Blog Archives

Radio Debate: Professor Jim Fetzer vs Micheal Collins Piper

Veterans_Today_Jim_Fetzer_PHD

 

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanfreepress/2014/01/28/date-with-a-debate-mike-piper-vs-jim-fetzer-and-john-friend

The Ugly Truth about Michael Collins Piper, Cass Sunstein and Sandy Hook

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/25/the-ugly-truth-about-michael-collins-piper-cass-sunstein-and-sandy-hook/

 




The Ugly Truth about Michael Collins Piper, Cass Sunstein and Sandy Hook

The_Ugly_Truth_about_Michael_Collins_Piper-Sunstein_and_Sandy_Hook

By Jim Fetzer

 

Given the extraordinary attention that has been devoted to dissecting the sensational events in Tucson, Aurora, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing, I would have thought that those who deny that they were “false flag” or staged events orchestrated by elements within the federal, state and local governments are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired.

Imagine my astonishment to discover a new book, False Flags: Template for Terror (2013)–featuring images of Lee Harvey Oswald, Osama bin Laden, Timothy McVeigh, Adam Lanza and Dzhokhar Tsamaev on its cover–in which Michael Collins Piper argues instead that those who believe Sandy Hook andthe Boston bombing were false flag events are not simply wrong about the facts of the matter but are implementing the program of “cognitive infiltration” advanced by Cass Sunstein as tools of the government.

I have done research of my own on most of these subjects, including Cass Sunstein in “Birds of a Feather: Subverting the Constitution at Harvard Law“, which was first published and available at OpEdNewsuntil its editor, Rob Kall, made it unavailable, apparently because I was submitting articles about 9/11 implicating Israel in the plot.  Since no lesser an inside authority than Steve Pieczenik has confirmed that Sandy Hook was a false flag event, I was floored by Piper’s stance.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

I suppose I should not have been surprised, therefore, to discover that he also targets Alex Jones, who interviewed Pieczenik, as another Sunstein stooge.  Piper claims that those of us who are implementing Sunstein’s plan (by infiltrating JFK, 9/11 and other “truther” groups in order to sow dissension and controversy and thereby disrupt and discredit them) focus excessively on the question of HOW these events were done (such as the number of shooters that were fired in Dealey Plaza and where JFK was hit) rather than WHO was responsible and WHY.  As his book promo states,

All sorts of misleading “theories” and phony “research” muddied the waters, redirecting attention away from WHO was responsible and into focusing instead into endless competing and distracting arguments about HOW the assassination was carried out. As a consequence, truth seekers got bogged down in complicated discussions about how many shots were fired, where those shots hit JFK and how many assassins were involved. The same type of thing happened after the Oklahoma City bombing and then with 9-11 and it even took place during the past year in the wake of the tragedies at Sandy Hook and Boston. There has been a plethora of theories relating largely to inconsequential details about how these conspiracies were orchestrated and the consequence has been that much of the independent research has become bogged down in forensic and scientific debate (much of it actually ill-founded). The result is that even many Americans who suspect there’s something wrong with the U.S. government’s “official” versions of “what happened” in these cases begin to reject the idea that real conspiracies were behind these events. The truth seekers are dismissed as “nuts.”

But it appeared to me that no one can sort out what really happened WITHOUT nailing down “the details”, which are therefore ANYTHING BUT “inconsequential”. I discussed this odd and unexpected stance by Piper with John Friend, who maintains a blog about these questions and who–along with so many others–agrees with me that Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing are OBVIOUS “false flags”. So he suggested that Piper and I might have a debate about Sandy Hook, which he would host during his own radio show. He wrote to Piper and we set up the debate to occur Wednesday, 8 January 2014, from 11 AM-1 PM/ET.

The First “Debate”

Imagine our astonishment when we received an early AM email from Michael Collins Piper tells us that he was experiencing physical problems with his foot and leg and could not participate in the scheduled debate. So John notified his readers that Piper had withdrawn in this statement:

The Realist Report, 8 January 2014

He and I proceeded to have an extended, two-hour discussion about Sandy Hook, covering most of the issues,

which, to judge from comments about our conversation posted on his blog–apart from those distracted by the question of how the video footage of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower were faked–implied that we had rather thoroughly dismantled the Piper position and that there was really not a lot left to discuss. Piper, however, was enraged by John Friend’s use of the word, “backed out”, which offended his sense of fair play and justice.  Of course, he HAD withdrawn (or “backed out”) ostensibly on the basis of medical problems, which EXPLAINED why he had withdrawn but did not alter the fact of the matter.  This led to a series of extraordinary emails from Piper in which he viciously and irrationally attacked both John Friend and me, which, in my opinion, display a remarkable loss of mental balance and great emotional instability.  These emails, which were originally sent to the editors of American Free Press and of the web site, “The Ugly Truth”, which apparently is managed by Mark Glenn, Keith Johnson and Piper, are so completely disgusting that, were he to engage us in a lawsuit, as he has threatened, his attorney would move to exclude them on the ground that they are inflammatory and would bias a jury against him:

The email exchange

As you can see from this graphic, there were quite a few, more than 30 in the first set and then another 40 or more in subsequent exchanges, in the three categories (or subject lines) provided here.  The upshot, however, was that Piper insisted he still wanted to debate me over Sandy Hook, so we rescheduled the debate to be hosted by the web editor for American Free Press, David Gahary, this time on Thursday, 16 January 2014, now from 3-5 PM/ET.

The Second “Debate”

Imagine my surprise when “The Ugly Truth” published a story with the following headline on Tuesday, 14 January 2014, two days before the rescheduled debate:

Michael Collins Piper hospitalized following what cardiologists have described as ‘massive’ heart attack

 

It is with great worry and personal distress that I bring to the notice of the readers of TUT the news that our dear friend Mike Piper has been hospitalized following what cardiologists have said was a ‘massive’ heart attack.

 

It occurred last week in the middle of the night and lasted for several days afterwards. At this point he is undergoing a battery of tests to determine the extent of the damage done to his heart. I spoke with him just prior to his being taken to the emergency room yesterday and have just finished speaking to him now. He is obviously very worn out but as of this moment is in the best place he can possibly be.

Needless to say, I was not surprised. This announcement was accompanied by a blast at John Friend and me for having observed that Piper had backed out of the earlier debate, which of course was a fact. Piper had already told others that the doctors had no idea what was wrong and were going to run more tests. So I took a day to absorb the situation and then, on Wednesday, 15 January 2014, posted the following comment:My fist comment on TUTIt was predictable that I would be savaged by his supporters, but I did not expect to read comments from those more knowledgeable about cardiac issues to add their opinions to the mix,

Comment from nursing expert

which Mark Glenn dismissed with the back of his hand, remarking, “I tend to think that a cardiologist working at one of the nation’s top hospitals is slightly more qualified to make a medical diagnosis on this matter than you are.” But thenursechronicles called his bluff:

Second nurse expert comment

We have a nice encapsulation of the ethics and integrity of Mark Glenn in running “The Ugly Truth”. When I had initially express skepticism that Michael Collins Piper had suffered “a massive heart attack”, Mark Glenn had responded, “Everything that has been stated is fact as opposed to the fantasy-based stew which you spew ad nauseum. ‘Apparent mental instability’? ‘Under stress’ because of an upcoming debate? ‘Stress-induced angina’?” But his miraculous recovery in just two days offers convincing evidence that I and thenursechronicleshad it right. For a study in duplicity and the credulity of their followers, just read this blog with care.

The Third “Debate”

Because of the stress Michael Collins Piper was under and Mark Glenn’s refusal to engage in a debate in his stead, it fell to their “Number 3″, Keith Johnson, who agreed to debate me on Thursday, 23 January 2014, from 8-10 PM/CT, with David Gahary as the host. It was announced on the American Free Press web site as “Date with a Debate: Jim Fetzer vs. Keith Johnson”, on 21 January 2014, and became the most read article there. For the first time, I actually had an opponent to debate, where our exchange–the debate itself–is archived here.

The response was rather telling. Even on a relatively neutral web site where Michael Collins Piper, Mark Glenn and Keith Johnson had considerable pre-debate support, their fans were dismayed:

One comment on debate

Another baker’s dozen or more comments about the debate can be found at the AFP web site, “Date with a Debate: Fetzer vs. Johnson”, which features a post by Wolgang Halbig, the expert on school security, whom I cited toward the end of the debate and whom I also mention again below. It seems to me that he is the single best-qualified expert in a position to address these Sandy Hook questions, where I am especially glad that he surfaced in time for me to cite his research, which is on-going. James Tracy has now published a blog about him, “Retired Cop and Educator Threatened for Questioning Sandy Hook Investigation”, which includes an hour-long interview with me for “The Real Deal”.

Assessing the Outcome

Reflecting on our exchange, I think there are several reasons — apart from his obvious lack of preparation — that Keith Johnson did not fare well. One is that he never responded to the points I made right off the bat about the suppression of information about the deaths of the alleged victims. I had expected him to raise the issue of the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), which lists their names, but where it would have been the most obvious records for the government to have fixed in a case like this, where local, state and federal elements appear to be involved. I was therefore going to explain why that would be most easily fabricated evidence, which for that reason should be given the least weight.

He also never made one of the points I had anticipated by attempting to debunk the portable sign, “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN”, and the name tags on lanyards. I had gone to the trouble of contacting a former Gold Shield NYC Detective about this, where I asked him if that was standard practice or if he had ever heard of it being done a crime scene, which he answered with a simple, “No.” He is a very stand-up guy, who actually arrested one of the assassins of JFK, Frank Sturgis, when he came to New York to kill Marita Lorenz to make sure she did not testify before the House Select Committee on Assassinations when it reinvestigated the case in 1977-78. She did testify and gave it boxes of supporting evidence, which it simply ignored.

Some of the most powerful evidence I adduced concerned the strange behavior of the alleged parents and relatives of the victims, including Gene Rosen, who played a key role in confirming having heard shots from the school and comforting six of the children who survived by providing them orange juice and allowed them to play with stuffed animals. Because I found his testimony incredible, I contacted the former head of the FBI’s Rapid Response Psychiatric Unit, who confirmed what I had suspected in spades. While his analysis of the problems with Rosen’s testimony would have come to Keith as news, since it was not included in “Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax”, he should have been prepared to deal with the other points I made, most of which were taken directly from that article.

In addition, I introduced new evidence from a former Florida State Trooper and school principal, Wolfgang Halbig, who is a nationally-recognized expert on school safety and related issues. He was so troubled by the “official account” that he has made many inquiries about an FBI investigative report on Sandy Hook, which has been sent to President Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and former Director of the FBI, Robert Mueller. He has been rebuffed and told it is “classified”, but why in the world should that be the case? It ought to have been included with the “final report” from Connecticut, not withheld from the public. Because of Wolf’s inquiries about Sandy Hook, two Lake County, FL, homicide investigators showed up at his home and, on behalf of the Connecticut State Police, threatened him with prosecution should he continue to ask questions about Sandy Hook. “Why would they classify an FBI report about a school shooting”, he asks, “if it was on the up-and-up?”, which I regard as a very good question. None of this makes any sense unless we are dealing with the on-going cover-up of an elaborate hoax.

The Poll Results

I am not suggesting that my performance was flawless. During the final segment of my presentation, I cited the case of Alicia Hannan, who is a special technician for the FBI and whose husband and daughter were with her. I was sent a link about her by Keith Johnson himself, which I found very plausible. He claims to have located “Alicia”, who is actually a resident of Sandy Hook. I find that very peculiar but, if he is right, then he “snookered” me. I am more impressed by Sofia Smallstorm’s observation that, if Emilie Parker was on Obama’s knee, then she cannot be the older child who sang at the Super Bowl, which means one of those identifications must be in error. And James Tracy thought that I “lost points” by a direct exchange with Keith toward the very end, to which I plead, “Guilty!”.

But those lapses, such as they may be, do not compensate for the quality and the quantity of the evidence I advanced, where most of his responses committed one or another of the three fallacies I expected he would employ and defined at the very beginning, the straw man, by exaggerating my position to make it easier to attack; special pleading, by citing on the evidence favorable to your side and ignoring the rest; and the ad hominem, which he employed again and again in an attempt to discredit the arguments made by Mike Power, for example, where he simply ignored my own confirmation as an expert who supervised recruit training and marksmanship as a commissioned officer in the US Marine Corps.

Nevertheless, the poll results were strongly in favor of Keith Johnson. While they were initially running 3-1 in my favor over the first 120+ votes cast, the trend would later change, where a comparison of these two snap-shots is rather instructive:

The last report I have about their current totals is that Keith Johnson has around 1200 votes and I only 700, which is quite remarkable. American Free Press has determined that the poll was flawed because, simply by refreshing the page, you could vote again and again. I encourage everyone to listen to the debate and draw their own conclusions about this, since my expectation would have been — given the comparison between the earlier and later results of the second poll (about AFP doing more on Sandy Hook) — I would have expected the first poll results to have been approximately proportionally the same.

Interpreting the Outcome

The chat room was very active during the debate, but so was Mark Glenn, who made repeated efforts to bias chat room participants negatively toward me and in favor of Keith Johnson. Here is a sample from the final stages of the debate only for the purpose of illustrating the role he took in attempting to influence opinions:

[21:53:58] DaveGoldsmith : Mark is fizzling out and running out of ammo [21:54:04] mark glenn : HAHAHAHAHA [21:54:08] mark glenn : another funny one [21:54:13] Guest5806 has logged out. [21:54:14] Guest10343 has logged out. [21:54:18] AnnaSmith0 : It was I suppose the best they could do but it did not demonstrate an effective investigation [21:54:22] mark glenn : what whit [21:54:32] mark glenn : ok [21:54:36] satanicjewsclues911 : Fetzer kicked Da-Nuts.. [21:54:48] mark glenn : then if it is not accurate, then AHY are you citing it? [21:54:51] mark glenn : WHY [21:54:51] satanicjewsclues911 : What a Wimp… [21:54:53] Guest10422 has logged in. [21:54:57] TuLe0 : fetzner is a joke [21:55:00] AnnaSmith0 : No suspect statements..the dismissal of potentially relevant evidence [21:55:06] mark glenn : ok [21:55:10] mark glenn : again [21:55:23] mark glenn : WHY are you citing it [21:55:29] AnnaSmith0 : It’s all they gave [21:55:34] Fake War : when fetzer is debunked by accurate Boston Bombing and Sandy Hook investigations/documentaries – he will be shown up as the puffed out fool he is [21:55:37] mark glenn : to ? what Keith is saying? [21:55:46] mark glenn : no FW [21:55:47] AnnaSmith0 : You can’t make it up [21:55:48] Guest10437 has logged in. [21:55:50] mark glenn : he won’t [21:56:00] Guest8442 has logged out. [21:56:09] Fake War : he ought to be [21:56:10] mark glenn : arguing with people like Fetzer is like debating someone who beieves the moon is made out of swiss cheese [21:56:15] Guest10443 has logged in. [21:56:15] Guest10437 has logged out. [21:56:17] mark glenn : how do you reason with someone like this? [21:56:23] Fake War : someone should shut him up [21:56:24] DaveGoldsmith : What is Keith contributing? [21:56:24] Guest10331 has logged out. [21:56:27] TuLe0 : FW… I think all this has been debunked… 911, boston, sandy, [21:56:29] mark glenn : listen [21:56:34] DaveGoldsmith : What garbage [21:56:44] satanicjewsclues911 : What a Ignoranus. [21:56:47] mark glenn : Keith has provided hard evidence [21:57:11] mark glenn : if your brains worked you would be following up on these items [21:57:12] DaveGoldsmith : You mean he is a blowhard! [21:57:14] mark glenn : but you are not [21:57:18] mark glenn : for one of 2 reasons [21:57:20] satanicjewsclues911 : Keith sound like he is going to cry. [21:57:31] mark glenn : either you are under the spell [21:57:35] mark glenn : or you are shills [21:57:39] Guest6528 has logged out. [21:57:41] DaveGoldsmith : Give Keith a suppressant. He has lost it [21:57:48] mark glenn : No he has not [21:57:51] mark glenn : Keith was a cop [21:57:53] satanicjewsclues911 : Shills? What Dat? [21:58:01] mark glenn : he was an investigator [21:58:05] mark glenn : for almost 20 yeaaars [21:58:07] mark glenn : years [21:58:12] mark glenn : he did this for a living [21:58:18] satanicjewsclues911 : Big Deal, more reason not to Trust him [21:58:36] mark glenn : oh, so we trust Fetzer instead? [21:58:39] mark glenn : yeah, makes sense [21:58:40] DaveGoldsmith : He wants more “stuff”. Man, Keith’s intellect does not reach Dr. Fetzer’s ankle. [21:58:42] Guest10240 has logged out. [21:58:42] mark glenn : congrats [21:58:43] Guest10526 has logged in. [21:58:48] mark glenn : you get the idiot of the night award [21:58:52] mark glenn : after Fetzer of course [21:59:00] Guest10535 has logged in. [21:59:05] Guest10201 has logged out. [21:59:30] Guest10562 has logged in. [21:59:32] DaveGoldsmith : Dr. Fetzer won hands down [21:59:57] Guest9087 has logged out.

Let me add that I bore no ill-will toward any of “The Ugly Truth” crowd before I discovered their support for the “official accounts” of Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing. In fact, I interviewed both Mark Glenn and Michael Collins Piper on “The Real Deal” in the past,

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 30, 2010

Mark Glenn USS Liberty

 

MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2010

Mark Glenn / Denis Rancourt What’s up with Obama’s Staff? / The 9/11 Movement

 

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2012

Michael Collins Piper / Joshua Blakeney & Mimi the Syrian Girl THE NEW BABYLON / The Syrian Situation

 

FRIDAY, AUGUST 10, 2012

Michael Collins Piper FINAL JUDGMENT: Israel’s role in JFK’s assassination

 

Perhaps even more strikingly, during the Santa Barbara 50th Observance event, “JFK: The Assassination of American”, during my keynote address and following,




Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax

Top_Ten_Reasons_Sandy_Hook_was_A_Hoax

by Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Jim Fetzer and the Sandy Hook Research Group

“[T]he names and ‘contextually identifying information of involved children’ were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings”–Reuben F. Bradford, Commissioner, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Everyone must check inThe New York Times, our nation’s newspaper of record (which records the “official history” of the United States), has reported that, with its “final report,” the criminal investigation of Sandy Hook by the State of Connecticut is over. 

 

Remarkably, the report does not even include the names, the ages or the sex of the alleged victims of the shooting. There is no actual identification of any of the dead. Even the Danbury, CT, Newstimes found it unsatisfying.

 

And the 52 “autopsy photos” that accompany the report are redacted. The New York Times itself now appears to be responsible for a stunning display of journalistic incompetence on a matter of enormous public concern. 

 

Anyone with the inclination can comb through hundreds of years of American crime reports and will not find an instance in the which the names, the ages or the sex of the victims is not given–with the exception of victims of sex crimes.  Withholding this information is part of a pattern of deception and deceit that extends to the Clerk of Newtown making secret arrangements with the state legislature to avoid releasing death certificates to the public, attempts to withhold the 911 calls and gag orders imposed upon those responsible for tearing down the building itself:

 

In a letter accompanying the report, Reuben F. Bradford, the commissioner of the state’s Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, said the names and “contextually identifying information of involved children” were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings. “All visual images depicting the deceased have been withheld,” he added, “as well as written descriptions whose disclosure would be highly offensive to a reasonable person and would violate the constitutional rights of the families.”

 

The commissioner said that balancing the “often competing interests of government transparency and individual privacy has been difficult,” but the situation is completely absurd.  This appears to be only the latest in a series of obscene measures being adopted to conceal from the public that the Sandy Hook “massacre” was in fact an elaborately staged hoax, which no one who takes a serious look at the evidence can reasonably deny because, in view of what we have now proven about the event, no alternative explanation is reasonable.

 

The basic principle that applies here is inference to the best explanation. Consider the totality of the evidence in this case.  Is the evidence more probable on the hypothesis that Sandy Hook was a real event or that it was instead an exercise (or a “drill”) , which was presented as though it had been a real event?  The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable, which, when the evidence has “settled down,” is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science. Here are the “top ten” reasons that support the conclusion that Sandy Hook was staged and not real, where no children or adults appear to have died there.

 

1. Proof of death has been suppressed

 

UntitledTwenty-eight people allegedly died: 27 children and adults, including Adam Lanza,  at the school, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, in her home at 36 Yogananda Street, Newtown. However, there is no direct proof of their death: no photographic evidence or video footage was released to confirm the official story that these 28 persons actually died. In fact, no video surveillance footage shows anything—not even Adam shooting out the front plate-glass window or walking through the halls like Rambo, even though this is a school that had updated its security system at the start of the 2012-13 academic year.

 

The best the authorities could come up with was a heavily redacted report that includes numerous photos of the inside of the school, with a few dings that look like bullet holes, several bullets on the floor, and many black images with white numbers, which we are supposed to associate with dead people. One photo (left) shows the blown-out glass window through which Adam Lanza presumably entered the premises. But how did he get past the furniture, with all his weaponry, without moving anything out of position?

 

Compounding the situation, the parents were not even allowed to view their children’s bodies to identify them. Instead, they were reportedly shown photographs of the deceased. This was done, according to the Medical Examiner, Wayne Carver, in order to “control the situation.” But what was there about the situation that required “control”? No parent of our acquaintance would have agreed to accept the death of a child without viewing the body. James Tracy has published a discussion of the medical examiner’s performance.  According to Carver:

 

Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—

 

Remarkably, the state has done its best to avoid releasing the death certificates and even recordings of the 911 calls. Death certificates were eventually “released” but not to the public or those who might want to investigate the case further, where only a short, general summary was available. According to The New York Times, in relation to the 911 calls, “no children are identified by name, no callers indicate that they can see a child being shot, and the only injury described is that of an educator’s being shot in the foot.”

 

Moreover, the funerals were all “closed casket,” with one exception—that of Noah Pozner. As recounted in interviews with the families, the circumstances of their last encounters with their children (or with their caskets) are strange to say the least. The “love fest” at the white coffin of Grace McDonnell was detailed on CNN for Anderson Cooper:

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Veronique Pozner gave her account of her last look at her son Noah to the Jewish Daily Forward on 26 December 2013.

 

Veronique asked the medical examiners not to autopsy her son; she felt that his body had suffered too many indignities. At his funeral, Noah was dressed in a suit and tie. A Jewish friend of Veronique’s at work enjoined Rabbi Praver to allow him to be wrapped in a blue tallis, even though he had not yet had a bar mitzvah.

The family placed stuffed animals, a blanket and letters to Noah into the casket. Lastly, Veronique put a clear plastic rock with a white angel inside — an “angel stone” — in his right hand. She asked the funeral director to place an identical one in his left, which was badly mangled.

Just before the ceremony, Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy came to the funeral home to pay his respects. Veronique took him by the arm and brought him to the casket. Noah’s famously long eyelashes — which she spoke about in her eulogy — rested lightly on his cheeks and a cloth covered the place where the lower half of his face had been. “I just needed it to be real for [the governor],” she says. “This was a live, warm, energetic little boy whose life was snuffed out in a fraction of a second because our schools are so defenseless.”

 

2. Emergency protocols were not followed

 

There is no evidence of any frantic effort to save lives or to remove bodies to hospitals; instead the scene outside the school looked calm and largely bloodless—with police and other personnel milling around casually and a severe shortage of dead or injured victims. One Sandy Hook researcher decided to call Lt. Paul Vance to ask who cleaned up the blood, which would have been considered to be a bio-hazard, and got the reply, “What blood?” Here is Jim Fetzer’s interview with Kelley from Tulsa on “The Real Deal” where she discusses this, which also includes several of the 911 calls:

 

 

 

 

Kelley was onto a real issue. Under the CT Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988, a paper trail must kept by all parties involved in the clean up and must be tracked all the way to the incinerator with names and dates.

 

In a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) like Sandy Hook, the proper protocol is START triage (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) using tarps of different colors with the aim being to save lives and get the injured to the hospital for treatment.  Not even the black tarps for the dead were used, much less the red ones for those who needed immediate treatment.  As Sofia Smallstorm has documented, nothing at all like this occurred at Sandy Hook: the appropriate protocols were not followed:

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Sandy Hook Fire Chief Bill Halstead was ready to help the victims but could recall only two wounded people. A few survivors were reportedly taken to the hospital, but, oddly, these people were never interviewed. There were no first-hand accounts that proved anyone was killed or injured. Nonetheless, according to Lt. Vance, 18 children were pronounced dead at the scene, two children were removed to “an area hospital” and were pronounced dead at the hospital, and seven adults were pronounced dead at the scene, including the shooter (NBC).

 

No emergency vehicles were present at the school or even lined up in the fire lane for a rescue attempt—the parking lot was filled with parked cars, police cars and possibly media vehicles. Such rescue activity as occurred was centered, not on the school premises, but at the nearby Firehouse. Emergency vehicles at the Firehouse were jammed together impeding access to the school, in case anyone might have thought about attempting a rescue. The scene at the Firehouse was quite peculiar, with people milling around and circling through the building, walking out one door and into another, to give the impression of lots of people and lots of action:

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

3. Drill protocols were followed instead

 

We are now living in a security state, and the school system is among its beneficiaries. While we used to have “fire drills” from time to time, we now have “lockdown drills” implemented by school districts, with some states requiring a set number of drills by law. Private security firms, which operate for profit, now conduct “crisis preparedness assessments” at the tax-payer’s expense.

 

Larger scenarios are also developed as active-shooter drills, in which local law enforcement can take part in storming a school in pursuit of an active-actor-shooter. One such plan available on the web is “Operation Closed Campus” developed in Iowa following guidance set forth by the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) of the US Department of Homeland Security.

 

According to protocol, everyone at the drill must check in, identification badges are issued to personnel and observers, and drinking water and restrooms are available. Personnel include the director, staff, controllers, evaluators, actors, media personnel and “players” (agency employees) both in uniforms and civilian clothes. This protocol appears to have been followed at Sandy Hook, where many participants wore ID/identification badges on lanyards, a huge check-in sign is visible and even Porta Potties are at the ready.

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

An emergency preparedness drill took place on 14 December 2012, 9 AM to 4 PM/ET, in Bridgeport, CT, which is a 20 minute drive from Sandy Hook. The course was run by the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection/Emergency Management and Homeland Security, entitled “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.”

 

The Sandy Hook “shooting” appears to have been an Integrated Capstone Event (ICE), an exercise run by FEMA to coordinate federal, state and local emergency response teams in the case of a mass-casualty event. As such, it would have utilized actors and media partners to simulate a tragedy in order to train participants, and also in order to observe the reaction of the citizenry.

 

4. There was foreknowledge of the event

 

The Connecticut state emergency system was taken over long before the “massacre” occurred, with a frequency change implemented five hours in advance of the “shooting.” Normal police and EMS dispatch protocol, using the Alpha Phonetic System for communications between officers and dispatchers, was replaced with staged transmissions by non-trained personnel.

 

In addition, tweets about the shooting began before it occurred, a tribute was apparently uploaded one month before the event, and web pages honoring the victims, including a Facebook page R.I.P. Victoria Soto, were established before they had “officially” died.

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

A Sandy Hook timeline has been reconstructed at memoryholeblog.com, detailing major developments and highlighting the numerous inconsistencies in reports by the media.

 

5. There were contradictory reports about the weapons

 

According to initial reports in the media, weapons used in the shooting included four handguns recovered at the scene, the only guns taken into the school (NBC). Then an AR-15 was said to have been found in the trunk of Lanza’s car (NBC). Then it was reported that Lanza may have carried only two handguns and that a rifle was also found in the school (NBC).

 

Dr. Carver's bizarre presss conference

 

Wayne Carver, the Medical Examiner, said that all the victims were shot with the “long weapon.” Lt. Paul Vance then said that a Bushmaster AR-15 assault weapon with high capacity magazines was used “most of the time” and that Lanza was carrying “many high-capacity clips” for the weapon (Huffington Post).

 

In January 2013, Connecticut state police released a statement indicating that they had found four guns inside the school: a Bushmaster .223 caliber XM 15-E2S semi-automatic rifle with high capacity 30 round clips, a Glock 10-mm handgun and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun. They said they also found an Izhmash Canta-12 12-gauge shotgun in Lanza’s car (NBC).

 

This shotgun is also shown in a video aired on the night of 14 December 2013  by NBC. An evidence collection team and a policeman find the gun in the trunk of Lanza’s Honda Civic—the policeman handles the gun without gloves and ejects the ammunition on the spot. Some have seen two long guns in the trunk in the NBC video: the 12-gauge shotgun and the Bushmaster rifle.

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Lt. Vance then asserted that Lanza had killed all his victims with the .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle (ctpost.com). Regarding the confusion, Vance told reporters, “It’s all these conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters.” Perhaps “The Top Prize for Fantastical Reporting” goes to Fox News, however, which announced that a 12-gauge shotgun along with two magazines containing 70 rounds of Winchester 12-gauge shotgun rounds had been found in the glove compartment of Adam Lanza’s Honda Civicthat’s right, in the glove compartment.

 

6. Adam Lanza cannot have done the shooting

Adam Lanza, reportedly a frail young man weighing 120 pounds with Asperger’s Syndrome, is said to have carried massive weaponry on his person when he shot his way into the Sandy Hook school and proceeded to kill 26 people and then himself. This after he supposedly killed his mother before driving to the school.

 

Adam Lanza

 

According to State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky, Lanza killed his 26 victims with the Bushmaster .223-caliber rifle and then killed himself with his Glock 10-mm handgun. Lanza was also supposedly carrying three 30-round magazines for the Bushmaster as well as a Sig-Sauer 9 mm handgun (see above). The victims were shot multiple times each in a fusillade of bullets from these military-style weapons. In order to wreak this havoc, he fired more than 150 rounds, and he must have carried more rounds in addition. Lanza was reportedly found dead wearing a bulletproof vest and military-style clothing (AP).

As Mike Powers, a professional military investigator and ballistics expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have carried all these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person. Furthermore, since first responders were supposedly inside the school within seven minutes, there was not enough time for Lanza to have carried out the shooting as reported. In an interview with Joyce Riley, Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously without destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the Bushmaster. As a novice, he could not have shot an AR-15 with such speed and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8-10 times without a stoppage.

According to Lt. Vance on the night of the shooting, one victim survived.




Simon Shack, obf and the 9/11 “September Clueless” distractors

Simon_Shack_obf_911_Setember_Cluless_Distractors

by  Don Fox,  Ian Greenhalgh  and  Jim Fetzer

destructionOf all the positions that have been taken about 9/11, which range from the “official” collapse theory to the use of nanothermite to conventional explosives to DEWs, nukes mini or large, from a purely philosophical point of view, perhaps the most extreme is that adopted by Simon Shack (SS) and his followers, including onebornfree (obf), who claim that all the footage of the destruction sequence in New York City is fake and unreliable.

 

This is striking because that footage has virtually universally been regarded as some of the most important evidence about what actually happened there on 9/11.

 

Since the Twin Towers are shown blowing apart in every direction from the top down, for example, while being converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust, it serves as the foundation for one line of argument that demonstrated the “official” account cannot possibly be true, since the Twin Towers are not undergoing any kind of collapse.

 

If all of the videos had been faked, one might have expected they would show the towers collapsing, not blowing apart in every direction. And this is not the most bizarre of their positions.

 

Here is a sample of the kinds of visual studies that support the conversion of the towers into dust:

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Simon Shack and onebornfree, alas,  have never offered the least indication of what they think we should have seen, had we had access to authentic video footage.  But there are many other kinds of evidence which goes far beyond the visual evidence they fixate upon:

 

(1) They were standing, then they were gone.

(2) It happened in a very brief period of time.

(3) Millions of cubic yards of dust emerged.

(4) They were destroyed below ground level.

(5) We have the so-called “toasted cars”

(6) And massive parts blown great distances

(7) There were videos and there were photos.

(8) There were many witnesses observing.

(9) We have cancer rates among responders.

(10) We have USGS dust samples.

(11) We have seismic readings.

(12) We have acoustical recordings.

 

The evidence derived from these sources can be used to sort out various alternative possibilities:

 

(h1) natural causes (earthquake, tornado,…)

(h2) collapse due to plane crashes and fires.

(h3) classic controlled demolitions (a pair).

(h4) non-conventional mode of destruction;

(h4a) lasers, masers or plasmoids;

(h4b) directed energy weaponry;

(h4c) nukes (large/small/micro/mini/)

 

So far the evidence most strongly supports (h4c), which we have explained repeatedly in a series of articles beginning with “9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II”. Clare Kuehn has offered a list of oddities that would almost certainly not have been present had all of the videos been faked or under control:

 

 

While Clues agrees that SS and obf have blundered on the destruction footage, she accents that the Clues andLetsRoll forums have exposed media control and some forms of fakery, for lack of a better term, including evidence of layering to conceal parts of images (for adding planes and in long shots) and the exensive interpolation of fake victims–including one head on up to eight different bodies.

 

The SS/obf Gambit

 

SS and obf do not discuss the evidence apart from the video footage and never address the question of why we cannot possibly know what happened on the basis of the totality of the evidence available for study. Instead, in response to the observation that the video footage is taken from many locations and perspectives, some from the air and some from across the Hudson River, where it all “hangs together” in the right way, they go on the attack, as in this post from obf attacking Jim Fetzer for making this argument:

 

1] there is never any need or requirement for the investigating “scientist” to ever closely scrutinize/compare even one of the 911 videos or photos, both with other 911 photos/videos, nor with pre-911 imagery, before accepting those videos/photos as indisputably genuine evidence.

2] there is never any need/requirement for the investigating “scientist” to ever try to authenticate even one of the alleged authors of any of the videos/photos before accepting their videos/photos as indisputably genuine evidence.

3] there is never any need/requirement for the investigating “scientist” to ever do extensive background checks on any/all alleged eyewitnesses and their out of court, not under oath testimony before accepting their testimony as indisputably genuine evidence.

The investigating “scientist” is perfectly free to claim anything that he/she feels is real is in fact real evidence, based on nothing more than personal bias/whim.

If, dear reader, any of the above 3 points even remotely apply within the general world of scientific research, [i.e. outside of 911 research] , and Mr Fetzer’s “scientific methodology” [ i.e. “if it looks good without closely checking/cross-checking then its genuine”], is simply par for the course, then I would suggest that the whole field of scientific research is in very, very deep trouble.

 

But this is a grossly exaggerated distortion of Jim’s actual position that is easier to attack, which makes it a nice example of the straw man fallacy.  1], 2] and 3] would appropriate if there were good reasons to doubt the photographic and video record.  We know that to be the true in the case of the plane videos–and we have taken them apart.  But obf and SS have really not given us any good reasons to doubt that the voluminous record of destruction videos and photos are fake.

 

There are too many from too many directions of enormous variation in quality, including of high definition, to take their claims seriously. At one point I looked at the wavy clouds of smoke with their repetition and changes in the background and color and tint variations, all of which appear to be post-production in messing with those photos and films–not necessarily for disinformational purposes, but because of multiple cases of copying and other sources of minor distortions.

 

They made valuable contributions exposing fakery in the airplane footage, but overgeneralized to conclude that all of the video footage had to be fake. So instead of contributing to SOLVING THE PROBLEM of what actually happened in New York City on 9/11, THEY DECLARE THE PROBLEM TO BE UNSOLVABLE. Here is some of the most fascinating footage that is incompatible with standard explosives or with any kind of collapse theory:

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

That is completely unscientific, where ofb’s complete lack of understanding of scientific method is no where more manifest than in his disregard for the rest of the evidence, which we enumerated as (1) through (12) above. Indeed, it is a basic principle of scientific reasoning that it be based upon all the evidence available. Failing to do so entails the commission of the fallacy of special pleading, which is common with politicians, editorial writers and used-car salesmen. That is where he stands.

 

That SS and obf even deny the existence of nuclear weapons tells me we are not dealing simply with persons of diminished capacity for serious research but demonstrable fakes and frauds. And while Clare will continue to treat them with kindness, it has become all too clear that they are shilling for Israel by doing their best to conceal that the towers were nukes and they must have been Israeli.

 

The US nuclear arsenal is under very tight but not perfect control, while Israeli nukes are not. Israel has not even admitted that it has a vast stockpile of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons–though it is common knowledge in the Middle East and among experts. SS and obf are using the pretense of science to attack those who are exposing the truth about 9/11, as Don Fox and Ian Greenhalgh explain in the study that follows.

 

NYC 9:11

 

By Don Fox and Ian Greenhalgh

 

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” – Vladimir Lenin

 

Simon Shack, hoi.polloi, Ab Irato, El Buggo and Onebornfree are the latest disinfo crew to attempt to conceal the nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 by any and all means necessary. Preceding them have been such luminaries of the “Truth Movement” as Steve Jones, Richard Gage, Christopher Bollyn, Mark Bilk, Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, Thomas Potter, Emmanuel Goldstein, S. Tiller and Pete Santilli, among others.

 

A lot of effort has gone into constructing various ruses to fool the public. The Official Conspiracy Theory posits that 19 Islamic hijackers wielding box cutters were responsible for all of the destruction. The woefulness of that theory became readily apparent soon after 9/11 and it gave rise to a number of alternative theories.

 

The first to gain prominence was the pyrotechnic nanothermite promoted by Jones, Gage, Bilk and Bollyn among others. Alas non-explosive nanothermite has no explanatory power for what happened to the WTC buildings as has been previously documented. As the inadequacy of the nanothermite theory became apparent, Judy Wood’s directed energy weapon (DEW) non-theory started to gain prominence.

 

While Dr. Wood claims not to have a theory, it states plainly on the cover of her book Where Did the Towers Go?“Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11″. A key element of Wood’s position is that no bombs (nuclear or conventional) were used on 9/11. Dr. Wood’s non-theory runs out of steam once you realize that the WTC buildings exploded, high temperatures persisted at the WTC site for six months after 9/11, and that evidence for fission and fusion abound at Ground Zero.

 

However, the indefensibility of the Judy Wood Cult’s non-theory pales in comparison to the utterly ludicrous rantings of the September Clues forum. Simon Shack and others have constructed an utterly bizarre 9/11 mythology which would have you believe that the Twin Towers were completely vacant after the 1993 bombing, that nobody died on 9/11 and that the entire event was a Hollywood-style production, where the actual destruction of the WTC buildings was obscured by military smoke-machines.

 

Completely Bizarre Scenario

 

According to posts on their forum, the Twin Towers were destroyed from the bottom up by conventional explosive charges. Nobody saw this as the television audience was shown fabricated movie footage prepared in advance of the event. A top-down, near free fall “collapse” of the Twin Towers is impossible to their minds, which means any and all videos and pictures depicting such occurrence have to be fake.

 

I have never seen a witness report the events as having happened that way. All of the witness reports I have read depict the events as having happened as the available videos and pictures show it. There is a huge gap between the September Clues version of 9/11 and the version that the rest of the world accepts. Here is a summation of the September Clues Forum’s positions:

 

It is fair to say the September Clues research has established these 4 main points:

1- The 9/11 imagery was nothing but a Hollywood-style film production, complete with actors in the role of ‘eye-witnesses’ or ‘firefighters’, staged ‘running crowds’, 3D-compositing and special cinematic effects. The ’9/11 movie’ was split into a number of short clips and sold to the TV audience as ‘newscasts’. The few clips featuring ‘airplanes’ (or dull silhouettes thereof) were computer-generated images – all of which in stark conflict with each other, as now comprehensively demonstrated in every imaginable manner, angle and method.

2- No commercial airliners were hijacked or – much less – crashed into the WTC towers, the Pentagon or the Shanksville field. No valid/verifiable records exist for : their airport logs/schedules, their numbered parts, their alleged passengers. Their reported speeds at near sea-level as well as the absurd visuals of their total, effortless disappearance into the WTC façades defy the laws of mechanics and physics – and the absence of visible wake vortexes in the WTC impact imagery also defies the laws of aerodynamics.

3- The World Trade Center Complex (9 buildings in all) were demolished with powerful explosives. No image-analyses of the tower collapses can help determine just what type of explosives were employed – since the videos are 3D animations and do not represent the real-life events. In reality, as they collapsed, the WTC complex was most likely enveloped by military-grade smoke obscurants. No real/private imagery exists of the morning’s events – ‘thanks’ to electromagnetic countermeasures.

4- No “3000″ people were trapped in the top floors/nor perished in the WTC towers. Only one thing was more important to the perps than avoiding a mass murder of 3000 US citizens : to sell the notion that “bogeyman Bin Laden” killed 3000 US citizens. We have renamed the ‘victims’ of these psy-operations “VICSIMS” (SIMulated VICtims). In fact, our research has seen the same pattern emerge in all the so-called “Al-Qaeda Terror Attacks” around the world (LONDON 7/7, MADRID 11, BALI, MUMBAI, etc…). In all logic, the very last aggravation the plotters behind these false-flag operations wish to have, are scores of real families hounding them forever with real questions and real class actions. Hence: NO real terror victims = Logical PsyOp rationale.

9/11 is but a giant – and still ongoing – money-making scam. It rotates around the most well-funded and profitable hoax of modern history. Everyone involved in the scheme is reaping a sizable return from their ‘investment bond’ which, naturally, has “SILENCE” printed all over it. For anyone to ‘speak out’ would be both ruinous and suicidal – a most distasteful option. To be sure, ‘suicidal heroics’ only exist in journalistic fairy-tales such as the outlandish news media’s narrative of 9/11 and its “nineteen religious fanatics”. The skeptics objecting that “too many people would have had to be in on this” fail to account for the most fundamental aspect of human nature: our survival instinct.

The master plan of 9/11 was to demolish the redundant, asbestos-filled WTC complex in Lower Manhattan – 9 buildings in all. The area would naturally be evacuated (as for all such demolitions) in order to prevent a slaughterhouse of dreadful proportions – not a good idea at all. To be sure, this was no mass murder scheme – just a formidable opportunity for massive financial gains and military propaganda. The military (and its various intelligence affiliates) would manage the ground logistics, such as securing the area, raising smokescreens to hide the proceedings from public view, and last but not least, electromagnetic countermeasures to keep any private cameras from filming the mayhem. The WTC complex was thus ‘safely’ destroyed in bright daylight. It was a magician’s trick, pulled off by sleight of hand to fool the few (the NY onlookers) – and with computer graphics to fool the world (the TV viewers).

 

Nobody died? The real destruction of the WTC buildings was somehow hidden from view? So what gives? Either September Clues knows something that the rest of us do not or they are completely out to lunch.

 

A cursory examination of their forum leads one to believe that the later has a much higher probability of being true than the former. For instance there is an entire thread devoted to proving that satellites are fake. During an interview with Ab Irato on 28 December 2013, for example, Simon Shack denies Earth-orbiting satellites exist:

 

 

 

 

They appear to be denying the existence of satellites as satellites can be used to prove the Earth is round.Cartesian has an excellent post in the Flat Earth Discussion Boards:

 

Breaking News: Satellites DO Exist

Flat Earthers don’t believe in satellites as the existence of satellites can be used to disprove that the earth is flat. Satellites can take pictures of a round earth and Flat Earthers don’t like to see them. For Flat Earthers, those pictures are fabricated. Geostationary satellites are even worse. In order for an object to be geostationary, the object must orbit around the earth at the same angular velocity as earth’s rotation and at a certain altitude above the equator such that the centrifugal force due to the orbital movement is equal to the gravitational force.

An object cannot orbit a flat earth while remaining stationary above it. Furthermore, geostationary orbit is at 22,000 miles from earth, way above the Flat Earth sun. So satellite existence simply doesn’t fit into Flat Earth model.

Flat Earthers say GPS works based on LORAN (LOng RAnge Navigation), a terrestrial radio navigation system. Radio can travel long distance in the Flat Earth model because the earth is flat. Flat Earthers also say that satellite TV works based on transmission towers. Dishes don’t get signal from a geostationary satellite but rather from a very tall tower somewhere.

But how tall can these towers be? And where are they exactly located? Before answering my questions, I will show you some pictures taken in some places near the equator for you to ponder.

Satellite Dishes

Everyone who lives where I come from is used to this kind of scenery. We all believe that satellites do exist since birth because the proof is everywhere around us. So yes we are all born Round Earthers.

 

The Flat Earth Model

 

Modern hypotheses supporting a flat Earth originated with English inventor Samuel Rowbotham (1816–1884). Based on his incorrect interpretation of experiments on the Bedford Level, Rowbotham published a 16-page pamphlet, called “Zetetic Astronomy”, which he later expanded into a 430-page book, Earth Not a Globe, expounding his views. According to Rowbotham’s system, the earth is a flat disc centered at the North Pole and bounded along its southern edge by a wall of ice (Antarctica), with the sun and moon 3,000 miles (4,800 km) and the “cosmos” 3,100 miles (5,000 km) above earth. He also published a leaflet entitled “The inconsistency of Modern Astronomy and its Opposition to the Scriptures!!” which argued that the “Bible, alongside our senses, supported the idea that the earth was flat and immovable and this essential truth should not be set aside for a system based solely on human conjecture.

 

One of the many problems with the Flat Earth Model is the Earth rotates on its axis and has a Northern and Southern Hemisphere. The Earth tilts on its axis and this is what gives us the four different seasons. How does a Flat Earth person account for the four seasons? Why do hurricanes spin counter-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and typhoons spin clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere?

 

This Just In: Earth is ROUND

The Earth isn’t flat, that’s for sure. And if you look at a photograph, the Earth really looks round. But how round is it?

The actual shape of the Earth is actually an oblate spheroid – a sphere with a bulge around the equator. The Earth is bulged at its equator because it’s rapidly rotating on its axis. The centripetal force of the rotation causes the regions at the equator to bulge outward. And it actually makes a pretty big difference. The diameter of the Earth, measured across the equator is 43 km more than when you measure the diameter of the Earth from pole to pole.

This bulge has some interesting implications. For example, it means that the point on Earth furthest from the center isn’t actually Mount Everest, but Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador. Only because Chimborazo is closer to the Earth’s equator.

 

 

 

 

Human Remains Found at Ground Zero

 

If nobody died at Ground Zero on 9/11 then why were human remains found?

 

Jim Riches pulled his firefighter son’s mangled body out of the rubble at the World Trade Center, but the phone calls still filtered in years afterward. The city kept finding more pieces of his son.

“They’ll call you and they’ll tell you, ‘We found a shin bone,’” said Riches, a retired deputy fire chief. “Or: ‘We found an arm bone.’ We held them all together and then we put them in the cemetery.”

Those are the phone calls both dreaded and hoped for among the families of Sept. 11 victims. And as investigators began sifting through newly uncovered debris from the World Trade Center this week for the first time in three years, those anxieties were renewed more than a decade after the attacks.

But there was also hope that more victims might yet be identified after tens of millions have been spent on the painstaking identification process. Two potential human remains were recovered on Monday, according to the medical examiner.

“We would like to see the other 40 percent of the families who have never recovered anything to at least someday have a piece of their loved one,” Riches said. “That they can go to a cemetery and pray.”

 

About 60 truckloads of debris that could contain tiny fragments of bone or tissue were unearthed by construction crews that have been working on the new World Trade Center in recent years. That material is now being transported to a park built on top of the former Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island, where investigators will attempt to find any possible remains during the next 10 weeks, the city said. That’s the material the two potential human remains were found in.

 

Some 2,750 people died at the World Trade Center in the 2001 terrorist attacks, but only 1,634 people have been identified.

 

“We have been monitoring the World Trade Center site over time and monitoring the construction,” said Ellen Borakove, a spokeswoman for the medical examiner’s office. “And if they see any material that could possibly contain human remains, we collect that material.”

 

About 9,000 human remains recovered from the ruins of the World Trade Center remain unidentified because they are too degraded to match victims by DNA identification. The remains are stored at an undisclosed location monitored by the medical examiner’s office and will eventually be transferred to a subterranean chamber at the National September 11 Memorial & Museum.

 

If nobody died why was so much money paid out to the families?

 

Paying Off the Victims: September 11th Victim Compensation Fund

 

Just eleven days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Congress created the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. It was a unique, unprecedented commitment to compensate families who lost a loved one on 9/11 and survivors who were physically injured. In its haste, Congress provided very few guidelines as to how the funds should be distributed and set no limit on the size of awards. Instead, it gave a single individual nearly unlimited discretion to manage the program.

 

Attorney General John Ashcroft appointed Kenneth Feinberg to administer the fund, handing him sole responsibility for calculating the dollar value of over 5,500 dead and injured in the worst peacetime disaster in U.S. History. In this he was supported by some 30 lawyers from his law firm and his wife, Diane “Dede” Shaff Feinberg.

 

Kenneth Feinberg: The Zionist Hush Money Specialist

 

Kenneth Feinberg is a Jewish lawyer known for wearing expensive Brioni suits, smoking Cuban cigars and his love of opera. He has become (in)famous for his handling of many high-profile litigations. A partial list of cases in which Feinberg has handled settlement payments:

 

* Penn. State sex abuse scandal involving Jewish football coach Jerry Sandusky

* Agent Orange product liability – class action by 250,000 Vietnam veterans

* Abraham Zapruder JFK film – one of three arbitrators who determined the fair market value of the film

* Holocaust slave labor litigation – one of two arbitrators

* Aurora, CT theatre shootings

* Sandy Hook school shootings

* Virginia Tech. mass shooting – administered the Hokie Spirit Memorial Fund

* Boston Marathon bombing

* Hurricane Katrina

* BP Gulf Oil Spill

 

With a resume like that, it would appear that Kenneth Feinberg is the man the Zionists turn to whenever they need to cover something up and distribute hush money in the form of compensation.

 

For three years working pro bono as head of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, Feinberg reached out to all who qualified to file a claim, evaluated applications, determined appropriate compensation and distributed awards. Feinberg spent almost all of his time meeting with the 9/11 families, convincing them of the generosity and compassion of the program and calculating appropriate awards for each and every claim. He personally took part in most of the 1,500 hearings with survivors and victims’ families and his staff of 200 spent 33 months investigating claims and deciding benefits. Feinberg told ABC News on Dec. 19, 2003:

 

It’s a brutal, sort of cold thing to do. Anybody who looks at this program and expects that by cutting a U.S. Treasury check you are going to make 9/11 families happy is vastly misunderstanding what’s going on with this program.”

 

When the program was launched, many families criticized it as a brazen, tight-fisted attempt to protect the airlines from lawsuits. The Fund was also attacked as attempting to put insulting dollar values on the lives of lost loved ones. Those who participated in the Fund were required to waive their right to sue the airlines involved in the attacks, as well as other potentially responsible entities including the Israeli airport security firm Huntleigh USA/ICTS. By taking the compensation, the families waived their right to demand a real investigation into 9/11.

 

More than 98 percent of the families accepted the money from the Feinberg-managed fund.  The amounts of the payments and the amounts paid to Diane Feinberg and the 30 lawyers are not known.  The American people deserve to know how the funds were used and who got paid.

 

Estimates put the total settlement amount at less than $3.5 billion total for all the victims. Due to the lack of oversight, it’s anyone’s guess where the rest of the tax dollars have gone. Ellen Mariani, a brave and fiery widow and 9/11 plaintiff, included Feinberg in her lawsuit which was eventually forcibly settled. Feinberg’s inclusion in the suit was partially related to his success in bribing Mariani’s attorney to try to coerce his client to accept the fund’s payout and attempt to convince her that she was clinically insane.

 

Feinberg’s role in covering up the truth about 9/11 is connected to his relationship to the state of Israel.  A year after the settlement of the 9/11 claims he went to Israel at the behest of the Sharon government to work on compensating the 8,000 settlers they were trying to force out of Gaza. Kenneth Feinberg wasn’t working pro bono on the 9/11 victims fund out of compassion for the victims of 9/11, or for America.  He was doing it to serve Israel and the murderous Mossad.

 

Diane ‘Dede’ Shaff Feinberg and the Jewish Agency

 

Diane and Kenneth Feinberg were co-chairmen of the recent General Assembly of the Jewish Federation, which hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, two prime suspects in the Israeli terrorism of 9/11.

 

Diane is also an executive member of the United Israel Appeal and the Jewish Federation of Washington.  She also happens to be a member of the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency – the parent organization of the Mossad.

 

To understand why American Jews are willing to commit and cover-up serious crimes, even treason, on behalf of the state of Israel one needs to understand that most religious Jews in America are first obliged to serve Israel – a foreign state.  American Jews are, for this reason, conflicted.  Their religion obliges them to make “aliya” and live in Israel but most would prefer to stay in the United States.  Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have chosen to leave “the Jewish state” and now live in the United States.  While they are unwilling to leave the comfort of the United States and immigrate to Israel (aliya), most religious Jews in the United States feel strongly compelled to support and defend the state of Israel.

 

To fulfill their obligation to the state of Israel, Zionist Jews in America have created hundreds of organizations to raise funds and support for the Zionist state in Palestine.  These organizations are consolidated under an umbrella organization called the Jewish Agency.  The Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization are two parts of the same Zionist enterprise that operates in the United States and around the world.  The Jewish Agency was the Zionist organization that became the state of Israel in 1948 when a Jewish state was established in Palestine.  The Jewish Agency, then headed by David Ben-Gurion, literally became the apparatus of the Zionist state and Ben-Gurion became the first prime minister of Israel.

 

The Jewish Agency, head quartered in New York City after World War II, organized and funded the Haganah, the Zionist militia in Palestine, as well as the terrorist groups known as the Irgun and LEHI (the Stern Gang).  Using these groups, the Jewish Agency created the Mossad Le Aliyah Bet (the Agency for Illegal Immigration) in 1938 to smuggle illegal Jewish immigrants and weapons into Palestine.  The Jewish Agency and the Mossad worked together to bring many thousands of Jews to Palestine – illegally – from Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, and Europe.  The Jewish Agency was the Mossad.

 

The Jewish Agency and the Mossad continued to work together after the creation of the state of Israel to bring Jews to the Zionist state.  The hardline Zionists who run Israel today are actually fighting a losing battle with demographics.  The Arab population around them is growing quickly while many Israelis are leaving the Jewish state.  The Israeli population has become more Russian, more extremist, and less Western in its outlook than at any time since the founding of the state in 1948.  Ariel Sharon, the now comatose prime minister who ran Israel in 2001, dreamed of bringing one million Jews to Israel from the United States.  In this effort he worked closely with the Jewish Agency.

 

 

 

 

Alvin K. Hellerstein: U.S. Judge but Zionist gatekeeper

 

Feinberg’s actions were crucial to removing more than 98 percent of the families from the litigation process.  Kenneth Feinberg and Judge Alvin Hellerstein have waged a war of attrition against the 9/11 relatives.  Of the thousands of families that could have used the courts to find justice and legal discovery for what happened on 9-11, Feinberg was successful in removing 98 percent.  Of the 96 families that chose to go to court, all but one or two cases have settled out of court after enduring years of obstruction in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein.  Thanks to Feinberg and Hellerstein there may never be a trial for a single victim of 9-11.

 

For the 96 families who initially chose to forgo the fund in favor of a transparent trial, Sheila Birnbaum was appointed special mediator between Hellerstein and the victims’ families. Birnbaum, another dedicated Zionist lawyer at the Israeli law firm Skadden Arps, effectively railroaded these brave families and forced them all to settle. Skadden Arps introduces itself with the following on its website:

 

Many of our attorneys are thoroughly familiar with the legal structure, business environment and political system of Israel, and several (including at the partner level) are Israeli-born, native Hebrew speakers who have been admitted to the bars of both Israel and New York. A number of our lawyers volunteer a significant amount of their time to Jewish and Israeli causes, including the America-Israel Friendship League, the Anti-Defamation League, the College of Management, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Elem, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Jerusalem Foundation and Miklat.”

 

Radical Zionist Alvin Hellerstein has controlled all 9/11 litigation. Hellerstein, Feinberg and Birnbaum were the triumvirate that formed the Zionist roadblock to any justice for the victims’ families. Hellerstein’s son, Joseph, worked for the law firm that represented ICTS, the Israeli passenger screening and security company implicated in 9/11. Hellerstein is thus guilty of a criminal conflict of interest in his prevention of a trial in any 9/11 lawsuit.

 

Alvin Hellerstein is tied to 9/11 directly in his role as head gatekeeper on all 9/11 claims, preventing legal discovery, wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits from trial. Judge Hellerstein is also intimately connected to other key Israeli players of the 9/11 massacre on multiple layers through his son, Joseph. Joseph Hellerstein worked for an Israeli law firm, Amit, Pollack and Matalon, which represented ICTS, the Israeli firm implicated in the attacks via passenger screening and airline security at Newark, Boston Logan, and Dulles, the departure sites of the hijacked aircraft.

 

ICTS is owned by two Israelis, Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon. Atzmon was convicted in Israel of fraud with partner and mayor of Jerusalem, Ehud Olmert.  Olmert later became prime minister of Israel. Olmert incidentally also made a secret trip to meet with then mayor of NYC, Rudy Giuliani on the eve of 9/11, ostensibly to oversee their plot.  He and other Israeli officials were allowed to leave the US aboard an El Al plane when all other planes were grounded on 9/11.  ICTS was also implicated in the 7/7 bombings in London.

 

Hellerstein recently effectively blocked the last victim’s family, the Bavises, from ever having a day of trial against the government and airport security, forcing them to settle out of court after a decade of his dedicated gatekeeping. His callous quote to the 96 families of victims of 9/11 will live in infamy:

 

We have to get past 9/11. Let it go. Life is beautiful. Life is short. Live out your years. Take the award.

 

Both father and son Hellerstein also worked for Stroock, Stroock, and Lavan, a Rothschild funded law firm which, incidentally, represented Larry Silverstein in his bid to lease the towers.  How many conflicts of interests can you count?

 

The Origins of “September Clues”

 

Around the beginning of June 2007, a new video – called “September Clues” appeared. It presented an analysis of the events as they were shown on TV on 9/11/2001. It tried to present the evidence that some of the images we were shown of the events could not have been real. The person who had produced/edited this video used the pseudonym “Social Service” and he seemed to be associated with a band of the same name.

 

Over the next few months “Social Service” released several updates to September clues and it finally ended up as 8 ten-minute segments and a couple of additional “epilogue” videos. Around this time, it was revealed that Social Service’s name was “Simon Shack”.

 

In July or August 2008, on a forum, Simon Shack made a request for some web storage space for his videos. A man called Andrew Johnson offered some of the space to Simon Shack to store his video files etc., and also purchased a domain name for Simon Shack www.septclues.com. A year later when the subscription to that web space expired, Johnson and Shack began to have a series of increasingly serious disagreements, with the bulk of the animosity emanating from the Shack side.

 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Who precisely is Simon Shack?

 

As it turns out, Simon Shack is actually a Pseudonym. Simon Shack’s real name is Simon Hytten, which he disclosed on his forum in March 2011. Simon gave this explanation for his adoption of the Shack pseudonym:

 

My surname Shack was coined back in 1993 or so by a black, Colorado-born jazz musician named Fontaine Burnette. Try and contact him and ask him about it (I haven’t heard from him in many years). He asked me what Hytten meant – so I told him it means a little house/or hut. So he just quipped… “Like a shack?” – and I said yeah, a bit like a shack. That’s all there is to it. I liked it. So then, as I registered at the STIM (the Swedish Musician’s Union) I was told that my artist name would be accepted – even at legal/bureaucratic levels. So that’s how I signed in at STIM. Ever since, I have used this surname – and all music reviews/articles written about me/my band (The Social Service) as a musician, have had me as Simon Shack. It simply stuck on me – and most people now know me by that name. I certainly had no motive to change my surname back in 1993 – in order to hide from something! At the time, I had no clue whatsoever of how this crazy world is rolling!

 

Early years in Sicily – disrupting Danilo Dolci’s anti-Mafia crusade

 

Simon Hytten was born in Stockholm, Sweden from a Norwegian father and a Swedish mother. Simon grew up in Sicily with two brothers and his parents who were part of a ‘workshop’ run by Danilo Dolci in a small town near Palermo called Partinico.

 

Danilo Dolci was an anti-mafia crusader and it appears that Simon’s father, Eyvind Hytten was sent to infiltrate and disrupt Dolci’s work. In 1967, Dolci held a press conference where he accused prominent members of the government, by name, of collusion with the Mafia. Sometime after this, Eyvind Hytten split from Dolci and planned to establish an institute in Palermo to train development workers. Hytten was quoted as saying:

 

We did not want to be instruments for maintaining Dolci’s fame. We wanted his fame to be an instrument for our work for Sicilians. I think that we, more than Dolci, now represent the possibility of doing something for Sicily.

 

However, the motives for Hytten’s work were questioned by the Swedish committee who had originally sponsored his work with Dolci; they stated in a press release:

 

We deplore the manner in which Hytten has publicly taken a stand against Dolci. We will in no way participate in Hytten’s plans, but will continue to support Danilo Dolci in his tireless campaign to release Sicily from the grip of poverty and a powerful Mafia.

 

The Swedish group also announced it was fully washing it hands of Hytten and sharply criticized the newspapers who had given the false impression that Hytten had become Dolci’s legitimate successor in Sicily. Sadly, Hytten’s nefarious work had its desired effect, as noted on Dolci’s Wikipedia page:

 

The smears certainly succeeded in pushing Dolci out of the limelight in Italy – for the last 20 years of his life he disappeared from public view.”

 

So it appears that Eyvind Hytten was controlled opposition sent in to disrupt and destroy Dolci’s anti-mafia organization, sadly he succeeded. Simon Hytten tried to shift the blame onto American writer Jerre Mangione, author of the book ‘The World around Danilo Dolci’

 

So what exactly do you think this former Syracuse graduate/Time Magazine/Department Of Justice employee was doing in Sicily interviewing a groundbreaking, upcoming yet “inconvenient”(for the world elite) anti-mafia activist like Danilo Dolci? Was he not there perhaps – just perhaps – to give a bad name to the whole community, and to point out/inflate the workshop’s inevitable, petty squabbles? To be sure, this is what transpires when you scour the chapters of his book

 

Geneva and the Bin Ladins

 

Bin Laden stickers on race car

 

Here is an audio clip in which Simon admits that he put the Bin Ladin stickers on the car:

 

 

 

 

After their work was done in Sicily, the family moved to Geneva, Switzerland where Eyvind took up employment with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

 

During this time in Geneva, Simon’s elder brother Mario began a career as a racing driver, he competed for 3 seasons 1982-84 in the Marlboro British Formula 3 Championship before competing in the FIA Formula 3000 Int. Championship for four seasons 1985-88. Mario didn’t have much success, winning only one race and claiming eight podium positions from over 70 starts. He had a handful of races in sports car formulae 1989-92 before retiring in 1993. Nowadays, he lives in Sweden and works as a manager and translator.

During his career, Mario was sponsored by the “Bin Ladin Group.” Apparently, Mario befriended Yeslam Bin Ladin, an entrepreneur and half-brother of Osama Bin Laden. Yeslam is a fully Westernized man, possesses a degree in Economics, speaks four languages fluently, owns several successful businesses and became a naturalized Swiss citizen in 2001.

Yeslam became interested in helping Mario in early 1986. As he was quite influential in Arab elite, the brother of Osama managed to recruit a number of sponsors of the Middle East to support Mario in Formula 3000. The main sponsor was Yeslam’s family company, the Bin Ladin Group and this can be seen from photos of Mario’s F3000 car where the Bin Ladin Group is advertised on the rear wing.

Simon tried to explain this connection on his forum:

I must say that Mario did well for himself in finding wealthy sponsors to forward his car racing career. He was a relentless sponsorship hunter and, at some stage, got to meet Yeslam Bin Ladin in his London office. Yeslam gave him some cash to promote his construction company

 

Regardless of the truth of the actual relationship, it is clear that Simon Shack aka Simon Hytten, was, for at least a few years in the 1980s, one person removed from the Bin Ladin family.

 

Apparently, there is little love lost today between Simon and his two elder brothers, as Simon wrote in an internet post:

 

[A] few lines about my estranged brothers, Nicolai and Mario. They have inexplicably grown into two abject human beings – and I have almost no words to qualify their current behavior.”

Simon describes Nicolai and Mario as ‘two despicable creatures’ and states that “my disdain for them is immense.

Deconstructing the Clues Forum “9/11 Mythology”

“September Clues” has

 




The NSA, the Middle East, Bush’s anti-American legacy

The_NSA_MiddleEast_Bush_AntiAmerican_Legacy

By Kevin Barrett and  Jim Fetzer

“The Dynamic Duo Weekly News” is produced by NO LIES RADIO every Thursday at 8 AM/PT (10 AM/CT, 11 AM/ET) and all the past shows are archived here.

(6a) Our new year of surveillance

Kevin hosts “Truth Jihad Radio” as well as co-hosting “Dynamic Duo Weekly News”, so it is not surprising that he might occasionally lose track. 

The hype about Robert Gates’ forthcoming book as containing “explosive information” about Barack Obama and his administration appears to be grossly exaggerated.

He even describes Obama’s decision to raid the compound in Pakistan in pursuit of a man who died on 15 December 2001 as “one of the most courageous ever made by a White House”, which is simply more propaganda to bolster another example of big lies to the American public to promote a political agenda.

But the State of Connecticut, shamefully, appears to be doing its best to compete, where a group of scholars (including three Ph.D.s) has exposed the Sandy Hook hoax more thoroughly and in greater detail than ever before.  Their “Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax” deserves to be widely read.

A federal judge in New York has approved that state’s ban on assault weapons even as he rejected the ban on clips holding more than seven rounds, where these gun control measures appear to many Americans to be un-Constitutional on their face. It remains to be seen what the reaction of public will be to the dawning realization that they are being promoted on the basis of what now appears to be a fabricated event at Sandy Hook during which no one died.

The former Detroit Chief of Police has even come around to endorse the right of Americans to Indeed, the legacy of anti-Americanism that Americans have inherited from the deceit and deception of the Bush/Cheney administration on the basis of the false-flag attack of 9/11, which was blamed on Arab fanatics but appears to have been carried out by neo-cons in the Department of Defense and their allies in the Mossad, has done enormous not only to those lost in combat and to the national treasury but, as in the past, the US has done immense damage to the countries we have unjustly invaded.

Click on link below to read full article:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/09/the-nsa-the-middle-east-bushs-anti-american-legacy-the-real-weekly-news/

 




Obama lies, Syrians die: What’s wrong with this picture?

by Jim Fetzer (with George Washington and Dave Hodges)

“Without doubt, intelligence is being manipulated to justify war against Syria. Here, here, here, here and here.”–George Washington

Obama and the Zionist hoards, including Sens. Charles Schumer and Diane Feinstein, are going “all out” to promote the interests of Israel over those of the United States.

Obama is going to make six appearances on television on Monday to further demonstrate his total willingness to betray the Constitution and the American people for his puppet masters.

The situation has never been more clear: It is AIPAC, Israel and the traitors in our midst against the United States of America. If they lose this, then Zionism is dead–and the sooner, the better. No more wars for Israel!

On the Sunday talk shows, “Face the Nation” and “Meet the Press”, I watch as Obama’s Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough, abused his position to lie repeatedly to the American people. He asserted that the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government was undisputed–when in fact Assad, Putin, and even members of the United States Congress, among them Alan Grayson, have disputed it.

He asserted that international norms will not be maintained and that Iran and North Korea would be encouraged to violate them, if there were no military response from the United States–even though a military response from the United States absent an imminent threat or approval by the Security Counsel of the United Nations would be a blatant violation of international law.

He asserted that the failure of the United States to follow through on a Presidential declaration would weaken respect for the nation in the world community–as though taking an action in violation to international law in retaliation for a false allegation of a violation of international norms would strengthen the standing of the United States in the world community!

A refreshing stance was taken by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who has been weighing the prospects for a filibuster against the resolution to authorize the bombing.  During his appearance today, he said, he would demand that any vote taken by Congress be binding, meaning that the president would be barred from striking Syria without congressional approval.

“The president cannot, if we vote him down, decide to go to war anyway. That’s the way I interpret the Constitution,” Paul said on “Fox News Sunday”, where a similar opinion was advanced by David Alexrod, who had been Obama’s campaign adviser.  When asked if Obama could go forward without Congressional approval, he said it was most unlikely

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Even Bob Schaeffer, the usually sensible host of “Face the Nation”,  concluded with the observation, “In a dangerous world, when the United States takes a stand and then goes back on its word, we are left in an even more dangerous place.” But he, like Obama, Kerry and McDonough, have been lying to the world as well as to the American people to promote the political agenda of Israel, as military and intelligence experts have confirmed as follows.

High-Level U.S. Intelligence Officers: Syrian Government Didn’t Launch Chemical Weapons

 

by George Washington

Without doubt, intelligence is being manipulated to justify war against Syria.  Here, here, here, here and here.

Without doubt, the Syrian rebels had access to chemical weapons … and have apparently used them in the recent past. Associated Press reported last week: 

An intercept of Syrian military officials discussing the strike was among low-level staff, with no direct evidence tying the attack back to an Assad insider or even a senior Syrian commander, the officials said.

So while Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that links between the attack and the Assad government are “undeniable,” U.S. intelligence officials are not so certain that the suspected chemical attack was carried out on Assad’s orders, or even completely sure it wascarried out by government forces, the officials said.

***

Another possibility that officials would hope to rule out: that stocks had fallen out of the government’s control and were deployed by rebels in a callous and calculated attempt to draw the West into the war.

Reuters notes today:

With the United States threatening to attack Syria, U.S. and allied intelligence services are still trying to work out who ordered the poison gas attack on rebel-held neighborhoods near Damascus.

No direct link to President Bashar al-Assad or his inner circle has been publicly demonstrated, and some U.S. sources say intelligence experts are not sure whether the Syrian leader knew of the attack before it was launched or was only informed about it afterward.

Indeed, numerous intelligence officers say that the rebels likely carried out the August 21st attack.

For example, the Daily Caller reports:

The Obama administration has selectively used intelligence to justify military strikes on Syria, former military officers with access to the original intelligence reports say, in a manner that goes far beyond what critics charged the Bush administration of doing in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.

According to these officers, who served in top positions in the United States, Britain, France, Israel, and Jordan, a Syrian military communication intercepted by Israel’s famed Unit 8200 electronic intelligence outfit has been doctored so that it leads a reader to just the opposite conclusion reached by the original report.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

The doctored report was picked up on Israel’s Channel 2 TV  on Aug. 24, then by Focus magazine in Germany, the Times of Israel, and eventually by The Cable  in Washington, DC.

According to the doctored report, the chemical attack was carried out by the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division of the Syrian Army, an elite unit commanded by Maher al-Assad, the president’s brother.

However, the original communication intercepted by Unit 8200 between a major in command of the rocket troops assigned to the 155th Brigade of the 4th Armored Division, and the general staff, shows just the opposite.

The general staff officer asked the major if he was responsible for the chemical weapons attack. From the tone of the conversation, it was clear that “the Syrian general staff were out of their minds with panic that an unauthorized strike had been launched by the 155th Brigade in express defiance of their instructions,” the former officers say.

According to the transcript of the original Unit 8200 report, the major“hotly denied firing any of his missiles” and invited the general staff to come and verify that all his weapons were present.

The report contains a note at the end that the major was interrogated by Syrian intelligence for three days, then returned to command of his unit. “All of his weapons were accounted for,” the report stated.

***

An Egyptian intelligence report describes a meeting in Turkey between military intelligence officials from Turkey and Qatar and Syrian rebels. One of the participants states, “there will be a game changing event on August 21st” that will “bring the U.S. into a bombing campaign” against the Syrian regime.

The chemical weapons strike on Moudhamiya, an area under rebel control, took place on August 21. “Egyptian military intelligence insists it was a combined Turkish/Qatar/rebel  false flag operation,” said a source familiar with the report.

[A “false flag” is a ploy for starting war which has been used by governments around the world for thousands of years.]

Agents provacateurs are as old as warfare itself. What better than a false flag attack, staged by al Qaeda and its al Nusra front allies in Syria, to drag the United States into a war?

YouTube – Veterans Today –

And 12 very high-level former intelligence officials wrote the following memorandum to Obama today:

We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the opportunity for what is commonly known as “plausible denial.”

***  http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2013-09-07/high-level-us-intelligence-officers-syrian-government-didn’t-launch-chemical-

There is a growing body of evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its supporters — providing a strong circumstantial case that the August 21 chemical incident was a pre-planned provocation by the Syrian opposition and its Saudi and Turkish supporters. The aim is reported to have been to create the kind of incident that would bring the United States into the war.

According to some reports, canisters containing chemical agent were brought into a suburb of Damascus, where they were then opened. Some people in the immediate vicinity died; others were injured.

We are unaware of any reliable evidence that a Syrian military rocket capable of carrying a chemical agent was fired into the area. In fact, we are aware of no reliable physical evidence to support the claim that this was a result of a strike by a Syrian military unit with expertise in chemical weapons.

In addition, we have learned that on August 13-14, 2013, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major, irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and Qatari, Turkish and U.S. intelligence officials took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, now used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors.

Senior opposition commanders who came from Istanbul pre-briefed the regional commanders on an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development,” which, in turn, would lead to a U.S.-led bombing of Syria.

At operations coordinating meetings at Antakya, attended by senior Turkish, Qatari and U.S. intelligence officials as well as senior commanders of the Syrian opposition, the Syrians were told that the bombing would start in a few days. Opposition leaders were ordered to prepare their forces quickly to exploit the U.S. bombing, march into Damascus, and remove the Bashar al-Assad government.

The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive. And they were. A weapons distribution operation unprecedented in scope began in all opposition camps on August 21-23. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. intelligence officers.

 

al-qaeda-funding-300x200Who Has Crossed the Red Line?

 

by  Dave Hodges

 

Obama has called  the chemical weapons attack last month in Damascus a case of crossing the “Red Line,”  which means that Obama assumes the moral right to attack Syria. In actuality, it is Obama who has crossed the “Red Line.”

Which Side of the Red Line Are You On, Mr. President?

There is an old saying which reminds us that when we are pointing our finger at somebody, we have three fingers pointing back at us. In the case of Barak Hussein Obama and the Syrian crisis, this appears to be the case.

Obama has failed to convince the UN Security Council on the chain of custody for the chemical weapons attack in Damascus last month and yet, he is still attempting to attack Syria. No international consensus by this President but he still desires to kill tens of thousands of innocent Syrians. Who is crossing the “Red Line” now?

Your tax dollars at work.

Obama and the CIA backed al-Qaeda, the terrorists who, if we are to believe the official government stories, killed 3,000 Americans in the 9/11 attacks. Yet, Obama supported al-Qaeda in the   in the overthrow and murder of Gaddafi for failing to capitulate in bowing down to the Bank of International Settlements and becoming a debt ridden nation like most of the rest of the world. Who crossed the “Red line” in Libya, Mr. President?

If the CIA will do this to them, won’t they do this to us, Mr. President?

More than 100,000 Syrian people have been killed, with nearly 7 million people uprooted from their homes. U.N. officialsestimate that 5 million have been displaced inside the country while another 2 million have fled to neighboring countries. The total carnage amounts to nearly a third of Syria’s population, which was 23 million before the fighting began. At the heart of this two-year-old revolution is the CIA backed al-Qaeda. Without CIA backing for al-Qaeda, there would be no revolution and all the aforementioned people would still be alive today. Who crossed the Red Line here, Mr. President?

Mr. President, your CIA backed al-Qaeda rebels murder Christians and purposely shell Christian villages in such places as the countryside outside of Aleppo. Who’s crossing the Red Line now, Mr. President?

Mr. President you are having your lackeys dust off the old reasons to justify the war in Iraq and applying these same excuses to Syria.  Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, March 23, 2003 on the eve of the Iraq war, before the House Appropriations Committee stated that ”The oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years… we are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon.” Now John Kerry is making the same exact claims about Syria. Wolfowitz’s war that was going to be financed with Arab assets cost the US taxpayer more than one trillion dollars. Obama stooge, James Carville, recently said that Bush was to blame for what is happening in Syria. If Bush is that despicable in the eyes of the Democrats, then why are Obama and Kerry dusting off Bush’s old and untrue excuses to justify war in Syria, a war that will be financed by Arab resources? In light of the fact that your people are trying to lie the American people into war under false economic pretenses, Mr. President, who is crossing the “Red Line?”

petrodollar-scamMr. President, anyone with an IQ over room temperature knows that attacking Syria and then Iran is all about preserving the Petrodollar. The coming war has nothing to do with chemical weapons. It has to do with oil.

Amazingly, Mr. President, you have help in the mainstream media regarding the role that the preservation of the Petrodollar is providing for your apparent motivation to attack Iran who is selling its oil for gold instead of the American dollar (i. e. the Petrodollar).

Mr. President, you think you may have pulled off a clever ruse in order to justify your action against Syria along with mainstream media complicity of silence over the Petrodollar issue. I find that incredible since I have written about this since last fall and you can access the proof in the following article. I have over a dozen articles to choose from on my website, alone.

In light of the fact that these issues have been in the discussion for 9 months, and you continue to ignore the central role that the Petrodollar is playing in this conflict, who has crossed the “Red Line” now, Mr. President?

Mr. President, your lackey, John McCain, stated that if Congress votes no on a resolution calling for U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war, the resulting fallout would be “catastrophic” for America’s credibility in the world. Mr. President, are you saying, through John McCain, that you are willing to kill tens of thousands of innocent Syrian people to defend your pride? Mr. President, who has crossed the “Red Line,” now?

Mr. President, you make much of the fact that chemical weapons were used in Damascus. However, you have failed to prove that Assad is responsible. The presence of chemical weapons does not implicate anyone without direct proof which your people cannot offer. Who from the United States was responsible for the chain of custody of the laboratory analysis which would implicate Assad? Where was the laboratory analysis conducted? What independent party oversaw the analysis?

Since the NSA can spy on anyone at anytime, why did your people not discover the intention of Assad’s people to use chemical weapons, in advance, and go public at that time in order to prevent loss of life through exposure? Why should we take the word of your personal spokesman, former “I got caught by Jerome Corsi lying about my role as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam,” John Kerry?

syrian-children-murdered-by-sarin-gas-300x225Mr. President, Assad would have known that using chemical weapons would have invited your intervention. His forces were holding off the rebels that your administration has funded through the CIA as funneled to al-Qaeda. The rebel forces (al-CIAeda) could not hold out hope for victory without US intervention because a stalemate had been obtained and this chemical weapons false flag event perpetrated by the CIA, and the invocation of the use by the US military is the only way that balance of power could be tipped in favor of your CIA? This is a war crime, Mr. Obama. Mr. President, who has crossed the “Red Line” here?

The Real Red Line

Mr. President, isn’t it true that Valerie Jarrett, your Chief of Staff, was dismissed by Mayor Daley for her role as one of the biggest slum lord queens in Chicago history? Didn’t Jarrett’s extended family marry into the communist Weather Underground Ayers family? That would be the notorious Ayers family connected the Weathermen Underground! Who crossed the proverbial “Red Line” here, Mr. President?

Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/08/obama-lies-syrians-die-whats-wrong-with-this-picture/

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Founder
Recall Your Congress and Senate
http://www.recallpetitions.com

 




Are we Going To War with Syria over a Natural Gas Pipeline?

By Michael Snyder (with Jim Fetzer)

“WMR has learned from multiple intelligence sources in Washington, London, Beirut, and Paris, that Saudi intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan has paid off key members of the U.S. Senate and House leadership, as well as key ministers of the French government, with “incentive cash” to support an American and French “shock and awe” military strike on not only Syria but Hezbollah positions in Lebanon“–Wayne Madsen

obama-jokerAs Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) has now publicly proclaimed, the Obama/Biden administration has been manipulating intelligence to justify an attack on Syria.

Vladimir Putin has taken the extraordinary step of asserting that Secretary of State John Kerry “has been lying” about the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Russia and China are increasing their military presence in the immediate vicinity and we appear to be on the verge of WWIII.

And members of Congress who have seen the “classified information” say it doesn’t prove anything, where the “rush to war” based on skewed intelligence is very similar to Iraq.

Wayne Madsen, moveover, has learned from multiple intelligence sources in Washington, London, Beirut, and Paris, that Saudi intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan has paid off key members of the U.S. Senate and House leadership, as well as key ministers of the French government, with “incentive cash” to support an American and French “shock and awe” military strike on not only Syria but Hezbollah positions in Lebanon:

Republican and Democratic members of the Senate and House leadership, including Senators Harry Reid, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Barbara Boxer, and Robert Menendez, as well as House Speaker John Boehner, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers, New York’s Peter King, Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, and others have seen their campaign chests grow substantially as a result of Bandar’s financial largesse, according to our multiple sources.

If you ask why in the world Saudi Arabia would be so profoundly involved in promoting a war in Syria that it would bribe some of our nation’s highest officials, the answer may be that it wants to insure that a pipeline that would compete with its own preferred alternative which would pass through Syria is never built. If Michael Snyder has it right–and he appears to have “nailed it”–then all this rubbish about “international law” and the necessity to punish Assad for the use of chemical weapons is nothing but political theater.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Obama and Kerry have been lying to the American people. The case against the Syria government is completely contrived. It appears that Prince Bandar provided the rebels with these weapons but no instructions about how to use them–and that the rebels were clumsy and gassed themselves. Syria has had the rebels on the run and a UN inspection team was about to arrive! We are being told nothing but one lie after another:

 

 

Everything that Kerry has said about knowing where they were fired from, knowing where they landed, and knowing who was responsible is rubbish, where the United States has become an international joke. Syria and Iran are the final stages in the Israeli plan to dismantle the modern Arab states (and then strike Persian Iran), but this may explain why Saudi Arabia has been playing a crucial role behind the scenes.

Is the United States going to War with Syria over a Natural Gas Pipeline?

 

by Michael Snyder

Pipeline-300x300Why has the little nation of Qatar spent 3 billion dollars to support the rebels in Syria?  Could it be because Qatar is the largest exporter of liquid natural gas in the world and Assad won’t let them build a natural gas pipeline through Syria?  Of course. Qatar wants to install a puppet regime in Syria that will allow them to build a pipeline which will enable them to sell lots and lots of natural gas to Europe.

Why is Saudi Arabia spending huge amounts of money to help the rebels and why has Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan been “jetting from covert command centers near the Syrian front lines to the Élysée Palace in Paris and the Kremlin in Moscow, seeking to undermine the Assad regime”?  Well, it turns out that Saudi Arabia intends to install their own puppet government in Syria which will allow the Saudis to control the flow of energy through the region.

On the other side, Russia very much prefers the Assad regime for a whole bunch of reasons.  One of those reasons is that Assad is helping to block the flow of natural gas out of the Persian Gulf into Europe, thus ensuring higher profits for Gazprom.  Now the United States is getting directly involved in the conflict.

If the U.S. is successful in getting rid of the Assad regime, it will be good for either the Saudis or Qatar (and possibly for both), and it will be really bad for Russia.  This is a strategic geopolitical conflict about natural resources, religion and money, and it really has nothing to do with chemical weapons at all.

Common Knowledge

It has been common knowledge that Qatar has desperately wanted to construct a natural gas pipeline that will enable it to get natural gas to Europe for a very long time.  The following is an excerpt from an article from 2009.

Qatar has proposed a gas pipeline from the Gulf to Turkey in a sign the emirate is considering a further expansion of exports from the world’s biggest gasfield after it finishes an ambitious program to more than double its capacity to produce liquefied natural gas (LNG).

YouTube – Veterans Today –

“We are eager to have a gas pipeline from Qatar to Turkey,” Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, the ruler of Qatar, said last week, following talks with the Turkish president Abdullah Gul and the prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in the western Turkish resort town of Bodrum. “We discussed this matter in the framework of co-operation in the field of energy. In this regard, a working group will be set up that will come up with concrete results in the shortest possible time,” he said, according to Turkey’s Anatolia news agency.

The Nabucco Pipeline

Other reports in the Turkish press said the two states were exploring the possibility of Qatar supplying gas to the strategic Nabucco pipeline project, which would transport Central Asian and Middle Eastern gas to Europe, bypassing Russia. A Qatar-to-Turkey pipeline might hook up with Nabucco at its proposed starting point in eastern Turkey. Last month, Mr Erdogan and the prime ministers of four European countries signed a transit agreement for Nabucco, clearing the way for a final investment decision next year on the EU-backed project to reduce European dependence on Russian gas.

“For this aim, I think a gas pipeline between Turkey and Qatar would solve the issue once and for all,” Mr Erdogan added, according to reports in several newspapers. The reports said two different routes for such a pipeline were possible. One would lead from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq to Turkey. The other would go through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey. It was not clear whether the second option would be connected to the Pan-Arab pipeline, carrying Egyptian gas through Jordan to Syria. That pipeline, which is due to be extended to Turkey, has also been proposed as a source of gas for Nabucco.

Click on link below to read full report and watch video:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/07/are-we-going-to-war-with-syria-over-a-natural-gas-pipeline/

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Founder
Recall Your Congress and Senate
http://www.recallpetitions.com




Russia Equipped Syria with Most Advanced Anti-Ship Missile Systems

By Michael Snyder

“If the U.S. Navy is not very careful to stay out of range, we could easily see footage of destroyed U.S. naval vessels sinking into the Mediterranean Sea on the evening news.”–Michael Snyder

P-800-Yakhont-300x176Russia has sold Syria highly advanced rocket launchers, anti-aircraft missiles and anti-ship missiles.  In fact, the P-800 Yakhont anti-ship missiles that Russia has equipped Syria with are the most advanced anti-ship missiles that Russia has.

When the United States strikes Syria, they might be quite surprised at how hard Syria can hit back.  The Syrian military is the most formidable adversary that the U.S. military has tangled with in the Middle East by far.

From Syria, P-800 Yakhont anti-ship missiles can cover much of the eastern Mediterranean and can even reach air bases in Cyprus.  If the U.S. Navy is not very careful to stay out of range, we could easily see footage of destroyed U.S. naval vessels sinking into the Mediterranean Sea on the evening news.  And once the American people see such footage, it will be impossible to stop a full-blown war between the United States and Syria.

Syria has highly advanced weapons systems that Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya did not have.  Anyone that thinks that we can just sit back and lob cruise missiles at them is being naive.  Syria has weapons that “have never before been seen” in the Middle East.  The following is from a recent article by Mac Slavo:

According to the report from Syrian-based Dam Press and the Dyar Newspaper, the Russians aren’t backing off their Syria policy and they are getting ready to double down by supplying Assad’s military with weapons the have never before been seen in the middle east.

If and when Western forces engage the Syrian army you can be assured that it will be nothing like the 1991 conflict in Iraq when a hundred thousand of Saddam Hussein’s soldiers surrendered without firing a shot. Nor will it be a no-fly zone free-for-all where air forces will be able to target military assets as they did in Libya without being challenged.

No, this time will be different.

Posted below are some excerpts from a translation of the article from Syrian-based Dam Press that Mac Slavo mentioned:

The Patriot Missiles will be hit and repealed withS300 SAM [already installed in Syria]. Putin also threatened to deliver the more advanced S400 anti-aircraft missiles

He added that Russia will also supply Syria with state-of-the-art 24-Barrell rocket launchers which have a range of 60 km ranked as the most developed artillery weapon of its kind.

Putin clearly stated that the Middle East is going to witness a significant change.  Syria will be armed with weapons that have never been seen before [in the Middle East] including computer guided smart missiles that never miss their target.

He also added that Russia will supply Syria with Skean 5 ground-to-sea missiles that are capable of hitting and sinking any target up to 250 km off the Syrian coast.

The weapons systems mentioned in that article are very powerful.  For instance, the video posted below contains footage of the rocket launchers mentioned in the article:

 

Click on link below to read full report and watch videos:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/03/russia-has-equipped-syria-with-its-most-advanced-missile-systems/

Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower-Activist
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Columnist Veterans Today
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/
Stew Webb working 24/7 for you
Donations always welcome
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Founder
Recall Your Congress and Senate
http://www.recallpetitions.com

 




Passing Gas in Syria and Endless Israeli “False Flag” Attacks

by Jim Fetzer

“I am comfortable that Assad deployed a nerve agent in East Damascus.”Michael Shrimpton, Veterans Today

Michael Shrimpton

In my opinion, no serious analyst of affairs in the Middle East takes the claim that the Assad government has used chemical weapons in Syria as accurate and true–which means that at least one of my colleagues here at Veterans Today is not a serious analyst of Middle East affairs.  The very idea that the government of Syria would launch a nerve agent attack as a UN inspection team is about to arrive to investigate previous gas attacks is politically absurd.

That is on a level with the bombing in Bulgaria that killed five Israeli tourists and was blamed on a Canadian to provide pseudo-justification for passing extreme “anti-terrorism” legislation by Canada’s neo-con government, which appears to be playing “catch up” in its efforts to compete with its own version of the PATRIOT Act.  These are obvious “false flag” attacks.

Both are examples of the kind of blatant propaganda brought to us by Israel in the past, including the attack on the King David Hotel in Palestine in 1946 by Irgun terrorists dressed as Arabs, the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, and the bombing of its own Embassy in Argentina in 1992 and–when too few Jews were killed–of its own Jewish Community Center in 1994.

Israel’s involvement in the atrocities of 9/11 has been copiously documented–right down to the painting of the Twin Towers being hit by aircraft on the side of a truck from Urban Moving Systems, which was used to bring the “Dancing Israels” from Liberty State Park, where they had been filming the demolition of the World Trade Center and celebrating in Arab clothing. This is only the latest in a long line of fabricated events in the tradition of the Mossad’s motto, “Make War by Deception”.

Click on link below to watch video and read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/25/passing-gas-in-syria-and-endless-israeli-false-flag-attacks/

http://www.stewwebb.com/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/
http://www.stewwebb.com/stew-webb-radio-interviews/
http://www.youtube/stewwebb1




Worse than Chernobyl: The inner threat of Fukushima crisis

Worse than Chernobyl: The inner threat of Fukushima crisis

by Christopher Busby

There is a curious and bizarre reversal of the natural at Fukushima: a looking-glass world inversion. Unlike the standard marine catastrophe, for example the Titanic, where the need is to manically pump water out of the ship to stop it sinking, at Fukushima the game is to madly pump water in, in order to stop it melting down and exploding.

Probably because it is now clear that the saturation of the ground from all the pumping water for cooling the several reactors and spent fuel pools has destabilized the foundations of the buildings, TEPCO is bringing forward its operation to try and deal with what is perhaps the most dangerous of the four sites, the spent fuel pond of Reactor 4. For this pond contains a truly enormous amount of radioactive material: 1,331 spent fuel grids amounting to 228.3 tons of Uranium and Plutonium buried inside a swimming pool which has already dried out once and exploded. That explosion blasted a significant, but unknown, quantity of lethally radioactive bits and pieces of fuel element around the site (where I heard they were bulldozed into the ground – who knows?), but it also blew the top off the building, covered the fuel elements under the water with rubble and pieces of crane machinery, and no doubt twisted and melted a large proportion of the remaining spent fuel.

Workers wearing protective suits and masks are seen near tanks of radiation contaminated water at Tokyo Electric Power Company's (TEPCO) tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (Reuters / Issei Kato) 

Workers wearing protective suits and masks are seen near tanks of radiation contaminated water at Tokyo Electric Power Company’s (TEPCO) tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (Reuters / Issei Kato)

The operation involves the kind of game that we are all familiar with in those machines in penny arcades. You know the ones. You stick in some coins. You have levers which manipulate a claw which you position over a teddy bear or a doll and then you let this down, pick the item up and drop it down a chute to win it. In the TEPCO version of this game, you build a crane over the spent fuel tank (or what’s left of it) and manoeuver a grab down into the rubble to deftly pick out a spent fuel assembly, like a 4.5meter long and 24cm square birdcage containing the zirconium metal clad fuel elements, each unit weighing about one third of a ton.

Of course, to make the game more interesting, they are not just sitting there like they were when the tank was being used. They are under water (sea water), covered in debris, corroded, busted, twisted, intertwined and generally impossible to deal with. And here is the really scary thing: if you manage to bust a fuel element, the best outcome is that huge amounts of radioactivity escape into the air and blow over Japan, just like before. The worst outcome is when two of these things get too close, perhaps because in pulling one out it breaks and falls against another one in the tank.  Because then you suddenly have lots of fission, a lot of heat, a meltdown, possibly a big blast like before, and the destruction of the entire cooling pond. Or else the water boils off and the whole thing catches fire.

This photo taken on August 6, 2013 shows local government officials and nuclear experts inspecting a monitoring well where high levels of radioactive materials were detected at Tokyo Electric Power's (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant (Japan out AFP Photo / Japan Pool via JIJI Press)  

This photo taken on August 6, 2013 shows local government officials and nuclear experts inspecting a monitoring well where high levels of radioactive materials were detected at Tokyo Electric Power’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant (Japan out AFP Photo / Japan Pool via JIJI Press)

Then what happens? Not quite Armageddon, but as far as Japan is concerned, almost. I bet they have contingency plans to evacuate the northern island to Korea, China, anywhere. A lot of this radiation will end up in the USA, a long way downwind, admittedly, but then there is an awful lot of radioactivity involved.

Another tank with highly radioactive water at the devastated Fukushima nuclear power plant has leaked, operator TEPCO reported on Tuesday. The contaminated water contains an unprecedented 80 million Becquerels of radiation per liter. The norm is a mere 150 Bq.

Let me lead you through what the spent fuel pond of Reactor 4 contains in the way of radionuclides. I was taken to task after my last article for not listing enough of the radionuclide contaminants. So for the record, though some may find it boring, let me remedy that. It is an impressive list of lethal material:

Strontium-89, Strontium-90, Yttrium-90, Zirconium-95, Niobium-95, Ruthenium-106, Rhodium-106, Antimony-125, Iodine-131, Xenon-133, Caesium-137, Caesium-134, Cerium-144 (loads of this), Protoactinium-147, Europium-154, Plutonium-238, 239, 240, 241, Americium (Yes)-241 and 243, Curium-242,243,244, and of course Uranium 238,235 and 234.

These are the main ones. There are a lot more, and decay daughters of these also. It is a scary amount of invisible death. The total quantity of all these in the spent fuel pool of reactor 4 is about 1021 Becquerels, if we leave out the noble gases and iodines maybe 1020 (that is, 1 with 20 zeroes). Maybe 50 to 100 Chernobyl accidents worth, or more depending on what you believe came out of Chernobyl.

I list these because it should be made quite clear that the concentration of the media on the radio-caesiums and plutoniums and iodines is a very partial story. More discourse manipulation.

What lies within

Which brings me to another aspect of this grim piece of contemporary history. My expertise is in the health effects of internal radionuclides: what happens when these substances I list above get into human beings. Just after the Fukushima catastrophe I made a calculation and a prediction based on the scientific model of the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR). I presented it at the German Society for Radioprotection/ ECRR conference in Berlinin May 2011.

This showed that there would be some 200,000 extra cancers in roughly 10 million population in the 200km radius of the site in the next 10 years, and 400,000 over 50 years. The current risk model adhered to and employed by the Japanese government is that of the International Commission of Radiological Protection, the ICRP. This predicts that no detectable cancers will be seen as a result of the “very low doses” received by the population.

Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/25/worse-than-chernobyl-the-inner-threat-of-fukushima-crisis/

http://www.stewwebb.com/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/
http://www.stewwebb.com/stew-webb-radio-interviews/
http://www.youtube/stewwebb1

 




NSA Surveillance: On Edward Snowden’s Oath and Motives

NSA Surveillance: On Edward Snowden’s Oath and Motives

Edward_Snowden_Whistleblower_or_Stooge

By Allan Weisbecker

“If Edward Snowden is who he says he is, he is a true hero and patriot. If, as some evidence might suggest, he is part of a psy-op meant to further subvert our Constitution, then he is not. But either way, the information he has helped make public can be turned against those whose life’s work is to deceive us.”–Allan Weisbecker

As I write, it’s been more than two months since Edward Snowden hit the media front page and I’m still waiting for someone to mention that Snowden, as a federal employee (of both the CIA and the NSA, plus the Army), took the following oath:

I, Edward Snowden, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Keep in mind that the oath uses two words – ‘support and defend’ — where one would easily do. The framers not being disposed to redundancy, this, I assume, is to accentuate, to make absolutely clear, the seriousness of the matter of the oath. And the framers are not done on the subject. The very next phrase states that Snowden must ‘bear true faith and allegiance’ to the Constitution, the obvious subtext being that not only must Snowden act in supporting and defending, but he must actually feel a certain way — having ‘true faith’ is not even voluntary!

Presumably, this clause is meant to weed out (from federal employment) people who do not in their gut believe in the Constitution — if you do not or cannot ‘bear true faith and allegiance’ to the Constitution, look elsewhere for employment. (This inability describes virtually all of our elected officials – who take a similar oath – although this is a slightly separate subject.)

“What about the oath, Ed?”

Also keep in mind that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, whereas whatever law it is alleged that Snowden broke, be it the Espionage Act, or Theft of Government Property, or whatever they want to come up with, are not. This is a lawful obligation. In other words, if Edward Snowden witnessed a crime against the Constitution he was legally obliged to expose it.

We also need to keep in mind that the abuses to which the information being obtained are vast and various, ranging from knowing how members of Congress are planning to vote to whether the Director of the CIA might be having an affair.  They include violations of doctor/patient, lawyer/client and teacher/student confidentiality.  They afford opportunities to make enormous sums on the stock market on the basis of insider information.  The potential for blackmail or for identifying “enemies of the national security state” are endless.  And remember that virtually all US intel is process in Tel Aviv.  Israel’s access knows no bounds!

If in fact we are going to assume (or pretend) that the United States is a country wherein rule of law is taken seriously, and if the Constitution is indeed the Supreme Law of the Land, any legitimate threat to its tenets as perceived by an oath-taker must take precedence over any other law, be it state or federal. This is not only a clear interpretation of the Constitution itself, but has been upheld by case law, including the Supreme Court (Marbury vs Madison, among others).

The Fourth Amendment

So, in accessing Snowden’s guilt or innocence — it being a legal matter — let’s see what we’re dealing with; let’s define our terms. Let’s first take a look at the Supreme Law of the Land, the one most clearly applicable passage, i.e., the 4th Amendment in the Bill of Rights:

Clearly, this clause defines what ‘an authority’ (be it local, state, or federal) can ‘seize’ from ‘the people.’ (The Constitution differentiates between ‘person’ and ‘citizen,’ ‘person’ referring to any human being, citizen or not. The 4th Amendment applies to anyone under the jurisdiction of the United States.)

Since the programs Snowden has exposed involve illegal wiretaps, let’s look up the legal definition of ‘wiretap’ (I hope you’re already wondering why you haven’t heard/read this before, but more on the media to come.):

A form of electronic eavesdropping accomplished by seizing or overhearing communications by means of a concealed recording or listening device connected to the transmission line.

Notice that the legal definition of ‘wiretap’ uses the same word as does the 4th Amendment, where the latter refers to what authorities cannot do without a warrant: ‘Seize.’ (‘Seize’ being defined as ‘take possession by force’; ‘capture’; ‘confiscate’.) Times have changed since the framing of the Bill of Rights, i.e., what is referred to by ‘papers and effects.’ As defined by lower and U.S. Supreme Court decisions, ‘papers and effects’ includes telephonic and electronic communications. Any private communication between individuals is sacrosanct under the Supreme Law of the Land.

Media Obfuscation

For our purposes, simply put: a court adjudicated warrant must be issued to ‘seize’ your phone calls and emails. (In U.S. vs Warshak,,the Sixth Circuit Court recognized that email is equivalent to a letter or phone call for the purposes of the 4th Amendment.) The Patriot Act broadened wiretapping rules, giving authorities the right to seize phone records as long as they exclude message content. This is the greatest point of media-generated obfuscation in the issue of Edward Snowden’s guilt or innocence; ditto re the issue of possible felonies perpetrated by other federal officials. Right or wrong, as of now, it is not illegal to seize ‘meta-data,’ i.e., phone records (again, excluding content).

Do you get it? No? I’ll spell it out:

Even after the Constitution-busting Patriot Act, you still need a warrant to ‘seize’ content of phone calls and emails. As soon as you record and archive communications, you are ‘seizing’ it.

Does anyone have an argument with that? One more time:

AS SOON AS CONTENT HAS BEEN RECORDED WITHOUT A WARRANT, THE 4TH AMENDMENT HAS BEEN BREACHED. NO ONE HAS TO LISTEN TO (OR READ) THE CONTENT FOR THE CRIME OF WIRETAPPING WITHOUT A WARRANT TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED.

To argue that ‘wiretapping’ has not occurred if no one has listened to (or read) the content is like saying it’s okay to rob a bank, as long as you don’t spend the money. It’s a legally, morally, and logically indefensible position. Yet this is the position taken by the media and the government in the matter of Edward Snowden.

It is my view – and it’s the purpose of this essay to demonstrate – that the ‘Snowden issue’ may be — and I believe it is — a carefully crafted psy-op meant to subvert the Constitution — principally the 4th Amendment — by redefining ‘wiretap’ and other associated terms, including ‘surveillance,’ ‘eavesdrop,’ ‘target,’ and the like.

NSA “Seizures”

Now let’s decide whether the NSA is in fact ‘seizing’ the content of phone and email communications (for simplicity’s sake we’ll leave out other types of data, google searches and the like). Remember the David Petraeus/John Allen affair last year? No? A reminder:

Click on lik to read full report and watch video:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/14/nsa-surveillance-on-edward-snowdens-oath-and-motives/

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com
Stew Webb Whistleblowers Latest Articles on Veterans Today
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb
Stew Webb Founder:
You did not Vote them in but you can remove them!
http://www.recallpetitions.com
Now you can leak it
http://www.wikiarmy.com
August 2013 Fund Raiser
http://www.stewwebb.com

 




The Kennedys vs Israel’s Lobby: How Israel gained Control of American Foreign Policy

The Kennedys vs Israel’s Lobby: How Israel gained Control of American Foreign Policy

Veterans_Today_Jim_Fetzer_PHD

By Grant F. Smith and Heshim Tillawi, Ph.D.

”Israel need not apologize for the assassination or destruction of those who seek to destroy it. The first order of business for any country is the protection of its people.”–Washington Jewish Week (October 9, 1997)

[Editor’s note: Neither of these articles is of recent vintage:  the first appeared on 28 August 2009, the second 13 September 2009. But their significance has grown over the years and they deserve a wide readership today.]

AIPAC Founder Isaiah L. Kenen and Ted Kennedy

The lobby’s accolades for the late Ted Kennedy and his support of Israel mask the generally unknown conflicts fought by the senator’s older brothers.  It is likely that lessons from the fiercest of all battles, fought behind the scenes by President John F. Kennedy alongside his brother and Attorney General Robert—guided the younger sibling’s political choices.  Details of the JFK-RFK duo’s effort to register the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) parent organization, the American Zionist Council (AZC) as an Israeli foreign agent were shrouded in mystery until declassified in mid-2008.

Between 1962 and 1963 Senator J.W. Fulbright uncovered a massive network of financial “conduits” moving funds directed by the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem to Israel lobby startup groups across the United States.  Even as JFK attempted to place Israel’s Dimona nuclear weapons program under US inspection, RFK ordered the AZC to openly register and disclose all of its foreign funded lobbying activity in the United States.

The DOJ and AZC fought their secret battle as Fulbright’s hearings disclosed the immense proportions of the Israel lobby effort.  Nathan B. Lenvin, a DOJ attorney who had been after AIPAC’s founder Isaiah Kenen since 1951 to continue registering as a foreign agent after he left the employ of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs took copious notes of the many meetings, AZC’s offers of limited registration and the DOJ’s counter offers.

But the law enforcement effort ended in tragedy.  JFK’s assassination on November 12, 1963 in Dallas meant RFK’s political cover for the prosecution was gone and his days at the DOJ were numbered.  He left to run for a New York senate seat.  In 1965 the DOJ allowed the AZC to file a highly redacted and non-standardized FARA declaration in secret.  The AZC then shut down and transferred lobbying activity to AIPAC, which refused to register.

RFK’s assassination in 1968 was followed a few months later by the quiet death of the 58 year old Nathan Lenvin during a DOJ recruiting trip in Chicago.  Low level DOJ officials involved in the AZC registration battle such as Irene Bowman were gently eased out, while high officials willing to defer to the lobby, such as Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach and J. Walter Yeagley, moved on to stellar careers.

As details of the secret DOJ-Israel lobby showdowns continue to emerge, it is hard not to conclude that the younger Kennedy’s renowned accommodation, mastered as a child from within the shadows of his siblings, was as much a survival strategy as the hallmark of an effective politician.

The Israeli Occupation of America: How Israel Gained Control of American Foreign Policy and Public Opinion

 

By Hesham Tillawi, Ph.D.

”Israel need not apologize for the assassination or destruction of those who seek to destroy it. The first order of business for any country is the protection of its people.”–Washington Jewish Week (October 9, 1997)

I came from a country occupied militarily by Israel to the land of “the free and the brave” only to find out it too was occupied politically by Israel.

The Palestinian people, holding on to whatever shred of hope they can, are counting on the day Americans see the error of their ways and change their opinion of the whole Middle East situation and understand it for what it truly is–A conquered, oppressed people living a hellish existence under a maniacal, occupying power and who will then contact their representatives in Congress and have them put the heat on Israel in fulfilling the agreements she made years ago with the PLO such as Oslo, Taba, Camp David, Wye River, the Road Map, or even Annapolis.

The sad fact however is that the Americans–as much as they champion themselves as a “free people”–are in no better shape than the Palestinians. On the contrary, the American position is worse than that of the Palestinians. The Palestinians can identify the enemy–he is the one with the gun and blowing away their loved ones. They KNOW they are occupied and oppressed. They KNOW how Israel occupied Palestine, killed its inhabitants and forced the majority of those who survived the carnage out of their homes and lands to then live as strangers in refugee camps.

The Americans however, have no idea. Like a drug addict who thinks he feels great after shooting up, he does not realize he is a slave, to his substance and to his pusher. The history of how the Zionists’ controlled England is not shrouded in mystery. Through Jewish control of the British government the Balfour Declaration was drafted that “gave” the land of Palestine to the Jews after WWI, a land they did not own or possess.

But how in the world did they occupy the United States politically? There is no real “Balfour Declaration” we can point to as proof.

Or can we?

Jewish influence in American politics

Jewish influence in American politics–while there from the earliest days and certainly apparent during the Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman administrations–did not become the force it is today until the Kennedy era, or, rather, AFTER the Kennedy era.

As all know, in 1961 John Kennedy became the 35th President of the United States, a presidency cut short as a result of his assassination in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Robert Kennedy, the president’s younger brother was Attorney General of the United States and therefore the head of the Department of Justice.

What is little-known is that the Kennedy’s realized early on that indeed the country was in trouble and that something needed to be done about it. The trouble in this case was the influence slithering its way into American political life from a far-away state only about 12 years old known as Israel. Both Kennedy brothers, learning politics at their father Joseph’s knee, understood the dynamic of this thing known as “Jewish interests”, how it would play out and what the repercussions would be for America.

Of the many issues revolving around Israel and the Zionist question the two more important as pertains the Jewish state were (A) Israel’s nuclear program, and (B) the issue of an organization known as the American Zionist Council.

The American Zionist Council

According to Pulitzer Prize winning author Seymour Hersh, President Kennedy was profoundly committed to nuclear nonproliferation and was categorically opposed to nuclear weapons in the Middle East, which meant opposing Israel’s nuclear program. Hersh states that JFK exerted heavy pressure on Israel to stop the program and was serious about it. At the time Kennedy was in the middle of crises mode with the Russians in trying to arrange a nonproliferation treaty with them and therefore Israel’s nuclear program would be a big embarrassment. In addition to being an embarrassment it would open up the possibility of a nuclear conflict with Russia, given her allies in the Middle East, something made all the more believable in the aftermath of the Cuban Missile Crisis that almost resulted in a nuclear war between the two giants. John Kennedy had nightmares about the prospect of nuclear proliferation, saying “I am haunted by the feeling that by 1970, unless we are successful, there may be ten nuclear powers instead of four, and by 1975, 15 to 20…. I see the possibility in the 1970s of the president of the United States having to face a world in which 15 or 25 nations may have these weapons. I regard this as the greatest possible danger and hazard.”

Secret letters and secret meetings between Kennedy and Ben-Gurion give a clear picture of the difficulty Kennedy faced in negotiating with the Israeli Prime Minister who stated many times that nothing will save Israel but nuclear power. According to author Michael Collins Piper in his book Final Judgment Ben Gurion wrote Kennedy saying: “Mr. President, my people have the right to exist, and this existence is in danger.”

It does not take a skilled translater to figure out what Ben Gurion was saying, namely that Kennedy’s opposition to nuclear weapons in the Middle East was seen as an existential threat to the Jewish people and their newly-formed state. Going further, Kennedy insisted on inspections of Israel’s program as evidenced in a secret letter sent to then-Israeli Prime Minister Levy Eshkol that stated that American support of Israel “could be jeopardized” if the Americans were not allowed to inspect the Israeli nuclear facilities.

Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/11/the-kennedys-vs-israels-lobby-how-israel-gained-control-of-american-foreign-policy/

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb
Stew Webb Founder:
You did not Vote them in but you can remove them!
http://www.recallpetitions.com
Now you can leak it
http://www.wikiarmy.com
July 2013 Fund Raiser
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/fXc61
Also contribute through
http://www.stewwebb.com

 

 




Radio Professor James Fetzer smashed Government 911 spin doctor Dick Eastman

Radio Professor James Fetzer smashed Government 911 spin doctor Dick Eastman

Veterans_Today_Jim_Fetzer_PHD

Look for July 18, 2013 in Archives Click on link below:

http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/

Mike Harris

http://www.mikeharris.us

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb
Stew Webb Founder:
You did not Vote them in but you can remove them!
http://www.recallpetitions.com
Now you can leak it
http://www.wikiarmy.com
July 2013 Fund Raiser
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/fXc61
Also contribute through
http://www.stewwebb.com




Radio Jim Fetzer interviews Stew Webb Whistleblower

Radio Jim Fetzer interviews Stew Webb

Veterans_Today_Jim_Fetzer_PHD

http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/fetzer/

http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com

June 20, 2013

Will play in windows media player and other browers 1/2 hour each:

Please click on links below to listen:

http://www.stewwebb.com/Jim_Fetzer_interviews_Stew_Webb_Part1_20130620.mp3
http://www.stewwebb.com/Jim_Fetzer_interviews_Stew_Webb_Part2_20130620.mp3
http://www.stewwebb.com/Jim_Fetzer_interviews_Stew_Webb_Part3_20130620.mp3
http://www.stewwebb.com/Jim_Fetzer_interviews_Stew_Webb_Part4_20130620.mp3

http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com

Related links:

Stew Webb and VT was right Illuminati Sacrifice Busted
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/22/vt-was-right-illuminati-sacrifice-busted/
http://www.stewwebb.com/2013/06/23/vt-was-right-illuminati-sacrifice-busted/

http://www.stewwebb.com/archives/

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb
Stew Webb Founder:
You did not Vote them in but you can remove them!
http://www.recallpetitions.com
Now you can leak it
http://www.wikiarmy.com
June 2013 Fund Raiser
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/fXc61
Also contribute through
http://www.stewwebb.com




Senate Betrays Constitution for Israel Commitment to attack Iran

Senate Betrays Constitution for Israel: Commitment to attack Iran

by Jim Fetzer (with M.J. Rosenberg)


One more war for Israel

In a stunning betrayal of the Constitution of the United States, which obligates the United States to confirm to international law, the US Senate has before it a resolution that commits the nation to support Israel militarily, diplomatically, and economically should it decide to attack Iran “in its legitimate self-defense”, where every action Israel has ever taken–from the Six Days War to its incursions into Lebanon–has been deemed by the American government to be “in its legitimate self-defense”.

The resolution states:

If the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self defense against Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with United States law and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.

As M.J. Rosenberg has observed,

[T]he “self-defense” limitation is no limitation at all. The United States has deemed all major Israeli military actions as “self-defense” (most recently two Gaza wars) with the oft-repeated statement that the United States is “fully supportive of Israel’s right to defend itself.” Couple that with President Obama’s language ruling out containment of a nuclear Iran and it’s pretty clear that any attack by Israel on Iran will be deemed self-defense by the United States.

Rand Paul (R-KY) has been doing what he can to tone down the resolution, but whether he can prevail is yet to be seen. While this is a non-binding resolution that does not have the force of law in committing the nation to support Israel under these circumstances, it does express “the sense of the Senate”. While the President is obligated by the Constitution to seek its “advice and consent”, this commitment violates international law and the UN Charter and therefore the Constitution itself.

At the very least, AIPAC should be required to register as a “foreign agent”. It’s virtually complete domination of American foreign policy has led wits to describe us as “the United States of Israel”. The problem is that this is not a joke, where “our gallant ally” is drawing us deeper and deeper into a conflict which has enormous potential to precipitate World War III. It is a positive sign that Russia has intervened in Syria. It will not stand idly by while Israel and the United States attack Iran.

Iran poses no imminent treat to the US or to Israel, where the stunning stupidity of the Senate resolution emerges from the reflection that (1) Iran has no nuclear weapons program, much less any nukes; (2) that the casualties from an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear energy facilities would be catastrophic; and (3) that Israel is not an ally of the United States, but is committed to advancing its own interests, regardless of the consequences for the US or, indeed, for the world at large.

(1) Iran has no nuclear weapons program

Iran not only has no nuclear weapons program but is a peaceful nation that has not attacked any other country for more than 300 years. The Supreme Leader of Iran, The Ayatolla Khoumani, has declared, “Nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapons for none”. Iran has signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has allowed inspectors. All 16 US intel agencies concluded in 2007 that Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapons program, a conclusion that it reaffirmed in 2011.

Israel, by contrast, has more than 200 and as many as 600 of these little beauties. It has never signed the NPT and will not allow inspectors. The War against Terror was an Israeli contrivance to set the United States on a course to dismantle the sophisticated Arab states and leave Israel with uncontested domination of the Middle East. Upon his return from serving as Supreme Commander, Allied Forces Europe, Gen. Wesley Clark was presented with a plan to dismantle seven Arab nations in the next five years. Syria and Iran are the final stages of this Israeli plan.

[youtube oXS7IsOdu-A‎]

(2) The civilian casualties would be catastrophic

Estimates have it that an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear energy facilities would bring about an estimated 1 million Iranian deaths outright and another 35,000,000 premature deaths as the cloud of pollution swept across Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. Even if there were proof of an Iranian nuclear weapons program, what could possibly justify an atrocity of this magnitude? Yet the US Senate would have our nation become complicit in one of the greatest atrocities of human history?

For the sake of comparison, according to the “official account”, some 6,000,000 Jews died during the Holocaust. Set aside that the International Committee of the Red Cross maintained detailed records that support perhaps 600,000 deaths of Jews, gypsies and the mentally and physically impaired, Benjamin Netanyahu is willing to sacrifice six times the number of deaths alleged to have taken place during the Holocaust to promote Israel’s political domination of the Middle East.

 Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/21/senate-betrays-constitution-for-israel-commitment-to-attack-iran/

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/

 




9/11 Widow & Lawyer sanctioned by Corrupt Zionist Judge

9/11 Widow & Lawyer sanctioned by Corrupt Zionist Judge

9/11 Widow & lawyer sanctioned for motions which “reflect anti-Semitism in a raw and ugly form.”

By Martin Hill

LibertyFight.com

Ellen with Louis prior to 9/11

A federal court in New York has sanctioned the widow of a 9/11 victim as well as her attorney, for filing “a series of offensive insinuations, unmistakably anti-Semitic.” California Attorney Bruce Leichty and Appellant Ellen Mariani were both chided and fined by the court in an 11-page decision dated May 15th. The case, Ransmeier v. UAL Corporation, et al., was heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. “We conclude that Appellant and her attorney’s conduct in prosecuting this appeal was frivolous and offensive,” the court proclaimed, “and therefore warrants the imposition of sanctions.”

Our October 2012 run-down ‘9/11 Widow Faces Sanctions For Objecting To Judges Israeli Ties‘ was dubbed an “excellent article” by the Ellen Mariani Legal Defense Fund and explains how the 9/11 widow and her lawyer were threatened with sanctions for “deeply troubling personal slurs” against U.S. District Court Judge Alvin Hellerstein. [Editor’s note: It is republished below.]

The court’s decison filed Wednesday chides Leichty for making “personal slurs against Judge Hellerstein and his family” and alleges “In fact, on closer observation, Leichty’s real argument is that Judge Hellerstein cannot be impartial because he is Jewish.”

The court also sanctioned Mariani, one of the few 911 survivors who had the nerve to refused to be paid off. They noted that Mariani “is a veteran of federal court litigation” and that she signed a motion which included “some of the most offensive allegations against Judge Hellerstein.” The court concluded therefore that “Mariani, too, is therefore jointly responsible with her attorney for the double costs imposed by this Order.”

As we previously reported, Mariani’s April 19, 2012 brief noted in part that “Judge Hellerstein and his wife Mildred are known to be active supporters of Israeli causes, and it is implausible that Judge Hellerstein would not at least be on inquiry notice of the affiliations of his son’s law firm and the connections of his son’s clients to Israeli and Israeli-linked defendants in a case before him, particularly in a case of the magnitude of the 911 case.” It continued “It is not plausible that Judge Hellerstein, a highly-educated and connected supporter of Israeli causes, was unaware of the connections of his son’s law firm.”

Ironically, in their May 15th decision, the court in the Mariani case repeatedly referred to Gallop v. Cheney, another case in which a 9/11 victim sued the government, only to have her case thrown out and financial sanctions imposed. [See Bush court dismisses 9/11 suit against Bush officials, orders sanctions, globalresearch.ca.]

The court closed the decision noting that they were actually being easy on the two, once again referring to the April Gallop case: “Although we have authority to impose additional sanctions in the form of fines or attorney’s fees on Mariani and Attorney Leichty, see Gallop III, 660 F.3d at 586, we decline to do so at this time. We trust that this relatively public reprimand will suffice to prevent similar transgressions in the future.”

Below are some of the highlights (or rather lowlights) of the courts excoriating admonitions of the Plaintiff and Counsel who ‘dared’ to question the integrity of a public servant. The entire PDF of the ruling can be see here.

Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/18/911-widow-lawyer-sanctioned-for-protesting-judges-zionist-connections/

Related Article by Stew Webb:

911 Widow Questions Why MSNBC Host Silenced Her

Scarborough Country becomes “9-11 Spin Country” as Ellen Mariani says
her microphone was abruptly shut off in the middle of her September 11 expose
during an interview Monday night. U.S. intelligence sources say the national
cover-up of the mysterious death of host Joe Scarborough’s former female
congressional aide—found in his district office—is linked to why the truth about
9-11 was cut off by the MSNBC host

http://www.stewwebb.com/911_widow_questions_why_msnbc_host_silenced_her.htm

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb

 




Radio Special Kerry Cassidy interviews James Fetzer and Stew Webb

Radio Special Kerry Cassidy interviews James Fetzer and Stew Webb

Special RT Kerry Cassidy-Stew Webb – James Fetzer

http://youtu.be/iYk9os1uxSU

Gordon_Duff

US dictatorship and its free fall

By Gordon Duff Editor Veterans Today

http://www.stewwebb.com/news/us-dictatorship-and-its-free-fall/

 

Veterans_Today_Jim_Fetzer_PHD

Jim Fetzer Veterans Today and his Radio Program

http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/fetzer/

Stew_Webb_Veterans_Today_Columnist

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb/

 

 




Radio Jim Fetzer and Stew Webb May 13 2013

Radio Jim Fetzer and Stew Webb May 13, 2013

Click on link below to listen to interview:

Radio Jim Fetzer and Stew Webb
http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-webb%20cimino.mp3
http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-webb%20cimino.mp3

Jim Fetzer Live:

http://www.revereradionetwork.com
Archived Shows:
http://www.radiofetzer.blogspot.com

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/swebb

 




Obama violates US and International Law in Pakistan

Obama violates US and International Law in Pakistan

by Jim Fetzer and Press TV

“Imran Khan is taking a courageous and principled stance. . . . Let us hope that other nations will follow his lead.”–Jim Fetzer

As an outcry is growing over the increasing use of drones by the United States both at home and abroad, an American professor says President Barack Obama is now “violating not only American constitutional law but international law.”

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan Saturday reiterated that he would order that Pakistan Air Force to target U.S. drones in country’s airspace if people elected him as Prime Minster.

“That’s a courageous and principled stance,” said Fetzer who is an editor at The Veterans Today.

“We know from past experience that vast numbers of civilians who have nothing to do with any political issue are being killed by drone attacks”, he added.

Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/06/obama-violates-us-and-international-law-in-pakistan/

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News Daily

Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets

http://www.stewwebb.com

 




Mystery Solved The WTC was Nuked on 911

Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11

911_WTC_Tower

By Don Fox, Ed Ward, M.D., and Jeff Prager

A debate has raged for more than a decade about what caused the Twin Towers to “collapse” in approximately 10 seconds each — 9 seconds for the South Tower, 11 for the North. A large and growing percentage of the public has become skeptical of the conclusion of the government’s official NCSTAR 1 report, according to which, “NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to 9/11.”

Skepticism of NIST’s conclusions is well founded. There is eyewitness testimony as well as abundant video and audio evidence of explosions at the WTC on 9/11. There is also seismic data that demonstrates that high powered explosives were used to demolish the Twin Towers. The gross observable video evidence — if you are willing to believe your own eyes — shows that the Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down and the inside out.

We believe that only mini-nukes — which were probably neutron bombs — planted in the center columns of the buildings, detonated from top to bottom and configured to explode upward, can explain what is observed. If they were used to blow apart one ten-floor cube per second, for example, then, since the North Tower stood at 110 floors, that would have taken 11 seconds, while, since the top three cubes of the South Tower tilted over and were blown as one, in that case, it would have taken only 9, which coincides with NIST’s own times.

This is a controversial contention. Judy Wood, Ph.D., has proclaimed that a Tesla-inspired directed energy weapon (DEW) was responsible for the destruction of the WTC buildings and has vehemently denied nuclear bombs were used. Steve Jones, Ph.D., and his followers promote the theory that an incendiary (nanothermite) was the cause of the destruction of the WTC buildings, while they also deny that nukes were used. So these seemingly opposed camps agree on one thing: nukes were not used on 9/11!
The nanothermite hypothesis has been discredited on multiple occasions in articles by T. Mark Hightower and Jim Fetzer, including “Has nanothermite been oversold to the 9/11 community?”, “Is ’9/11 truth’ based upon a false theory?”, and “Nanothermite: If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit”. Since it is a principle (law) of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!

The DEW hypothesis turns out to be difficult to test, since Judy Wood defines DEWs as sources of energy that are greater than conventional and can be directed, which even encompasses micro and mini nukes within its scope. As earlier articles have explained, including “9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II” and “Mini Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle”, there are multiple grounds for preferring the mini or micro nuke hypothesis over the DEW alternative, which emerge with particular clarity from a study of the dust samples collected by the US Geological Survey. It is ironic that, while the “thermite sniffers” also focus on dust samples, they seem to have missed what we have to learn from them.

Indeed, the nuclear component of the decimation of World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, 6 and 7 is the darkest and most closely guarded secret of 9/11. With so many folks claiming different theories it is difficult for average people to know what to believe. Fortunately, we have scientific proof of what happened at Ground Zero. The dust and water samples reveal the true story of what happened on 9/11. This article thus provides more of the scientific evidence–especially from the USGS dust samples–that settles the debate in favor of the demolition of the WTC buildings as having been a nuclear event.

Debris Ejected over 600 feet

Click on link below to read full report:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/01/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/

Whistleblowers US Intel Breaking News Daily
Now on Computers, Mobile and Tablets
http://www.stewwebb.com

 








Obama-admits-US-trains-ISIS-july-2015-stewwebb

HildaBeast-StewWebb
Stew Webb Whistle blower Grand Jury Demand against Hillary Clinton "Still Active" Where is the Justice Department, having Lesbo Demonic Sex with Hillary Clinton?

Stew Webb Radio Network

stewwebbradionetwork-com-2015-09-24
Stew Webb 32 Years a Federal Whistleblower

You can Mute the Audio

AudioNow

StewWebb-RadioNetwork-Store
Stew Webb Radio Network Store

Stew Webb Breaking News

Breaking News

Help support the Radio Network

The below picture of the attempted murder of Stew Webb October 25, 2010 by two of Hillary Clinton's Assassins. There were two more crashed and attempts one year later.
Contributions are much appreciated Thank You.-- Stew Webb





Archives

U.S. President Donald Trump


Donald J. Trump's Website

Donald Trump Full Speeches

Donald Trump Presidential Announcement Full Speech 6/16/15

TEXT TRUMP TO 88022 TO GET EXCLUSIVE UPDATES
***By participating, you consent to receiving automated text messages from the campaign. Standard messaging rates apply.***

To donate, go here: https://secure.donaldjtrump.com/donate/
Contributions are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.

P.S. If you would like to purchase official campaign gear, click here.

#NoHildaBeast #NoHildadike #NoHillaryClintonChildRapist

Gun_Dog
Spot Dog is on the loose he loves to eat Illuminati, Zionist, Satanists and Lying Media Political Whores.
flagususmcflag france_flag


Stew Webb Whistle blower Grand Jury Demand Still Active against Hillary Clinton aka "HildaBeast". Where is the Justice Department having Lesbo Demonic Sex with Hillary Clinton?
Obama-admits-US-trains-ISIS-july-2015-stewwebb
Hillary Clinton aka "HildaBeast"
 

Is this what we want for a President?Is this what we want for a President?
Posted by Donald J. Trump on Wednesday, March 16, 2016

 
Hillary Clinton above Barking Like A Female Dog now Spot Dog wants to have hot sex with Hildabeast and HikdaDikes Lesbo Lover Huma Abedine we told the Spot dog his private part will fall off because HildaBeast is a Walking STD
Gun_Dog

Hillary-Clinton-Child-Rapist
Hillary Clinton Child Rapist
Hillarys-America
Hillary's America The Movie