[ Editor’s Note: We first ran this back in March of 2013. I knew this was a good piece, not because it was a new story…it was not.
The pretend-a-jew issue, in regards of the blood line hoax, and the fraudulent claim that “God gave us the land”, had been exposed for quite a while, and of course ignored by mass media.
But we had an Israeli genticist at John Hopkins who chose to be true to his profession and his science, and debunked the myth in a manner that could be used as expert testimony in court. Such days do not grow on trees, although we have a good number of them over a year here at VT.
But hearing this done in a Snordster reading gave me goosebumps the first time I heard it, not having known he had done an earlier one. What had happened is what we calling ‘leveraging’ in the media business, where a different kind of delivery of exactly the same words can attract a whole new batch of readers, which it did.
Our articles get copied a lot arount the planet onto other websites and blogs, so our readership count here is just a fraction of the total for the ones that take off. The only way we have to gauge how much, is to track the Google count on the article title as you get an exact count of how many places it has shown up worldwide.
This posting on VT of Snorster’s reading was up to 70,000 Google hits in about two weeks, a hell of a surprise, and one we were glad to have followed the numbers on. It showed us that even though the mainstream media ignored it, the Internet did not, and many of those we wanted to be aware for it, were. That is how we often measure our success. Did ‘the target’ get the message.
So on this Saturday night we will salute Patrick Willis and his niche artistry that he has carved out for himself, and with much gratitude from those of us who he has honored with his dramatic readings. His work will last forever, and our work will also, thanks for his extra boost. Thanks Patrick. And thanks to all the readers who spread it around…Jim W. Dean ]
The report got internet distribution internationally on websites and blogs interested in the field, but virtually no American corporate media coverage. Surprise, surprise.
Although this debate will ongoing for years to come we here at VT saw a tipping point being reached.
First, we knew that Intel agencies the world over invest significant resources in all founding myths which they feel gives them some emotional leverage control buttons to use when they wish.
For anyone out there angry at hearing about that, welcome to the real world. It’s been going on forever.
As I mentioned in my article I had a personal interest in this story as I was always amazed at how easily the world swallowed the story about a bunch of communist atheist Jews shooting their way into the Holy Land under the moral cover of ‘God gave us the Land’.
Remember now that the holocaust had not morphed yet in the a new pseudo-religion for secular Jew, which will take a separate article to cover.
Militant Zionism has always planned to cleanse the Arabs out the Land and try to pull most of the Diaspora Jews there to populate a future super power. When the ink was not dry onIsrael’s birth certificate the Zios were launching their WMD programs.
A psyops was needed not only to hustle money out of the Disapora and entice them into immigrating, they also wanted provide a smokescreen for all the nasty things they were going to be doing. ‘Coming back to the homeland’ became the founding smokescreen.
We did our usual double pump with an initial run on Press TV and another a few days later on VT. On Press TV the story started slow but picked up steam by day two. The Google count title stats on day one were 800 … 11,800 on day two, and today were 14,000 on the Press TV version and 7900 on VT, not too bad for a story on a new genetic study.
Can new genetics research uncover Founding Myth scams?
Of course we suspected the doctor did not want to wade into the geopolitical swamp, but we were only too happy to do that.
It was time, and he gave us some good openings, particularly his accusing past researcher of rigging their science. This dovetailed perfectly with what we knew had been going on behind the scenes.
But the purpose for this piece today is to highlight that we, VT, did not and cannot do this alone. We can trigger a bigger look at a story but it has to be picked up and carried by others to have any game changing impact.
Snordster quickly made this dramatic reading Youtube video of my original article. It picked up 3000 views and we have it on Gordon’s YouTube channel now.
This is a classic example where with some coordination we can leverage each other’s work to get a one and one equals five, or even ten impact out of it.
Dr. Elhait added to previous studies, I found the story in late February, Press TV and VT both posted, we got 20,000 cross postings around the Net including this great video reading from Snordster… and we have you our readers. That’s a good day.
As a Christian with faith in JESUS CHRIST my LORD and SAVIOR I see how Stupid Christians and all the other Organized Religions and their follower have become.
My Preacher or Rabbi or who ever told me that and it is GOD’s word.
Pulpit Goons have ruined GOD’s WORD and 1 in 14 who call themselves men of GOD do not have the HOLY SPIRIT are lazy and want to work 2 days per week for a paycheck.
Come up here I will pray for you leave your donation check on the way out the door and you will be one of the 200,000 rapture.
If there are 1 million preachers-pulpit goons in America and only 200.000 will be raptured then were does that leave you and your pulpit goon.
Hate to blow your belief system but if you live when the Great Tribulation hits mankind there is no rapture. The 200,000 are the Jews in the last days who come to Salvation and understand that JESUS CHRIST IS LORD and their SAVIOR.
It is time to change your way of thinking.
My Preacher said this is true.
My Mommy taught me to wipe my rear from the bottom up.
My Mommy taught me to wipe my rear from the top down.
My Mommy taught me to put the toilet paper on the roll where the paper falls from the top.
My Mommy taught me to put the toilet paper on the roll where the paper falls from the bottom.
2000 Election the Pulpit Goons told their follower’s Vote for George W. Bush he is a Born again Christian.
Does your Preacher or Pulpit goon tell you there are Millions of practicing Satanists on planet earth out to kill and
drink the Blood of your children or neighbors?
FBI-ATF Raid on a Satanic Human Sacrifice
Does your Pulpit Goon tell you that the Jews in Israel are GODs chosen people?
Does the below Alein-Fallen Angel base look like the fictious created Star of David that fly on Israels flag?
Exclusive Illuminati Alien Photo Area 52, Nevada 20,000 years old
Does your Preacher or Pulpit goon tell you to support the Palestinians who are the bloodline from the original tribes of Israel?
A highly respected study done at John’s Hopkins by a group led by Israeli scientist Dr. Eran El Haik conclusively proved that Israeli Jews are genetically European.
Most Jews, 97.5%, have absolutely no Middle Eastern DNA of any kind, not Semitic certainly. Does this mean there can be no Jewish homeland? Actually no. Does it mean that “settlers” can move simply displace very real Semitic residents, for Palestinians are a totally “Semitic” race, and steal their homes?
The Geneva Conventions qualify this as a war crime. Even the European Union now outlaws anyone from having financial dealings with Israeli companies or persons living on illegally stolen land, not just the West Bank but 40% of pre-1967 Israel as well.
President John F. Kennedy warned Americans of these Satanic Secret Societies does your Preacher of Pulpit goon tell you what your murdered President told you?
President John F. Kennedy Warned US about The Illuminati Zionists Secret Societies
Why would any Christian in their right mind support a State called Israel the fake Jews Gen: 3:23
when their bitter hatred for mankind and especially Christians.
Filthy Disgusting Jews Every Christian needs to watch this one
When it comes to people’s beliefs I have come to the conclusion you cannot change the ignorance of the Human Race.
With that said the article below is an example of the Pulpit Goon follower’s mentality (Organized Religion to control the masses).
You do not need a pulpit goon to pray for you.
GOD JESUS wants to hear from you so get on your knees and see if that works.
Please do not despise or hate me for stating an honest opinion seek GOD and ask him if this opinion might be true.
This is why America is run by Illuminati-Zionist-Satanists.
Stew Webb Believer not a pulpit goon worshiper
Lawn again Christians: South African preacher makes congregation eat GRASS to ‘be closer to God’
Carried out under instruction of Pastor Lesego Daniel in Garankuwa
Claimed that humans can eat anything to feed their bodies
Photos that follow show dozens of people getting sick in the toilets
A South African preacher made his congregation eat grass to ‘be closer to God’ before stamping on them.
Under the instruction of Pastor Lesego Daniel of Rabboni Centre Ministries dozens of followers dropped to the floor to eat the grass at his ministry in Garankuwa, north of Pretoria after being told it will ‘bring them closer to God.’
His controversial methods have drawn criticism from thousands of people although members of his congregation swear by his methods – he is said to have claimed that humans can eat anything to feed their bodies and survive on whatever they choose to eat.
A South African preacher made his congregation eat grass to ‘be closer to God’ before stamping on them
Under the instruction of Pastor Lesego Daniel of Rabboni Centre Ministries dozens of followers dropped to the floor to eat the grass at his ministry in Garankuwa, north of Pretoria
One woman claimed eating the grass stopped her having a sore throat, while another said it healed her after a stroke
The congregation were told eating the grass will ‘bring them closer to God’
The pastor’s actions during the service prompted a series of online complaints
‘Yes, we eat grass and we’re proud of it because it demonstrates that, with God’s power, we can do anything,’ Rosemary Phetha told South Africa’s Times Live.
The 21-year-old law student says she had been battling a sore throat for more than a year, but it was healed after she ate the grass.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
The final nail is in the coffin. We now learn that the NSA “routinely shares raw intelligence data with Israel without first sifting it to remove information about US citizens…
“Details of the intelligence-sharing agreement are laid out in a memorandum of understanding between the NSA and its Israeli counterpart that shows the US government handed over intercepted communications likely to contain phone calls and emails of American citizens. The agreement places no legally binding limits on the use of the data by the Israelis.”1
Israel is allowed to keep “any files containing the identities of US persons” for up to one year.
This is just a tip of the iceberg. The Guardian continues to say that in 2009, “the New York Times reported on ‘the agency’s attempt to wiretap a member of Congress, without court approval, on an overseas trip.’”2
Israel’s aggressive and wicked activities against the U.S. have been going on for years, and the National Intelligence Estimate itself “ranked them as the third most aggressive intelligence against the U.S.”3 One official admitted, “One of NSA’s biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence services, like Israel.”4
The Israeli regime has denied any of this. But the logic is pretty simple: the NSA virtually controls U.S. citizens through technologies such as Google, iPhone, Yahoo, etc., and the NSA reports to the Israelis. Since the NSA is acting illegally here, it “violated rules on surveillance of telephone records for almost three years and misled a secret court…”5
More recently, Google’s manager of information Heather Adkins has made it clear that “Passwords are dead.” If you think you were relying on passwords to secure some of your precious documents online, Adkins has news for you: the “game is over…our relationship with passwords are done.”6 We also learned that the NSA had access to Google documents as well.7
In a nutshell, the West is really outnumbered. In the previous article, I ended with the question, “Where are the men of the West?” A commentator responded,
“Off in their isolated world, asleep, on drugs, booze, wallowing in their own ignorance, hung up on TV watching, mainly professional sports, clinging to the delusions that so far given them a comfortable life. Watch them in the grocery checkout line. Well dressed, incommunicative, booze buyers. No sense of humour, a few items ‘the little woman’ told them to buy, aka mentally, detached whimps.”
Putin is a beacon of political light
While many of our fellow Americans are politically sleeping, Vladimir Putin once again has been giving us something that is far more rational than what the Zionist regime has been propounded for years. Putin declared,
“We [the Russian government] are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law. We need to use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos.
“The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether we like it or not. Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defense or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of aggression.
“No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists.”8
Putin is right in line with rational thought here. Even neoconservative shills such as Robert Spencer declare that Putin “talked a lot of sense,” though Spencer scolds Putin on other issues. Spencer continues to document quite rightly,
“Two Europeans who were allegedly abducted and held hostage for several months in Syria claim they overheard a conversation between their captors suggesting the Syrian rebels were behind the deadly chemical attack in Damascus…”
We agree with Spencer here. What he needs to do next is to tell neoconservatives such as Kristol, Tobin, McCain, Graham, to stop pushing Obama to invade Syria. Spencer keeps propounding that Obama wants to invade Syria, but Spencer cannot not tell us that the driving force behind this movement is the neoconservative mafia.
The Washington Times itself declares, “U.S. Intelligence has yet to uncover evidence that Syrian President Bashar Assad directly ordered the chemical attacks last month on civilians in a suburb of Damascus, though the consensus inside U.S. agencies and Congress is that members of Mr. Assad’s inner circle likely gave the command.”9
Bruce Riedel, a former CIA and heads of the Intelligence Project at the Brookings Institution, admitted, “As far as I know, there’s no intelligence that links [Mr. Assad] directly to the operation, so that does raise the question of command and control.”10
It has convincingly been pointed out that the Sarin gas that was used in Syria was made in the United States.11 Gordon Duff has an excellent article on this as well. The LA Timesconnects the dots by reporting that “Prosecutors in southern Turkey have alleged that Syrian rebel groups were seeking to buy materials that could be used to produce highly toxic sarin gas…”
The plot thickens. The Zionist regime seems to deliver Sarin gas to the Syrian rebels; the rebels then used it, and then blamed Assad for it. Once Assad is blamed, then the same Zionist regime asks for a regime change.
We are currently seeing the same thing with the NSA. The NSA recently admitted that it wrongly placed “16,000 phone numbers on an ‘alert list’ so their incoming calls could be monitored, a mistake that a judge from the secret surveillance court called a ‘flagrant violation’ of the law.”12 This has happen “frequently and systematically.”13
Being placed on an “alert list” can mean that you are a potential terrorist, and being a potential terrorist means that you are being watched, and being watched means that the Zionist regime has their eyes on you.
If you think this is far-fetched, the New York Police Department has already “labeled entire mosques as terrorist organizations,” according to the Associated Press. It is a vicious cycle: the Zionist regime invents terrorism and kills people and destroys nations in the name of fighting terrorism! No serious politician in the West has actually challenged that bloody Zionist matrix except Putin.
People may not like Putin for various reasons, but the Zionist political power is too strong to alienate people of good will. Moreover, Putin has made enough substantive arguments against the Zionist regime, such as the following:
“It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan ‘you’re either with us or against us.’
“But force has proved ineffective and pointless. Afghanistan is reeling, and no one can say what will happen after international forces withdraw. Libya is divided into tribes and clans. In Iraq the civil war continues, with dozens killed each day. In the United States, many draw an analogy between Iraq and Syria, and ask why their government would want to repeat recent mistakes.
“No matter how targeted the strikes or how sophisticated the weapons, civilian casualties are inevitable, including the elderly and children, whom the strikes are meant to protect…We must stop using the language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement.”14
Putin, who has been called all sorts of bad names, concludes, “We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”15
I personally would prefer Putin as president of the United States over Obama because Putin seems to have some political backbone and seems to understand what the Zionist power is doing to the West. Look at Greece, for example. Business Insider has recently declared that “Greece’s unemployment nightmare has gotten worse.”16
Who in his right mind would want another war in the Middle East, except enemies of the West and mankind? What country would want to send soldiers in another country to fight and die for a proxy war and does not want to send its own soldiers to fight for the same war?17
And if you do not think that the Zionist regime, most particularly the neoconservatives, has a hand in which political hermeneutic is loused up, think again. Jonathan S. Tobin of Commentary calls the Putin administration a “regime.”18
Joseph Klein of FrontPage declares that Putin is playing games with the United States and “his international monitoring proposal makes Machiavellian sense.”19
Not only that, Russia, according to Tobin, offers “a faux-diplomatic solution” that is very “fraudulent.”20
Tobin continues elsewhere, “president [Obama] displayed weakness by not going ahead and ordering an attack on his own authority against the Assad regime following its use of chemical weapons to murder a thousand people last month.”21
Pro-Israel and Jewish groups indirectly ended up saying almost the same thing by asking for a military strike against Syria.22 The Washington Post declares:
“The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a leading Jewish human rights organization, explicitly invoked the Holocaust in a letter to lawmakers Tuesday, noting that U.S. and British officials did not respond when they were alerted in 1942 that the Nazis planned to use gas to kill Jews.”23
What, then, does that say about the Simon Wiesenthal Center? It is an organization that is based on colossal hoaxes and fabrications.24
Zionism and the West
The questions that must seriously be answered by virtually any serious person are these:
How is it that Western countries in general universally fall into this double standard by pressing more sanctions on Iran and no sanctions on Israel, when the latter is an enemy of America and much of the West?25 How is it that countries like Spain are planning to make “Holocaust studies obligatory,”26 leaving the impression that the Nazi “Holocaust” is unique?
How is it that the neo-Bolsheviks/Zionists keep living in contradiction by saying that the Holocaust is unique but in the same breath invoke the same Holocaust story to invade other nations? How can Hitler be “unique” when Saddam and Assad are also Hitlers in the Zionist reading of things? How is it that even Taylor Swift “sounds a lot like Hitler,” according to one writer of the Jewish Journal?
How is it that the Zionist regime keeps violating the privacy of U.S. citizens and the majority of Western countries by snooping on them but the same regime produces a lava-like flow of media outrage when Edward Snowden snoops on them?
How is it that Jewish groups never cease to make ridiculous excuses in order to destroy other countries like Syria?27 How is it that neo-Bolshevik cells such as the Weekly Standard and Commentary never cease to lambaste Obama as a failure for not bombing Syria?
How is it that the Zionist regime will go to war with a sovereign country such as Syria in spite of the fact that the vast majority of Americans and even those who have served in Iraq do not want a Syria invasion?28
How is it that the Zionist regime continues to support a large section of Al-Qaeda when an Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri declared that he aspired to attack America in order to “bleed America economically”?
How is it that neoconservative shills such as Thomas Sowell cannot see the illogical leaps of their own worldview? I personally do not know how a smart person like Sowell cannot detect the contradictory nature of his conclusions.
At one point, Sowell argues that Obama is weak because he does not invade Syria, but then the same Sowell declares that “The Obama administration added more to the national debt in his first term than President Bush had in both his terms put together.”
Of course! Why did William Kristol call Obama “a born-again neocon”? It is because Obama has aggressively pursued the same neoconservative policy in the Middle East, which has contributed to the national debt.
Sowell cannot see this because he has been a neoconservative protégé and certainly has received great accolades from the Jewish World Review. How can all these happen in America and much of the West without a universal outrage?
The answer is simple: Rabbinic Judaism—the religion that has become “the synagogue of Satan” at the foot of the Cross—has never died out over the centuries and its theological and political implications are still waging war against all mankind, including decent Jews, Muslims, Christians, and even atheists and skeptics.
Lord Sacks, former Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew congregations of the Commonwealth, has even called Richard Dawkins an anti-Semite for criticizing the Old Testament! Dawkins is partly rational but he is certainly not an anti-Semite. Things didn’t get better for Dawkins when he said that Jews in America are “monopolizing American foreign policy.” Dawkins continues:
“When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told – religious Jews anyway – than atheists and (yet they) more or less monopolize American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place.”
Abe Foxman calls this “classic anti-Semitism.” Why is everyone an anti-Semite for criticizing the Jewish stronghold?
It is because the theological substratum of Rabbinic Judaism dominates the Zionist regime in Israel and America, particularly among dispensational premillennialists, or Christian Zionism. (We will look at a brief history of this movement in the next article.)
Israel: the mother of harlots
In the book of Revelation, Israel is called Babylon, “The Mother of Harlots and Abomination of the earth” (Revelation 17:5). Previously, the Apostle John declared that “the kings of the earth have committed fornication” with this Babylon “and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication” (Revelation 17:2).
Babylon was a name in the Old Testament which signified an enemy of God’s people. After the resurrection of Christ, Jerusalem theologically came to be identified as Babylon in the book of Revelation. In the words of one scholar, Jerusalem has become ‘the implacable enemy of God” and joined other nations “in the attempted overthrow of the King.”29 The “King” here is of course Christ.
According to New Testament scholar G. K. Beale, Babylon clearly “refers to apostate Israel.”30 Gary DeMar likewise declares that “there is little doubt that the Babylon of Revelation is the first-century city of Jerusalem.”31
The hostility has changed shapes and forms over the ages, but it has always come back in the form of a deep-seated hatred toward the Logos and virtually anyone or any country associated with Logos. This hostility has jumped from one revolutionary movement to another, and every society that has left the Logos and embraced Jewish subversive activity has suffered deeply. Civilta Cattolica had it right in the 1890s by making these points very clear.
[Editors Note: Dear readers, This is Lasha’s main debut article for VT, something that she has put a lot of work into and we have done a special magazine layout for it. You will be getting a full dose of the usual review of 911 unfinished business over the next week, but we wanted to add something new into the discussion, and we certainly have.
The focus on the art was symbolic in that while we must certainly deal with a lot of ugliness in the world, we must never forget about all the beauty that has been created, and motivation behind it. While fighting the bad, we must protect the good…Jim W. Dean]
A puzzling new poem, reportedly written by Osama Bin Laden in the wake of 9-11, is here presented to the reader in the run-up to the 12th anniversary of 9-11.
The reader is asked to decide whether the poem, prophesying Armageddon and the coming destruction of America, is an authentic bin Laden poem or an imitation. On May 16, 2007, on my twenty-ninth birthday, a beautifully written manuscript in calligraphic script fell into my hands in India. This was simply a series of sentences separated by diagonal strokes (/) which purported to be a literal, word-for-word paraphrase in English of an extended poem written in Arabic by Osama bin Laden in the immediate aftermath of 9-11.
Bits had been added to the manuscript (in the broad margins) over the intervening years. These served as commentaries and clarifications. The poem was divided into several parts, each headed by a symbol which I took to be a letter of the Arabic alphabet.
The scary title of the manuscript: Bin Laden’s Curse — ‘Death to America!’
I was given to understand that various versions of this poem, both in Arabic and Urdu, had begun to circulate in late 2001 in the tea houses of Rawalpindi, Karachi, and Lahore. One such version of the poem had been obtained by my Sanskrit tutor, Bengali poet Ananda Kumar Bannerji, while vacationing with his family in Srinagar, Kashmir.
He handed me the manuscript in Pondicherry, South India, at the Sri Aurobindo ashram at which both of us happened to be staying at the time. He asked me what I thought of the poem.
I was in no position to judge the “authenticity” of the mishmash of ravings that confronted me; nor did I attempt to do so at that stage.
Being a poet-translator myself, I decided on an impulse—and purely as a literary exercise—to translate into rhymed English verse the somewhat disconnected scraps that had come my way. It seemed to me that this fascinating material, which was essentially a rant of rage against Western civilization in general and America in particular, would provide a useful clue to Americans who keep asking, Why do they hate us?
The intelligent reader may be wondering at this point if his leg is being pulled. Did Osama bin Laden actually write this hysterical diatribe? Is there the slightest evidence that this poem ever existed in the original Arabic?
There are certainly no traces of such a maledictory poem in existence right now, either in Arabic or Urdu or in any other language, as far as I know. Bin Laden was of course a skilled poet, and many of his poems have been translated into English, but did he write this one?
My own view is that it is not altogether certain that bin Laden is the author of this particular poem, although the possibility cannot be discounted.
He may have written it originally in the wake of 9-11 and added bits to it over the years, e.g., the references to the Iraq war and the Abu Ghraib scandal which surfaced in early 2004.
To a large extent, it would depend on whether bin Laden was the evil genius behind 9-11. If he was, this would obviously increase the chances that he had written the poem—for in the poem he gloats over America’s humiliation on September 11, 2001, and predicts more 9-11s to come.
Nowhere in the poem, however, does bin Laden accept personal responsibility for 9-11. He is pleased that the act was done, but so were thousands of other people throughout the world who celebrated the event with champagne parties and dancing in the streets—as Tariq Ali revealed in the introduction to his excellent book The Clash of Fundamentalisms.
What finally persuaded me to offer this poem up for publication, given that it has been gathering dust on my shelves for so many years? I guess the time is right. It would be a shame to let the poem lie around unread. The material has curiosity value.
It provides, moreover, an insight into the terrorist mind. It is certainly a shocking poem, though its shock potential would have been far greater if there had been proof that Osama bin Laden had actually written it. There is no such proof.
Indeed, there is no proof that Osama bin Laden orchestrated 9/11 at all.
The only “proof” that Al Qaeda was behind 9-11 is that the American government and the notoriously unreliable and mendacious mainstream mass media say so.
Beyond this authoritative assertion of fact—an assertion that becomes increasingly unconvincing by the day—there is no proof whatever for the claim that bin Laden orchestrated 9-11. There is certainly no scientific evidence for such a claim.
Indeed, newly released evidence proves conclusively—contrary to government claims—that the World Trade Center twin towers and Building 7 must have been brought down by the prior placement of nanothermite and other powerful explosives within the buildings. (See here)
Here are some relevant facts the reader would do well to consider before reading the poem.
Though many taped messages had purportedly been issued by Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri, not one of them after September 9, 2002 has been authenticated as genuine by independent experts such as the Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence, based in Martigny, Switzerland. (Institut Dalle Molle d’Intelligence Artificielle Perceptive, now the IDIAP Research Institute).
For further details of doctored bin Laden tapes, see  —  —  — 
The only “experts” to validate the later bin Laden tapes have been those same intelligence agencies whose reputation for deceiving the public is now legendary.
Thus genuine video tapes delivered to Al-Jazeera TV in late 2001, featuring an emaciated and white-bearded bin Laden disclaiming responsibility for 9-11, offer a bizarre contrast to the obviously fake bin Laden video tape of November 9, 2001—a tape conveniently “discovered” by American soldiers in an abandoned house in Jalalabad.
Here a suspiciously plump and black-bearded Osama is suddenly found fessing up to 9-11.
Bin Laden was not a man given to lying. On September 17, 2001 he issued a message to al-Jazeera, disclaiming all responsibility for 9-11: “I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation.”
Just ten days later, on 28 September, he repeated his denial of involvenment. “I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks.”
The real perpetrators of 9-11, many people seem to think, were Israeli intelligence and their neoconservative accomplices in America. Possibly bin Laden thought this too—which would make him a “conspiracy theorist” as well as a “terrorist”.
Such an explosive conspiracy theory (Mossad + American neocons = 9-11 masterminds) could hardly be allowed to take root in the American psyche. It was therefore deemed necessary to pin down the blame for 9-11 on bin Laden and a bunch of jihadis armed with box cutters.
Hence their was a need for a whole slew of bogus tapes in which an actor playing the part of bin Laden accepts full responsibility for 9-11, thereby giving America and Britain a pretext for pulverizing the Muslim world and plundering its resources—all this at the instigation of Israel and their neoconservative allies in the Bush administration.
Bin Laden was almost certainly dead long before his sensational “assassination” on May 2, 2011, in his hideout in Abbotabad, Pakistan, at the hands of the CIA and US naval Special Warfare operatives.
It became perfectly safe after this date to issue bogus bin Laden tapes ad nauseam, threatening the West with fire and brimstone, given that the real Osama was no longer around to deny the authenticity of the same tapes.
All these fake tapes and phoney bin Laden lookalikes have been a sign of acute desperation. The perpetrators of Abu Ghraib have not only lost the moral ground—they have lost the war on terror.
One person who is convinced he knows who did 9-11 is Dr Alan Sabrosky. Former director of the Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, he does not mince his words in a relatively recent interview.
He places the blame for 9-11 fairly and squarely on Israel.
Here now is the four part poem purportedly penned by Osama bin Laden in the wake of 9-11. I have translated the English paraphrase I received into 8-line rhymed stanzas based on a strict A-B-C-D-B-A-C-D rhyming scheme.
This was because the original Arabic, according to my Indian friend Mr Bannerji, was couched in the complicated rhyming prose found in the Qur’an.
The reader is asked to make allowances for the apocalyptic language. This is all part of the original. Toning it down so as to make it more palatable to Western tastes would be self-defeating.
Decide for yourself if this is a genuine Osama bin Laden poem, penned by the Master Terrorist himself, or if it is an imitation.
One final point: I would like to assure the reader that, in submitting this poem for publication, I am not myself the perpetrator of a puerile literary hoax. I did not write this poem myself, nor am I receiving either fame or fortune from its publication.
I have merely translated, in good faith, a prose paraphrase of someone else’s rendition of an extended poem in Arabic reportedly written by Osama bin Laden in late 2001 and added to subsequently by bin Laden himself or other scribe(s).
If there are any Western resonances in the poem (e.g., “shooting fish in a barrel”), this is because my version is presented through the prism of my own personality and bears the stamp of my style and character.
This is not only a translation, remember, it is a translation of a translation. Many of the ideas sketched in the poem, particularly in Part 3 which is about Israel, are clearly out of date and erroneous. The idea that Israel is an American colony is one such wrong idea.
Here now is the poem: an extended malediction of America and a prophecy of its impending doom.
Bin Laden’s Curse — ‘ Death to America! ‘
“Do what you can, and so shall we. Just wait!—we too are waiting.”— Qur’an XI. 121-22
1. THE GREAT SATAN
America!The inhabitants of the earthAre drunkWith the wine of your fornications!You have given birthTo terror, hatred, hysteria!Your people are sunkIn stupefaction.
Is the Syrian gambit an Astounding convergence of pre-staged baffooneries?
In an astounding but brilliantly managed convergence of numerous pre-staged buffooneries, it certainly appears that the Third Force has now manipulated American Politicians, Intel, the Judiciary and Officials into a situation where they are becoming completely exposed for all the criminal and unconstitutional acts they have committed, thanks to the worldwide Internet’s dispensation of “truth nuggets” which make such readily apparent to many Americans for the first time.
Has the Third Force began its move to take down Mystery Babylon, the City of London Central Banksters, the folks who run the US Petro Dollar and hold most of the free world hostage with it?
It’s almost as if Potus is committing political suicide right before our very eyes while triggering the exposure of the rest of the USG’s serial lying, illegal warrant-less massive spying, staging of false-flag attacks and other false pretenses used to take America into illegal, undeclared, unconstitutional wars for defense contractor profits and increased police powers under the influence of foreign based powers which include the zionist city of London Central Banksters and Israeli-firster dual Citizens and NeoCon traitors.
Is there an “Alien Agenda” that has been set up by the Third Force as a master trap for the USG?
Is this all part of a big hidden trick of the “Alien Agenda” the USG entered into in secret after Roswell? Has the USG been enticed into a major trap by entering into a partnership with alien ETs to obtain advanced technology and has the USG been set up to become fully exposed and “sacrificed” as a part of a larger Alien Agenda run by the Third Force?
For those who do not accept the idea of an alien agenda being imposed on the USG and some other world governments, you are wasting your time reading this article. However if you have a desire to learn more about this perspective of the Third Force and its Alien Agenda is, you can refer to these two articles listed below.(1)
Some credible insiders have claimed that most top world leaders have had to enter into a contract with the Third Force which is really lucifer, the fallen one, the great deceiver of mankind, who has presented himself as the Annunaki Master Controller Chief Alien ET which is claimed to be an an inter-generational, inter-dimensional entity that is manipulating the world according to his alien ET agenda. This alien agenda seems to be parasitical within ins hosts who then act as parasites upon the world after they become its super-elite rulers. (2)
Never before since America became a Republic has so much USG corruption and lies been exposed in such a short time, along with the force behind such corruption which has been buying off and bribing American politicians, the zionist Israeli-firster dual citizen traitors and their illegal spy organizations like Aipac, ADL, SPLC ect.
Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., former Assistant secretary of the Treasury has written an important article, The West Dethroned, which clarifies the zionist hijacking of American and Israeli-firsters attempt to manipulate President Obama into being a war criminal. (3)
The USG, DHS, the Justice Department and almost all parts of the USG have now completely discredited themselves, and this has all been clearly exposed on the alternative media of the Internet.
The problem today is that most Americans just do not believe anything the USG says or testifies to in Congress, including anything from the Attorney General Eric Holder, DHS head Janet Napolitano, the heads of NSA, DHS, the FBI, the CIA or any other USG Agency or either Senators McCain or Graham or any other of their NeoCon zios or Israeli-firster crowd. The USG and American intel has completely and perhaps irretrievably discredited itself and smear itself never to be trusted by the American people ever again on ANYTHING at all.
And then we have the Secretary of State, John Kerry, a Russell Trust Skull & Bonemans from the Yale Tomb, a fully committed luciferian, word-smithing and lying through his teeth claiming that they have evidence Assad gassed his own people. He refused to answer a question if the Syrians rebel (aka al Cia Duh) had any involvement. For those who want to know about Skull & Bones and its parent the Russell trust, the world’s biggest opium profiteer read some basic research by Professor Anthony Sutton who was given access to their official documents by a relative of a deceased Skull & Bonesman.
Suddenly, USG corruption is being exposed on all fronts for the American public to envision.
It’s as if all the USG corruption is suddenly being exposed for all to see, showing the King to be naked to the American people, who are starting to see through the blatant USG lies being daily dispensed on the USG’s behalf by the Controlled Major Mass media (CMMM).
The current administration’s push for an attack on Assad and Syria is triggering deep insights among mainstream America and “we the people”, insights never before possible.
This USG push for an illegal attack on Syria has triggered new and deep insight by many millions of Americans into the same lies and deceptions used to argue America into all three major Mideast wars, two in Iraq and one in Afghanistan.
Folks are connecting the dots and saying, hey our Intel chief lied about warrant-less spying, they lied about Saddam’s so-called weapons of mass destruction, Osama bin laden was CIA and never attacked the twin towers and these wars after 911 in Irag and Afghanistan were all based on lies. Gee, that is what is going on now with the USG claims about Syria.
According to a news report today, the German press has reported that Assad DID NOT order the gas attack. (4)
And Assad himself has vehemently denied that he ordered any such gas attack.
And now many have read in the Alternative media on the Internet from numerous sources they respect that there is no evidence Assad used any poisonous gas against his own people and as usual the USG and the Controlled major mas Media (CMMM) are lying in unity to support these government liars.
We also have credible reports that the Syrian rebels did the gas attacks with materials somehow obtained from DOD contractors in top secret bio-weapons labs spread around from the Caspian Basin to the Baltic. (5)
And Congress members who have seen classified intel reports claim they do not prove Assad gassed anybody. (6)
Immense pressure is now being applied to senators and Congress-persons to vote for an attack on Assad and it looks like it may not succeed. If it does it could set off a nuclear exchange leading to WW3.
It has become exceedingly clear to many Americans that Israel and its dual citizen Israeli-firsters in America and its various wealthy central Bankster influence/espionage groups are now applying immense pressure of all varieties to Congress to coerce a vote to go ahead and bomb Assad on Israel’s behalf, something President Obama has asked for but approximately 90% of the American public is against.
The exact reasons why President Obama has decided to ask for a vote, seeking Congressional approval when Clinton and Bush2 neglected to do so remains a mystery, but there have been some rumors deep inside the beltway that his football has been removed and he has been placed under “restriction” by the high military command who has now taken charge and made certain they have their Chuck Hagel and General Martin Dempsey in control, two individuals who the mainstream military explicitly trusts. So far it looks like they are American-firsters and we can only hope that is so.
Whatever happens, attack on Syria or no attack, it is a safe bet to assume that the cat is out of the bag and for the first time ever massive USG corruption and influence peddling is being exposed on all fronts and whistle-blowers are leaking from every direction, with more each day.
Not since the decline of the Soviet Union has a super power such as the United States declined so rapidly in world influence as what has occurred under Bush1, Clinton, Bush2 and now Obama al the while the USG has unleashed more military might than any other nation in history or all prior warfare in history. And yet America has grown increasingly weak with a huge deficit based on borrowing funny money from a crooked fraudulent Central bank franchised out of the City of London.
The military industrial complex (aka the Secret Shadow Government or SSG) has asset stripped America bare and it nears complete economic collapse after becoming involved in a 750 Trillion dollar derivatives Ponzi scheme that could collapse any minute.
This massive display on extended American might in such perpetual war endeavors actually going back to Vietnam have asset stripped America’s middle class of its wealth to keep the fat cats of Wall Street banks, the defense industry and big oil fed huge profits. America has been hijacked by the central Banksters who have asset stripped America through illegal taxation and huge phony loans/deficits to fund these massive wars of aggression, mass-death and major war crimes that would have embarrassed the judges at the Nuremberg Trials.
And the American people, thanks to the alternative news on the Internet and so many 911 truthers that have gone public, are starting to wake up and understand the massive lying and corruption that the USG is comprised of. It is now becoming exceedingly clear that no matter how hard it tries, the Controlled major Mass Media (CMMM) cannot put humpty-dumpty back together again.
Many Americans are now finding out for the first time that those who run the USG, Congress, the Justice Dept, the Supreme Court and Judiciary, and American Intel are typically traitors, liars, perjurers, and Constitutional Oath violators, with some blatantly human compromised by honey traps and other blackmail schemes. It’s only a matter of time and the American people will rise up and drive ‘em out of government one way or another. Yes, the jig is about up.
Actually, the current USG, comprised of the executive, Congress and the Judiciary have morphed into a big RICO criminal syndicate using national security to invoke a complete secrecy lock-down and prevent exposure of their crimes against America and “we the people”.
And the specifics of this big RICO crime syndicate are now being exposed to all Americans via the Alternative media of the worldwide Internet, more every single day. But actually even though this secrecy lock-down has been massive, comprehensive and highly compartmented, it is failing at every level. Even the criminal harassment and illegal prosecution of federal whistle-blowers is not slowing or stopping massive secrecy leaks, and soon there will be a complete end to all secrecy except launch codes. And with quantum computing on the near horizon it’s only a matter of time and those too will be completely cracked along with all crypto-graphics.
The American people are now becoming informed of all this massive USG corruption which is getting exposed more and more each day and most have about had it with the current load of Congress and Potus and Vice-Potus as well as the whole administration including the Attorney general and the heads of the NSA, DHS and CIA, all who have been caught lying and are deeply implicated in illegal unconstitutional acts against the American public.
It seems like everyone is turning against Potus, the American people, many of his democratic black constituents, the military, intel, and the NeoCon Israeli-firster zio dual citizens. How he has painted himself into such a corner is a complex phenomenon but certainly the fact that his background has been wiped clean and nobody really knows who he is or where he came from does not help either. Did the secret Shadow Government (SSG) provide the minorities with their token black, and now are they planning to serve up a token woman for Potus in the next election, a Hillary Clinton or a Sarah Palin?
Yes, the USG has become a big RICO crime syndicate. Doubt it, carefully read and study the Civil and Criminal RICO laws.
Together this complex of institution and organizations inside the beltway that constitutes the USG actually clearly fits the definition of a large Rico crime syndicate, and it is now becoming exceedingly clear that it has hijacked America and all its wealth from “we the people” and formed their own little “Federal Family” and “National Security State in DC” and now the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which was set up by neocon zionist neo-Bolshevik Dual-citizen Israeli-firsters to keep the “dum Goya in line”, and also to eventually declare war against the American people with Red Terror and to run a New American Cheka mass-murder machine inside America to murder up to 80% of Americans.
Of course what these federal Family stooges who are not being told is that they will never get their pensions because the whole economic system has been engineered to collapse and they will be the disposable enforcers who will be consumed in the American civil war that will result.
In 1913 America was hijacked by the City of London zionist Central Banksters.
In 1913 America was hijacked by the City of London zionist Central Banksters and they have controlled American politics ever since because they can issue or print all the money they need to buy, bride, entice almost any politician, judge, USG official, corporate chief they want.
In the process they have asset stripped America bare, destroyed its economy and money system, banking, credit and turned most citizens into debt-slaves serfs, all the while demanding more and more illegal taxation, social control and extraction of basic God given human rights guaranteed by the US Constitution.
Roswell and the crashed UFOs gave the US Military the excuse to form the Secret Shadow Government and the power to form a National Security State to provide for their needs only at the expense of most other Americans. And they have used the UFO phenomena which started in full force ion 1947 at Roswell as their phony reason to impose “national security” as a false cloak to cover all their increasing crimes against the American people.
So what are the RICO crimes the USG been recently exposed for in this strange convergence of exposure like never before in history?
1. Folks now realize they have a president they don’t even know who he is, where he came from, or exactly what he is. Such “strangers” like bill Clinton have become elected before but never been so fully exposed publicly for what they are or are not.
2. The USG was caught red handed in Operation fast and Furious providing high powered weapons to the Mexican drug cartels in a sophisticated attempt to institute a false-flag attack on the second Amendment. This failed and Holder and the other criminals that ordered this were fully exposed, but avoided criminal prosecution since they are those who would have to prosecute and the executive was too corrupt to appoint a special prosecutor for this clear cut Rico crime and Sedition.
3. USG got caught murdering Ambassador Chris Steven in an attempt to cover up a bungled illegal arms transfer of captured Libyan arms to CIA mercenaries in Syria, another botched covert operation and clear cut violation of International law and illegal pre-emptive war, you know what the Nuremberg trials identified as a war crime. Of course there are estimated to be approximately 2,000 missing shoulder fired missiles which some say CIA mercenaries have but these “al Cia duh” are an unreliable bunch and may be selling these missiles to other groups for their own private retirement money. Yes, these missiles have biodegradable circuits which limit their useful life to several years or less, and some can be jammed by a several electronic warfare systems if close enough, but the fact they are out there poses a threat to any commercial, military or passenger aircraft in the world. A convenient mistake that was perhaps intended to create new terror crises to further justify another large buildup in the war on terror?
4. American intel gets caught spying engaging in massive warrant-less spying on all normal Americans by tapping and recording all electronic communications, Internet, phone, fax everything. And the persons responsible who run these agencies are caught lying to Congress and so far have gotten away with it when they should have been immediately arrested for illegal wiretapping, abuse of process and criminal RICO. No one no matter how high up should be exempt from the law, but the whole USG has placed itself above the law since The JCS and the CIA Op40 assassinated JFK in 1963, ushering in what Jack Ruby called, “a whole new form of government”(Ruby was referring to the emergence of the Secret Shadow Government aka military defense complex, actual best described as super-fascism, the convergence of the state and the large offshore international corporation with the corporations calling the shots—this is what President Eisenhower warned about as he left office).
5. And now the big enchilada. In a very strange act of absurdity the US President and a significant selection of Congresspersons and the Senators want to deliver an air attack on Syria. Their reason is based on one of the flimsiest most easily exposed lies in history, that Assad allegedly gassed his civilians in a civil war. First of all it isn’t a civil war, it is an invasion by A Cia Duh mercenaries fully funded and trained by America on Israel’s behalf to protect the Petro Dollar and the new Qatar planned natural gas line that must go through Syria, an offer Assad refused. In order for this pipeline to be built Syria must fall, which will then allow the take-down of Iran, the final target of Israeli-firsters and USG NeoCons. And second, “Al Cia Duh”, aka the so-called “Syrian rebels” actually did one gas attack which killed about 500 civilians and the second one was faked using old photos. The USG is being pushed to attack Assad strictly because Israeli-firsters and NeoCons and zio Infiltrators are applying extreme pressure and calling out all favors due and these efforts include plain envelopes under doors and lots of manipulative phone calls and visits. This is all part of the zionist plan for a one world zionist regime, their luciferian NWO. However, the Third Force (TF) apparently has a different idea. Since the TF is a master of deception, it appears that the TF is now pulling the greatest trick in history, and is fully exposing all his Cutouts for what all the crimes they have committed against America and “we the people”. And it now appears that TF is planning on eventually hijacking this newly emergent world populism to form his own NWO completely different than what his Cutouts in the City of London, the financial engine of the Great Mystery Babylon had planned and believed in.
And of course a central part of TF’s long term plan was to build up the zionists and then also build up a parallel and a massive counter-force of Muslims and pit them against each other in a war to destroy both and usher in his own TF one world government. Of course before this final final sequence the zionist money-changer system and their Babylonian luciferian money-magick was to be used to hijack America and then the world in order to create millions of starving debt-slaves around the world.
The biggest question of all. Is the USG being nuclear blackmailed into attacking Assad on Israel’s and the zio central Bankster’s behalf?
Have the zios been aligned with a luciferian ET led force that was also involved in the 911 false-flag attacks and coerced certain top command elements of the USAF to cooperate to avoid much greater destruction?
Is that why Senator Lindsay graham has claimed that not to attack Assad could result in South Carolina being nuked being nuked by terrorists. And he stated this the same day it was reported that several nukes were removed from a Dyess, Texas AFB by the “nuclear snake-eaters” with no paperwork or proper usual authorization and transported to Charleston, SC. It has also been reported that two squadrons of B1B’s have left their usual bases in America. Why? And do all these events fit together?
And remember, some nukes taken from Minot North Dakota AF Base without proper authorization are still missing and there were six Heroes murdered in strange “Arkensides” that refused to let it go without talking. Could an international NOW zionist entity be nuclear blackmailing the USG and threatening to use DC as ground zero?
In any event it sort of seems that the Third Force (TF) is now done with these USG Cutouts.
It certainly looks like the Third Force is done with these cutouts and is going to cut them loose by fully exposing their corruption and what they have done to America, despite the constant lies of the CMMM which is desperately trying to “whistle on the way to the gallows”.
It sure looks like they will be “thrown under the bus” as the saying goes (also Bibi’s very worst fear for Israel and one he unwittingly is bringing about through his pugnacious apartheid actions). Yes, despite all the massive gyrations of lying and denial by the CMMM, mainstream America and “we the people” are just not buying it anymore.
So apparently the Third Force has a covert unspoken message for these USG cutouts: “thank you very much suckers, but you have been naughty and now you are now going to be fully exposed, and I am going to take over and finish the job my way. Your services are no longer needed”. So these cutouts that hijacked America and trashed its institutions of govt and rule of law are now going to be cut loose and thrown on the trash heap of history.
Too bad for them, but actually they deserve it, all of what they will get for being traitors, criminals and abusers of power. You know that old phrase, “they have the devil to pay”, well in their case it fits. But they also have the American people to pay, and once American populism is fully expressed the Banksters will be prosecuted and their illegal profits clawed back until every cent is repaid.
So now the deep RICO corruption in the USG is becoming fully exposed to many Americans and the curtain has been pulled back from the Wizard of Oz showing him to be a weak old man naked and ugly.
So what are the USG’s options now that the “cat is out of the bag” and the jig is up”?
So what are the USG’s options now that they have been caught and fully exposed in their deep lies, corruption and international war crimes and crimes against humanity and the American people for starting and running illegal wars and mass-murdering and wounding many thousands of American soldiers and millions of civilians as what they have described as mere “collateral damage” (as Madelyn Albright claimed over a half a million dead children from US sanctions against Iraq, “difficult but worth it”. Obviously the staging of one or more Gladio style “inside job” false flag-attacks are a main option I’m sure these criminal “enemies within” are now carefully considering.
The other action that remains is to stage a serious EMP using the cover story that it was a large solar flare. In this way much of the power grid could be knocked out and martial law could be declared.Or a complete economic collapse may be staged which will be used to declare martial law. Or the USG can geo-engineered major weather crisis like they did with Katrina to create an immediate pretense for martial law. Or the USG can conspire to start a nuclear WW3 while they hide in DUMBs and wipe out 80% of the world population in a drastic plan to create a new worldwide feudal system.
The Third Force appears to have its own plan.
Of course the Third Force may have its own specific plan, like forcing a 100% disclosure of alien ETs and anti-gravity craft which would be a major game-changer and perhaps hijacking a newly emergent worldwide Internet based populism to form the basis of a new luciferian world government based on a smooth deception that would appear to provide perfect worldwide governance.
For the first time, Americans are waking up in mass to USG corruption and violation of the US Constitution.
It has now recently become all too obvious to many Americans for the first time that Congresspersons are bought off and owned by numerous foreign interests with deep pockets and we have the worst government the most money can buy.
What was the original City of London Banksters plan to retake America after losing it during the Revolutionary War?
The plan all along was to hijack America using the City of London Banksters to foment revenge on America for winning the evolutionary War and to do this by installing a corrupt, unconstitutional, criminal money monopoly, the Federal Reserve.
This was the tip of the spear in an attack upon the Sovereignty of America and the first stage in the planned destruction of America, while using a very strange parallel track to build up America as a world superpower and a surrogate economic engine for the City of London Banksters, a means to enslave the whole world in a debt trap of US Petro Dollars. And the US Petro Dollar was never anything more than the covert surrogate monopoly money of the City of London central Banksters.
It is now becoming apparent that the NWO plan was a Third Force ruse from the beginning and merely a vehicle to take command later.
Premillennialist George Eldon Ladd says, “The basic watershed between a dispensational and a nondispensational theology” is that dispensationalism “forms its eschatology by a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and then fits the New Testament into it. A nondispensational eschatology forms its theology from the explicit teaching of the New Testament.”
For a dispensationalist or a Judaizer, many of the teachings in the Old Testament must take precedence over the teachings in New Testament—and sometimes even the teachings of Christ.
Moreover, Judaizers tend to invoke passages in the Old Testament in order to further their political and ideological ends. This has been one of the central issues among evangelical politicians.
In 2010, former presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, who has long been a supporter of Israel, made the pronouncement on the eve of her political stardom that America would cease to exist if it stops supporting Israel. She said:
“I am convinced in my heart and in my mind that if the United States fails to stand with Israel, that is the end of the United States. We have to show that we are inextricably entwined, that as a nation we have been blessed because of our relationship with Israel, and if we reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play.
“And my husband and I are both Christians, and we believe very strongly the verse from Genesis [Genesis 12:3], we believe very strongly that nations also receive blessings as they bless Israel. It is a strong and beautiful principle.”
We will not go into extensive theological exegesis here. We shall do so later in subsequent articles. But for Bachmann and others, this issue discussed in Genesis still applies to modern Israel, even though many Protestant writers have shown that God fulfilled those promises during the time of Joshua. Scripture also makes it plain that all the nations have been blessed because of Jesus Christ, who is the seed of Abraham.
“For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
“Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, and in thy seed shall all the kindred of the earth be blessed. Unto you first, God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities” (Acts 3:22-26).
This is completely antithetical to the Christian Zionist movement, which to a large extent elevates geopolitical Israel above anything else, including the church. One of the leading dispensationalists to espouse such a view is Herman Hoyt, who declared that in the dispensationalist millennium, the living Israel “will be the head over all the nations of the earth” and “on the lowest level there are the saved, living, Gentile nations.”
This view has been stated in many ways by other leading dispensationalist writers, including Charles C. Ryrie, J. Dwight Pentecost, H. Wayne House, Thomas D. Ice, John F. Walvoord, Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, Hal Lindsey, and even the late Dave Hunt.
Hunt goes so far as to say that “national Israel [will be] restored to its place of supremacy over the nations.” For dispensationalists, geopolitical Israel is one of the keys to the millennium. Pentecost states, “The Gentiles will be Israel’s servants” during that era. For Fruchtenbaum, “In the millennium Israel as a nation will rule over the Gentiles.”
The only way dispensational premillennialists are able to solve this theological numbo-jumbo is to propose that God has two distinct plans: one for the church and one for the nation of Israel. Charles C. Ryrie put it this way:
“A dispensationalist keeps Israel and the church distinct.”
Quoting another authority, Ryrie declares that “the basic premise of Dispensationalism is two purposes God expressed in the formation of two peoples who maintain their distinction throughout eternity.”
This view was articulated by other leading dispensationalists such as Lewis Sperry Chafer, and this thesis has played a major role in the writings of people like John Nelson Darby and C. I. Scofield.
By the time we reach the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, Dispensational Premillennialism had already been politicized, with presidents such as Ronald Reagan and beyond politically endorsing the movement. Charles Colson, a former Nixon advisor, had a cohort of friends in the White House who would lecture U.S. officials about prophecies in the book of Ezekiel and who would telephone “premillennialist faculty members at ‘Mid-South Seminary.”
Ronald Reagan was also a product of Hal Lindsey’s The Late Great Planet Earth and other apocalyptic frenzies. Reagan told Christian Life magazine back in 1968, “Apparently never in history have so many of the prophecies come true in such a relatively short time.”
Historian Paul Boyer declared that “The Late Great Planet Earth strengthened Reagan’s prophecy belief, and at a 1971 political dinner in Sacramento shortly after leftist coup in Libya, Reagan observer soberly:
‘That’s the sign that the day of Armageddon isn’t far off…Everything is falling into place. It can’t be too long. Ezekiel says that fire and brimstone will be rained upon the enemies of God’s people. That must mean that they’ll be destroyed by nuclear weapons.’”
Reagan also said, “You know, I turn back to your ancient prophets in the Old Testament and the signs foretelling Armageddon, and I find myself wondering if we’re the generation that’s going to see that come about. I don’t know if you’ve noted any of those prophecies lately, but believe me, they certainly describe the times we’re going through.”
Former president George W. Bush tried to convince France’s then president Jacques Chirac that “biblical prophecies were being fulfilled” and specifically that “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East,” but Chirac decided that “France was not going to fight a war based on an American president’s interpretation of the Bible.”
Like the dispensationalist camps, when the Gog and Magog apocalypse failed Bush, he turned to Baghdad as the forces of evil. As we shall see, all of this is completely compatible with the Judaizing movement which got its inception in the fifteenth century.
John Milton Was a Judaizer
A somewhat classic example of invoking the Old Testament to further ideological purposes is found in the life of John Milton, famed seventeenth-century English poet known for writing Paradise Lost.
Milton wanted to divorce his wife, but there was clear teaching about divorce in the New Testament. Christ taught that one ought not to divorce unless one partner has committed fornication (Matthew 5:32). Milton solved that problem by appealing to Moses and rejecting Christ’s teachings! To Milton,
“Our savior’s words touching divorce are, as it were, congealed into a stony rigour, inconsistent both with his doctrine and his office.”
As we shall see in subsequent articles, this form of eisegesis is consistent with many Protestant writers long before Milton came on the scene. Martin Luther for example wanted to burn the book of James because James did line up with Luther’s sola fide. And John Calvin was exegetically shown to be a Judaizer on many aspects.
Milton later said,
“Yea, God himself commands in his law more than once, and by his prophet Malachi, as Calvin and the best translations read that ‘he who hates, let him divorce—that is, he who hates cannot love. Hence it is that the rabbins, and Maimonides…tells us that ‘divorce was permitted by Moses to preserve peace in marriage and quiet in the family.’”
Milton’s reliance on rabbis such as Maimonides had nothing to do with the teachings of Christ, but rather with his own desire for divorce. He later published his own tract entitled The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, in which he essentially pleaded with England to allow divorce in society based on the teachings of the Old Testament and “some of the best among reformed writers.”
Yet Milton completely missed Moses’ point for sanctioning divorce in the Old Testament. As E. Michael Jones puts it,
“Milton again needs to contradict Christ and scripture, because Christ said ‘in the beginning it was not so,’ meaning that divorce was something added after the fall because Moses had to deal with the hardness of his people’s hearts.”
The temptation to reject the plain teachings of Christ—and the message of things like love, truth, dignity, love for one’s neighbor, and protection the innocent—and to embrace some of the Old Testament laws that were fulfilled or nullified by the coming of Jesus Christ did not start or die out in the seventeenth century. In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries many heretical movements drew their conclusions from the Old Testament.
Our time is no exception. For example, Sarah Palin frequently invoked passages in the Old Testament to pursue her political ends. Michelle Bachmann did the same thing in 2011. When Bachmann was obviously outmatched and losing support in Iowa, she didn’t invoke Christ or figures in the New Testament, but turned to Old Testament figures.
The simple fact is that many politicians—most specifically Christian Judaizers—have over the centuries appealed to the Old Testament in order to marshal their ideological purposes.
Take for example the Hussite revolution (which began in 1419), which used Moses and the nullified laws of the Old Testament, with respect to killing and pillaging enemies, as justification. There were indeed theological disputations around that time, and theological disputations got into politics, and politics got into a bloody war.
The selling of indulgences was one of the doctrines that caught the spirit of that era. Luther rose up and challenged that idea. But Luther did not stop there. Luther clung to the sword as portrayed in the Old Testament. Luther used language like the Old Testament, language which can be found throughout his denunciation of the pope.
“Hearest thou this, O pope,” he wrote in 1520, “not most holy, but most sinful? O that God from heaven would soon destroy thy throne and sink it in the abyss of hell!…O Christ, my Lord, look down, let the day of thy judgment break, and destroy the devil’s nest at Rome.” Luther sounded like James and John in the New Testament:
“And it came to pass, when the time was come that he [Jesus] should be received up, he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem. And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him. And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.
“And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them (Luke 9:52-54).
The Hussites solved problems such as indulgences by not only appealing to Moses in bearing swords and marching to crush their enemies, but also by leading mobs into churches and smearing excrement on crucifixes.
Historian Howard Kaminsky declares that Huss did not decide to start the violent revolution and the radical Hussites did not draw their radical movement which led to violent acts against monks in particular from Huss himself. There might be a glimpse of truth in this. But Huss’ heavy reliance on the Old Testament makes his doctrine ambiguous. He said:
“The time has come for us, just as it did for Moses in the Old Testament, to take up our swords and defend the law of God.”
The obvious question is why didn’t Huss appeal to Christ, the humble servant and the model for all Christians? Why didn’t Huss appeal to passages such as Matthew 5:43-48, which implicitly forbids serious followers of Christ to take up arms against enemies, most specifically when it comes to theological disputes?
As Jones rightly argues, whether Huss liked it or not, his statement here was an obvious appeal to the Old Testament, which Huss’s followers took to a radical height. Moreover, it makes the Protestant motto sola scriptura meaningless, because if Scripture is going to be interpreted in light of the wars and pillaging of Old Testament and not in light of Christ’s teachings, then we are in deep trouble.
Historians agree that this posed a problem for the Reformers. Even Erasmus saw that Judaica expositio—a literal interpretation of many of the Old Testament principles, such as eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth, with little regard for the teachings of the New Testament—could be a problem for the Judaizers.
Erasmus was proved right, for we know that “the philological works most frequently consulted by Christian Hebraists (such as Reuchlin’s De rudimentibus) were actually written by Jews. In addition, several important exegetical works of the early Reformation period—such as Bucer’s commentary on the Psalter (1529)—drew heavily upon medieval rabbinical sources, such as David Kimhi and Abraham Ibn Ezra and Solomon ben Isaac (Rashi) of Troyes.”
Will Durant writes that “Luther’s conception of God was Judaic. He could speak with eloquence of the divine mercy and grace, but more basic in him was the old picture of God as the avenger, and therefore of Christ as the final judge.”
Before Luther, continues Durant, judaizing rarely happened in Western culture; after Luther, “the Judaic contribution triumphed over the Greek; the Prophets won against the Aristotle of the Scholastics and the Plato of the humanists…the Old Testament overshadowed the New; Yahweh darkened the face of Christ.”
This played an influential role in Luther’s writings and teachings. And this essential point has been overlooked by many Protestant writers after Luther and beyond.
It is therefore safe to say that many during the Protestant Reformation were Judaizers, though Zwingli, on a theoretical level, was probably not one of them. Yet on a practical level Zwingli was a Judaizer and was even accused of betraying the Protestant motto, sola scriptura.
A propaganda manifesto was written in 1412 which reads,
“And so, dear holy community in Bohemia, let us stand in battle line with our head, Master Huss, and our leader, Master Jerome; and whoever will be a Christian, let him turn to us. Let everyone gird on his sword, let brother not spare brother, nor father spare son, nor son father, nor neighbor spare neighbor…All should kill so that we can make our hands holy in the blood of the accursed ones, as Moses shows us in his books; for what is written there is an example to us.”
Will Durant declared, “On July 30, 1419, a Hussite crowd paraded into New Town, forced its way into the council chamber, and threw councilors out of the windows into the street, where another crowd finished them off. A popular assembly was organized, which elected Hussite councilors.”
Pope Martin V organized a crusade against the Hussites, with king Sigismund approving it. The Hussites struck back by organizing their own army with Jan Zizka as the leader, “a sixty-year-old knight with one eye, who trained them, and led them to incredible victories.”
Zizka defeated Sigismund, then began to espouse the view that there should be no religious dissent. As a consequence of this worldview, his army
“passed up and down Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia like a devastating storm, pillaging monasteries, massacring monks, and compelling the population to accept the Four Articles of Prague. The Germans in Bohemia, who wished to remain Catholic, became the favorite victims of Hussite arms.”
The Four Articles of Prague declared that one ought to have freedom to worhip, to give no secular power to the clergy, and to punish mortal sins, yet the Hussites in general violated those principles. In other words, the document was a smokescreen for the Hussites. (However, not all Hussites were revolutionaries. There were many who were peaceful, detested wars and hatred against enemies, and practiced a return to traditional, mere, Christianity.)
Martin Luther was an admirer of Huss and believed he should not have been burned at the stake. Later, Luther argued that “the German Church should be reconciled with the Hussites of Bohemia.”
It should be made clear at the outset that there were several problems with the Reformation, but the issues were not as black and white as some historians have argued.
Calvin for example was responsible for the death of Michael Servetus, a Spanish physician who, upon reading rabbinical criticism of Christianity, no longer thought that the Trinity was valid. Servetus propounded heretical views in believing that Jesus was not co-equal with the Father, and that God the Father had to breath the Logos into Jesus. These views, among others, certainly made him a heretic, and he was disliked by both Catholics and Protestants.
After writing Christianismi Restitutio in 1546, in which he denounced the idea that God had predestined some to hell and others to heaven, Servetus sent the manuscript to Calvin. Calvin returned the favor by sending Servetus a copy of his Institutes of the Christian Religion. The die was cast.
Servetus sent Institutes back to Calvin with insulting comments because he thought Calvin was making elementary errors. Servetus made the point that it was irrational for God to send some to hell irrespective of whether they want to accept him or not and then condemn those same people for not accepting him. Calvin himself wrote in his Institutes:
“By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which He determined with Himself whatever He wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of those ends, we say that he has been predestined to life or death.”
In other words, freewill and predestination, in the Calvinist reading of things, are mutually exclusive. Moreover, those who are predestined to death are rebel sinners and therefore deserve God’s wrath! For example, you blindfold a person and then tell him to choose either right or left. And when he doesn’t choose what you want, you strike him dead. How is that logical?
Well, in the Calvinist reading of things, this is called compatibilism. It is the metaphysical idea that people are responsible and even blamed for their actions even though they cannot possibly do otherwise, even though it was God’s intention and decree that they fall into temptation and therefore be condemned!
These are essential in Calvin’s doctrine of predestination, and this is the doctrine that has been repudiated by many because it is pregnant with internal contradictions and because it makes God the author and the actual creator of sin. Listen to one Calvinist: God “can’t sin.” But two sentences later, the same author declares that God “created sin.” The Reformed author did not appeal to sola scriptura this time to propound that doctrine but appeals to the Westminster Confession in order to support his case.
By propounding this doctrine in his Institutes, Calvin made Servetus’ job easy.
Later Calvinists have found this doctrine repugnant and soon the essential doctrine of predestination as propounded by Calvin in his Institutes was “predestined” to split into five groups: five points, four points, three points, two points, and one point.
Servetus also implicitly made the point that if God condemns some for not responding to his gift of salvation, then the obvious conclusion is that God had given them the ability to respond to his calling. Modern Calvinists have struggled mightily to solve that contradiction.
Calvin, in return, wrote to one of his friends in 1546,
“Servetus has just sent me a long volume of his ravings. If I consent he will come here, but I will not give my word, for should he come, if my authority is of any avail, I will not suffer him to get out alive.”
By this time, Servetus was wanted by both Protestants and Catholics for heresy. He was arrested in Catholic lands, but barely escaped from prison and settled in Protestant Geneva, Calvin’s territory. On a Sunday, he went to church and was quickly recognized. Calvin quickly ordered his arrest.
During the trial, he was partially accused of having “in the person of M. Calvin, defamed the doctrines of the Gospel of the Church of Geneva.” On two occasions, Calvin appeared during the trial as Servetus’s accuser, though “the Protestant Council of Geneva asked the Catholic judges at Vienne for particulars of the charges that had been brought against Servetus.”
During the trial, Servetus literally begged for mercy, and two opponents of Calvin were summoned to save Servetus from burning at the stake. When the ministers declared that Servetus should be punished for his “utter lack of the spirit of meekness and docility,” he responded by saying, “You should show it toward me even though I were possessed of an evil spirit.”
Durant declared that the two opponents irritated Calvin even more than Servetus. Matteo Gribaldi, a professor of jurisprudence at Padua, called upon the people at the assembly to seriously reconsider the fraudulent civil punishment for religious opinions and matters. He was banished “on suspicion of Unitarianism.”
Gribaldi was later established as a professor of law at the University of Tubingen, but “Calvin sent word there of Gribaldi’s doubts; the university pressed him to sign a Trinitarian confession; instead he fled to Bern, where he died of the plague in 1564.”
Servetus moved on to write a reply to Calvin, in which he called Calvin “liar,” “impostor,” “hypocrite,” and “miserable wretch.” Calvin returned the favor by calling Servetus a “dirty dog” who “wiped his snout” and the “perfidious scamp.” Bainton declares that Servetus’s statement that Calvin was a “liar” was not entirely without merit. For example, Calvin, during the trial, accused Servetus of being unable to understand and read Greek, when in fact Servetus knew the language well.
Servetus was eventually condemned to be executed. Scared to death, Servetus begged Calvin to reconsider. Calvin declared that he would have a second thought if Servetus recanted from his heretical views. Servetus refused. He was eventually burned alive on October 27, 1553.
“When the executioner brought the fire before his face he gave such a shriek that all the people were horror-stricken. As he lingered, some threw on wood. In a fearful wail he cried, ‘O Jesus, Son of the Eternal God, have pity on me!’”
Many Protestant reformers were in agreement that Servetus deserved his punishment. Philip Melanchthon, a collaborator of Martin Luther, wrote a letter to Calvin and others giving “thanks to the Son of God” for the “punishment of this blasphemous man,” and declared that the burning was “a pious and memorable example to all posterity.”
Some Protestant scholars such as Alister McGrath have tried to downplay Calvin’s role in the execution, thereby giving the impression that Calvin had nothing to do with it. Yet the evidence against such a defense is found in Calvin’s own mouth.
McGrath declares that Calvin’s “tacit support for the capital penalty for offenses such as heresy which he (and his contemporaries) regarded as serious makes him a little more than a child of his age, rather than an outrageous exception to its standards…To single out Calvin for particular criticism, however, suggests a selectivity approaching victimization.”
McGrath says that Calvin’s involvement in the affair “was oblique.” Yet Calvin himself declared the opposite. McGrath continues, “The trial, condemnation and execution of Servetus were entirely the work of the city council, at a period in its history when it was particularly hostile to Calvin. The Perrinists had recently gained power, and were determined to weaken his position.”
Not so. Even other Protestant historians such as Roland H. Bainton agreed that the whole trial was orchestrated by John Calvin. Moreover, Calvin told us,
“And what crime was it of mine if our Council at my exhortation…took vengeance upon his execrable blasphemies?”
McGrath declares, “Calvin himself attempted to alter the mode of execution to the more humane beheading; he was ignored.” McGrath never tells us that it was Servetus who wanted “the more humane beheading,” to which Calvin agreed. The request was denied by the council, but Calvin had a hand in how Servetus was executed.
Calvin himself wrote a letter to the King of Navarre years later when he was still receiving criticism for his involvement in the execution, saying,
“Do not fail to rid the country of those zealous scoundrels who stir up the people to revolt against us. Such monsters should be exterminated, as I have exterminated Michael Servetus the Spaniard.”
In a rather sophisticated way of downplaying Calvin’s influence in the affair, McGrath declares, “Every major Christian body which traces its history back to the sixteenth century has blood liberally scattered over its credentials. Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Reformed and Anglican: all have condemned and executed their Servetuses, whether directly, or—as in the case of Calvin himself—indirectly.”
Calvin received widespread criticism for his act, prompting him in 1554 to write Defensio Orthodoxae Fidei de Sacra Trinitate Contra Prodigiosos Errores Michaelis Serveti, in which he quoted passages in the Old Testament such as Deuteronomy 13:5-15, 17:2, Exodus 22:20, and Leviticus 24:16 to buttress his defense of burning heretics.
“Whoever shall maintain that wrong is done to heretics and blasphemers in punishing them makes himself an accomplice in their crime…Wherefore does He [God] demand of us so extreme severity if not to show us that due honor is not paid Him so long as we set not His service above every human consideration, so that we spare not kin nor blood of any, and forget all humanity when the matter is to combat for his glory?”
By this time Calvin was already a Judaizer in applying Old Testament law to heretics. Even Durant wrote, “Whereas in general [Calvin] accepted St. Paul as his guide, he refused to use the Pauline expedient of declaring the old law superseded by the new.”
E. Michael Jones agrees with Louis Israel Newman that Calvin knew the consequences of not burning Servetus, that he was soon going to be accused of Judaizing. Diarmaid MacCulloch declares that for political reasons, Calvin wanted to prove to his enemies that he was not weak.
But by burning Servetus, Calvin implicitly ended up Judaizing anyway. This was so clear that Calvin almost applied the same Old Testament law to a close friend of his, Sebastian Castellio.
Castellio was born in France in 1515 and became erudite in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and was a Greek teacher at Lyons. He also lived with Calvin for a while and, in 1541, Calvin appointed him as rector of the Latin School at Geneva.
In time, Castellio parted company with Calvin on the doctrine of predestination and accused Calvin of intolerance, among other things, though he still admired Calvin as a friend.
Unlike Servetus, who told Calvin that Simon Magus was the real father of the doctrine of predestination, Castellio never castigated Calvin as a liar. Calvin again summoned the Council and accused Castellio. He was banished and for nine years lived in abject poverty, “supporting a large family, and working at night on his version of the Scriptures. He finished this in 1551.”
Castellio finally got to teach Greek again at the University of Basel, and was completely shocked that Calvin was the main culprit behind the execution of Servetus. Years later, Castellio produced Haereticis an Sint Persequendi (Should Heretics Be Persecuted?), in which he implied that Christ would not have burned anyone alive for being a heretic.
In order to make a rational and exegetical case, Castellio appealed to the New Testament and declared that the Old Testament laws with respect to burning heretics were out-dated.
President Donald Trump, Drain the Swamp and Lock them Up Sir.
Stew Webb Whistle blower Grand Jury Demand Still Active against Hillary Clinton aka "HildaBeast".
Bush, Obama, Clinton Founders of ISIS, ISIL, See Obama Video July 2015
George W. Bush Faces War Crimes December 12 2016 In U.S. Federal Court
(C) Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) Organized Crime Boss Hog Larry Mizel
Stew Webb 32 Years a Federal Whistleblower
Stew Webb served in the United States Marine Corps and was Honorable Discharge. Stew was a General Contractor-Home Builder until 3 car crashes in one year and is now disabled. Stew turned Federal Whistle blower-Activist of 31 years and has been a guest on over 3,000 Radio and TV Programs since September 18, 1991 and now has his own Radio and TV Network http://www.stewwebbradionetwork.com Stew was responsible for the Congressional Investigations and hearings that lead to the Appointment of Independent Prosecutor Arlin Adams in the 1989 HUD Hearings, the Silverado Savings and Loan Hearings, the Denver International Airport Frauds hearings, the MDC Holdings, Inc. (MDC-NYSE) Illegal Political Campaign Money Laundering Colorado’s biggest case aka Keating 5 hearings and the information provided that lead to the 2008 Illegal Bank Bailout.
Stew was held as a Political Prisoner from 1992-1993 to silence his exposure by Leonard Millman his former in law with illegal charges of threatening harassing telephone calls charges which were dismissed with prejudice. Leonard Millman, George HW Bush, George W Bush, Jeb Bush, Neil Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Larry Mizel, Phil Winn, Norman Brownstein, John McCain and Mitt Romney to name a few are all partners in what is known as the Bush-Millman-Clinton Organized Crime Syndicate. Leonard Millman (Deceased 2004) was member of the "Illuminati Council of 13".
You can Mute the Audio
Stew Webb Radio Network Store
Contributions are much appreciated
The below picture of the attempted murder of Stew Webb October 25, 2010 by two of Hillary Clinton's Assassins. There were two more crashed and attempts one year later.
Contributions are much appreciated Thank You.-- Stew Webb
Fair Use Notice
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.