Whistleblower launches legal fund
for imminent suit against Bush-Clinton officials
by Tom Flocco
www.tomflocco.com 
www.stewwebb.com
Kansas City, MO—October 22, 2008—Long-time federal whistleblower
Stewart Webb sounded like his time had finally arrived now that he is surrounded
by a coterie of seasoned attorneys, active and retired federal agency witnesses
and others unnamed to protect their safety who will help him take on what he
called a corrupt and criminal administration whose key players were recruited
from the Reagan-Bush 41 administrations.
The former home builder and realtor told TomFlocco.com that he will soon
file suit in U.S. District Court against top-level Bush-Clinton shadow
government partner Leonard Millman and several Justice Department officials
linked to others more senior in government under the Racketeering Influenced
Corrupt Organization (RICO) and False Claims Act, Frauds upon the Courts, obstruction of justice,
violations of parental rights, kidnapping, forgery, perjury and slander, among other
criminal acts.
Just before the 1992 election Webb’s elderly parents suffered through his
illegal imprisonment for ten months by Bush 41 and Clinton administration
officials seeking to insure that the whistleblower would be unable to expose
what he knew and what other illegally incarcerated agents told him regarding a
shadow government operation referred to collectively by political prisoners as
“the Bush-Clinton crime family.”
With the help of agency witnesses and his legal team, Webb will also attempt to
be reunited with his daughter who he has not seen in 24 years after she was
taken from him by a corrupt judicial system—but not before he introduces proof
and evidence into federal court via a legal complaint encompassing the
fraudulent theft of trillions from the United States Treasury, blackmail of
House and Senate members, murders, narcotics trafficking, a variety of financial
frauds and obstruction of justice related to all of the foregoing.
JOHN_MCCAINS_WIFE_HIDING_WAR_PROFITS_UNTAXED_OFF_SHORE_ACCOUNTS.htm
Some of the above has been previously detailed on TomFlocco.com; however,
we were particularly affected by two published radio interviews involving a
young man castrated in the presence of well-known officials at the highest
levels of government and Darlene Novinger an FBI agent and her family who were attacked with
biological agents in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania in 1994 by rogue U.S. agency
officials which resulted in their deaths—such is the gravity of the charges to
be promulgated by Webb.
Patriotic Americans desiring to see the current administration held accountable
for impeachable, corrupt and criminal actions will soon be able to monitor a new
court action buttressed by Kansas City attorneys from two firms who firmly
believe that Webb's charges against top Bush-Clinton officials will stand the
test of judicial procedure when introduced into the federal court system.
Because there is a significant expense involved, Webb is asking concerned
citizens to help support his lawsuit financially (address—Stewart Webb, P.O.
Box 3061, Independence, MO. 64055 / phone—(913) 952-0846 / email—StewWebb@StewWebb.com
/ website—www.StewWebb.com)
as he launches a legal fund to help defray filing fees and legal work: “Any
contribution would be greatly appreciated as I seek to hold these government
officials accountable for their criminal acts.”
Since 1989 Webb has provided evidence with other whistleblowers to federal
officials regarding the Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Savings and Loan
and Denver Airport scandals involving illegal campaign money laundering by Larry
Mizel, Leonard and Elaine Millman, Charles Keating, Maurice Hank Greenberg,
Jack Abramoff and others who he alleges were bribing, influencing and
blackmailing members of the House and Senate.
Stew Webb Savings & Loan Whistleblower faces federal charges.jpg
House of Rep HUD Stew Webb.jpg
“I have appeared on 2500 radio programs exposing the crimes of the Bush
41/43-Leonard Millman-Carl Lindner-Clinton crime families and their shadow
government,” said the federal whistleblower, adding “investigations of my
father-in-law Leonard Millman and his wife Elaine are linked to other scandals
such as the Oklahoma City bombing, the 9/11 terrorist attack on America and the
Enron pension fraud connected to $195 billion in missing funds now held in
secret Bush bank accounts.”
T-Bush Bank Accounts Narco Frauds 911.htm
Webb's suit accuses the defendants of violating his constitutional and legal
rights related to attempts by “current and former government officials to
discredit, punish and seek revenge against” him for publicly exposing $6
trillion stolen from the U.S. Treasury, HUD and American investors, but also for
narcotics trafficking and money laundering.
Grand Jury 95 Y 107 Page 1.jpg
Grand Jury Demand July 1 2003 .html
Grand Jury Demand Aug 4 2004.html
The suit will be filed nearly twenty-four years after Webb's parental rights were illegally terminated regarding his only daughter Amanda Webb, aka Amanda Millman, with lifetime illegal restraining orders to keep them apart.
Amanda Webb aka Amanda Millman
AmandaMillman.html
The complaint seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and
costs which will hopefully be partially defrayed by the launching of his legal
fund to receive contributions from citizens who agree that Bush and Clinton
administration officials should be held accountable for their crimes.
The legal fund will also be used for counseling witnesses by Webb's legal team
prior to cross-examination in the up-coming trial by attorneys representing
government officials while also assisting Webb with costs associated with
racketeering by Denver FBI Division 5 and the Denver U.S. attorney's
office.
“My chief concern will be to repatriate to the U.S. Treasury $6 trillion
stolen by Mr. Millman and his organized crime family linked to members of the
Bush and Clinton administrations. My time will be dedicated to insuring damages
are collected and that illegally gained Millman assets are confiscated on behalf
of the United States of America,” said Webb.
Webb's suit also has personal implications as it further alleges obstruction of
justice, kidnapping, Frauds upon the Court, perjury and forgery by the Millmans, who Webb charges used
government connections to the court system to keep him apart from his daughter
for her whole life thus far, denying them both of their rights to have a
father-daughter relationship because his in-laws were in partnership with high
government officials and that these illegal acts violated both United States
laws and those in other states where Millman allegedly operated.
The imminent filing of Webb's complaint specifies that Amanda Webb and her
father have been deprived of First and Fifth Amendment rights and that Stewart
Webb has suffered a gross invasion of his privacy and has been impaired in
pursuing professional opportunities while he fears for his daughter's safety
resulting from the necessity to file his case in Kansas City District Court.
“My father-in-law Leonard Millman was a partner with Bill and Hillary Clinton,
George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, Neil Bush, Jeb Bush and others allegedly
committing criminal acts involving various scandals related to narcotics
importation, Iran-contra, oil and gas frauds, junk bond daisy chain frauds, HUD
frauds, savings & loan and bank frauds, real estate loan frauds, securities
frauds, stock frauds, government contract frauds, pension fund frauds,
obstruction of justice, bribing and blackmailing government officials and
murders,” said Webb.
Webb said his parental rights were terminated when perjury and the forgery of
his signature were employed to falsely state that he gave up his daughter Amanda
Webb for life accompanied by a court-ordered lifetime restraining order and the
illegal changing of his daughter's name in Denver, Colorado.
The complaint will allege additional forgery, perjury, frauds upon the court and obstruction of justice
by the court which ruled Webb accepted $1.5 million after agreeing to give up
his daughter—all of which was illegal and never occurred, save for the
falsified documents claiming the contrary.
Should the civil action result in a payment to Stewart Webb that is in excess of
costs associated with his legal activities, the equivalent of all monies
contributed to his legal fund will be returned to contributors ten-fold, he
told TomFlocco.com. (For example, $100 contributed will pay back $1,000 to
the contributor.)
Webb also told us he will “contribute part of his civil award estimated by his
attorneys at $3-5 billion and false claim awards of 15-30% of an estimated $6
trillion to a trust for his daughter Amanda Webb, which will also be used to
assist other federal whistleblowers whose rights have been violated from
retaliatory actions by the United States government, specifically including
whistleblowers currently seeking claims for damages resulting from Bush Millman-Lindner-Clinton
crime syndicate actions.”
Whistleblowers
Those wishing to contribute to Webb's legal fund may contact him at (913)
999-1058 or use other contact points listed above.
whistleblower_launches_legal_fund.
prosecute_bush_millman_lindner_clinton_crime_syndicate.
sub_prime_bailout_us_treasury_theft.
stew_webb_federal_whistleblower.
Grand Jury 95 Y 107 Page 1.jpg
Grand Jury Demand July 1 2003 .
Inside The Bush Crime Family Part1.
Inside The Bush Crime Family Part2.
Webb stated he will close the fund contributions
upon filing.
A copy of the complaint will be posted at TomFlocco.com and StewWebb.com
immediately after it is filed in U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Missouri.
Two example pages of suit below
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Stewart A Webb, CASE NUMBER
and
The United States Of America
Plaintiffs, JURY TRIAL DEMAND
CIVIL RICO
vs. QUE TAM
FALSE CLAIMS ACT
Kerre Sue Millman KIDNAPPING
"Flight Risk" UNIFORM CHILD
"Fugitive from Justice" CUSTODY ACT
Texas Case Number 84-2107-MI FRAUDS UPON THE
COURT
Leonard Yale Millman OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
"Organized Crime Figure" ATTEMPTED MURDER
Reported Deceased Feb 2004 TREASON AND SEDITION
Leonard Millman's Trusts and Estate 9-11 MASS MURDERS
9-11-2001 TERRORIST FINANCING
Elaine Ruth Millman BARKLEY-COLE-
"Organized Crime Figure" INDENTURE ACT
Terrorist ISRAEL ESPIONAGE
Sub Prime Queen RE-INSURANCE FRAUDS
"Flight Risk" SECURITY FRAUDS
SAVINGS & LOAN FRAUDSBLACKMAIL OF U.S.
Mark Hostlaw CONGRESS
Denver FBI #5 ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN
Acting Under Color of Law MONEY LAUNDERING
Mark Hostlaw BRIBERY OF PUBLIC
Acting in individually and in OFFICIALS
personal capacity BRIBERY OF U.S.
Linda Thomas ATTORNEYS
Judge Dallas Texas BRIBERY OF U.S.
Acting Under Color of Law CONGRESSMAN
Linda Thomas BRIBERY OF U.S.
Acting in individually and in SENATORS
personal capacity BRIBERY OF JUDGES
Brian Campbell NARCOTICS MONEY
Denver City and County Court LAUNDERING
Acting Under Color of Law
NARCOTICS IMPORTATIONINTO USA
ECONOMIC PLUNDER
SUB PRIME LOAN FRAUDS
HUD FRAUDS & THEFT
GOVERNMENT CONTRACT
FRAUDS
RETALIATION AGAINST
WITNESS AND
INFORMANTS
FEDERAL
WHISTLEBLOWER ACT
BIVENS
42 U.S.C. 1983- VIOLATIONS
"CCE" Ongoing Continuous
Enterprise
TREASON & SEDITION
ESTIMATED TOTAL RECOVERY $6 TRILLION UNDER QUE TAM-FALSE CLAIMS ACT TO FEDERAL TREASURY
NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Stewart A. Webb, (Stew Webb herein) and herein, upon information and belief and established facts, and for his causes of action against all named and unnamed Defendants alleges and states the following:
I
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Plaintiff’s federal claim arises pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983; jurisdiction properly lies in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 (Federal question), and Plaintiff invokes this Court’s supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367 to hear Plaintiff’s pendent state tort claims; venue properly lies in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
Further, in violations of
QUE TAM
FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT
31 USC 3729-3733
§ 3729. False claims
(a) Liability for Certain Acts. - Any person who -
(1) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the United States Government or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;
(2) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the Government;
(3) conspires to defraud the Government by getting a false or fraudulent claim allowed or paid;
(4) has possession, custody, or control of property or money used, or to be used, by the Government and, intending to defraud the Government or willfully to conceal the property, delivers, or causes to be delivered, less property than the amount for which the person receives a certificate or receipt;
(5) authorized to make or deliver a document certifying receipt of property used, or to be used, by the Government and, intending to defraud the Government, makes or delivers the receipt without completely knowing that the information on the receipt is true;
(6) knowingly buys, or receives as a pledge of an obligation or debt, public property from an officer or employee of the Government, or a member of the Armed Forces, who lawfully may not sell or pledge the property; or
(7) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government, is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000, plus 3 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act of that person, except that if the court finds that -
(A) the person committing the violation of this subsection furnished officials of the United States responsible for investigating false claims violations with all information known to such person about the violation within 30 days after the date on which the defendant first obtained the information;
(B) such person fully cooperated with any Government investigation of such violation; and
(C) at the time such person furnished the United States with the information about the violation, no criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative action had commenced under this title with respect to such violation, and the person did not have actual knowledge of the existence of an investigation into such violation; the court may assess not less than 2 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act of the person. A person violating this subsection shall also be liable to the United States Government for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any such penalty or damages.
(b) Knowing and Knowingly Defined. - For purposes of this section, the terms "knowing" and "knowingly" mean that a person, with respect to information -
(1) has actual knowledge of the information;
(2) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or
(3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information, and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required.
(c) Claim Defined. - For purposes of this section, "claim" includes any request or demand, whether under a contract or otherwise, for money or property which is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the United States Government provides any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded, or if the Government will reimburse such contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded.
(d) Exemption From Disclosure. - Any information furnished pursuant to subparagraphs (A) through (C) of subsection (a) shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5.
(e) Exclusion. - This section does not apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
§ 3730. Civil actions for false claims
(a) Responsibilities of the Attorney General. - The Attorney General diligently shall investigate a violation under section 3729. If the Attorney General finds that a person has violated or is violating section 3729, the Attorney General may bring a civil action under this section against the person.
(b) Actions by Private Persons. - (1) A person may bring a civil action for a violation of section 3729 for the person and for the United States Government. The action shall be brought in the name of the Government. The action may be dismissed only if the court and the Attorney General give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting. (2) A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the Government pursuant to Rule 4(d)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The Government may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after it receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information. (3) The Government may, for good cause shown, move the court for extensions of the time during which the complaint remains under seal under paragraph (2). Any such motions may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera. The defendant shall not be required to respond to any complaint filed under this section until 20 days after the complaint is unsealed and served upon the defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (4) Before the expiration of the 60-day period or any extensions obtained under paragraph (3), the Government shall -
(A) proceed with the action, in which case the action shall be conducted by the Government; or
(B) notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action shall have the right to conduct the action. (5) When a person brings an action under this subsection, no person other than the Government may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action.
(c) Rights of the Parties to Qui Tam Actions. - (1) If the Government proceeds with the action, it shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and shall not be bound by an act of the person bringing the action. Such person shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2). (2)(A) The Government may dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the person has been notified by the Government of the filing of the motion and the court has provided the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion. (B) The Government may settle the action with the defendant notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances. Upon a showing of good cause, such hearing may be held in camera. (C) Upon a showing by the Government that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the Government's prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the person's participation, such as -
(i) limiting the number of witnesses the person may call;
(ii) limiting the length of the testimony of such witnesses;
(iii) limiting the person's cross-examination of witnesses; or
(iv) otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation. (D) Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation. (3) If the Government elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action shall have the right to conduct the action. If the Government so requests, it shall be served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action and shall be supplied with copies of all deposition transcripts (at the Government's expense). When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the status and rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the Government to intervene at a later date upon a showing of good cause. (4) Whether or not the Government proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the Government that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with the Government's investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay such discovery for a period of not more than 60 days. Such a showing shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 60-day period upon a further showing in camera that the Government has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceedings.
(5) Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Government may elect to pursue its claim through any alternate remedy available to the Government, including any administrative proceeding to determine a civil money penalty. If any such alternate remedy is pursued in another proceeding, the person initiating the action shall have the same rights in such proceeding as such person would have had if the action had continued under this section. Any finding of fact or conclusion of law made in such other proceeding that has become final shall be conclusive on all parties to an action under this section. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a finding or conclusion is final if it has been finally determined on appeal to the appropriate court of the United States, if all time for filing such an appeal with respect to the finding or conclusion has expired, or if the finding or conclusion is not subject to judicial review.
(d) Award to Qui Tam Plaintiff. - (1) If the Government proceeds with an action brought by a person under subsection (b), such person shall, subject to the second sentence of this paragraph, receive at least 15 percent but not more than 25 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action. Where the action is one which the court finds to be based primarily on disclosures of specific information (other than information provided by the person bringing the action) relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a congressional, administrative, or Government (FOOTNOTE 1) Accounting Office report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the court may award such sums as it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the proceeds, taking into account the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation. Any payment to a person under the first or second sentence of this paragraph shall be made from the proceeds. Any such person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses which the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. All such expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant. (FOOTNOTE 1) So in original. Probably should be "General". (2) If the Government does not proceed with an action under this section, the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive an amount which the court decides is reasonable for collecting the civil penalty and damages. The amount shall be not less than 25 percent and not more than 30 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement and shall be paid out of such proceeds. Such person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses which the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. All such expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant. (3) Whether or not the Government proceeds with the action, if the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of section 3729 upon which the action was brought, then the court may, to the extent the court considers appropriate, reduce the share of the proceeds of the action which the person would otherwise receive under paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection, taking into account the role of that person in advancing the case to litigation and any relevant circumstances pertaining to the violation. If the person bringing the action is convicted of criminal conduct arising from his or her role in the violation of section 3729, that person shall be dismissed from the civil action and shall not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. Such dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the United States to continue the action, represented by the Department of Justice. (4) If the Government does not proceed with the action and the person bringing the action conducts the action, the court may award to the defendant its reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim of the person bringing the action was clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious, or brought primarily for purposes of harassment.
QUE TAM
FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT
31 USC 3729-3733
§ 3729. False claims Act
Federal Whistleblower Act of 1986
Plaintiff s Federal claim arises pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3729-32
The Federal Whistleblower Act of 1986, a judicial act.
Retaliation against a Federal Whistleblower-Informant Stewart A. Webb Plaintiff.
Co conspirators Not Named As Defendants In This Action
Those who have intentionally willingly and wantonly engaged in RICO against Stewart A. Webb Plaintiff.
This is a Complex Litigated Case and Multiply Jury Trials will be necessary.
Note: Some of the known Business Partners of Leonard and Elaine Millman who also have violated numerous US Laws with Leonard and Elaine Millman who are not being named as Co-Conspirators at this time:
George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, Jeb Bush, Neil Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Charles Keating, Michael Miliken, Phillip Winn, Larry Mizel, Norman Brownstein, Allen Karsh, Maurice Hank Greenberg, Jack Abramoff, Gwendolyn Waymark, Gale Norton, James M. Lyons, Jackson Stephens, Oliver North, General Richard Secord and elements of the Israeli Mossad among many others.
Currently the George W. Bush Administration is proposing a huge Sub-Prime US Taxpayer Financed Bailout for Elaine Ruth Millman and her artificially created Mortgages on house that were never build.
These illegal financial instruments of approximately 200,000 plus mortgages with Frauds tied to Richmond American Homes of Denver and KB Homes of Denver owned and controlled by Leonard and Elaine Millman.
Note Previously ignored Federal Grand Jury Demands by Plaintiff since 1992:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=1710904