Stew Webb and Tom Heneghan Radio 2017-02-25
Stew Webb Radio
Stew Webb and Tom Heneghan Radio 2017-02-25
Stew Webb Radio
911 Treason against the American People Reopened
The “Fake” Phone calls
By Tom Heneghan and Stew Webb
Please listen to Feb 26 2017 Radio Program now playing on StewWebb.com
There seems to be a bit of controversy in the so called “9/11 Truth Movement” on whether the phone calls from the planes were fake or not. The most well known proponent of this theory is David Ray Griffin and his take on the Barbara Olson phone calls to her husband Ted Olson. Let’s examine this closely and see if there is any merit to this “fake Phone calls” theory. I would hope that the 9/11 truth crowd is serious on promoting the truth, and solid evidence, being responsible and promoting well researched factual “evidence”.
According to David Ray Griffin (DRG)…
“Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI”
“The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights.”
“In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”
“According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.”
“Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.”
“And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.”
“This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.”
He is referring to this …..
But doesn’t mention that there were 5 other calls from the flight, presented at the same trial. How come?
5 other calls…made by someone on the plane….who? Who made these calls?
DRG says…”According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.”
However, according to the FBI, Ted Olson is being truthful.
The trial was in 2006. Ted Olson wasn’t on trial so there was no need to prove anything in regards to him or his phone calls. The entire FBI isn’t “in on it”. They contacted the next of kin of all the passengers of the flights, and all those receiving calls….the documents are here…..
Right from the start the FBI stated that Ted Olson didn’t know if the calls were cell phone calls or Airfone calls. His secretary Lori Keyton is the one that took these calls at first, not Ted Olson, and she states that they were collect calls, that means they were probably not from her cell phone and there should be operators that would confirm this. The FBI documents concerning this can be seen here….
The FBI interviewed Olson’s secretary Lori Keyton…..
From FBI Document:
“Keyton provided the following information:
“Keyton was working in Ted Olson’s Office this morning. She is regularly called there to cover the telephones. At approximately 9:00am, she received a series of approximately six to eight collect telephone calls. Each of the calls was an automated collect call. There was a recording advising of the collect call and requesting she hold for an operator. A short time later another recording stated that all operators were busy, please hang up and try your call later.”
“Keyton then received a collect call from a live operator. The operator advised that there was an emergency collect call from Barbara Olson for Ted Olson. Keyton advised that she would accept the call. Barbara Olson was put through and sounded hysterical. Barbara Olson said, “Can you tell Ted .. ” Keyton cut her off and said, “I’ll put him on the line.”
“Keyton advised that there is no caller identification feature on the phone she was using. Keyton didn’t know if Barbara Olson was calling from the phone on the plane or from her cell phone.”
So as you can see, Ted Olson has several witnesses backing up his story, one is his secretary, and others are the operators who put some of these calls through.
“Teresa Gonzalez, operator for AT&T Services AT&T, telephonically contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI to report an emergency phone call received by AT&T. After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agent and the nature of the interview, she provided the following information:
“Mercy Lorenzo, also an operator with AT&T, received a call from a female passenger on flight 77 requesting to be transferred to telephone number 202-514-2201. The female passenger advised the plane was being hi-jacked. Hi-jackers were ordering passengers to move to the back of the plane and were armed with guns and knives. Lorenzo indicated the pilot might not yet be aware of the take over of the plane.”
“Additionally, the number provided was the number of the passenger’s husband. He is a Sergeant and resides in Washington, D.C.”
Yes, that phone number is to the United States Solicitor General…just type in into google…
Ted Olson was not a “Sergeant” he was United States Solicitor General. And notice that link is to a debunkers site. Evidence shows the calls happened as Olson said, and there’s no evidence they didn’t, so why wouldn’t debunkers point that out? This nonsense of no planes, flyovers, missiles, and fake calls, and victims being “in on it” helps debunkers, Government apologists, and the very people/entities that so called “truthers” are claiming to expose. Those that promote this nonsense are assisting the very people they claim they are opposing.
So Ted Olson’s story is confirmed over and over again by people who don’t even know him.
DRG also says this…..
“And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.”
“This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.”
Yes, the FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and 2 years before the Moussaoui trial all this info was known to them, and the Department of Justice confirmed Olson’s story. DRG claims the FBI’s report “undermined” Olson’s claim to have received two calls from his wife. However this document seems to prove otherwise…..
“Event: Department of Justice briefing on cell and phone calls from AA Flight 77”
“Date: May 20, 2004”
“This work was conducted in support of the U.S. Justice Department’s criminal case against Zacarias Moussaoui.”
“While there was no direct evidence with respect to the “unknown calls,” interviews with recipients (especially Lori Keyton who was answering the phone in Ted Olson’s office on 9/11), plus interviews of family members of other Flight 77 passengers, has lead to the conclusion that all of these unknown calls were from Barbara Olson to her husband Ted’s office.”
“unknown” calls from Flight 77:
Who made these calls? According to DRG the Justice department admitted Barbara didn’t call Ted Olson….This is NOT TRUE!:
According to the Justice Department:
“all of these unknown calls were from Barbara Olson to her husband Ted’s office.”
So one might wonder….why didn’t they explain all this at the trial? My guess is….I think to use an airphone you either use a credit card and pay for it yourself, or you call an operator and have the other person pay as a collect call. Which seems to be what Beamer did, according to the operator that answered the call…..
“He told me that he had dialed zero to report his plane was being hijacked…”
If you use a credit card and pay yourself you dial the number yourself and a record from the airphone is then made. She did that once and it didn’t go through…you have the one recorded call, and the number dialed from the airphone. The others were made collect and therefor the operator dialed the number not the person using the airphone therefor the number called is unknown(not dialed on the airphone) but the time the airphone was used is known and recorded. By talking to the operators, Keyton, and the other family members it aint hard to figure out where these calls went………
“Mercy Lorenzo, also an operator with AT&T, received a call from a female passenger on flight 77 requesting to be transferred to telephone number 202-514-2201.
she received a series of approximately six to eight collect telephone calls.
The trial was in 2006, and the evidence presented was simply the calls. The airphone calls were classified as “unknown” because they were collect calls and no record from the airphone recorded the number dialed as the operator, ….not the person using the airphone, dialed the number. They could have gone ahead and presented the evidence to show who made these “unknown” number calls, as they already found out in 2004 as the documents show, but there was no reason to do that because Ted Olson wasn’t on trial, and it would be irrelevant to the case and a waste of the courts time. Anyway, that’s my guess.
DRG also says there weren’t any Airfones on American Airlines. Yea, that’s because they were being taken out of the aircrafts. In 2002. In order to take the Airfones out in 2002, they have to be in first,.. 9/11 happened in 2001.
American Airlines had AirFones in 2001:
“February 6, 2002 4:20 PM PST”:
“American Airlines will discontinue its AT&T in-flight phone service by March 31, a spokesman for the airline said Wednesday.”
“American will stop the service by March 31 and then take steps to remove the phones from its airplanes.”
DRG knows this, and has for years, as debunkers enjoy pointing out….
P4T, DRG himself, and debunkers all know this is false info…..
I have seen no evidence that supports the notion of “fake phone calls”. Only evidence that they are indeed real. If there is no evidence of fake phone calls it is irresponsible and rather outrageous to accuse people who lost loved ones on that tragic day of lieing or being “in on it”, simply to keep a faulty theory alive.
For years I’ve seen over and over the “Ted Olson is a liar” mantra put forth by the “truth” movement, led by DRG, when the evidence actually supports Mr Olson. A real big clue of someone not being “in on it” is when they, or a person close to them are dead. Like John O’Neill. Because of 9/11 he is dead. That is a pretty good clue he isn’t “in on it”. Ted Olson had a wife that is dead due to 9/11. DRG has no evidence he lied or is “in on it”, and he has no evidence that phone calls were faked. One may not like Olson or his politics, but to accuse him of “being in on it”, or to claim phone calls were faked, when there’s no evidence to support these claims, is extremely counter productive and IMO offensive.The evidence shows me she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. I prefer the “truth” movement focus on truth, and have it’s “facts” in order. Accusing victims of the attack as being “in on it” liars, when the evidence isn’t there doesn’t help a “truth” movement. It destroys it.
The Mother of All Lies About 9/11
Barbara Olson’s “Phone Call” From Flight 77
Copyright Joe Vialls, 27 March 2002
|This is a story about a little white lie that bred dozens of other little white lies, then hundreds of bigger white lies and so on, to the point where the first little white lie must be credited as the “Mother of All Lies” about events on 11 September 2001. For this was the little white lie that first activated the American psyche, generated mass loathing, and enabled media manipulation of the global population.
Without this little white lie there would have been no Arab Hijackers, no Osama Bin Laden directing operations from afar, and no “War on Terror” in Afghanistan and occupied Palestine. Clearly the lie was so clever and diabolical in nature, it must have been generated by the “Power Elite” in one of its more earthly manifestations. Perhaps it was the work of the Council on Foreign Relations, or the Trilateral Commission?
No, it was not. Though at the time the little white lie was flagged with a powerful political name, there was and remains no evidence to support the connection. Just like the corrupt and premature Lee Harvey Oswald story in 1963, there are verifiable fatal errors which ultimately prove the little white lie was solely the work of members of the media. Only they had access, and only they had the methods and means.
The little white lie was about Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator for CNN and wife of US Solicitor General Ted Olson. Now deceased, Mrs Olson is alleged to have twice called her husband from an American Airlines Flight 77 seat-telephone, before the aircraft slammed into the Pentagon. This unsubstantiated claim, reported by CNN remarkably quickly at 2.06 am EDT [0606 GMT] on September 12, was the solitary foundation on which the spurious “Hijacker” story was built.
Without the “eminent” Barbara Olson and her alleged emotional telephone calls, there would never be any proof that humans played a role in the hijack and destruction of the four aircraft that day. Lookalike claims surfaced several days later on September 16about passenger Todd Beamer and others, but it is critically important to remember here that the Barbara Olson story was the only one on September 11 and. 12. It was beyond question the artificial “seed” that started the media snowball rolling down the hill.
And once the snowball started rolling down the hill, it artfully picked up Osama Bin Laden and a host of other “terrorists” on the way. By noon on September 12, every paid glassy-eyed media commentator in America was either spilling his guts about those “Terrible Muslim hijackers”, or liberating hitherto classified information about Osama Bin Laden. “Oh sure, it was Bin Laden,” they said blithely, oblivious to anything apart from their television appearance fees.
The deliberate little white lie was essential. Ask yourself: What would most Americans have been thinking about on September 12, if CNN had not provided this timely fiction? Would anyone anywhere have really believed the insane government story about failed Cessna pilots with box cutters taking over heavy jets, then hurling them expertly around the sky like polished Top Guns from the film of the same name? Of course not! As previously stated there would have been no Osama Bin Laden, and no “War on Terror” in Afghanistan and occupied Palestine.
This report is designed to examine the sequence of the Olson events and lay them bare for public examination. Dates and times are of crucial importance here, so if this report seems tedious try to bear with me. Before moving on to discuss the impossibility of the alleged calls, we first need to examine how CNN managed to “find out” about them, reported here in the September 12 CNN story at 2.06 am EDT:
“Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN. Shortly afterwards Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon” … “Ted Olson told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters. She felt nobody was in charge and asked her husband to tell the pilot what to do.”
At no point in the above report does CNN quote Ted Olson directly. If the report was authentic and 100% attributable, it would have been phrased quite differently. Instead of “Ted Olson told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight personnel…”, the passage would read approximately:- Mr Olson told CNN, “My wife said all passengers and flight personnel…” Whoever wrote this story was certainly not in direct contact with US Solicitor General Ted Olson.
Think about it, people! If you knew or suspected your spouse’s aircraft had just fireballed inside the Pentagon building, how would you spend the rest of the day? Initially you would certainly be in deep shock and unwilling to believe the reports. Then you would start to gather your wits together, a slow process in itself. After that and depending on individual personality, you might drive over to the Pentagon on the off chance your spouse survived the horrific crash, or you might go home and wait for emergency services to bring you the inevitable bad news. As a matter of record, Ted Olson did not return to work until six days later.
About the last thing on your mind [especially if you happened to be the US Solicitor General], would be to pick up a telephone and call the CNN Atlanta news desk in order to give them a “scoop”. As a seasoned politician you would already know that all matters involving national security must first be vetted by the National Security Council. Under the extraordinary circumstances and security overkill existing on September 11, this vetting process would have taken a minimum of two days, and more likely three.
The timing of the CNN news release about Barbara Olson, is therefore as impossible as the New Zealand press release back in 1963 about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. As reported independently by Colonel Fletcher Prouty USAF (Retired), whoever set Kennedy up, accidentally launched a full international newswire biography on obscure “killer” Lee Harvey Oswald, without first taking the trouble to check his world clock.
It was still “yesterday” in New Zealand on the other side of the International Date Line when the biography was wired from New York, enabling the Christchurch Star newspaper was able to print a story about Oswald as the prime suspect in its morning edition, several hours before he was first accused of the crime by Dallas police.
If the CNN story about Ted Olson had been correct, and he really had called them about Barbara on September 11, then he would most surely have followed the telephone call up a few days later with a tasteful “one-on-one” television interview, telling the hushed and respectful interviewer about how badly he missed his wife, and about the sheer horror of it all.
There is no record of any such interview in the CNN or other archives. Indeed, if you key “Barbara Olson” into the CNN search engine, it returns only two related articles. The first is the creative invention on September 12 at 2.06 am EDT [0606 GMT], and the second is on December 12, about President Bush, who led a White House memorial that began at8:46 a.m. EST, the moment the first hijacked plane hit the World Trade Center three months before. CNN includes this comment about Ted Olson:
“In a poignant remembrance at the Justice Department, U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson referred to “the sufferings we have all experienced.” He made no direct reference to the death of his wife, Barbara Olson, who was a passenger aboard the American Airlines flight that crashed into the Pentagon…”
Regarding the same event, Fox News reports that, extraordinarily, Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson then said Barbara Olson’s call, made “in the midst of terrible danger and turmoil swirling around her,” was a “clarion call that awakened our nation’s leaders to the true nature of the events of Sept. 11.”
So Ted Olson avoided making any direct personal reference to the death of his wife. Clearly this was not good enough for someone somewhere. By the sixth month anniversary of the attack, Ted Olson was allegedly interviewed by London Telegraph reporter Toby Harnden, with his exclusive story “She Asked Me How To Stop The Plane” appearing in that London newspaper on March 5, thereafter renamed and syndicated around dozens of western countries as “Revenge Of The Spitfire”, finally appearing in the West Australian newspaper on Saturday March 23, 2002.
I have diligently tried to find a copy of this story in an American newspaper but have so far failed. The reasons for this rather perverse “external” publication of Ted Olson’s story are not yet clear, but it seems fair to observe that if he is ever challenged by a Senate Select Committee about the veracity of his claims, the story could not be used against him because it was published outside American sovereign territory.
Regardless of the real reason or reasons for its publication, the story seems to have matured a lot since the first decoy news release by CNN early on September 12, 2001. Here we have considerably more detail, some of which is frankly impossible. In the alleged words of US Solicitor General Theodore Olson:
“She [Barbara] had trouble getting through, because she wasn’t using her cell phone – she was using the phone in the passengers’ seats,” said Mr Olson. “I guess she didn’t have her purse, because she was calling collect, and she was trying to get through to the Department of Justice, which is never very easy.” … “She wanted to know ‘What can I tell the pilot? What can I do? How can I stop this?’ ”
But it is at this juncture that we finally have the terminal error. Though the American Airlines Boeing 757 is fitted with individual telephones at each seat position, they are not of the variety where you can simply pick up the handset and ask for an operator. On many aircraft you can talk from one seat to another in the aircraft free of charge, but if you wish to access the outside world you must first swipe your credit card through the telephone. By Ted Olson’s own admission, Barbara did not have a credit card with her.
It gets worse. On American Airlines there is a telephone “setup” charge of US$2.50 which can only be paid by credit card, then a US$2.50 (sometimes US$5.00) charge per minute of speech thereafter. The setup charge is the crucial element. Without paying it in advance by swiping your credit card you cannot access the external telephone network. Under these circumstances the passengers’ seat phone on a Boeing 757 is a much use as a plastic toy.
Perhaps Ted Olson made a mistake and Barbara managed to borrow a credit card from a fellow passenger? Not a chance. If Barbara had done so, once swiped through the phone, the credit card would have enabled her to call whoever she wanted to for as long as she liked, negating any requirement to call collect.
Sadly perhaps, the Olson telephone call claim is proved untrue. Any American official wishing to challenge this has only to subpoena the telephone company and Justice Department records. There will be no charge originating from American Airlines 77 to the US Solicitor General.
Even without this hard proof, the chances of meaningfully using a seat-telephone on Flight 77 were nil. We know from the intermittent glimpses of the aircraft the air traffic controllers had on the radar scopes, that Flight 77 was travelling at extreme speed at very low level, pulling high “G’ turns in the process.
Under these circumstances it would be difficult even reaching a phone, much less using it. Finally, the phones on the Boeing 757 rely on either ground cell phone towers or satellite bounce in order to maintain a stable connection. At very low altitude and extreme speed, the violent changes in aircraft attitude would render the normal telephone links completely unusable.
Exactly the same applies with United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed before reaching any targets. The aircraft was all over the place at extreme speed on radar, but as with Flight 77 we are asked to believe that the “hijackers” allowed a passenger called Todd Beamer to place a thirteen minute telephone call. Very considerate of them. The Pittsburg Channel put it this way in a story first posted at 1.38 pm EDT on September 16, 2001:
“Todd Beamer placed a call on one of the Boeing 757’s on-board telephones and spoke for 13 minutes with GTE operator Lisa D. Jefferson, Beamer’s wife said. He provided detailed information about the hijacking and — after the operator told him about the morning’s World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks – said he and others on the plane were planning to act against the terrorists aboard.” Note here that Mrs Lisa Beamer did not receive a telephone call from Todd personally, but was later “told” by an operator that her husband had allegedly called. Just another unfortunate media con job for the trash can.
As previously stated it is the Barbara Olson story that really counts, a view reinforced by the recent antics of the London print media. The photo at the top of this page is a copy of that printed in the West Australian newspaper. You only have to study it closely for a second to realize its full subliminal potential.
Here is a studious and obviously very honest man. The US Solicitor General sits in front of a wall lined with leather-bound volumes of Supreme Court Arguments, with a photo of his dead wife displayed prominently in front of him. Does anyone out there seriously believe that this man, a bastion of US law, would tell even a minor lie on a matter as grave as national security?
Theodore Olson’s own words indicate that he would be prepared to do rather more than that On March 21, 2002 on its page A35, the Washington Post newspaper printed an article titled “The Limits of Lying” by Jim Hoagland, who writes that a statement by Solicitor General Theodore Olson in the Supreme Court has the ring of perverse honesty.
Addressing the Supreme Court of the United States of America, US Solicitor General Theodore Olson said it is “easy to imagine an infinite number of situations . . . where government officials might quite legitimately have reasons to give false information out.”
Friday Feb 17 2017 Two Federal Whistle blowers Stew Webb Hit With Energy Weapon! Tom Heneghan Poisoned!
Center Israel Prime Minister BiBi Netanyahu (Right) Larry Mizel Organized Crime Boss Hog TARP Bank Bail Out Scamster.
Leonard Millman Organized Crime Boss Hog (Deceased 2014) turned over control of the Jewish MOB to Illuminati Satanic Baby Killer Larry Mizel.
Larry Mizel controls nearly One Hundred Trillion Dollars stolen from investors and the US Government including but not limited to Narcotics Importation into the United States and Narcotics Money Laundering and ISIS Terrorist Money Laundering.
(L) Norman Phillip Brownstein, (R) Larry Mizel both Directors of AIPAC known Espionage against the United States of America.
Larry Mizel’s known partners Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, George HW Bush, George W. Bush, Jeb Bush, Neil Bush, and more Organized Crime associates.
Lock Him Up Claw the Money Back.
1032. Sentencing Enhancement—”Three Strikes” Law | USAM …
Sentencing Enhancement—”Three Strikes” Law; …
you also should consider using it where a defendant’s criminal history
would support a life sentence …
These are just a few of the settlement cover ups with the US Justice Department and many are not listed.
Royal Bank of Canada
Great West Life
Great West Life Insurance
Great West Life
Great West Life Insurance company
National Acceptance Company
First National Acceptance Company
US President Donald Trump Press Conference February 16 2017
This is the second American Revolution in action, thank you Mr President. –
Stew Webb Federal Whistle blower
Robert Kennedy, Jr. at Trump Tower Robert Kennedy Jr., the son of the late New York Senator Robert Kennedy, will be chairing a commission on vaccine safety under the Trump Administration. He met with the President-elect at Trump Tower to discuss plans for the commission. Following the meeting Mr. Kennedy spoke to the press.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.Vaccine Autism Smoking Guns!
Your kind Contributions are very much appreciated thank you. – Stew Webb
FBI Sweep Puts US Media In Terror As Trump Prepares To Jail Top Reporters
By Stew Webb
I was able to confirm that this is happening and the report below is pretty much true and accurate.
FBI Sweep Puts US Media In Terror As Trump Prepares To Jail Top Reporters
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
An absorbing Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that a clear example of “if one gives someone enough freedom of action, they may destroy themselves by foolish actions” is now playing out in the United States after the US Department of Justice (DOJ), during the past 24 hours, unleashed 23 specialized teams of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents to the homes of many of America’s top journalists—and in preparation for the Trump Administration to begin jailing many of these reporters for their violation of 18 § 798 of the U.S. Code: Disclosure Of Classified Information that, in part, says: “Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates … or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes … any classified information … obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, a fortnight (two weeks) ago prior to his assuming office, then President-elect Donald Trump called on US lawmakers to investigate NBC News for leaking highly classified American intelligence information in what he believed was an orchestrated plot by certain “spy actors” (working in collusion with the mainstream media) to destroy his coming presidency—and that when the president of NBC News, Deborah Turness, was confronted about by the FBI yesterday, was swiftly removed from her position and abruptly transferred to Europe.
Knowing of what his own intelligence agencies were preparing to do against him once NBC News fired the “first salvo” against him (CIA order: “We’re Taking Traitor Trump Out Now”), this report continues, Trump (who says “Intelligence community giving out classified information to press ‘like candy’”), aided by former US Army General Michael Flynn (who was the US militaries top spy master), deployed a classic “Canary Trap” maneuver against these “spy actors” and their journalist abettors—and that is a method for exposing an information leak by giving different versions of sensitive information to each of several suspects and seeing which version gets leaked.
The main “bait” deployed in this Trump-Flynn “Canary Trap” maneuver, this report notes, was through an innocuous telephonic conversation General Flynn initiated with Federation Ambassador Sergey Kislyak after the Obama regime had placed sanctions on Russia—and that General Flynn correctly detailed the substance of by his stating: “It wasn’t about sanctions. It was about the 35 guys who were thrown out. So that’s what it turned out to be. It was basically, ‘Look, I know this happened. We’ll review everything.’ I never said anything such as, ‘We’re going to review sanctions,’ or anything like that.”
Nearly immediately after General Flynn had talked to Ambassador Kislyak, this report details, the first “bird” captured in this “Canary Trap” maneuver was The Washington Post associate editor David Ignatius—who built his career on repeating what his CIA sources tell him, and who in his 12 January column wrote: “According to a senior U.S. government official, Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, the day the Obama administration announced the expulsion of 35 Russian officials as well as other measures in retaliation for the hacking.”
Swiftly following David Ignatius into the Trump-Flynn “Canary Trap”, this report continues, were numerous other “birds” who have self identified themselves as being from every mainstream media newsroom in America—including The New York Times, who just yesterday published: “Phone records and intercepted calls show that members of Donald J. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and other Trump associates had repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election, according to four current and former American officials.”—and that the Kremlin responded to by stating: “Let’s not believe anonymous information. It’s a newspaper report which is not based on any facts.”
Not being understood by the American people about this New York Times “revelation”, SVR analysts in this report note, is that the CIA classifies every single Russian government functionary as an “intelligence official”—and that prior to the US presidential election, these voters knew that Trump had visited Russia, his now US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had extensive meetings with President Putin and other top Federation officials when he was CEO of Exxon, General Flynn had visited Russia, and Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, likewise, had extensive Russian ties due to his international election consulting business.
In point of fact, this report continues, by the same criteria the US mainstream media decries Trump, and anyone associating with him, for having “ties” to Russia, must also now include nearly every single top American corporation, their CEO’s, and executives who, likewise, regularly meet and have phone calls with Russian “intelligence officials”—including: Pfizer, Boeing, Ford Motor Corporation, PepsiCo, Procter&Gamble, McDonald’s, Mondelez International, General Motors, Johnson & Johnson, Cargill, Alcoa and General Electric, to just name a few.
As it would be “insane/beyond belief” for any normal person to believe that the tens-of-thousands of American citizens and business leaders who daily visit Russia (and make phone calls there too) are all “spies” working for the Federation, this report further notes, the truest reason for these US mainstream media journalists fanning the flames of “Russia hysteria” against Trump has nothing at all to do with reality—but, instead, has everything to do with their wanting him impeached from office.
In their zeal, however, to destroy Trump, this report continues, these US mainstream media journalists have blindly overlooked the most important fact in this war they’ve started against their president—and that is these unelected intelligence operatives who are leaking classified information to them work for President Trump, not the other way around.
And though a relatively small number of Trump’s unelected intelligence operatives have, indeed, been colluding with the US mainstream media to bring him down, this report says, these journalists, and their publisher leaders, have failed to notice at their peril that at their presidents side to command is, at least, 1,271 government intelligence organizations, 1,931 private intelligence companies (in 10,000 locations in the United States) who are presently working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence—and that when added together as a whole, includes over 854,000 Trump loyalists holding top-secret clearances, and who are sworn, and ready, to defend him
Also failing to be noticed by the masses of these US mainstream journalists, this report continues, is that the Trump-Flynn “Canary Trap” maneuver has already sprung—and as evidenced by President Trump secretly moving General Flynn to the most powerful, and secretive, American spy agency known as the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) nearly 48 hours ago.
It must be noted, however, this report states, that though the masses of these US mainstream journalists are gleefully believing they’ve destroyed General Flynn and seriously damaged Trump, nothing could be further from the truth—with the devastating backlash to come from President Trump against them being noted by too few “real/true” reporters, but who, in just a few articles, are warning of what is to come, and include:
1.) Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Glenn Greenwald warning these journalists: “In the spectrum of crimes involving the leaking of classified information, publicly revealing the contents of SIGINT — signals intelligence — is one of the most serious felonies. Journalists (and all other nongovernmental citizens) can be prosecuted under federal law for disclosing classified information only under the narrowest circumstances; reflecting how serious SIGINT is considered to be, one of those circumstances includes leaking the contents of intercepted communications.”
2.) Bloomberg News national security reporter Eli Lake warning these journalists: “Normally intercepts of U.S. officials and citizens are some of the most tightly held government secrets. This is for good reason. Selectively disclosing details of private conversations monitored by the FBI or NSA gives the permanent state the power to destroy reputations from the cloak of anonymity. This is what police states do.”
3.) Senior correspondent for The Week News Service Damon Linker warning these journalists: “America’s spies anonymously took down Michael Flynn…That is deeply worrying…Far too many Trump critics appear not to care that these intelligence agents leaked highly sensitive information to the press — mostly because Trump critics are pleased with the result.”
But too little, and too late, did these warnings come to the masses of these US mainstream journalists who have grossly violated the United States most powerful laws against leaking classified information, this report says, and as evidenced by the less than 24 hour period between when General Flynn was secretly moved to his new intelligence position by President Trump and the FBI teams that began sweeping up journalists in both New York City and Washington D.C.
Armed with what are called National Security Letters (NSL’s), this report explains, these FBI teams are presenting their targeted “Canary Trap” journalist “birdies” with an administrative subpoena issued by the President Trump’s federal government authorizing these agents to gather information for national security purposes—and that do not require prior approval from a judge, and if spoken, or written, of by the recipient means automatic imprisonment.
Most astonishing to note about what President Trump is doing in targeting these lawless journalists, this report continues, is that the “road guide” to what he is doing was, actually, created by President Obama—and though not known to the masses of the American people, had his US Department of Justice prosecute more government leakers than all US presidential administrations combined.
Unlike President Obama, though, this report notes, President Trump has something on his side no other American president in history has ever had in battling against illegal government intelligence leaks to journalists—a stunning new poll showing that the American public now says that their trust and confidence in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly has dropped to its lowest level ever recorded in Gallup polling history.
Even worse for these lawbreaking mainstream media journalists whom President Trump is soon to jail, this report further warns, is that the “cries of injustice” they’ll soon spread across America in their terror and fear will fall on mostly deaf ears—and as evidenced by another stunning new poll showing that more of these people believe and trust Trump than these lying “fake news” propagandists who believe themselves to be above the laws everyone else has to obey.
And in the preparations now being done for his jailing of these journalists, this report concludes, President Trump has begun to assemble his “action team”—and that includes his former Republican Party presidential campaign foes Governor Chris Christie and Senator Marco Rubio—both of whom are the first “guests” Trump has had to a private dinner meeting at the White House since his taking power—and with Governor Christie being one of the most powerful US District Attorneys against public corruption, and Senator Rubio being a top member of the US Senate’s Select Committee on Intelligence, these CIA-led propagandists will soon realize the brutal truth of the old American maxim: “No One Is Above The Law”.
February 15, 2017 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
By Stew Webb
Someone send me a video link of Pete Brewton the author of The Mafia, CIA & George Bush.
I worked with Margie Sloan the primary researcher for Pete I contributed to the Chicago and Silverado connections as well as Iran Contra Whistleblower Al Martin also contributed to this book.
A great Read and here again Larry Mizel and Norman Brownstein the two AIPAC Directors are mentioned along with Neil Bush Silverado Savings and Loan Director.
The Mafia CIA and George Bush by Pete Brewton Video
Your kind Contributions are very much appreciated thank you. – Stew Webb
Hillary Clinton and DynCorp Pure Evil
By Stew Webb
Let us all look back at these child sex rings operating in the past and the current.
Everyone involved needs to be Jailed now.
Middle-aged men having sex with 12- to 15-year-olds was too much for Ben Johnston, a hulking 6-foot-5-inch Texan, and more than a year ago he blew the whistle on his employer, DynCorp, a U.S. contracting company doing business in Bosnia.
According to the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) lawsuit filed in Texas on behalf of the former DynCorp aircraft mechanic, “in the latter part of 1999 Johnston learned that employees and supervisors from DynCorp were engaging in perverse, illegal and inhumane behavior [and] were purchasing illegal weapons, women, forged passports and [participating in] other immoral acts. Johnston witnessed coworkers and supervisors literally buying and selling women for their own personal enjoyment, and employees would brag about the various ages and talents of the individual slaves they had purchased.”
Rather than acknowledge and reward Johnston’s effort to get this behavior stopped, DynCorp fired him, forcing him into protective custody by the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) until the investigators could get him safely out of Kosovo and returned to the United States. That departure from the war-torn country was a far cry from what Johnston imagined a year earlier when he arrived in Bosnia to begin a three-year U.S. Air Force contract with DynCorp as an aircraft-maintenance technician for Apache and Blackhawk helicopters.
For more than 50 years DynCorp, based in Reston, Va., has been a worldwide force providing maintenance support to the U.S. military through contract field teams (CFTs). As one of the federal government’s top 25 contractors, DynCorp has received nearly $1 billion since 1995 for these services and has deployed 181 personnel to Bosnia during the last six years. Although DynCorp long has been respected for such work, according to Johnston and internal DynCorp communications it appears that extracurricular sexcapades on the part of its employees were tolerated by some as part of its business in Bosnia.
But DynCorp was nervous. For instance, an internal e-mail from DynCorp employee Darrin Mills, who apparently was sent to Bosnia to look into reported problems, said, “I met with Col. Braun [a base supervisor] yesterday. He is very concerned about the CID investigation; however, he views it mostly as a DynCorp problem. What he wanted to talk about most was how I am going to fix the maintenance problems here and how the investigation is going to impact our ability to fix his airplanes.” The Mills e-mail continued: “The first thing he told me is that ‘they are tired of having smoke blown up their ass.’ They don’t want anymore empty promises.”
An e-mail from Dyncorp’s Bosnia site supervisor, John Hirtz (later fired for alleged sexual indiscretions), explains DynCorp’s position in Bosnia. “The bottom line is that DynCorp has taken what used to be a real positive program that has very high visibility with every Army unit in the world and turned it into a bag of worms. Poor quality was the major issue.”
Johnston was on the ground and saw firsthand what the military was complaining about. “My main problem,” he explains, “was [sexual misbehavior] with the kids, but I wasn’t too happy with them ripping off the government, either. DynCorp is just as immoral and elite as possible, and any rule they can break they do. There was this one guy who would hide parts so we would have to wait for parts and, when the military would question why it was taking so long, he’d pull out the part and say ‘Hey, you need to install this.’ They’d have us replace windows in helicopters that weren’t bad just to get paid. They had one kid, James Harlin, over there who was right out of high school and he didn’t even know the names and purposes of the basic tools. Soldiers that are paid $18,000 a year know more than this kid, but this is the way they [DynCorp] grease their pockets. What they say in Bosnia is that DynCorp just needs a warm body — that’s the DynCorp slogan. Even if you don’t do an eight-hour day, they’ll sign you in for it because that’s how they bill the government. It’s a total fraud.”
Remember, Johnston was fired by this company. He laughs bitterly recalling the work habits of a DynCorp employee in Bosnia who “weighed 400 pounds and would stick cheeseburgers in his pockets and eat them while he worked. The problem was he would literally fall asleep every five minutes. One time he fell asleep with a torch in his hand and burned a hole through the plastic on an aircraft.” This same man, according to Johnston, “owned a girl who couldn’t have been more than 14 years old. It’s a sick sight anyway to see any grown man [having sex] with a child, but to see some 45-year-old man who weighs 400 pounds with a little girl, it just makes you sick.” It is precisely these allegations that Johnston believes got him fired.
Johnston reports that he had been in Bosnia only a few days when he became aware of misbehavior in which many of his DynCorp colleagues were involved. He tells INSIGHT, “I noticed there were problems as soon as I got there, and I tried to be covert because I knew it was a rougher crowd than I’d ever dealt with. It’s not like I don’t drink or anything, but DynCorp employees would come to work drunk. A DynCorp van would pick us up every morning and you could smell the alcohol on them. There were big-time drinking issues. I always told these guys what I thought of what they were doing, and I guess they just thought I was a self-righteous fool or something, but I didn’t care what they thought.”
The mix of drunkenness and working on multimillion-dollar aircraft upon which the lives of U.S. military personnel depended was a serious enough issue, but Johnston drew the line when it came to buying young girls and women as sex slaves. “I heard talk about the prostitution right away, but it took some time before I understood that they were buying these girls. I’d tell them that it was wrong and that it was no different than slavery — that you can’t buy women. But they’d buy the women’s passports and they [then] owned them and would sell them to each other.”
“At first,” explains Johnston, “I just told the guys it was wrong. Then I went to my supervisors, including John Hirtz, although at the time I didn’t realize how deep into it he was. Later I learned that he had videotaped himself having sex with two girls and CID has that video as evidence. Hirtz is the guy who would take new employees to the brothels and set them up so he got his women free. The Serbian mafia would give Hirtz the women free and, when one of the guys was leaving the country, Hirtz would go to the mafia and make sure that the guys didn’t owe them any money.”
“None of the girls,” continues Johnston, “were from Bosnia. They were from Russia, Romania and other places, and they were imported in by DynCorp and the Serbian mafia. These guys would say ‘I gotta go to Serbia this weekend to pick up three girls.’ They talk about it and brag about how much they pay for them — usually between $600 and $800. In fact, there was this one guy who had to be 60 years old who had a girl who couldn’t have been 14. DynCorp leadership was 100 percent in bed with the mafia over there. I didn’t get any results from talking to DynCorp officials, so I went to Army CID and I drove around with them, pointing out everyone’s houses who owned women and weapons.”
That’s when Johnston’s life took a dramatic turn.
On June 2, 2000, members of the 48th Military Police Detachment conducted a sting on the DynCorp hangar at Comanche Base Camp, one of two U.S. bases in Bosnia, and all DynCorp personnel were detained for questioning. CID spent several weeks working the investigation and the results appear to support Johnston’s allegations. For example, according to DynCorp employee Kevin Werner’s sworn statement to CID, “during my last six months I have come to know a man we call ‘Debeli,’ which is Bosnian for fat boy. He is the operator of a nightclub by the name of Harley’s that offers prostitution. Women are sold hourly, nightly or permanently.”
Werner admitted to having purchased a woman to get her out of prostitution and named other DynCorp employees who also had paid to own women. He further admitted to having purchased weapons (against the law in Bosnia) and it was Werner who turned over to CID the videotape made by Hirtz. Werner apparently intended to use the video as leverage in the event that Hirtz decided to fire him. Werner tells CID, “I told him [Hirtz] I had a copy and that all I wanted was to be treated fairly. If I was going to be fired or laid off, I wanted it to be because of my work performance and not because he was not happy with me.”
According to Hirtz’s own sworn statement to CID, there appears to be little doubt that he did indeed rape one of the girls with whom he is shown having sexual intercourse in his homemade video.
CID: Did you have sexual intercourse with the second woman on the tape?
CID: Did you have intercourse with the second woman after she said “no” to you?
Hirtz: I don’t recall her saying that. I don’t think it was her saying “no.”
CID: Who do you think said “no”?
Hirtz: I don’t know.
CID: According to what you witnessed on the videotape played for you in which you were having sexual intercourse with the second woman, did you have sexual intercourse with the second woman after she said “no” to you?
CID: Did you know you were being videotaped?
Hirtz: Yes. I set it up.
CID: Did you know it is wrong to force yourself upon someone without their consent?
The CID agents did not ask any of the men involved what the ages of the “women” were who had been purchased or used for prostitution. According to CID, which sought guidance from the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate in Bosnia, “under the Dayton Peace Accord, the contractors were protected from Bosnian law which did not apply to them. They knew of no [U.S.] federal laws that would apply to these individuals at this time.”
However, CID took another look and, according to the investigation report, under Paragraph 5 of the NATO Agreement Between the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia regarding the status of NATO and its personnel, contractors “were not immune from local prosecution if the acts were committed outside the scope of their official duties.”
Incredibly, the CID case was closed in June 2000 and turned over to the Bosnian authorities. DynCorp says it conducted its own investigation, and Hirtz and Werner were fired by DynCorp and returned to the United States but were not prosecuted. Experts in slave trafficking aren’t buying the CID’s interpretation of the law.
Widney Brown, an advocate for Human Rights Watch, tells INSIGHT “our government has an obligation to tell these companies that this behavior is wrong and they will be held accountable. They should be sending a clear message that it won’t be tolerated. One would hope that these people wouldn’t need to be told that they can’t buy women, but you have to start off by laying the ground rules. Rape is a crime in any jurisdiction and there should not be impunity for anyone. Firing someone is not sufficient punishment. This is a very distressing story — especially when you think that these people and organizations are going into these countries to try and make it better, to restore a rule of law and some civility.”
Christine Dolan, founder of the International Humanitarian Campaign Against the Exploitation of Children, a Washington-based nonprofit organization, tells Insight: “What is surprising to me is that Dyncorp has kept this contract. The U.S. says it wants to eradicate trafficking of people, has established an office in the State Department for this purpose, and yet neither State nor the government-contracting authorities have stepped in and done an investigation of this matter.”
Dolan says, “It’s not just Americans who are participating in these illegal acts. But what makes this more egregious for the U.S. is that our purpose in those regions is to restore some sense of civility. Now you’ve got employees of U.S. contractors in bed with the local mafia and buying kids for sex! That these guys have some kind of immunity from prosecution is morally outrageous. How can men be allowed to get away with rape simply because of location? Rape is a crime no matter where it occurs and it’s important to remember that even prostitution is against the law in Bosnia. The message we’re sending to kids is that it’s okay for America’s representatives to rape children. We talk about the future of the children, helping to build economies, democracy, the rule of law, and at the same time we fail to prosecute cases like this. That is immoral and hypocritical, and if DynCorp is involved in this in any way it should forfeit its contract and pay restitution in the form of training about trafficking.”
Charlene Wheeless, a spokeswoman for DynCorp, vehemently denies any culpability on the part of the company, According to Wheeless, “The notion that a company such as DynCorp would turn a blind eye to illegal behavior by our employees is incomprehensible. DynCorp adheres to a core set of values that has served as the backbone of our corporation for the last 55 years, helping us become one of the largest and most respected professional-services and outsourcing companies in the world. We can’t stress strongly enough that, as an employee-owned corporation, we take ethics very seriously. DynCorp stands by its decision to terminate [whistle-blower] Ben Johnston, who was terminated for cause.”
What was the “cause” for which Johnston was fired? He received his only reprimand from DynCorp one day prior to the sting on the DynCorp hangar when Johnston was working with CID. A week later he received a letter of discharge for bringing “discredit to the company and the U.S. Army while working in Tuzla, Bosnia-Herzegovina.” The discharge notice did not say how Johnston “brought discredit to the company.”
It soon developed conveniently, according to Johnston’s attorneys, that he was implicated by a DynCorp employee for illegal activity in Bosnia. Harlin, the young high-school graduate Johnston complained had no experience in aircraft maintenance and didn’t even know the purposes of the basic tools, provided a sworn statement to CID about Johnston. Asked if anyone ever had offered to sell him a weapon, Harlin fingered Johnston and DynCorp employee Tom Oliver, who also had disapproved of the behavior of DynCorp employees.
Harlin even alleged that Johnston was “hanging out with Kevin Werner.” Although Werner had no problem revealing the names and illegal activities of other DynCorp employees, Werner did not mention Johnston’s name in his sworn statement.
Kevin Glasheen, Johnston’s attorney, says flatly of this: “It’s DynCorp’s effort to undermine Ben’s credibility. But I think once the jury hears this case, that accusation is only going to make them more angry at DynCorp. In order to make our claim, we have to show that DynCorp was retaliating against Ben, and that fits under racketeering. There is a lot of evidence that shows this was what they were doing and that it went all the way up the management chain.”
According to Glasheen, “DynCorp says that whatever these guys were doing isn’t corporate activity and they’re not responsible for it. But this problem permeated their business and management and they made business decisions to further the scheme and to cover it up. We have to show that there was a causal connection between Ben’s whistle-blowing about the sex trade and his being fired. We can do that. We’re here to prove a retaliation case, not convict DynCorp of participating in the sex-slave trade.
“What you have here is a Lord of the Flies mentality. Basically you’ve got a bunch of strong men who are raping and manipulating young girls who have been kidnapped from their homes. Who’s the bad guy? Is it the guy who buys the girl to give her freedom, the one who kidnaps her and sells her or the one who liberates her and ends up having sex with her? And what does it mean when the U.S. steps up and says, ‘We don’t have any jurisdiction’? That’s absurd.”
The outraged attorney pauses for breath. “This is more than one twisted mind. There was a real corporate culture with a deep commitment to a cover-up. And it’s outrageous that DynCorp still is being paid by the government on this contract. The worst thing I’ve seen is a DynCorp e-mail after this first came up where they’re saying how they have turned this thing into a marketing success, that they have convinced the government that they could handle something like this.”
Johnston is not the only DynCorp employee to blow the whistle and sue the billion-dollar government contractor. Kathryn Bolkovac, a U.N. International Police Force monitor hired by the U.S. company on another U.N.-related contract, has filed a lawsuit in Great Britain against DynCorp for wrongful termination. DynCorp had a $15 million contract to hire and train police officers for duty in Bosnia at the time she reported such officers were paying for prostitutes and participating in sex-trafficking. Many of these were forced to resign under suspicion of illegal activity, but none have been prosecuted, as they also enjoy immunity from prosecution in Bosnia.
DynCorp has admitted it fired five employees for similar illegal activities prior to Johnston’s charges.
But Johnston worries about what this company’s culture does to the reputation of the United States. “The Bosnians think we’re all trash. It’s a shame. When I was there as a soldier they loved us, but DynCorp employees have changed how they think about us. I tried to tell them that this is not how all Americans act, but it’s hard to convince them when you see what they’re seeing. The fact is, DynCorp is the worst diplomat you could possibly have over there.”
Johnston’s attorney looks to the outcome. “How this all ends,” says Glasheen, “will say a lot about what we stand for and what we won’t stand for.”
Kelly Patricia O’Meara is an investigative reporter for Insight.
President Trump Fox Interview Super Bowl 2017
Stew Webb Radio
Spot Dog Spot Dog is Rabbit and Enraged, Drain the Swamp and Lock them Up.
President Donald Trump American Revolution Continues
Billy Joel’s official YouTube channel features music videos,
live performances, interviews, TV appearances and more.
Best known for his first hit song, ‘Piano Man’, in 1973,
Billy has written and recorded thirty-three Top 40 hits in the
United States. He is a six-time Grammy Award winner, a 23-time Grammy nominee and one of the world’s best-selling artists of all time, having sold over 150 million records worldwide. Billy Joel is the sixth-best-selling recording artist and the third-best-selling solo artist in the United States.
You have to learn to pace yourself
You’re just like everybody else
You’ve only had to run so far
But you will come to a place
Where the only thing you feel
Are loaded guns in your face
And you’ll have to deal with
You used to call me paranoid
But even you cannot avoid
You turned the tap dance into your crusade
Now here you are with your faith
And your Peter Pan advice
You have no scars on your face
And you cannot handle