by Jim Fetzer (with George Washington and Dave Hodges)
Obama and the Zionist hoards, including Sens. Charles Schumer and Diane Feinstein, are going “all out” to promote the interests of Israel over those of the United States.
Obama is going to make six appearances on television on Monday to further demonstrate his total willingness to betray the Constitution and the American people for his puppet masters.
The situation has never been more clear: It is AIPAC, Israel and the traitors in our midst against the United States of America. If they lose this, then Zionism is dead–and the sooner, the better. No more wars for Israel!
On the Sunday talk shows, “Face the Nation” and “Meet the Press”, I watch as Obama’s Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough, abused his position to lie repeatedly to the American people. He asserted that the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government was undisputed–when in fact Assad, Putin, and even members of the United States Congress, among them Alan Grayson, have disputed it.
He asserted that international norms will not be maintained and that Iran and North Korea would be encouraged to violate them, if there were no military response from the United States–even though a military response from the United States absent an imminent threat or approval by the Security Counsel of the United Nations would be a blatant violation of international law.
He asserted that the failure of the United States to follow through on a Presidential declaration would weaken respect for the nation in the world community–as though taking an action in violation to international law in retaliation for a false allegation of a violation of international norms would strengthen the standing of the United States in the world community!
A refreshing stance was taken by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who has been weighing the prospects for a filibuster against the resolution to authorize the bombing. During his appearance today, he said, he would demand that any vote taken by Congress be binding, meaning that the president would be barred from striking Syria without congressional approval.
“The president cannot, if we vote him down, decide to go to war anyway. That’s the way I interpret the Constitution,” Paul said on “Fox News Sunday”, where a similar opinion was advanced by David Alexrod, who had been Obama’s campaign adviser. When asked if Obama could go forward without Congressional approval, he said it was most unlikely
Even Bob Schaeffer, the usually sensible host of “Face the Nation”, concluded with the observation, “In a dangerous world, when the United States takes a stand and then goes back on its word, we are left in an even more dangerous place.” But he, like Obama, Kerry and McDonough, have been lying to the world as well as to the American people to promote the political agenda of Israel, as military and intelligence experts have confirmed as follows.
High-Level U.S. Intelligence Officers: Syrian Government Didn’t Launch Chemical Weapons
Without doubt, the Syrian rebels had access to chemical weapons … and have apparently used them in the recent past. Associated Press reported last week:
An intercept of Syrian military officials discussing the strike was among low-level staff, with no direct evidence tying the attack back to an Assad insider or even a senior Syrian commander, the officials said.
So while Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that links between the attack and the Assad government are “undeniable,” U.S. intelligence officials are not so certain that the suspected chemical attack was carried out on Assad’s orders, or even completely sure it wascarried out by government forces, the officials said.
Another possibility that officials would hope to rule out: that stocks had fallen out of the government’s control and were deployed by rebels in a callous and calculated attempt to draw the West into the war.
Reuters notes today:
With the United States threatening to attack Syria, U.S. and allied intelligence services are still trying to work out who ordered the poison gas attack on rebel-held neighborhoods near Damascus.
No direct link to President Bashar al-Assad or his inner circle has been publicly demonstrated, and some U.S. sources say intelligence experts are not sure whether the Syrian leader knew of the attack before it was launched or was only informed about it afterward.
Indeed, numerous intelligence officers say that the rebels likely carried out the August 21st attack.
For example, the Daily Caller reports:
The Obama administration has selectively used intelligence to justify military strikes on Syria, former military officers with access to the original intelligence reports say, in a manner that goes far beyond what critics charged the Bush administration of doing in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.
According to these officers, who served in top positions in the United States, Britain, France, Israel, and Jordan, a Syrian military communication intercepted by Israel’s famed Unit 8200 electronic intelligence outfit has been doctored so that it leads a reader to just the opposite conclusion reached by the original report.
According to the doctored report, the chemical attack was carried out by the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division of the Syrian Army, an elite unit commanded by Maher al-Assad, the president’s brother.
However, the original communication intercepted by Unit 8200 between a major in command of the rocket troops assigned to the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division, and the general staff, shows just the opposite.
The general staff officer asked the major if he was responsible for the chemical weapons attack. From the tone of the conversation, it was clear that “the Syrian general staff were out of their minds with panic that an unauthorized strike had been launched by the 155th Brigade in express defiance of their instructions,” the former officers say.
According to the transcript of the original Unit 8200 report, the major“hotly denied firing any of his missiles” and invited the general staff to come and verify that all his weapons were present.
The report contains a note at the end that the major was interrogated by Syrian intelligence for three days, then returned to command of his unit. “All of his weapons were accounted for,” the report stated.
An Egyptian intelligence report describes a meeting in Turkey between military intelligence officials from Turkey and Qatar and Syrian rebels. One of the participants states, “there will be a game changing event on August 21st” that will “bring the U.S. into a bombing campaign” against the Syrian regime.
The chemical weapons strike on Moudhamiya, an area under rebel control, took place on August 21. “Egyptian military intelligence insists it was a combined Turkish/Qatar/rebel false flag operation,” said a source familiar with the report.
Agents provacateurs are as old as warfare itself. What better than a false flag attack, staged by al Qaeda and its al Nusra front allies in Syria, to drag the United States into a war?
And 12 very high-level former intelligence officials wrote the following memorandum to Obama today:
We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the opportunity for what is commonly known as “plausible denial.”
There is a growing body of evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its supporters — providing a strong circumstantial case that the August 21 chemical incident was a pre-planned provocation by the Syrian opposition and its Saudi and Turkish supporters. The aim is reported to have been to create the kind of incident that would bring the United States into the war.
According to some reports, canisters containing chemical agent were brought into a suburb of Damascus, where they were then opened. Some people in the immediate vicinity died; others were injured.
We are unaware of any reliable evidence that a Syrian military rocket capable of carrying a chemical agent was fired into the area. In fact, we are aware of no reliable physical evidence to support the claim that this was a result of a strike by a Syrian military unit with expertise in chemical weapons.
In addition, we have learned that on August 13-14, 2013, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major, irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and Qatari, Turkish and U.S. intelligence officials took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, now used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors.
Senior opposition commanders who came from Istanbul pre-briefed the regional commanders on an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development,” which, in turn, would lead to a U.S.-led bombing of Syria.
At operations coordinating meetings at Antakya, attended by senior Turkish, Qatari and U.S. intelligence officials as well as senior commanders of the Syrian opposition, the Syrians were told that the bombing would start in a few days. Opposition leaders were ordered to prepare their forces quickly to exploit the U.S. bombing, march into Damascus, and remove the Bashar al-Assad government.
The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive. And they were. A weapons distribution operation unprecedented in scope began in all opposition camps on August 21-23. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. intelligence officers.
by Dave Hodges
Obama has called the chemical weapons attack last month in Damascus a case of crossing the “Red Line,” which means that Obama assumes the moral right to attack Syria. In actuality, it is Obama who has crossed the “Red Line.”
Which Side of the Red Line Are You On, Mr. President?
There is an old saying which reminds us that when we are pointing our finger at somebody, we have three fingers pointing back at us. In the case of Barak Hussein Obama and the Syrian crisis, this appears to be the case.
Obama has failed to convince the UN Security Council on the chain of custody for the chemical weapons attack in Damascus last month and yet, he is still attempting to attack Syria. No international consensus by this President but he still desires to kill tens of thousands of innocent Syrians. Who is crossing the “Red Line” now?
Your tax dollars at work.
Obama and the CIA backed al-Qaeda, the terrorists who, if we are to believe the official government stories, killed 3,000 Americans in the 9/11 attacks. Yet, Obama supported al-Qaeda in the in the overthrow and murder of Gaddafi for failing to capitulate in bowing down to the Bank of International Settlements and becoming a debt ridden nation like most of the rest of the world. Who crossed the “Red line” in Libya, Mr. President?
If the CIA will do this to them, won’t they do this to us, Mr. President?
More than 100,000 Syrian people have been killed, with nearly 7 million people uprooted from their homes. U.N. officialsestimate that 5 million have been displaced inside the country while another 2 million have fled to neighboring countries. The total carnage amounts to nearly a third of Syria’s population, which was 23 million before the fighting began. At the heart of this two-year-old revolution is the CIA backed al-Qaeda. Without CIA backing for al-Qaeda, there would be no revolution and all the aforementioned people would still be alive today. Who crossed the Red Line here, Mr. President?
Mr. President, your CIA backed al-Qaeda rebels murder Christians and purposely shell Christian villages in such places as the countryside outside of Aleppo. Who’s crossing the Red Line now, Mr. President?
Mr. President you are having your lackeys dust off the old reasons to justify the war in Iraq and applying these same excuses to Syria. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, March 23, 2003 on the eve of the Iraq war, before the House Appropriations Committee stated that ”The oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years… we are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon.” Now John Kerry is making the same exact claims about Syria. Wolfowitz’s war that was going to be financed with Arab assets cost the US taxpayer more than one trillion dollars. Obama stooge, James Carville, recently said that Bush was to blame for what is happening in Syria. If Bush is that despicable in the eyes of the Democrats, then why are Obama and Kerry dusting off Bush’s old and untrue excuses to justify war in Syria, a war that will be financed by Arab resources? In light of the fact that your people are trying to lie the American people into war under false economic pretenses, Mr. President, who is crossing the “Red Line?”
Mr. President, anyone with an IQ over room temperature knows that attacking Syria and then Iran is all about preserving the Petrodollar. The coming war has nothing to do with chemical weapons. It has to do with oil.
Amazingly, Mr. President, you have help in the mainstream media regarding the role that the preservation of the Petrodollar is providing for your apparent motivation to attack Iran who is selling its oil for gold instead of the American dollar (i. e. the Petrodollar).
Mr. President, you think you may have pulled off a clever ruse in order to justify your action against Syria along with mainstream media complicity of silence over the Petrodollar issue. I find that incredible since I have written about this since last fall and you can access the proof in the following article. I have over a dozen articles to choose from on my website, alone.
In light of the fact that these issues have been in the discussion for 9 months, and you continue to ignore the central role that the Petrodollar is playing in this conflict, who has crossed the “Red Line” now, Mr. President?
Mr. President, your lackey, John McCain, stated that if Congress votes no on a resolution calling for U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war, the resulting fallout would be “catastrophic” for America’s credibility in the world. Mr. President, are you saying, through John McCain, that you are willing to kill tens of thousands of innocent Syrian people to defend your pride? Mr. President, who has crossed the “Red Line,” now?
Mr. President, you make much of the fact that chemical weapons were used in Damascus. However, you have failed to prove that Assad is responsible. The presence of chemical weapons does not implicate anyone without direct proof which your people cannot offer. Who from the United States was responsible for the chain of custody of the laboratory analysis which would implicate Assad? Where was the laboratory analysis conducted? What independent party oversaw the analysis?
Since the NSA can spy on anyone at anytime, why did your people not discover the intention of Assad’s people to use chemical weapons, in advance, and go public at that time in order to prevent loss of life through exposure? Why should we take the word of your personal spokesman, former “I got caught by Jerome Corsi lying about my role as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam,” John Kerry?
Mr. President, Assad would have known that using chemical weapons would have invited your intervention. His forces were holding off the rebels that your administration has funded through the CIA as funneled to al-Qaeda. The rebel forces (al-CIAeda) could not hold out hope for victory without US intervention because a stalemate had been obtained and this chemical weapons false flag event perpetrated by the CIA, and the invocation of the use by the US military is the only way that balance of power could be tipped in favor of your CIA? This is a war crime, Mr. Obama. Mr. President, who has crossed the “Red Line” here?
The Real Red Line
Mr. President, isn’t it true that Valerie Jarrett, your Chief of Staff, was dismissed by Mayor Daley for her role as one of the biggest slum lord queens in Chicago history? Didn’t Jarrett’s extended family marry into the communist Weather Underground Ayers family? That would be the notorious Ayers family connected the Weathermen Underground! Who crossed the proverbial “Red Line” here, Mr. President?
Click on link below to read full report:
Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
Stew Webb Founder
Recall Your Congress and Senate