Blog Archives

Illuminati it is your Turn Soon


Your kind Contributions are very much appreciated thank you. – Stew Webb



Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died


By Jim Fetzer (with Paul Preston as interviewed by Sofia Smallstorm)

I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag”–Paul Preston

Paul Preston

Sofia Smallstorm, who produced and directed the documentary, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”, which many regard as the best video study of the Sandy Hook event, recently interviewed a Los Angeles school expert, Paul Preston, about Sandy Hook and his knowledge of what had transpired.

Governor Malloy had held a press conference that day, explaining that he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen, which raised the question, what “something like this” did he mean? Had he been told a school shooting massacre would take place? or a drill that would be presented as a real event, which appears to be what took place?

Remarkably, we now have confirmation from an unexpected source. Paul Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S. Department of Education of the Barack Obama administration, who confirmed to him on the basis of their own personal knowledge that:

(1) it had been a drill;

(2) no children had been killed; and,

(3) it had been done to promote an anti-gun agenda.

Given his background of 41 years in the California public school system (from custodian to district superintendent) and having served as a teacher, coach, vice-principal and principal before retiring in 2012 as the superintendent of two charter schools, I thought what he had to say about Sandy Hook deserved widespread dissemination.

So when I did a two-hour show on Revolution Radio, “False Flags (9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing)” on 30 May 2014, as the third segment, I included the second 30-minutes of Sofia’s interview with Paul Preston, which is archived on “The Real Deal” and can be heard here:
Because Preston is also highly trained in school safety issues and had himself organized drills of many kinds, including active-shooter drills, what he has to say is especially telling. He has a website of his own at, which he created to alert listeners to the peirls Agenda 21.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Transcript of 30-minute clip of Sofia Smallstorm interviewing Paul Preston

Transcription by Jeannon

S = Sofia Smallstrom

P = Paul Preston

S – Welcome back everyone to the Speed of Light on the Pure Momemtum Network. This is Sofia Smallstorm and we’re listening to a very interesting discussion – Paul Preston, school principal, school safety consultant, teacher, coach, and superintendent. He has been in the California system for 41 years. He is now retired.

So Paul, let’s continue. Can we get a little bit into Sandy Hook now and what set off your antenna about it?

P – Well, you know I’ve been involved in many many situations at schools that have been, you know, emergency type situations and was involved even to some degree with the Columbine situation in that we had an individual who as trying to blow up the school, our school, at the time. In a similar fashion to what was a predicted bomb threat that occurred at Columbine thee days before the Columbine shooting, and that’s how we kind of got in touch with the Columbine people. They got in touch with us because it turned out to be a similar neo-Nazi group that was related to the Trench Coat Mafia, of all people.

And so learning and watching ad seeing all these incidences play out, all these school shootings, I took an enormous interest in because we were doing a study trying to determine because the neo-Nazis we had been working with in our school along the same time of the Columbine incident were telling us that there was going to be some big event take place. And so our staff, myself, we all wanted to sit down and figure where this was all going to and we studied a lot of the Nazi websites and so on, and we figured out that yes, something big was going to happen.

Well then Caolumbine happened. So we watched with a lot of intensity and under with my own circumstances and also with watching the videos and replays of the other active shooter situations, I became sort of a specialist in that and applied it to my own active-shooter training that I was doing and conducting with my own people.

S – Right. And now can we get in to Sandy Hook?

P – Well yes. Of all the hundreds of hours that I spent watching these scenarios and investigating and reporting on them on my radio show, the first thing I noticed when I heard about Sandy Hook when I turned on the TV like everybody else – now I have always told everybody when you’re seeing these things play out in real time, the best news reporting is what’s happening in real time – that day of, you know, the moments that are around the incident. But document for yourself what’s going on because you’ll never see it again.

And the first thing that caught my eye as I was watching everything play out was the lack of intensity with which people were moving and that really disturbed me. It hit me within the first few minutes, watching the video, the helicopters flying around and so on. Things just didn’t seem to be right, like I would always understand in an incident command system. People weren’t rushing around. People weren’t panicking. They ran that one guy off into the woods and then they arrested him. They took him away and there was no connectedness to that.

I was also wondering why all the emergency equipment wasn’t around the school. And I didn’t see any students either and that really bothered me.

S – So, it was almost like too slow motion for a real event. Not enough panic. Not enough chaos. You had mentioned chaos earlier being a part of these real situations. And a lot of support people rushing around like press and police but not running fast enough, not running with intensity and alarm and panic and concern, I think.

P – None of that was there.

S – Yes. So all right, and then what did you start thinking?

P – Well, just within the first 10 or 15 minutes, it just all looked too staged to me, and I know about staging these things since I’ve staged a number of them. And, like I said, then you stage something there’s a complete lack of intensity as you would have in a real scenario when there’s panic really taking hold of people and they’re really afraid and they’re screaming and yelling and so on.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

But the one thing that really bothered me was where were the kids. You know they had how many hundreds of kids there at the school. I didn’t see them.

S – Right

P – And there was lack of accounting for them.

And right away – and I’ll juxtaposition this with the situation that happened in Pennsylvania. You saw the kids right away. I know it’s a high school, but you know, you saw the kids right away and you saw their plan of evacuation of the school unfolding.

Now this is where it really falls apart with Sandy Hook for me. I saw… I saw no evidence of a real plan of student evacuation taking place. And that stuck to my head like crazy when I was in the moments watching this whole thing play out in real time.

S – That’s very interesting. No evidence of a real plan. Because only someone… I mean everybody had their own response to it. Some of us were already clued in from previous kinds of situations. All this has got to be not what they’re telling us it is. But you come from the industry, the business, and you felt that there is… I would say you knew… It probably was not even a feeling. It was like, you know, set in stone in your head. Where’s the plan? I don’t see the plan playing itself out. Right?

P – I saw same of your evacuation centers and I saw some of your colored tarps on the ground, the colored taps and so on, but even that pretty odd because normally if you have the tarps out there…in every active shooter situation you have ever see, there’s somebody on the tarp or there’s been some help that’s been given to somebody when somebody has been wounded, but none of that was even evident. And I don’t see anybody trying to rush to anybody’s help at all in a mass casualty situation.

See, when you don’t see that…I mean…I’ll go back to the example that I have before about the 13 who overdosed. We had people everywhere, and we had people everywhere until everybody was safe, which was 35, 40 minutes, almost an hour. And that was never happening there at Sandy Hook. You didn’t see the mass of people doing that.

S – Yes, it’s more like the press filled in for that missing element. The press sounded more concerned and panicked on TV as they reported but the actual participants were not so… And we got, you know, long after the fact we got the supposed 911 calls, we got various people giving their versions of it on television as they got interviewed. But we didn’t see it on the ground. And so how long did you watch it for? Over a period of days, weeks? And what were your thoughts?

YouTube – Veterans Today –

P – You know, I make it a study. I study these things intensely, and what really, what really put me over the top was the next morning with Robbie Parker going out there, and I saw that clip as it happened. And I said there’s something really wrong here.

And that’s when I started thinking about the… the actors. You can actually rent these actors out. In fact that put these things up for training all the time.

And I just said ‘this is not… first of all, his demeanor was terrible. I would never go out…and I know sometimes this happens but… to send a parent out to talk to the press in that fashion about the daughter that he just lost. None of that seemed to be appropriate. None of it seemed to fit. And his behavior with the smiling laughing thing and getting into character that you could see. I said ‘ hmmm, I’m not buying this. I’m just not buying it.’

S – Yes, I know. Very few other people did. So, did you contact anyone? Did you speak to anyone? I don’t mean officially but in your own network of friends.

P – Yes.

S – And what were their thoughts.

P – Almost everybody was unanimous that it was a false flag.

S – And when did you start looking it up on the Internet – because I think people started posting immediately. You know, they were making YouTubes. The community began to express online. So when did you start looking into all of that?

P – We – a side note to this is that I have a lot of sources in and around and in that area. I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag.

S – Now these are quasi-official… what kind of sources are these?

P – Let me say that there are the sources that are very close to this administration who knows what’s going on.

S – Really. So they are really like almost insiders then?

P – Oh yes.

S – And they all… they say it was a false flag because they figured it out like you did, or they had actually factual knowledge of such..

P – They had factual knowledge of such. That’s part of the plan.

S – I see. And so how much were they willing to tell you, and what else were they willing to tell you? Anything?

P – Oh, they told me quite a bit, and some of it I can’t reveal to you, but it fits the narrative of the anti-gun movement and the disarmament of America and that’s what the focus was.

S – And you realized that that’s part of the broader picture? That’s the Agenda 21 society?

P – Absolutely.

S – So do you want to tell us a little but about that or do you want to stick with the Sandy Hook material? I’ll let you decide.

P – Well, let’s go ahead with the Sandy Hook material and then we can jump into that.

S – OK, so we’re past Robbie Parker now, and what about the funerals? You must have known then that … Did you have any concept about victims or no victims, et cetera?

P – Well, that whole thing was pretty shaky. What was really starting to filter in in the system and was just confirming what I was already being told about these charity sites that had been developed. By the way, they were put up the day before the shooting. And I had gotten some screen shots, and I had confirmed with my sources. Some of them were thinking that it was a very sloppy operation actually.

But there were reassurances to me that there really were no victims and that everything’s being staged.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

And of course the funerals to me… you go and look at the whole funeral process. It looked like they were all staged, from the Robbie Parker one in Utah, or the Sarah Parker one with the Parker family.

And then I started getting information from people that actually had attended that funeral who lived in Utah and said that was something very funny about it.

S – Now I would like to ask you whether your sense is that these are real families even, or are they patched together?

P – Well, you know, that’s a good question because, you know, the thing that rolls around in my head, you know, the actors type of thing, you know. You know because you can put families together and these acting programs will do that under certain training scenarios. And so, it’s a good question. It really is a fair question to ask whether or not they were real families.

S – And then of course because they continue to speak and organize and be called upon to comment, they have to be formed into these family groupings over time. And remain grouped like that whether they are truly married or not.

You know, here’s one thing that I noticed. When you see a couple, if they seem really like an odd couple, then that kind of strikes you as weird. And I saw that. I saw a very odd coupled-ness with lots of these Sandy Hook families. It seemed to me, why would this person marry this person and live with them? They’re so totally different. That happens sometimes but in this content it really jumped out at me… myself anyway. I didn’t know if you noticed that…

P – It’ different to say, you know, when you saw them together whether they are natural families or not. That’s… I’m suspicious of that. And like I say, I’m suspicious because I know that you can put these families together, you know, with some of these acting companies out there. And that just kind of blends in with what I was already being suspicious about.

And so, there’s a lot of things that would go into the details of examining this. And I’ve see a lot of the pictures and so on, and some of the pictures don’t match up, especially the one of the Parkers in the White House. And it looks like to me that’s Sarah Parker sitting there that’s, you know, supposed to be a victim.

S – There’s no Sarah Parker…

P – Which one is it… maybe it’s not the Parker…

S – Oh, you mean with Obama…

P – Yes, right.

S – Emilie or Madeline …those are the two order sisters, and a lot of people felt that that was Emilie Parker leaning on Obama.

P – Yes, that was Emilie Parker…

YouTube – Veterans Today –

S – Have you seen the Super Bowl video?

P – Yes, I have seen that.

S – Well, there is a girl who looks a lot like an older Emilie Parker in that video. So if that was Emilie at the White House, or actually I think… I don’t know if it was at the White House… but with Obama, she couldn’t be six in one picture and then just a month or two later, twelve or thirteen.

P – Right.

S – That’s where we have to make a decision.

But what did you think of all the photographs of the children? Did you notice anything – the portraits that we were shown that these were the victims? Did you notice anything about those portraits?

P – No, other than some of the malformations of different parts of their bodies – seemed to be a pretty obvious thing.

The whole thing… when you take a look at the totality of this, in my opinion, it’s very sloppily done.

S – Why would it have been sloppily done though?

P – Well, you know, when… and again, it’s kind of like sometimes there’s order that comes out of chaos. And when you have these chaotic situations, people want to put things back together as best they possibly can to feel more comfortable or to recover from it. And I didn’t see any of that. I don’t know if that makes any sense to anybody. People don’t want to have that chaos. They want to heal. They want to come back together. They want to solve a problem so that they can move forward.

And that’s part of what happens when you do these drills is that you take a day or so and you talk about what happened so that you can improve upon and make it better. People do that naturally even when there’s chaos and there’s an emergency situation because they want to seek normalcy again.

I didn’t see the same kind of emotions, if you will, or the same kind of communications between parents, kids, that you would normally see in these situations. It just didn’t look…it looked phony to me.

S – So you mean the community itself, they did not try to repair in the organic way…?

P – I would say that is true, from the parents to the kids, to the entire community.

S – What do you think of this privacy issue that has been bandied about by the authorities, that all the privacy needs to be respected, and you can’t reveal this or that…?

P – That to me just adds more fuel to the fire because that’s not what you do in the normal situation of an incident command system. You get the facts out because you know oftentimes when you get the facts out, you’re also looking for criminal behavior, and the more information that you can get out that that’s way, the better.

And I’m certainly not buying the notion that the parents weren’t allowed to see the kids.

S – The bodies, identifying the…

P – I just…that to me… that should be a red flag to anybody who has looked in to Sandy Hook. The parents weren’t allowed to do that. What’s up with that?

YouTube – Veterans Today –

S – And what did you think of the coroner’s behavior at his press conference?

P – Well there’s many things about him. I just… I… first of all, I didn’t understand why all of a sudden there’s 26 bodies and then there’s no coroner or doctor who’s looked at the bodies and they’re declared dead. And then all of a sudden the coroner comes out and everybody says that there was an automatic gun or a handgun that was used, and the coroner, on his own, comes out and says ‘Oh no, that was an AR-15 that was used.’

So there’s a lot of confusion, you know, about that coroner, his report, his reporting out. Nothing seems very clear and concise to me. And you know I would argue that, you know, as I looked at him and watched what was going on, he seemed to be just answering question on the fly without a lot of knowledge behind the questions.

S – And this suggested to you that this was a sloppily created event?

P – Absolutely.

S – And would you say that that was because of the portent of the whole thing that they… there were people involved in this… let’s say Dr. Carver, the coroner, who had some idea, if it was a scripted event, it was going to go big, and really big? So do you think that the sloppiness of it was because in being organized, it’s very difficult to juggle how people are going to perform given that they know how big this thing could get?

P – Well, you know, what happens is that you… if you’re going to do these things and carry it through with the lie, everybody’s got to be telling the same lie at the same time all the time.

And I think with my judgments about the parents and the kids, and seeing them lie, I was seeing a big lie being perpetrated right in front of me because nothing seemed to be consistent. And like you said, which I thought was interesting, is that oftentimes the media would fill in a lot of the blanks for you.

A classic example of the blanks comes up when you talk about where are the kids that are evacuating the school. There were helicopters that were circling overhead. They certainly would have been able to show, you know, hundreds of kids exiting the school.
That was never shown. But you did see a picture out in a parking lot, which by the way if you take a long look at this picture of all these kids being led out, about 15 or 20 kids being led out by teachers and adults from this parking lot, if you take a look at the parking lot from the aerial views, you can see that there are different cars in the parking lot in that area. So obviously that was done during some sort of drill. That’s my opinion. And it didn’t match with what was going on at the time. So nothing is matching in real time for me. That’s just another thing.

But where are the kids? Where were the kids? They weren’t present. They just weren’t there. So that’s the kind of stuff that wasn’t worked out and, you know, they were doing things on the fly. That’s why I say… I would say it was very amateur, very amateurish as to what was going on.

S – Which is surprising because in the powers that would have designed this thing – that it would be so amateur – but…

You are familiar with the character, Gene Rosen?

P – Gene Rosen – which one was …?

YouTube – Veterans Today –

S – Gene Rosen was the man who was very close to the school and he took the kids in and offered them juice and cookies, and he gave many different… he recounted his rescuing or fielding these kids differently in many interviews. So can you comment on that?

P – I can comment on this because this points to this proves my point that these kids… did they get off a bus? Where did they go? OK, I think that one of the stories was that the kids got off the bus and they made their way to his house, and there was all this panic or whatever was going on. OK, there’s something really wrong with that picture to begin with.

First of all, when you’re doing these scenarios and this school had to have been trained for this because FEMA requires these trainings, and if you’re getting safety monies from the federal government, which every school does, they have to follow the proper protocols and that’s the proper release of the students to their parents.

S – Right. He said, that children showed up on his lawn and they were with a bus driver, in one story. In another story, they were just there by themselves and they were repeating babbling that there teacher was dead. So what…would the protocol be that the children…the children, according to the story, left the school on their own.

P – Well, that to me, that’s very suspicious in and of itself.

S – Right, I mean the cops had not gotten there in the first five minutes. Apparently some of them could still hear shooting going on, and how did the kids get out and just run down the road, you know?

P – All that seems to be… and again, I want to go into the thing about the incident command system, evacuation, walk-outs and so on. None of that fits that protocol. None of it.

The story of Gene Rosen or any of that stuff – None of that fits. That to me is just more evidence that there were no students other than the actor students that were there.

S – Then what was the purpose of having the Gene Rosen player?

P – Diversion.

S – From what?

P – A diversion from the other realities going on and to add more hype about the story. It’s the same thing about the guy that was chased through the woods. You know, they had a couple of guys that were chased through the woods. What were they all about?

YouTube – Veterans Today –

And there were no answers about any of that, about where they came from and even my people couldn’t come up with an answer about that. Some of my people say it was very sloppily done.

S – These are your insider people, right?

P – Right.

S – Now did you see any of the videos of the people circling through the firehouse?

P – Yes.

S – And did that strike you… what did you think of that?

P – Well, I had already come to my conclusion that this was a drill, and again, being very suspicious of the Obama administration, Diane Feinstein, Second Amendment issues, using Agenda 21 in particular, I had not see that for quite some time afterwards, maybe a couple of weeks after.

We were engaged in our own things that we were doing in terms of investigations and stuff like that. We’re pretty intense about what we’re doing here on Agenda 21 Radio, and we have some very highly placed sources of information that comes to us and which we’re very grateful for.

I, for one reason or another, hadn’t seen that video maybe two or three weeks until after the incident.

There’s more evidence right there because what in the world were all those people doing there to begin with? You see, if you’re doing an incident command situation, there’s a place for those people and those people can be moved on rather than seeing that circus that was going on, which is what that was. That was all staged.

S – Right. And these were far too many adults, no children whatsoever, no panic. And to me the people that were there-–they weren’t dressed for December. So some people have suggested that that particular drill, the circling in and out of the firehouse, took place a lot earlier, and it matches the time frame and the clothing of the children evacuated from the school. They did not have their coats.

And I was going to ask you, is it normal when there’s an emergency for the teacher to evacuate the children without letting them get their coats, or would they take the extra time and say ‘Children go put your coats on as fast as you can.’ How does that work?

P – Well no. If there’s a signal to get them out of the building – and there’s always a signal of some sort to get them out of the building safely – they go directly out. Period. End of subject

And if they can get their coat, that’s great, but the safety thing is to get them away from where there potentially is a threat and that would be the key thing. And again, you pointed to something else and I brought this up earlier about the drill that we used to run and people would always, you know, screw up the drill because they would knock on the door in an active shooter situation and the teacher would open the door.

Well, you know, how does that all play out? I was looking at things pretty much in real time within minutes of news being broadcast as it was happening from a helicopter. Now I am a real-time kind of guy. So I’m looking at maybe 15 minutes into the shooter, maybe 20 minutes into the shooter situation. I’m looking at clear video of the campus and so on. I’m not seeing anything happening.

Where are the kids? The kids aren’t there.

S – Right.

P – And they should be released or what’s going on with them?

S – And there were some people said that they were in closets for up to four hours. That doesn’t make any sense either.

P – That does not many any sense to me because what happens, and again it goes back to the police, and back to Columbine, they will go in and check every nook and cranny. And quite frankly, I know how that’s done. We used to do that. We always used to look and check to see where people were.

S – Right. And you would not miss large adults hiding in small closets.

And the idea of Katelyn Boyd and some of these teachers bundling up all their kids into the bathroom and having a few sit on the toilet… I even heard the toilet roll holder, my god, that’s pretty tough to do even for a six year old. But what do you think of that? That doesn’t make sense to me.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Sofia Smallstorm, “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 dimensions”

P – Well, you know, we tell people in an active shooter situation to seek… to hide or… if there is a shooter there to take the challenge. We used to do these things where we had these dummy books and we’d bring in an active shooter as the stage person and throw books at them, you know, because that really throws them off. You’re taught those kinds of little techniques to throw the active shooter off.

But I can imagine some people getting holed up in a closet or something like that if they haven’t been able to lock the door. And that’s one of the things we tell our people all of the time. Lock the door. And we made sure in all schools, and all schools should have the, the doors should have the inside key on them, you know, so you can use an inside key on them also as we could on the outside.

S – So we have a couple of minutes left at this first hour. Do you have anything to say about Adam Lanza – fiction, non-fiction, real?

P – Well, just on the surface of it – and again I would throw out I’m highly specialized trained in drugs and alcohol recognition – obviously looks like he has some meds onboard just by the look. But you know if you couch that along the same lines that that this may be a fictional event, that he’s a fictional character, which fits his description of what I see there.

And of course if you’re doing a fictionalized event like this, you want to have the most crazed individual that you can have looking at you through the picture there, and that’s exactly what you have. That’s my speculation. I think that’s what they wanted. That’s what they did.

And he has a history and what is the history? We’re not real clear on the history. You know, first of all, they found out that he’s got his brother’s driver’s license. Then there’s some confusion. And you know it one of these kind of scenarios that just didn’t quite fit.

And as a school person that to me was one of the big pieces of evidence. Why does he have his brother’s license? And then they made contact his brother that I guess was in Jersey some place, wherever he was, and there was an investigation. That all seemed to be tracking with me as a distraction about what was really happening at the school.
Click here: “Conspiracy Analyst: Does Adam Lanza even exist?”

See, the more they under this situation… this is just my speculation – the more they could distract from the actual Sandy Hook school site itself and stage things away from there, the more they could sell the story of Sandy Hook on the whole.

S – That’s a very very good point, Paul. Excellent. And we should add that the mug shot that they gave us of Adam Lanza was very painterly. It wasn’t even a photo, and it did have that, you know, ghoulish expression on it to make us think this is a real lunatic.

But we are now at the end of our first hour and I really really thank you, Paul Preston, for being with us. And we will take up a second hour discussion in the Members Section. So this is Sofia Smallstorm thanking everyone for listening to this first hour and please do come to and join us for the second hour in the Members Section with Paul Preston, 41 years in the public schools and someone who has been through a lot of staging of drills and has a lot of drill understanding and experience.

Read More: Click here to Read Full Article and watch videos

Seattle TV Will Wilson interviews JB Campbell and Stew Webb


Seattle Television Will Wilson interviews J.B. Campbell and Stew Webb (1 hour)

JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist

Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today

Stew Webb Youtube

To those Truth tellers I am carrying my load are you?

Would you consider a small donation to help support the cause?

January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:

Stew Webb Founder

Recall Your Congress and Senate

The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!

JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved


McMartin Preschool Pedophilia Case: Mother targeted by FBI Ted Gunderson

McMartin Picture

By Stew Webb

During the 1980’s, the McMartin preschool trial was ongoing scandal that never seemed to end. Members of the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in California, were charged with numerous acts of sexual abuse of children in their care. Accusations were made in 1983. Arrests and the pretrial investigation ran from 1984 to 1987, and the trial ran from 1987 to 1990. After six years of criminal trials, no convictions were obtained, and all charges were dropped in 1990. When the trial ended in 1990 it had been the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history.

Most of the public ended up with the impression that no actual sexual abuse of children actually occurred at all, that all the accusations and long prosecution over several years was just a byproduct of societal hysteria against rumors of satanic ritual abuse of children.

This public belief at the time could not have been further from the truth.

Truth is often much stranger than common societal beliefs and in this case of the McMartin Preschool Scandal, that is certainly the case. Why you might ask?  The answer is simply that years later newly emerging evidence has shown without question that serious sexual abuse of children did occur at the McMartin Preschool, much of it was done in specially dug tunnels where children were subjected to satanic ritual sexual abuse.

As with any traumatic abuse of children sexual or otherwise, the young victims often suffer from shock, memory loss and confusion that any parent figure would mistreat them. A very sophisticated coverup was put in place, using a stalling strategy to drag the prosecutions out and to diffuse and muddle up any real evidence, while blocking any serious attempt to fully investigate the case. Only later on wee the tunnels dug up providing real evidence of the satanic ritual sexual abuse of the children.

And even after the trial ended. The efforts to coverup the evidence continued, being run by the FBI as just another cointelpro type action. And who was assigned to deliver this ongoing cointelpro? None other than defrocked, fired former LA FBI SAC Ted Gunderson.

Here is a description of how Ted Gunderson tried to keep the McMartin case covered up.

This is a story that needs to be told and a follow up on my two previous articles AIPAC and Abramoff Operated Child Sex Blackmail Ring and The Octopus Nothing is Secret about Murder for Hire schemes, Illegal incarcerations, Murder, Child sex rings and those who have made claims that where out and out lies about their own reputations. FBI Ted Gunderson had sex with 12 year old at Satanic Ritual in 1972

One such creature was former FBI-CIA Agent Ted Gunderson, a cover up artist for the AIPAC Bush Organized Crime Syndicate.

Let’s examine some more evidence of the fictitious claims Gunderson made to infiltrate Whistleblowers, talk show hosts, witnesses, victims of Satanic abuse and the Patriot community-Truth tellers.

Recently Ted Gunderson’s criminal cohorts have surfaced trying to slander this Whistleblowers reputation calling in talk shows and bringing up Gunderson’s dirty name.

I know it is to burn up my time and try and discredit me on various radio shows and resurrect a dead Pedophile’s reputation all because of one video tape on the internet where Ted Gunderson interviewed CIA Whistleblower Gene “Chip” Tatum, at a Florida convention in 1997.  Ted Gunderson had no reputation except that of a Bush Organized Crime Stooge, he would do interviews of a few known Whistleblowers to give himself credentials in the True movement so he could identify others and report back to his superiors at the FBI and CIA who paid him for the names of those he collected.

We need to first examine the fictions on Gunderson’s resume to get to some more facts about the scamsters and con artists and Trolls to understand how FBI-DHS-AIPAC Cointel Pro operatives work. If you will examine the author and lecturer section carefully Gunderson, tries to make one think he was the investigator on the McMartin Preschool (Nahattan Beach, CA.) which is a total lie.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Jacque McGauley letter to Ted L. Gunderson

Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:23

Ted Gunderson,

Fifteen years after I kick you out of my house I am still receiving creditor calls trying to collect your overdue bills! It is yet another telephone bill and the rent for your so called “Office” which is really a SMALL post office box on Wilshire Boulevard in Santa Monica.
You do not have a physical address or I would have served you a subpoena long ago.

Don’t the gold bars you stole from Mary and Ken Scheibe of Las Vegas cover your bills?

Quit telling everyone the condo you stole from the Scheibe’s is yours!

And you have some phony video for sale about MY case that you had NOTHING to do with!
And you are selling my Tunnel Report from the McMartin Preschool case.

You are NOT authorized to sell that report.

I doubt you have the real report anyway.

I own that report and have the legal papers to prove it.

The next time you hear from me it will be through my lawyers!

Get all of my stuff OFF the Internet and where ever else you have it for sale or I will SUE you!

You have built a totally FAKE reputation out of blatant lies and fallacies you just dreamed up.

But the worst of it is the MONEY you embezzle from people-vulnerable victims and worse-defenseless old people.

How can one Con artist reap so much destruction and his victims don’t act?

If you are a victim of ted l. gunderson’s so called investigative services and other scams…write to me. It is way past time to go after him!

And be warned, STOP selling material you stole from me!!!!!
Jacque McGauley

The McMartin Tunnel Drawing from Jackie McGauley


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Click on Document above to Enlarge:

From: Jacque Mcguley McMartin Preschool Mother & Whistleblower




McMartin Preschool Case,   Government Plant CIA Ted L. Gunderson


Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:40:51 EDT


This is all OK, but I would rather   not make all of my public appearances
public anymore. I took all of that off the top of my head and it may not be
accurate to the nth degree and I would not want anyone coming after me for
that…Could you take off all that stuff? I’d appreciate it.
Thanks, JackieTelevision appearances:
Good Morning America, KNX 1984 special, no other guests, Hollywood
CART, emergency care givers conference, Long Beach
Connie Chung news magazine show, New York
Maria Shriver, NBC, news magazine show, New York
Kelly And Company, Detroit, Michigan
KCET Public Broadcasting public service announcement
MacNeil/Lehrer interview with Michael Kay
MacNeil Lehrer, special on McMartin case after trial, Ilyce Meckler
Oprah Winfrey Show, 1984
Maurey Povich Show 1992
Geraldo Show,
Geraldo Show Interview, Manhattan Beach
Geraldo ABC special
Now It Can Be Told, Geraldo
Hard Copy
Inside Edition
Sally Jesse Raphael
20/20, news magazine,
48 hours
Fifth Estate, Canada
TV special on Child Abuse, The Netherlands
ABC News
NBC News
CBS News
KTTV news
KTTV special reports
KLOS radioTom Lykis Show
ABC Radio, Ray Breem, twice
ABC Radio, Michael Jackson
KABC Radio Gloria Allred Show
KABC Radio Steve Edwards
KFWB News RadioConferences:
Affirming Children’s Truths Conference 1985 (Jan Hollingsworth, Dr Roland
Sunny Von Bulow Foundation, ACT, Believe the Children conference 1983
Ontario, California Police Conference on Ritual Abuse
National Organization for Women
APSAC-San Diego
APSAC San Diego with Gary Stickel
Eugene, Oregon annual conference (have to look up the exact title)?
North Carolina Police conference, Wilmington, NC
San Francisco NACCP Conference, Excellence in Children’s Law, co speaker with
Dr Summit
USC Presentation to Journalism students
UCLA presentation to Archaeological studentsPrint Media:
Lear’s Magazine
People Magazine
L.A. Times
Herald Examiner
Beach Reporter, Local Newspaper
Easy Reader, Local Newspaper
Daily Breeze, South Bay (So. CA) newspaper
Emergency Room Magazine
San Jose Mercury News
San Jose Mercury News Magazine (Sunday Supplement)
San Francisco Chronicle, special report
Boston Globe
New York Times
Random Lengths
Long Beach Press Telegram
Courage to Heal, second edition
Tim Tate, Children for the Devil, England
Treating Abuse today
Journal of Psychohistory
SMARTNEWS, personal interviewAcknowledged by
Jan Hollingsworth, Florida, Author Unspeakable Acts, book and TV movie
Kathleen Fallor,MD
John E.B. Myers, JD
David Finkelhor, MD, New Hampshire Ritual abuse study 1986
David Chadwick, MD, San Diego
Roland Summit, MD, UCLA
Gail Goodman, Cathy Snow, Robert Geffin, studies on RA
Ken Wooden, Child Lures
John Walsh and Jay Howell, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Mike Durfee, MD,L.A. Health Dept
Stephen Kay, Head District Attorney, Los Angeles
Joe Klass-Polly Klass’ Grandfather
Gloria Steinam
Gloria Allred
Susan Kelley
Claire Reeves, MASA
Outstanding Service to Children award, 1987Memberships
ACT, Affirming Children’s Truths-creator, produced conferences
Charter Board Member of Believe the Children
Coalition of Victim’s Equal Rights, charter board member(COVER), Doris Tate,
pres. now run by the United States Justice Department
ISSMPD honorary member
APSAC American Professional Society on the abuse of children


Official statement of the AMA on False Memory

I have been asked many times to provide a copy of the official statement of
the AMA on False Memory
This is a valuable paper to have in any argument regarding this issue.

Jackie McGauley McMartin Preschool Mother & Whistleblower

Recognition of the Reality of Dissociative Amnesia: Statements by
Professional Organizations
Most major associations that have examined this issue recognize that full
or partial forgetting of genuine memories of abuse can occur.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV)

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-VI) recognizes
memory problems to be a common feature of five post-traumatic conditions:
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Dissociative Amnesia, Dissociative Fugue, Dissociative Disorder Not-Otherwise-Specified, and Dissociative Identity Disorder.
Code No. 300.12 (Dissociative Amnesia) “Dissociative amnesia is characterized
by an inability to recall important personal information, usually of a
traumatic or stressful nature, that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary
forgetfulness…. The reported duration of the events for which there is amnesia
may be minutes to years. . . . Some individual with chronic amnesia may
gradually begin to recall dissociated memories” (pp. 478-9).
Code No. 300.14 (Dissociative Identity Disorder): “Individuals with this
disorder experience frequent gaps in memory for personal history, both remote and
recent. . . . There may be loss of memory not only for recurrent periods of
time, but also an overall loss of biographical memory for some extended period
of childhood” (pp. 484-5).

World Health Organization, International Classification of Diseases, 9th
Revision (ICD-9)

See Code Nos. 300.12 (Psychogenic amnesia; hysterical amnesia); 300.14
(Multiple personality, dissociative identity disorder; 300.15 (Dissociative disorder
or reaction, unspecified)

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the National Center for
Health Satistics, International Classification of Diseases, DHHS Pub. No. (PHS_

See Code Nos. 300.12 (Psychogenic amnesia; hysterical amnesia); 300.14
(Multiple personality, dissociative identity disorder; 300.15 (Dissociative disorder
or reaction, unspecified)

American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. (1994). Memories
of Childhood Abuse. CSA Report 5-A-94. Chicago: Author.
This statement was formulated in response to the growing concern regarding
memories of sexual abuse. The validity of some memories of sexual abuse, as
well as some of the therapeutic techniques which have been used have been
debated. The APA states that it is concerned that the passionate debates about these
issues have obscured the recognition of a body of scientific evidence that
underlies widespread agreement among psychiatric treatment in this area. “We are
especially concerned that the public confusion and dismay over this issue and
the possibility of false accusations not discredit the reports of patients
who have indeed been traumatized by actual previous abuse.”
Major points:

* Sexual abuse of children and adolescents lead to severe negative
consequences and is a risk factor for the development of many classes of psychiatric
* Children who have been abused cope with the trauma by using a variety of
psychological mechanisms. “These coping mechanisms may result in the lack of
conscious awareness of the abuse for varying periods of time. Conscious
thoughts and feelings stemming from the abuse may emerge at a later date.”
* Human memory is a complex process about which there is a substantial base
of scientific knowledge.
* Implicit and explicit memory are two different forms of memory. This
distinction between explicit and explicit memory is fundamental because they have
been shown to be supported by different brain systems.
* “Some individuals who have experienced documented traumatic events may
nevertheless include some false or inconsistent elements in their reports. In
addition, hesitancy in making a report, and recanting following the report, can
occur in victims of documented abuse. Therefore, these seemingly contradictory
findings do not exclude the possibility that the report is based on a true
* Memories can be significantly influenced by questioning especially in
young children.
* There is no completely accurate way of determining the validity of
reports in the absence of corroborating information.
* Advises “an empathic, nonjudgmental, neutral stance towards reported
memories of sexual abuse.”
* Psychiatrists are urged to base their treatment plan on a complete
psychiatric assessment and the full range of the client’s clinical needs. “A strong
prior belief by the psychiatrist that sexual abuse, or other factors, are or
are not the cause of the patient’s problems is likely to interfere with
appropriate assessment and treatment.”
* Many individuals who have experienced sexual abuse have a history of not
being believed by their parents, or others in whom they have put their trust.
Expression of disbelief is likely to cause the patient further pain and
decrease his/her willingness to seek needed psychiatric treatment. Similarly,
clinicians should not exert pressure on patients to believe in events that may not
have occurred, or make other important decisions based on these speculations.”
* The intensity of debate about these topics should not influence
psychiatrists to abandon their commitment to basic principles of ethical practice.
Notes that psychiatrists should refrain from making public statements about the
veracity or other features of individual reports of sexual abuse.

See: Report on memories of childhood abuse. American Medical Association
Council on Scientific Affairs. (1995, April). International Journal of Clinical &
Experimental Hypnosis, 43(2), 114-7.
American Psychological Association, Working Group on Investigation of
Memories of Childhood Abuse: Final Report (1996)
(issued on February 14, 1996)
Final conclusions included:

1. Controversies regarding adult recollections should not be allowed to
obscure the fact that child sexual abuse is a complex and pervasive problem in
America that has historically gone unacknowledged.
2. Most people who were sexually abused as children remember all or part of
what happened to them.
3. It is possible for memories of abuse that have been forgotten for a long
time to be remembered.
4. It is also possible to construct convincing pseudomemories for events
that never occurred.
5. There are gaps in our knowledge about the processes that lead to accurate
and inaccurate recollections of childhood abuse.

See also:

Questions & Answers About Memories of Childhood Abuse

British Psychological Society, Report of the Working Group on Recovered
Memories. (1995). Recovered memories. Leicester, UK: Author.
Executive Summary
The working party was charged with reporting on the scientific evidence
relevant to the current debate concerning Recovered Memories of Trauma and with
commenting on the issues surrounding this topic. After reviewing the scientific
literature, surveying relevant members of the British Psychological Society,
and scrutinizing the records of the British False Memory Society, the formed the
following conclusions:

1. Complete or partial memory loss is a frequently reported consequence of
experiencing certain kinds of psychological traumas including childhood sexual
abuse. These memories are sometimes fully or partially recovered after a gap
of many years.
2. Memories may be recovered within or independent of therapy. Memory
recovery is reported by highly experienced and well qualified therapists who are
well aware of the dangers of inappropriate suggestion and interpretation.
3. In general, the clarity and detail of event memories depends on a number
of factors, including the age at which the even occurred. Although clear
memories are likely to be broadly accurate, they may contain significant errors.
It seems likely that recovered memories have the same properties.
4. Sustained pressure or persuasion by an authority figure could lead to the
retrieval or elaboration of ‘memories’ of events that never actually
happened. The possibility of therapists creating in their clients false memories of
having been sexually abused in childhood warrants careful consideration, and
guidelines for therapists are suggested here to minimize the risk of this
happening. There is no reliable evidence at present that this is a widespread
phenomenon in the UK.
5. In a recent review of the literature on recovered memories, Lindsay and
Read commented that “the ground for debate has shifted from the question of the
possibility of therapy-induced false beliefs to the question of the
prevalence of therapy-induced false beliefs.” We agree with this comment but add to it
that the ground for debate has also shifted from the question of the
possibility of recovery of memory from total amnesia to the question of the prevalence
of recovery of memory from totally amnesia.

A copy of this report can be obtained from:
The British Psychological Society
48, Princess Road East
Leicester LE1 7DR
United Kingdom

International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). (1997, June).
Childhood Trauma Remembered: A Report on the Current Scientific Knowledge Base
and Its Applications for Professionals. Northbrook, Illinois: Author. (Details
and Order Form)

This document addresses childhood trauma, traumatic memory, the memory
process, clinical issues and forensic implications pertaining to the ongoing debate
on this subject.
International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies also recognizes
dissociative amnesia in their practice guidelines for the treatment of post-traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD). See: Foa, E. B., Keane, T. M., Friedman, M. J. (Eds.).
(1999).Effective Treatments for PTSD: Practice Guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Northbrook, Illinois: International
Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. (Available from their website at

State of Kentucky, Attorney General’s Final Report of the Task Force on Child
Sexual Abuse (1995)

In reviewing this issue, the Task Force looked at research studies which
revealed that up to 60% of child sexual abuse survivors report incomplete, or a
total absence of, abuse-specific memories at some point after victimization.
Research has also shown that this type of delayed recall is often associated with
more violent and terrorizing cases of abuse.
See also, Governor’s Office of Child Sexual Abuse and Domestic Violence
Services. Myths and Realities about Child Sexual Abuse

The Leadership Council
Please contact our Webmaster with questions or comments.
© Copyright 2002 Leadership Council, Inc. All rights reserved

Search WWW Search

Jacque Subpena to testify in the McMartin Pre-Schools Case


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Ted L. Gunderson embezzled over $30,000 from me.

By: Jackie McGauley

McMartin Preschool Mother/Whistleblower
18 November 2003


Why are those who seek to reveal the antics of an obvious crook being silenced?

I can, and have, documented that Ted L. Gunderson embezzled over $30,000 from me.

I know a large number of people he has also taken large amounts of money from.

I know many people from whom Ted takes credit for their work. I have names, I have talked to these people.

Better yet, check the Hall of Records in any County he has been in for all of the lawsuits that have been filed against him. It boggles the mind.

I can document that he lies about his accomplishments, on his resume.

Why was he SAC of the FBI in Memphis immediatly after the Martin Luther King assasination?

In Dallas immediately after the John F. Kennedy assasination and Los Angeles immediatley after the Robert Kennedy assasination?

Is this a coincidence?

Do a check on the Department of consumer Affairs for his PI license.

I checked, it was not there.

Why did he file bankruptcy in 1983 and dissolve his company ‘Ted L. Gunderson and Associates’?

My case, The McMartin Preschool Case, where hundreds of children were molested, is a laughing stock because of the stupid lies Ted is allowed to broadcast.

Is that how he “helps” children?

He DID NOT “work” the McMartin case.
He DID NOT “work” the Klaas case.
He DID use a team of psychics on the MacDonald case.
He DID spend his own money to do his own investigation then demand compensation.

How many other cases is he claiming he was hired on when he was not?

I have letters from a psychic, Fred Hanson, proving that Ted was head of security at the U.S. Olympics for Hanson’s group of -PSYCHICS- United Sensitives of America (USA).

Ted runs a clinic is Tiajuana, Mexico that has claimed to cure not only glaucoma, cancer, arthritis, Alzheimer’s, autism but now Mongoloidism, too!

Tiajuana is just south of Palm Springs where old people go to retire-they are his main target.

He is a con man-pure and simple.

Why isn’t he in jail?

Why do people keep referring to him as an expert on Satanism?

How is this helping the Peterson case?

The same as it did my case?

Look up the history on Cointel Pro, Counter Intelligence Program.

Just look at his idiot.

His Ex wife, Jocelyn told me Ted was diagnoses paranoid schizophrenic.
His son, Ted L. Gunderson Junior is severely psychotic and must be on strong medication.

A malady that seems to run in his family.

Doesn’t this smack of QUACK to you?

Check the site “” for information on Sierra Clinics which Ted was a partner.

Then there is the “gold Mine” Shaloko, then there is the Anglo-American Management Corp. where Ted was going to import English, then Swedish nurses to the U.S.

He asked me to put one up in my spare room in 1990.

I could go on and on…and so could many others who have been scammed by him.

Why is this crook being “protected” now that others are saying what they know?

How many more vulnerable people will lose their hard earned money to this carpetbagger?

Jacque McGauley


June 16, 2002 Radio Interview Stew Webb & Jacque McGauley Guests

It is a must hear archived in 2 days at

The Floyd Report with Jeremy Floyd.

CIA Ted Gunderson Patriot Spy, topic of discussion.

Jacque McGauley, McMartin Preschool Fame tells all, how

Ted Gunderson drove her to bankrupts, forged her signature on her credit cards and forgery of others signatures on her credit cards totaling over $10,000.

Ted Gunderson ran up $20,000 in phone bills and never paid a dime.

How Ted Gunderson Claims he paid for the tunnel dig, and never did and forged his Income Tax Return by writing off the dig. (IRS ALERT)

How Ted Gunderson and his Sierra Clinic steal and kill little old ladies, then steal from their estate.

How Ted Gunderson robbed the estate of Mary & Ken Schibe of Las Vegas,

then Ken Schibe was suffocated.

Shortly before the suffocation Ted Gunderson took $3 million

in Gold bars from Ken Schibe’s Bank Box.

The family claims Ted Gunderson stole the $3 million.

Stew’s investigation shows CIA Ted Gunderson was caught stealing $150,000

more from the Scribe estate and was ordered to repay the estate at $1,500.00

per month from Gunderson’s $62,500.00 a year FBI early retirement.

Now Gunderson’s partner in crime controls the Schibe estate because Mary suffers from Alzheimer’s.Gunderson was let go from the FBI for holding satanic ceremonies in his FBI offices in 1979.

Further Jacque discussed Gunderson’s involvement with Michael Riconosciuto

and the Cabazon/Wackenhut Indian reservation in Indio, California and how ABC news

reporter Danny Casalaro was killed shortly after contacting Gunderson and Riconosciuto.

Ted Gunderson Income Tax Evasion Frauds

Ted Gunderson income tax evasion where Gunderson wrote off $9,080.00.00 of his income tax the McMartin Preschool dig that Gunderson never paid a dime. Jacque McGauley got a donation from a Christian Minister who paid the dig. (Gunderson Fraud)


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Ted Gunderson broke Jacque McGauley’s finger threatening her to keep her mouth shut about the McMartin case. McGauley was a mother of one of the children at the preschool and then reported what was going on to the Police.

Gunderson also had poisoned Jacque McGauley


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Ted Gunderson illegally used Jacque McGauleys social security number and signed her name and used her mail box and never paid the bill. (Fraud and theft)


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Ted Gunderson steals Jacque McGauley’s credit cards and runs up $30,000.00 worth of debt. (Fraud and theft)


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

The Notorious Scamster and thief Ted Gunderson has hundreds of victims

Charles Hughes scammed by Ted Gunderson like hundreds of others this Whistleblower and author has boxes of evidence on FBI-CIA Ted Gunderson’s crimes.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Charles Hughes answers Ted Gunderson


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

We need to do a second examine the fictions on Gunderson’s resume to get to some more facts about the scamsters and con artists and Trolls to understand how FBI-DHS-AIPAC Cointel Pro operatives work. If you will examine Gunderson’s  resume states; the 1984 LOS ANGELES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE Consultant on international terrorism & security matters.

This was another lie on Ted Gunderson’s resume.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Did Ted Gunderson Murder Rick Post? Ted Gunderson was mad because I shared research with Rick, he wanted it all for himself.—Jacque McGauley

McMartin Preschool Case the Rick Post Murder?

Feb. 12, 2003

From: Jackie McGuley

To: Stew Webb

I worked closely with Rick Post in the late 80’s. Ted Gunderson was mad because I shared research with Rick, he wanted it all for himself.

Rick was murdered in Mexico at a “medical clinic” I am curious if it was Sierra Clinic.(With ties to Ted Gunderson)


A Case of Foul Play

A Case of Foul Play Private investigator Richard Post disappeared more than three years ago. Believed dead, he left a confusing trail of deceit and broken hearts. But as
his wild case heads toward federal court, one of his alleged kidnappers
claims he’s still alive. Will the real story ever be known?

By Kevin Cox

It was a tough spot, but if anyone could talk his way out of it, it was
Richard Carl Post. Two men posing as Mexican cops kidnapped Post in front of
a Tijuana pharmacy on a summer day in 1998. They took him to an abandoned
house and duct-taped him to a chair in a shower stall.
Post was one of San Diego’s most notorious private investigator”52 years
old, tall and thin, with dark hair and eyes.

Handsome, in a rugged, manly sort of way, Post looked like a private investigator. Like Magnum, P.I., without the mustache.
He could talk a broad out of her skivvies in Main Street,another private investigator says of Post.
But on this day, one of Posts former girlfriends allegedly was also one of his kidnappers. An affidavit filed in the case by an FBI agent identifies her as Janet Fleming, and describes what happened next.
She used pliers and squeezed Posts fingers as a form of torture, the
affidavit says. Then one of the other kidnappers took the pliers, and pinched Posts fingernails.

Post screamed in pain through the duct tape and then was allowed to appeal to Fleming.
Post asked her why she was doing this to him, and was inquiring if it was because of the other women.

Fleming advised that was not the reason, but it was simply because he had stolen money from her.
No one has seen Post since then. His body has never been found. Many doubt it
ever will be. One source believes Post was killed Mexican style and parted
out like a stolen car. He was chopped up, and they weren’t worried about anybody ever finding him.
With no body, police at first considered Post just another missing person.
His family filed the usual report to open a case with San Diego Police. But
they also had some evidence: love letters from Fleming to Post.
“I am just so deeply in love with you … you’re all I can think of,  a source quotes from the letters. She was really … obsessed with him, the source says.

But she found out that he really wasn’t romancing her.

He was going after her wallet.
Posts attorney, Joseph Dicks, did not respond to interview requests.
Those who knew Post say they are not surprised he disappeared mysteriously.
He was pretty well known for being a sleaze guy, hanging around with the
wrong crowd, says a San Diego lawyer. I just cannot imagine him coming to a
good end anywhere in life.
Posts story offers a different view of San Diego, one that does not show up
in the picture postcards. It’s a story of sex, scams and shady characters.
It’s a story with famous and infamous names: Dr. Deepak Chopra, the
world-renowned author and lecturer from La Jolla, and Svetlana Orgorodnikova,
a convicted Russian spy.
While most private investigators work their cases quietly ”they’re private
investigators, after all ”Post was always drawing attention to himself.
That’s how he met Chopra. Or more accurately, Chopra’s lawyers.

In court documents, they accuse Post of trying to shake down Chopra. They say Post was behind a sexual harassment lawsuit against Chopra, filed by a woman named
Joyce Weaver.
In 1995, Post and Weaver plotted together to fabricate a lawsuit, court
documents say.

That same year, Chopra’s lawyers accused Post of arranging the theft of confidential legal documents from their law firm. The lawyers alleged Post was working for one of San Diego’s largest and most prestigious law firms ”Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich” the same firm representing Weaver. So Chopra went after Gray Cary along with Posts” in February 1997.
The case dragged on for three years, until Chopra dropped it. By then, he had
prevailed against Weaver, the woman who had alleged sexual harassment.

After deliberating for less than 10 minutes, according to court documents filed in
that case, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Dr. Chopra and all his companies on all of Weaver’s claims.
The Weaver case was just one lawsuit involving Post. Court files show more
than a dozen civil cases filed against him ”including two divorces and a paternity suit. There were several judgments against him, including one for more than $22,000. According to documents filed in that case, Post passed off a reproduction as an original Diego Rivera painting.
The court files also tell his life story. In the 1970s, he was a construction worker and a deck hand on a sport-fishing boat. One file notes Post was claiming that he was in Army intelligence when he was in the Army … for a two-year period of time.
By 1982, Post was sounding like a real spy. He has frequently eluded [sic] that he works for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to his first wife.
Years later, Post told another private investigator an incredible story about
working with the CIA to kidnap the leaders of a Mexican drug cartel.

The CIA and I are putting together a, ah, thing, another private investigator
quotes Post as saying, to pay off the Arellano brothers jet pilot. And
were gonna get the Arellano brothers and put em on the airplane and gas em and bring [them] up here to the United States.
Some people dont believe any of it. But they’re cautious about saying so.
They’ll talk about Post, but they don’t want their names used.

He was a wanna-be, a guy who watched too many Bond movies, a lawyer says.

He wanted everybody to think he was the big shot, the mystery guy with the heavy
connections. I don’t buy that s— for a minute.
For a secret agent, Posts life was proceeding in a very public way. In a December 1991 issue of The San Diego Weekly Reader, Post is quoted extensively in an article about Satanic cults. He even goes hunting for Satanists in East County ”with a 12-gauge shotgun and a Bowie knife” but doesn’t find any.
That doesn’t stop him from hinting darkly about vast conspiracies of devil worshipping. There are some local elected officials involved, but he won’t name them, the Reader article says.
I have a feeling that no one is doing anything about it, the article quotes Post as saying. I couldn’t turn my back on it.
There are some people who literally swear by Posts sincerity. In a deposition filed in Chopra’s case, a female witness describes the day she met Post.
He entered my world very softly, she testified. And all I can remember from that time period, in talking with him, is that he was like a little angel who came to my door, because he was just so kind and so real, and gentle.
His energy was just so wonderful. I really, really enjoyed his company, and
I don’t know really what we talked about. I had a very stressful day, and he was like a gift … of fresh air.
Women loved Post, and he loved them. But sometimes, he loved more than one at
a time.
In 1997, Janet Fleming hired Post to investigate employee theft at her
company. According to documents filed in federal court, Fleming sold black
boxes, machines she claimed emitted electromagnetic waves that could cure a variety of diseases.
People across the country were buying them. Prices started at $1,400.
Business was so good there were reportedly several offices around San Diego
to handle the packaging and shipping. In six months, one office did more than
$1 million in sales.
Post took advantage of Fleming, a source says. He saw the nice little dollar
figure in her eyes, and concentrated on romancing her.
Fleming was a mystery woman, according to sources. She had at least three
different photo IDs, saying she was 5-foot-8 and 135 pounds, or 5-foot-10 and
The photos are all different, too. According to someone who’s seen them,
Fleming is wearing no makeup, then some makeup.

Straight brown hair, then fluffy and curled.

The IDs say she was born in 1958, 1959 or 1963. She also used at least three different names: Janet Fleming, Kimberly Bailey and Kimberly Davis.
The feds were finding out a lot about Janet Fleming. The Food & Drug Administration started investigating her business. Fleming and Post started getting nervous.
They were both aware the feds were looking at them, a source says.

They had planned to shut down the business … and take the money and go vacation
someplace. They would leave separately, so his disappearance didn’t seem
unusual. He would go first.
It was August 1998, and Post did go first. But the feds say he didn’t go
voluntarily. Enter John Krueger, Post’s former friend and partner.
Krueger is thin, with dark hair and eyes, like Post. But he was noticeably shorter and a lot younger, in his early 30s. His large forehead helped give him a boyish appearance.
But that was the end of the innocence. FBI agents working the case used an
informant to get to Krueger. He pleaded guilty in October 2001 to plotting to kidnap Post. He cut a deal with the U.S. Attorney’s office in San Diego and agreed to testify against Fleming.
An affidavit describes the following sequence of events, recorded in a
conversation between Krueger and an informant. Krueger told Fleming that Post
was stealing from her company and that he was having affairs with other
women. Post was in big trouble, and not just with Fleming. She had given Post
$10,000 to give to a man named Humberto Iribe, who is believed to have ties
to organized crime in Mexico. But Iribe never got the money.
Just before Post disappeared, Krueger arranged a meeting at Horton Plaza
between Fleming and Iribe. Then Krueger says he received a voicemail from
Fleming, telling him Post had been kidnapped.
The next day, Krueger went to Mexico, where he saw Fleming and Iribe sitting
at a table in a restaurant, laughing. Krueger says he confronted them, and
Iribe told Krueger that Post would not be hurt.
The FBI used another informant to trick Fleming. That woman is Svetlana Orgorodnikova, a Russian spy convicted in the explosive espionage case
involving former FBI agent Richard Miller.

The FBI wired Orgorodnikova with a body recorder. Fleming was recorded saying Iribe told her they had to kill Post because he had seen their faces. When Iribe asked Fleming what she wanted done with Post, Fleming said, Do what you have to do.
And Fleming allegedly wanted to make more people go away. On December 22,
1999, Fleming met with an undercover FBI agent at a San Diego hotel. She believed Krueger and others were trying to kill her. Fleming wanted to kill Krueger and two other men, and gave the undercover agent $10,000 cash.
All I know is there are three people out to get me, and it’s a survival contest, the federal court file quotes Fleming as saying. I will do whatever has to be done to survive. I deserve to live. They don’t. But Fleming told the undercover agent Krueger’s death couldn’t look suspicious, because the feds would quickly blame her. There’s a natural way for John to have an accident … this is the way to do it, she said, according to the
court file.
Then Fleming and the undercover agent talked money. Ten thousand [was] just
a down payment, and he expected to receive $10,000 per body. [She] agreed,
according to the court file.
The FBI arrested Janet Fleming and John Krueger in April 2000 for the murder
of Rick Post. Humberto Iribe was arrested in Mexico. If Krueger is good
enough on the witness stand, the deal says the feds will ask the judge to give him no more than 12 years in prison.
Fleming’s murder trial is scheduled to start June 18 in federal court. Her attorney, Philip Demassa, says Fleming is the victim in this case.
She thinks this was all set up by Krueger and Post, Demassa says.

She doesn’t think anything happened to [Post].
Demassa says Fleming was selling machines to cure cancer ”he calls them
bio frequency devices. And he showed San Diego Magazine a videotape with testimonial after testimonial from people who say the devices cured them of
cancer and other illnesses.
He acknowledges Fleming made millions of dollars by selling the machines.
Fleming gave $30,000 to $40,000 a month to Post, Demassa says. Post and
Krueger started stealing from her. Fleming told Demassa that Post stole 1,000 of the devices from her worth $1.4 million.

It’s not like he’s destitute and disappeared, Demassa says.
And if Post is dead, there are lots of potential suspects, according to Demassa.

He’s an amoral guy. I hate to say anything about someone if he’s
not around, but there’s a serious issue about what’s going on.
A letter from the prosecutor in the case, assistant U.S. Attorney Barbara
Major, may help prove Demassa’s point. Citing uncorroborated FBI evidence,
Major writes that in 1997, Mexican authorities suspected Richard Post was extorting Chinese citizens who were seeking illegal immigration into the U.S., and that he may have co-opted a Mexican intelligence officer in furtherance of his extortion scheme.
The FBI also learned that Mexican authorities wanted to talk to Mr. Post about these activities, and there was a suggestion that violence might be used during questioning.
The U.S Attorney’s office declined to comment on the letter or any other aspect of the case.

Krueger’s attorney was unavailable for comment.
Whatever happened to him, Post was playing a dangerous game. In an April 1999 confidential report on Post’s disappearance, the FBI acknowledges that he was
an informant for the feds, using the code name Jim Green. Citing a San Diego Police investigation, the FBI report says Post may have fled with between half a million and $1 million.
The FBI cut off the relationship with Post, who became just another former source. Given the circumstances … it is recommended this source be discontinued, and the file be placed in closed status, the report concludes.
Demassa says the government has so many problems with its case ”like using an
informant who’s a convicted Russian spy” that the U.S. Attorney’s office is ready to deal. I’ve heard 20 years, Demassa says. I think they’re more comfortable saying she tricked him down there [to Mexico] than she was involved in the murder.
But Fleming won’t take the deal, her attorney says. She claims to have evidence that Post is still alive.
Most believe that’s highly unlikely. Then again, if anyone can come back to life, it’s Richard Carl Post.

Click on Document above to Enlarge:

FBI-CIA-Ted Gunderson’s payment for spying and infiltrating Patriot Jackie McGauley for The Bush Organized Crime Syndicate.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Ted Gunderson’s own admissions “totally unreliable and the FBI says I am a nut.”

Ms. Marsha Thompson

April 29, 1998

Channel 3, WLBT

715 S. Jefferson

Jackson, Miss. 39201

Dear Ms. Thompson,

I enjoyed our short interview at the recent conference. I have been informed that you did not air it because I am “totally unreliable and the FBI says I am a nut.”

I suggest you obtain my research which documents my position and decide for yourself instead of relying on an organization, the FBI, that has been corrupted. I am enclosing a flyer which lists my research, a letter I wrote to FBI agents when I was excluded by them for a meeting with the Texas militia, and my resume.

I was in charge of the FBI Los Angeles Division at the time of my retirement with a $22.5 million dollar budget and more than 700 employees under my command. I assure you I am totally reliable and not a “nut.” Please pass my material to your FBI source. Maybe he will learn something.


Ted L. Gunderson


Ted Gunderson Fails to Investigate Reports of FBI Crimes

From: Geral Sosbee

Sosbee writes for the record on April 30, 2005:
gun indicates on his website that he was chief inspector for the fbi in 1973; in such capacity, gun had the responsibility to investigate sosbee’s reports of fbi crimes during that year. Not only did he fail to perform his duties as chief inspector, he continued thereafter to serve in high level positions in the fbi at a time when sosbee was being harassed for reporting the criminal conduct of numerous fbi agents as set forth in

Note: gun=Ted L. Gunderson

Note: Geral Sosbee is a former FBI Agent, a former Texas Prosecutor and a former Texas Judge.

 Geral Sosbee’s website:


Ted Gunderson was in charge of the Los Angeles FBI when this was going on.

Breaking News 2004

Consider this an open letter to the corrupt criminal cabal, and those conditioned dupes in CIA, ATF, DEA, FBI, LAPD, military, and other agencies.


The suspects who conduct the harassment toward whistleblowers will not change by us publishing this info (harassment) and pleading with them to understand that we are American patriots who love this country. It just shows a sign of weakness in their eyes on our part. No I believe we need to say in response to harassment such as with interference with phone and email, etc.

“So what ass……… Keep it up… you will just make us more determined to keep up the battle for freedom, and someday you will get yours.” What goes around-comes around is surely true. Nearly everyone one of the key people in LAPD (Los Angeles Police Dept.) who harassed me while on LAPD when I was blowing the whistle on illegal CIA drug running, gun smuggling, kidnapping of teen age girls, drugging them and forcing them to prostitute for VIPS aboard your yachts in Marina del Rey, California, crimes of murder, attempted murder of a police officer/detective, using Florida law enforcement in conspiracies to commit murder (whacking your own men) money laundering, bilking investors of savings and loans, and much more; those key LAPD supervisors and corrupt detectives got theirs in various ways. Such as one was beaten up badly in Hollywood while with his girlfriend, a few others were bilked out of about $100,000 by other corrupt white collar criminals, but that is what they get for accepting bribes from Mafia. Still others had their own marriage suffer badly when it was exposed (by me) they were using prostitutes at LAPD parties. Others who attended these parties were local FBI and DEA agents. Yes, I was there too…just to take all of your names for my later report! Hope I didn’t cause you cops and agents too much anxiety. You should not spit into the wind…or have messed with me. What…oh yes I almost forgot that’s when I received death threats from peers and superiors and the threat from one CIA operative… Let’s see my transcript of those threats seems to indicate over thirty threats and by name! You ignorant fools could never figure out I was taping our conversations so many times. And for you good guy FBI agents, I thank two who will remain unnamed, who instructed me as to how to turn so called illegal evidence, including tape recordings, into legal evidence. Thanks guys-it did work at least for part of my purposes.

Regarding my many allegations, others, including very high officials, were at least forced to retire earlier than they had wanted…due to my allegations. Can you believe that one high official in LAPD had the audacity and was so ignorant, that he had flyers put up all over the city announcing his retirement party at a known Mafia hotel/restaurant! Someone eventually advised him to change it to somewhere else since I had already made allegations about LAPD officials covering up Mafia crime, naming various names including this official.

I thank my honest immediate superiors who wrote in my annual rating reports that “He is second to no one in investigations.

” Wasn’t that difficult to explain to the public when you (corrupt high officials) attempted to discredit me.

I believe that I rattled some cages from LA to Washington, D.C., possibly as the most stubborn and tenacious flea on the dog’s back.

I don’t regret anything. I only suffered for six years and then won my lifetime tax free disability pension along with six years back pay.

I thank the ass…….. for allowing me to pay cash for my farm/ranch after that six year wait which woke me from my Robocop state!

And no neither Mike Rupert nor Mike Rothmiller of LAPD were crazy when they charged LAPD and CIA of being in bed together in running drugs internationally and other crimes. Nor were/are many other federal, state and local agents and detectives who have multitudes of evidence throughout America from LAPD to NYPD of the drug running and many other crimes by shadow government cabal inside CIA, FBI, ATF, and many other agencies with corrupt, conditioned cops.

Thanks to LAPD rumor control that spread I was very dangerous, carried six guns and two hand grenades at all times-that rumor helped keep me alive. Hey guys it was only two guns (not to mention what was in them) but sorry no grenades, and just one other very secret weapon and the best weapon of all…my brain!

And thanks to the CIA, when trying to recruit me, for all of the valuable ‘detailed’ information I received in my weeks of instructions on becoming an expert international arms dealer. Could it be that when I finally refused to be one of you that you had be fired on trumped up charges. Did you really think I was that ignorant that I didn’t know you planned to have me once hired, ‘accidentally’ dropped out of a C-130 or otherwise disposed of. Did you think I would allow my key informant to take that cruise to Costa Rica with you so you could drop her over the side. Yes my law enforcement intelligence partner from another jurisdiction had been documenting as to how many persons never returned from those ‘day long cruises’ with you. You are so lucky to have had such high ranking corrupt friends inside U.S. Customs and ATF in Washington, D.C. to stop our investigation. They even stoped the IRS!

Notice though that I never stopped anyway?

Thanks also to the ‘real’ good guys who are ‘proven’ un-named whistleblowers from the CIA, FBI, military intelligence, military officers-current and former, as well as other agencies, all of whom I learned much from in many fields. You have never heard of most of these
men and women.

And I have not yet even written about the major crimes involving airlines, MAFIA, CIA, LAPD and massive corruption and cover up in which I have another four good guy retired FBI S/A (special agents) to back me up!

Nor have I even touched on the subject of Operation GLADIO-commando operations in Europe in which the CIA (U.S. and allies) trained and financed European terrorists to kill multitudes of innocent people in bombings and shootings in order to frighten the public into crying out for more state security! In the words of one Belgian terrorist who’s leader reported to the CIA, “we were told to kill mostly just women and children…” Read…machine gunning innocent women and children in supermarkets and while they were fleeing outside the market! This was in a city in Belgium. Isn’t mind control/behavior modification wonderful? This is all documented evidence on GLADIO.

And to you FBI, ATF, CIA, etc., agents…these U.S. commandos seriously injured federal policemen in more than one country. The terrorists trained by GLADIO commandos killed federal policemen. Remember the three dead Carabinieri in Italy?

Maybe it will be you, your partner, or your children here in America…by your own military, U.S. and allied commandos. No… Patriotic Americans are not the enemy-it is your own government cabal of men who would sacrifice you and your family for their purposes.

So CIA, FBI, U.S. Army, CIA and U.S. military mind control doctors, etc., etc., …do you think we don’t remember anything?

For John and Jane Q. Citizens of the USA and those in other countries, do you get the picture yet about the planned 9-11 New York and pentagon attacks on innocent persons, why, and by whom?

Operation Northwoods (pretext for a Cuban Invasion) was a plan that was never put into play.

However GLADIO was operational for decades…and many innocent persons were killed. More to come on the history and status of GLADIO.

I hope that this small piece reaches many countries and many more in America. For I have only just begun to speak out.
More to come.

Edward L. Schooling LAPD retired

(Schooling is retired from LAPD having worked plainclothes special operations and detectives tracking criminals internationally and gathering evidence on corrupt police and federal agents.
He was also stationed in the U.S. Army in Italy, with a top secret clearance.

Ted Gunderson letter to Congressman Dan Burton about Whistleblower Stew Webb

This letter by Ted Gunderson to Congressman Dan Burton never arrived to Burton’s office yet Ted Gunderson told this Whistleblower he sent it. Gunderson “MO” make you think he was a good guying trying to help you but was there to bleed your brain for the Bush-AIPAC Organized Crime Syndicate.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:


Affidavit of Investigative Journalist from Las Vegas who was a direct witness

when Ted Gunderson and Convicted Killer Tom Gaul tried to frame Stew Webb

On false assault and which is burglary if the assault took place at another’s home according to Nevada Revised Statues, charges to silence Stew Webb and to extort Stew Webb in 2000;

These false charges were dismissed with prejudice 2 weeks before a trial.

Ted Gunderson works for CIA DCS FBI Patriot Spy.


[As a witness, I am bringing a matter of my concern to the attention of the court.

I have knowledge of circumstances at and relating to Ted Gunderson’s home, during some time periods when Stew Webb has been accused of committing crimes on the premises. I also have knowledge of my association and some interactions between Ted Gunderson, Anna (May) Newman, Thomas Gaule and Stew Webb. Because of this, I was asked to testify in this case and to give the court a statement. Had the prosecution asked me, I would have done the same for them.

When I came to testify at a hearing for a restraining order on the date: January- -2001, I was harassed and intimidated solely because I was a witness, by Thomas Gaule and Anna (May) Newman, in the courthouse, which animosity and disturbing actions I did not inititate, having always been civil with all of these parties.

Up until this point, I had never had any cross words with Anna or Ted, and considered them pleasant aquaintances and friendly associates, in spite of the issues and accusations that have arisen. I had never spoken with any malice, anger or intent to hurt Thomas Gaule; in fact, I had done things which were to the benefit all of the herein-named parties.

Finding myself in the same place as Tom and Anna, I acknowledged them and stated that I had been asked to testify. That is all I said. In my heart, I was here simply to do my duty as a citizen, and I hoped to be able to do so as fairly to all concerned as I could.

I was immediately attacked in a very chilling, evil manner by them, which bothered me and still does. Thomas began insinuating that there was some conspiracy between myself and Stew, saying that it was clear that (that was) what was going on here, and comments to that end – that me and Stew were involved in this together. I felt the viciousness in a physical way.

Anna also attacked me venomously, which was as unprovoked as Thomas’s slurs. She snarled, “You deserve each other,” and insinuated that I belonged in the same category, or should have the same fate as Stew. In light of the accusations against Stew, and statements made immediately thereafter, I have cause to be concerned about such warrantless attacks, and I call upon the court to remind the parties that to harass a witness in this manner is against the interest of creating an environment free from intimidation where a witness may testify freely and fairly. I just do not deserve this treatment when I go out of my way to come to the court simply because it is my civic responsibility.

I have witnessed since that time misleading insinuations and statements made while the parties were under an oath, and also made in open court; I believe I have witnessed acts of perjury, and intent to commit perjury on the part of the prosecuting parties. I have told them of what they have done wrong and that it is a crime. I speak out; I have no desire to take my time to come to the court, but since I must, I need to do so in peace and with respect for my protection as a witness. I never had spoken any hurtful words to any of these people. I appreciate the seriousness with which the judge is addressing the issue.

My only involvement with this case is that I have knowledge about the credibility of the witnesses, relationship of the parties involved, incorrect and inconsistent statements made by the other witnesses, and the statements made to me when I spoke with Ted Gunderson, Anna and Thomas which corraborate Stew Webb’ accounts on several points; for example, that Stew did have permission to be at Ted’s apartment during the period that he was accused of burglary (which charge has been dropped) ]


: copyclaim(c)copyright: __-May-2001: Colleen-Lloyd

Click here: This transcript from Stew Webb Restraining Order hearing against Ted Gunderson and Tom Gaule is a must read, look what Ted Gunderson says about American Patriots. Also read Colleen Lloyd’s Affidavit who testified in behalf of Stew Webb.

Stew Webb filed a Grand Jury Demand US District Court against Ted Gunderson, Tom Gaule and Anna May Newman for sending a Swat team to kill Stew Webb for trying to extort Stew Webb and attempted murder.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Stew Webb files a protective order and stalking by Ted Gunderson with Las Vegas Police


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Stew Webb’s Motion to extend restraining order against Ted Gunderson, Convicted Killer Thomas Gaul and Anna May Newman the once maid to Clint Murchison Jr. who was Ted Gunderson’s handler. When Clint Murchison died in 1997 time frame and Gunderson was in charge of the Murchison estate Anna May Newman, an illegal immigrant from Ireland wanted to go home to Ireland.  Gunderson conned her out of $70,000.00 of her $80,000 retirement to get back to Ireland. Gunderson told her I have this kid case-Satanism that I will be paid $200,000 in a few months I need a temporary loan of $70,000 to prove the case, she was dumb enough to give Gunderson her money. Then when the Merchinson estate was sold and they had to leave Gunderson used her as his maid in Las Vegas where Gunderson was able to get her illegal Social Security and her quart of Rum and Coke Dailey, while she paid the rent from her illegal social security checks. He keep telling her as soon as I get paid the $200,000 from Killer Tom Gaule’s mothers estate I will pay you back then you can go home to Ireland, which never happened. This was the reason Gunderson tried to extort this Whistleblower out of documents I did not have, but had access to for a fee that Gunderson did not want to pay the $4,500 to the Famous Iran Contra investigator Stephen Dinnerstein. Instead Gunderson tried to charge theis Whistleblower to extort me out of these documents I did not possess and Gunderson wanted them so he could shake down-Blackmail  and extort the Clark County, Las Vegas Public Administrator Jarrett Shaffer. Instead I of felt paying the fee, Gunderson’s extortion plot by using Convicted Killer Thomas Gaule to bring false assault charges against this Whistleblower which later where dismissed with prejudice, completely failed. More about this was discussed in the previous article linked below.

AIPAC and Abramoff Operated Child Sex Blackmail Ring

Stew Webb files Motion to extend Restraining Order against Ted Gunderson and Tom Gaule


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Stew Webb Files Perjury Charges against Ted Gunderson


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Stew Webb files for Order of Protection against Las Vegas Killer Thomas Gaule


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Stew Webb files Order of Protection against ted Gunderson


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Convicted Killer Thomas Gaule files assult cahrges against Stew Webb if a assult occures on a third parties property under the Nevada Revised Statues it is considerated to be a burglary.


Click on Document above to Enlarge:

Killer Tom Gaule walks the streets of Las Vegas ready to kill more people, a Declared Nut Case, because of Ted Gunderson’s Obstruction of Justice and false testimony in the Tom Gaule murders, for money that Gunderson was never paid except $300.00 without a Private Investigators license in Nevada, which could make Gunderson Perjured Testimony Null and Void, Frauds upon the Court.

Ted Gunderson was fined $2,500.00 by the Attorney General’s office in 2000 as a result of this Whistleblower and the sh__, that Ted Gunderson was illegally throwing on me for the Bush’s and for and by his own greed. I worked with the Attorney General office licensing Division who brought the charges and hearing and fined Gunderson over the Binion, Casino Murder case of Gunderson operating without a Private Investigators License in Nevada. That $2,500.00 is the exact amount Tom Gaule and Ted Gunderson cost this Whistleblower for their stooge game.

Convicted Killer Thomas Gaule files assault charges against Stew Webb if a assault occurs on a third parties property under the Nevada Revised Statues it is considerate to be a burglary, after Stew Webb filed for Restraining Order to extort and Jail this Whistleblower. Gunderson sent a swat team in first before the protective orders where filed to finds the documents he wanted to get paid by Tom Gaule and extort this Whistleblower.

Convicted Killer Thomas Gaule files assault charges against this author Stew Webb if a assault occurs on a third parties property (Gunderson’s) under the Nevada Revised Statues it is considerate to be a burglary, after Stew Webb filed for Restraining Order to extort and Jail this Whistleblower. Gunderson sent a swat team in first before the protective orders were filed to find the documents he wanted to get paid by Tom Gaule to cover up Tom Gaule’s two killing of two men, Tom Gaule owned money for moving items from his mother’s rental property to her home Gaule was living in.

The two men came to collect the $150.00 he promised to pay them and Gaule came to the door with a shot gun and shot one and chased both down the drive and the street and shot them in the back and killed them. Tom Gaule claimed it was self defense, it was not Tomas Gaule told this Whistleblower what had happened when I drilled him and got the truth out of the F— Killer. Then Satanic filth Gunderson takes Gaule’ case as an expert witness for the $200,000 Gaule promised Gunderson from Gaule’s Mother’s estate Gaule did not control and then the two criminals tried to extort documents from this Whistleblower Stew Webb, so Killer Tom Gaule and Ted Gunderson could blackmail the Clark County, Nevada Public Administrator Jarrett Shaffer, to release Tom Gaule’s mothers estate to Ted Gunderson. Gunderson then would have liquidated the $1/2 million dollars estate and been paid for lying to get a killer off murder charges. Gunderson lied as a so called expert witness to get Tom Gaule off 2 murder charges and on probation as a so called robbery self defense case.



Ted Gunderson’s sidekick Sodomite, child porno collector and Denver’s FBI cross dresser lying snitch Troll for money Tim White, who’s direct boss and Handler is FBI agent Mark Hostlaw named below.

March 18, 2002

Today I contacted the Colorado Gaming Commission to verify the age

of one of its commissioners, Richard Millman. (In his 40s)

After a lengthy conversation with a Colorado State Agent, he revealed

to me that he had been previously contacted by FBI agent Mark Holstlaw

of the Denver FBI office regarding a Richard Millman.

I had reported to FBI agent Mark Hostlaw a month ago that I had

information that Bush Crime Family Kingpin Leonard Yale Millman

of Denver, Colorado, was using fictitious names one being a Richard Millman of Colorado Springs, Colorado. I had asked Mark Hostlaw

Division 5 FBI to see if the Colorado Gaming Commissioner was the

same 76 year old as Leonard Millman.

FBI Hostlaw never reported back.

I had given this to FBI Mark Hostlaw to test him and his office,

to see if obstruction of Justice would occur.

I did not tell him what I had discover regarding Leonard Millman

The Bush Crime Family Narcotics Money Launderer and Scamster

my former-father-in-law.

What I have discovered about Leonard Millman aka Richard Millman.

(More will come out about Leonard the Richard)

While talking to this State Investigator, I was told Mark Hostlaw

had contacted him about The Gaming Commissioner Richard Millman.

(Note this Richard Millman an Attorney from Col. Springs, is not the

same Richard Millman I have identified as Leonard Millman)

After lengthy conversation with the State agent I was told that

FBI Mark Hostlaw contacted Richard Millman the Attorney

and warned him that Stew Webb might try to harm him.

Because Stew Webb thought this was his former-in-law

and that Stew Webb had made threats against Leonard Millman

in the past. (I was locked up on false threat charges for 10 1/2

months 1992-1993 the case was dismissed with prejudice see

story below)

The State agent further told me that a man was shot in the head

who was down the street from this attorney Richard Millman

and that Richard Millman had contacted him because of the

contact from FBI Mark Hostlaw, and was in fear of his life.

The Illicit FBI in Denver has used numerous sources, and numerous

Municipalities to try and permantantly jail me for years on

false, and fictious charges, to protect the Scamster Leonard

Millman. aka Richard Millman. “The Bush Crime Family

Denver Connection”. (See Bush Crime Family Flow Chart by

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower

The Colorado agent informed me I was their number 1 suspect.

Every one reading this, I would ask you to pray for the man whom

was shot in the head, the Colorado agent said he is still alive.

Pray that Jesus-GOD almighty will give him a complete recovery.


A message to FBI Mark Hostlaw and FBI Iran/Contra cover up

Artist Tom Fisher, your game did not work, you are now exposed.

The question now is, which one of you shot this guy, to frame me

on a false murder charge?


Leonard/Richard  Millman, I will expose what I am working on.

Major scandal coming.


S&L whistle-blower faces federal charges


Houston Chronicle

September 18, 1992

A man said to have been an instrumental source in unraveling

the savings and loan crisis
was in Harris County Jail Monday on

federal charges of making threatening interstate telephone calls.

Stewart Anthony Webb 38, allegedly made calls to his former

father-in-law, wealthy Denver businessman Leonard Millman.

Webb contends the FBI unjustly acted because of pressure from

Millman, but a spokesman for the agency’s Denver office denied

any government impropriety.

Jonathan C, Beaty, a senior correspondent for Time magazine,

wrote a letter in support of Webb.

“The news articles that Mr. Webb contributed to exposed a pattern

of illicit political influence in Denver and led to the indictments,

and subsequent convictions, of several businessmen,” said Beaty’s

letter placed in court records.

Webb, who had lived in Houston for a year before his recent arrest,

is expected to be returned to Colorado for trial.

H. Michael Sokolow, a public defender, wrote in an emergency

appeal to reduce Webb’s $ 50,000 bond that Webb provided information

to Congress pertaining to the late 1980’s influence peddling scandal

in the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Webb, a construction contractor by trade, also provided information

to lawyers and investigators in the failure of Lincoln and Silverado

savings and loans, Sokolow said.

“Mr. Webb,” he wrote, “is a political whistle-blower on fraud on

the highest levels of federal institutions.”

Webb claims tape-recorded conversations between him and Millman,

on which the FBI based its charges, were made during a child custody

dispute in the mid-1980s. An FBI affidavit said the conversations

were made from Independence, Mo., to Denver from 1987 to 1991.

Political Prisoner Case number 92-C-R-356

False Warrant Sept. 18, 1991 (Hide from FBI, was guest on 70 Radio

Talk shows)

False Arrest Sept. 16, 1992

Released July 20, 1993

Charges dismissed with prejudice Aug. 20, 1993

By Federal Judge Richard Matsch US District Court Denver, Colorado


Murdered by Brenda Nigre, Ted Gunderson’s side kick and associate Patriot Spy’s and killers for the Bush-AIPAC Organized Crime Syndicate

Brian Downing Quig, Investigative Journalist, Whistleblower, and a personal

friend of mine was Killed Monday June 16th 2003 at 2-230 AM PST, Brian was shoved on a shopping cart in front of a oncoming car and was hit at 75th Ave. & Catalina Dr. in Phoenix Arizona. Brian was struck by a vehicle driven by a 17 year old Hispanic, with 2 passengers, one passenger was hospitalized, the driver was taken into custody for drug testing and being held for questioning. Brian was cremated. Services by close friends were held Sat June 21, 2003.

An investigation by this Whistleblower and others is ongoing, reports are forthcoming.

Brian had been a researcher, Investigator, and Journalist for nearly 20 years, working in the Phoenix, Arizona area; he had contributed to such Books as

“The Mafia CIA & George Bush”, by Pete Brewton SPI, Press NY. (Amazon)

He further had a web-site, in which his investigative articles had exposed many Illegal CIA-Bush drug operations.

Brian had been a lead investigator in such exposes as The Buddhist Temple Murders & the murder of talk show host Don Bolls of Arizona.

During the 1989-1992 Lincoln Saving & Loan Frauds, Brian & I had worked hand in hand investigating the ties of CIA Charles Keating with Silverado Savings and Loan, and its owner Leonard Millman an AIPAC stooge, & his “front-cronies” Neil Bush, Larry Mizel, Millman/Bush-CIA Attorney Norman Brownstein, all directors of Silverado and both Directors of AIPAC.

Brian was actually going to Charles Keating corporate offices at night digging

in the trash cans, retrieving documents, notes, and carbon copies for our investigations.

Some of these documents were later turned over to the Attorneys who Filed suit and actually Jailed CIA-Charles Keating in July of 1992 under a RICO lawsuit because U.S. Attorney in Phoenix had been bribed by Leonard Millman not to persecute Charles Keating.

The Larock law firm out of San Diego, California successfully prosecuted and Jailed Charles Keating, who later was released after serving ½ his sentence.

This suit and a $2 Billion Dollar Judgment rendered against Keating, and other including MDC Holdings, Inc., (Richmond Homes) where they committed Frauds upon the Court in a $200,000 settlement claiming they were bankrupt when they had $12.5 billion in assets. Silverado Savings and loan was MDC’s subsidiary company with a 24% ownership in Silverado and Imperial Savings.  The Saudi European Investment Corp., Part of B.C.C.I., Bank of Credit and Commerce International suit which included members of the Saudi Royal Family, Kuwait, Pakistan, including former Texas Governor John Connelly,  had been the passenger in The Presidential Limousine when President John F. Kennedy was murdered by CIA George HW Bush and others in Dallas, Texas November 22, 1963.

This RICO-BCCI  Lawsuit that Jailed Charles Keating, and which forced John Connelly in to filing bankrupts, was after Federal, State, and local prosecutors refused to do their jobs, which is Obstruction of Justice. Hillary Clinton was the first attorney of record of B.C.C.I. in a SEC lawsuit against B.C.C.I. and Jackson Stephen of Little Rock, Arkansas. Hillary Clinton is part of The AIPAC Bush Organized Crime Syndicate with over 300 dead people to her credit in the Ollie North-Bush-Clinton Iran/Contra Drugs for Guns Illegal operation.

Later I found out about the Bribes and Payoffs of these officials laundered through M&L Business Machines Company of Denver, Colorado, an M.D.C. Holding, Inc. (MDC-NYSE) subsidiary company. Leonard Millman paid a $80 Million Dollar fine in 1987 over his bribing of Government Officials and never spent a day in jail, the case was sealed under National Security by President William Jefferson Clinton, who’s attorney served on the Board of Directors of Millman’s M.D.C. Holding, Inc.  Millman’s Chubb Insurance company of Denver where Millman and George HW Bush’s attorney AIPAC Director Norman Brownstein served on the Board of Directors and paid Paul Jones off and Bill Clintons legal bills and fines related to Clinton’s 1998 Impeachment.

MDC Holdings, Inc. is controlled by “The Bush Crime Family King Pin Comptroller Money launderer and Illuminati Knights Templar Leonard Yale Millman who owned and operated Silverado, this Whistleblowers former father in law that I meet one time.

Brian had further discovered connections of the notorious illegal weapons for narcotics dealer General John Singlaub who was involved heavily with Iran/Contra & who still to this day, is involved with Narcotics trafficking into America. General Singlaub based in Phoenix was deeply involved with General Richard Secord and Col. Oliver North, which has been testified too, that General Singlaub ran the Mena Arkansas Drug operations which had ties to George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and others.

General Singlaub had been fired by President Jimmy Carter.

In 1998 Ted Gunderson was trying to sell an illegal condominium project for General Singlaub on property owned by Singlaub in Bahia, California to Patriots/Truth Tellers, another one of Gunderson’s scams.  In 1991 General John Singlaub’s 707 Jet caught fire, a jet engine, after being overloaded with cocaine and DEA Agents busted and confiscated the Jet. Singlaub bought the Jet back from DEA action within a year without being charged or arrested.

General John Singlaub had offices across the hall from Charles Keating.

Brian further discovered that Walter Bush of Walter Bush Securities, George HW Bush’s nephew, had offices across the hall from Charles Keating as well selling illegal securities and never has been charged, all part of Iran Contra.

Brian had retrieved tremendous documentation, of which he shared copies of notes and other things relating to Arms dealings and narcotics, securities frauds, and Direct White House and Secret Service Connections and communications relating to cover-ups of these frauds.

Brian further had retrieved documentation showing Charles Keating being an attorney for Carl Lindnar of Ohio, owner of Chiquita Bananas & United fruit.

Carl Lindnar was the owner of the Costa Rico Ranch which was directly involved with the Iran-Contra Narcotics for weapons operations, where the country of Costa Rica later indicted Oliver North and many others for Guns and Drug Running.

Brian had further supplied me with a copy of a document showing that Charles Keating was ordered by a court never to enter into the Financial Institutions Business after the collapse of Home State saving of Ohio involving Carl Lindnar and Israeli Mossad agent Bruce Rapport. Charles Keating had been the previous Attorney and Board of Directors of American Financial Corp., the  Parent Company of Home State Saving, which was one of the first Savings and Loan collapses dating back to 1979.

I have several copies hidden, given to me by a top intelligence operatives that shows the indictments by Costa Rica, Senate & Congress of Carl Lindnar, Oliver North, George H.W. Bush, General Singlaub, John Hall, General Richard Secord, Assistant U.S. Attorney William Richard Scruggs and others, involving Narcotics for weapons operations on Carl Lindnar’s Ranch in Costa Rica. Carl Lindnar is know as one of the two Illegal Comptrollers-Money Launders of “The Bush Crime Family” in the United States. Lindnar was known as the OHIO Connection.

Illuminati Drug Smugglers Indicted by Costa Rica Government Illuminati Drug Smugglers Indicted

The other “Illuminati Council of 13” being Leonard Millman, of Denver Colorado, known as the Denver Connection, Millman was the owner of 17,000 acres of property in Belize on the east coast of Mexico which was used for guns and drugs involving Panama and Nicaragua all part of Iran/Contra. This property in Belize had further ownership involving Neil Bush and CIA-Congressman Porter Goss of Florida, who now is the Chairman of the House Intelligence Oversight Committee.

Brian further, came and saw me last year 2002 in Las Vegas for 3 days, in which, we shared tremendous information relating to each other’s investigations and overlays.

In particular Oklahoma City Bombing.

It is always a delight to have someone as knowledgeable as Brian was about current illegal operations of State (Shadow Government).

I have found over the years that very few hold the knowledge of the real crimes

of the “Bush Crime Family”, Therefore when I am able to get together with old friends of the past, whom I have had the Honor of knowing and working with, it is a delight, and of course I always am able to not only pick up pieces of the puzzle, but also share the pieces I have, and know this information will be keep confidential, until something serious can be done to expose it.

I might add that I have had so many stupid people & Government spies try to infiltrate me, by claiming to have information, like Ted Gunderson & Groupie Brenda Negri, when in fact they have nothing and are there to try and bleed my brain, which of course, I learned this many years ago, so I just play along and tell them what they want to hear with a lot of spin. They usually walk out frustrate and when they find out I am not naive or stupid and realize they have been had they always get td-off. I have learned to spot them and they have a peculiar odor about them.

Brian and I laughed about the plants the last time I saw him in person.

I might add that I talked to Brian only days before his death, not only about current things he was working on but also about Bush ordering the Murders of Whistleblowers and I had warned him to watch his back and spread the word.

I also had warned him regarding CIA Ted Gunderson Groupies, in particular

Nutcase Brenda Negri, who had been attacking Brian in the past on a yahoo group message board. Brian was quite aware, and felt she was a disinformationalist, he further said he would keep her entertained if she bothers him anymore.

Brian had further shared with me information were a spook had put something out claiming I was giving legal advice to one of Brains adversaries, of course this was not true. Brian had asked if I would confront this spook.

Brian and I discussed many things including how the Government metal cases, were trying to disrupt and waist each other’s time.

There has been a small circle of true Investigative Journalist and Whistleblower

some who worked for the Government and some like me who never have, but by some weird circumstances became a Federal Whistleblower?

In this small circle everyone pretty much knows of each other and in many cases has either helped one another on various Investigations or has helped the other when in need of information, or help on their particular case.

Brian was a person who would go out of his way for someone in need,

and had always helped with various investigations when I called upon him.

And I would always help Brian, he was not only a friend, he was sincere

dedicated and could be trusted. I myself had helped Brian regarding the Temple Murders, I had spent several days with Brian in 1996 while doing a speech there.

I had the opportunity to meet several of Brains close associates, and even had the Feds, Office of Strategic Services tracking me for quite awhile, until I was able to shake them. Brian had said they had been around for a long time bothering him.

I further will add for humor, this was in 1994, while I had been in phoenix for a

Conference and to do a speech were I had asked Brian to also address the audience.

Other friends of mine IRS Attorney Larry Becraft, Gene Shroulder who exposed the emergency wars powers act, had also spoken together with me at the conference.

The next day, Brian myself and others were at the swimming pool at the motel where I & others stayed, this was in 1994 back then we booth were a few years younger and not so much gray hair.

Anyway here is the story we are at the pool drooling over 2 beautiful women at a Hotel I am staying at for ther night, these women were number 11 on a scale of 1-10, 10 being tops and of course being in Phoenix a City of Gorgeous Women.

So Brian’s says shall we try, I said sure, but if we tell them what we booth do for a living (Whistleblowers-Patriots) they will run like hell.

Brian says we will try to avoid this, I was in agreement. So when we made the moves, and by our own surprise, they were politically orientated and hated the Government they thought of Politicians as criminals. So when we were asked what we booth did, these gorgeous beasts were so impressed, they would not leave us alone.

We actually spent the evening training them, Brian as I recall dated

the one several times, they booth were from Flag staff north of Phoenix.

At that time I was living in Denver.

The funny thing was when Brian came to Vegas, we spent so much time discussing the Lord, end time prophecy and how America was going into the tubes, because Americans just sit by waiting for someone to pick up the ball and run with it.

Yet as Brian stated they want guys like you and I to do the work, yet they will not even help out with money to see it gets done.

Brian said if we could ever get the Grand Jury, Bush would be Jailed and Hung for Treason.

Brian, I am going to miss you my friend, and I give you my promised I will find out what happened, and if this was Bush, and not an accident, who ever I find was involved, will feel the heat.

I have had now over 50 of my friends killed at the hands of the Millma-Bush-AIPAC Organized Crime Family.

Only 3 have we found who did it, those 3 killers are in there graves, Brenda Nigre is still a loose murdering nut wing for Daddy Bush.

Good people within the Intelligence community do not like it when, they hear that someone like Brian was killed.

They happen to take revenge themselves.

Feeling it is the only form of Justice.

See you in heaven one day; hope it is not soon, I have to kick some Illuminati ass first here on Earth.

Your friend always.

Stew Webb

Brian Quig was murdered by Brenda Nigre who worked with Ted Gunderson, Tim White, Doug Malre, Larry Lawson, John W Allman aka the dead Ken Adachi, Satanist Pam Shuffert, John Allman’s side kick Dorene Miller, and the others on FBI shadow Governments payroll as informants and snitches also known as Trolls.

See my Grand Jury Demand below where the above are named.



U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch


Original File Date Feb. 27, 1995

Re-Filed This Date: July 1, 2003 By Fed Ex

Stamped & Recorded By The Clerk of The Court July 2, 2003

303-335-2714 U.S. District Court Clerk

Re-Filed By Fax August 4, 2004

Pages 1-21

Stewart A. Webb,

And in behalf of

Amanda Melia Webb (Amanda Millman)

Plaintiff’s Daughter,

And in behalf of

The People Of The United States of America

And The United States Of America

P.O. Box 1673

Independence, Missouri 64055




Kerre Sue Millman (aka Kerre Webb) attempted murderer of her-infant daughter re: mental disturbance warrant-case number 84-2107-MI State of Texas vs. Kerre Sue Webb (Millman) for attempted murder upon her infant daughter Amanda Melia Webb age-28 days old, Aug 10, 1984, co-conspirator-recipient of illegal monies from Leonard Millman/Narcotics Money Launderer Bush Crime Family

Leonard Yale Millman (Co-Conspirator Bush Crime Family Money Launder/Kingpin/Scamster/Terrorist “The Denver Connection”) Organized Crime Figure, Conspired to murder, Plaintiff Stewart Webb, Owner & controller MDC Holdings, Inc. Obstruction of Justice, Securities Frauds, Loan Frauds, Loan reinsurance frauds, Real Estate Loan Frauds, conspired to cause economic plunder,(Death Penalty). Conspired, manufactured Illegal Biological Chemical agents and sold to foreign enemies of The United States of America, aka Iraqgate-BNL Bank-Gulf War Syndrome. Violations of The Barkley Cole Indenture Act, Treason.

Elaine Ruth Millman (Co-Conspirator, wife, and partner to Organized Crime Figure Leonard Millman, Securities Frauds, Loan Frauds, Loan reinsurance frauds, Real Estate Loan Frauds, Obstruction of Justice.)

George W. Bush (Co-Conspirator of Murderer, Appointed President of The United States of America, (not legally elected) Acting as Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces of The United States of America, Obstruction of Justice, Mass Murderer, Involvement in Aid & Abet, Enabled & Co-conspired to allow massive Financial Fraud, and misconduct with prior knowledge to allow injury to such investors at who had no knowledge of the events to transpire. Obstruction of Justice. Aid & Abet, Enable to cause the deaths of Federal Agents/Civilians/Military—-Murder..)

George Herbert Walker Bush (Co-Conspirator Ex CIA Director/Former US President, Co-conspirator to Terrorist event know as 9-11 Sept. 11, 2001, Co-conspirator to Terrorist Bombing of The Oklahoma City Federal Building April 19, 1995, Obstruction of Justice.) Conspired, manufactured Illegal Biological Chemical agents and sold to foreign enemies of The United States of America, aka Iraqgate-BNL Bank-Gulf War Syndrome. Violations of The Barkley Cole Indenture Act, Treason.

Neil Bush (Co-Conspirator Former Director Silverado Savings & Loan, Narcotics trafficking, Securities Frauds, Obstruction of Justice)

Jeb Bush (Co-Conspirator Governor Florida, Narcotics trafficking, Obstruction of Justice)

Marvin Bush (Co-conspirator 9-11, Sept. 11, 2001 Houston Causality Insurance Company)

James Baker (Co-conspirator to terrorist event know as 9-11 Sept. 11, 2001. Houston Causality Insurance Company)

Carl Lindner (Co-Conspirator Bush Crime Family Money Launderer/Kingpin/Scamster “The Ohio Connection”)

Gale Norton (Co-Conspirator US Secretary Of Interior/ Former Attorney General Colorado, Obstruction of Justice )

Phillip D. Winn (Co Conspirator Convicted HUD Figure/Former Swiss Ambassador/ Illegal Pres. Pardon, MDC Director, Obstruction of Justice)

Larry A. Mizel (Co Conspirator CEO MDC Holdings, Inc. Parent Co. of Silverado/Imperial Savings, Securities Fraud, Narcotics Money Laundering, Narcotics trafficking, Pension Funds Frauds)

Norman Phillip Brownstein (Co-Conspirator Council to CIA Director George Bush Current Bush Crime Family Attorney, Former MDC Director, Obstruction of Justice.)

Oliver North (Co-Conspirator Narcotics Trafficker, Iran/Contra Player, murderer.)

Hillary Clinton (Co-Conspirator CIA Counsel US Senator NY., Narcotics Money Laundering to M&L Business Machines Company Denver Colorado, Obstruction of Justice, Blackmail of US Congressman & Senators.)

William Jefferson Clinton (Co-Conspirator CIA Agent/Former US President, Narcotics trafficking into The United States of America, Iran/Contra, Obstruction of Justice)

Charles Keating (Co-Conspirator CEO Lincoln Savings/CIA Operative, Money Laundering to MDC Holdings and BCCI)

Federico Pena (Co-Conspirator Former Mayor Denver, Co., Former Secretary Transportation/ Resigned Sec Energy while under indictment, recipient of Bribes to Obstruct Justice)

Wellington Webb (Co-Conspirator Bond Fraud Denver International Airport Mayor Denver, Colorado)

Meyer Blinder (Co- Conspirator CEO Blinder/Robinson/National Brokerage Group of Companies, an MDC Subsidiary company)

Linda Thomas (Co-Conspirator Divorce Judge Dallas, TX. Obstruction of Justice, recipient of Bribes to Obstruct Justice.)

Brian Campbell (Co-conspirator Divorce Judge Denver Colorado, Ongoing Obstruction of Justice, Permanent Restraint order against Stewart Webb & Amanda Webb-Amanda Millman now of legal age.)

Zita L. Weinshenk (Co-Conspirator US Federal Judge Denver, Obstruction of Justice, Recipient of Bribes to Obstruct Justice)

Edward Nottingham (Co-Conspirator US Federal Judge Denver, Obstruction of Justice)

Sherman Finesilver (Co-Conspirator Retired US Federal Judge Denver, Obstruction of Justice, Recipient of Bribes to Obstruct Justice)

Henry Solano (Co-Conspirator Former US Attorney, Denver, Obstruction of Justice Co-conspirator attempted murder.)

Michael J. Norton (Co-Conspirator Former US Attorney, Denver, Obstruction of Justice, recipient of bribes to Obstruct Justice)

Greg C. Graff (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Attorney, Denver, Obstruction of Justice, Brother Robert Graff MDC Director.)

Thomas O’Rourke (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Attorney, Denver, Obstruction of Justice)

F. Joseph Mackey (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Attorney, Denver, Obstruction of Justice)

Charles Szekely (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Public Defender, Denver, Obstruction of Justice)

Charles Sandage (Co-Conspirator, Obstruction of Justice)

Lee Redneick (Co-Conspirator Inspector General US Department of Justice Public Integrity Section Washington. DC., Obstruction of Justice) (Note: “” & “” )

David Mann (Assistant Inspector General US Department of Justice Washington DC., Obstruction of Justice, recipient of Bribes to Obstruct Justice)

Robert Pence (Co-Conspirator Former FBI/sac Denver, Obstruction of Justice, Recipient of Bribes to Obstruct Justice)

James M. Lyons (Co-Conspirator Director MDC, Key Player Whitewater Development Frauds.)

Allan Karsh (Co-Conspirator Denver Kingpin Leonard Millman’s Brother-in-law)

Ted L. Gunderson (Ex FBI/CIA, Murderer, Scamster, Supplied Bin Laudin with Stinger Missiles Stole From US Military Arsenal-China Lake/FBI/CIA/Iran Contra Player, Perjury, Obstruction of Justice. Currently Stalking and committing criminal harassment of Plaintiff and Plaintiffs witnesses. Perjured testimony to extort plaintiff. Perjured testimony to Jail plantiff Stewart Webb, Charges later dismissed with prejudice, Scamster, Fraudster, ongoing criminal activity,Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses )

Thomas Gaule (Co-Conspirator Convicted Killer, Las Vegas NV. Mental Case/Sidekick-Co-Conspirator to CIA Ted Gunderson, Obstruction of Justice, Extortion, Perjured testimony to extort Plaintiff, Perjured testimony to Jail plantiff Stewart Webb, Charges later dismissed with prejudice,)

Anna May Newman (Co-Conspirator Former employee for CIA Agent Clint Murchison side-kick-to CIA Ted Gunderson, perjury to Obstruct Justice.)

TIM WHITE (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted L. Gunderson/Leonard Millman Predicate Felon Cross-dresser, Child porno collector, making Death Threats against plaintiff and plaintiff witnesses, stolen weapon, Criminal harassment, Perjured testimony to Obstruct Justice, acting as an informer to the FBI-Denver Police. Plotting to extort Plaintiff, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

BRENDA NEGRI (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted L. Gunderson, making death threats, criminal harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

LARRY LAWSON (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted L. Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

SHIRLEY ANDERSON (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted L. Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

DOUG MILLAR (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson, violations of copyright laws, criminal harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

SHERRY SHRINER (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Charles Bruce Stewart (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Ken Adachi (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Dennis BossackCo-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Ann Bossack (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Rosalee Grable (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Nate Dapier (Co-conspirator Stalker for CIA-Ted Gunderson Criminal Harassment, Criminal Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses)

Tom Fisher (Co-conspirator Denver Police Department, Obstruction of Justice, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses with Tim White)

Louis Swent (Co-conspirator Arapaho County Sheriff Dept., Obstruction of Justice, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses with Tim White)

FBI Mark Hostlaw (Co-conspirator FBI Div. 5 anti-terrorist division, Obstruction of Justice, Stalking of Plaintiff & plaintiffs witnesses, with Tim White)

Las Vegas Police Department (Unnamed co-conspirators)

Las Vegas District Attorneys Office (Unnamed co-conspirators)

Las Vegas FBI Office (Unnamed co-conspirators)

Las Vegas US Attorneys Office (Unnamed co-conspirators)

Nevada Attorney General’s Office (Unnamed co-conspirator)

Kansas City, Missouri Police Department. (Unnamed co-conspirators)

Additional Yet Unnamed Defendants 1-5000

and Co-Conspirators




NOW COMES, Plaintiff, Stewart Webb, pro se, and files this Motion to Reopen and in support therefore, would respectfully show the court the following:

I. Motion to reopen, provides that when it clearly appears to be necessary to the due administration of justice, the court may permit additional evidence to be offered at any time; provided that in a jury case no evidence on a controversial matter shall be received after the verdict of the jury.


In order for justice to be served in this case, Plaintiffs, should be allowed to reopen and submit additional evidence, decisive to this matter, to the trier of fact for the following reasons: See: this entire filing,

That a attempted murder of Plaintiff Stewart A. Webb occurred in Sept.

1995 shortly after the Plaintiff and witness Lt. Commander Al Martin

Retired Office of Naval Intelligence, gave testimony by telephone to

the Denver U.S. Attorney Henry Solano. The plaintiff took ill for more than

4 years due to a biological chemical attack, and false arrest

and that the Plaintiff Stewart A. Webb’s witness, Al Martin was falsely arrested and held for 42days under a fictions name. We booth felt at the time to stay alive we had to back off the pushing for a Federal Grand Jury.


PETITIONER seeks to offer the following additional evidence and evidence never presented, due to attempted murder of Plaintiff, and jailment of witness, Al Martin of Iran Contra Key Witness. See: “” .


PETITIONER was diligent in obtaining the above referenced evidence.


Presentation of this additional evidence will not cause undue delay in this case. Furthermore, presentation will not cause an injustice in this case.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED Plaintiffs, prays the court grants the Motion to Reopen and allows PETITIONER to present original and additional evidence and to further grant any other such relief available in law or in equity.

Respectfully submitted

By:Stewart A. Webb Pro se Petitioner & Plaintiffs,




The above and foregoing Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen is set for hearing on at , in the District Court Denver Colorado, on

The last question I would have is why did Ted Gunderson marry in 1999 the Church of Satan’s founder Anton Lavey’s widow?

According to the widow to talked directly to this Whistleblowers sources she kick Teddy boy out after 2 weeks claiming “Ted could not perform in bed and was a 3 minute man”.

Ted Gunderson filed for an annulment of their marriage in Las Vegas Family Court in 1999.


December 15, 2003

I Stewart A. Webb hereby swear that the testimony given here is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

I Stew Webb have never at any time been employed by, nor have been an agent of The United States Government. (I do not work for the CIA, FBI, DCS Domestic Contact Services, or any quasi shadow government agency intelligence agency).

At no time have I received remuneration for providing information to agencies of the US Government.

I Stew Webb was issued the Statues of Federal Whistleblower, under at the time The Federal Whistleblower Act in 1989, because of providing information to Inspector General’s at HUD and the United States Congress pertaining to the 1989 HUD Scandal Hearings, which this extended to the Silverado Savings & Loan hearings, the Keating 5/MDC Holdings, Inc. 200,Silverado Savings Parent Company, Illegal Political Campaign Money Laundering, and the Denver International Airport Scandals which all were investigated, with hearing by Congress which I initiated and worked with the Congressional Investigative Staff, who held hearing on all four subjects.

Under the IRS Act, the application for reward filed by me on the above named scandals relating to the individuals and corporations involved in the various Frauds & Racketeering committed against The People of The United States of America & the U.S. Government, I was and am entitle to a reward that was collected by the IRS against the Criminal perpetrators. This reward due me has never been paid of millions of dollars.

Further information has been provided by me, dozens of times to the FBI, DEA, IRS, customs, Inspector General’s Offices of various agencies, Prosecutors, U.S. Attorneys, and other investigative bodies of State & Federal Government, with no compensation to me.

I Stewart Webb further state that I am not now, nor have ever been
associated with the CIA or any other similar agency of government,
quasi government or other entity seeking to mold government policy.

I Stewart Webb do know many Former & Current Intelligence operatives, of various governments, but I am not, nor have ever been employed by, nor under contract to them or ever received compensation from them.

I Stew Webb did serve in The United States Marine Corps, in my late teens, and was Honorable Discharged.

As an American Patriot, and Defender of the Constitution, it is my duty to continue to expose any and all Criminal Actions and corruption that come to my attention, Under 18 USC 4 Federal Reporting Crimes Act.


The FBI Trolls and stooges of Ted Gunderson and more of the Internet Slander, Lies and Defamation of Character can be found here, the FBI website of Disinformation:

RIP Ken Adachi Dead: Educate-yourself DHS Trolls

Related articles:

AIPAC and Abramoff Operated Child Sex Blackmail Ring

The Octopus Nothing is Secret

AIPAC the Denver Illuminati Wizard’s Espionage and Frauds


Seattle TV interviews Dr Jim Fetzer and Stew Webb Jan 23 2014


Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb Youtube
Would you consider a small donation to help support the cause?
January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:
Stew Webb Founder
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved

Rafik Hariri Murder Trial


by Stephen Lendman

On January 16, the UN’s Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) convened. It did so in the Hague.

Nine years after Hariri’s assassination, show trial proceedings began. Hezbollah members were wrongfully accused. More on this below.

A crime scene courtroom mockup was displayed. Hariri’s killing took place on Beirut’s waterfront. On February 14, 2005, his motorcade was targeted.

A powerful car bomb killed him. Around 20 others perished. Over 100 were injured. The blast left a 30-foot-wide/six-foot-deep crater.

On arrival at Beirut’s American University Hospital, Hariri was pronounced dead. Fingers straightaway pointed the wrong way. Guilty parties were absolved. Innocent ones were accused.

Washington blamed Syria. Bellicose Bush administration threats followed. Media scoundrels regurgitated White House lies.

Washington Post editors said “(t)he despicable murder of Mr. Hariri benefits no one outside the rogue regime in Damascus – and the world should respond accordingly.”

Killing Hariri was “the panicked act of a cornered tyrant,” they claimed. Washington took full advantage. Its ambassador was recalled. Media reports suggested Bush officials had compelling.

Not so. Hezbollah was later blamed. WaPo editors accused its leaders of “homicidal terrorism.” They “threat(en) Lebanon, Israel and the broader Middle East,” they claimed.

At the same time, they called governments in Syria and Iran “dictatorships.” They ignored the real cause of regional violence and instability. Washington and Israel bear full responsibility.

A so-called Lebanese Internal Security Forces Intelligence Branch investigation lied. It claimed compelling evidence of Hezbollah’s involvement.

A UN International Independent Investigation Commission alleged “a network of individuals acted in concert to carry out the assassination of Rafik Hariri and that this criminal network – the ‘Hariri Network’ – or parts thereof are linked to some of the other cases within the Commission’s mandate.”

In February 2006, the UN and Lebanese government proposed establishing a Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL). The Netherlands agreed to host hearings.

On March 1, 2009, STL convened. In June 2011, four Hezbollah members were wrongfully indicted. Mustafa Amine Badreddine, Salim Jamil Ayyash, Hussein Hassan Oneissi and Assad Hassan Sabra were named.

Court-ordered arrest warrants followed. None were detained. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah refused to do so. He denounced the tribunal.

He justifiably called it a sham. Washington and Israel manipulate things. They divert attention from their own involvement.

“The text in our hands now is based on analysis and not clear evidence,” said Nasrallah. It has no credibility whatever. No legitimate court would accept it.

“Those who were indicted should not be called ‘charged’ but unjustly treated,” Nasrallah stressed.

Earlier he said Washington “pushed” for indictment. Americans controlled (its) form and content.” Israel had its say.

“We will not allow our reputation and our honor to be touched,” Nasrallah stressed.

STL lied saying Badreddine was in charge of killing Hariri. Ayyash headed the hit team, it added. No evidence whatever suggests Hezbollah’s involvement.

Plenty indicts Israel. Targeted killings are an Israeli specialty. Eliminating opponents predated Israel’s creation.

Future prime ministers were involved. They headed Jewish terrorist groups. Menachem Begin led Irgun. Yitzhak Shamir was a Lehi (Stern Gang) leader.

Before and after May 1948, thousands of targeted killings occurred or were attempted. Most aren’t remembered today. Others won’t be forgotten.

In November 1944, Lehi murdered Lord Moyne. He was Britain’s Middle East minister of state. He was killed near his Cairo home.

In September 1948, Lehi assassins killed UN mediator Folke Bernadotte. They did so in Jerusalem. Yitzhak Shamir personally approved his murder.

In July 1946, Irgun bombed Jerusalem’s King David Hotel. Ninety-two Brits, Arabs and Jews were massacred. Another 58 were wounded.

Future prime minister David Ben-Gurion approved the bombing. He led the Jewish Agency at the time.

Israel’s entire history is blood-drenched. It reflects crimes of war, against humanity, genocide, and numerous targeted assassinations.

It includes massacres like Deir Yassin. On April 9, 1948, Irgun and Lehi killers slaughtered over 120 defenseless Palestinian men, women and children.

Houses were machine-gunned randomly. Villagers were killed in cold blood. Survivors were assembled outside. They were shot at point blank range.

Children and infants were murdered like adults. So were elderly and infirm Palestinians. No mercy was shown.

It was typical Israeli viciousness. Ensuing fighting killed dozens more. Many other villages were attacked the same way.

Ethnic cleansing involves mass slaughter and displacement. Leaders are targeted for elimination. Death squads kill without mercy.

Mossad credentials are notorious. Its record is indisputable. Its expertise is acknowledged.

Its rap sheet includes targeted assassinations, satellite, drone and other type spying, hacking and espionage, computer viruses, other cyber attacks, bombings, sabotage, and other lawless practices.

Hariri’s assassination was classic Mossad. Hezbollah obtained compelling video and audio evidence.

It intercepted Israeli aerial surveillance footage. It did so of routes Hariri used on his assassination day. At the time, Nasrallah said:

“We have definite information on the aerial movements of the Israeli enemy the day Hariri was murdered.”

“(A)n Israeli drone was (observed) surveying the Sidon-Beirut-Junieh coastline as warplanes were flying over Beirut.”

(V)ideo (evidence) can be acquired by any investigative commission to ensure it is correct. We are sure of this evidence, or else we would not risk showing it.”

Israeli spies infest Lebanon. Captured ones admitted Israel’s responsibility for killing Hariri.

At the time, criminal law expert/Professor Hasan Jouni called Hezbollah’s evidence compelling.

“Logically and legally…any new finding should be investigated by the general prosecutor,” he said.

“Nasrallah submitted tangible evidence of the Israeli potential role in Hariri’s assassination.”

It appears incriminating. “Furthermore, the previous investigations which were circulated here and there should be revised.”

North Lebanon Bar Association head Antoine Airout agreed, saying:

“Nasrallah’s revelations are very serious and objective.” Washington/Israeli manipulated proceedings ignored it.

Cui bono is key. Syria had nothing to gain. Nor did Hezbollah. They had plenty to lose. Israel, of course, benefits hugely. So does Washington.

Middle East expert Sam Hamod said earlier:

“We must do as they do in other criminal cases, look at who had the most to gain. The Lebanese (and Hezbollah) had a lot to lose, as did the Syrians.

“No matter where else you look, no one else had anything to gain except Israel and the US.”

“America quickly (distanced itself) as did Israel, which was tantamount to convicting themselves because they are the only two countries that would gain by creating unrest in Lebanon.”

At the time, Middle East journalist Patrick Seale agreed, saying:

“If Syria (or Hezbollah) killed (Hariri), it must be judged an act of political suicide.” Doing so would “hand (their) enemies a weapon with which to deliver (a destabilizing) blow.”

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
The match is HOT and NOW is the time to strike!
January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:
Stew Webb Founder Solutions for America Get involved
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
Stew Webb Youtube
JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved


Let’s shine a light into the ICC’s dusty corners…


When will the Palestinians clear the decks for action?

by  Stuart Littlewood

I watched the Palestinian ambassador, Prof Manuel Hassassian’s performance before a session of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee enquiring into ‘Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories: prospects for 2014′. .

He was asked by MP Rory Stewart: “Why did you come back to the negotiating table?” Hassassian replied: “The PLO since 1988 has committed itself to the recognition of the state of Israel and to a two-state solution. And in 1993 we reiterated our commitment believing that the only way out of this conflict is by negotiation.”

This belief, he seemed to be saying, persists despite Israel not complying with agreements that had been signed and despite the Palestinian government not knowing what the future holds if Israel continues with its expansionist policies – and especially its illegal ‘settlement’ programme – which it clearly will do unless firmly checked.

Throughout he was careful not to mention the international law option, nor did he utter the dreaded “J” word (Justice), as far as I recall.

Given the decades of painful failure trying to find a way through the ‘peace process’ cul-de-sac, switching focus to the International Criminal Court, as suggested in the ‘Sabeel’ letter, makes sense (see recent article Help prod the ICC into action over Israel’s illegal settlements – The Palestinian leadership won’t do it – will you?’). The letter campaign urges the ICC to investigate the many charges of war crimes relating to Israel’s ‘settlements’ on territory under its “belligerent occupation” and the transfer of large numbers of the Israeli population into them.

The letter arrived in my inbox out of the blue with an invitation to copy, sign and post it to the ICC. Efforts to trace its origin have failed, although it seems to have come from Sabeel’s autumn conference in Jerusalem. No matter, it adds up, makes sense and hits the nail on the head.

The authors are evidently tired of waiting while Israel’s encroachments and brutality continue. The thrust is to persuade the ICC, in the absence of any positive move by the PA/PLO, to take the lead using the mountain of evidence assembled by various UN bodies and, of course, Goldstone.



Granted, there may be only a slim chance of such a thing happening, but it is important to explore the possibility in the hope that those with a stake will join together and make “public expressions”, as someone put it. It would at least unite the different strands of sympathy and support in a purposeful way.

But not everyone agrees with the ‘Sabeel’ initiative. A law professor wrote to say that the Office of the Prosecutor will not consider investigating Israeli crimes “until  the new Palestinian leadership either files another ad hoc declaration or ratifies the Rome Statute”. Letters therefore would be better addressed to the Palestinians themselves. “The Office of the Prosecutor will simply ignore them.”

He did not explain what he meant by a “new Palestinian leadership” or whether this was something we could look forward to in the near future.

I imagine everyone concerned is aware that the Palestinians have to do more paperwork and ratify the Rome Treaty. What angers activists is that the leadership, having been out-smarted and humiliated so many times, still don’t appear to have cleared the decks for action.

And is it not a waste of time writing to the likes of President Abbas with his record and threadbare legitimacy? The never-ending deadlock cannot remain the private playground of stooges and quislings. Many campaigners therefore feel that engaging international law should have been done from the start, and publicising such a move now will highlight the absurdity of the current situation and set the ball rolling in a more productive direction.

Nothing else has succeeded in 66 years. And if the Office of the Prosecutor does, in the end, ignore the concerns of civil society, that will make headline news which should serve as an springboard if handled properly.

Another critic says that according to his reading of the Rome Statute the ICC has no legal powers to undertake legal actions against Israel, and Palestine cannot approach the ICC for crimes committed before 29 November 2012, the date the UN General Assembly upgraded Palestine’s status to “non-member observer state”.

Even if the scope is limited to crimes since November 2012, isn’t the effort worth it

Time the law kicked in

A third critic has suggested that the proper course would be to bring pressure on all governments to demand that Israel abide by already agreed principles. Ending the Occupation and removing the settlements must come first. “To demand that a defenceless occupied people negotiate, under fearful duress, with their oppressor flies in the face of natural justice.”

That might be the ideal course, but is civil society sufficiently organised and orchestrated to apply the necessary pressure on world governments? Yet another argued that nothing should be done until the present round of talks has finished, in case we undermine them.

Aside from the fact that the Israelis have utterly destroyed any credibility the talks might have had, the process is due to end in April, which is not far off, and chief negotiator Saeb Erekat has sworn it will not be extended by even one minute.

In the meantime the PA must prepare if they are to be  ready to file claims at the ICC in May. There is no sign that a start has been made, so we might as well give them a gentle poke. And campaigners might as well notify the ICC that it’s time the law kicked in.

‘No authoritative explanation of ICC passivity…’

Critics might like to read what another law professor, UN special rapporteur Richard Falk, recently said in an interview with me……

Q – How acceptable is it for a weak, demoralized and captive people like the Palestinians to be forced to the negotiation table with their brutal occupier under the auspices of a US administration seen by many people as too dishonest to play the part of peace broker?

Richard Falk – Even if the United States was acting in good faith, for which there is no evidence, its dual role as Israel’s unconditional ally and as intermediary would subvert the credibility of a negotiating process. In fact, the US Government signals its partisanship by White House appointments of individuals overtly associated with the AIPAC lobbying group as Special Envoys to oversee the negotiations such as Dennis Ross and Martin Indyk…  The unsatisfactory nature of the current framework of negotiations is further flawed by weighting the process in favor of Israel, which enjoys a position of hard power dominance.

Q – There can be no peace without justice, so is it right for final status ‘negotiations’ to be held before competing claims are tested in the courts and the many outstanding rulings under international law and UN resolutions are implemented? In any case, shouldn’t a neutral UN peace commission be supervising the final settlement of this long struggle, rather than the US or the Quartet?

Richard Falk – Yes, if the priority were to attain a just and sustainable peace, a framework would be developed that had two characteristics: neutral as between the two sides and sensitive to the relevance of rights under international law. Such sensitivity would favor the Palestinians as their main grievances are all reinforced by an objective interpretation of international law, including in relation to settlements, Jerusalem, refugees, borders, water.

Q –  Turning to the role of the International Criminal Court, this is an organ of the UN. So why doesn’t the ICC initiate its own prosecution of Israeli crimes based on UN reports and the mountain of evidence available to it, especially in view of Palestine’s upgraded status?

Richard Falk – There is no authoritative explanation of ICC passivity in face of the Israeli criminal violation of fundamental Palestinian rights. As a matter of speculation it is plausible to assume an absence of political will on the part of the prosecutor’s office to initiate an investigation that would be deeply opposed by Israel and the United States.

In the long struggle for justice more leverage must be found…. BDS is successful but slow, and not enough on its own. The ICC is the correct way to go if it’s justice you want, and the spotlight surely ought to shine into its dusty corners. But does anyone know for sure if the Court could take action on its own initiative?

Our politicians, however, are still happy for Kerry, Netanyahu and Abbas to ponce around the international stage indefinitely, achieving nothing except buying more time for still more injustice… and for Israel to establish the irreversible facts on the ground it needs to make the Zionist occupation permanent. The British Government especially has its head in the sand. Foreign Office minister Hugh Robertson says:

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
The match is HOT and NOW is the time to strike!
January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:
Stew Webb Founder Solutions for America Get involved
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
Stew Webb Youtube
JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved


A Brief History and Theology of Christian Zionism (Part I)



…by Jonas E. Alexis




Martin Luther

Martin Luther


Martin Luther, the leading light in the Protestant Reformation, challenged “papal authority over Christendom”[1] by dropping his 95 theses in 1517. But, as we shall see, that was not what the Protestant Reformation was all about and it was not why Luther was excommunicated.


Pope Leo longed for an amicable solution, but Luther was too far gone.[2] Not only that, the fire which Luther had lit started to spread across Germany, even among humanists.


German scholar and poet Ulrich von Hutten began to take up arms, denouncing the Catholic Church as a “gigantic bloodsucking worm” and the pope as “a bandit chief…Rome is a sea of impurity, a mire of filth, a bottomless sink of iniquity. Should we not flock from all quarters to compass the destruction of this common curse of humanity?”[3]


Hutten also declared of the German clergy,


“Begone, ye unclean swine! Depart from the sanctuary, ye infamous traffickers! Touch not the altars with your desecrated hands!…How dare you spend the money intended for pious uses in luxury, dissipation, and pomp, while honest men are suffering hunger?”


Luther, of course, stayed away from Hutten’s violent tirade. But many of Luther’s statements were vague enough that many could interpret or apply them in a negative light. Luther declared,


“Above all, we should drive out from German lands the papal legates with their ‘powers’—which they sell us for large sums of money—to legalize unjust gains, dissolve oaths, vows, and agreements, saying that the pope has authority to do this.”[4]


Luther added theological error upon error by identifying the pope as “the true Antichrist” and Rome as “the Synagogue of Satan”[5] (yet if one follows Luther’s sola scriptura, there is no mention of a specific individual as the “true Antichrist,” an issue that will be covered later.)


The word “antichrist” itself is mentioned only four times in the New Testament, and it is talking about a metaphysical and categorical rejection of Christ and his deity. “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son” (1 John 2:22).


It was only a matter of time before Luther was accused of spreading the “‘Bohemian poison’ (the heresies of Huss) and subverting all ecclesiastical order.”[6]


Over time, a number of professors at the University of Wittenberg began to declare that Luther was right. At the same time, other individuals began to denounce Luther as a heretic.


In the summer of 1520, Leo X ordered some of Luther’s writings to be burned and admonished Luther once again to recant.[7] In the meantime, Luther’s movement began to spread like wildfire in places like Mainz, Louvain, Cologne, and Ingolstadt.[8] Yet in places like Erfurt, students “threw all available copies” of the bull “into the river.”[9]


Luther finally appeared before the Diet of Worms in 1521 to be questioned about his theological activity. As soon as he landed in Erfurt, a large crowd, among them forty professors, gave him a standing ovation.[10]


Ulrich von Hutten

Ulrich von Hutten


When he was asked the question, “Do you recant, or do you not?” Luther asked for, and received, a day to seriously reconsider the repercussions of his decision. During that same day, Hutten sent him a letter asking him to stand firm and unmovable. Other sympathetic friends came to comfort him.[11] That was surely a cataclysmic moment in Luther’s life.


Although Luther initially rejected indulgences on the basis of his reading of Scripture, Luther later began rejecting Scripture on the basis of his theology. This became quite clear when he stated:


“Whatever does not preach Christ is not Apostolic, even though it be written by St. Peter or St. Paul…Whatever does preach Christ would be Apostolic even if it proceeded from Judas, Pilate, or Herod.”[12]


Many of Luther’s own doctrines would certainly fail this incoherent test. Luther rejected the book of James because it was inconsistent with Luther’s view of justification by faith alone, calling it an “epistle of straw.”[13]


Luther, to his dying day, despised the book of James and wrote in Table Talk that


“We should throw the epistle of James out of this school [meaning Wittenberg], for it doesn’t amount to much. It contains not a syllable about Christ. Not once does it mention Christ, except at the beginning…

“He wrote not a word about the suffering and resurrection of Christ, although this is what all the apostles preached about. Besides, there is no order or method in the epistle. Now he discusses clothing and then he writes about wrath and is constantly shifting from one to the other.”[14]


In another work, Luther even talked about “throwing Jimmy in the stove”[15] because “Jimmy” did not agree with Luther.


In other words, Luther theologically appealed to sola scriptura, but practically was content to pick and choose what agreed with his views—a consistent pattern that has died out over the centuries among Reformed and Protestant theologians, most specifically among Christian Zionists.


James 2:26 unequivocally declares, “For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.”


Luther made things even more complicated when it comes to Romans 3:28, which reads, “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.”


Luther, right after faith, added the word “alone” in his translation. When asked for an exegetical explanation, Luther responded,


“If your Papist makes much useless fuss about the word solaallein, tell him at once: ‘Doctor Martin Luther will have it so,’ and says ‘Papist and donkey are one thing; sic volo, sic jubeo, sit pro ratione voluntas. For we do not want to be pupils and followers of the Papist, but their masters and judges.”[16]


Luther was simply shooting himself in the toes, and it is pretty clear here that he was indirectly and subtly postulating infallibility or categorical axioms without which his own theology—sola scriptura—would fall.


Yet for Luther, papal infallibility was like a red flag to a bull. He was so carnally blinded that he didn’t seem to understand what the Church meant by infallibility, a misconception that lingers on to this very day.


Sinclair B. Ferguson

Sinclair B. Ferguson


Luther did not seem to make a distinction between the Pope as a sinner and the Pope defending infallible truth—two paradoxical yet compatible tendencies. Even Reformed scholars such as Sinclair B. Ferguson agree that “the genius of Rome, unlike Wittenberg [Luther] and Geneva [Calvin], has always been its ability to hold opposite tendencies together.”[17]This is a huge issue and it serves no purpose to expand on it here.


It must be said that Rome proved to be much more rational than the father of the Protestant Reformation because ontological truth, by its very nature, is “infallible.” Any truth claim has to have some form of “infallibility,” otherwise the claim makes no sense whatsoever. This is fundamental in epistemological pursuit and Luther should have known this.


As a corollary and as G. K. Chesterton rightly put it, “all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind.”[18] In other words, the denial of any truth claim is another truth claim.


Luther’s own statement that “Doctor Martin Luther will have it so” is a classic example. And since Luther knocked out Rome’s infallibility, Luther had to implicitly establish a new infallibility, which was Luther himself.


More importantly, Luther would have had a hard time refuting people like John Hagee and the whole Christian Zionist movement. If Luther objects to their extreme Zionist worldview, they could easily say, “Dr. John Hagee would have it so.”


And when you reach that circular matrix, you can be sure that reason or rational inquiry is out of the equation and ideology or preconceived notion will take precedence. It is like reasoning with people who keep postulating that the “Jewish question” is genetic.


You’ve got people like Charles Murray and other AEI writers saying that Jews are basically smarter than everyone else, that they are “God’s chosen people” and that this is one reason they are hated;[19] and then you have others who keep positing the extraordinary assertion (with no serious evidence) that Jewish behaviors (such as how to cheat the goyim) are ingrained in their DNA.


How does that work? Which one is actually DNA—the elevated IQ which Murray proposes, or the bad behaviors which much of the world does not like? Certainly those biological determinists cannot have it both ways.


John Hagee

John Hagee


What’s so funny is that when Jewish scientists themselves argue that much of the evidence for biological determinism has been forged, biological determinists continue to marshal the same intellectually boring and incoherent view that the “Jewish question” is genetic.


What those people do not seem to grasp is that what happens genetically happens mechanically and automatically, a notion that is compatible with Newtonian physics.


If it happens according to the laws of physics and chemistry—like gravity—why would a biological determinist want to persuade the Jew to act morally? Wouldn’t the Jew be rational in saying, “My genes made me do it?”


I just cannot hold my laughter when those biological determinists write raving responses because the Jew acts this or that way and that they need to change their way, but that bad behavior is in his genes! Not only that, we have to hold them responsible!


If biological determinists cannot see this intellectual logjam, then rational discussion is of no use. The Enlightenment thinkers, were they alive today, would probably have raised their hands in adulation telling biological determinists, “Amen, brothers! Preach it! Thanks for making our metaphysical view comprehensible to modernity!”


If Christ did not accept the doctrine of the Pharisees who kept saying that they are the children of Abraham—implying super DNA—then the idea as articulated by biological determinists must be resisted precisely because it lacks scientific integrity and intellectual honesty. The issue is essentially theological and moral. As E. Michael Jones pointed out,


“The culture wars are simply not understandable in racial terms [or genetic terms]. The different sides in the culture wars may have used race as a pretext, but the identity of the antagonists was ethnic not racial in the sense commonly portrayed in the media.”[20]


This is the central issue, and if people want to understand the “Jewish question,” they must get a grip of the theological underpinning. The first institution to understand this is the Church. Jewish revolutionaries are aware of this.


Leo Pfeffer

Leo Pfeffer


For example, Leo Pfeffer, a Jewish revolutionary who “advised, planned and argued more church-state cases before the U.S. Supreme Court than anyone else in American history,” wrote,


“whenever I felt that my daughter should not have something she wanted, she threatened to marry a Catholic army officer from Alabama.


“The truth of the matter was that I did not like the Catholic Church as I did not like the military and the South and for pretty much the same reasons. In the first place, it stood for what I opposed, and opposed . . . what I stood for.”[21]


Biological determinists, because of their superficial knowledge of the conflict, categorize the “Jewish question” in essentially racial terms when in fact the issue always revolves theology and morality. If they doubt the seriousness of this statement, they need to go back to the Elizabethan Age and see how the issue played out.


If that is too hard to do, they need to go back to ancient Rome, where the theatrical spectacle of the gladiatorial games almost destroyed the moral life of one of Augustine’s closest friends, Alypius.[22]


More precisely, biological determinists need to go back to ancient Greece, where all the major players were essentially “white,” and where the cult of Dionysus was essentially terrorizing young people—most particularly women.[23]




After comparing himself to Paul, Luther called all of those who disagreed with his insertion “donkeys” and boasted that regardless of what they said, “the word allein shall remain in my New Testament.”[24]


It is no surprise that the Protestant Reformation was bound to spark a detour in the Christian West. Whether he liked it or not, with statements like that, Luther opened the door for people to apply their own presuppositions onto Christianity.


And it would not be an irrational argument to say that the Dispensational movement that grew out of the nineteenth century had it proto-basis in the Protestant Reformation, although Luther would almost disagree strongly with the movement.


Luther also “questioned the Epistle of Hebrews” and even declared that the book of Revelation is “neither Apostolic nor Prophetic.”[25] He also stated that “Solomon’s proverbs were not the work of Solomon.”[26]


bondageBy doing this picking and choosing, Luther proved that his critics were right all along: Luther did not really believe in sola scriptura. Even Luther’s widely read treatise, On the Bondage of the Will, published in 1525, could not find explicit and strong support from sola scriptura or reason. It is that book that is the quintessential definition of the Reformation. Luther himself declared,


“Indeed, let me tell you, this is the hinge on which our discussion turns, the crucial issue between us.”[27]


Calvinist writer J. I. Packer writes that the book is “the greatest piece of writing that came from Luther’s pen.” Prior to Luther, the Catholic Church maintains that man’s will is a gift from God and a person cannot even use this gift to earn his salvation. Canon 4 of the Council of Orange, which was written in 529 A.D.,  states:


“If anyone maintains that God awaits our will to be cleansed from sin, but does not confess that even our will to be cleansed comes to us through the infusion and working of the Holy Spirit, he resists the Holy Spirit himself…”


Moreover, since man’s free will is a gift from God, it therefore cannot contradict God’s overarching purpose in salvation. Luther changed that by making man’s free will irrelevant and unimportant in salvation, and this is why Luther was excommunicated by the Catholic Church.




calvinIn his preface to the German Bible written in 1522, Luther made it clear that the book of Revelation is “neither apostolic or prophetic” and therefore stated,


“I can in nothing detect that it was provided by the Holy Spirit.”


Luther denounced the pope as being dogmatic, but Luther is making dogmatic statements that obviously contradict his own theological premise, namely sola scriptura. Luther continued:


“Moreover, he [John] seems to be going much too far when he commends his own book so highly—more than any other of the sacred books do, though they are much more important…


Let everyone think of it as his own spirit gives him to think. My spirit cannot fit itself into the book. There is one sufficient reason for me to think highly of it—Christ is not taught or known in it; but to teach Christ is the thing which an apostle above all else is bound to do.”[28]


Right here Luther was digging his own theological grave and was disqualifying himself as an exegete. The first two verses open the book as follows:


“The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John; who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw” (Revelation 1:1-2).


Luther would have saved himself some trouble had he just made an honest confession that he did not understand the book.


Yet to say that it is not apostolic or prophetic, or that Christ is not taught in the book, means that Luther to a large extent applied sola scriptura where it fit his theology.


In his new preface written in 1546, Luther was somewhat more optimistic declaring that the book could be examined in light of historical accounts.[29]


In a nutshell, Luther was not consistent on his appeal to sola scriptura, and he was already a flesh-and-blood Judaizer by the time he wrote On the Jews and Their Lies, a book we shall discuss in the next article. It is the same thing with John Calvin, who ended up disagreeing with Luther on soteriology.




“defiance at Worms, and his survival, had given his followers a heady elation. At Erfurt students, artisans, and peasants attacked and demolished forty parish houses, destroyed libraries and rent rolls, and killed a humanist (June 1521).”[30]


In December of the same year, “some students and townsfolk, armed with knives, entered the parish church of Wittenberg, drove the priests from the altars, and stoned some worshipers who were praying before a statue of the Virgin.”


reformationThe next day, “forty students demolished the altars of the Franciscan monastery in Wittenberg.”[31] That same year, “Gabriel Zwilling, a leader of the Augustinian Congregation, invited his hearers to burn religious pictures and demolish altars wherever found. On December 27 oil was poured upon the fire by ‘prophets’ arriving from Zwickau.”[32]


Luther of course did not approve any of this violence. He later wroteEarnest Exhortation for All Christians, Warning Them Against Insurrection and Rebellion. Yet in the very same work, Luther could not fully make his point clear that violence is against Christ and the gospel. Instead he wrote:


“It seems probable that there is danger of an uprising, and that priests, monks, bishops and the entire spiritual estate may be murdered or driven into exile, unless they seriously and thoroughly reform themselves.


“For the common man has been brooding over the injury he has suffered in property, in body, and in soul, and has become provoked. They have tried him too far, and have most unscrupulously burdened him beyond measure.


“He is neither able nor willing to endure it longer, and could indeed have good reason to lay about him with flails and cudgels, as the peasants are threatening to do. Now I am not at all displeased to hear that the clergy are brought to such a state of fear and anxiety. Perhaps they will come to their senses and moderate their mad tyranny…I will go further.


“If I had ten bodies, and could acquire so much favor with God that he would chasten them [the clergy] by the gentle means of bodily death or insurrection, I would most gladly give all my ten bodies to death in behalf of the poor peasants.”[33]


Luther, however, included other statements, saying things such as


“insurrection is unreasoning, and generally hurts the innocent more than the guilty. Hence no insurrection is ever right, no matter how good the cause in whose interest it is made.


“The harm resulting from it always exceeds the amount of reformation accomplished…My sympathies are and always will be with those against whom insurrection is made.”[34]


It appeared that Luther was talking out of both sides of his mouth, and there is no doubt that those people who were eager for revolution found in Luther’s writings things that would ignite the revolutionary fire.


Preaching against indulgences is one thing, but making statements contradicting the Cross of Christ is quite another. In fact, the Jews, who had no interest in the person of Jesus Christ, not only applauded Luther but aligned with him.


durantNumerous Jews were elated when they heard of the Reformation, not because they wanted to embrace Christianity to its full, but because it was a chance to ally themselves with a revolutionary theological movement. For this reason, Luther’s effort to challenge the papacy was praised by many Jews.[35]


Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, who became a Protestant, was Luther’s contemporary and friend. When Luther was in exile, Karlstadt and a number of Luther’s followers began to take action by “tearing down images of saints in churches,” but “Luther recommended moderation.”[36]


By way of mocking monks who did not get married, Karlstadt demanded that both secular priests and monks “should marry and procreate. Karlstadt set a pace by marrying, at forty, a girl of fifteen (January 19, 1522).”


Luther approved of this marriage, but he wrote: “‘Good Heavens! Will our Wittenbergers give wives to monks?’”[37] Luther himself “had forced [the revolutionary Thomas] Muntzer out of Saxony, for he feared the consequences of his teachings.”[38]


Muntzer pushed the envelope even further by agitating the workers in Bohemia, close to the place where the Hussites started their revolution. An ardent supporter of the Reformation, Muntzer thought that he and his associates, Nicholas Storch and Marcus Stubner, should be the arbiters of interpretation and exegesis.[39]


Luther dropped the bomb of sola scriptura, and Muntzer electrified it and turned it into a revolutionary act. Luther, then, began to see that sola scriptura had been challenged by Muntzer.[40]


In 1521, these three—Muntzer, Storch, and Stubner—tried to start an insurrection, but as soon as it was demolished, they fled. Muntzer ended up being a pastor in Allstedt, while Storch and Stubner landed in Wittenberg.[41]


But Karlstadt still had some work to do. “When the agents of the council proved dilatory in removing images, Karlstadt led his followers into the churches; pictures and crucifixes were torn from the walls, and resisting priests were pelted with stones.”[42]


By this time, Luther realized that he was the one who had released the revolutionaries to commit violence. Luther therefore “called on the princes to suppress” it.[43]


Durant declares, “Luther, the preachers, and the pamphleteers were not the cause of the revolt; the causes were the just grievances of the peasantry. But it could be argued that the gospel of Luther and his more radical followers ‘poured oil on the flames,’ and turned the resentment of the oppressed into utopian delusions, uncalculated violence, and passionate revenge.”[44]


By 1522, Luther seemed to have foreseen that the battle was going to turn into bloody acts of violence, and he began to formulate a series of sermons denouncing violent acts, saying things like “the sun, the moon, the stars, have been worshipped; shall we then pluck them out of the sky?”[45] Durant declares that Luther ‘was at his best and most Christian in those eight sermons in eight days.”[46]


At other times, Luther would preach that the peasants should not raise up arms. He wrote in part,


“For no matter how right you are, it is not for a Christian to appeal to law, or to fight, but to suffer wrong and endure evil; there is no other way…Christians fight for themselves not with sword and gun, but with the cross and suffering, just as Christ, our leader, does not bear a sword, but hangs upon the cross.”[47]


It seemed that this admonition was too late. Muntzer, Karlstadt, and others were already putting more oil in the flames by postulating that “farmers, miners, and cornthreshers understand the Gospel better, and can teach it better, than a whole village…of abbots and priests…or doctors of divinity.” Karlstadt even declared that they can do it “better than Luther.”[48]


Muntzer meant it when he said that “the godless,” meaning the priests and monks, “have no right to live except in so far as they are permitted to do so by the elect.”[49]


Not only that, Muntzer called upon the princes to march against the clergy. The princes declined. Then Muntzer called upon the people—mainly the peasants—to march against both the princes and the clergy to establish what later proved to be their own heaven on earth.[50]


Muntzer of course was implicitly reformulating the principles of the Old Testament. For example, it was right to take the life of a witch in the Old Testament. Muntzer, in a similar fashion, argued that godless people should not suffer to live, most particularly when they are in conflict with Christians.[51]


These radical turns were a challenge for Luther and the Reformation.[52]


Luther expelled Muntzer from his pulpit in 1524 and even called him the “Satan of Allstedt.”[53] Muntzer, for Luther, was a minister for the devil who was on his way to hell—he believed that heresy and acts of violence ran through Muntzer’s veins.[54]


Muntzer in turn started calling Luther names such as Dr. Liar, Father Pyssyfoot, a carrion crow, the Wittenberg Pope, and the archdevil.[55] Muntzer ended up wandering in various towns, “announcing the deliverance of ‘Israel,’ and the imminent Kingdom of Heaven on earth.”[56]


Muntzer’s message was so radical in Prague in 1521 that he convinced the Bohemians that should they fail to defend God’s word they will be invaded by the Turks the following year.[57]


Eventually he won the ears of many, and in 1525 he and Pfeiffer and their followers “drove out the monks, and appropriated all the property of the Church.”[58]


Muntzer again lusted after more blood, telling his followers, “Forward while the fire is hot! Let your swords be ever warm with blood!”[59]




mcgrathBy August 1524, Muntzer’s army was gathering momentum, and with the help of Hans Muller, 30,000 peasants refused to pay taxes. By April of the following year, Muntzer was still preaching revolution, telling his disciples things like


“show no pity…Pay no attention to the cries of the godless…Alert the villages and towns and especially the mineworkers and other good fellows who will be of use. We cannot slumber any longer…Don’t let your sword grow cold, don’t let it hang down limply! Hammer away ding-dong on the anvils of Nimrod [meaning the princes], cast their tower to the ground!


“As long as they live it is impossible for you to rid yourselves of the fear of men. One cannot say anything to you about God as long as they rule over you. Go to it, go to it, while it is day! God goes before you; follow, follow!”[60]


References to the Old Testament with respect to dealing with the “godless” were rampant in many of Muntzer’s sermons.


Certainly things were not going well for Luther. The peasant leaders sent Luther twelve articles in which they disagreed with many of the teachings and practices of the clergy. Luther did not approve their articles, but he had been given a chance to completely dissociate himself from the revolutionaries. Instead, he wrote:


“We have no one on earth to thank for this mischievous rebellion except you, princes and lords, and especially you blind bishops and mad priests and monks, whose hearts are hardened against the Holy Gospel, though you know that it is true and that you cannot refute it.”[61]


Finally, in an attempt to encourage peace, Luther gave this address, which the peasants failed to follow:


“Choose among the nobles certain counts and lords, and from the cities certain councilmen, and have these matters dealt with and settled in a friendly way. You lords, let down your stubbornness…and give up a little of your tyranny and oppression, so that poor people get air and room to live.


“The peasants for their part should let themselves be instructed, and give over and let go some of the Articles that grasp too far and too high.”[62]


The peasants, believing that Luther had betrayed them, moved along with the violent revolution anyway.[63] It was inevitable, then, that many would put some blame on Luther for the peasants’ revolt and the rebellious and violent nature of it. A large number of peasants, in turn, believed that Luther had deserted them.[64]


By the spring of 1525, the fire was already ignited in many major places such as Heilbronn, Rothenburg, and Wurzburg.[65] In March in Rothenburg,


“the priests were driven from the cathedral, religious images were demolished, a chapel was smashed to the ground, and clerical wine cellars were emptied with triumphant gaiety.”[66]


The following month, under the lead of Jakob Wehe,


“3,000 peasants captured the town [of Leipheim on the Danube near Ulm] drank all discoverable wine, pillaged the church, smashed the organ, made themselves leggings from sacerdotal vestments, and paid mock homage to one of their number seated on the altar and robed as a priest.”[67]


protestantleadersDurant declares that


“in nearly every section of Germany peasant bands were running riot. Monasteries were sacked, or were compelled to pay high ransoms…On April 11 the townsfolk of Bamberg renounced the bishop’s feudal sovereignty, pillaged and burned his castle, and plundered the houses of the orthodox.


“In Alsace the revolt spread so rapidly that by April’s end every Catholic or rich landlord in the province was in terror of his life. On April 28 an army of 20,000 peasants attacked Zabern, seat of the bishop of Strasbourg, and despoiled his monastery.”[68]


These violent acts happened in almost every major city. For example, former Episcopal secretary Michael Gasmaier incited an attack on all orthodox clergymen and even “sacked the local monastery, and remained rampant and unsubdued for a year.”[69]


We see similar results at Freiburgim-Breisgau, where “the peasants looted castles and monasteries, and forced the city to join the ‘Evangelical Brotherhood.’ In the same month a peasant band drove the bishop of Wurzburg out of his palace, and feasted on his stores. In June the powerful and warlike Archbishop Matthias Lang was chased from his palace in Salzburg into his castle fortress overlooking the city.”[70]




Now that the revolution had turned into a bloodbath, Luther forthrightly rejected it. He declared,


“In the former book I did not venture to judge the peasants, since they had offered to be set right and be instructed…But before I look around they, forgetting their offer, betake themselves to violence, and particular it is the work of the archdevil [Munzer] who rules at Mulhausen…


“Any man against whom sedition can be proved is outside the law of God and the Empire, so that the first who can slay him is doing right and well…


“Therefore let everyone who can smite, slay, and stab, secretly or openly, remembering that nothing can be more poisonous, hurtful, or devilish than a rebel. It is just as when one must kill a mad dog; if you do not strike him he will strike you, and a whole land with you.”[71]


Here again Luther was regurgitating what he had learned from the Old Testament, not from what he had learned at the foot of the Cross and from the doctrines of Christ. Moreover, as Protestant scholar Alister McGrath himself argues, Luther and the other Reformers were pragmatists in that on many occasions they were ready to allow secular government to be involved in the movement, so long as it advanced the cause.[72]


If that is the case, then Luther once again was largely inconsistent, for we all know that secular authorities have no say in theological disputes.


It is clear that the Reformation was much more complex and it cannot be reduced to just the motto of sola scriptura, for “a secondary hermeneutic of political character was at least on occasion instrumental in [its] propagation.”[73]


McGrath agrees, stating that it is “evident that the question of how the early Reformed theological communities interpreted Scripture was more problematic than is sometimes appreciated.”[74]


The peasant revolt was eventually crushed. In May 1525, Duke Henry and Philip Landgrave marched against Muntzer’s untrained and disordered peasant army and massacred thousands outside Frankenhausen.[75]


When Henry and Landgrave’s army reached the town, they pleaded to the rebels to surrender. Muntzer told the peasants that God would deliver them in the nick of time, using the sign of a halo around the sun.


Muntzer could not have been more excited, and incited the rebels even more to stand still and meet the enemy head on.[76]


In the end, thousands were killed, while Henry and Landgrave only lost six men. Durant says only 5,000 rebels were killed,[77] but Carter Lindberg says over 6,000 lost their lives.[78] Three hundred others were captured and condemned to death.


“Their women pleaded mercy for them; it was granted, on condition that the women should beat out the brains of two priests who had encouraged the revolt; it was done, while the triumphant dukes looked on.


“Muntzer hid, was captured, was tortured into confessing the error of his ways, and was beheaded before the headquarters of the princes.


“Pfeiffer and his 1,200 soldiers defended Muhlhausen; they were overcome; Pfeiffer and other leaders were put to death, but the citizens were spared on paying a total ransom of 40,000 guilders,” nearly $1 million at the time.[79]


Other rebellions were also crushed. Truchsess led his army to Boblingen, where he tricked the peasants and burned the place to the ground, while he


“slowly roasted Jacklein Rohrbach, who had directed the ‘Massacre of Weinsberg.’”[80]


Truchsess continued to march to other places such as Konigshofen and Ingolstadt, where he “beheaded eighty-one chosen rebels as a memento for the rest.”[81]


One after another, each city or town that the peasants had taken by force was eventually retaken by massacring almost every one that came their way.


Twenty thousand peasants lost their lives in Alsace, while others ended up surrendering to the opposing army, many of whom were hanged or beheaded, or had their hands chopped off and their eyes gouged out.


Durant declares that “the air of the towns was fetid with the stench of the dead.”[82] In the face of such cruel punishment, the princes eventually had to intervene in order to diminish the level of torture that was being done.[83]


The following year, 1526, Michael Gasmaier again flared up the revolutionary spirit. He started by calling anyone who was not a protestant “godless” and claiming that they needed to be put to death. He marched into churches and tore down their pictures and shrines.


Although Gasmaier defeated many of the troops that were sent against him, in the end he had to flee to Italy.


“The Archduke Ferdinand set a price on his head, and two Spanish cutthroats earned the sum by assassinating him in his room in Padua (1528).”[84]


Once again rebellions like these caused huge loss of life.


“Over 50,000 homeless peasants roamed the highways or hid in the woods. Widows and orphans were legion…


“The rebels had in many instances burned the charters that recorded their feudal dues; new charters were now drawn up, renewing the obligations, sometimes more leniently, sometimes more rigorously, than before…elsewhere serfdom was strengthened, and would continue, east of the Elbe, till the nineteenth century.”[85]


Durant, a philo-Semitic historian, declares,


“The Reformation itself almost perished in the Peasants’ War. Despite Luther’s disclaimers and denunciations, the rebellion had flaunted Protestant colors and ideas: economic aspirations were dressed in phrases that Luther had sanctified.”[86]


Luther declared,


“My opinion is that it is better that all peasants be killed than that the princes and magistrates perish, because the rustics took the sword without divine authority.”[87]


He moved on to say in An Open Letter Concerning the Hard Book against the Peasants that


“The rulers ought to seize these people by the cap and make them hold their tongues. If they think this answer is too hard, and that this is talking violence and only shutting men’s mouths, I reply that this is right. A rebel is not worth answering with arguments, for he does not accept them. The answer for such mouth is a fist that brings blood from the nose. The peasants would not listen…


“Their ears must be unbuttoned with bullets, till their heads jump off their shoulders. Such pupils need such a rod. He who will not hear God’s Word when it is spoken with kindness must listen to the headsman when comes with his axe…


“Of mercy I will neither hear nor know anything, but give heed to God’s will in His Word…If He will have wrath and not mercy, what have you to do with mercy? Did not Saul sin by showing mercy upon Amalek when he failed to execute God’s wrath as he had been commanded?


“You who are praising mercy so highly because the peasants are beaten, why did you not praise it when the peasants were raging, smiting, robbing, burning, and plundering, until they were terrible to men’s eyes and ears? Why were they not merciful to the princes and lords, whom they wanted to wipe out entirely?”[88]


It is clear by now those teachings did not come from Christ but from the Old Testament. Luther cannot have it both ways—he cannot argue for sola scriptura and still be inconsistent when it comes to following Christ all the way. Protestant scholar Justo L. Gonzalez declares that Luther “urged the victorious princes to be merciful.”[89]


If that is the case, then Luther was once again inconsistent in his writings. How can the princes be merciful when Luther himself wrote that the peasants’ ears should be unbuttoned with bullets?


Surely Luther must have been aware of this contradiction. Perhaps his theology did not allow him to see the obvious. Throughout much of his discourse on the peasants, Luther’s sola scriptura was the Old Testament, not Christ.


Because of the devastating effect of the revolt, Luther stayed in Wittenberg for many years in solitude, not even attending at his father’s deathbed. He wrote during that time,


“All is forgotten that God has done for the world through me, now lords, priests, and peasants are all against me, and threaten my death.”[90]




Jewish revolutionaries during the Reformation period were more than happy to seize the moment. As Jewish historian Louis I. Newman declared,


“The Jews of the Reformation era took great interest in Protestant literature; Luther’s works were distributed and bought even in Jerusalem.”


Long before Luther and the Jews parted company, they previously


“looked upon the Reformation as the first indication of the advent of the Messianic age…


“One of the remarkable testimonies to the role of Jews in the spread of religious reform movements in Europe is evident in the fact that the Marranos of Amsterdam sought to disseminate Luther’s writings in Spain with a view to break the sway of the Catholicism which had brought them so much suffering.”[91]


The revolutionary acts

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
The match is HOT and NOW is the time to strike!
January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:
Stew Webb Founder Solutions for America Get involved
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
Stew Webb Youtube
JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved


Lying Zionists cover up Sharon’s horrific words, deeds


… by  Kevin Barrett, VT Editor     … with  Press TV

Ariel Sharon embodied the pure, unmitigated evil of Zionism. He was a war criminal, a terrorist, a mass murderer, a torturer, a rapist. The French term “genocidaire” also applies.

But Sharon did have one redeeming quality: He occasionally told the awful truth about himself and his country.

During the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, Sharon vented his real feelings in public.

In a Hebrew-language interview with Israeli writer Amos Oz, Sharon said:

“Even today I volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expel and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug out from underneath the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it means blowing up a few synagogues, I don’t care. And I don’t mind if after the job is done you put me in front of a Nuremberg Trial and then jail me for life. Hang me if you want, as a war criminal… What your kind doesn’t understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it.”


The interview was published in Hebrew in the Israeli newspaper Davar on December 17th, 1982, later reprinted in a book. The Sharon quotes were attributed to “Z,” a high-level, heavy-set, 50-year-old Israeli officer “with a certain history” who was also a prosperous farmer. Israeli readers knew that “Z” was obviously Ariel Sharon, who perfectly fit the description, and whose real feelings about the subjects discussed in the interview were not exactly a state secret.

At the time, Sharon had just been fired as Defense Minister due to the international outcry over the Sabra and Shatila massacres. This was obviously the “certain history” referred to. No Israeli reader or journalist at the time had the slightest doubt that “Z” was Sharon.


Why did Sharon risk venting his real feelings under such a transparent veil?

Because he thought he had nothing to lose. At the time, everyone assumed Sharon’s political and military career was finished. He had, after all, just orchestrated and supervised one of the ugliest and most brutal massacres in human history – and been caught red-handed and disgraced. It seemed likely that he would either be executed, imprisoned for life, or at least live out the rest of his life hiding from Interpol.


In the Oz interview, Sharon lashed out at the liberal Zionists who were throwing him to the dogs. He felt these liberal Zionists were hypocrites who were just as guilty of genocide as he was, but too cowardly to admit it. In this he was right.


Sharon actually bragged about being evil:


“Tell me, do the evil men of this world have a bad time? They hunt and catch whatever they feel like eating. They don’t suffer from indigestion and are not punished by Heaven. I want Israel to join that club. Maybe the world will then at last begin to fear us instead of feeling sorry. Maybe they will start to tremble, to fear our madness instead of admiring our nobility.

Let them tremble, let them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are a savage country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go wild, that we might start World War Three just like that, or that we might one day go crazy and burn all the oil fields in the Middle East. Personally, I don’t want to be any better than Harry Truman who snuffed out half a million Japanese with two fine bombs.”


" Isn't that special! " - from Saturday Night Live

” Isn’t that special! ” – from Saturday Night Live


Paradoxically, Sharon’s interview with Oz may have helped save his political career. Many Israelis identified with Sharon’s sentiments and admired his bluntness. As Israel turned to the right, Sharon and his ideas became increasingly mainstream.


By the 1990s, Sharon had returned to center-stage in the Likud government of Benjamin Netanyahu.


Though his brutal words in the Oz interview had helped pave the way for his comeback – and were a net asset in domestic politics, given the genocidal sentiments of the average Israeli – they were a huge liability for someone who wanted to be Prime Minister and appear on the international stage.


Pressure was applied to Amos Oz. When an American journalist named Holger Jensen accurately reproduced the Sharon “Z” quotes in an article published in 2002, the Zionist Liars Lobby went into action. Suddenly, Oz (a dedicated Zionist himself) quite absurdly denied that “Z” was – as everyone in Israel knew and still knows – the butcher of Sabra and Shatila, Ariel Sharon.


That didn’t prevent the truth-teller from being punished. Holger Jensen was subjected to the Zionist equivalent of a journalistic lynching. To save his skin, he was forced to half-sincerely recant his attribution of the quote to Sharon, even though he obviously doubts the veracity of Oz’s disingenuous denial.


Here is another revealing quote attributed to Sharon :


“I vow that I’ll burn every Palestinian child that will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child are more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child’s existence infers that generations will go on…”


This quote, from an interview by Ouze Merham, has been disputed by the Zionists… which speaks for its likely authenticity! In any case, it accurately describes Sharon’s policies and actions. Under Sharon, the Israeli Defense Forces had a de facto official policy of “enticing Palestinian children like mice into a trap to murder them for sport,” as journalist Chris Hedges described it in his 2001 article “Gaza Diary.”


The sport-shootings of children that Hedges witnessed are official Israeli policy; a British Medical Journal study a few years later confirmed more than 600 sniper murders of Palestinian children by the Israeli military.


The Zionist propaganda machine, which dominates Western media, works overtime to “scrub” such facts from public consciousness, just as it works to scrub the public record clean of Ariel Sharon’s too-revealing words. An apparent Mossad spin-off called CAMERA does much of the dirty work.


CAMERA has published outrageous lies about Sharon’s “Z” interview with Amos Oz. Now it is offering an even more ridiculous lie about Sharon’s notorious post-9/11 “We Jews control America” outburst.


In early October of 2001, three weeks after 9/11, Shimon Peres had been pressuring Ariel Sharon to respect American calls for a ceasefire, lest the Americans turn against Israel. According to a BBC News report, a furious Sharon turned toward Peres, saying:


“Every time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”


The report was picked up by

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
The match is HOT and NOW is the time to strike!
January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:
Stew Webb Founder Solutions for America Get involved
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
Stew Webb Youtube
JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved


Seattle TV all day live interviews Dr Preston James and Stew Webb


January 16, 2014 Will Wilson interviews Dr. Preston James and Stew Webb subject the Alien agenda.

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
The match is HOT and NOW is the time to strike!
January 2014 America you have one year to take back your Government Solutions below:
Stew Webb Founder Solutions for America Get involved
Recall Your Congress and Senate
The Recall Sword Used Against Those that Violate the U.S. Constitution!
Stew Webb Youtube
JB Campbell Solutions for America Get involved


flagususmcflag france_flag

You can Mute the Audio


Stew Webb Radio Network Store

President Donald Trump, Drain the Swamp and Lock them Up Sir.

Stew Webb Whistle blower Grand Jury Demand Still Active against Hillary Clinton aka "HildaBeast".
Bush, Obama, Clinton Founders of ISIS, ISIL, See Obama Video July 2015
George W. Bush Faces War Crimes December 12 2016 In U.S. Federal Court

(C) Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) Organized Crime Boss Hog Larry Mizel

911 World Trade Center Bush Guilty

Stew Webb

Spot Dog is on the loose he loves to eat Illuminati, Zionist, Satanists and Lying Media Political Whores.
Stew Webb 32 Years a Federal Whistle blower
Stew Webb served in the United States Marine Corps and was Honorable Discharge. Stew was a General Contractor-Home Builder until 3 car crashes in one year and is now disabled. Stew turned Federal Whistle blower-Activist of 31 years and has been a guest on over 3,000 Radio and TV Programs since September 18, 1991 and now has his own Radio and TV Network Stew was responsible for the Congressional Investigations and hearings that lead to the Appointment of Independent Prosecutor Arlin Adams in the 1989 HUD Hearings, the Silverado Savings and Loan Hearings, the Denver International Airport Frauds hearings, the MDC Holdings, Inc. (MDC-NYSE) Illegal Political Campaign Money Laundering Colorado’s biggest case aka Keating 5 hearings and the information provided that lead to the 2008 Illegal Bank Bailout.
Stew was held as a Political Prisoner from 1992-1993 to silence his exposure by Leonard Millman his former in law with illegal charges of threatening harassing telephone calls charges which were dismissed with prejudice. Leonard Millman, George HW Bush, George W Bush, Jeb Bush, Neil Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Larry Mizel, Phil Winn, Norman Brownstein, John McCain and Mitt Romney to name a few are all partners in what is known as the Bush-Millman-Clinton Organized Crime Syndicate. Leonard Millman (Deceased 2004) was member of the "Illuminati Council of 13".

Stew Webb Breaking News

Breaking News

Contributions are much appreciated

The below picture of the attempted murder of Stew Webb October 25, 2010 by two of Hillary Clinton's Assassins. There were two more crashed and attempts one year later.
Contributions are much appreciated Thank You.-- Stew Webb