KARL SCHWARZ HILLARY CLINTON STOOGE OR 9-11 TRUTH SEEKER?

www.stewwebb.com 

[email protected] 

March 22, 2006

Beware of the propaganda by Bush Crime Family Stooge and disinformation liar Karl Schwarz, who claims to be a 9-11 Whistleblower. Karl's company had ties to an Israeli company that installed the telephone system in the Congress and Senate Office buildings. 

Why would an ISRAELI COMPANY want to listen to the calls of the Congress and Senate? Espionage! Treason! 

Schwarz has been working directly with Bush Nazi Goons Denver FBI Stooge Tim White. 

This in itself says a lot. see: www.stewwebb.com/BushesNaziGoonsNews.html Tim White, Larry Lawson and Ted Gunderson are on FBI Denver payroll and their Boss Denver FBI SAC Mark Hostlaw are in deep trouble for outing CIA Agents names and home address on the internet. 

This is the same activity of George W. Bush that got Scooter Libby indicted for outing CIA Agent Valoire Plame. See: www.StewWebb.com/Patrick Fitzgerald Denver FBI Tim White leaking CIA agents on Internet.htm   

Schwartz who claims to be against the Bushes is in direct communications with VK Durham, who has talked directly with George H. W. Bush within the past 6 months who has offered Durham money deals to keep her mouth shut over the Brady Bonds. 

Karl Schwartz admitted that Durham has talked with Bush to Tom Flocco. 

Why is Schwartz communicating with people who talk to George H. W. Bush? 

Why is Schwartz offering money to Barbara Hartwell and other people to slander and defame Tom Heneghan and Stew Webb. 

Barbara Hartwell is now in bed with the same people Tim White that she was exposing for the past 4 years. www.stewwebb.com/BushesNaziGoonsNews.html  

Ask yourself a question where is Karl Schwartz from? 

Arkansas and who are the Criminals from Arkansas the Clintons. Who was killed in Arkansas? 

Moody Cooper who was a relative of White House Aid and Hillary Lesbo Clintons law partner Vince Foster. 

Why does Karl Schwarz have some of the Moody Cooper Documents and where did he get them after Coopers death? 

US Intel sources who posses these same documents are wondering how Schwartz got his copies after someone was killed. Why would Schwartz suddenly claim in 2004 to be a rich Patriot going to get to the bottom of 9-11? 

Who paid for the first run of Schwarz book? Jimmy Walters the millionaire who claims he-Walters wants to get to the bottom of 9-11. 

If that where the case with Jimmy Walters then why did Walters finance the Division 5 FBI disinformation Goons who claimed to be the 9-11 group leaders seeking 9-11 truth but never came up with any significant evidence. 

Was Jimmy Walters lied to by these FBI #5 Goons? 

Was Jimmy Walters drained of nearly 6 million dollars by the Karl Schwartz types? 

Did Jimmy Walters want to get to the truth about 9-11? 

Why is Karl Schwarz so afraid of the website? see  www.yayacanada.com/9-11-4e.html 

what is on this site that drives Karl Schwartz nearly insane? 

Why is Karl Schwarz so afraid of this website? www.yayacanada.com/9-11-4d.html documents from the State of Arkansas. See below.

Why is Karl Schwarz so afraid of this website? www.portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/05/316680.shtml spook or strutter? See below

Is Karl Schwarz using an alias aka John Carlson reporter to promote himself? Carlson seems to be unreachable by telephone and no contact information except an email that anyone can create Schwarz and Carlson are using the same server. John if you are not Karl Swartz send me your telephone number through email to [email protected] I want to be accurate. 

Why did Karl Schwarz seek an investor from Tom Heneghan Federal Whistleblower for Schwarz so-called company? 

What did Tom Heneghan find out about Karl Schwartz that Tom Heneghan would not invest in Schwarz company. 

WHY did Karl Schwarz immediately began attacking the reputation of Tom Heneghan and Stew Webb after Heneghan would not invest with Schwarz? 

Schwartz claims he paid over $80,000.00 in proceeds from his book that does not connect the dots of the Bush Crime Family to Radio Talk Show Hosts John Stadtmiller, Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, and others to put him on the air. 

Where these payments in violations of Federal Laws? These three shows never put real Whistleblowers on their Radio Programs. 

These three promote the FEAR FACTOR BUY MY VIDEO:: NOT THE SOLUTION FACTOR. WHY? Tom Flocco of www.tomflocco.com  was a regular guest on these three so-called-talk-show-hosts-programs in the past until Tom Flocco began writing articles with documents and evidence in 2005. 

Now these three will not put the truth out by Tom Flocco. WHY? 

Beware and ask questions, keep your eyes and ears open. 

Remember Bushes own and control most of the TV, Media, and Radio programming in America. Identify The Enemy of The American Revolution.

www.stewwebb.com

_________________________________________________

NOT EVERYTHING POSTED ON THE INTERNET IS TRUE YOU BE THE JUDGE.

  Karl Schwartz information posted on the world wide web.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

www.yayacanada.com/9-11-4e.html 

www.yayacanada.com/9-11-4d.html

Karl Schwarz forwards to YayaCanada
his email debate with 911 Team 8+
... to which "Madame Karnak" adds her comments
See: Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son
See new Download page - more supporting documents have been added along with additional notes from "Madame Karnak"

See also: Reader comments

Update: June 6/05 - Karl Schwarz still being grilled by 9-11 researchers at Portland Indymedia.  Scroll down to the update at the bottom.  There don't seem to be many answers forthcoming.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 1:48 PM
Subject: FW: response to Portland Indy Media and Nico Haupt

Hello Corinne,

The following should be self-explanatory.

Karl

YYC:  Well, actually it isn't so much.  The author of Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son has added a few relevant notes which you will see in this colour text below.  Wherever she mentions documents, she has sent me digital copies of those documents, and if anyone wishes to see them, please email me and I will forward them to you.


From: Karl W B Schwarz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:58 AM

Subject: response to Portland Indy Media and Nico Haupt

Hello Nico,

Have addressed your questions below, and remove me from this web ring when you are done reading. I have better things to do than carry on this pointless debate and no more emails will be read or answered from this group of time wasters.  

First off I will address the Portland Indy Media posting and demonstrate the irrelevance and inaccuracy of most of this researcher’s alleged findings.  

The Portland Indy Media post is a partially the work of plagiarism in that Kelly Ann Thomas of Texas had typed most of this before and placed it on her website.  She then retracted it all after we began direct communications.

http://karmakat.typepad.com/picasso_dreams/2004/10/teh_real_karl_s.html
-------------------------
Everything about Schwarz, not everyone wants to know....
 9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?
wild ties from US Defense Communications Agency (DCI) to Israeli Air Force

-------------------------
Response: Have not at any time in the past or present had anything to do with DCI or Israeli Air Force.  This person is reaching to create controversy out of nothing.
----------------------------
NOTE: Karl did spend time in ROTC in high school or college, but nothing indicates that he has the personality or background for DCI or Mossad. Did search service record database on Net Detective, but no Karl W Schwarz listed anywhere.
-------------------------------
1) The Karl Schwarz- Karl Schwarz connection

Is Karl Schwarz connected with the personality of german Karl Schwarz?
Schwarz (US) insisted, it's not him.

German Karl Schwarz is interestingly a turbine specialist as well and involved with Lockheed test flights.
 http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRH0110/FR0110d.htm

---------------------
Response:  Absolutely no connection whatsoever.  The German Karl Schwarz was actually connected to Lufthansa and their Lockheed aircraft, more so than Lockheed.  It would help if “read” and “pay attention” were in the same breath.

Just because two people have the same name does not a conspiracy make.  There is also a Karl Schwarz brewery in Austria, Karl Schwarz MD and Karl Schwarz theologian, all, no relationship whatsoever to me.
----------------------
 NOTE:  NO CONNECTION FOUND.
---------------------------------
2) Schwarz mirrored number

His public telephone number, is still listed as 501-663-4959,
but already since last year belonging to someone named Robbie W Dickson - (501) 663-4959
--------------------------
Response:  Has not been my telephone number for quite some time.  Any researcher worth a penny would know that Robbie W. Dickson is my mother’s re-married name and that I have a half-brother with the last name of Dickson.  Wow, what a researcher.   My telephone is AC 770.  See if this genius can figure it out since such inaccuracy is assured to prove nothing on 9-11.
----------------------------
NOTE:  NOT TRUE.  Karl gave this number out on the GlobalAXXESS, COMMAXXESS websites that were set up with a copyright of 1999 through 2002. This number is listed on emails referring to Global Crossing stuff in 2002. He made calls from that number as late as 2003/4. It was listed on his emails.  Robbie Dickson is owner of phone and that is confirmed in directory search PDF.  His use of this number on the websites is confirmed with PDF of site page listing number
------------------------------
3) Schwarz unregistered companies

Commaxxess, Inc. which was in alleged negotiations on assets from Global Crossing, had their website at a free host
-------------------------------
Response:  COMMAXXESS, Inc. was quite registered, in Delaware and offshore.  Shoddy research to have not known that, or focus on just one state or one nation.  “Rank Amateur” comes to mind.  COMMAXXESS never shared a website with GlobalAxxess.  GlobalAxxess is the former global VAR of UUNet, only global VAR of 15 VARs allowed by UUNet.  The website used to redirect to a UUNet / GlobalAxxess joint site but that ended when the relationship did.  When WorldCom purchased UUNet, we were already aware of the fraud going on inside of WCOM and changed names to distance our IP-centric activities from WCOM and what was headed their way.

This “researcher” is to me obviously myopic and not very thorough, or does not understand business structure and relationships that have nothing to do with 9-11.
-----------------------------
NOTE: It is never a good idea to patronize, particularly when one is unsure of the knowledge level of the patronizee.  GlobalAxxess, Commaxxess, etc. both names are currently available from the state of Delaware indicating that these charters have been revoked or gone unpaid.

The Bank of Antigua, where both were supposed to have their monies is a tiny bank with how much in deposits?  Well, if Mr. Schwarz has collected the “billions” that he says that he has, one would expect the bank of Antiqua to have deposits in the billions.  They have only about $158 million.
 
Please see statements in PDF from Commaxxess / GlobalAXXESS sites.  These confirm “billions of dollars”  Even purchase price offered for Global Crossing was $800 million or so.  How was that going to be paid from a bank whose assets are only $158 million?

Searches (in pdf) in UTAH, NEVADA, ALABAMA, DELAWARE and ARKANSAS confirm that there are vacated or revoked registrations in Delaware and Arkansas for GlobalAXXESS, possibly commaxxess, but all names are available to reserve which means that the charters are revoked.  There are no registrations in any of the other states.  While other states could be searched, the states preferred by investment bankers and large corps are NEVADA and DELAWARE due to their favorable tax treatments

----------------------------------------------------------
Corporation Name GLOBALAXXESS, LLC.
 http://globalaxxess.net.tripod.com/

-----------------------------------------
Response:  We used a remote domain host away from our main servers because of WCOM attempts to hack into our customer base.  Irrelevant, meaningless research by this person and drawing ludicrous assumptions.
-----------------------------------------
NOTE: THIS SUGGESTS THAT WORLDCOM IS CONDUCTING TERRORIST ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED BY LAW.  ALL KARL HAD TO DO IS TO PHONE THE FBI AND IT WOULD HAVE GONE AWAY.  WHOIS searches confirm that the owners of Globalaxxess.com are in Canada.  They have been sent an email to ask if they know Karl Schwarz.  Chances are, they will reply “No.”  The domain name and that of Commaxxess are for sale which is a real interesting way to establish a brand name---sell core identity items to somebody else.
------------------------------------
From researcher "Tradermule", November 2004:

"GlobalAxxess claims in its comments that it recently made an offer to the United States Trustee and to counsel for the Official llnsecured Creditors
Committee. GlobalAxxess Cmts., at 3. Applicants are not aware of
any such offer. Moreover, as discussed above, the Bankruptcy Court concluded that the Proposed Transaction represents the best offer to GCL and issued a Sale Order approving the Proposed Transaction. Issues
regarding other bids are properly directed to the Bankruptcy Court, not the Commission."

---------------------------
Response:  The attorneys for the secured creditors – the ones that were in control of the bankruptcy, was Milbank Twead, NYC, specifically Allan Brilliant and Diedre Sullivan.  Met with them on several occassions [Chase Plaza, lower Manhattan] regarding the higher offer, $415 million cash, $400 million per year over 5 years.  Offer was presented to US Trustee, Secured and Unsecured Creditors.  Tradermule’s “findings” are not close to accurate.  It was a 282 page document prepared by bankruptcy counsel for the acquisition of Global Crossing assets in bankruptcy.

If this person “Tradermile” had taken the time to read “One-Way Ticket to Crawford, TX” they would have known all about it in chapters 12-14.  Again, shoddy, half done research that is totally irrelevant to 9-11.

The only offer ever submitted by Global Crossing to the court was the lowest offer, no due diligence.  This person needs to read One Way Ticket to Crawford Texas to understand why that happened and why “high bid with due diligence” was something feared by Global Crossing and many of their main Wall Street creditors.  Part of the NWO you fear is they needed a global financial network owned by the banks, i.e. Global Crossing.
------------------------------------
NOTE:  Press releases from Williams Communications suggest that they did not consider the GlobalAXXESS offer to be credible.  Email addresses of the persons referenced on the site cannot be located on the web.  Phone calls to the trustees on the case, lawyers for other plaintiffs (who were against the sale to GC) and people connected to Williams group gleaned a strong current of skepticism as to the viability of the GlobalAxxess offer.

In addition, Williams Comm stockholders called the GlobalAxxess offer “stockholder and union wetdream” and pointed out that the agreement suggested activities that violated pension and labor agreements and therefore could not be pursued without addressing those issues.  None of these issues were ever discussed in the documentation that the researcher has seen.

--------------------------------------
Pg 5, note 8
at:  http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6513387091

They weren't aware because there was no such offer.  There are no billions. GlobalAxxess was nothing but an empty registration in Arkansas.

----------------------------------------
Response:  Another erroneous assumption.  There are hundreds of documents filed on this website that expose the entire Global Crossing scam.  GlobalAxxess was a dba of a much larger holding co that raised $1.6 billion offshore.  The parent entity is domiciled in Germany.  As a VAR of UUNet, that became owned by WCOM, we kept our distance while still doing business offshore.  We were never a US VAR of UUNet and looking in the US for a Global VAR is amateurish.

GlobalAxxess was from inception a subsidiary and was merely registered in the U.S.  Nothing even remarkable about that, except some that love to waste their time and others.  GlobalAxxess ceased doing business under that name in June 2003, so continuation of the registration was meaningless.    It was registered in many other places than Arkansas.  Revoked in the context showed below means the registration was not “renewed”, paid for to be extended another year.  Very simple process, either pay and renew or let it lapse because it is not needed, not used.

Had this person read the book I wrote, the pointlessness of their post would be evident.  The proof of funds was faxed to the White House on request; that is in the book I wrote as well.

My divorce was in 2002, business interests moved out of Arkansas or, kept out of Arkansas and in some instances out of the U.S.

One of the things to watch out for in bankruptcy cases are the “penny stock whores”.  With a handle like “Tradermule”, might be one of those types of vultures.  They do not like anyone who stands up for the shareholders as I did.  Relevant information would be to find out if Tradermule is this type of person for they are quite sleazy.
--------------------------------------------
NOTE:  PLEASE SEE COMMENT ABOUT ANTIGUA BANK ABOVE.  SECONDLY, REFER TO PDF THAT SHOWS THAT IN 2002, THE SAME YEAR THAT GLOBALAXXESS LLC WAS ATTEMPTING TO PURCHASE GLOBALCROSSING, UUNET OBTAINED A JUDGMENT OF 2 MILLION DOLLARS AGAINST KARL SCHWARZ.  PDF WITH ARKANSAS BUSINESS TIMES ARTICLE IS ENCLOSED.

IT IS UNWISE TO CALL OTHER PEOPLE SLEAZY WHEN THAT SHOE MIGHT JUST AS EASILY FIT THE NAME-CALLER’S FOOT.

--------------------------------------------
Corporation Name GLOBALAXXESS, LLC.
Fictitious Names N/A
Filing # 100183720
Filing Type Limited Liability Company
Filed under Act Domestic LLC; 1003 of 1993
Status Revoked 12/31/2002
Principal Address

Reg. Agent T.B. PATTERSON, JR.

Agent Address 310 WEST SAINT LOUIS AVENUE

HOT SPRINGS, AR 719134406
Date Filed 04/10/2000
Officers N/A
Foreign Name N/A
Foreign Address

State of Origin
N/A

http://www.sos.arkansas.gov/corps/search_corps.php?
DETAIL=96920&corp_type_id=&corp_name=
globalaxxess&agent_search=&agent_city=&agent_state=&filing_number=&cmd=

Who is T B Patterson, you ask? Well, he must be some hotshot corporate lawyer! Nope.... put him in the Arkansas search engine...

6 records found

Name City State Status
DATACOM SYSTEMS, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Good Standing
GLOBAL INTEGRATED, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked
GLOBALAXXESS, LLC. HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked
INVESTOR TRUST ORGANIZATION HOT SPRINGS AR Good
Standing
MILLENNIUM MARKETING, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Not Current
iNET DIGITAL VIDEO CORPORATION HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked

Corporation Name iNET DIGITAL VIDEO CORPORATION
Fictitious Names N/A
Filing # 100184670
Filing Type For Profit Corporation
Filed under Act Dom Bus Corp; 958 of 1987
Status Revoked 12/31/2002
Principal Address

Reg. Agent T.B. PATTERSON, JR.

Agent Address 310 WEST SAINT LOUIS AVENUE

HOT SPRINGS, AR 719134406
Date Filed 05/02/2000
Officers MARILYN M. SCWARZ, President
T.B. PATTERSON, JR., Secretary

Foreign Name N/A
Foreign Address

State of Origin N/A
----------------------------------------
Response:  This person missed over 30 entities, but then focusing on Arkansas when business interests are in other states, other countries is quite the waste of time.  T. B. Patterson, Jr. lives in South Carolina, not Arkansas.  I live in GA, not Arkansas.  Very shoddy research, but then maybe half-baked assumptions is the point of such “researchers”.  Sure have not proven anything on 9-11.
----------------------------------------
NOTE:  TB PATTERSON JR LIVES IN ARKANSAS.  THIS FACT WAS CONFIRMED BY ATTORNEYS FROM THAT AREA AND THE FACT THAT TB PATTERSON HAS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION (CORPORATION FOR PROFESSIONALS) IN ARKANSAS.  WHILE I COULD DO A DIRECTORY SEARCH, IT WILL SHOW THIS SAME DATA, I AM QUITE CONFIDENT.
---------------------------------------
Despite the misspelling, we suspect that Marylin M. Scwarz is Marilyn Moody
Schwarz....

------------------------------
Response:  Former Wife, we divorced in 2002 and divorce was granted to me.  Reason, none of anyone’s business but ours.  “Suspect?”  Big deal, totally irrelevant.  Her name was Marilyn McDougald Schwarz, not Marilyn Moody Schwarz.  Again, shoddy research.
--------------------------------
 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:SqqFPU71_FcJ:courts.state.ar.us/opinions/
1996a/960918/ca94-695.wpd+&hl=en

"...In March 1976, Karl Schwarz and his wife, Lois Love Schwarz, purchased Lot 11 of the Hilltop Manor Addition in Little Rock (Lot 11) as tenants by the entirety. In January 1985, the Schwarzes separated, Karl Schwarz moved out of the home, and a divorce action was filed. In the resulting divorce decree dated September 12, 1985, Karl Schwarz was ordered to quitclaim his interest in the marital home to Lois Schwarz, who later resumed using her maiden name of Lois Love. He did not do so....."

(Love, Arkansas style.)

-------------------------------------
Response:  Had this person been “transparent” and not self-serving, they would have admitted that the issue before the Arkansas Supreme Court was the forgery of my name on deeds.  They would also have admitted to all of you readers that I won, the lower court was reversed and remanded, we filed criminal charges against the attorney who forged my name and he killed himself the next day.

Shoddy reporting by Portland Indy Media in not letting you know that I won the issue and proved the forgery.

Under Arkansas law, chancellors have only three choices regarding marital property – the man buys out the wife interest in home, she buys him out, or the home is sold, equity split.  I was ordered to sign a quitclaim deed and refused, my right WITHIN THE LAW.  They forged my name, we proved that too.
-----------------------------------
NOTE:  I am enclosing the court cases in PDF.  I can find more on PACER or Findlaw, but it seems redundant.  The facts speak for themselves.  It is easier to just read the cases and draw one’s own conclusion, but based on the cases and the appeal, these last few statements don’t seem at all correct.  I can check into the attorney who killed himself, but it will more than likely reflect that he DIED OF A HEART ATTACK, not suicide.  The judge clearly addresses the issue of why Karl was not sent to jail for disobeying a court order to quitclaim in the case paperwork.  This seems in contradiction to the statement that this was “my right WITHIN THE LAW.”  Obviously, if the judge could order it so, it was not a right of Karl’s being abrogated.
-------------------------------------
Where else is Karl Schwarz, you ask? Well you might...
 
 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8_1lrJlGNm4J:courts.state.ar.us/
opinions/1996a/961028/96-458.wpd+&hl=en

-----------------------------------
Response:  We recovered our money lost due to the forgeries from another source.  These parties were held not liable.  
-------------------------------------
And...

 http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions152/Opinions/Schwarz_v_Principal_Mutual300.pdf

--------------------------------------
Response:  This was a RICO trial that was not allowed to go to trial.  Only cost me $89.45 million, some place this “researcher” will never be in his or her life.
-----------------------------------------
NOTE: RICO IS SELDOM OR NEVER enforced by judges at a district level for the simple reason that judges at that level don’t want to be interpreting federal law and applying it to local citizens or their peers.  RICO cases also require the following 4 characteristics to be certified under the statutes. (18 USC 1963)

1.    There must be a threat of bodily harm or bodily harm must have occurred. (No mention of bodily harm is in the documents in any of the court proceedings in Maryland or AR)
2.    Extortion or coercion must be implied or inferred by the plaintiff
Bribery of officials must be involved. (check
the statute for definitions of bribery) (It is not clear who would have been bribed in either the case tried in Maryland or the case tried PRO SE in Arkansas)  
4.    There cannot be single actors in RICO.  The issues must arise from an organized criminal activity (organized means that there are several people involved with clearly defined roles who have worked together on previous occasions.  The GSA is known for a lot of things, but racketeering is not one of them.  Since it appears to have been Karl who brought everyone together, Karl would have to have been the Kingpin and been pulling such stunts off regularly. Since, in the last three years, he had to borrow money to survive, it is doubtful that he was running a successful criminal enterprise.  Also, if HE were the RICO nominee, he would be suing himself

NOTE:  PDFs of one case are included.  The other case is available from PACER  

---------------------------------------
 Well, what of Karl's multi-billion dollar "telecom" company?

 http://members.tripod.com/eCapbank/

Well, sure... all multi-billion dollar companies use free tripod webpages and an AT&T account e-mail address, don't they? It's the growing trend in worldwide companies.

The phone number and residental listing has not changed. It was the same back on the Yahoo! GX board where his "assistant" with the ID "barecreek" explained that it was his "Mom's number". (go figure)  Don't take my word... call him up there. Just be careful.... if you leave your hat on the table, Karl will sell it to you.

-----------------------------
Response:  changed long ago, seems this person cannot follow chronology at all.  Anne Melo, senior executive assistant to me for 6 years, now lives in Canada.  Cannot call me at that number, but then “FACTS” are not this persons point or forte.  My AC is 770, not 501
-----------------------------------------
What you can't find is a physical address for any of his "multi-billion corporations". It has since disappeared from the web but the only address back then "GlobalAxxess Holdings, Inc. Attn: Mr. W. Gregg Almand, General Counsel 11101 Anderson Drive, Suite 203 Little Rock, AR 7221.2"
-------------------------------------
Response:  The IP servers were in Little Rock.  The company was based offshore so looking in AR was a waste of time. There were dual Juniper M-160s and dual Juniper M-20 routers.   You Inspector Gadgets can figure out on your own how much capacity such units have and can handle.

This person obviously has a myopia regarding Arkansas, and that is not where the company was based.  Where I live and where I have business interests are not necessarily the same.   Only a fool would draw such conclusions.  For example, I live in GA, business is SC based, plant is in VA and more coming in South America, Europe and Canada later this year.  Only an amateur like this purported “9-11 investigator” was make such ludicrous connections that do not exist and assumptions that show his intent to twist the truth.

Maybe Gerard can figure out where our offices were outside of Sydney.

Maybe this Portland Indy Media person can figure out where in Singapore, LA, NYC and London, or in Budapest, the other network hubs were located.  If my competitors could not, doubt this Indy Media person or Nico Haupt can figure it out.

If they can figure that out, prêtty good at research.  If not, they need to go back to whatever it was they were doing before 9-11 for they will never prove or be constructive in the 9-11 prosecution matters.
--------------------------------------------
Gregg seems to have moved but back then you could find him thus:
 
 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:Y3B7AUH_0l4J:
www.lawnetar.com/main.htm+William+G.+%22Gregg%22+Almand
+Representing+people+with+legal+problems+such+as+Automobile
+Accidents,+Accidental+Injuries,+Defective+or+Dangerous+Products,
+Business+Disputes,+Commercial+Litigation,+Victims+of+Fraud,+Divorce,
+Collection+of+Child+Support,+Child+Custody,+Other+Matters+involving
+Children,+Contract+Disputes,+Small+Businesses,+Wills+and+Probate,
+and+most+other+legal+matters.+I+do+not+take+criminal+cases,+bankruptcy,
+or+tax+cases,+but+I+can+refer+these+questions+and+cases+to+lawyers
+who+do+practice+in+these+areas+of+the+law.&hl=en

----------------------------------------
Response:  Gregg Almand has not worked with us since early 2001.  Dated information and nothing to do with 9-11 or me.
---------------------------------------
There was plenty more at the time but it all comes to the same thing. Kark W B Schwarz is nothing but a lying Arkansas con man. I will admit that I've never quite cottoned to his exact game but I know a liar when I see one.
-------------------------------------
Response:  Sure sounds like slander to me.  Will have my attorneys address this one.  I underwent a full FBI investigation in 1999-2000 due to Clinton and the FBI did not find what this person alleges.  This alleged “9-11 researcher” that could not solve a Girl Scout cookie scam, much less 9-11 or anything regarding me.

Nothing I do is questionable unless people try to spin half baked ideas like this debate has been.
---------------------------------------------
Be careful out there.... particularly when they are saying what you want to hear.
--------------------------------------------
Response:  Yes, be careful of sham investigators that cannot follow any trail or use critical thinking.  Just another coward behind a keyboard that did not even identify him or her self.
-------------------------------------------
NOTE:  See notes on bank, see notes about borrowed money.  There are 68 creditors who should be paid if Karl has the money that he claims, because they lost their proverbial “tushies” in the slackwater harbor debacle of the 80s.  It is difficult to reconcile his account with the fact that UUnet won a judgement against him in 2002.  Surely, he would have paid that to keep his reputation intact and the company going?????

No indication that there was a connection between Karl and Clinton or Karl’s ex-wife and Clinton at all.  None of the Paula Jones trial or Starr investigation include anyone fitting the description, employment or other attributes of Marilyn McDougald Moody Schwarz.

------------------------------------------

PS: Crap! I almost forgot. Where is T. B. Patterson, the hotshot corporate lawyer? He's at
310 W. St. Louis Hot Springs, AR 71913
Right between the dentist:
(501) 624-3323. Beebe John C DDS. 308 W Saint Louis
St. Hot Springs, AR
and the doctor:
Thomas Wallace A MD 312 W Saint Louis St Hot Springs
501-624-1204

(that was so a year and a half ago, at least.... you can check the current ones next to the big time corporate lawyer in a dinkshit one man practice)

-----------------------------------------
Response:  Do something productive.  Wrong again.  T. B. Patterson’s office is in South Carolina, does not live in Hot Springs, AR.  If this person cannot figure out simple things, what are they doing in the 9-11 investigation?
---------------------------------------
NOTE:  I CAN CALL T.B. PATTERSON IN HOT SPRINGS OR LITTLE ROCK TO CONFIRM HIS WHEREABOUTS.  SURELY, HE KNOWS WHERE HE IS???? OTHER ATTORNEYS HAVE VERIFIED THAT HE IS IN ARKANSAS.
---------------------------------------
4) The GlobalAxxess.net -Chiaro connection

From researcher Brad M. (team8plus.org):

11-15-01 (Karl Schwarz') GlobalAxxess.net announces that Chiaro Networks photonics core router technology will be tested in GlobalAxxess hubs starting in mid 2002.  This technology is scalable to 1.5 petabits per second and switching speeds of 5 nanoseconds.

http://members.tripod.com/eCapbank/id24.htm

So Karls whole big business depends on these guys...

------------------------------------------
Response:  Wrong again, but then what’s new with this investigator that looks at everything backwards.  Maybe that is the purpose of his/her post. I am getting a very clear picture why you folks and your “research team” are getting nothing accomplished on 9-11.
--------------------------------------
Meet Chiaro...
http://www.chiaro.com/about/our_investors.jsp
http://www.chiaro.com/
networking, supercomputing, telecommunications and photonics.
Address: 5 Nahum Hefzadi St.
Jerusalem
ISRAEL, 95484
Telephone: 02-6595539
www.matimop.org.il/newrdinf/company/c2485.htm

-------------------------------------------
Response:  This person conveniently leaves off the controlling US investors in Chiaro and attempts to characterize it as an Israel controlled company, which it is not.
-------------------------------------------
From researcher ewing2001 (team8plus.org) :
Founder of Chiaro was Dr. Eyal Shekel, in 1997.
A former captain in the Israeli Air Force
 http://www.israelseed.com/portfolio/port_det.asp?id=1

Chiaro is a portfolio company of Pitango.
Their contact info 5 Nahum Hefzadi St.,
Headquarters:
269 West Renner Parkway
Richardson, Texas 75080 USA

---------------------------------
NOTE:  CHIARO WAS CONTACTED IN RICHARDSON.  THEY HAVE YET TO ACKNOWLEDGE A RELATIONSHIP OF ANY KIND WITH KARL W.B. SCHWARZ, PATMOS, GLOBALAXXESS…ETC., ETC.
---------------------------------
Response:  Pitango (formerly Polaris) was and is a minority stake holder of Chiaro.  The Chiaro company is controlled by US investors, albeit Jewish for the most part but more so TEXAS.
----------------------------------
http://www.pitango.com/portfolio_company.asp?ID=63
http://www.pitango.com/team_member.asp?ID=24
Rami Kalish of Chiaro once founded Polaris in 1993, the year of WTC attack No.1   Polaris was later renamed into Pitango.

---------------------------------
Response:  Chiaro, Pitango, 1993 founding and 9-11 have nothing at all to do with each other.  Most of the Chiaro executives worked for Alcatel in the 1990s. Maybe this person needs to discern the difference between Zionist and Jew, and the difference between 1993, 2001 and right now, 2005.
--------------------------------
Polaris however was the result of a Israeli Government Initiative:
http://vcexperts.com/vce/news/buzz/archive_view.asp?id=2594/12/2005
Dr. Shlomo Kalish & Micah Avni,
Jerusalem Global Ventures

"...The industry, however, was formed in the early 90s and boosted by a government initiative called Yozma, which subsidized foreign LPs to invest in Israeli funds. Several funds were formed, including Polaris (now renamed Pitango), Gemini, Nitzanim (now called Concord), Star Ventures, Oxton (now called JVP), and others...

Managing Partner of Pitango was Nechemia Peres, "who is also the chairman of the Israeli Venture Capital Association, and son to former prime minister, Shimon Peres..."

-----------------------------------------
Response:  This “investigator” finally got something right.  We stayed arm’s length from any involvement with Israel because of their spying on the US and using core router and telecom switch software to do it.   We have never had anything to do with the Israel parties in any manner.

BGPs and ASICs of Chiaro were certified by our people to have no back doors for Israeli intelligence gathering by our code writers and core router specialist.  If you folks do not know what BPG and ASIC are, educate yourselves for I do not have time to do that.

Have never met him, never talked to Peres, do not know him.
---------------------------------------
Another Director of Chiaro in Richardson, Texas is Jon Bayless. (funding of company was started in March 1997)

Bayless was previously with Arthur A. Collins, Inc., Defense Communications Agency, E-Systems and Motorola.

-----------------------------------------
Response:  Bayless was not involved in anything we did with Chiaro.  Again, nothing to do with 9-11 whatsoever.
----------------------------------------

The founder of Arthur A. Collins was a high tech radio- and avionics specialist.
 http://www.wa3key.com/aacbio.html

He received the Secretary of the Navy's Distinguished Public Service Award Citation in 1962, the Iowa Broadcasters Association Distinguished Service Award in 1966, was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 1968, received the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association's David Sarnoff Award in 1979, and the Electronics Industries Association's Medal of Honor in 1980.

-------------------------------------------
Response:  Totally irrelevant and no relationship with us, our company or me.
-------------------------------------------
Since recently Chiaro has the following products:

The Enstara IP/MPLS platform and some router softwares like ChiarOS
Among their investors is still Pitango, Israel Seed Partners, Siemens and
others.

---------------------------------------------
Response:  and Sevin Rosen, the controlling partners.  Amazing what this person keeps leaving out and trying to spin a bogus tapestry.  If this person is going to do homework, they need to learn to complete the assignment.  Israelis do not control Chiaro.  The Israeli physicist invented one component of the Chiaro core routers, Dr. Eyal Shekel.  The rest of it was invented in the US.
 
We are currently making such technology even better through nanotechnology and photonics.

By the way, military service in Israel is mandatory so do not make too much of anyone’s past in Israel being military related. Somewhat naïve to make assumptions that have no basis in fact or stretch things into something they are not.
---------------------------------------------
On January 3, 2005 it was confirmed, that Israel Seed Partners start-up MobileAccess will install an US House of Representatives communications system
http://www.israelseed.com/press/pressroom_detail.asp?id=259

---------------------------------------------
Response:  Israel Seed Partners held less then 10% of Chiaro.  The larger VC firms were US based including Sevin Rosen, the firm that bailed out Compaq years ago.  Minority partners were not controlling Chiaro in any manner, nor were Israeli interests.  We had the same concerns before deciding to do business with them.  

Now, I will address Nico’s questions:
------------------------------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Denunciation of schwarz
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nico Haupt
 
...in my compilation I point on Schwarz' connections to -US Defense Communications Agency

-----------------------------------
Response: None whatsoever Nico, then or now.
-----------------------
Israeli Air Force
------------------------
Response: None whatsoever Nico, then or now.
--------------------------
-Israeli Venture Capital
------------------------------------------
Response: None whatsoever Nico, then or now.
-------------------------------------
Nechemia Peres, son to former prime minister, Shimon Peres
-----------------------------------------
Response: None whatsoever Nico, then or now.
 
If you are this far off base on “facts” regarding me, how far off are you on 9-11?  I am German descent, very anti-Zionist.  Not popular in Israel at all Nico.
---------------------------------------------
Schwarz was formerly married to someone named "Lois Love".
come to your own conclusions :)

----------------------------------------------
Response: Funny Nico, maybe we need to discuss your “problem” and why you bash, trash and slash anyone who disagrees with your research.   “Denunciation of Schwarz?”  Would it be fair of me to lay out all that I know about you, or more correctly, all I have been told about you?  That would not be fair, would it?
 
Her name is Lois Jean Love, her maiden name; not a bogus name in any manner.  Is Nico Haupt a bogus name?   We were married for 11 and a half years.  She is the mother of my only child, Ryan Matthew Schwarz, Cpl, Arkansas National Guard 39th Infantry Brigade, attached to 1st Cavalry Division, Baghdad, just returned 8 weeks ago from Iraq.
 
Want to be concerned about something relevant?  The attack plan for Iran was being done in Baghdad, ready to implement any time.
----------------------------
 --- Nico Haupt wrote:
My "answer" was already posted some weeks ago on
IMC:
 
9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?
 
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/05/316680.shtml
 
Schwarz is not credible, until he explains all subversive and odd connections and changes his political, secretive and diversive message.

--------------------------------
Response: In all due respect Nico, your credibility dipped with me with your posts all over the Internet based on nothing.   I have no subversive or odd connections whatsoever other than what you folks are dreaming up out of nothingness.  A relationship with a company or technology does not translate into a relationship with the investors who created the technology or the company.  If you think it does, you need a reality check or just showing off your naivety
 
You folks have no subpoena powers, no position to demand anything of me, period.  Do your own research.
 
Gerard, if you want the link for the 115 foot wing span 737, find it yourself.  I do not work for you.  It is there.  If you cannot find it, that is your problem.  Also, not everything is “linked” on the Internet.  Assuming it is shows your naivety.
 
Only fools believe everything they read.  Shows a lack of discernment and lack of critical thinking.
---------------------------------------
PS:  I was yesterday with Tom Flocco 2 hours on the phone. I explained my points. He also wouldn't "vote" for any presidental candidate, coz elections are rigged.  He promised me to get back to Schwarz and confront him with our research on Schwarz.
 
Meanwhile Schwarz' spin seems also to arrive at Griffin. His source on so called "Newsday" reporter with "50 government witnesses" smacks like a relaunched schwarz-story. If everyone knows, if Newsday-source is different from Schwarz, lemme know.

----------------------------------------
Response:  NY Newsday reporter and myself talked at length Friday.  Our sources will decide on their own if they wish to talk to him.  Actually about 150 govt whistleblowers and persons that have pieces of the puzzle; FAA, FBI, NSA, CIA, DoD, DIA, Customs, DoJ, etc.
 
You folks need to watch for Tom Flocco’s next article.  Might learn something, including what a waste of time your recent rants are.  One of the documents we delivered to Spitzer’s office was part of a Naval Intel file.
-------------------------------------------
 
As long as it doesn't spin out of control, i'll put my name to it.
 
Jeff

-------------------------------------------
Response:  Your entire group, Jeff, spins out of control.  Loose with facts, twisting things around into something they never were, self-serving to keep bad research alive and not just a little paranoid.  Spinning webs of nothingness out of nothingness is a sure sign.
------------------------------------------
on 5/26/05 3:59 PM, Gerard Holmgren wrote:
 
I get the impression that there are many of us who agree that Schwarz lacks credibility and needs to be cut down to size.
 
That at best he's a cynical opportunist and self promoter with appalling research standards - in fact its not even bad research, its just empty spin.
 
At that at worst he's actively working for the cover up.
 
If there are enough of us, I suggest an open letter, published on IMC, which we all put our names to, putting in blunt terms what we think of Schwarz and his crackpot theories and swaggering self promotion....

--------------------------------------
Response: Actually Gerard, it is your group that lacks credibility with the “hologram” and then “no plane” theories.  That is not according to me, that is according to 911truth.org board members.
 
You do not even bother to find out the “3” platforms that use JT8D engines, one of which is single engine, 48’ wing span more or less depending on source.  Yeah, typo moron and was discussing background of what types of US military craft, rocket or jet, could have been used.  Only one that has two engines under the wings is the A-3 Skywarrior.
 
It is you Gerard that lacks credibility.  You are still a keyboard coward and your demands are falling on deaf ears.  Do your own research.  There is nothing you can say or provide to get me to buy off on your hologram or no plane theories, period.  Debate you and WebFairy?  Have much better things to do with my time.
 
We are exposing them, sorry you are not doing so.  If you think I am helping the cover up, you are not paying attention or not grasping reality.
--------------------------------
[[They even have AIM 100 lasing devices and can light up targets up to 30 miles in all directions fro air strikes, artillery, mortar, or helicopters to dispose of problems...]]
------------------------------------------------
Response: Our military is blind on the ground with very little in the way of aerial visual gathering assets.  Our systems were to find people burying IEDs, snipers, weapons trafficking, etc.  Even after being in Iraq for a year, US Army only controlled 50% of the munitions dumps where the bombs were being picked up to use against our soldiers.  Another Bush oversight and evidence of lack of caring.
 
Spin it any way you wish Gerard, you show your ignorance and your ass each time you do.  The death toll would have been much lower had they deployed our systems in February 2004 as planned.
 
You twist and spin well, sure signs of a disinfo person, which is why I do not cooperate with you by the way.
 
Karl,
-----------------------------------------------------
according to Janice Matthews (911truth.org) recently this filmmaker claimed, his footage was altered.  Unfortunately he didn't come forward yet or was Matthew's source in any way confirmed yet.
 
How do you respond on that?
 
nico
 
PS: Hope, you will have soon have a chance to respond on my earlier questions. Maybe you have time to answer them on notebook and then paste into your email-program.

----------------------------------------------
Response: I spoke to Janice after receiving this from you Nico.  It was explained to me why you, Gerard and WebFairy are not considered credible by the 9-11Truth.org group.  
 
This photographer has seen what we have from CBC and verified that it IS what he shot.  Your post is not accurate.  He never said it was altered, so, wherever that came from is in error or intentionally lying to you.
 
You are free to believe the hologram and no plane theories.  I choose not to believe in your research, for cause, because we have facts in hand to show otherwise.
----------------------------------------------
If this were so, it would have been seen and known to 911 researchers before the CBC documentary came out.
It was not even in the extensive archive at http://terrorize.dk The chances it was broadcast but no one found it important enough to add to any of the hundreds of video archives that appeared in the aftermath of 911 is inconceivable.  Canada didn't get it's own separate coverage. The same clips went out all over the world.

---------------------------------------------
Response: That is an assumption, not necessarily a given.  It was shot by a Canadian, sold to CBC and aired only in Canada.  It was not a “private feed” as you suggest.  Some Americans in the very northern parts of NY, VT, NH, ME saw it according to some that have called or emailed us.
 
That it was used in the Cheney Hit piece is irrelevant.  It existed long before that documentary.
-----------------------------------------------
Is the Canadian that lived in Battery Park involved with video insertion technology, perhaps Princeton Video Systems? Did they work at Trinity Studios?
------------------------------------------------
Response: No, Rosalee, it first appeared on CBC all over Canada on 9-11 and 9-12-2001.
It was shot by a Canadian that lived in Battery Park, MANHATTAN  Karl
-------------------------------------------------
Nico Haupt wrote:
 
Hello Karl,
 
i'm glad, that you finally reacted.  Maybe you will take now also the chance to answer some questions, based on the compilation on you at
 
9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?
 
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/05/316680.shtml
 
1) Did you ever work as a private military or intelligence contractor for the Pentagon or CIA and would that explain, that you former companies are not properly listed in registration databases?

-------------------------------------------
Response: Never private military or intelligence contractor for Pentagon or CIA.  All of my companies are properly listed where they have to be, not where you assume them to be.
 
I am listed under SourceCan (Canada) and CCR (US).  My connections to defense and intelligence related persons are communications security based or nanotechnology, not working with the bad sides of those agencies.
----------------------------------------------
2) What happened after the negotiations of your company GlobalAxxess with Global Crossing?
---------------------------------------------
Response:       Read Chapters 12-14 of my book.  The lowest bid, no due diligence was selected over the highest bid with due diligence.  Do not have the time to educate you on why that happened, what they were covering up.  From March 2001 to end of 2003 I spent 22 weeks in Canada and 17 in NYC on business addressing securities and telecom fraud.
----------------------------------------------
3) Why was GlobalAxxess not properly listed?
---------------------------------------------
Response: GlobalAxxess was always properly listed when and where it needed to be.  It has not existed since June 2003 when it became COMMAXXESS.  That entity is listed where it needs to be and no place else.  We will be shutting it down within 12 months when contractual obligations lapse, but it will retain RICO plaintiff status.  Move on.
---------------------------------------------
4)  Did your former wife, Lois Love use a fake name, because she was related to private intelligence, too?
--------------------------------------------
Response: That is her maiden name, Lois Jean Love, not a fake name.  Whomever suggested that to you is an idiot.  Neither she nor myself “private intelligence” at any time.  Big difference in providing “intelligence security networks” and being involved in what you suggest.
 
Corinne Allan, aka yayacanada, called my ex-wife and asked her about her “drug problem”.  False, she has never had a drug problem and like me has “zero tolerance” for illegal drugs.
 
Corinne Allan also asked her about “my living with a wealthy woman”.  Hmm, I live in Alpharetta, GA and who I date lives near Baltimore 692 miles away.  We are not exactly living together and who I date as a single man is none of Corinne’s or any else’s business.
--------------------------------------------------
NOTE FROM YAYACANADA:  I DID NOT PERSONALLY CALL ANYONE.  THE CALLS WERE MADE BY THE AUTHOR OF Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son.  I DO NOT KNOW WHAT QUESTIONS WERE ASKED, ONLY WHO WAS CONTACTED AND WHAT WAS WRITTEN UP IN THE ARTICLE.
-------------------------------------------------
5) Is it correct, that your partner companies connected with
 -US Defense Communications Agency
 -Israeli Air Force
 -Israeli Venture Capital
 Nechemia Peres, son to former prime minister, Shimon Peres

---------------------------------------------------
Response: No, that is not correct.  Chiaro has not been a strategic partner since 2001.  Move on.
--------------------------------------------------
and can you explain these connections, means did you ever meet any of these related "operations"?
-------------------------------------------------
Response: No, did not even have telephone conversations with them.
-------------------------------------------------
6) Why did you decide to use "tripod" as a host for a company website?
------------------------------------------------
Response: because WCOM was nosey and trying to get into our main servers and main IP core routers.  I was not going to expend money and effort to develop marketing and sales leads for WCOM.  That website has not been used in any manner since early 2001.  Move on.
----------------------------------------------
7)  How is Marylin M. Scwarz related to you?
---------------------------------------------
Response: second wife, we divorced in 2002.  I have known her since Sept 1969.  Try to stay focused on 9-11 and relevant matters Nico.
--------------------------------------------
8) Is it correct, that T. B. Patterson worked as your divorce and business lawyer?
Can you explain, why it is very difficult to get any background information or public records on him?

------------------------------------------
Response: yes and he still does.  He lives in South Carolina, I live in GA.  We both prefer to keep people out of our personal and business affairs, which is quite legal by the way.  My nanotechnology company competes against Kellogg Brown & Root’s CNI.  Would you provide an open door to them?  What they cannot fathom, they cannot disrupt.  What they cannot fathom, neither can you.  My corporate structure and dealings are to keep people like them, and you, out of my personal and business affairs.  Quite legal is the operative phrase.
--------------------------------------------
9) Is your partner of GlobalAxxess.net, Chiaro Networks and his founder, Dr. Eyal Shekel (ex-Israeli Air Force) in any form related to business with Lockheed, Raytheon, TRW or Boeing?
-------------------------------------------
Response: No, no connection whatsoever relating to me.  Have never met the man, have never talked to him.  I am intimately familiar with the Chiaro 1.5 petabit routers that he invented a component of, a photonics optical router component.  He is a communications physicists, not Dr. Mendela.  We have had no relationship with Chiaro since 2001.  Move on.
----------------------------------------------
10) Is Jon Bayless, Director of Chiaro in Richardson, Texas, in any form related to business with FAA, NRO, NSA or NIMA/NGA?
---------------------------------------------
Response:  Do not know Jon Bayless and our involvement with Chiaro was technology related, not relationships with their board members or VC firms that financed the technology development.
----------------------------------------------
11) How can you explain a business/political conflict of interest, that the sponsor of Chiaro, "Israel Seed Partners" and his start-up MobileAccess will install an US House of Representatives communications system ?
---------------------------------------------
Response: “Political conflict of interest?”  Reaching and spinning Nico for that has nothing to do with me.  Are you paranoid?  I would have that system removed if I were in office and not allow any Israel spying on the U.S.  Recently joined a group that wants to have AIPAC declared a foreign lobby – see www.cnionline.org, I am a member.  Does that answer your question, as pointless as the question is?
--------------------------------------------
12) Are you using the campaign on revealing the "truth about 9/11" in any way as a revenge on private US military - or intelligence contractors, who sabotaged you in the past?
--------------------------------------------
Response: No, my activities are due to what they are doing to the US and the world and raising the debate up to their level until they choke on it.  I have overcome many fold what they did to me in the past.  It was what I did in the past that keeps me right in their face with the truth.  Read my book or quit asking lame questions that waste time.
 
They run from me and my team.  They laugh at you, Rosalee and Gerard.  Move on.
--------------------------------------------
13) Why do you ignore in your articles, that the official story about flight 11, 175, 77 and 93 is a LIE.  These flights either did not exist, did not depart or departed at different times, in opposite to official story.
--------------------------------------------
Response: that is your opinion, not ours.  We have FAA people that have come forward with some interesting facts.  We do not buy the official story either, but for reasons other than those your group seems to believe.
--------------------------------------------
14) Last, but not least. Why did you announce to run as president? Are you not giving people false hope, who are aware of rigged e-voting machine, furthermore why you ignore documents and plans of pending world war "4", which might even start before the next election?  Means, why you pretend, that democracy still exist, instead already replaced by fascism?  For which party do you wanna run? Is this decision really a protection strategy et... ??
--------------------------------------------
Response: No, actually people in the millions are standing up right now for the first time in a long time due to my efforts and those of others.  I have now done 2 TV shows (more coming), 111 radio shows and many more scheduled.  We will be announcing very soon an endorsement that tops 4 million people in a single group.
 
We are about to launch a plan to take back the elections.  Black Box voting had a board member at my announcement May 2. They have read the plan I developed and endorsed it once they read it.  I did let them develop the strategy for addressing the vote fraud and how to remedy that.
 
We are about to launch a 50-state plan to expose the sheer sleaze in our government at the state and federal level.
 
Fascism is the problem and we will be dealing with that head on, out on the front lines instead of these endless emails and web posts that serve no purpose.  I announced to lift this discussion up to their level, not the “waste of time” level most of the 9-11 groups are stuck on.
 
We are forming a new third party and people from all over the US are coming from all existing parties to join our effort, including DNC and RNC. This summer I speak before the Texas Constitution Party and some major Texas Libertarians have joined our movement as have many others from every state in the US.  Have people already working on VT and NH, will be traveling there soon.
 
It is not a protection strategy.  I am putting my life on the line and so are many others.   We have full time armed security being put into place at multiple sites and more being put into place very soon after that.
 
Now, Nico, quit wasting my time and letting your ego and paranoia get the best of you.

Nothing relevant in any of your questions whatsoever.  Really could not care less if you, Jeff Strahl or WebFairy support what we are doing.  As for Gerard, not a voter here any way so really do not care on that one at all.
-----------------------------------------
NOTES:  THE LAST TIME THAT AMERICANS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO “VET” THEIR CANDIDATE PROPERLY, THEY ENDED UP WITH THE EMPEROR OF THE MONKEY PALACE—GEORGE “DUBYA” SHRUBBISH II, SON OF SHRUBBISH.  ANYONE WHO RUNS FOR PRESIDENT IS ENTITLED TO MAKE MISTAKES AND BE HUMAN, BUT THEY HAVE TO BE MAN/WOMAN ENOUGH TO ‘FESS UP AND MAKE THINGS RIGHT. THEY ALSO HAVE TO EXPECT SCRUTINY, INTENSE SCRUTINY. NOBODY WANTS A REPEAT OF THE CURRENT DISASTER IF WE EVER GET THE SMIRKING CHIMP OUT OF OFFICE.

THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH FICTION IN THE INFORMATION GIVEN OUT BY KARL W. B. SCHWARZ STARTING WITH THE NAME THAT HE HAS CHANGED NUMEROUS TIMES. ABRAHAM LINCOLN WAS A HUMBLE LAWYER WHO DID NOT DO WELL IN BUSINESS, BUT HE WAS HONEST.  HONESTY IS BOTH THE LEAST AND THE BEST THAT WE DESERVE FROM OUR LEADERS.  IF THEY CAN’T TELL US THE FACTS BEFORE THEY’RE ELECTED, FAT CHANCE THAT IT WILL OCCUR AFTERWARDS.

-------------------------------------------
hope, you will respond in a proper way
 
nico aka ewing2001

---------------------------------
And to finish off, WebFairy spreading around former CIA shill Larry Lawson “nothingness:”
--------------------------------
(Again this Schwarz 'person' has fronted for PHONIES like John Stadtmiller and others.  LIKE Joyce Reilly he's had NO INTEREST in Alex Jones COINTELPRO OP against Mark Koernke!  THAT IS A BIG RED FLAG for anybody interested in the TRUTH!!  So when this story was forwarded by Tim White, I was not the least bit surprised!  I got this message from Karl below indicating he's more interested in MONEY than the TRUTH!!)

I was in Stadtmiller's studio last Wed and Thurs and we had a conf call with Alex Jones.  Do not believe everything you read - they are close friends and what is written below is way off target.

Maybe that piece is by the "OPS"?

---------------------------------
Maybe if your "checkbook" were wired to trying to get the truth to Americans your POV would change.

Karl
----------------------------------
(NO Karl it wasn't OFF TARGET and YOU are as much a FRAUD AS THEY ARE!!  I have the audio clips to PROVE IT!
Again a brief summary of what happened is in these URL's):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ctrl/message/55939
and  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/end-time-prophecies/message/14678

------------------------------------
long time ago, totally irrelevant today as to what is going on

Karl
--------------
Response:  Good for you Larry.  Listen to them and you might learn something.  Larry Lawson must be upset that John Stadtmiller will not have him on the National Intel Report.  All of the sales proceeds from my book thus far have gone to keep Stadtmiller and others on the air.  It is called “getting the truth out”, which is more than I can say for the group that assembled this nonsensical, paranoid list of mental masturbations.

Evidently Larry cannot read or grasp content – my comment was that I am spending a lot of money [MY CHECKBOOK] to get to the truth.  The truth has not made me a dime.  It is my distinct impression that Larry would not know the truth if it slapped him across the room.

Larry Lawson is a well known mis-info, disinfo, disrupter.

In summation, Nico, this entire list of useless, poorly researched facts and the questions you pose is nothing but mere gossip.

There is test for gossip.  First, is it necessary?  Secondly, is it fair? Third, is it the truth? If it cannot meet all three criteria, shut up.

I could gossip all day about what I have been told about you, Gerard, WebFairy, but then…………that would be a waste of my time.

We do not support the hologram or no plane theories.  You are free to believe whatever you wish.  Nothing you can say to make me believe your theories, so no more emails will be accepted or answered.  

This conversation is over folks.  You are not going to waste another second of my time.  If Gerard wants his link, he can find it himself.

You people are not researchers, you are time wasters.  With me, your 15 minutes are up.
 
Karl W B Schwarz

Reader comments received

Your Comment

yayacanada.com
top


yayacanada.com
Update: December 4, 2005 - Karl W.B. Schwarz has withdrawn his candidacy for the US 2008 presidential election.
See new Download page - more supporting documents have been added along with additional notes from "Madame Karnak"
See READER COMMENTS
See also: comments at Portland Indymedia
See also: Karl Schwarz caught in another lie
See also: Karl Schwarz forwards his debate with "911 Team 8+" and "Madame Karnak" adds her comments.
See Karl Schwarz's emailed responses

Editor's Note at 9-11Truth.org: "Interesting data dump on the ever entertaining Karl Schwarz. In view of the spotlight this gentleman is courting as a born-again 9/11 truth spokesman, self-styled "billionaire" and now presidential candidate, due diligence for the movement demands a look behind the curtain and you might as well start here. - Ed."

.
Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son
by "Madame Karnak"

June 2, 2005

Note from YYC: Soon after I wrote my questions about Karl Schwarz "Who is Karl Schwarz...", I was contacted by an American woman who offered to do some interviews and research and write it up for me.  The article below is the result of her considerable efforts.  I have verified the identity of this person, her address, her phone number, and even her driver's licence number, and have talked with her at length on the telephone.  Unfortunately, neither she nor anyone of the long list of sources who contributed information for this article wants to be publicly named.  They all feel that Karl Schwarz is "vindictive" and want nothing more to do with him.

The pen name she has chosen is of course a take-off on one of the late Johnny Carson's comic personae, but this woman is dead serious about the necessity to prevent Karl Schwarz from gaining any kind of leadership of the legitimate 9-11 truth movement and thus destroying its credibility.  Anyone who is interested in contacting this author about future articles (for which she will no doubt give her real name) should feel free to email me, and I will forward all requests to the author.



AMERICAN HEARTLAND---May 27, 2005—What does one call a man who has spent the greater part of his life luring people to invest in schemes that never work out? More charitable people might say that Karl was a dreamer or a Walter Mitty type.

Some might call him a grifter, others might call him a hustler and still others, a con man. Regardless, the one thing that Americans cannot afford to call him is President.  It would not be a change for the better. Very much like the current President, Karl Wilhelm Schwarz hasn’t had a successful business.  His dreams and stories have always outstripped his realities.  Unlike Dubya, Karl did not use those dreams cynically.  He believed that he could make his dreams into reality.

At least, it appears that he did in the beginning.  Karl Wilhelm Schwarz, also known as Bill Schwarz, also known more recently as Karl W.B. Schwarz, was born on May 1, 1951, to a blue collar family in Arkansas.  His father, Norris Schwarz, abandoned Karl and his two siblings, Robert and Viki, when Karl was only 9.  For weeks, the slight, blue-eyed boy sat on his porch waiting for his dad to come home.

His mother, Robbie, with the help of his grandmother, raised the three kids by herself. Much like her son, Robbie was a dreamer.  She dreamed of instant riches, compulsively gambling and squandering the family’s meager assets. Furtively borrowing from her mother’s savings earned in the local sewing factory, Robbie managed to stay just ahead of her creditors.  Finally, Robbie remarried and the family had stability for a while.

Robbie’s new husband was James Dickson.  They would have a child together, James Jr.  Karl was close to his stepfather and supported him through legal troubles that incarcerated Jim Dickson when Karl was a young man.

Exceptionally bright, and gifted with a near photographic memory, Karl learned quickly.  He attended the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville for three years, but did not graduate. Instead, anxious to get out and make money, Karl took an exam that gave him an architecture license without a diploma.

The state architect licensing board reported that: “Karl Wilhelm Schwarz was licensed as an architect in Arkansas on February 22, 1982. His license to practice in Arkansas was revoked due to failure to renew his registration July 31, 1985.  He would not be eligible to become licensed in Arkansas as an architect because Arkansas now requires a five (5) year degree in architecture.”

With his architecture license as an entrée, Karl associated himself with three other men of the firm, Turner, Dyer and Alessi.  He quickly came up with a scheme to build a “slack water harbor” in Helena, Arkansas.   For those unfamiliar with this term, “slackwater” harbors are large ditches dug from deep rivers to a specific point inland.  The idea is to give a city without a seaport, access to over water transportation.  While this might have been a great idea in the days of the mighty riverboats, it hasn’t been the big industry or tourist attraction it often is sold as.

Convinced that his idea would create a tourist attraction, generate new industry and lots of cash for everyone, Karl raised money from everybody that he knew and from anybody that anyone else knew.   Relentlessly charming and industrious, Karl persuaded his sister’s husband’s father’s friends to invest.  Member of large Italian families from New York, those friends of inlaws gave Karl about $300,000.  One hundred thousand came from local affluent families; about $200,000 came in from friends, and a trusting banker at the Worthen Bank lent Karl around $100,000.   The money went quickly.  $90,000 on a feasibility study, a salary for Karl, options on land that might be profitably developed, offices and entertainment of clients.

Even the Arkansas Times ran a story in 1983 on Karl and his amazing plan.
 
For a couple of years, things looked rosy mostly because ignorance can be bliss. Secretive by nature, Karl managed to keep his investors from discovering the disarray in the project. By 1985, it was clear that the harbor wasn’t happening. The Worthen bank called their note.

Typical of traditional Southerners, this had been a handshake deal.  When the trusting, elderly banker learned that the loan couldn’t be repaid, his heart seized.  He died. Others were ruined. They lost their savings, investment properties and their homes. Some interviewees asked that their names not be mentioned either because remembering the deal’s repercussions was too painful or because remembering how a friend fleeced them cut too deeply for words.

Within his personal life, Karl was as secretive and chaotic as his business.  Married young to Lois Love, by 1985, they had a young son, Ryan who was the apple of his mother’s eye.  Lois had problems conceiving because of her anorexia-bulimia.  When she controlled her need to purge enough to be able to conceive, she was overjoyed.  While Lois reveled in motherhood, Karl was frequently gone.  At first, he was out working investors in the slackwater harbor.  Then he took up hunting or at least that is what he told Lois although he seldom brought home any game.  Finally, it became clear that something else was going on.  Karl was hunting, but not deer.

He was pursuing a woman, Marilyn McDougald Moody.  Karl has called her  “the love of my life” to many people who have corresponded with him via email.  Lois asked Karl whether he wanted to work on their marriage or give up.  He moved out the next day.  A week or so after Karl’s departure,  Randy Lee Moody, Marilyn’s husband phoned.  He was  trying to collect on a hot check of Karl’s.  Comparing notes, Randy and Lois discovered that Karl’s “hunting trips” appeared to coincide with Marilyn’s overnight visits at girlfriends or “out of town” forays. 

Randy and Lois became friends through this difficult time.  Later they would marry and sue Karl for unpaid child support. Karl and Lois’s divorce battle turned bitter quickly.  There are over 12 years of court records reflecting the blood-soaked turf of child custody, child molestation allegations, property divisions and much more.
 
Howard Lovy’s Nanobot blog, Portland Indymedia Blog and PicassoDreams have run queries and located the voluminous court records available.  Attorneys on both sides suggest that the depositions, replete with tales of a CIA/mob connection, and various other “fantasies” were entertaining, but factually impaired.

When Karl was ordered to quitclaim a piece of property to Lois, he made out a quitclaim to an incorrect address and then attempted to unload the property by forging Lois’s name.  This resulted in another lawsuit against Karl and could have landed him in jail. But, like so many of Karl’s adventures, when admonished about the illegality of his actions, he blamed the situation on other people.

Throughout the peregrinations of fortune that Karl experienced, he failed to pay the $35 a week pittance ordered as child support.  Even when he was flush, Karl did not pay $140 a month to maintain his son.  Eventually, after the arrears reached $6,000,  Karl was sent to the county jail by a judge who called him a sociopath before sentencing him.

While in jail, a church with a fundamentalist orientation sent members to visit Karl and even lent him a car when he left.  Perhaps praying to get out of jail with these church members is where Karl began what he has described as his prison ministry in his book, “One Way Ticket to Crawford.”

For 12 years after the harbor fiasco, Karl dodged creditors and set up other businesses that failed.  In 1987, he created a “digital video business” under Marilyn Moody Schwarz’s name with Thurman B. Patterson as the only other officer.

Marilyn and her two children fared no better than Karl’s son Ryan in that he did just about as well supporting them as he did his son.  Their lives were filled with chaos and poverty. Karl and Marilyn filed for bankruptcy in1992.  The following citations of this case are taken from the PACER online federal court information system.

4:92-bk-41522 Karl Wilhelm Schwarz and Marilyn Schwarz
Case type: bk Chapter: 7 Asset: No Vol: v Judge: Mary Davies.Scott
Date filed: 06/17/1992 Date discharged: 09/15/1994

The records show that the bankruptcy was discharged near the end of 1994. Karl moved the family to Maryland to start over, but quickly became embroiled in yet another get rich quick scheme.  From what can be pieced together, Karl convinced a number of investors to pool money to lease or option an office building that the GSA indicated interest in buying.

When the GSA bought the building directly from the owner, Karl sued.  When the case was dismissed in Maryland as groundless, Karl and Marilyn returned home to Little Rock.

Again, my thanks to the blogs who have done the research. 


Back in Little Rock, Karl purchased a 5,000 square foot house in Chenal Circle that he could not make the payments on. Eventually, the utility companies turned off their electricity and water.  Karl and Marilyn lived in this huge house, bathing and washing with the water from a neighbor’s hose.  Occasionally, that same neighbor would invite them over for a hot shower. 

After much wrangling, with Karl appearing pro se (as his own attorney), the house was repossessed.  Marilyn, tired of the chaos of the “Life with Karl” daily drama, filed for divorce.
 
By 1997, things were again at rock bottom.  Karl had filed for a second bankruptcy to avoid both creditors and paying Marilyn a property settlement.  Even though she entered marriage with a house, it is not clear that she left with anything. 

Yet another victim of the Karl Express to Glory train of financial gain. Casting about for something to do, Karl became very interested in telecommunications and the Internet.  It is not clear whether he or cronies set up the e*Capbank and the GlobalAxxess sites. 

Both were part of an attempt to secure funding to take over failing telecommunications companies.  Karl intended to purchase these companies with OPM and meld them into a worldwide conglomerate with himself at the helm.  The deals failed, because despite all the effort expended (i.e. a Delaware LLC., an Arkansas corporation, an Antigua trust), Karl could not find the money to make the deals happen.

Actually, there was another problem.  Karl’s proposal to save Global Crossing violated a number of pension and other agreements.  The fact that Karl lacked the experience to run a huge conglomerate was just a little fly in the ointment compared to his finances. Throughout the 2000, 2001 and 2002, Karl worked his GlobalAxxess, Commaxxess activities.

He never acquired any of the companies that he targeted and Chiaro has not confirmed that he had any relationship with them.  There is a judgment of $2 million against Karl by UUnet.  As of this date, it is not clear whether they have any way to collect on this judgment. According to Arkansas’s Secretary of State, Department of Corporations, GlobalAxxess and Commaxxess have had their charters revoked.  In Delaware, the names for GlobalAxxess Holding Inc is available.  That’s a good indication that the state revoked the company’s charter.


When asked about how he jumped from real estate to telecommunications, Karl explained that he learned all this high finance as a broker.  A search of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) yielded no - absolutely no - license for a Karl W. Schwarz, a Karl W.B. Schwarz or derivatives thereof.

Flash forward to another Karl venture circa 2002. Reichenbach Group, LLC, a publishing company formed by T.B Patterson, would publish Karl’s book, “One Way Ticket To Crawford, Texas.”  When the book was available, the newly christened, Karl W. B. Schwarz began to make the rounds of the Internet sites relating to 9/11.


He wrote a series of articles entitled, “Pop Goes the Bush Mythology.”  Doubtless, Karl’s energetic evangelizing of this topic revealed many fundamental questions about 9/11.  It galvanized people’s interest.  Karl sold these ideas as he sold so many of his schemes.
 
Unable to resist self-aggrandizement, Karl tried to add gravity to his efforts, by portraying himself as a big player within the Republican National Committee (RNC).  A search of the FEC records at Political Money Line turned up no political contributions made by Karl Schwarz or his company Patmos.

He further embellishes his image with his claims of being the CEO of a nanotechnology firm, Patmos.  Actually, many of his trips to speak about 9/11 have had a dual purpose; he is also seeking investors for Patmos.

Interestingly enough, many of Karl’s targeted investors are women, wealthy women.  Those who have watched him in action opine that Karl’s goal is to find an extremely wealthy woman who can keep him and his dreams in the lap of the luxury that he’d like to believe he was born to. Patmos has been his vehicle for gaining access to these women. There are many of  them, too.  Deborah on the west coast, Paula in Georgia, Amy, a nurse in Canada, to name a few.

Like so many Schwarz ventures, Patmos is more idea than reality.  Searches of international and national patent databases conducted via the US Patent office yield no intellectual property under the name Patmos, Patmos Nanotechnologies, Karl W.B. Schwarz, Karl Schwarz, Carl Schwarz, Bill Schwarz or any combinations thereof.

Searches of pending patents also yield no results.  There are patents under Karl Q. Schwarz and Benjamin Schwarz, but not only do these not share the name of Patmos’ CEO, but the patents are not “assigned” to the company.  Searches of nanotechnology sites and postings left there indicate that in the small community of materials science, Karl Schwarz is not a recognized name.

In Arkansas, where Patmos is incorporated, the department of securities has never heard of Patmos, which means there are no shareholders.

So, considering that Karl W.B. Schwarz is as hollow a man as Dubya, why does he hate him so?  An educated guess might be that Dubya hasn’t been caught and Karl has.  Both have deceived and betrayed, but one man was a fortunate son whose wealth and familial connections obviated his need to ever pay the piper for his fiscal, moral, ethical and personal misdeeds.  The other son wasn’t so fortunate.

Author's note: Many people were interviewed for this article. Public government sources provided information on licensing, business licenses, court cases and other aspects of the story.  Some information was also gleaned from the web.

See also: Karl Schwarz forwards to YayaCanada his debate with "911 Team 8+"

See Karl Schwarz's response to this article
.

Comment

yayacanada.com

top


yayacanada.com
See: Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son

This page contains the emailed responses of self-proclaimed US presidential candidate Karl W. B. Schwarz.

Update: December 4, 2005 - Karl W.B. Schwarz has withdrawn his candidacy for the US 2008 presidential election.

Update: November 2005 -
Apparently a lot of people wrote to inform Schwarz that he had made an error in his newsletter by suggesting G. Gordon Liddy - of Watergate fame - and I. Lewis Libby - recently indicted in the Fitzgerald inquiry -  were father and son.  Schwarz spelled Liddy's name with two b's instead of two d's.  Now in his most recent newsletter, Schwarz denies making an error and claims he was testing his readers' knowledge!
     Don't buy a watch from this guy, and definitely do think twice before sending him a campaign donation!


Update: August 22, 2005: Karl Schwarz is at it again, feverishly attempting to discredit the information contained in Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son.  For anyone wishing to verify his assertion that the same server is used by all those he thinks are behind the article, a simple check here will assist you.  Click on "Email Dossier" and enter each of the email addresses Schwarz has provided.  You will find that the email address he gives for Madame Karnak is fictional, and the others are clearly on different servers. Now, if you want to think the rest of what he says is true, that's up to you.

Update 28.Jun.2005 20:30 - Portland Indymedia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by: MadAME KARNAK's best friend's sister's poodle's puppy
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/318783.shtml

Karl Schwarz has opened a new website: karlschwarz2008.com. He is soliciting campaign contributions, but to date has not registered his campaign with the Federal Election Committee nor, evidently, his Patmos Nanotechnologies securities. The interesting thing about his "securities" is that he is offering people shares in a partnership, which, of course, cannot be sold on the open market. Gee, do his investors know that? Additionally, he is sending harassing and threatening emails to the women that he imagines have perpetrated an expose' on him. It has not occured to Karl that Presidential candidates should expect to be investigated.

He even threatened one person with the PATRIOT ACT!!!! So, I guess that he doesn't want GWB to use it, but it is okay for him to use it? It is amazing how deep hypocrisy goes. Anyone who is interested in shutting this stuff down should contact RBNlive since they give him lots of air time and Tom Flacco his other shill.  Ruff


Disclaimer: June 25, 2005:
Despite Schwarz's allegations to the contrary, YayaCanada.com has never had any communication with anyone named Melinda Pillsbury-Foster or G. D. Pfeiffer, nor had we ever heard of G. D. Pfeiffer before today's date.  The person who submitted the article under the pseudonym "Madame Karnak" has been verified to our complete satisfaction as being neither of the two people Schwarz is accusing.

Karl Schwarz goes on the defensive
Karl Schwarz goes on the offensive

Karl Schwarz goes on the *icky*
Karl Schwarz goes too far


Karl Schwarz goes too far
Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 12:36 AM
Subject: FW: Karl Schwarz goes on the *icky*

Christians do not have to turn the other cheek to give a liar like you and your researcher another target.
 
The liar is you and your "researcher". 
 
Post it, or see you in court Corinne.
 
Karl

YYC:  My website is not a cheap tabloid. Schwarz should do as he said he was going to do and publish his "response" on his own website.

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is not the person who sent me the article "Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son", and I will not be a party to any vendetta against her.


Amy Sasser wasted no time in posting it at Portland Indymedia yesterday.  Those with strong enough stomachs can read it there.

This all began because I had questions about Karl Schwarz that were not answered by the internet personalities who rushed to publicize him sympathetically without checking into his background.  I can now close the books because my questions have been answered, not only by "Madame Karnak" but by Karl Schwarz's own diatribes.  Schwarz has shown himself to be an unfit candidate for president, let alone leader of the 9-11 truth movement.


This is the last email from Karl Schwarz, or about Karl Schwarz by one of his lackies, that I will respond to or post.  Any further communication to me regarding Karl Schwarz will have to be in the form of a court summons.

Karl Schwarz goes on the *icky*
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 11:27 PM
Subject: My response to your researcher

What you posted and my response will appear on my website tomorrow, my attorneys file next week.

Sincerely

Karl

YYC: Schwarz has sent me an extremely long diatribe about a particular person and himself that reads like one of those embarrassing TV shows where people tell all about their seamy lives and associations.  I'm glad he's posting it on his own website; I really don't want my site turned into an icky show and tell circus.  But I will say this - Karl Schwarz is going after the WRONG PERSON and if he goes ahead with this he can be sued for slander.  The person he imagines Madame Karnak to be did send me an article submission -  on the neo-conning of America - and after reading it and researching her background,  I decided not to publish it.

I can certainly understand why "Madame Karnak" and the people who were interviewed by her do not want to give their real names - this man is not only vindictive, he is so quick to revenge that he comes across as irrational.  More and more he reveals himself to be definitely not presidential material, any more than George W. Bush is.

In addition, I think Mr. Schwarz ought to try to remember that he calls himself a Christian.  That particular mask has slipped badly.



See: Karl Schwarz: Unfortunate Son

Karl Schwarz goes on the offensive


From: "Karl W B Schwarz" <[email protected]>
To: yayacanada.com
Cc: "'Meria Heller'"; "'Amy Sasser'"
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:50 PM

Hello Corinne,

We had already anticipated shills such as yourself popping to tell "half the story".  My campaign website will have the full story under full disclosure section, including polygraphs a certain ex-wife and her husband refused to answer, the portions you conveniently left off to "paint a picture".

I have nothing to hide, while others have much to hide and we intend to expose them all.

I have a team checking you out to the bottom of the barrel right now.  As part of responding to you, we will report what we find and your fascination with US political matters.

Welcome to the party lady.

Sincerely

Karl



See: Who is Karl Schwarz and for that matter a whole lot of other people?

Karl Schwarz goes on the defensive at YayaCanada's questions


Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: swing and a miss

You might be disappointed when my political site goes active very soon with a full disclosure page.  Your digging is a waste of time, but then maybe you have plenty of time to waste. Doubt that the FBI would admit it to you, but have undergone a massive investigation and not even unpaid parking tickets could be found.
 
Odd that a Canadian would be so focused on a third party move in the U.S. that has teeth.  The endorsements will say all that needs to be said.
 
You should be pleased when you see what my platform will state regarding Israel and Palestine, since you purport to be pro-Palestinian.
 
We shall see if you are or not soon enough.  As for my campaign, timing of certain matters, it is pointless to put the cart before the horse.

regards, 
Karl

YYC:  Now why would I be disappointed at full disclosure on Karl Schwarz, when the lack of it is so troubling to me?

I admit it would disappoint me a bit if the FBI really did pronounce him squeaky clean when there is so much indication to the contrary; but then I'm disappointed in their investigation of 9-11 as well.

It's mind-boggling that a US presidential candidate finds it "odd" that a Canadian might worry about a sincere and secular US third party movement getting derailed by the wrong sort of leadership.  Good grief!  Even the Shrub isn't surprised that Canadians worry about the US. Could Schwarz be dumber than Dubya?

All the same, he seems to want to please me on the Middle East issue, even though he labels me "pro-Palestinian" as if I were anti-Israel and wouldn't still be arguing for human rights and observance of international law if the brutally occupied were Jewish instead of Arab.

I don't know; maybe he's just not thinking clearly, period.


Comment

yayacanada.com

top


Why is Karl Schwarz so afraid of this website? www.portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/05/316680.shtml spook or strutter? 

 

portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

9.11 investigation

9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?

Everything about Schwarz, not everyone wants to know....
9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?
wild ties from US Defense Communications Agency (DCI) to Israeli Air Force

1) The Karl Schwarz- Karl Schwarz connection

Is Karl Schwarz connected with the personality of german Karl Schwarz?
Schwarz (US) insisted, it's not him.

German Karl Schwarz is interestingly a turbine specialist as well and involved with Lockheed
testflights.
 http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRH0110/FR0110d.htm


2) Schwarz mirrored number

His public telephone number, is still listed as 501-663-4959,
but already since last year belonging to someone named Robbie W Dickson - (501) 663-4959

3) Schwarz unregistered companies

Commaxxess, Inc. which was in alleged negotiations on assets from Global Crossing, had their website at a free host
Corporation Name GLOBALAXXESS, LLC.
 http://globalaxxess.net.tripod.com/

From researcher "Tradermule", November 2004:

"GlobalAxxess claims in its comments that it recently
made an offer to the United States Trustee and to
counsel for the Official llnsecured Creditors
Committee. GlobalAxxess Cmts., at 3. Applicants are
not aware of
any such offer. Moreover, as discussed above, the
Bankruptcy Court concluded that the Proposed
Transaction
represents the best offer to GCL and issued a Sale
Order approving the Proposed Transaction. Issues
regarding
other bids are properly directed to the Bankruptcy
Court, not the Commission."

Pg 5, note 8
at:
 link to gullfoss2.fcc.gov

They weren't aware because there was no such offer.
There are no billions. GlobalAxxess was nothing but an
empty registration in Arkansas.

Corporation Name GLOBALAXXESS, LLC.
Fictitious Names N/A
Filing # 100183720
Filing Type Limited Liability Company
Filed under Act Domestic LLC; 1003 of 1993
Status Revoked 12/31/2002
Principal Address

Reg. Agent T.B. PATTERSON, JR.

Agent Address 310 WEST SAINT LOUIS AVENUE

HOT SPRINGS, AR 719134406
Date Filed 04/10/2000
Officers N/A
Foreign Name N/A
Foreign Address

State of Origin
N/A

 link to www.sos.arkansas.gov

Who is T B Patterson, you ask? Well, he must be some
hotshot corporate lawyer! Nope.... put him in the
Arkansas search engine...


6 records found

Name City State Status
DATACOM SYSTEMS, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Good Standing
GLOBAL INTEGRATED, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked
GLOBALAXXESS, LLC. HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked
INVESTOR TRUST ORGANIZATION HOT SPRINGS AR Good
Standing
MILLENNIUM MARKETING, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Not Current
iNET DIGITAL VIDEO CORPORATION HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked

Corporation Name iNET DIGITAL VIDEO CORPORATION
Fictitious Names N/A
Filing # 100184670
Filing Type For Profit Corporation
Filed under Act Dom Bus Corp; 958 of 1987
Status Revoked 12/31/2002
Principal Address

Reg. Agent T.B. PATTERSON, JR.

Agent Address 310 WEST SAINT LOUIS AVENUE

HOT SPRINGS, AR 719134406
Date Filed 05/02/2000
Officers MARILYN M. SCWARZ, President
T.B. PATTERSON, JR., Secretary

Foreign Name N/A
Foreign Address

State of Origin N/A

Despite the misspelling, we suspect that Marylin M.
Scwarz is Marilyn Moody
Schwarz....

 link to 64.233.167.104

"...In March 1976, Karl Schwarz and his wife, Lois
Love Schwarz, purchased Lot 11 of the Hilltop Manor
Addition in Little Rock (Lot 11) as tenants by the
entirety. In January 1985, the Schwarzes separated,
Karl Schwarz moved out of the home, and a divorce
action was filed. In the resulting divorce decree
dated September 12, 1985, Karl Schwarz was ordered to
quitclaim his interest in the marital home to Lois
Schwarz, who later resumed using her maiden name of
Lois Love. He did not do so....."

(Love, Arkansas style.)


Where else is Karl Schwarz, you ask? Well you
might...

 link to 64.233.167.104

And...

 link to www.mdd.uscourts.gov

Well, what of Karl's multi-billion dollar "telecom"
company?

 http://members.tripod.com/eCapbank/

Well, sure... all multi-billion dollar companies use
free tripod webpages and an AT&T account e-mail
address, don't they? It's the growing trend in
worldwide companies.

The phone number and residental listing has not
changed. It was the same back on the Yahoo! GX board
where his "assistant" with the ID "barecreek"
explained that it was his "Mom's number". (go figure)
Don't take my word... call him up there. Just be
careful.... if you leave your hat on the table, Karl
will sell it to you.

What you can't find is a physical address for any of
his "multi-billion corporations". It has since
disappeared from the web but the only address back
then "GlobalAxxess Holdings, Inc. Attn: Mr. W. Gregg
Almand, General Counsel 11101 Anderson Drive, Suite
203 Little Rock, AR 72212"

Gregg seems to have moved but back then you could find
him
thus:

 link to 64.233.167.104


There was plenty more at the time but it all comes to
the same thing. Kark W B Schwarz is nothing but a
lying Arkansas con man. I will admit that I've never
quite cottoned to his exact game but I know a liar
when I see one.

Be careful out there.... particularly when they are
saying what you want to hear.

PS: Crap! I almost forgot. Where is T. B. Patterson,
the hotshot corporate lawyer? He's at

310 W. St. Louis Hot Springs, AR 71913

Right between the dentist:

(501) 624-3323. Beebe John C DDS. 308 W Saint Louis
St. Hot Springs, AR

and the doctor:

Thomas Wallace A MD 312 W Saint Louis St Hot Springs
501-624-1204

(that was so a year and a half ago, at least.... you
can check the current ones next to the big time
corporate lawyer in a dinkshit one man practice)


4) The GlobalAxxess.net -Chiaro connection


From researcher Brad M. (team8plus.org):

11-15-01 (Karl Schwarz') GlobalAxxess.net announces that Chiaro
Networks photonics core router technology will be
tested in GlobalAxxess hubs starting in mid 2002.
This technology is scalable to 1.5 petabits per second
and switching speeds of 5 nanoseconds.

 http://members.tripod.com/eCapbank/id24.htm

So Karls whole big buisiness depends on these guys...

Meet Chiaro...
 http://www.chiaro.com/about/our_investors.jsp

 http://www.chiaro.com/
networking, supercomputing, telecommunications and
photonics.
Address: 5 Nahum Hefzadi St.
Jerusalem
ISRAEL, 95484
Telephone: 02-6595539

www.matimop.org.il/newrdinf/company/c2485.htm


From researcher ewing2001 (team8plus.org) :


Founder of Chiaro was Dr. Eyal Shekel, in 1997.
A former captain in the Israeli Air Force
 http://www.israelseed.com/portfolio/port_det.asp?id=1

Chiaro is a portfolio company of Pitango.
Their contact info 5 Nahum Hefzadi St.,
Headquarters:
269 West Renner Parkway
Richardson, Texas 75080 USA


 http://www.pitango.com/portfolio_company.asp?ID=63
 http://www.pitango.com/team_member.asp?ID=24

Rami Kalish of Chiaro once founded Polaris in 1993,
the year of WTC attack No.1
Polaris was later renamed into Pitango.

Polaris however was the result of a Israeli Government
Initiative:

 http://vcexperts.com/vce/news/buzz/archive_view.asp?id=259
4/12/2005
Dr. Shlomo Kalish & Micah Avni,
Jerusalem Global Ventures


"...The industry, however, was formed in the early 90s
and boosted by a government initiative called Yozma,
which subsidized foreign LPs to invest in Israeli
funds. Several funds were formed, including Polaris
(now renamed Pitango), Gemini, Nitzanim (now called
Concord), Star Ventures, Oxton (now called JVP), and
others...

Managing Partner of Pitango was Nechemia Peres, "who
is also the chairman of the Israeli Venture Capital
Association, and son to former prime minister, Shimon
Peres..."


Another Director of Chiaro in Richardson, Texas is Jon Bayless.
(funding of company was started in March 1997)

Bayless was previously with Arthur A. Collins, Inc.,
Defense Communications Agency, E-Systems and Motorola.

The founder of Arthur A. Collins was a high tech
radio- and avionics specialist.

 http://www.wa3key.com/aacbio.html

He received the Secretary of the Navy's Distinguished
Public Service Award Citation in 1962, the Iowa
Broadcasters Association Distinguished Service Award
in 1966, was elected to the National Academy of
Engineering in 1968, received the Armed Forces
Communications and Electronics Association's David
Sarnoff Award in 1979, and the Electronics Industries
Association's Medal of Honor in 1980.


Since recently Chiaro has the following products:

The Enstara IP/MPLS platform and some router softwares like ChiarOS
Among their investors is still Pitango, Israel Seed Partners, Siemens and
others.

On January 3, 2005 it was confirmed, that Israel Seed Partners start-up
MobileAccess will install an US House of Representatives communications
system
 http://www.israelseed.com/press/pressroom_detail.asp?id=259
pop goes the a3 skywarrior bubble? 02.May.2005 22:21

.

.

Karl Schwarz 03.May.2005 06:41

A Sasser [email protected]

Hi Nico Haupt,

I haven't been following you but I have been following Karl Schwarz for a long time. I knew the instant the government stated that 911 was done by a bunch of crazy box cutting Arabs, that it was an inside job. That was the biggest give away for me. I see that you have contributed much to the 911 truth movement. I want to thank you. Granted some of people in the truth movement need to be kicked to the curb. I will not name names, I don't want to get into that discussion. They know who they are they will be outed with their lack of activity for the truth.


BTY if you had read Karl's book you would have know about his plans for the white house. Read his book you will find out who Karl is. It takes apart the Wall/ the war machine crooks all the way to the top. He was busy doing that.You forgot the most important link. You can find it at  link to www.google.com this is what you are looking for too. Dig in there you will find what Karl was trying to prevent from happening. Bush sold it out of the USA. So try to find out where it went? I know these players. I was in telecom companies that had IP. I was watching them being killed one by one. The scam on the market was intentional by Clinton to raise the market to inflated numbers and pull the rug out of unknowing people. Also the companies were lost in shell companies . Such as Enron. Fincacal terrorism by the Bush/Clinton Crime family @ work.

Always follow the money as you can see it is still happening.
 http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=610 here is a great board to look what is happening to the stock market. it is the scam board. My screen name is easymoney101 if you want to find out who I am...

If you read Karl's book you will know why the Bush Crime family wants the SS to go into the hands of wall street.
Clinton was also selling out IP to other Countries. Remember the selling weapons technology to the Chinese?
Unless you read Karl's book you will have no clue what he has uncovered.

There are some of us that found out who Karl was When his letter to The president was published. And we haven't stopped helping him bring the message of truth to the public. I found out who he was BEFORE I started to do anything. I will say again to all unless you read his book you will have no idea the length of his investigation.

Below is something that was posted on the boards last week that caught my eye. Karl has unraveled the players in his book. He did a few companies you can bet that the players are the same for most of the scam market.. I ordered Karl's book by Chapter 5, I realized what I had in my hand and ordered 5 more for my family members. It is damming for the powers that be. The evidence is there in black and white document after document.
While you guys were looking at the plane angle others were working on the financial angle of 911 and there is more out there besides Karl book.
..............................................................................................................................
9/11 planning and a possible sequel
Tue Apr 26, 2005 22:56
64.140.158.12


While we listen to the platitudes, we seem to be rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic.

Chairman Mo's bondholders in Nortel buy backdoor to U.S. Homeland Security

From:
David Hawkins, Forensic Economist at Hawks' CAFE
 http://www.davidhawkinsresearch.com/source/cafe-009.html

To:
Judi McLeod, Founder Editor, Canada Free Press
Ron Gamble, Leader of the Reform Party of British Columbia
Russ Hiebert, Conservative Member of Parliament, South-Surrey Cloverdale

Cc:
Leaders

Bcc:
Citizens

Dear Judi, Ron and Russ,

A question that matters ....
Where do Chairman Mo's (Maurice Strong) bondholders in Nortel - a near-bankrupt, discredited "pump-and-dump" company under police investigation in Canada and U.S. - get $448 million in cash to buy PEC and a backdoor into U.S. Homeland Security?

26 April 2005: "CBC News TORONTO - Nortel Networks Corp. said Tuesday it's buying PEC Solutions, an information technology firm based in Virginia that serves the U.S. government. Nortel will pay $448 million US in cash......PEC is a 20-year-old firm that sells information technology to security, law enforcement, intelligence, defence and civilian agencies of the U.S. federal government. PEC's customers include the U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of the Chief Information Officer for Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement."

2002-2004: "EDC support (and thus that of the Canadian taxpayer) is crucial to Nortel's ability to generate international sales. As one observer put it "Nortel Networks Corp. and Bombardier did not become multi-billion dollar global leaders just by making cutting edge products; they also helped many of their biggest customers to buy them using big loans from [Chairman Mo controlled] Export Development Canada." Almost half of EDC's $21 billion loan portfolio is to Nortel and Bombardier clients. EDC financing for Nortel sales is particularly important given the weak state of the telecom industry worldwide highlighted by the fact that Nortel's foreign buyers have not repaid $4.1 billion of its loans to them (Nortel lent this money between 1997 and 2000 to finance its sales). Cash-strapped foreign telecom companies are unlikely to buy Nortel products without EDC financing."
 http://www.ckln.fm/~asadismi/nortel.html

January 2004: "Research into 9/11 planning and a possible sequel, suggests that Maurice Strong and fellow insiders at Power Corp, Montreal, are laundering UN oil-for-food money through off-book partners, including French banks and oil, water and arms traders. We ask if insiders sold espionage services to the likes of Jacques Chirac, Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden using Lansdowne Technologies - a subsidiary of Canadian Steamship Lines — then owned by then finance minister, Paul Martin. We ask if Power Corp's privy councillors (Maurice Strong, Paul Desmarais and Don Mazankowski) or its ex-executive Paul Martin (now prime minister of Canada) or its French directors, hired Jacobins (radical socialists) or Jihadists (Islamic reactionaries) as mercenaries for attacks on America by a UN multilateral elite in its war on equity and the sovereign state."
 http://www.davidhawkinsresearch.com/source/ibat-001.html

In April 2001: Chairman Mo, Paul Martin's blind trust company, Lansdowne Technologies, announced it had "completed its fifth management facilitation program with Nortel Networks this week. As [$200 billion pump-and-dump] companies such as Nortel encounter market adjustments [bubble pricked shares collapse], business units need to respond quickly and strategically to support long term corporate growth and short term results. Lansdowne has been supporting Nortel in this endeavor [manipulation] over the past two years."  http://www.lansdowne.com/News/2001-04-01.htm

While we listen to the platitudes, we seem to be rearranging the deckchairs on the Titannic.

Regards,

David Hawkins


David Hawkins - Foundation Scholar - Cambridge University
Citizen's Association of Forensic Economists at Hawks' CAFE
Global networking for "Clarity, Equity and One Set of Books"
Tel: (604) 542-0891  [email protected]
 http://www.DavidHawkinsResearch.com



In Truth
Amy Sasser Merritt Island Florida

Pop goes your Bubble! 29.May.2005 08:11

Becky Garrick [email protected]

 http://www.tomflocco.com/

check out the front page article on A3

Karl Schwarz is a patriotic Christian truth teller. So that makes the writer of this professional hit piece a ....what? If you would like to listen to Karl in archived interviews...go here: www.rbnlive.com or www.meria.net........listen and learn
Becky Garrick

Schwarz responds... 30.May.2005 05:14

repost

Sat, 28 May 2005

"....when I left Wall Street I teamed up with UUNet as their only global VAR. Due to the costs of creating a global communications network, and the regulatory hassles, we developed an LTA HAA (Lighter than Air, High Altitude Airship) that is a communications platform. FCC would not let us have a frequency to keep the ships on station, so we developed the world's most advanced hyperspectral system that could keep the ships in position visually, night or day, any type of weather, and well outside of the ability of FCC and major telecoms to regulate or stop.

As a result of that communications (not defense) related work, we moved into nanotechnology because these high altitude craft have to carry huge loads and have to be extremely durable in a very hostile 80,000 to 100,000 foot altitude environment. Nanotechnology fabrics and composites are 15 times stronger than Kevlar..."


Schwarz promised to answer on the following questions below on Wednesday, June 1st


1)
Did you ever work as a private military or
intelligence contractor for the Pentagon or CIA and
would that explain, that you former companies are not
properly listed in registration databases?

2)
What happened after the negotiations of your company
GlobalAxxess with Global Crossing?

4)
Why was GlobalAxxess not properly listed?

4)
Did your former wife, Lois Love use a fake name,
because she was related to private intelligence, too?

5)
Is it correct, that your partner companies connected
with
-US Defense Communications Agency
-Israeli Air Force
-Israeli Venture Capital
Nechemia Peres, son to former prime minister, Shimon
Peres

and can you explain these connections, means did you
ever meet any of these related "operations"?

6)
Why did you decide to use "tripod" as a host for a
company website?

7)
How is Marylin M. Scwarz related to you?

8)
Is it correct, that T. B. Patterson worked as your
divorce and business lawyer?
Can you explain, why it is very difficult to get any
background information or public records on him?

9)
Is your partner of GlobalAxxess.net, Chiaro Networks
and his founder, Dr. Eyal Shekel (ex-Israeli Air
Force) in any form related to business with Lockheed,
Raytheon, TRW or Boeing?

10)
Is Jon Bayless, Director of Chiaro in Richardson,
Texas, in any form related to business with FAA, NRO,
NSA or NIMA/NGA?

11)
How can you explain a business/political conflict of
interest, that the sponsor of Chiaro, "Israel Seed
Partners" and his start-up MobileAccess will install
an US House of Representatives communications
system ?

12)
Are you using the campaign on revealing the "truth
about 9/11" in any way as a revenge on private US
military - or intelligence contractors, who sabotaged
you in the past?

13)
Why do you ignore in your articles, that the official
story about flight 11, 175, 77 and 93 is a LIE.
These flights either did not exist, did not depart or
departed at different times, in opposite to official
story.

14)
Last, but not least. Why did you announce to run as
president? Are you not giving people false hope, who
are aware of rigged e-voting machine, furthermore why
you ignore documents and plans of pending world war
"4", which might even start before the next election?
Means, why you pretend, that democracy still exist,
instead already replaced by fascism?
For which party do you wanna run? Is this decision
really a protection strategy et... ??

Karl Schwarz responds... 01.Jun.2005 18:53

repozt

First off I will address the Portland Indy Media posting and demonstrate the
irrelevance and inaccuracy of most of this researcher's alleged findings.



The Portland Indy Media post is a partially the work of plagiarism in that
Kelly Ann Thomas of Texas had typed most of this before and placed it on her
website. She then retracted it all after we began direct communications.



 link to karmakat.typepad.com





Everything about Schwarz, not everyone wants to know....



9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?
wild ties from US Defense Communications Agency (DCI) to Israeli Air Force





Response: Have not at any time in the past or present had anything to do
with DCI or Israeli Air Force. This person is reaching to create
controversy out of nothing.



1) The Karl Schwarz- Karl Schwarz connection

Is Karl Schwarz connected with the personality of german Karl Schwarz?
Schwarz (US) insisted, it's not him.

German Karl Schwarz is interestingly a turbine specialist as well and
involved with Lockheed test flights.
 http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRH0110/FR0110d.htm




Response: Absolutely no connection whatsoever. The German Karl Schwarz was
actually connected to Lufthansa and their Lockheed aircraft, more so than
Lockheed. It would help if "read" and "pay attention" were in the same
breath.



Just because two people have the same name does not a conspiracy make.
There is also a Karl Schwarz brewery in Austria, Karl Schwarz MD and Karl
Schwarz theologian, all, no relationship whatsoever to me.




2) Schwarz mirrored number

His public telephone number, is still listed as 501-663-4959,
but already since last year belonging to someone named Robbie W Dickson -
(501) 663-4959





Response: Has not been my telephone number for quite some time. Any
researcher worth a penny would know that Robbie W. Dickson is my mother's
re-married name and that I have a half-brother with the last name of
Dickson. Wow, what a researcher. My telephone is AC 770. See if this
genius can figure it out since such inaccuracy is assured to prove nothing
on 9-11.




3) Schwarz unregistered companies

Commaxxess, Inc. which was in alleged negotiations on assets from Global
Crossing, had their website at a free host



Response: COMMAXXESS, Inc. was quite registered, in Delaware and offshore.
Shoddy research to have not known that, or focus on just one state or one
nation. "Rank Amateur" comes to mind. COMMAXXESS never shared a website
with GlobalAxxess. GlobalAxxess is the former global VAR of UUNet, only
global VAR of 15 VARs allowed by UUNet. The website used to redirect to a
UUNet / GlobalAxxess joint site but that ended when the relationship did.
When WorldCom purchased UUNet, we were already aware of the fraud going on
inside of WCOM and changed names to distance our IP-centric activities from
WCOM and what was headed their way.



This "researcher" is to me obviously myopic and not very thorough, or does
not understand business structure and relationships that have nothing to do
with 9-11.




Corporation Name GLOBALAXXESS, LLC.
 http://globalaxxess.net.tripod.com/




Response: We used a remote domain host away from our main servers because
of WCOM attempts to hack into our customer base. Irrelevant, meaningless
research by this person and drawing ludicrous assumptions.







From researcher "Tradermule", November 2004:

"GlobalAxxess claims in its comments that it recently made an offer to the
United States Trustee and to counsel for the Official llnsecured Creditors
Committee. GlobalAxxess Cmts., at 3. Applicants are not aware of
any such offer. Moreover, as discussed above, the Bankruptcy Court concluded
that the Proposed Transaction represents the best offer to GCL and issued a
Sale Order approving the Proposed Transaction. Issues
regarding other bids are properly directed to the Bankruptcy Court, not the
Commission."





Response: The attorneys for the secured creditors - the ones that were in
control of the bankruptcy, was Milbank Twead, NYC, specifically Allan
Brilliant and Diedre Sullivan. Met with them on several occassions [Chase
Plaza, lower Manhattan] regarding the higher offer, $415 million cash, $400
million per year over 5 years. Offer was presented to US Trustee, Secured
and Unsecured Creditors. Tradermule's "findings" are not close to accurate.
It was a 282 page document prepared by bankruptcy counsel for the
acquisition of Global Crossing assets in bankruptcy.



If this person "Tradermile" had taken the time to read "One-Way Ticket to
Crawford, TX" they would have known all about it in chapters 12-14. Again,
shoddy, half done research that is totally irrelevant to 9-11.



The only offer ever submitted by Global Crossing to the court was the lowest
offer, no due diligence. This person needs to read One Way Ticket to
Crawford Texas to understand why that happened and why "high bid with due
diligence" was something feared by Global Crossing and many of their main
Wall Street creditors. Part of the NWO you fear is they needed a global
financial network owned by the banks, i.e. Global Crossing.



Pg 5, note 8
at:
 link to gullfoss2.fcc.gov
< link to gullfoss2.fcc.gov
nt=6513387091> &id_document=6513387091

They weren't aware because there was no such offer. There are no billions.
GlobalAxxess was nothing but an empty registration in Arkansas.





Response: Another erroneous assumption. There are hundreds of documents
filed on this website that expose the entire Global Crossing scam.
GlobalAxxess was a dba of a much larger holding co that raised $1.6 billion
offshore. The parent entity is domiciled in Germany. As a VAR of UUNet,
that became owned by WCOM, we kept our distance while still doing business
offshore. We were never a US VAR of UUNet and looking in the US for a
Global VAR is amateurish.



GlobalAxxess was from inception a subsidiary and was merely registered in
the U.S. Nothing even remarkable about that, except some that love to waste
their time and others. GlobalAxxess ceased doing business under that name
in June 2003, so continuation of the registration was meaningless. It was
registered in many other places than Arkansas. Revoked in the context
showed below means the registration was not "renewed", paid for to be
extended another year. Very simple process, either pay and renew or let it
lapse because it is not needed, not used.



Had this person read the book I wrote, the pointlessness of their post would
be evident. The proof of funds was faxed to the White House on request;
that is in the book I wrote as well.



My divorce was in 2002, business interests moved out of Arkansas or, kept
out of Arkansas and in some instances out of the U.S.



One of the things to watch out for in bankruptcy cases are the "penny stock
whores". With a handle like "Tradermule", might be one of those types of
vultures. They do not like anyone who stands up for the shareholders as I
did. Relevant information would be to find out if Tradermule is this type
of person for they are quite sleazy.



Corporation Name GLOBALAXXESS, LLC.
Fictitious Names N/A
Filing # 100183720
Filing Type Limited Liability Company
Filed under Act Domestic LLC; 1003 of 1993
Status Revoked 12/31/2002
Principal Address

Reg. Agent T.B. PATTERSON, JR.

Agent Address 310 WEST SAINT LOUIS AVENUE

HOT SPRINGS, AR 719134406
Date Filed 04/10/2000
Officers N/A
Foreign Name N/A
Foreign Address

State of Origin
N/A



 http://www.sos.arkansas.gov/corps/search_corps.php?DETAIL=96920
< link to www.sos.arkansas.gov
d=&corp_name=globalaxxess&agent_search=&agent_city=&agent_state=&filing_numb
er=&cmd=>
&corp_type_id=&corp_name=globalaxxess&agent_search=&agent_city=&agent_state=
&filing_number=&cmd=

Who is T B Patterson, you ask? Well, he must be some hotshot corporate
lawyer! Nope.... put him in the Arkansas search engine...


6 records found

Name City State Status
DATACOM SYSTEMS, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Good Standing
GLOBAL INTEGRATED, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked
GLOBALAXXESS, LLC. HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked
INVESTOR TRUST ORGANIZATION HOT SPRINGS AR Good
Standing
MILLENNIUM MARKETING, LLC HOT SPRINGS AR Not Current
iNET DIGITAL VIDEO CORPORATION HOT SPRINGS AR Revoked

Corporation Name iNET DIGITAL VIDEO CORPORATION
Fictitious Names N/A
Filing # 100184670
Filing Type For Profit Corporation
Filed under Act Dom Bus Corp; 958 of 1987
Status Revoked 12/31/2002
Principal Address

Reg. Agent T.B. PATTERSON, JR.

Agent Address 310 WEST SAINT LOUIS AVENUE

HOT SPRINGS, AR 719134406
Date Filed 05/02/2000
Officers MARILYN M. SCWARZ, President
T.B. PATTERSON, JR., Secretary

Foreign Name N/A
Foreign Address

State of Origin N/A





Response: This person missed over 30 entities, but then focusing on
Arkansas when business interests are in other states, other countries is
quite the waste of time. T. B. Patterson, Jr. lives in South Carolina, not
Arkansas. I live in GA, not Arkansas. Very shoddy research, but then maybe
half-baked assumptions is the point of such "researchers". Sure have not
proven anything on 9-11.





Despite the misspelling, we suspect that Marylin M. Scwarz is Marilyn Moody
Schwarz....







Response: Former Wife, we divorced in 2002 and divorce was granted to me.
Reason, none of anyone's business but ours. "Suspect?" Big deal, totally
irrelevant. Her name was Marilyn McDougald Schwarz, not Marilyn Moody
Schwarz. Again, shoddy research.






 link to 64.233.167.104
s/1996a/960918/ca94-695.wpd+
< link to 64.233.167.104
ns/1996a/960918/ca94-695.wpd+&hl=en> &hl=en

"...In March 1976, Karl Schwarz and his wife, Lois
Love Schwarz, purchased Lot 11 of the Hilltop Manor
Addition in Little Rock (Lot 11) as tenants by the entirety. In January
1985, the Schwarzes separated, Karl Schwarz moved out of the home, and a
divorce action was filed. In the resulting divorce decree dated September
12, 1985, Karl Schwarz was ordered to quitclaim his interest in the marital
home to Lois Schwarz, who later resumed using her maiden name of Lois Love.
He did not do so....."

(Love, Arkansas style.)





Response: Had this person been "transparent" and not self-serving, they
would have admitted that the issue before the Arkansas Supreme Court was the
forgery of my name on deeds. They would also have admitted to all of you
readers that I won, the lower court was reversed and remanded, we filed
criminal charges against the attorney who forged my name and he killed
himself the next day.



Shoddy reporting by Portland Indy Media in not letting you know that I won
the issue and proved the forgery.



Under Arkansas law, chancellors have only three choices regarding marital
property - the man buys out the wife interest in home, she buys him out, or
the home is sold, equity split. I was ordered to sign a quitclaim deed and
refused, my right WITHIN THE LAW. They forged my name, we proved that too.


Where else is Karl Schwarz, you ask? Well you might...


 link to 64.233.167.104
s/1996a/961028/96-458.wpd+
< link to 64.233.167.104
ns/1996a/961028/96-458.wpd+&hl=en> &hl=en







Response: We recovered our money lost due to the forgeries from another
source. These parties were held not liable.



And...


 link to www.mdd.uscourts.gov
00.pdf






Response: This was a RICO trial that was not allowed to go to trial. Only
cost me $89.45 million, some place this "researcher" will never be in his or
her life.







Well, what of Karl's multi-billion dollar "telecom" company?

 http://members.tripod.com/eCapbank/

Well, sure... all multi-billion dollar companies use free tripod webpages
and an AT&T account e-mail address, don't they? It's the growing trend in
worldwide companies.

The phone number and residental listing has not changed. It was the same
back on the Yahoo! GX board where his "assistant" with the ID "barecreek"
explained that it was his "Mom's number". (go figure) Don't take my word...
call him up there. Just be careful.... if you leave your hat on the table,
Karl
will sell it to you.



Response: changed long ago, seems this person cannot follow chronology at
all. Anne Melo, senior executive assistant to me for 6 years, now lives in
Canada. Cannot call me at that number, but then "FACTS" are not this
persons point or forte. My AC is 770, not 501

What you can't find is a physical address for any of his "multi-billion
corporations". It has since disappeared from the web but the only address
back then "GlobalAxxess Holdings, Inc. Attn: Mr. W. Gregg Almand, General
Counsel 11101 Anderson Drive, Suite 203 Little Rock, AR 7221.2"







Response: The IP servers were in Little Rock. The company was based
offshore so looking in AR was a waste of time.



There were dual Juniper M-160s and dual Juniper M-20 routers. You
Inspector Gadgets can figure out on your own how much capacity such units
have and can handle.



This person obviously has a myopia regarding Arkansas, and that is not where
the company was based. Where I live and where I have business interests are
not necessarily the same. Only a fool would draw such conclusions. For
example, I live in GA, business is SC based, plant is in VA and more coming
in South America, Europe and Canada later this year. Only an amateur like
this purported "9-11 investigator" was make such ludicrous connections that
do not exist and assumptions that show his intent to twist the truth.



Maybe Gerard can figure out where our offices were outside of Sydney.



Maybe this Portland Indy Media person can figure out where in Singapore, LA,
NYC and London, or in Budapest, the other network hubs were located. If my
competitors could not, doubt this Indy Media person or Nico Haupt can figure
it out.



If they can figure that out, prêtty good at research. If not, they need to
go back to whatever it was they were doing before 9-11 for they will never
prove or be constructive in the 9-11 prosecution matters.





Gregg seems to have moved but back then you could find him thus:


 link to 64.233.167.104
William+G.+%22Gregg%22+Almand+Representing+people+with+legal+problems+such+a
s+Automobile+Accidents,+Accidental+Injuries,+Defective+or+Dangerous+Products
,+Business+Disputes,+Commercial+Litigation,+Victims+of+Fraud,+Divorce,+Colle
ction+of+Child+Support,+Child+Custody,+Other+Matters+involving+Children,+Con
tract+Disputes,+Small+Businesses,+Wills+and+Probate,+and+most+other+legal+ma
tters.+I+do+not+take+criminal+cases,+bankruptcy,+or+tax+cases,+but+I+can+ref
er+these+questions+and+cases+to+lawyers+who+do+practice+in+these+areas+of+th
e+law.&hl=en




Response: Gregg Almand has not worked with us since early 2001. Dated
information and nothing to do with 9-11 or me.




There was plenty more at the time but it all comes to the same thing. Kark W
B Schwarz is nothing but a lying Arkansas con man. I will admit that I've
never quite cottoned to his exact game but I know a liar when I see one.



Response: Sure sounds like slander to me. Will have my attorneys address
this one. I underwent a full FBI investigation in 1999-2000 due to Clinton
and the FBI did not find what this person alleges. This alleged "9-11
researcher" that could not solve a Girl Scout cookie scam, much less 9-11 or
anything regarding me.



Nothing I do is questionable unless people try to spin half baked ideas like
this debate has been.




Be careful out there.... particularly when they are saying what you want to
hear.



Response: Yes, be careful of sham investigators that cannot follow any
trail or use critical thinking. Just another coward behind a keyboard that
did not even identify him or her self.






PS: Crap! I almost forgot. Where is T. B. Patterson, the hotshot corporate
lawyer? He's at

310 W. St. Louis Hot Springs, AR 71913

Right between the dentist:

(501) 624-3323. Beebe John C DDS. 308 W Saint Louis
St. Hot Springs, AR

and the doctor:

Thomas Wallace A MD 312 W Saint Louis St Hot Springs
501-624-1204

(that was so a year and a half ago, at least.... you can check the current
ones next to the big time corporate lawyer in a dinkshit one man practice)





Response: Do something productive. Wrong again. T. B. Patterson's office
is in South Carolina, does not live in Hot Springs, AR. If this person
cannot figure out simple things, what are they doing in the 9-11
investigation?




4) The GlobalAxxess.net -Chiaro connection


From researcher Brad M. (team8plus.org):

11-15-01 (Karl Schwarz') GlobalAxxess.net announces that Chiaro Networks
photonics core router technology will be tested in GlobalAxxess hubs
starting in mid 2002. This technology is scalable to 1.5 petabits per
second and switching speeds of 5 nanoseconds.

 http://members.tripod.com/eCapbank/id24.htm

So Karls whole big business depends on these guys...





Response: Wrong again, but then what's new with this investigator that
looks at everything backwards. Maybe that is the purpose of his/her post.



I am getting a very clear picture why you folks and your "research team" are
getting nothing accomplished on 9-11.




Meet Chiaro...
 http://www.chiaro.com/about/our_investors.jsp

 http://www.chiaro.com/
networking, supercomputing, telecommunications and
photonics.
Address: 5 Nahum Hefzadi St.
Jerusalem
ISRAEL, 95484
Telephone: 02-6595539

www.matimop.org.il/newrdinf/company/c2485.htm




Response: This person conveniently leaves off the controlling US investors
in Chiaro and attempts to characterize it as an Israel controlled company,
which it is not.


From researcher ewing2001 (team8plus.org) :


Founder of Chiaro was Dr. Eyal Shekel, in 1997.
A former captain in the Israeli Air Force
 http://www.israelseed.com/portfolio/port_det.asp?id=1

Chiaro is a portfolio company of Pitango.
Their contact info 5 Nahum Hefzadi St.,
Headquarters:
269 West Renner Parkway
Richardson, Texas 75080 USA



Response: Pitango (formerly Polaris) was and is a minority stake holder of
Chiaro. The Chiaro company is controlled by US investors, albeit Jewish for
the most part but more so TEXAS.




 http://www.pitango.com/portfolio_company.asp?ID=63
 http://www.pitango.com/team_member.asp?ID=24

Rami Kalish of Chiaro once founded Polaris in 1993, the year of WTC attack
No.1 Polaris was later renamed into Pitango.





Response: Chiaro, Pitango, 1993 founding and 9-11 have nothing at all to do
with each other. Most of the Chiaro executives worked for Alcatel in the
1990s.

Maybe this person needs to discern the difference between Zionist and Jew,
and the difference between 1993, 2001 and right now, 2005.





Polaris however was the result of a Israeli Government Initiative:

 http://vcexperts.com/vce/news/buzz/archive_view.asp?id=259
4/12/2005
Dr. Shlomo Kalish & Micah Avni,
Jerusalem Global Ventures


"...The industry, however, was formed in the early 90s and boosted by a
government initiative called Yozma, which subsidized foreign LPs to invest
in Israeli



funds. Several funds were formed, including Polaris (now renamed Pitango),
Gemini, Nitzanim (now called Concord), Star Ventures, Oxton (now called
JVP), and others...

Managing Partner of Pitango was Nechemia Peres, "who is also the chairman of
the Israeli Venture Capital Association, and son to former prime minister,
Shimon Peres..."





Response: This "investigator" finally got something right. We stayed arm's
length from any involvement with Israel because of their spying on the US
and using core router and telecom switch software to do it. We have never
had anything to do with the Israel parties in any manner.



BGPs and ASICs of Chiaro were certified by our people to have no back doors
for Israeli intelligence gathering by our code writers and core router
specialist. If you folks do not know what BPG and ASIC are, educate
yourselves for I do not have time to do that.



Have never met him, never talked to Peres, do not know him.





Another Director of Chiaro in Richardson, Texas is Jon Bayless.
(funding of company was started in March 1997)

Bayless was previously with Arthur A. Collins, Inc.,
Defense Communications Agency, E-Systems and Motorola.





Response: Bayless was not involved in anything we did with Chiaro. Again,
nothing to do with 9-11 whatsoever.





The founder of Arthur A. Collins was a high tech radio- and avionics
specialist.

 http://www.wa3key.com/aacbio.html

He received the Secretary of the Navy's Distinguished Public Service Award
Citation in 1962, the Iowa Broadcasters Association Distinguished Service
Award in 1966, was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 1968,
received the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association's David
Sarnoff Award in 1979, and the Electronics Industries Association's Medal of
Honor in 1980.





Response: Totally irrelevant and no relationship with us, our company or
me.


Since recently Chiaro has the following products:

The Enstara IP/MPLS platform and some router softwares like ChiarOS
Among their investors is still Pitango, Israel Seed Partners, Siemens and
others.



Response: and Sevin Rosen, the controlling partners. Amazing what this
person keeps leaving out and trying to spin a bogus tapestry. If this
person is going to do homework, they need to learn to complete the
assignment. Israelis do not control Chiaro. The Israeli physicist invented
one component of the Chiaro core routers, Dr. Eyal Shekel. The rest of it
was invented in the US.



We are currently making such technology even better through nanotechnology
and photonics.



By the way, military service in Israel is mandatory so do not make too much
of anyone's past in Israel being military related. Somewhat naïve to make
assumptions that have no basis in fact or stretch things into something they
are not.






On January 3, 2005 it was confirmed, that Israel Seed Partners start-up
MobileAccess will install an US House of Representatives communications
system
 http://www.israelseed.com/press/pressroom_detail.asp?id=259



Response: Israel Seed Partners held less then 10% of Chiaro. The larger VC
firms were US based including Sevin Rosen, the firm that bailed out Compaq
years ago. Minority partners were not controlling Chiaro in any manner, nor
were Israeli interests. We had the same concerns before deciding to do
business with them.


...connections to -US Defense Communications Agency

Response: None whatsoever ...then or now.

Israeli Air Force

Response: None whatsoever ...then or now.


-Israeli Venture Capital

Response: None whatsoever ...then or now.

Nechemia Peres, son to former prime minister, Shimon Peres


Response: None whatsoever ...then or now.


If you are this far off base on "facts" regarding me, how far off are you on
9-11?

I am German descent, very anti-Zionist. Not popular in Israel at all...

Schwarz was formerly married to someone named "Lois Love".
>
come to your own conclusions :)


...Her name is Lois Jean Love, her maiden name; not a bogus name in any manner.
...We were married for 11 and a half years.

She is the mother of my only child, Ryan Matthew Schwarz, Cpl, Arkansas National
Guard 39th Infantry Brigade, attached to 1st Cavalry Division, Baghdad, just
returned 8 weeks ago from Iraq.

Want to be concerned about something relevant? The attack plan for Iran was
being done in Baghdad, ready to implement any time.

... I have no
subversive or odd connections whatsoever other than what you folks are
dreaming up out of nothingness. A relationship with a company or technology
does not translate into a relationship with the investors who created the
technology or the company. If you think it does, you need a reality check
or just showing off your naivety ...

Schwarz responds... (2) 02.Jun.2005 19:31

Nico Haupt

Schwarz answered to a huge group, who confronted him also with other questions, he didn't answer yet.

Among this group:
 [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  carlson.jon@cheqnet.n[email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],


Karl Schwarz responds (2)

1) "...My connections to defense and intelligence related persons are communications security based or nanotechnology...."


This clearly means for me, that Schwarz IS a defense contractor.

Nanotechnology is an important part of the Department of Defense, including Nanoweaponry.
In 2001 the US invested 125 million USD in nanotechnology initiatives for the Department of Defense (DoD). The proposed budget for 2005 includes 276 million USD for the DoD and 1 million USD for homeland security (together this is approximately 28% of the total nanotechnology budget).
For example, the Institute of Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN) at MIT was established in 2002 with a five-year 50 million USD contract from the US military and is looking at producing a battle-suit that provides improved protection, monitors vital signs and (at the same time) is lighter than conventional equipment.

This comes even from a non-DoD source
 link to www.azonano.com

This IS AN "Application", Period.

Maybe Schwarz is so naive and believe, he is dealing with hollywood geeks, who still think, "weapons" of the defense are just some missiles and bombs and cute effects in hiphop videos, but this isn't the 80sanymore.

Using his vocabulary, according to the "Military Application Society", they deal with "development and application of process modeling and operations research analyses to military issues".

Therefore even an "analysis" is a military application.

Means, Karl Schwarz is not just military in the naive
world of action movie fans ('...we're shooting
back...", Schwarz 06/02, 05), he furthermore develops
"AIM 100 lasing devices", which "can light up targets
up to 30 miles in all directions for air strikes,artillery, mortar, or helicopters to dispose of problems", but is naive enough to sell the idea, that nanotechnology cannot be used a a military
application.


Contractor of defense is contractor. Period.
Wether you sell tomatoes, paper or nanotech.

In a follow up email, Schwarz confirms this again:
"...Yes, it is an application and you are erroneously drawing a conclusion
(an assumption) that me and my company are involved in it..."

False. There is no conclusion on my side. The confirmation was already presented by Schwarz:
"...My connections to defense and intelligence related persons are communications security based or nanotechnology...."

If Schwarz thinks, he can spin "communications security" away, he must live in Disneyland.
The Dod has their own huge sections on that matter, even already since decades, including:

-Communications Security Telephone Monitoring
-National Cryptologic School
-Communications Security (COMSEC)
-Communications Intelligence (COMINT)
-Data Sharing in a Net-Centric Department of Defense

just recently, also the CIA was conducting a secretive war game, dubbed "Silent Horizon", to practice defending against an electronic assault, with the help of the Institute for Security Technology Studies (ISTS) at Dartmouth College.
Among their sponsors:


-Dept. of Defense, Advanced Research Projects Agency
-Dept. of Defense, Air Force Research Laboratory
-National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
-US Army Communications Electronics Command Research
-US Army Research Institute for Environmental Medicine

Source:  http://www.ists.dartmouth.edu/about-sponsors.php


And here for newbies, more on the strong fusion between nanotechnology, nanoweaponry and the Pentagon:

Recognized military applications of Nanoscience:

# Ultrasmall, highly parallel, computers with multi-teraflop speed
# Image information processors, e.g., extraction and recognition# Lasers and detectors for weapons and countermeasures
# Optical (infrared, visible, ultraviolet) sensors for improved surveillance an targeting
# Integrated sensor suites for chemical and biological agent detection
# Catalysts for enhancing and controlling energetic reactions
# Synthesis of new compounds (e.g., narrow-bandgap materials)
# Designer materials with combinations of properties that do not currently exist
# high-density information storage devices, e.g., terabit/cm2 nonvolatile memory


Source:  http://www.nanosra.nrl.navy.mil/




Instead Schwarz dencides to distract with insults and is calling his critics "disruptors", "paranoid" or "naive".


On other questions, Schwarz didn't answer yet, he bites back with presidential attitude:

"Get off your lazy ass and find it yourself. We did."
"You got your answer. Now, we shoot back",
"you are time wasters. With me, your 15
minutes are up."
or
"You need to lay off the booze"




2)"...Do not have the time to educate you on why that
happened..."

partly answered. But "education" in one simple answer
would be better.

Schwarz still has to answer, who did the "highest bid", or quote from
his book.


3)
"...It has not existed since June 2003 when it became
COMMAXXESS. That entity is listed where it needs to
be and no place else...."

so where is COMMAXXESS listed then?
Question not answered.

Karl Schwarz also ignores again the results of the negotiations with Global Crossing.

Already in August 2003, Schwarz also confirmed in a letter, made available to the FCC archives, that his unlisted company COMMAXXESS, was "in negotiations with a firm that currently
provides security services to U.S. intelligence agencies to assure that current leaks and
threats will be eliminated and a new Global Crossing under new management and U.S.
ownership would protect national security. This is a firm that will not be going public
any time in the near future due to the nature of its work and clientele."

Source:  link to gullfoss2.fcc.gov


However Schwarz thinks, that cooperations who provide "security services to U.S. intelligence agencies" are no military- or intelligence contractors?
Fascinating. It's on record at the FCC, but Schwarz is not answering to "sloppy researchers", he prefers to spin and insult them away.




4)
"...That is her maiden name, Lois Jean Love, not a
fake name. Whomever suggested that to you is an
idiot..."

Question answered, with the benfit of a doubt.
Remember "wilsongate"?
Many private intel contractors receive fake-IDs.
But the rest was answered. Maybe unimportant to know.



6)
"...Why did you decide to use "tripod" as a host for a
company website? Response: because WCOM was
nosey and trying to get into our main servers and main
IP core routers...."

Schwarz didn't have any server savy guy in his "$415 million"-team??

Again, a fascinating answer.

8)
"...Can you explain, why it is very difficult to get
any background information or public records on him?
Response: yes and he still does. He lives in
South Carolina, I live in GA. We both prefer to keep
people out of our personal and business affairs, which
is quite legal by the way...."


Not answered. It's still hard to find info on Schwarz' lawyer.


11)
"...I would have that system removed if I were in
office and not allow any Israel spying on the U.S.
..."

Schwarz believess, that 10% of "Israel Seed Partners" into Chiaro and their
business strategy is no political or political conflict of interest for him.
But when is it? 20%, 40%, 98% ?

12)
".... Why do you ignore in your articles, that the
official story about flight 11, 175, 77 and 93 is a
LIE. These flights either did not exist, did not
depart or departed at different times, in opposite to
official story. Response: that is your opinion,
not ours. We have FAA people that have come forward
with some interesting facts...."


This is no "opinion", but a clear fact. We can provide
original screenshots from the time, when we first saw
these records. There even still up, but since some months with a lousy disclaimer.


Schwarz should better continue with his phantom contacts and bring these "interesting facts"!


"...We are forming a new third party and people from
all over the US are coming from all existing parties
to join our effort...
...Now, Nico, quit wasting my time and letting your
ego and paranoia get the best of you..."


Means, Schwarz ignores rigged e-voting machines.
The question was also only partly answered.




Here are the questions, which he partly answered more in a direct way:


 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/05/316680.shtml





5) Is it correct, that your partner companies connected with
-US Defense Communications Agency
-Israeli Air Force
-Israeli Venture Capital
Nechemia Peres, son to former prime minister, Shimon Peres


Response: No, that is not correct. Chiaro has not been a strategic
partner since 2001. Move on.

and can you explain these connections, means did you ever meet any of
these related "operations"?

Response: No, did not even have telephone conversations with them.

Schwarz however ignores, that in may 2002, "GlobalAxxess Holdings" was still seeking to combine the resources of Wil-Com aka Williams Communications (Tulsa, OKLAHOMA).
Williams Comm. was bought in 2001 by Tom T. Gores, of Los Angeles, once immigrated from Israel with his family, when he was 5.
In 2002, Wiliams Comm. took over Corvis Corp. (now Broadwing Corp. since 2004, BWNG)
 http://www.broadwing.com/bwngcorp/pages/faq.html

Corvis is yet another government contractor, but apparently not linked to Chiaro, so we have to believe Schwarz for now.
 http://www.broadwing.com/govt.html
 http://www.broadwing.com/govt-f1.html





7) How is Marylin M. Scwarz related to you?

Response: second wife, we divorced in 2002. I have known her since
Sept 1969.


8) Is it correct, that T. B. Patterson worked as your divorce and
business lawyer?
Can you explain, why it is very difficult to get any background
information
or public records on him?

Response: yes and he still does. He lives in South Carolina, I live
in GA. We both prefer to keep people out of our personal and business
affairs, which is quite legal by the way. My nanotechnology company
competes against Kellogg Brown & Root's CNI. Would you provide an open
door
to them? What they cannot fathom, they cannot disrupt. What they cannot
fathom, neither can you. My corporate structure and dealings are to keep
people like them, and you, out of my personal and business affairs. Quite
legal is the operative phrase.


---
partly answered, see above


9) Is your partner of GlobalAxxess.net, Chiaro Networks and his
founder, Dr. Eyal Shekel (ex-Israeli Air Force) in any form related to
business with Lockheed, Raytheon, TRW or Boeing?

Response: No, no connection whatsoever relating to me. Have never
met
the man, have never talked to him. I am intimately familiar with the
Chiaro
1.5 petabit routers that he invented a component of, a photonics optical
router component. He is a communications physicists, not Dr. Mendela. We
have had no relationship with Chiaro since 2001. Move on.



10) Is Jon Bayless, Director of Chiaro in Richardson, Texas, in any
form related to business with FAA, NRO, NSA or NIMA/NGA?

Response: Do not know Jon Bayless and our involvement with Chiaro
was
technology related, not relationships with their board members or VC firms
that financed the technology development.


11) How can you explain a business/political conflict of interest,
that the sponsor of Chiaro, "Israel Seed Partners" and his start-up
MobileAccess will install an US House of Representatives communications
system ?

Response: "Political conflict of interest?" Reaching and spinning
...for that has nothing to do with me. Are you paranoid? I would have
that system removed if I were in office and not allow any Israel spying on
the U.S. Recently joined a group that wants to have AIPAC declared a
foreign lobby - see www.cnionline.org < http://www.cnionline.org/, I am a
member. Does that answer your question, as pointless as the question is?



12) Are you using the campaign on revealing the "truth about 9/11"
in
any way as a revenge on private US military - or intelligence contractors,
who sabotaged you in the past?

Response: No, my activities are due to what they are doing to the US
and the world and raising the debate up to their level until they choke on
it. I have overcome many fold what they did to me in the past. It was
what
I did in the past that keeps me right in their face with the truth. Read
my
book or quit asking lame questions that waste time.

They run from me and my team. They laugh at you, Rosalee and Gerard.
Move
on.

13) Why do you ignore in your articles, that the official story
about
flight 11, 175, 77 and 93 is a LIE. These flights either did not exist,
did
not depart or departed at different times, in opposite to official story.

Response: that is your opinion, not ours. We have FAA people that
have come forward with some interesting facts. We do not buy the official
story either, but for reasons other than those your group seems to
believe.

14) Last, but not least. Why did you announce to run as president?
Are
you not giving people false hope, who are aware of rigged e-voting
machine,
furthermore why you ignore documents and plans of pending world war "4",
which might even start before the next election? Means, why you pretend,
that democracy still exist, instead already replaced by fascism? For
which
party do you wanna run? Is this decision really a protection strategy
et...
??

Response: No, actually people in the millions are standing up right
now for the first time in a long time due to my efforts and those of
others.
I have now done 2 TV shows (more coming), 111 radio shows and many more
scheduled. We will be announcing very soon an endorsement that tops 4
million people in a single group.

We are about to launch a plan to take back the elections. Black Box
voting
had a board member at my announcement May 2. They have read the plan I
developed and endorsed it once they read it. I did let them develop the
strategy for addressing the vote fraud and how to remedy that.

We are about to launch a 50-state plan to expose the sheer sleaze in our
government at the state and federal level.

Fascism is the problem and we will be dealing with that head on, out on
the
front lines instead of these endless emails and web posts that serve no
purpose. I announced to lift this discussion up to their level, not the
"waste of time" level most of the 9-11 groups are stuck on.

We are forming a new third party and people from all over the US are
coming
>from all existing parties to join our effort, including DNC and RNC. This
summer I speak before the Texas Constitution Party and some major Texas
Libertarians have joined our movement as have many others from every state
in the US. Have people already working on VT and NH, will be traveling
there soon.

It is not a protection strategy. I am putting my life on the line and so
are many others. We have full time armed security being put into place
at
multiple sites and more being put into place very soon after that...

Update 04.Jun.2005 17:01

Updater

Saturday, June 4th

Karl Schwarz still refused to answer:

:The link to a 737 with a wingspan of 115 ft 8 in
:Whether he is again claiming that an A3 has a wingspan of 48 ft
:The link to Bush's response to his letter of demand.
:Whether he is still blaming Flocco for the " typos " in your article.
:Why he claim to be presenting MIHOP evidence, while at the same time,
promoting views which claim S11 was due to the "negligence of a selected
few" and systematic "failures to prevent " it.
:Why he sent three bogus links in relation to your bogus 737 claim:
:Why he simultaneously claimed that the 737 was on the net and was not on
the net.
:what documentation he has in relation to his claims about the origin of
the Cheney hit. (That "someone told you " doesn't count.)
:The link to his earliest publication alleging Govt complicity in S11
:Any significant alleged fact in any of his "research" which does not
depend upon personal hearsay from you, but is verifiable through a checkable
source available in the public domain.


He furthermore still didn't disclose the name of the "firm", affiliated with US Intelligence,
which was in negotiations with his shell CommAxxess, successor of
Global Axxess.
He also didn't respond on why he's running as a president, ignoring rigged elections and e-voting machines and documents on plans for WW4, around neo con thinktanks.

He furthermore didn't disclose, where his attorney is registered.
He also clearly refused to explain, why his first company didn't have an own domain, but listed at tripod but came up with a hillarious explanation (see above)

We're waiting, Karl...

Schwarz caught with his pants down 06.Jun.2005 18:26

Gerard Holmgren

For the past week or two I've been having a list email debate with Schwarz, exposing what a pathetic liar he is. He's told so many whoppers during this debate, that I can hardly scratch the surface here, but I'll pick out one particular aspect as an example.

Recently, Tom Flocco's website published an article on behalf of Schwarz continuing Schwarz's ridiculous spin that "his team" has discovered parts of an A3 sky warrior at the pentagon as opposed to a 757.

Just to clarify things, I am by no means supporting the Govt story. In fact I played an important early role in helping to prove that no plane of anywhere near the size of a 757 could have possibly hit the pentagon.

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/witness.html
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/physical.html
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/1177.html

Schwarz's totally unsourced, hearsay driven claim of an A3 sky warrior is a pathetic attempt to co-opt those who know the Govt is lying into a false direction. You can see the Flocco article at

 link to www.tomflocco.com

However, this article is not the same as it was when it was originally published. Two important things have been changed. The original article contained two premeditated lies from Schwarz which were then changed after I confronted him about them on the list.

In the section where the article states the wingspans of an A3 and a 737 you will now see the correct figures - 72 ft 6 in and 93 ft to 112 ft 6 in , depending on the variety, respectively.

But this was not what the article originally contained. The reasons why Schwarz originally lied about these specifications will be best saved for a separate comment, and I'm not sure that people who are not fully up on all the details will understand the significance, but the important thing to note here is that Schwarz lied several times, and then told more lies to try to cover it up.

In the original article, the wingspan of an A3 was given as 48 ft. How does 72 ft 6 in become 48 ft, one might ask ?

In the original article the wingspan of a 737 was given as 148 ft. How does 93 ft become 148 ft ? Or alternatively, how does 112ft 6 in become 148 ft ? Why is only one figure given, for a craft which has multiple figures ?

These figures clearly cannot be typos. For some reason, Schwarz has deliberately understated the wingspan of an A3 and overstated the wingspan of a 737, hoping that casual readers, unfamiliar with the correct figures, would not check. Schwarz of course provided no links with the figures, as a further disincentive for curious readers to check the figures.

As I said before, I will save the likely motivation for these lies for a separate comment.

After I wrote to the list, pointing out these errors, Schwarz and I were having a private insult trading session, and I sarcastically asked him what was the wingspan of the two respective craft. Schwarz's reply was interesting. He gave me the correct figure for the A3 ( bear in mind that I had already exposed his incorrect figure to the list at this time), but yet another incorrect figure for a 737 - 115 ft 8 in.

In response I asked him two questions.

1) Why the article contained incorrect figures if he knew the correct figures
2)What link he could supply me for the new figure he had suddenly come up with for a 737

He completely ignored the second question, and in reply to the first said

"typos his end not "my BS", prick", clearly implying that he had given Flocco the correct figures and that Flocco had misrepresented him.

The answer was ludicrous. For a start, how could those figures possibly be typos ? Secondly, if the mistake was Flocco's, how could Schwarz possibly know and so confidently the state the reason why Flocco was so wildly out from what Schwarz had told him? Thirdly, in an article which contains no other typos, we are expected to believe that just those selected figures were so wildly out that the article would have been totally unreadable if the same standards had been applied to the rest of it.

So in response, I asked to him to confirm that he was indeed claiming that he had given the correct figure to Flocco and that Flocco had misrepresented him. He refused to reply. Since then, I have asked the same question another 6 times, and each time he has refused to reply.

If Flocco really had so wildly misrepresented him, Schwarz would not be sitting there in sullen silence, refusing to confirm or deny. So its clear that after I exposed the "error" - or more correctly the lie - Schwarz originally intended to replay Flocco's trust by pinning the error on him if he could get away with it, but then back peddled slightly when he realized how thoroughly I was documenting his replies.

Meanwhile, he had supplied a link for the 737 figure, with the snide remark
"have you thought about www.boeing.com you researcher you ?

This was my reply.

"Indeed I have, but for those present who can't be bothered going past the front page, which is the link you gave and actually going to the technical specifications section

 http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family/technical.html

I'm sorry to have to inform you that it says 112 ft 7 in. for 737 900 and 800

And this link

 http://www.answers.com/topic/boeing-737

lists other varieties which are 93 ft. So what was the link for 115 ft 8 in ? "

In reply, Schwarz sent the same link again, trying to pretend that it was a different link, by tacking the completely meaningless words "particular model" on to the end of the link.

I pointed out that this was just the same link, and again asked for a correct one.

He then came up with another completely bogus link, one which contained no such figure, but managed to waste more of my time, because it was a lengthy article and I read through it several times to make sure that no such figure was mentioned. Upon sending this link , he crowed victoriously about what a dill I was, as if the previous two bogus links were erased from history.

When I pointed out that this link also contained no such figure, he then lied again, claiming that it did, and again crowing what an idiot I was.

When I again insisted that it did not, he suddenly flushed that one down the memory hole too, insisting that he was not going to do my work for me, and that if I couldn't find the link , that was my problem.

He claimed that it was "there" (somewhere) and the fact that I couldn't find it showed what a crappy researcher I was and he wasn't going to supply it.

When I insisted further, he then suddenly claimed that it came from a source which wasn't linked on the net anyway, which showed what an idiot I was for assuming that it was.

When I asked to clarify the contradiction between his insistence that the link was "there" somewhere, and the sudden back flip to the position that it wasn't, he refused to reply.

I've now asked for the link about 20 times in the list debate. He now simply refuses to answer. I actually did a thorough google search anyway, and found no such specs for a 737.

So to summarize:

His original article contained two premeditated lies. When these were exposed, he told two more to try to cover them, firstly that they were typos, secondly that the mistake was Flocco's.

Then he made another error for whatever reason, and then tried to cover this by sending a bogus link. When that was exposed, he sent the same link, clumsily trying to disguise it as a different one. When that was exposed he sent another bogus link. When that was exposed he lied that it was actually correct. When that was exposed he claimed that it wasn't his responsibility to supply any documentation for his claim, but it was on the web if I looked for it. When that was challenged he suddenly claimed that it was a non web source. When I asked him to clarify his position he refused.

Now - what I've just outlined is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the whoppers he's been telling, and the total bankruptcy of any claim he has to be doing anything remotely resembling "research". He just makes stuff up, and tries to sell it through a personality cult of froth and self promotion. Jared Israel once used the wonderful phrase "bombast and swagger" as Mike Ruppert's substitute for real research, and I can't think of a better phrase to describe Schwarz.

As I said, the whoppers are too many to list here, but I thought that by focusing on that particular thread it might provide a telling demonstration of what a shallow fraud this idiot is.

Why Schwarz lied about the A3 06.Jun.2005 18:27

G

Having established that Schwarz told a calculated lie in citing the wingspan of an A3 as 48 ft, when he knew it was 72 ft 6 in, we ask - why did he tell these lies ?

For anyone who had examined the arguments, it's been obvious since mid 2002 that whatever struck the pentagon was much smaller than a 757. The proof for this did not derive from any direct evidence about what the object was, rather it came from solid proofs about what it could not have been.

Schwarz played no role whatsoever in contributing to these proofs, and no role whatsoever in distributing the work of those who did, or in arguing the proofs in public forums to help establish the evidence in people's minds beyond its early "loony fringe " status.

By the time that Schwarz suddenly appeared as self proclaimed hero, the situation was that there were a significant number of people who had known for some time that there was absolute proof that the 757 story was a lie. Exactly how many we can't say, but enough to provoke a continuing spin campaign from the supporters of the official story, and even for glimpses of the issue to occasionally be seen in mainstream media - usually cast in the role of the mad conspiracy theory which was in need of debunking.

It would have been clear that there were large numbers of people who were never going to be converted to the official story no matter how ingenious the counter spin. So the complimentary strategy was to coopt as many as possible of these people in some way which limited their value in understanding and spreading the truth.

Schwarz would have been aware that many of these people would have been frustrated that such undeniable proof could have been blocked from the mainstream media and shunned by the political and legal system. They knew the truth - now they wanted to see signs of the political will to act upon it.

When I say "knew the truth" - they knew what *didn't* hit the building, but there was no convincing theory for the exact ID of what did. All we could say for certain, is that it was something quite small - probably not a plane at all, but if there were to be any chance that it was, then it must have been very small. There are some who contend that there was no striking object at all, and that it was done with planted explosives.

So, as these people cried out for a hero, they were vulnerable to somebody who could appear to move the issue along by claiming to have found the next level - exactly what *did* hit the building.

Clearly anybody fabricating such a claim would need to make the object as small as possible in order to appear as plausible as possible to this group of people. After all, one of the most striking proofs that it was not a 757 - although it is by no means the only one - is that such a large wingspan had zero chance of disappearing through such a small hole.


For those who have their thinking caps on, it's obvious that a plane with a 72 ft wingspan is no more plausible than a 125 ft wingspan. However, it is inevitable that there will be some, swept up in the excitement of a new development, who would be taken in by the prospect of a plane with a significantly smaller wingspan - being positively IDd from the site.

For the person concocting the scam, its obvious that the smaller they can make the wingspan, the more people will be taken in.

IMO, a 48 ft wingspan is still not plausible, but there is no doubt that there would some who wouldn't buy a 72 ft wingspan, but might accept a 48 ft wingspan.

And Karl Schwarz does not write for the critical thinker and meticulous checker. He writes for the casual reader, the agenda driven, the stupid, the careless and the inexperienced. I don't use all of these terms pejoratively. In the case of someone who, only a few weeks ago, became aware of the no 757 evidence and was new to web activism and didn't have the experience to know that you have to check for bullshit - and the first stage of that is to carefully check verification standards - and wouldn't conceive of the idea that someone pretending to expose the truth about Sept 11 is actually trying to cover it up - they could easily fall for the shallow unreferenced hearsay that characterizes Schwarz's writings. I know this from experience. When I was new to this, I initially fell for the writings of Mike Ruppert, a very similar sort of writer with similarly poor standards, and it took time before I gained the experience to see through him.

Fortunately, I had the contrasting example of Jared Israel www.tenc.net a writer who is meticulous with his verification standards to help me learn how real researchers put their information together.

So Schwarz is writing for the kind of reader who would not dismiss something because of its lack of verification standards and who would not think to check for themselves whether his alleged facts were correct. They simply wouldn't imagine that someone could tell such a blatent lie and expect to get away with it.

By lying about the wingspan of the A3 - making it out to be much smaller than it really was, Schwarz aimed to make his claim to have identified the object as plausible to as many people as possible.

Of course, I can't prove beyond doubt that this was his motivation for lying, its simply the most logical deduction I can come with up. The only person who knows for absolute certain why he lied is Schwarz, (and anybody else who may have conspired with him) and he's not going to tell us.

He's still desperately pleading that it was a typo. Heh !

72 ft 6 in being accidentally mistyped as 48 ft !

Why Schwarz lied about the 737 06.Jun.2005 18:29

Gerard Holmgren

We have established that Schwarz told a premeditated lie about the wingspan of an A3, in a manner calculated to give the impression that it was a much smaller craft than what it actually is. I have suggested a likely motivation - to try to make the A3 seem as plausible as possible to the uncritical reader, given the small hole in the pentagon wall.

We have also established that Schwarz told a premeditated lie about the wingspan of a 737. The correct wingspan is 93 ft to 112ft 6 in, depending on the variety. Schwarz cited it as 148 ft. Once again, this cannot possibly be a typo. So here we see Schwarz now making a calculated effort to give the uncritical reader the impression that a 737 is a significantly larger craft than it really is. What could be the motivation for such a lie ?

The suggestion below is perhaps a little more debatable than the theory I offered in relation to his lie about the A3, but I think it is worth considering.

Just as the Pentagon no 757 evidence emerged from "loony fringe status" to now being accepted by significant numbers of people, it is clear that the proof that no big planes hit the WTC, pioneered by Webfairy,  http://thewebfairy.com/911 ) is now on the same path. Its progress in the minds of the many is still embryonic compared to that of the pentagon issue, but there is no doubt that it has taken huge strides in the last year, and is now causing defenders of the official story some serious alarm.

So much so, that the half truth compromise stories have already appeared. For example, the ridiculous "pod" theory which contends that they were large jets but just adapted to fire missiles. In order to try to cover the trail of truth which WF has blazed, the debunkers are already reduced to at least conceding that that they were not the planes we've been told (which is something I suppose ).

Note: For those not familiar with this work, which I believe to be probably the most important S11 discoveries so far, there were no planes hitting the WTC.
The Nth tower object doesn;t even look like a plane

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/planevideos.html

and the Sth tower object which superficially looks like a large passenger jet, is in fact a fake video. Its a movie. No planes hit any buildings. It was a war of the worlds con job.

 link to thewebfairy.com

The irony of the pod theory is that it was WF who first noticed the anomaly in the shape of the "plane", and after suffering endless ridicule on this, as well as the rest of her work, others then suddenly took that tiny aspect of her work, called it the "pod", extrapolated it into a whole theory and wrote WF and the rest of her work out the story, thereby claiming the "pod" to be their "smoking gun" discovery.

Schwarz has been as vicious in his denunciation of WF as any of the debunkers. And he has joined the "substitute large plane " bandwagon in opposition to the pod people, by claiming that the Sth tower object is a 737.

Once again, the spinners are at least forced to admit that it wasn't the plane we've been told, so they are retreating to the next level of defence.

In order to examine why Schwarz would find it advantageous to deliberately overstate the wingspan of the plane which he is claiming hit the WTC, it becomes necessary to look at one of the favourite counter spin arguments which has been used against WF by those who support the idea that it was a large plane - if not a 767, then at least one of similar proportions. Some of these debunkers are happy to concede that it may not have been the plane which the govt tells us, or perhaps not even a 767, but contend that it was at least a plane of very similar size.

Their argument is that the slash in the WTC approximately matches the dimensions of a 767 wingspan. Indeed it does. As I've argued in other places, and am happy to argue here again if necessary, the approximate 767 wingspan dimension of the slash is actually proof that it could not have been a plane of that size, and if anybody wishes to have that argument again, I'm happy to prove it yet again.

But leaving that aside for the moment, what is relevant to the question of why Schwarz lied to inflate the size of a 737 wingspan, would appear to be that by bringing the 737's alleged wingspan much closer to that of the 767, and much closer to the dimensions of the WTC slash, Schwarz is able to argue that the wingspan of a 737 is close enough to the size of the slash in the WTC.

Thus he is able to still use the debunker's favourite argument against WF, while simultaneously appealing to those who accept, or at least suspect that it something other than the flights we are told hit the buildings.

So Schwarz is setting himself up as the "discoverer" of what really hit both the pentagon and the WTC, in a manner which satisfies both those who refuse to accept that it was all a war of the world's con job and those who accept MIHOP at some level.

Once again, my theory as to why Schwarz lied about the 737 is not absolutely provable, but I think it fits the pattern of his spin quite well.

So what have is this.

Schwarz told a premeditated lie to inflate the size of a 737 and reduce the size of an A3.

The lie about the A3 makes his spin on the pentagon object appear to the uncritical reader to be more plausible.

The lie about the 737 makes his spin on the WTC object appear to the uncritical reader to be more plausible.

Again, we can't be certain exactly why Schwarz lied, because he wont tell us. He's still desperately pleading that it was a typo.

Heh! 93 ft gets mistyped as 148 ft ?

112 ft gets mistyped as 148 ft ?

112ft 6 in get mistyped as 148 ft ?

Karl Schwarz - arms dealer or liar or both. 06.Jun.2005 18:32

Gerard Holmgren

For those who couldn't stand wading through to the end of that crud by Flocco on behalf of Schwarz,

 link to www.tomflocco.com

its worth a read because the last section is quite interesting.

This could be just another piece of spin from con-man Schwarz, but let's just assume for the moment that he's telling approximately the truth. If so, then it reveals that Schwarz is an arms dealer - a peddler of death. It appears that his fury against the Bushies is basically a fit of pique that rival dealer of death Lockheed- Martin got a contract ahead of him.

This is what the article says.

[[Schwarz is the CEO of a company which designs remote control/UAVs for the U.S. Army and had a $392 million dollar Defense Department order for 32 UAVs canceled "because they would see too much over in Iraq, and because we could put in a fleet of them for what our competition was paying for a couple."

Lockheed-Martin's Missiles and Fire Control Systems UAV used in Iraq is called the Predator, which costs $45 million for each unit, has three sensors and requires a crew of 55 individuals to operate one of them, according to Schwarz.

"Our Project Medusa has 11 high-powered sensors that can all operate simultaneously, can stay aloft at least 24 hours, has the world's most advanced hyper-spectral system augmented by two technologies to speed up pixel analysis and detect minute anomalies in the field of view (FOV) if the operator is paying attention or not, or if his human eyes cannot even see the detail that the software detects and highlights for the operator to zoom in on," said the UAV corporate CEO.

"A crew of 55 is required to operate 5 Medusa Skypods simultaneously. A single pilot operator flies them from a single laptop or personal computer. In short, 55 operators running 55 high powered sensors with far more processing and pixel engine detection power versus 55 operators running a single Predator and only one sensor capable of running at a time. The five Medusas cost about $65 million each but have far more technology capabilities and at any given time cover a far larger area with more visual assets, " said Schwarz.

"In short, they are not toys. They even have AIM 100 lasing devices and can light up targets up to 30 miles in all directions fro air strikes, artillery, mortar, or helicopters to dispose of problems...The combined area of coverage, and the number of troops they could possibly protect if all of the pet [Defense Department] aerostats were airborne at the same time, or not riddled full of machine gun holes, is about the area that a single Medusa Skypod covers...we are at least one to two years ahead of Lockheed in HAA technology...To my group it was an honor to have been asked and we proved we could deliver only to get jerked around by bureaucrats for months protecting pet projects [like the vastly inferior Lockheed Predator]. (One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas: A Conservative Republican Speaks Out, by Karl W. B. Schwarz, Reichenbach Publishing Company, 2004, p. 379 [821 pages])

Karl Schwarz is concerned that the Defense Department is protecting favorite pet projects instead of seeking the very best equipment to provide air security and support for America's young warriors: "We also turned down some business to have the priority slot available, for we surely thought someone in our Army would care about saving more lives."

"They didn't want civilians involved because the army would have to hire us to show them how to operate the UAVs, he said, offering further that "they had a fellow named John Geddes who was totally unable to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of our Medusa system versus the Predator system made by Lockheed-Martin--one of their pet projects group."

Schwarz added, "and all this remote control/UAV testing was being done at Fort Collins-Loveland Airport around the same time the A-3 Sky Warriors were being refitted before September 11!"

"They were watching every move I made when I was at Fort Collins," said Schwarz, adding "they also had a lot of freight hangers and warehouses--a lot of regular warehousing, which I thought strange for a small civilian airport." ]]

Boo hoo ! KS lost a $392 million contract to kill people, because of the corrupt Admin, and now he's out for revenge.

As I've been saying for a while, everyone and their dog is going to try to use S11 for their own agenda and this includes some people who are just as bad as those who carried it out, and are just bitter that they're not getting their share of the action. These people will construct their own version of the truth - one which may contain such elements of truth as are convenient to their agenda - one which targets their political enemies. In Schwarz's case this is the admin which screwed him out of $392 million worth of corpses. Nice guy.

Unless it's the lesser crime of just more self -aggrandizing bullshit.

So that's our choice about what to believe about Karl Schwarz - arms dealer or liar. Actually, we've already shown him to be a liar anyway. The only question is whether he's also an arms dealer. Even assuming he isn't, his pretence to be one tells us something about the person.

Grand dreams of being a big arms dealer in competition with Lockeed-Martin !

so what has he done ? 06.Jun.2005 21:29

brad

Interview of Karl Schwarz
John Stadtmiller Radio Show
April 8, 2005
www.rbnlive.com archives
We have, just in the last 72 hours, received not one but two new videos of 9/11. One of them was shot from the East River side, from way over across the river. The guy has actually zoomed in when the first building was hit. And then for some inexplicable reason, he zoomed out and did not get a real good image of the second plane coming in. But he did get a real good shot of the explosion that was set off. He was evidently at an elevated position, somewhere on the eastside of the East River. And that video is in the process of being picked apart and analyzed right now.

- This was released April 8th of 05, so where is the incredibly sharp TV quality you ask ???
- right here...
-  http://karlschwarz.com/candidate.html
- thumbnials !!! (HA HA )

About 3 - 3 ½ weeks ago, we became aware - because it was inserted in a movie - we became aware of some other footage of 9/11 that is not out here spreading around on any of the websites.
*You know, nobody has picked it apart. Nobody has analyzed it. *
And we finally found out where that video came from. We tracked down its producer. We tracked down the guy who shot it. We know exactly where he was standing when he shot it. And what got his attention was, of course, the impact on the north tower. He was filming that. And we are talking about some incredibly sharp TV quality video. When he zoomed in on the north tower, you can actually see five people jump out the windows where flames were leaping from those windows. You can actually tell what color slacks they were wearing, what color shirt - you know that type of imaging and that type of clarity. But he just happened to have kept his camera trained on that. He zoomed back out. All of a sudden, here comes streaking in that second plane that impacted the south tower.

- Karl says he became aware of the video 3 weeks before this interview in Apr 05...
 http://911index.0catch.com/video-flight175.html

- original is here is did right after the Cheney video came out, probabally a year ago...
 http://911index.0catch.com//cheney-2nd-hit.html
- I cant afford to upgrade my 850Mhz processor, but Karl and his millions cant do better than these
- thumbnails, then he calls us amateurs ? (HA HA HA)


Now so far, I've looked at every one of the videos there is out there. We've analyzed it. And all we've been able to come up with is it is a type of plane that has two engines under the wings. But you couldn't blow it up and actually verify what it was. You couldn't tell if it was a 737 or a 767. In this new video, we have 39 individual frames of this airplane, as it is closing in from the field of view, you know what the lens is seeing, and impacting the building. Thirty-nine individual stills of this plane. So we have some very good imaging - looking right up at it. And there is some interesting things to disclose about that plane.

- Karl can tell all that from his thumbnails ?
- He has better eyes than I do...


we are analyzing each one of those thirty-nine images. We know exactly where this photographer was standing. So we can measure the base - from the base of the World Trade Center to his footprints. We can measure the height of the impact and calculate the hypotenuse, simple geometry, very accurately. And we are going to superimpose over this particular airplane what a 737 and a 707, modified with two engines instead of four. And also, a 767 looks like. And I think when those people - we've already distributed this out. And we've got some experts working on what I've just described. When people see the answers to that right there in front of their eyes, I think they are going to understand to what extent we've all been lied to. And some people in Washington and some people in New York City have an awful lot of answering to do.

- Still waiting ??? (so what was the hypotenuse ?)

=========================

JS: The story by Jon Carlson, "WTC Jet Engine Confirmed Not from Boeing 767." Karl, have you seen this one?

KS: Yes, Jon Carlson is one of the researcher who has been working with me for about the last nine months - of trying to dissect out and prove that the visible jet engine components laying around out there in New York City, and also down at the Pentagon, don't jibe with the official story.


- So where is the confirmation ? (hence the title?)


[... ] [the Pentagon]

KS: The A3 Skywarrior is the only smaller airplane. We're talking smaller than a 757, 767, smaller than a 737 that has twin engines hanging under the wings. We have found eyewitnesses that saw the plane. And they said it had two engines hanging under the wing, that it was much smaller than a 737. Every time you see Southwest Air - 737s. That's what they fly. The only other airframe out there that is till operational is an A3 - a process of elimination. Then we went back - you remember when that picture was taken at the Pentagon of the people carrying the wing out?

JS: Yeah

- NO NO ? ? I dont remeber seeing a picture of a wing? where is it ?
- Why are you holding it back ?

KS: There's a lot you can tell about the shape of that wing even though it is underneath that blue tarp. That wing is a configuration of an A3, not a 757.


- So where are the photos from UNDER the blue tarp ?
- Where did he get them ?
- Why hasnt he published them ?


JS: Well and Karl, using common sense, you know I am sitting here right now looking at pictures from the Pentagon and this is shortly after rescue and fire showed up. Where is the debris for a full sized aircraft? Where is it?

KS: Well they found a couple of seats. But guess how many seats an A3 has? Maximum number of seats is seven. The normal number of seats is five.

JS: Karl, I have seen...

KS: They only found several seats. And they only found two wheels.


- SEATS ? WHERE ? SHOW ME ONE F** PHOTO OF A SEAT AT THE PENTAGON ????
- trying to CONFIRM that a plane hit the pentagon are we?
- Lying to do it are we ?
- Until i see a photo of a seat at the pentagon, i consider this disinformation at its finest.


KS: There was one other component. You remember when they were doing the clean up, when FEMA was doing the clean up - not the National Transportation Safety Board but FEMA was doing the clean up over at the Pentagon. If you look real close at one of those photographs, not only do you see the rotor hub that we've been trying to identify for quite some time. In the background you can actually see part of the jet cowling. You can prove this from the diameter of that jet cowling, that that did not come off of a 757. It came off of a much smaller component. And Jon Carlson, who wrote that article, that you were citing on Jeff Rense, he actually went to a museum to track down whether there was actually a JP8D on display.

JS: And I'm looking at that photograph as we speak also.


- insert, this is what they are speaking of...
-
 http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

- Now, this guy goes to a museum and takes a photo of this....
 http://www.rense.com/general63/Display7.jpg
-

- and says that that THIS is that engine...
 http://www.rense.com/general63/Pentagon_JT8DC.jpg

- i dont see and engine at all, much less the ability to make out what kind of plane it came from.
- that is reaching at best. I could just as easily say its a missile casing
- so this is the research that is suposedly BETTER than ours ? HA !

- (I believe this is part of a trailer)
- Information on the trailer can be found here...
-  http://investigate911.bravehost.com/trailer.html

- i put this photo on physics911 in febuary of 2004...
 http://physics911.ca/modules/myalbum/photo.php?lid=23
-

KS: And he went and took multiple photographs of that particular jet engine. And then we started tracking it from there. And the funny thing is, as soon as we raised all these issues about content blocking, all of a sudden content blocking was lifted.

------------------


Two air traffic controllers came forward and started talking. Both of the flights that took off that supposedly hit the World Trade Center were actually directed to the east and they disappeared in a single sweep of the radar out over the Atlantic


We have a report of an airplane crash on the Kentucky - Ohio border." Not Pennsylvania, where 93 went down. We're talking about the Kentucky - Ohio border. And that's what he was describing. And then he was shut up

- So where are they? Who are they? has the FBI interviewed them ?
- ive seen absolutely nothing but claims from someone with a shady background.
- Where is the report of the plane crash ?

 http://physics911.ca/modules/weblog/details.php?blog_id=60

tarp
tarp

Who else is Karl schwarz selling weapons to ? 12.Jun.2005 15:42

Gerard Holmgren

In an earlier post "Karl Schwarz - arms dealer or liar " , I alluded to the fact that Schwarz is an arms dealer. Of if he's not, then he's lying, boasting about an imaginery atcivity - one which he obviously considers to be worthy.

When questioned about this during the email debate, to which I earlier referred , Schwarz claimed that the purpose of this business venture was actually patriotic - to save American lives. That's right. The $392 million involved had nothing to do with it. Of course...

Let's assume once again that when boasting about this deal, Schwarz is in the unfamiliar territory of telling the truth. If so, then the following excerpt from his spin is interesting. Bear in mind that it is made in the context of Schwarz complaining that he lost a contract to sell 32 UAV's to the US army. You can see that in my earlier post, where I quote Schwarz more fully.

But having made that claim, Scwarz also complains

[["We also turned down some business to have the priority slot available, for we surely thought someone in our Army would care about saving more lives." ]]

Other business ? So someone else - other than the US army wanted to buy these UAV's which Schwarz claims are at the cutting edge of high - tech warfare.
And it appears that Schwarz was perfectly willing to sell to them, and only turned the offer down because he thought that the US army had already spoken for his full production capacity. And when that deal fell through, it was too late to rescue the other "business".

Perhaps, I've misinterpreted the statement, and there's a more innocent explanation? Well if so, Schwarz is less than keen to supply it.

Because before posting this, I asked Schwarz 3 times to explain the statement. I got silence. In my third request, I warned him that it was his last chance to submit an alternative explanation, otherwise, I'd publish the apparent admission by Schwarz - indeed boasting, rather than admission - that he's not only an arms dealer, but that he'll sell to anyone.

So here we have an aspiring President, who is an arms dealer, doesn't care who he sells to, and doesn't consider it his duty to disclose to his would be subjects and underlings who he's selling to.

Does this sound familiar ?

Myself, I think most of it just bullshit. Given the hilarious "response" to Madame Karnak, and his total buffoonery in handling the questions posed by Nico and myself, it's hard to imagine this idiot being a high flying arms dealer.

But what is relevant is that this person is either extremely evil or an habitual liar - and quite possibly both. And he's making some rather big claims about S11 - like finding what actually hit the pentagon and what really hit the WTC.

Schwarz's gutter character wouldn't matter in relation to that stuff if he had solid independent evidence, checkable in the public domain. Such evidence transcends the character or reputation of the person who digs it up. For example, If I was a shady character, it wouldn;t make any difference to the fact that the BTS records don't show AA11 or 77. You can check it in the public domain. If Jared Israel was a shady character, it wouldnt have any effect on the validity of the documentation he exposed on the mythical Langley scramble. If Rosalee Grable was a shady person, it still wouldnt put a plane into the Nth tower video.

Conversely, even if all of us were known to be of exemplary character, it would still be worthless hearsay for any of us to claim " I know this because because sources who cannot be named for security reasons have come forward ". The supposed evidence then becomes nothing more than a personality cult - to trust or not to trust the person making the hearsay claims.

So with schwarz, we have the worst of both worlds. A gutter level liar, involved in shady activities - to put it nicely - who presents no evidence other than his word - for anything.

As we've seen, his word as worth about as much as the three bogus links which he trierd to pass off as containing his false specifications for a 737.

Schwarz confirmed In-Q-Tel connection 21.Jun.2005 11:54

ewing2001

Karl Schwarz finally revealed the name of the "firm", close to an intelligence agency, which was in negotiations with his company, as mentioned above and archived in his own letter at the FCC.

It was In-q-tel ( http://www.in-q-tel.org/), at least that's what Schwarz claimed today.
I didn't alter anything of his answer.


--- Karl W B Schwarz < [email protected]> wrote
[June 21, 2005]:

> In-Q-Tel, CIA venture capital arm.
>
> We did not accept their deal.
>
> MOVE ON
>
> Karl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nico Haupt [mailto: [email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 11:39 AM
....




My personal case with Schwarz is therefore closed for now.

I'm not interested in 2-3 other vaguely answered questions anymore, because this was the more interesting piece for me.

For the record: Schwarz never really responded to Gerard Holmgren's questions.
5 weeks ago, 30 9/11 researchers got invited into a CC-group, confronting him with our questions.

Most of his answers showed, that Schwarz has personal and business reasons within the 9/11 "truth" movement. His profile should speak for himself.

nico haupt aka ewing2001

KISS = Keep It Simple, Stupid 02.Nov.2005 00:12

tired of the mountains of (dis)info

This 911 truth movement is constipated! "Follow the money"
has given way to "Follow the patsies". "Consider the source"
has become "Don't consider the content"!

Isn't it a well-known disinformation tactic that if a person's
work or info cannot be discredited, then the person must be?

Now that Karl's been labeled and smeared and derided and
"caught with his pants down" and had his bubble popped and
character assassinated here, all I want to know is this:

SPECIFICALLY what, if anything, is suspect about
the information and conclusions contained in
 http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf ????????????!!!!!!!!!!!
(In it, Karl shows that the jet engine and other aircraft
parts, which show up in photos of Pentagon wreckage, did
not come from a 757)

Schwarz is confused again... 19.Dec.2005 17:33

Nico Haupt

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/05/316680.shtml
9/11 -Karl Schwarz -Spook or Strutter?
Update December 2005

I'm glad to see, that Karl Schwarz is "resigning From The 2008 Race"

 link to www.shaunamckay.com

However Schwarz still seems to confuse too many things.

1)
Resigning means shutting the mouth, not spamming since then 24/7 via
his "PR manager" Jon Carlson.

2)
Schwarz writes in his "farewell", that he met me at "9-11-2004 event funded by Jimmy Walter, Confronting the Evidence"
That is true, but we spoke only some seconds and i didn't even identify myself, as far as i recall.
After that we corresponded either via other mailing groups and in some rare exceptions 1:1.

He claims, that i am "a chronic alcoholic".

That is untrue and actually very funny. I barely drink at all, have no time for it,
and can't even remember the last time, when i was drunk :)
He must have confused me with "Jolly Roger", who runs (or used to run) 9/11 Truth Action.
Jolly Roger was also at this event, obviously met Schwarz as well.

Roger is indeed a confessed alcoholic, but when clean, occasionally a brilliant writer.
Roger helped me distributing the "9/11 Science and Justice Alliance" brochures, but later got kicked out,
because he was too drunk :)

It speaks against Schwarz, if he doesn't get personalities straight.
I am sure many 9/11 truth activists and -researchers occasionally take drugs or psycho pharmacas, but i am
not one of them. I boycott pharma products almost a decade and don't take even aspirine.
I also still believe, the german beer tastes better than the US beer and i hate wine.

3)
Schwarz claims, there is a "webfairy group".
I am not aware that Webfairy aka Rosalee Grable ever surrounded a group regarding her topics around her.
Possibly also because she was sabotaged of doing so.
Actually the group, which she succesfully runs right now, is Planehuggers Yahoo, and the associates, Schwarz might
refer to, are not even members of this group.

It is however true, that Grable is still member of "9/11 Science and Justice Alliance", where we respectfully
allow any kind of scientific analysis, even if some members respectfully disagree.
I was co-founder of this group, in 2002/03, together with Jeff "Plaguepuppy" King, who was one of the most
impressive speakers of this Jimmy Walter event.
Grable furthermore moderates or participates in other groups, which she doesn't own, but works as a respectful correspondent.
It's also true, though not mentioned by Schwarz, that i respect Grable's research very much and do not tolerate smear campaigns against her research.


4)
Schwarz continues to claim, that he is not an "arms dealer".
He says, that "we did not sell anything to the Department of Defense".

Ironically this is what Schwarz contradicts by himself:
"...My connections to defense and intelligence related persons are communications security based or nanotechnology...."

Here he confirms his contacts to defense.
Since Schwarz claims, he is a specialist in nano science,
he obviously refers to nanotechnology as an important part of the Department of Defense, including Nanoweaponry.
In 2001 the US invested 125 million USD in nanotechnology initiatives for the Department of Defense (DoD), since then growing.

Schwarz furthermore still ignores, that he confirmed on June 21, 2005, that he was in negotiations with In-Q-Tel, a CIA venture capital arm.
He stated: "We did not accept their deal".

5)
Schwarz says, that i found a "Karl Schwarz" in Germany who was involved in Lockheed test flights and claims,
i confused this Schwarz with him.
That is untrue. Actually i implied, that the "US Schwarz" seems to have turned into a parody of this "german schwarz",
because as i wrote correctly, this german Schwarz "is interestingly a turbine specialist as well"

I asked this as a question and pulled it of my list, when he explained, that he is not associated with him.
Schwarz is confusing questions with conclusions.

6)
Schwarz continues to think, that his lies are becoming stronger by continuing a character association with the lie,
that i am "a man who stays drunk more than he does sober".

I will give him here the benefit of a doubt and still believe, he confused me with Jolly Roger.
He can trust me on the following:
Every ny911truth activists who meanwhile do not agree with me anymore, including board members of 911truth.org,
who met me dozens of time, would have picked up the same character assassination against me, if true :)


7)
Schwarz quotes Einstein: "insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results"
I am not aware, that i did anything "over and over again".
Actually my weakest link is, that i am interested in too many things at the same time and currently still too busy
with team8plus.org to confront an unimportant con artist like Schwarz again.

8)
Schwarz thinks it is somehow 'patriotic' to run for office, but still can't explain, how he wanted to deal
with rigged e-voting machines from Sequoia, ES+S and Co, plus the de-facto fascist situation in this country.
Schwarz is a false hope campaigner, deceiving his naive supporters into sophisticated garbage, which has nothing to do
with honest 9/11 research or -activism.

9)
Schwarz claims, he was "the only person at the 9-11-2004 event that presented new information"

Actually i think the opposite is true.
He brought the oldest stuff.
I still think, his book is plagiarizing an almost 4 year old book, named
"Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy, Saudi Arabia and the Failed Search for bin Laden"
by Jean-Charles Brisard, Guillaume Dasquie.
 http://tinyurl.com/dfgvz


Most of his chapters on oil pipeline projects and related oil price manipulations is based on the research by Brisard and Dasquie,
two intelligence specialist, including their strong focus on Bridas, also picked up by Schwarz.
Some chapters even seemed to have been written in the same order like "Forbidden Truth".
Maybe his readers didn't buy this book at the time of its release, otherwise they wouldn't have wasted time
with Schwarz' book.

10)
With all these confusions and plagiarizations, Schwarz might still deceive some followers, but the majority woke up on him already.
I am not sure what else to expect from someone who confuses wingspan sizes or "earthlink" with "earthlings", but maybe some more insults,
especially when he will speak out at WING TV in January 2005 :)

Happy holidays

 

www.stewwebb.com