Questions That Need To
Be Answered
Ambassador Leo Wanta Update
Part 2 of 2
Breaking News Saturday 20, 2010
http://blogs.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel
by Tom Heneghan
International Intelligence Expert 
UNITED STATES of America -
Further update from Ambassador Leo Wanta:
View Part 1 of 2 above or click on url
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=147509065&blogId=531286377
Continued:
6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act
constitute a
violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the
Bank
Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.
7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation
and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have
access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced
herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties
avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance
of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters
and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A
attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are
incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their
entirety in the body of this Petition.
8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting
from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be
addressed in conventional judicial proceedings.
In one or more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the
representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between
Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by
individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents.
Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment
of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United
States Treasury.
E. BACKGROUND:
9. On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number
02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered
case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case)
the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue
liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required
taxes in accordance with the law (3).
10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United
States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign
countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.
11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006,
Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan
(Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic
of China.
The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate
cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets
referenced herein. Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined
that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with
petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that
had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period
of time.
12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan,
the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens
& Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the
preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred
to collectively as “settlement documents”. The following is a compilation of
the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or
beneficiaries of the settlement documents:
• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).
• National Security Agency (NSA).
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Director of National Intelligence.
• United States State Department.
• United States Department of the Treasury.
• United States Department of Defense.
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President
and Vice President.
• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney
Sr.).
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations
participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not
limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition.
The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents
prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion
United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the
petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.
13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and
unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through
international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America
located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred
funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein.
This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively
as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.
14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August
2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization
of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s
Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond,
Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank
New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the
People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House
Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to
New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond.
The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended
recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The
transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank
put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner
without the authorization of United States Treasury.
At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph
14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson
and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the “Securities Acts”
accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at
CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of
Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.
15. The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are
contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the
transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the
recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by
the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the
financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner.
Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be
provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary
{Henry M.] Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization
to the compliance officers.
In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been
contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers
that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist
from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.
16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in
paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing
the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense.
These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided
by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information
and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged
and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner
have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson
and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of
America elected and/or nominated officials.
17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal
recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an
Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United
States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of
China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of
the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice
Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to
the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all
assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.
18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative
authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of
lawful funds. The said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there
is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in
official United States government agency documents as being the sole and
exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this
Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and
all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent
authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.
19. Petitioner individually and as sole and exclusive controlling shareholder
of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
certifies as follows:
• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at
the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the
sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the
People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.
• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the “Claims and
Background” set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that
the same are true and correct.
• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and
certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the “Statement of Claim and
Background” are true and correct.
• Upon best information and belief “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public,
private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with
specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or
conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and
1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control
Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. legislation and applicable international and
national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned
Respondents’ acting individually and/or “acting in concert” violate
Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to
private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal
penalties.
Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain
explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the “Rule
of Law” and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts
referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response
the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to
commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful
violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of
this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this
Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked
as Exhibits A, B and C (4) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this
petition.
F. CONCLUSION:
21. The “Statement of Claim and Background” demonstrate “(1) the presence of
novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available
remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in
the administration of justice”.
G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
1. Emergency consideration of this Petition with an expedited response time for
Respondents to respond to this Petition and an expedited time for the Court to
hear the merits of this matter.
2. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper to protect
the Constitutionally protected rights of the
Petitioner.
Executed on this 18th day of June 2007.
[Signed]
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA _Pro_Se
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
Telephone: 814 455 9218
Telefax: 202 330 5116
AFFIDAVIT
The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim
of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the
consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make
the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being
filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia:
1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United
States of America.
2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative,
investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments
that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the
supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the
Executive Offices of the United States Government
3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate
the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to
the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated
funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed
the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.
4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my
attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the
banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including
one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as
Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.
5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s
Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and
that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were
“tagged” in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of
China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.
6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation
compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States
Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s
Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one
or more parties.
7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment
of financial assets to my designated accounts is not
known absolutely.
8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the
Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my
unrestricted use.
9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were
transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the
demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.
10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to
release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts
established in my name, that directives have been received from known and
unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and
unrestricted access to financial assets that are “tagged” solely and
exclusively in my name.
IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized
and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June
2007.
[Signed]
Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta
and
Ambassador Leo E. Wanta
TOM HENEGHAN'S EXPLOSIVE INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS
International Intelligence Expert, Tom Heneghan,
has hundreds of highly credible sources inside American and European
Intelligence Agencies and INTERPOL--reporting what is REALLY going on behind
the scenes of the corporate-controlled mainstream media cover up propaganda of
on-going massive deceptions and illusions.