and pillaging enemies, as justification. There were indeed theological disputations around that time, and theological disputations got into politics, and politics got into a bloody war.
The selling of indulgences was one of the doctrines that caught the spirit of that era. Luther rose up and challenged that idea. But Luther did not stop there. Luther clung to the sword as portrayed in the Old Testament. Luther used language like the Old Testament, language which can be found throughout his denunciation of the pope.
“Hearest thou this, O pope,” he wrote in 1520, “not most holy, but most sinful? O that God from heaven would soon destroy thy throne and sink it in the abyss of hell!…O Christ, my Lord, look down, let the day of thy judgment break, and destroy the devil’s nest at Rome.” Luther sounded like James and John in the New Testament:
“And it came to pass, when the time was come that he [Jesus] should be received up, he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem. And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him. And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.
“And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them (Luke 9:52-54).
The Hussites solved problems such as indulgences by not only appealing to Moses in bearing swords and marching to crush their enemies, but also by leading mobs into churches and smearing excrement on crucifixes.
Historian Howard Kaminsky declares that Huss did not decide to start the violent revolution and the radical Hussites did not draw their radical movement which led to violent acts against monks in particular from Huss himself. There might be a glimpse of truth in this. But Huss’ heavy reliance on the Old Testament makes his doctrine ambiguous. He said:
“The time has come for us, just as it did for Moses in the Old Testament, to take up our swords and defend the law of God.”
The obvious question is why didn’t Huss appeal to Christ, the humble servant and the model for all Christians? Why didn’t Huss appeal to passages such as Matthew 5:43-48, which implicitly forbids serious followers of Christ to take up arms against enemies, most specifically when it comes to theological disputes?
As Jones rightly argues, whether Huss liked it or not, his statement here was an obvious appeal to the Old Testament, which Huss’s followers took to a radical height. Moreover, it makes the Protestant motto sola scriptura meaningless, because if Scripture is going to be interpreted in light of the wars and pillaging of Old Testament and not in light of Christ’s teachings, then we are in deep trouble.
Historians agree that this posed a problem for the Reformers. Even Erasmus saw that Judaica expositio—a literal interpretation of many of the Old Testament principles, such as eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth, with little regard for the teachings of the New Testament—could be a problem for the Judaizers.
Erasmus was proved right, for we know that “the philological works most frequently consulted by Christian Hebraists (such as Reuchlin’s De rudimentibus) were actually written by Jews. In addition, several important exegetical works of the early Reformation period—such as Bucer’s commentary on the Psalter (1529)—drew heavily upon medieval rabbinical sources, such as David Kimhi and Abraham Ibn Ezra and Solomon ben Isaac (Rashi) of Troyes.”
Will Durant writes that “Luther’s conception of God was Judaic. He could speak with eloquence of the divine mercy and grace, but more basic in him was the old picture of God as the avenger, and therefore of Christ as the final judge.”
Before Luther, continues Durant, judaizing rarely happened in Western culture; after Luther, “the Judaic contribution triumphed over the Greek; the Prophets won against the Aristotle of the Scholastics and the Plato of the humanists…the Old Testament overshadowed the New; Yahweh darkened the face of Christ.”
This played an influential role in Luther’s writings and teachings. And this essential point has been overlooked by many Protestant writers after Luther and beyond.
It is therefore safe to say that many during the Protestant Reformation were Judaizers, though Zwingli, on a theoretical level, was probably not one of them. Yet on a practical level Zwingli was a Judaizer and was even accused of betraying the Protestant motto, sola scriptura.
A propaganda manifesto was written in 1412 which reads,
“And so, dear holy community in Bohemia, let us stand in battle line with our head, Master Huss, and our leader, Master Jerome; and whoever will be a Christian, let him turn to us. Let everyone gird on his sword, let brother not spare brother, nor father spare son, nor son father, nor neighbor spare neighbor…All should kill so that we can make our hands holy in the blood of the accursed ones, as Moses shows us in his books; for what is written there is an example to us.”
Will Durant declared, “On July 30, 1419, a Hussite crowd paraded into New Town, forced its way into the council chamber, and threw councilors out of the windows into the street, where another crowd finished them off. A popular assembly was organized, which elected Hussite councilors.”
Pope Martin V organized a crusade against the Hussites, with king Sigismund approving it. The Hussites struck back by organizing their own army with Jan Zizka as the leader, “a sixty-year-old knight with one eye, who trained them, and led them to incredible victories.”
Zizka defeated Sigismund, then began to espouse the view that there should be no religious dissent. As a consequence of this worldview, his army
“passed up and down Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia like a devastating storm, pillaging monasteries, massacring monks, and compelling the population to accept the Four Articles of Prague. The Germans in Bohemia, who wished to remain Catholic, became the favorite victims of Hussite arms.”
The Four Articles of Prague declared that one ought to have freedom to worhip, to give no secular power to the clergy, and to punish mortal sins, yet the Hussites in general violated those principles. In other words, the document was a smokescreen for the Hussites. (However, not all Hussites were revolutionaries. There were many who were peaceful, detested wars and hatred against enemies, and practiced a return to traditional, mere, Christianity.)
Martin Luther was an admirer of Huss and believed he should not have been burned at the stake. Later, Luther argued that “the German Church should be reconciled with the Hussites of Bohemia.”
It should be made clear at the outset that there were several problems with the Reformation, but the issues were not as black and white as some historians have argued.
Calvin for example was responsible for the death of Michael Servetus, a Spanish physician who, upon reading rabbinical criticism of Christianity, no longer thought that the Trinity was valid. Servetus propounded heretical views in believing that Jesus was not co-equal with the Father, and that God the Father had to breath the Logos into Jesus. These views, among others, certainly made him a heretic, and he was disliked by both Catholics and Protestants.
After writing Christianismi Restitutio in 1546, in which he denounced the idea that God had predestined some to hell and others to heaven, Servetus sent the manuscript to Calvin. Calvin returned the favor by sending Servetus a copy of his Institutes of the Christian Religion. The die was cast.
Servetus sent Institutes back to Calvin with insulting comments because he thought Calvin was making elementary errors. Servetus made the point that it was irrational for God to send some to hell irrespective of whether they want to accept him or not and then condemn those same people for not accepting him. Calvin himself wrote in his Institutes:
“By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which He determined with Himself whatever He wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of those ends, we say that he has been predestined to life or death.”
In other words, freewill and predestination, in the Calvinist reading of things, are mutually exclusive. Moreover, those who are predestined to death are rebel sinners and therefore deserve God’s wrath! For example, you blindfold a person and then tell him to choose either right or left. And when he doesn’t choose what you want, you strike him dead. How is that logical?
Well, in the Calvinist reading of things, this is called compatibilism. It is the metaphysical idea that people are responsible and even blamed for their actions even though they cannot possibly do otherwise, even though it was God’s intention and decree that they fall into temptation and therefore be condemned!
These are essential in Calvin’s doctrine of predestination, and this is the doctrine that has been repudiated by many because it is pregnant with internal contradictions and because it makes God the author and the actual creator of sin. Listen to one Calvinist: God “can’t sin.” But two sentences later, the same author declares that God “created sin.” The Reformed author did not appeal to sola scriptura this time to propound that doctrine but appeals to the Westminster Confession in order to support his case.
By propounding this doctrine in his Institutes, Calvin made Servetus’ job easy.
Later Calvinists have found this doctrine repugnant and soon the essential doctrine of predestination as propounded by Calvin in his Institutes was “predestined” to split into five groups: five points, four points, three points, two points, and one point.
Servetus also implicitly made the point that if God condemns some for not responding to his gift of salvation, then the obvious conclusion is that God had given them the ability to respond to his calling. Modern Calvinists have struggled mightily to solve that contradiction.
Calvin, in return, wrote to one of his friends in 1546,
“Servetus has just sent me a long volume of his ravings. If I consent he will come here, but I will not give my word, for should he come, if my authority is of any avail, I will not suffer him to get out alive.”
By this time, Servetus was wanted by both Protestants and Catholics for heresy. He was arrested in Catholic lands, but barely escaped from prison and settled in Protestant Geneva, Calvin’s territory. On a Sunday, he went to church and was quickly recognized. Calvin quickly ordered his arrest.
During the trial, he was partially accused of having “in the person of M. Calvin, defamed the doctrines of the Gospel of the Church of Geneva.” On two occasions, Calvin appeared during the trial as Servetus’s accuser, though “the Protestant Council of Geneva asked the Catholic judges at Vienne for particulars of the charges that had been brought against Servetus.”
During the trial, Servetus literally begged for mercy, and two opponents of Calvin were summoned to save Servetus from burning at the stake. When the ministers declared that Servetus should be punished for his “utter lack of the spirit of meekness and docility,” he responded by saying, “You should show it toward me even though I were possessed of an evil spirit.”
Durant declared that the two opponents irritated Calvin even more than Servetus. Matteo Gribaldi, a professor of jurisprudence at Padua, called upon the people at the assembly to seriously reconsider the fraudulent civil punishment for religious opinions and matters. He was banished “on suspicion of Unitarianism.”
Gribaldi was later established as a professor of law at the University of Tubingen, but “Calvin sent word there of Gribaldi’s doubts; the university pressed him to sign a Trinitarian confession; instead he fled to Bern, where he died of the plague in 1564.”
Servetus moved on to write a reply to Calvin, in which he called Calvin “liar,” “impostor,” “hypocrite,” and “miserable wretch.” Calvin returned the favor by calling Servetus a “dirty dog” who “wiped his snout” and the “perfidious scamp.” Bainton declares that Servetus’s statement that Calvin was a “liar” was not entirely without merit. For example, Calvin, during the trial, accused Servetus of being unable to understand and read Greek, when in fact Servetus knew the language well.
Servetus was eventually condemned to be executed. Scared to death, Servetus begged Calvin to reconsider. Calvin declared that he would have a second thought if Servetus recanted from his heretical views. Servetus refused. He was eventually burned alive on October 27, 1553.
“When the executioner brought the fire before his face he gave such a shriek that all the people were horror-stricken. As he lingered, some threw on wood. In a fearful wail he cried, ‘O Jesus, Son of the Eternal God, have pity on me!’”
Many Protestant reformers were in agreement that Servetus deserved his punishment. Philip Melanchthon, a collaborator of Martin Luther, wrote a letter to Calvin and others giving “thanks to the Son of God” for the “punishment of this blasphemous man,” and declared that the burning was “a pious and memorable example to all posterity.”
Some Protestant scholars such as Alister McGrath have tried to downplay Calvin’s role in the execution, thereby giving the impression that Calvin had nothing to do with it. Yet the evidence against such a defense is found in Calvin’s own mouth.
McGrath declares that Calvin’s “tacit support for the capital penalty for offenses such as heresy which he (and his contemporaries) regarded as serious makes him a little more than a child of his age, rather than an outrageous exception to its standards…To single out Calvin for particular criticism, however, suggests a selectivity approaching victimization.”
McGrath says that Calvin’s involvement in the affair “was oblique.” Yet Calvin himself declared the opposite. McGrath continues, “The trial, condemnation and execution of Servetus were entirely the work of the city council, at a period in its history when it was particularly hostile to Calvin. The Perrinists had recently gained power, and were determined to weaken his position.”
Not so. Even other Protestant historians such as Roland H. Bainton agreed that the whole trial was orchestrated by John Calvin. Moreover, Calvin told us,
“And what crime was it of mine if our Council at my exhortation…took vengeance upon his execrable blasphemies?”
McGrath declares, “Calvin himself attempted to alter the mode of execution to the more humane beheading; he was ignored.” McGrath never tells us that it was Servetus who wanted “the more humane beheading,” to which Calvin agreed. The request was denied by the council, but Calvin had a hand in how Servetus was executed.
Calvin himself wrote a letter to the King of Navarre years later when he was still receiving criticism for his involvement in the execution, saying,
“Do not fail to rid the country of those zealous scoundrels who stir up the people to revolt against us. Such monsters should be exterminated, as I have exterminated Michael Servetus the Spaniard.”
In a rather sophisticated way of downplaying Calvin’s influence in the affair, McGrath declares, “Every major Christian body which traces its history back to the sixteenth century has blood liberally scattered over its credentials. Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Reformed and Anglican: all have condemned and executed their Servetuses, whether directly, or—as in the case of Calvin himself—indirectly.”
Calvin received widespread criticism for his act, prompting him in 1554 to write Defensio Orthodoxae Fidei de Sacra Trinitate Contra Prodigiosos Errores Michaelis Serveti, in which he quoted passages in the Old Testament such as Deuteronomy 13:5-15, 17:2, Exodus 22:20, and Leviticus 24:16 to buttress his defense of burning heretics.
“Whoever shall maintain that wrong is done to heretics and blasphemers in punishing them makes himself an accomplice in their crime…Wherefore does He [God] demand of us so extreme severity if not to show us that due honor is not paid Him so long as we set not His service above every human consideration, so that we spare not kin nor blood of any, and forget all humanity when the matter is to combat for his glory?”
By this time Calvin was already a Judaizer in applying Old Testament law to heretics. Even Durant wrote, “Whereas in general [Calvin] accepted St. Paul as his guide, he refused to use the Pauline expedient of declaring the old law superseded by the new.”
E. Michael Jones agrees with Louis Israel Newman that Calvin knew the consequences of not burning Servetus, that he was soon going to be accused of Judaizing. Diarmaid MacCulloch declares that for political reasons, Calvin wanted to prove to his enemies that he was not weak.
But by burning Servetus, Calvin implicitly ended up Judaizing anyway. This was so clear that Calvin almost applied the same Old Testament law to a close friend of his, Sebastian Castellio.
Castellio was born in France in 1515 and became erudite in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and was a Greek teacher at Lyons. He also lived with Calvin for a while and, in 1541, Calvin appointed him as rector of the Latin School at Geneva.
In time, Castellio parted company with Calvin on the doctrine of predestination and accused Calvin of intolerance, among other things, though he still admired Calvin as a friend.
Unlike Servetus, who told Calvin that Simon Magus was the real father of the doctrine of predestination, Castellio never castigated Calvin as a liar. Calvin again summoned the Council and accused Castellio. He was banished and for nine years lived in abject poverty, “supporting a large family, and working at night on his version of the Scriptures. He finished this in 1551.”
Castellio finally got to teach Greek again at the University of Basel, and was completely shocked that Calvin was the main culprit behind the execution of Servetus. Years later, Castellio produced Haereticis an Sint Persequendi (Should Heretics Be Persecuted?), in which he implied that Christ would not have burned anyone alive for being a heretic.
In order to make a rational and exegetical case, Castellio appealed to the New Testament and declared that the Old Testament laws with respect to burning heretics were out-dated.
Not withstanding the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution which declares that Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion and prohibits the establishment of a national religion, the Christian Brotherhood of America is in every establishment: the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, Home Land Security, CIA, among many of the different departments of the US government.
Although the Constitution does not support the establishment of faith-based parties, faith runs deep in the American political party system.
Republicans, due to their alliances with Evangelicals (Christians and Zionists), are deemed the party of political Christianity.
Though Thomas Jefferson was quite concerned, and rightly so, of leaving the door open to faith in public life, his clause was intended to “ erect a wall of separation between church and state.”
Political Christianity, or what I would refer to as the state of Christian Brotherhood in America, permeates in countless policy debates. This includes restrictions on abortion (even in cases of rape and incest), stem cell research and use, same-sex marriage, welfare and welfare reform, access to birth control, and even foreign aid to Africa. There are attempts to censor media that is deemed to promote “anti-family values,” and members of Congress who are “scored” on how much they enforce a traditional vision of family life.
Though members of Congress and state legislatures are forbidden to cross the line of separation between church and state, no legislation or Constitution can forbid legislators from voting with their “value system” or introducing legislation that stems from their value systems. It is only natural and expected.
Ronald Reagan and later George W. Bush were the first to recognize the power of the Christian Brotherhood when they made the Moral Majority (coined by Jewish Paul Weyrich) of the late Jerry Faldwell a corner stone of their political agenda. Later on, George W. Bush set up the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnership back in January 2001 with President Bush defining it as “Compassionate Conservatism, with more than $2.2 billion in awards to social services associated with religion.”
President Barack Obama kept the faith with such policies though renaming the office to “The White House Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives” back in February 2009, with membership ranging from Church of God in Christ, the National Council of Churches, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, African Methodists Episcopal Church, the Southern Baptist Convention, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, to the Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism.
The backbone of the Christian Brotherhood is in organizations such as the Southern Baptists Convention, Pat Robertson’s Christian Coalition of America, National Association of Evangelicals, United Methodist Church, Southern Baptist Convention, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America.
Although U.S. tax laws prohibit churches from endorsing candidates, they are allowed to influence legislation through lobbies, the media, and an army of campaigners in support of certain political candidates. Religious institutions such as religious orders, churches, mosques and synagogues, which in some cases are large enough to be owners of billions of millions of dollars worth of real estate properties and financial assets, are given tax breaks.
That kind of financial power does make a difference in politics in America. This has most clearly been seen in cross-country efforts to restrict access to abortion and to overturn Roe vs. Wade.
Unfortunately, a number of these same groups conduct fear-mongering, Islamaphobic campaigns that promote the idea that Muslims in the U.S. are here to impose Sharia Law, as if Sharia Law is an imminent danger to the U.S. and Christian way of life. Since November 2010, two-dozen states have considered legislation to ban the implementation of Sharia law, including Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina. Given that predominantly Muslim countries are rejecting the imposition of Sharia Law, it seems ridiculous to believe that Sharia Law is ever going to be imposed on Oklahomans.
These groups fail to recognize the irony that they are waging anti-Islam campaigns while at the same time, actively trying to pass legislation at both the State and Federal levels to impose their faith on everyone else.
The motivations behind such campaigns is not for the love of America or leading a Christian life, it is to use a fear of Islam in the U.S. as a way to promote Israel. “Scholars” like David Yerushalmi, who enjoys wide support from Republicans, are able to hold conferences in the U.S. Capitol Building on reports titled “Sharia: The Threat to America.” Major political figures with the Republic Party such as Newt Gingrich, have called Sharia Law a “mortal threat,” and called for it to be banned across America.
We all should remember the U.S. war on Iraq, with Evangelical chaplains having found to pump troops up with hate speech, leading U.S. troops in Samara, Iraq to drive around town with a Bradley Fighting Vehicle with “Jesus Killed Mohamed” emblazed all over it.
The US military top brass ignored members of the military framing what the U.S. was doing in Iraq and across the Middle East as a war on Islamic, or a modern-day version of the Crusades. Colonel Gary Hensley, division chaplain of the 101st Airborne and chief chaplain for all of Afghanistan, surrounded himself with Biblical posters translated into Pashto and Dar during a sermon at Bagram Air Force Base’s main chapel.
The Evangelical Christians Brotherhood targeted the military in order to set up a spear head from which they can “convert” the US government and the rest of the world, with organizations within the military such as Officers Christians Fellowship counting on 15,000 members and presence in 80% of US military installations, with Evangelicals reminding members that God comes before country.
With guys like Lt. Col. Mathew A. Dooley staff instructors at the Joint Forces Staff College concluding “ Using the lessons of Hiroshima: to wipe out whole cities at once targeting the civilian populations whenever necessary in a total war against Muslims”.
Billy Graham is considered to be a holy man, a man of God, is probably the best known Evangelist in the world today. He was an adviser to ten presidents, he has written 27 books, and is considered to be “world’s most influential Christian leader”. He was “the closest thing to a White House chaplain” and slept at the White House the night George HW Bush bombed Iraq. That ought to tell you something. He uplifted many but there is something very off with him, how can this “holy man” be involved with every President since WW2 who have waged dozen of wars? Maybe he didn’t get it right, maybe he was completely duped by the Zionists and became one of their tools. Billy Graham trusted God and will go down in history as a man who consoled Presidents during the mass murder of millions of innocent human beings.
The Reverend Billy Graham is a man possessed by God which actually means he is a man possessed by the memes of the Holy Bible. The Bible is a tribal war making document, God of Bible is commanding the Israelites to wage total war on their enemies, which is everyone not Jewish. Billy Graham’s Bible, The New King James version Psalm 137 (7-9) says:
7 Remember, O Lord, against the sons of Edom The day of Jerusalem, Who said, “Raze it, raze it, To its very foundation!”
8 O daughter of Babylon, who are to be destroyed, Happy the one who repays you as you have served us! 9 Happy the one who takes and dashes Your little ones against the rock!
There is a reason why Billy Graham supports mass murder and genocide against the Palestinians, he is a man of the Bible and the Bible is genocidal. Billy Graham is not good and not holy and maybe he is a monster. Shocked? Aghast? Have no fear, read on. Billy Graham is a textbook example of memetic possession and where it leads. Billy Graham is a backwoods hillbilly preacher who believes the Bible literally and thus is unable to reason properly, he is a perfect illustration of what is wrong with America. He represents the deep seated racist supremacism of Christian America and how it is used to wage war on brown skinned peoples all around the world.
Two Hambones Converge
How did Billy Graham get converted and become one of the most celebrated preachers of all time? How did the Reverend Graham become so convinced of the Bible as true words of God and become a major vector of Bible memes and spend his life infecting others? Why did all of the Presidents since World War 2 seek his comfort, have him sleep over at the White House dozens of times? What the hell is going on? Hell, hell is what is going on. Hell is the result when we believe in tribal myth and no longer think. I am going to show you in no uncertain terms that Billy Graham is the administer of hell. Read on.
Well the story goes something like this, he washes out of school and is looking for a purpose, he meets up with a traveling flimflam Evangelist Mordecai Ham and Billy is struck down by the faith and fervor of this man. Billy Graham was converted by a traveling salesman at a revival in North Carolina. Conspiracy theorists note, no Rothschilds involved, this is a classic case of memetic propagation.
What if you’re Wrong Billy?
During his college years, when Billy decides to go all in, his best friend asks “What if it’s wrong (the Bible) Billy, feeble stories written by men like you and me?” Billy Graham’s answer is classic – “How can it be wrong, it’s the word of God”. This is where Billy Graham proves he is possessed by the memes and no longer is a critical thinker. When Billy Graham graduates from being a gentile and becomes fully ‘Judaised’, his neurons are now patterned to the memes of the Bible, his mind ordered to the Bible way of thinking, which is the Jewish supremacist way of thinking. The decision point, where Billy commits his entire being, mentally and emotionally is when he decides that the Bible is written by God and thus is to be taken literal, or word for word, true. Billy Graham believes that “god” wrote the Bible, every word is exactly correct. There is a problem with that conclusion, the Bible can not be taken literal. Myth can not be taken literal because it is myth and in the case of the Holy Bible it is heavily plagiarized myth, a concoction of previous myths. A Bible literalist is committing a severe error of judgment by emotionally and intellectually committing to the words of a book. What if the book is wrong or contains errors?
Well as every scholar knows the Bible has tons of errors, some whoppers. For instance say you believe in the virgin birth of “god”. This is a very common mythological construct. How did that god come about? Oh, that god was born of a virgin. But that can be a deadly thing to believe because it can be used to denigrate sex or women. Millions of people think sex is dirty because of that meme, it causes all kinds of sexual problems and a huge need for the porn business for all those unable to pursue normal sexual relations because of guilt. By believing in the virgin birth sex is made to be bad, dirty, a thing that animals do.
What does a rational scientific person think about the Holy Spirit making Mary pregnant with god? Didn’t happen because everyone comes into this world the same way, by sex. But not Billy Graham and his troupe of Bible believers, they really believe that story, literal. Do I care? Not until this man becomes the adviser to Presidents and public policy is being set based on the mythological beliefs.
Billy Graham went all the way with his faith. This complete acceptance of belief over reason is a state of possession, when you throw the towel in an believe with all of your heart, a state of unwavering faithfulness. It is a state of consciousness where all doubt is completely erased, this is when you know that person is possessed by the memes. Not “god”, not the “devil”, but the words and phrases of the holy book. Got that? Billy Graham isn’t possessed by god or the devil, he is possessed by a set of memes in a book.
Now this state of possession is considered to be the goal of the Evangelical types. They consider it to be a good thing, lol, they can even recognize it. When they find it in one of their members, they make that person the preacher. A preacher’s charisma might be a measurement in how well they believe. If you really, really believe, with your soul beaming through your physical being then everyone will gather ’round and listen to your every word. When someone has this “gift’, it is recognized, promoted, and sought after. Why it’s just like the ‘ole times found in the Bible, when real prophets roamed the hills of Judea. Billy Graham was one of these men, Billy Graham is considered to be a modern prophet because of his perfect faith.
By reading and studying the Bible, Billy Grahams mind is being ordered to Jewish supremacist thinking, he is being voluntarily brain washed by his own choice, conditioned to think prejudically, he reads that Bible and comes to the conclusion that everyone who doesn’t believe in Jesus is going to hell. Not every Christian concludes that but he does because his mind is tipped toward judgment. Remember that. Thousands of hours of study is an investment, how can anyone who has invested a large part of their life remain skeptical and continue down the road to Evangelism if they don’t go all in? They have so much invested, not to fully believe is a tacit admission that their holy book isn’t true. Ahhh. This is where the dishonesty starts, when you know the Bible isn’t literally true (because you are studying it at the collegiate level) but you decide to believe all the way, anyway. This can make one crazy, because many of the Bible memes are contradictory.
For instance say you believe in Jehovah, the judgmental Jewish deity of the Old Testament, but you also believe God is love. The two can never meet because judgment is exactly the opposite of love. Love can not judge, this is metaphysically impossible. So these two ideas battle out in one’s mind, if you have Old Testament leanings like most Evangelists then judgmental god will rule; Jesus is pushed to the side, he’s a wimp anyways always turning the other cheek, maybe he’s a fag. Thus when push comes to shove and the bombing starts the Evangelist will side with the power structure. They think this way – we are right because we believe in the right god, god is on our side so whatever we do must be right and if we are bombing them then they must deserve it because we never do wrong. Some might even say, “why are you making me bomb you!” The victim of the aggression is always the guilty party when using Jewish supremacist logic.
As you can infer, the Palestinians are really f-cked. Billy Graham has zero sympathy for them, they are not just opposing the USA, they are going against Israel which is like going against God Almighty. To make sure it works out that way, these Christians believers, lol, send tons of money and weapons to the Jewish state, they really don’t wish to find out that their beliefs are wrong. You must understand they really enjoy Israel bombing defenseless civilians, every time some Palestinian ghetto kids get blasted to kingdom come by USA made F-16′s the hosannas and praises to the Lord God Almighty are sung in the hearts of these heartless bastards. Evangelists worship hell, they worship the military use of state power, not life or love.
Evangelicals shed no tears for dead or wounded Palestinians. Their hearts are closed because of what they believe. Maybe some day psychologists and scientists can determine how this works, how memes affect our emotions. Non-believers, like me, are horrified. I am angered by these evil people who do this, how about you?
The Great Tragedy
The greatest irony of this entire tragedy is that the Jews killing Palestinians are actually Polish born Khazars killing the “real Jews” who are the Palestinians. Texe Marrs explains (and he is about to release a new book on this subject):
Those living today who profess to be “Jews” are not of the ancient Israelites, and they are not the seed of Abraham. In fact, the new DNA research shows that the Palestinians actually have more Israelite blood than do the “Jews!”
The “Jews” of America, Europe, and Israel are descendants not of Father Abraham but of King Bulan and the people of ancient Khazaria.
Later, the “Jews” (Khazars) emigrated, settling in Russia, Hungary, Poland, Germany, and elsewhere in Europe. As “Jews,” the Khazars then left the European nations in 1948 and settled the fledgling, new nation of Israel.
Texe Marrs also points out that all of the Prime Ministers of Israel are Polish born, with the exception of Netanyahu, who had Polish parents. Polish Khazars run the modern state of Israel, they believe they are Jews and wage Biblical like war on their enemies, everyone and everything not Jewish. What right does Israel have to exist? Genome research has destroyed the genetic argument, archeology has destroyed the historicity argument (see Shlomo Sand’s “The Invention of the Jewish People“), and comparative mythology has destroyed the mythological arguments. So what right does Israel have to exist? None. None whatsoever.
But Billy Graham believes Israel is doing exactly what God wants. Israel is God’s country. So you can see why pro-Zionist Presidents love Billy Graham, they are getting moral cover for their despicable deeds. What President wouldn’t want the most faithful man by his side when committing the most foul acts, like doing false flags then bombing and destroying whole nations, cultures, leveling cities, burning people alive with white phosphorous? Lyndon Johnson sought Billy as his constant companion, when you are the devil like LBJ (the prime beneficiary and suspect in the murder of JFK) then do you not seek to have the high priest of comfort by your side? You know you are doing wrong, but you have the power, so you do it anyways and you want approval by god’s ambassador. And dear reader, Billy Graham gave these devils full emotional comfort and blessings.
Bad Billy Goat – Channeling Hell in the Name of Jesus
America has been destroyed by preachers like Billy Graham, but I don’t rank him #1, I assign that to Hal Lindsey who wrote “The Late Great Planet Earth”. Hal Lindsey was more influential in prepping Christian America for its upcoming Neocon future:
“Hal Lindsey single-handedly killed America because he delivered tens of millions of Christians into the pro-Israel, pro-Zionist, pro-Neocon fold. Satan, himself, could not have done a better job.(2) Hal Lindsey is one of the world’s greatest charismatic Evangelical crusaders, his success led to ruination of America, he converted and delivered millions of believers and molded them into a right wing Christian Zionist grass roots political movement. No man did a better job recruiting loyalists for Zionist Israel and prepping conservative Christians for the upcoming Neocon future.”
The unthinking masses love Billy Graham. Presidents love their billy goat. God-Bible-Presidents-War-Hell. They all go together. I am no believer and no preacher but I have read the New Testament, I do know what it says, the main theme of Jesus is very clear – love one another, turn the other cheek, forgive thy neighbor, etc. Nowhere in the New Testament does Jesus tell you to get the best weapons, plot to kill the other peoples, support Israel, kill, bomb, make hell, mayhem, and genocide. Is Billy Graham following the words of Jesus? Nope. Is Billy Graham a disciple of Jesus if he morally underwrites the Presidents that make war? Not a chance. So why are so many so duped? Why has Evangelical Christian America become the cheerleaders of hell? Christians love to ask WWJD? What would Jesus tell the president bombing the hell out of the Vietnamese? Exactly the opposite of what Billy Graham advises. Billy Graham is a minister of hell.
Billy Graham, the alpha male Christian preacher is channeling hell with his beliefs. He believes he’s right, he’s a crypto Jewish supremacist and has helped caused the deaths of millions. Houston, Christianity has a problem. Christians can’t be Christians so long as they keep the Old Testament attached to their religion. So long a the racist genocidal memes of the Old Testament are still being installed into Christian minds then Christianity can be turned to the dark side.
Lucky for Billy Graham there’s no hell waiting for him.
Anyone paying attention knows that Alex Jones has an obsession with attacking Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. He does so for one reason and one reason only, he is a disinformation specialist, he is demonizing National Socialism and will not say the name of the enemy or any reference that directly links the Jews and Zionists to the criminal network looting the nation. Alex Jones uses a slew of euphemisms to hide the enemy, he calls the Zionists the New World Order, Globalists, or Germanic Dealt Cults. Alex Jones is famous for calling the enemy everything except for what it actually is, thus Alex Jones is aiding and abetting the Zionist entity and is no patriot but a clever disinformation warrior.
Germanic Death Cult Named as the Source of Zionism
Alex Jones interviewed Maxwell Jordan and these two went off in an orgasmic frenzy naming the Germans as the source of Zionism. This, is of course, complete nonsense. The single source of Zionism is Judaism. Zionism is the outgrowth of a line of exclusionary thinking patterns, the Jews are god’s chosen ones, the Jews were given the gentiles as their cattle (goyim). Supremacist Jews actually believe that they own you. You are a cow that is to be milked and killed according to wishes of these Jewish farmers. Recent Rabbinic statements prove this, one of the top Israeli state approved Rabbis still hold to these archaic ideas:
“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel,” – Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
It is no accident that the world is run the way it is, the world is being exploited based on Judaic thinking, Zionism is the political expression of Judaism. So the reader might ask why doesn’t Alex Jones expose this obvious conspiracy, after all Alex Jones is a very smart man. Why does Alex Jones, instead, bash the Nazis? Why indeed? What do the Nazis have to do with anything in the world today, were they not defeated and outlawed? The answer is simple, he is a shill protecting the real power structure, he is leading the patriots and Christians exactly the wrong away by not naming the real perpetrators. He is substituting Nazis for Zionists, is he not demonizing the very group that needs to be studied and emulated in order to deal with Jewish supremacism? Alex Jones is demonizing the German solution of the Jewish problem, he is making the Nazis out as the ultimate evil to prevent you from realizing the obvious that we are the new Germans under the oppression of International Jewry.
Alex Jones is waging an infowar on your mind, so that your mind is boxed in unable to consider the possibility of nationalism as a viable alternative to Bolshevik Communism or Fascist Capitalism, he is keeping your mind from examining the flow of historical events, that what is happening to America is directly linked to the past. History has come full circle, America is the new bankrupt Weimar Republic. The Republic is gone, just like Weimar Germany the American Constitutional Republic is history, so now how are you going to fight the enemy? Complaining to the school board? Voting for the two main political parties who are completely whored to AIPAC/Zionists/Necons/Jews? Praying to Jesus? LOL! What are you going to do to actually get your freedom and government back? YOU MUST FORM A POLITICAL PARTY OPPOSED TO INTERNATIONAL JEWRY, YOU MUST DO SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT THE GERMANS DID IN THE 1920′S AND 30′S. What is Alex Jones’ job? To prevent you from realizing the obvious solution, that supremacist Jews and their Zionist cohorts have subverted America just like Germany and that America has the same problem Hitler faced. Alex Jones, the great conspiracy theorist, is totally full of crap, he is not talking about the number one problem that America faces.
Jonestown Koolaid, a Special Flavor of Bullshillvek Red just for Christians
Alex Jones is serving up a big glass of poisoned punch and it could get a good many people killed. Alex Jones is draping an invisibility cloak over the Jews, this is deadly, by not exposing the enemy he is aiding the enemy. He’s no patriot, he is working you over and getting wealthy in the process, he is selling you and your freedom down the river. When someone challenges Jonestown about his lack of integrity regarding Jewish nature of the conspiracy he flies off the handle, becomes enraged, his behavior is so schizoid that it has spurred a slew of handles that describe him such as Rabbi Jonestein, Alex Jewns, Jonestown, etc. I prefer “Jonestown” because it conjores up the image of the infamous Jonestown massacre, the Jim Jones koolaid drinking death cult.
Think about it, what group do the ruling class of Supremacist Jews fear the most? Nazis. Why? The Third Reich was the first state in human history that named the Jews as the enemy of mankind. The Nazis took control of their nation-state and made it German again, they organized it against the International Jewry, specifically they started a national socialist political system and German bank not based on usury, put everyone to work and created an economic miracle. We are in the same sinking boat. Look at how the manufacturing jobs have been stripped from America, inflationary policies of the Jewish owned Federal Reserve have worn a devastating effect on American jobs, the nation is piling up debt that it is unable to pay and the good jobs are gone.
If the world was under control of the Nazis, like Jonestein claims, then why is it that in Germany you not allowed to possess Mein Kampf or challenge the official Holocaust story? What a laugh Alex Jones is, he is the conspiracy king who never talks about the real conspiracy of supremacist Judaism. Alex Jones takes on every conspiracy imaginable except for the one that actually counts. He has never broached the Holocaust storyline and how it is used to extort money and weapons, like nuclear powered submarines gifted to Israel. Alex Jonestein is a kosher approved conspiracy theorist, he is herding the Christian patriots into a box canyon with no way out. Alex Jones Nazi bashing is a ploy that is without merit, Zion Crime Factory’s essay about his pathological lying totally destroys Alex Jones’ credibility:
“First of all, Adolf Hitler was a patriotic German nationalist who endeavored to create a Germany for Germans alone; quite the opposite of a “globalist NWO” type. Secondly, Hitler and his National Socialist movement were staunchly anti-Marxist/Communist/Bolshevik and therefore anti-Internationalist and anti-Globalist. The sinister agenda of Communism, not National Socialism, was internationalism — the overthrow and vanquishment of all existing nation states in order to establish a despotic global communist super-state. The pathological criminal madness known as Communism was, from its inception, an international Jewish conspiracy for the destruction and subjugation of the Gentile world whereupon a tyrannical global Jewish imperium would be established. Communism was nothing more than an expression and manifestation of the hateful, supremacist doctrines of the Jewish Talmud, which states: “Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.” (Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10) Alex is deceptively projecting the evil and destructive legacy of Jewish Bolshevism onto Hitler and Nazi Germany. ”
Alex Jones the Judas Goat
A Judas Goat is an older goat trained to herd sheep and goats, to lead other goats to the slaughter house. Alex Jones is herding the Christian sheep into a box canyon. This is easy to do. Christians already live under a delusion of a Jewish based myth, they worship a Jewish deity, they believe the Jews are god’s chosen people, thus it is easy to substitute faux enemies for the real one. Most Christians can not condemn Jews because they would be condemning their own faith, so Alex Jones has the simple task of substituting the identity of the enemy because it maintains their mythological illusion and believers denial of reality. How can the most insidious enemy of all time be the very people you base and trust your life upon? You can’t criticize the Jews when you are hoping to spend eternity with a Jewish god.
Unfortunately, because of the current severe crisis with how religion in America is being manipulated for the benefit of the elite, we must discuss the the God (of the Bible). God only exists in two places, in a book and in a human mind. There is no (Bible) god outside of those two places, the god idea resides in your brain. You can look in the clouds for god, you will not find him. You can look on mountain tops, he is not there. You can go to the nearby planets and you will find out that Jupiter, Mars, and Venus are not gods. You can build a really big space telescope and look back into time, 15 billions years into the past, at proto galaxies and you will not see god’s hand. Nearly every phenomenon can be explained rationally because we live in a scientific age, we no longer believe that thunder and lightning are of an angry god. We no longer worship planets, the sun or stars as gods. Such beliefs have been overcome by a greater perception of reality, those gods have been transcended, in fact nearly all of the ten thousand previous gods have been discarded by the human mind except for a remaining few.
The God of the Bible still stands because he is invisible and can’t be disproven so easily like the earlier gods. The Bible God is still very real to millions, but in reality it is a mind virus, it is an idea that lives only in your mind. God is a meme, that must be transferred from mind to mind by witnessing and direct contact. If god was real then no one would have to explain it to others, for god would be self evident like air or water. An omnipotent god doesn’t need your help, but the Bible god does and he wants your money. Isn’t it funny how the Creator of the Universe, this all powerful Jewish deity, just happens to need Jewish usury money? Am I the only one that sees how blatantly obvious this con is? Maybe the Jews need you to believe in their god and for you to tithe so that they can rule over you. Maybe the desert tribe of wandering Gypsies are very good at the art of the god con job, they have conned you out of your money and freedom because they got you to believe in their god and made themselves the exclusive chosen ones of this god.
This god of the Jews is patently not self evident, it must be learned from a book. The masses believe in god because of mass indoctrination, the god meme is pounded into their brains. In those areas where atheistic government rules, like China or North Korea, there is almost no belief in the Bible god. America is a nation with many Christians, a large part of Alex Jones’ audience is in the Bible belt, he broadcasts out of Austin, Texas – a Baptist stronghold. Virtually no Baptist believes 911 is an inside job, virtually no Baptist can intuit that Israel did 911 and you can bet your last shekel that Alex Jones will never tell them. Baptists form a large part of Christian Zionists and are completely blind to how the Jews are attacking America and destroying her. That is why the Bible God must be discussed as a memetic infection of the brain.
The Amazing Survival Strategy of the God Parasite and the Tribe
The Jews are a parasitic tribe, their success was their ability to infect other minds via their book. This book called the Holy Bible makes them the kings of humanity, so those who believe in this book are in effect making the authors their god. Some think the Federal Reserve is the greatest con, but the fiat money machine pales in comparison with this religion. The con works like this, I tell the easy marks I’m special, they give up something they worked to obtain if I get them to believe. If I tell someone that I am their god, they might laugh or even kill me. How am I to get their money, why would people give up their hard earned efforts unless they were sold on a good story? Have you noticed that the TV evangelists are slimy, disgusting snake oil salesman? They are being handsomely rewarded for pushing the god meme out the door, and they get tax free status to boot. The preacher is a salesman of Jewish supremacism, he is selling god and his chosenites and making himself rich. Many are slick con artists, it is questionable if they actually believe in what they are peddling. Just look at the hypocrisy of these vermin, their secret gay behavior.
Once this parasitic lifestyle is learned, the parasite realizes it would be far easier if everyone believed in this special status.
This week, Senator John McCain entered Syria illegally to meet with “rebels.” However, photos of those McCain met with proved an embarrassment. McCain met with top Al Qaeda lieutenants long on terror watch lists, long cited as high value targets of America’s drone war. McCain met with the enemy. Who better than McCain, known by veterans as the “Hanoi songbird.” From a Press TV Viewpoint by VT’s Jim W. Dean:
“Mind you these are the heads of an opposition that have no control over their fighters whatsoever. They are looting and raping where they please, and have begun taking religious hostages like the Christian Orthodox bishops.
This blew up in John McCain’s face when one of the kidnapped victims’ families spotted one of the kidnappers in McCain’s front line photo op. He was the one in the rear with the camera. It looks like ‘bomb bomb McCain’ bombed his credibility into further oblivion. But he is still for sale, especially to the Israelis, so that makes him dangerous.
We had the story break that the FSA has been running a sex slave business out of the camps in Turkey using teenage refugee girls. This even beats the pretend-a-mullahs in the Persian Gulf giving the OK for the al-Nusra brigades to rape who they want by allowing three-day temporary marriages to do so.”
McCain, exposed for his role in supporting terrorist groups fighting the US, Russia and now Syria is not the biggest recent embarrassment. Key to efforts to ”Balkanize” Syria are the Chechen fighters being flown in by the hundreds. That relationship, the use of Chechens by the CIA and Mossad to support terrorist activities was nearly exposed this week. The FBI was forced to execute a “possible bombing suspect” who had, in actuality, threatened to expose FBI complicity in the Boston Marathon bombings.
In an interview earlier today with Defense Intelligence and Treasury Department sources, it was confirmed that the FBI is now being looked at as fully complicit in more than one recent terrorist act. During the conversation it was noted:
“You know, the fact that we have to use a secure line to discuss efforts to support the US government is ironic. We are afraid our phones are tapped, not by an overzealous government but by terrorist organizations within our government, tasked with destroying that same government.”
Ibragim Todashev was killed by Israeli trained Massachusetts state troopers and FBI agents to keep him from coming forward about police and FBI complicity in the Boston terror attack. From CBS News:
”The father of a Chechen immigrant killed in Florida while being interrogated by the FBI about his ties to a Boston Marathon bombings suspect said Thursday that the U.S. agents killed his son “execution-style.”
At news conference in Moscow, Abdul-Baki Todashev showed journalists 16 photographs that he said were of his son, Ibragim, in a Florida morgue. He said his son had six gunshot wounds to his torso and one to the back of his head and the pictures were taken by his son’s friend, Khusen Taramov.”
THE REAL BIRTH OF AL QAEDA
There was never an organization known as Al Qaeda, not until now. “Phony Al Qaeda” was an imaginary boogeyman enemy constructed out of false flag terrorists employed by a variety of intelligence agencies to bring the world to economic collapse. History makes this hypothesis a “slam dunk.”
There was no “Al Qaeda,” a extremist, jihadist movement intent on warring against Christianity on behalf of, well, we aren’t really sure, until if was formed in Syria. There, up to 80,000 fighters from 27 nations are at war with the government. The majority are there to create a terrorist empire as a base of operations to attack the United States, Europe and Russia. None are there to war on Israel or support Palestinian rights. This is extremely curious.
They are flown into Jordan, planeload after planeload by private cargo carriers contracted to the CIA and Department of Defense. Two dozen Boeing 747s sit waiting at an abandoned SAC (Strategic Air Command) base in Northern Michigan. These planes, contracted to the CIA, can carry 8,000 Al Qaeda fighters a day. Problem is, this isn’t the only such facility. There are many. In fact, “Al Qaeda” has far more air transport capability that, not just Israel but Britain and France combined.
When America first attacked Afghanistan after 9/11, the organization we know of as “Al Qaeda” didn’t exist. Some 300 jihadists were living in Afghanistan under government protection, know known to have had nothing to do with 9/11 or any attacks on America.
However, Donald Rumsfeld claimed their numbers were up to 100,000, a wild invention, one of many insane fabrication he and so many others, particularly members of America’s military and intelligence community took part in, acts of treason.
RADIO: Veterans Today Editor Gordon Duff and Whistleblower Stew Webb
Stew you’re the only person to go after the pinnacle of the Zionist Organized Crime Leonard Millman, your-ex-in-law and Larry Mizel, Millman’s Buffer.”—Gordon Duff May 16, 2013
Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today. His career has included extensive experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as diplomatic representative for UN humanitarian and economic development efforts. Gordon Duff has traveled to over 80 nations. His articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages. He is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest.
Stew Webb Radio Store
Bush Illuminati Human Sacrifice Denver June 20-21 2018
REAL NEWS PRESIDENT TRUMP DOESN’T WANT YOU TO MISS
President Trump Twitter feed
FBI Raids Satanic Human Sacrifice Video
Letter to Kansas City US Attorney Timothy Garrison purpose to Prosecute Cyber Terrorism April 18 2010
SEE: PROOF (Exhibits 1-22 below) Attemped murder of Stew Webb Federal Whistle blower and Grandview, Missouri Police Covered up the car crash.
March 26, 2018 Letter to President Trump Stop NSA NAZI Espionage
Please email or twitter to President Trump
Letter to President Trump 2017-02-23 from Whistle blowers How to Drain the Swamp Monsters
President Trump Stop Cyber Terrorism against Stew Webb Whistle blower
George Bush High Treason Illegal Sale of F-16s, Apache Helicopters, M-1 Tanks
AIPAC and Abramoff Operate Child Sex Blackmail Ring
Stew Webb 34 Years a Federal Whistle blower
Stew Webb served in the United States Marine Corps and was Honorable Discharge. Stew was a General Contractor-Home Builder until 3 car crashes in one year and is now disabled. Stew turned Federal Whistle blower – Activist of 31 years and has been a guest on over 3,000 Radio and TV Programs since September 18, 1991 and now has his own Radio and TV Network http://www.stewwebb.com Stew was responsible for the Congressional Investigations and hearings that lead to the Appointment of Independent Prosecutor Arlin Adams in the 1989 HUD Hearings, the Silverado Savings and Loan Hearings, the Denver International Airport Frauds hearings, the MDC Holdings, Inc. (MDC-NYSE) Illegal Political Campaign Money Laundering Colorado’s biggest case aka Keating 5 hearings and the information provided that lead to the 2008 Illegal Bank Bailout.
Stew was held as a Political Prisoner from 1992-1993 to silence his exposure by Leonard Millman his former in law with illegal charges of threatening harassing telephone calls charges which were dismissed with prejudice. Leonard Millman, George HW Bush, George W Bush, Jeb Bush, Neil Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Larry Mizel, Phil Winn, Norman Brownstein, John McCain and Mitt Romney to name a few are all partners in what is known as the Bush-Millman-Clinton Organized Crime Syndicate. Leonard Millman (Deceased 2004) was member of the “Illuminati Council of 13”
Fair Use Notice
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.